Category Archives: Islam

So about those grants to Muslim groups…

Posted on by

The story at Spencer Fernando:

A number of disturbing guest speakers, and serious concerns over an attendee who was jailed for trying to join Islamic State, has led the Canada Revenue Agency to revoke the charitable status of the Ottawa Islamic Centre.

Here’s what the CRA said about the Ottawa Islamic Centre Assalam Mosque:

“Many of the views expressed by the organization’s speakers are misogynistic, homophobic, racist and/or promote violence.”

Additionally, according to Global News, “The CRA was also concerned that “radicalized individuals” had attended the mosque, one of whom, Ashton Larmond, is now imprisoned for attempting to join the so-called Islamic State.”

Download the report here:

The Rebel asks some excellent questions, after doing the research all media should have been doing.

related:

 

 

 

Dutch MP makes suicide video, explains actions

Posted on by

Oz-Rita found and translated the following from a German news site:

Death of an Islam critic rouses the Netherlands

Willie Dille claimed to have been raped and threatened by Muslims. Then she took her own life. However, there is no evidence, nor did she press charges. The case remains a mystery.

From our correspondent HELMUT HETZEL
08/09/2018 at 18:04

The Hague. In the middle of the summer break, a political tragedy is taking place in The Hague. Prominent PVV politician Willie Dille took her own life on Wednesday evening, her family announced on Thursday. The mother of four became 53 years old.

Willie Dille had dominated the headlines in the Netherlands hours before her death after placing a video on her Facebook page. In it she claimed she had been raped by a group of Muslims a year ago. She had been silent for a long time. But now she was being threatened by Moroccans. She was to be gagged. “They came to my car and said we will slit your throat (….) I am now also afraid for my children that something could be done to them. That’s why I’m talking now. They want to muzzle me.”

Her video triggered a heated debate and many reactions in the social and established media. Those who supported Dille had called for an investigation into the allegations of rape and the threat to the politician. Because Willie Dille accused Arnoud van Doorn in particular of having commissioned the rape and the threat from extreme Muslims. The converted Doorn is currently chairman of the Islamic Party in The Hague, but was formerly a PVV member and in this capacity an employee of Dille.

She had fired him, though. “He hates me,” Dille said in her video. Doorn announced in a Twitter message that he might accuse Dille of slander and libel.

Critics claimed Willie Dille invented rape to denigrate Muslims. Dille was a strong critic of Islam, like most politicians and members of the Freedom Party PVV, which was founded by the Islam critic Geert Wilders.

One will probably never know whether Dille was actually raped by Muslims or not. But the Hague police reported after her death that she had not filed a rape charge. This raises questions about the credibility of Dilles’ accounts, critics say.

Geert Wilders himself expressed his condolences to the von Dille family on Thursday and twittered: “She was a fantastic colleague who always watched out for her fellow men, especially for the youth. Her loss cannot be described in words. We will miss her enormously. We wish her partner and her children a lot of strength.”

Fox News has the story here as well

C has provided us with details and corrections on this important and WAY under-reported story.

Small correction, she was an ex-MP. Left parliament in 2012, was active in the Hague’s city council after that.
Police says she didn’t file charges, but she did talk to them about the alleged rape. There wasn’t enoug to start a case, according to the DA.
The man she claims was behind it, Arnoud van Doorn, is indeed a nasty piece of work. Did time for selling drugs to minors and possession of a firearm. Converted in the As Soennah mosque (the Hague), a salafist hotbed. Suddenly drove around in expensive cars.. Has ties with Qatar and Kuwait, and the Saudi royal house. Mediator between mosques and donors worldwide, a kind of glorified money mule. Says he wants less transparency when it comes to funding: “we want to be more shady”. A short expose (in dutch):

 

Thank you C.

