Category Archives: Norway

AS OSLO UNIVERSITY PREPARES TO DISCUSS POSSIBLE BOYCOTT OF ISRAEL, AN EXCHANGE BETWEEN THE JCPA CHAIRMAN AND RECTOR

Posted on by

The Tundra Tabloids has obtained an email by Professor Leslie Wagner, chairman of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs’s Institute for Global Jewish Affairs, that was sent to the rector of the University of Oslo, Ole Petter Ottersen, Professor MD, PhD. The Tundra Tabloids has full permission to reprint the exchange between these two professors. KGS

NOTE: It’s good to know that the rector of the university is fully against such a boycott, let alone the discussion of one.

Correspondence:

Dear Professor Otterson,
I appreciate your prompt reply to my previous communication, and welcome your statement of your personal position regarding the boycott proposal. It is unfortunate from the university’s point of view that any member of the Board can make proposals, however damaging they may be to the good name of the university. I wish you success in mobilising the support of the Board for your position on this issue.
Leslie Wagner

Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:55:29 -0700
From: ol****@***oo.com
Subject: Re: [rektor] Boycott
To: re****@*io.no; vc******@*****il.com
CC: in*********@*******io.no; r.********@*****io.no; g.*************@*******io.no

Dear Dr Wagner,
Thank you for your mail regarding academic boycott. Please rest assured that the leadership of the university of Oslo is united behind its firm opposition to any form of academic boycott. The reason why this issue is to be discussed at the upcoming board meeting is a technical one: One of the board members insisted that the issue of boycott be brought to the board and the current rules then dictate that this wish has to be accommodated. For your information we can tell you that we have actively promoted our view in the press and declared that academic boycott is not a way to go in any conflict of this kind. In fact, the leadership of the university argues for a more active use of science diplomacy in conflicts where diplomatic contacts break down or prove inefficient.
I hope this helps clarify this issue. In short, we share your views on the harmful effects of academic boycott and trust that our board will rule against such a step with an overwhelming majority.
Ole Petter Ottersen, Professor MD, PhD
Rector, University of Oslo (http://www.uio.no/)

From: leslie wagner
To: re****@*io.no
Sent: Sun, June 20, 2010 10:46:53 PM
Subject: [rektor] Boycott

Dear Jan Petter Ottersen,
I write to you as a former vice chancellor of 2 British universities and a former chancellor of a third to express my shock that the University of Oslo is to consider a proposal to boycott Israeli universities and academics. Such political gestures have no place in academic discourse, and particularly at a university with the reputation of the University of Oslo.
That reputation can only be damaged, perhaps irrevocably, within the international academic community, if Oslo decides to judge which academics it will recognise on the basis of their passports rather than their academic merit. I urge you to do all in your power to prevent your university going down a route which not only breaches the core principles of academic life, but which will also do great and lasting harm to your fine institution.

Yours sincerely

Professor Leslie Wagner CBE

THE HUMANITARIAN RACIST NORWEGIAN LEFT SMEARS HUMANITARIAN BRUCE BAWER AS A RACIST

Posted on by

 

Norway is a Scandinavian Orwellian nightmare, where racism assumes the mantle of humanitarianism, anti-Israelism/Jew hatred is championed by “philosemites”, truth is falsehood and injustice the rule of law.  Norway, having been so thoroughly corrupted over the decades by far Leftist governments, can’t tell the light of Summer’s day from the darkest of Winter’s nights. Simply put, Norway is a gross caricature of a western liberal democracy.

Enter Bruce Bawer. Here’s a man who has championed the rights of women, vocally defended the need to safeguard their rights, and the rights of all citizens of Norway, at the forefront of ensuring that children are not victimized, and yet, he’s being branded a “waycist”. It’s because of his insistence on naming the name “that shall not be mentioned”, the ideology of Islam, as being the prime motivating factor in the victimization of immigrants in Norway.

It’s not ethnic Norwegians who are victimizing young girls with female genital mutilation (FGM) or forcing the women folk, in most cases young girls, to be married, or forcibly keeping their females under lock and key, brutalizing gays or promoting rioting in the streets for whatever grievances real or imagined or overly represented in the crime rate, like in the rape statistics etc..

No, Muslims are the ones guilty of that, and saying so isn’t an act of racism, but the speaking of the truth. So now the Orwellian (and humanitarian racist) Norwegian state has cast its eye upon the next victim, for daring to utter the truth about its society. Finland has Jussi Halla-aho, The Netherlands has Geert Wilders, Austria has Susanne Winter, and now Norway has Bruce Bawer. Let Bruce fill you in on the situation.

