Category Archives: Elections

Tucker Carlson on 2024

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

This is excellent. And could be considered a master’s class in reading between the lines.

The whole speech:

 

DEMOCRATS call out the obvious fraud in the Mississippi election

Posted on by — Leave a reply

Now this is interesting.

Tucker Carlson interviewing Presidential candidates: 8:34:44

Posted on by — 2 Comments ↓

Not having watched this at all yet, save a few Tweets with Tucker and Mike Pence, we post this as a PSA. Oz-Rita has watched a chunk and says Carlson is Brilliant in this. I have no doubt this is the case. Carson, while perhaps not always right in our opinion, has a solid grip on reality. Content starts at around 17 minutes in.

On the US based Muslim City Council banning transflags and serious CyberSec analysts look at the Dominion machines and their vulnerabilities

Posted on by — 6 Comments ↓

1. City council which is Democrat, and 100% islamic, bans pride flags on city property. This is as interesting challenge to leftist narrative attacks. But the media manages to maintain its usual dialectic by avoiding the Islamic fact of the city council, by claiming that not flying the Trans-gay flags along side the American flag on government property is not neutral, but an attack on these groups. The lie behind this is too obvious of course. If there was any truth in this, they would have to fly every flag of every group that claims it is a vulnerable or oppressed minority. You would need a flag pole 400 feet high. But, like the growing and impossible list of compulsory pronouns, intended to make aspects of communication difficult to illegal, the minority flags will probably all be replaced with this one soon, just as pronouns will likely all be replaced with “Comrade”.

Dr. Turley explains the Marxist cause behind all this in the video but let us offer our own addendum to it, as I don’t think these groups ever see themselves as oppressed as he explains. These groups are often fictions altogether. They create the belief that they are oppressed in order to use “Liberating Tolerance” in order to destroy us, and our systems of everything. Muslims have been using the left to achieve Global Islamic Manifest destiny since the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1920s. The reverse is also true. The left has used the muslims for the same purpose. We have written about this before as concerns the Ottawa Islamic protest against the school board on Monday. As an aside, there is another one planned for this coming Monday with both Christians and Muslims. It will be interesting to see if the Jacobin-Media complex have a strategy for this one that will allow them to make it public after the fact such that they can maintain their narrative positions that this is not an Islamic point of view, and that all who do not want their children sexualized or made into Eunuchs are somehow hate filled White Supremacists. These Muslims voted Democrat because it was what they needed to do for power in this area and others. Now that they have it, this will be used for Islamic norms. Having said that, thei Council’s argument, that the only pride flag they need is Red White and Blue, is an excellent one. Essentially libertarian. And we can all agree that representing everyone in the context of the organization is the only correct way to do things. This is worth keeping an eye on.

 

2. This site has of course maintained that the 2020 US presidential election was a fraud. The only issue is how was it cheated to get Joe Biden in as president. The disinformation campaigns at the start were genius. To blame the voting machines in a particular way that is not how it was done. took all the effort, money and attention from how it was. Going to first principles, Hiding the Hunter Biden laptop and claiming it was Russian disinformation would be enough for any Democrat to claim the election was a fraud, had it been done to them. If it was Trump’s son, and showed that kind of corruption and influence peddling. So its a fraud out of the gate with just that. Add Trump being banned from Twitter and Facebook disallowing the GOP to raise funds and its a fix in enough ways to qualify it as a third world election. Add to that, the movie 2000 Muslim by Dinesh D’Souza, a movie which a very reliable Cyber-Security observer we know said that this was the case, this is how it was done, and yes the election was stolen. From our perspective this was a third vector of theft. But now something interesting has happened. Some of the top Cyber Security [CYBERSEC] people in the world are reexamining the Dominion machines. It is possible that the machines did have an exploit which could change the outcome of an election to be other than just counting the number of votes case. Well waddaya know about that.