For the second time in a month, a mosque has been de-platformed for hate speech. This time in Ottawa

Posted on by

We saw it in a Danish mosque a few weeks ago, when they arrested an imam for inciting genocide and now in Ottawa, a major South-East end mosque, the Ottawa Islamic Centre, has lost its charitable status for fully predictable reasons. It is still a long long way from what would happen to any other organization that preached genocide, group hate, supremacy and sedition, but its a hell of a lot more than any of us ever thought would happen to any islamic group. Especially one where, I SUSPECT Trudeau visited and gave one of his semi-comprehensible

From Spencer Fernando:

A number of disturbing guest speakers, and serious concerns over an attendee who was jailed for trying to join Islamic State, has led the Canada Revenue Agency to revoke the charitable status of the Ottawa Islamic Centre.

Here’s what the CRA said about the Ottawa Islamic Centre Assalam Mosque:

“Many of the views expressed by the organization’s speakers are misogynistic, homophobic, racist and/or promote violence.”

Additionally, according to Global News, “The CRA was also concerned that “radicalized individuals” had attended the mosque, one of whom, Ashton Larmond, is now imprisoned for attempting to join the so-called Islamic State.”

The CRA decision stripping the mosque of their charitable status took effect on July 14.

Here’s a key section a report on the CRA’s findings:

“The CRA documents (available below) singled out Abu Usamah At-thahabi, Bilal Philips, Hakkeem Quick and Saed Rageah — all of whom had spoken at the Ottawa mosque one or more times.

(More at Spencer’s excellent site)

This is a really interesting and important story. The report explains this is a serious problem across Canada, which this site has exposed on more than one, more than10 occasions, with incitements to genocide, and every other form of hate crime by socialist Canada standards, and plain old Koran by Islamic ones.

 

100 rockets from Gaza

Posted on by

Paul Weston asks some very important questions concerning the Govt. treatment of Tommy Robinson

Posted on by

No matter who Tommy is, and no matter what he has or has not done, his treatment by the state in terms of the procedure which jailed him recently, and his treatment in prison, violated the letter and spirit of democratic law, worldwide. Like Kevin Krehan before him, who it would appear the state had murdered in prison for the crime of littering near a mosque, the British government forced conditions on Tommy far worse than any murderer or terrorist within the penal system in the UK I would bet.

Also the state has been caught actually lying about it to try and cover up their mistreatment of Tommy R. Tommy has published video of the letter they sent him detailing the exact treatment they did to him, which they recently denied.

At this time there is no excuse for lack of solidarity behind Tommy Robinson. Leftist media would be chanting in the streets if an actual criminal had been treated this way. He would be a cause célèbre for sure.

Here is Vice Chairman of the Conservative party of Great Britain referring to Tommy Robinson as “vile” in a bullying session of an employee of Google’s Youtube, demanding he condemn videos he has not seen and was unaware of.

In the comments under this video, here and here, we were made aware of what this committee is, who the people are, and most importantly, the lie that Tommy’s videos “radicalized” a British man into a minor attack at the Finsbury Mosque, the mosque where the hook handed preacher, Abu Hamza made home.

In fact, what did anger this citizen into action against a seditious and hate spewing mosque which should not exist at all according to the EU and UK’s own “hate speech” laws, was a BBC drama-documentary called Three Girls.

It is in three parts, but you can see parts 1, and Part 2 here. Part three will likely be added sometime soon.

UPDATE: Paul Weston made a correction to one error in the top video:

Paul Weston
4 days ago
I made a glaring error unfortunately, courtesy of Wikipedia….. Darren Hughes is no longer Governer of HMP Onley, the new Governer is a Mr Matthew Tilt.

Thank you Oz-Rita for your help on this.

 

British government bullies witness from Youtube over Tommy Robinson videos

Posted on by

Does anyone else think that an official from the British government should not be trying to force a witness to pass judgement on video he has never seen and is totally unaware of? Is this what democracy has devolved into?

March 13, 2018. Hearings on extremist and radicalizing videos on Youtube. UK

H/T Oz-Rita

UPDATE:

Simon Platt left this critical information in the comments:

Some minor points of correction: this isn’t Her Majesty’s Government, but the Home Affairs Select Committee. That’s a committee of members of parliament, not government ministers, whose principal role is to hold the Home Office (a government department) to account.

The Pakistani bully was Rehman Chishti, who, believe it or not, is not just any old “Conservative” MP but a Vice Chairman of the “Conservative” Party.