H/T Fjordman
When it comes to the right to speak one’s mind about Islam, the record of the last few years makes it clear which direction the West is moving in. In France and Italy, Oriana Fallaci is put on trial for disparaging Islam. In Canada, Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant are hauled before “human rights commission” tribunals for criticizing Islam in print. In Australia, an Islamic organization sues two pastors for “vilification of Muslims.” In Britain, a Daily Telegraph columnist is arrested on charges of hate speech for having written negatively about Islam, and the Archbishop of Canterbury proposes that Parliament pass stronger laws against such speech acts. And in the Netherlands, Geert Wilders, the head of the Freedom Party, which performed so well in the June 9 general elections that Wilders may end up in the governing coalition, still faces trial for having made a film about the Koranic foundations of terrorism.

Then there’s Norway, where I live, and where the last few days have seen yet another dark development. By way of background, permit me to begin by quoting myself. On pages 230-31 of my book Surrender: Appeasing Islam, Sacrificing Freedom I sum up the more alarming aspects of Norway’s Discrimination Law, passed in 2005:
It forbids “harassment on the grounds of ethnicity, national origin, ancestry, skin color, language, religion, or beliefs,” and, in turn, defines harassment as “actions, omissions, or utterances [my emphasis] that have the effect or are intended to have the effect of being insulting, intimidating, hostile, degrading, or humiliating.”

In other words, it’s illegal just to say certain things.

Defendants may be accused not only by the individuals whom they’ve supposedly offended but also by semiofficial organs such as the Anti-Racist Center and the Center against Ethnic Discrimination (both of which helped formulate the law, and both of which exist less to oppose real racism and discrimination than to oppose political incorrectness generally) or by the government’s Equality and Anti-Discrimination Ombud.

Which means that a handful of far-left organizations have been given enormous power to silence those they disagree with.

Violations of the law by individuals are punishable by fine; violations by individuals in concert with at least two other persons (such as a writer conspiring with an editor and publisher, perhaps?) can be punished by up to three years’ imprisonment — this in a country where murderers often get off with less. Moreover, the burden of proof is on the accused: you’re guilty until proven innocent.

And this in a supposedly free country.

Which brings us to the most recent developments. Over the years, I’ve had a close association with Human Rights Service (HRS), a small Oslo-based foundation that formulates and proposes government policies designed to combat the subjection and abuse of females in Muslim communities. I’ve translated materials for HRS and written pieces in Norwegian for the HRS website. Last fall, after suggesting that HRS expand its site to include articles in English by contributors from around Europe and elsewhere — so that writers from different countries could compare notes, as it were, about their experiences with Islam, immigration, and integration — I began working regularly for HRS, writing, soliciting, and translating pieces for their new international web pages.

Meanwhile HRS was going through a rough patch. Ever since its establishment in 2001, it has been despised by many people on the Norwegian left — the same folks who hate Israel and who feel warmly about Hamas. The two women who run HRS, Hege Storhaug and Rita Karlsen, have labored tirelessly against monstrous practices like honor killing, forced marriage, and female genital mutilation, and for doing so have won the lifelong gratitude of countless Muslim girls and women — but as far as their PC enemies are concerned, to condemn any aspect of Islam is to be an Islamophobe, pure and simple. Last summer, a couple of newspapers, the far-left Dagbladet and the Communist Klassekampen, waged a brutal and breathtakingly mendacious smear campaign against HRS, the obvious intent of which was to bring it down once and for all.

Read it all here.

“And this in a supposedly free country” -Bruce Bawer

Posted on by
June 15, 2010 Pajamas Media

When it comes to the right to speak one’s mind about Islam, the record of the last few years makes it clear which direction the West is moving in. In France and Italy, Oriana Fallaci is put on trial for disparaging Islam. In Canada, Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant are hauled before “human rights commission” tribunals for criticizing Islam in print. In Australia, an Islamic organization sues two pastors for “vilification of Muslims.” In Britain, a Daily Telegraph columnist is arrested on charges of hate speech for having written negatively about Islam, and the Archbishop of Canterbury proposes that Parliament pass stronger laws against such speech acts.  And in the Netherlands, Geert Wilders, the head of the Freedom Party, which performed so well in the June 9 general elections that Wilders may end up in the governing coalition, still faces trial for having made a film about the Koranic foundations of terrorism.