EXPLOSIVE: Halderman Report Released in Georgia – Confirms VOTES CAN BE ALTERED Through Defective Dominion Voting Machines – Raffensperger Hid This From Public – Garland Favorito Weighs In

Please read this whole thread

Also read this thread. This person has a sterling reputation amongst CYBERSEC analysts. Both these people are worth a follow if this is in your field of interest.

Classic Discourse Theory or dialectic attacks are already taking place against this CYBERSEC analyst. Which means he is most likely on to something. “Election Denier” is the perfect replacement term on the Discourse Theory form for, “Climate Denier”, “White Supremacist” and all the other terms applied generally speaking for anyone who may be making a move that the left would see as counter-revolutionary.

On the Alberta Leadership debate

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

The following post was written by an Alberta resident and political pundit, familiar with the candidates and issues of that province and this race. Thank you sir for sending this in!

On May 18, 2023, the Alberta debate between Premier Danielle Smith and Opposition Leader Rachel Notley took place.

The debate was moderated by CTV News and Global News. The moderation was done reasonably fairly, and even the panel that had been assembled to pose the questions was presented quite well as attended by Post Media, City News and CBC Alberta.

The participant’s apparel was interesting in that Premier Smith wore her party’s colours – blue, while Leader Notley wore Smith’s colours … blue! Hmmm! During the debate, Notley addressed her remarks directly at Smith, seemingly scolding Smith, all the while Smith directly connected to her audience through the cameral lens, presenting genuine smiles as she talked about Alberta and the prospects for a bright future.

It was clear from the outset that Rachel Notley was on the defence. On several occasions, questions were asking for specific answers. Smith gave those, while Notley stumbled around saying, “That was a good question” and paraphrased, “We need to look at ways to improve on the problem posed.” In other words, no real answer.

At times, the exchange got into mudslinging, with accusations of law breaking coming from Notley, and levelled at Smith. It should be noted that there is no evidence of breaking the law, or any charges even being contemplated. What is clear is that CBC and others propagated misleading information, something they seem to have a penchant for doing.

There was the normal promulgation and denial of numbers, as comparisons were made regarding job losses and revenue losses during Notley’s reign, and the job returns upon the UCP regaining leadership. What is clear, is that financial conditions deteriorated considerably across many industries including the oil and gas industry as well as support sectors while Notley was in power.

Both candidates made their fair share of projections into the future including both individuals making strong statements about NOT having medical patients being charged for doctor’s visits. This has been a major campaign issue to-date. Varied methods of revenue allocation have been discussion topics, and speculative thoughts have somehow been converted into promises going forward. Reality seems to be on another planet, especially whenever Notley presents her personal and party views.

But Smith, perhaps came up with the best line of the night when she said about Notley, “She doesn’t want to run on her record. And the reason she doesn’t want to run on her record is, it was an absolute disaster!” Record debts had been realized, and the major downturn in economy ultimately cost Notley her position as Premier.

It is questionable whether the hardliners on either side might be convinced otherwise, but a significant part of the fence-sitters might be swayed one way or another.

In the end, it will be a debate worth the record, to evaluate whether promises come true.

 

Some items on Brazil from yesterday and today (December 11 & 12)

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

December 11th:

These three links are from December 11th and deal with the election fraud. They may or may not have English translation available yet.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGWS0kuDFkOmH-I4JstmRrA

https://www.twitch.tv/worldlivebrazilen

https://www.facebook.com/News-BR-102899662651371/videos/?ref=page_internal

December 12: Police Violently Assault and Arrest Indigenous Protest Leader Sererê in Brazil – His Wife Begs Authorities for Assistance! Protesters Surround Police Station! – VIDEO

To our readers: The international corporate media refuses to report on the massive uprising of millions in Brazil against the fraudulent presidential elections held at the end of October. The globalist press has decided that Bolsonaro must go, just like they decided that President Donald Trump must go.

The people of Brazil disagree. MILLIONS of protesters have taken to the streets of every major city for over 40 straight days.