In respect of that, it might interest readers to know that an article written by Boris Johnson, favourite to succeed Theresa May as Conservative leader and Prime Minister, an article that appeared yesterday in a Conservative-supporting newspaper, the Daily Telegraph, has led to demands for an apology from the Islamophobic Conservative Party Chairman, Brandon Lewis. Johnson’s crime: he wrote that he thought Denmark had gone too far with its recent “burka ban”, and that the UK shouldn’t follow suit, much as Johnson disliked the niqab (common on our streets) and burka (almost never seen). If I remember correctly, the offending word Johnson used was “weird”.

The other point of correction I wanted to make has already been made but is worth repeating: it wasn’t Tommy Robinson who “radicalised” Darren Osbourne. It was the BBC.

Thank you Simon.

DJ Added this comment:

Darren Osbourne stated at his trial that the BBC miniseries 3 Girls about Muslim rape gangs in Rochdale was what made him attack.

It did the same for many of us, we just haven’t reached his stage yet.
Travelling to work on the Tube on 7/7 with my wife thinking I was dead for an hour did the same for me,even though I didn’t even hear a bomb explode.

Daniel Hannah made the point recently that we English are quiet snorkelling for a very long time until suddenly we flip into a cold determination to do something. The best example is our passivity towards Germany in the 30s followed by our change in 1939 when we declared war.

Thank you DJ.

Does anyone know if 3 Girls is still available online? If not, I would attempt to put it on Bitchutte if there is an interest in seeing it.

 

Pro-freedom liberal groups expected to clash with fascistic communist groups in Portland this weekend

Posted on by

Sooner or later, we have to start taking back the language of reality. The PoMos have pretty much got everyone repeating the opposite of the truth like a mantra. Calling communist groups who seek to shut down everyone else’s freedom of expression, “Anti-fascists” is an absurdity tantamount to calling the Nazi party the faery unicorn rainbow party.

So using a reality decryption template, have a look at this AP article:

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Portland, Oregon, is bracing for what could be another round of violent clashes between a right-wing group and self-described anti-fascist counterprotesters who have pledged to keep Patriot Prayer and other affiliated groups out of this ultra-liberal city.

 

A rally organized Saturday by Patriot Prayer leader Joey Gibson was expected to be the third to roil Portland this summer. Two previous events ended in bloody fistfights and riots, and one counterprotester was sent to the hospital with a skull fracture.

 

This time, Gibson changed the venue from a federal plaza outside U.S. District Court to a waterfront park so some of his Oregon supporters can carry concealed weapons as they demonstrate. Chartered buses will bring participants from Vancouver, Washington — where Gibson lives — to downtown Portland with armed security on board.

The Portland Police Bureau said Friday that protesters should expect to see a significant police presence including bomb-sniffing dogs and checkpoints where weapon screenings will occur.

 

Gibson’s insistence on bringing his right-wing supporters repeatedly to this blue city has crystallized a debate about the limits of free speech in an era of stark political division. Patriot Prayer also has held rallies in many other cities around the U.S. West, including Berkeley, California, that have drawn violent reactions.

 

But the Portland events have taken on outsized significance after a Patriot Prayer sympathizer was charged with fatally stabbing two men who came to the defense of two young black women — one in a hijab — whom the attacker was accused of harassing on a light-rail train in May 2017.

Yeah well. I would like to see it for myself. Hopefully this weekend we will get some decent reports on what is going on there. But from the videos I have seen from Portland recently, as well as from these kinds of demos everywhere for years now, universally it is ANTIFA that initiate violence.

They justify it by pretending that words equals violence, and so words they do not agree with is violence against them, so using actual violence against both the speakers and listeners of ideas with which they do not agree, is self defence.

Interestingly, this is an exact analogue for the Islamic concept of, “Defending the faith”, where anyone not submitting to sharia or Islamic norms is offending the faith of Islam, which holds as a central tenet that all must submit to Islamic rule. Therefore, resistance to Islamic rule is an attack on Islamic faith and so this gives them the ‘right’ to “defend the faith”.