Then there’s Norway, where I live, and where the last few days have seen yet another dark development. By way of background, permit me to begin by quoting myself.  On pages 230-31 of my book Surrender: Appeasing Islam, Sacrificing Freedom I sum up the more alarming aspects of Norway’s Discrimination Law, passed in 2005:

It forbids “harassment on the grounds of ethnicity, national origin, ancestry, skin color, language, religion, or beliefs,” and, in turn, defines harassment as “actions, omissions, or utterances [my emphasis] that have the effect or are intended to have the effect of being insulting, intimidating, hostile, degrading, or humiliating.”

In other words, it’s illegal just to say certain things.

Defendants may be accused not only by the individuals whom they’ve supposedly offended but also by semiofficial organs such as the Anti-Racist Center and the Center against Ethnic Discrimination (both of which helped formulate the law, and both of which exist less to oppose real racism and discrimination than to oppose political incorrectness generally) or by the government’s Equality and Anti-Discrimination Ombud.

Which means that a handful of far-left organizations have been given enormous power to silence those they disagree with.

Violations of the law by individuals are punishable by fine; violations by individuals in concert with at least two other persons (such as a writer conspiring with an editor and publisher, perhaps?) can be punished by up to three years’ imprisonment — this in a country where murderers often get off with less. Moreover, the burden of proof is on the accused: you’re guilty until proven innocent.

And this in a supposedly free country.

Please click here for the rest:

REPORTS ON DISCRIMINATION OF ETHNIC NORWEGIANS AND VIOLENCE AND THREATS OF SCHOOL STAFF IN NORWAY

Posted on by
The Tundra Tabloids receives a hat tip to the following two stories concerning a Norwegian girl who’s happy to rediscover her identity after having to move away from an area where she was victimized for being an ethnic Norwegian, and about the rise in violence and threats towards employees in Oslo schools.

The situation in Norway is slipping fast from bad to desperate, as everyday people are being forced by their situations to come and speak openly about how dire things actually are. Just this past March the TT reported about a NRK report about how widespread anti-Semitic attitudes were amongst the Muslim immigrant community in Norway.

Teachers would only allow themselves to be interviewed anonymously for fear of their lives. Here are a couple of articles that show just how far the situation in Norway has been allowed to deteriorate. Really shocking. KGS

Esther from Islam in Europe blog kindly informs the Tundra Tabloids that she translated the article into English, so the TT reposts the translation, in part, and provides this link back to Esther’s site for the rest. Many thanks to Esther for the work. KGS

Bullied because she is white

Blond again: Only after moving to a school in western Oslo did Mari Morken (16) dare be blond again.

“Why is it racism is we call them ‘black’ and not racism if they call us ‘white'”?

“I never called anybody ‘Nigger’ or ‘Black’ or anything like that. On the other hand, those of us who were White were talked about derogatorily. It was negative to be White, Christianity and Norwegian culture was negative and there were many curses,” says Mari Morken (16) and rattles them off “Whitey, potato and white cheese”
Three years ago she couldn’t take it any more. She moved from a school in Groruddalen to a school on the west side. Every morning she takes the subway to the other side of the city to escape the curses and the bad class-environment. Where she goes now, it’s good to have good grades, and she doesn’t stand out because she’s light. Before she made dark stripes in her medium-blond hair. Now she dyes her hair a bit lighter. She’s in the process of ‘taking back’ her Norwegianity, and is happy to be blond without being branded ‘whore’ and cheap’.
“Ah, girl, blond whore!”
‘Josephine’ was met with these words on the first school day at a high-school in an immigrant-dominated suburb south of Stockholm. Josphine was quite baffled, since aside from her hair color there was nothing about her appearance that would indicate she was promiscuous. She didn’t use makeup and had completely neutral clothing. It was exclusively her hair-color that branded her a ‘whore’.
‘Josephine’ is one of the informants for researchers Maria Bäckman, who did an ethnographic field study in a suburb south of Stockholm, where ethnic Swedes make up about 20% of the population. They’re therefore a minority. Klassekampen met Bäckman this week when she visited the University in Oslo and the Culcom research program (cultural complexity in the new Norway). She’s the first in Sweden who researched ethnic Swedes as a minority. A similar study was not done in Norway.
“In the suburbs the invisible Swedishness become visible. Ethnic Swedes experience being defined and labeled by their culture and religion, similarly with minorities of a different background,” Bäckman told Klassekampen.
In her study she focused on ethnic Swedish girls. They experience being linked to the notion of free, Swedish sexuality, which in the densely immigrant suburbs is not necessarily linked with something positive. The strategy for the suburb girls was therefore to play down their Swedish identity.
“Several dyed their hair. Not necessarily because they wanted to look like immigrants, but because they didn’t want to look so Swedish,” says Bäckman.
“Yes, it’s typical, Exactly like that.” Mari Morken nodded vigorously to us from the other side of the cafe table when we repeated some of what Maria Bäckman has found out. “I was called a whore so many times, I became immune.”
We meet her and her mother, Kristin Pedersen, for a talk about why Mari changed schools. They tell of systematic bullying and harassment since Mari reached puberty when she was 10-11, till she transferred school when she was 13.
Pedersen is still upset at the school’s lack of handling of the case.