On Monday night Indigenous Brazilian protest leader Cacique Sererê was violently assaulted and then taken away by police. Sererê has been leading protests against the communist takeover of the country.

December 12: “Justice is Rigged” – Brazil Election Breakdown: Officials Shut Down Website and Remove Evidence After It Was Exposed

Argentine data expert Fernando Cerimedo gave a worldwide presentation on the anomalies in the Brazilian presidential election. While there is no direct proof of fraud, the statistical anomalies are so egregious to demand a thorough investigation.

In his original report on Nov. 4. Cerimedo pointed out the discrepancies between pre-2020 voting machines and 2020 voting machines, which have internal memory and are auditable.

This video is from on or before November 27, 2022:

As the situation in Brazil becomes more and more serious, the media becomes more and more censorious. Fascinating that.

Please add any news items, videos or information on Brazil’s state of being today to the comments under this post.

 

Taking the country back: A new holiday for Canada and maybe after, the World

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

Clearly we cannot expect the elites to act in the interests of the public. The Catholic Church under Francis appears to be undermining all the precepts of that institution. They are doing so with a similar kind of humiliating set of deceptions and controls as are the political leaders. Both the Church and the State appear to be forcing a kind of Biblical apocalypse to take place. Note the order of the Four Horsemen from Revelations 6:7 which describes in this order, Plague, War, Famine and Death. This would appear to be a cycle one could cause. After a plague, one could start a war if one doesn’t naturally start as it would after a plague, which would likely cause a famine, or one could be engineered and then of course, a lot of death.

It occurs that perhaps, we need to retake the intellectual commons back as ours, which they were always meant to be.

Christmas is pretty much removed from Christianity, and often negated using the now all too familiar of the dialectic, ‘offensiveness to non-Christians’. Easter is more intact but mocked like it was in the Soviet Union. We can see what is happening with national holiday celebrations. Especially during the “2 weeks to flatten the curve”.

Why not start an annual Holiday on January 29th, the day the Freedom Convoy officially started.

The orthodox, or really dedicated, could celebrate Freedom day eve on the 28th by gathering at the local legislature and reminding the elite where the real power lies. All that takes is a lot of people who will not accept lies or obey unlawful orders and restrictions on their basic liberties. The video below is from Ottawa on the night before the Freedom Convoy was to begin. Actually we have other clips from the night before this, TWO days before the Convoy officially began, where already people had gathered at Parliament Hill in extreme cold and stood out on the sidewalks to let the Trudeau government know we were on to it.

People could take the day off work. Use a sick or vacation day, or just explain that its an actual religious/national holiday for you, and while you do not expect to be paid for it, you demand to be allowed not to work that day, and will fight back against any punishment levied against you should they try. I’m sure we could crowd fund a class action against government and employers who would not let you take that day off.

Eventually they would have to simply accept that we have created our own national holiday. And given the effects around the world, and even now in real time as I type, in Brazil, MILLIONS are lining the streets and countless trucks are shutting the country down till they allow a free and fair election.

The fix is in in Brazil. But maybe it won’t stick. Maybe, the Truckers and Amer-Indians in Brazil and all who are fighting back might force a fair election. And if that happens, maybe Americans, Canadians, the British can do the same.

Freedom Day. January 29 every year. A people’s holiday till they find a way to slime it away from us and make it a tool of tyrants. Then we start again.

 

VIDEOS: Brazilian elections determined to be fraudulent by forensics, Liberal party asks for a redo

Posted on by — 4 Comments ↓

First, please click through to RAIR Foundation and read the article and watch the related videos, only one of which is below. This is one of those enormously important stories that is not being reported on MSM because of its obvious implications for recent US events and one in 2020 as well.

Speaking of recent events in the US of A:

Anyone remember the election in Austria where they first tried out the mail in ballots scam? It was so obviously cheated that when the leftist parties won based solely on mail ins, they had to cancel the election and have a do-over. We covered that at Vlad and Gates of Vienna at the time. I don’t recall if we recognized it as a dry run for all Western nations subsequent to that. (If you look up the Austrian election of 2016, you will find that there were enough fraudulent results that they had a do over. But the names and parties don’t seem to match up with what we covered at the time. Still trying to sort that one out Either way the election was cheated with mail ins, and they had to re do it.)

Then we have what just was declared in the state of Berlin Germany, which may have implications for the whole country in its recent election.

From Breitbart News:

90 Days to Re-Run Poll: Berlin Elections Ruled Completely Invalid by Court Over Irregularities

2021 elections in the German capital of Berlin have been ruled invalid by the city’s constitutional court on Wednesday, with Berlin now legally required to re-run the whole vote within 90 days.

Elections for the Berlin Senate must be completely re-run within the next 90 days, the city’s constitutional court has decided, ruling that a previous ballot held last year was completely invalid due to a whole host of election discrepancies.

Questions also remain over the city’s handling of the German general elections which were held at the same time, with it now looking likely that at least some constituencies within the city will have to repeat the polling process again due to irregularities the first time round.

So one gets the idea that maybe there is an international plot to steal elections by fraudulent means for leftist ambitions of total global destruction of individual liberties. Just maybe.

 

Fetterman “won” the Senate race for Pennsylvania

Posted on by — 3 Comments ↓

Congratulations to Pennsylvania! New licence plates are awesome!

As is totally predictable, dialectic media is claiming that opposing someone not mentally fit for office is bigotry. That because he clearly cannot think or speak clearly, is not grounds to vote against him, setting aside the fact that when he was mayor of a city he trashed the place into the ground with his policies. This means a few things. For one, it means they now have a fully remote controlled Senator. There is no way he has the strength of will or character to set or make policy happen against the will of the deep state.

For another, it means that the Democrats can get a ham sandwich elected, by hook or by crook. Put another way, it means the Democrats can run Jeffery Epstein, and if anyone objects, they can call you racist against the metabolically challenged. Totally overriding any real objection to the nature of the man or his crimes. All that matters is you’re a racist for saying a dead man can’t be in the Senate.

Below is a segment of a chat with The Baron from Gates of Vienna from last night before any results where in, about the need for the Democrats to place Fetterman in power:

you know the thing that Theodore Dalrymple said, about the lies of the communist state being as much about humiliation as anything else?

That is, that it’s humiliating to be forced to repeat an obvious lie as the truth. Which is a large part of the point, the humiliation. 

“Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.” 

Fetterman is running in Pennsylvania, where one of the best vote fraud machines is in place, mostly in greater Philadelphia.

Making Fetterman win would be like the obvious Lie

biggest lie of all.

I think there is a lot of food for thought in that observation.

Lastly, there is Fetterman’s ideology itself apart from his disability. (A word which when broken down means, not able, or someone who cannot do.)

Check out the tattoo on his right forearm:

 Although it is also a quote from an excellent song from Nine Inch Nails, it is also a statement of intent. For those uncertain of the nature or origin of the intent, or with whom he shares that intent, please read this important article from Canada’s National Post about former governor of the Bank of England, and The Bank of Canada, Mark Carney.

A small excerpt:

Carney draws inspiration from, among others, Marx, Engels and Lenin, but the agenda he promotes differs from Marxism in two key respects. First, the private sector is not to be expropriated but made a “partner” in reshaping the economy and society. Second, it does not make a promise to make the lives of ordinary people better, but worse. Carney’s Brave New World will be one of severely constrained choice, less flying, less meat, more inconvenience and more poverty: “Assets will be stranded, used gasoline powered cars will be unsaleable, inefficient properties will be unrentable,” he promises.

UPDATE: Many years ago, I promised myself I would no longer make jokes of logical extreme. That is when you hear about something and then you make a crack about how ‘next thing you know, they will launch a Tesla into space with a mannequin in the drivers seat’ or some similar absurd thing that one might think could never happen.

Mistakenly I did in this article. I talked about the Democrats running a dead person and winning. That was a mistake.