Read the rest here at Islam in Europe. (Thanks Esther)

80 percent of violent athletes are children between 13 and 16 years.

We see some of the weapons confiscated at Etterstad skole in Oslo (75% male students, 55% of foreign origin). Dagbladet also tells of how threats against teachers are on the increase:

[…]

Dagbladet): From 2005 to 2009 the number of reported violence and threats against employees in the Oslo-schools increased from 129 to 224. This is shown by new numbers from the Agency of Education in Oslo municipality ( Utdanningsetaten i Oslo kommune). This holds for “ordinary schools”, and for the special schools the numbers are even higher: From 2005 to 2009 the incidents grew from 322 to 525.

Google trans click here.

 

H/T NIJ

Islam, rape and Norway

Posted on by

Here is a post from Gates of Vienna that needs to be read to get a proper context for the video that Vlad subtitled and posted here about a week or so ago.

From Gates of Vienna:

This story is a year old, but it’s still important and relevant to what we discuss here every day.

In 2009 the Oslo police reported that rape statistics for the past three years showed that none of the rapes in the city were committed by native Norwegians — all were committed by immigrants. The video below is from a report aired on a Norwegian TV news program. Many thanks to TTL for the translation

Our Norwegian correspondent Zylark has translated a contemporaneous newspaper article. Zylark adds these observations:

The article is a good one, but it’s a bit misleading. It states non-Western immigrants are behind all assault rapes, which is true enough, but it is not quite exact. What it should say is: immigrants from Muslim countries are behind all assault rapes.

I dislike the tendency for the mainstream press to lump all non-Western immigrants into one big sack. Non-Westerners from non-Muslim countries integrate perfectly well into our societies. They have their quirks and culture, and that is fine. Quite exciting actually, rather enjoy it. They are decent people, unlike many of the Muslims, who are not.

I would love it if the press managed to grow the [manly equipment] to make that distinction. But I guess it would be racist to say that Indian Hindus are no problem, but Pakistani Muslims are. Never mind that they are essentially the same, ethnically speaking. Only the creed differs.

Below is Zylark’s translation of the article from Dagbladet:

Immigrants behind all reported assault rapes in Oslo

For the last three years according to the police.

All 41 reported assault rapes in Oslo for the last three years were committed by non-Western immigrants, according to the police.

“The perps are relatively young men who come from other countries. They are often asylum-seekers and often from traumatized countries or countries with an entirely different view on women than we have here in Norway,” says Hanne Kristin Rohde, leader of the violence and vice section at the Oslo precinct to NRK [Norwegian Broadcasting Company].

She says the perps are either traumatized or psychologically damaged, or from countries where violence towards women is ordinary.

Brute violence

Men with Kurdish or African background dominate the statistics.

None of the reports involves ethnic Norwegians.

What distinguish the assault rapes are threats or use of brute violence.

– – – – – – – – –

The police think more preventative measures towards men of immigrant background are needed.

[Yes, a course is needed, where one need to tell people rape is wrong. *Sigh*. — translator]

Ole Morten Lyng with the Nordbybråten asylum-reception center agrees.

He emphasizes that nothing can excuse such actions, but that it is important to understand the situation the assailants are in, in order to prevent such incidents in the future.

“Politicians are afraid”

The leader of the resource center for immigrant and refugee women, Fakhra Salimi, passes the ball to the politicians.

She claims preventative work amongst men with minority background is entirely lacking, and says the politicians are afraid to tackle the problem. Continue Reading →

Norwegian TV reports on violent rape of women by immigrants.

Posted on by

The statistics here are quite alarming. of the past 41 investigated “Brutally violent” rapes, 100% are from immigrants of particular backgrounds while 0% are from the indigenous Norwegian men.

Below, notes from the translator on the origins of this clip:

It is from the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK), a Norwegian public equivalent of the British BBC. (It is as such, largely a leftist biased TV station), but I increasingly see what i believe to be “the tide turning” regarding immigration issues. As you have seen, they report on Muslim antisemitism and such also, which is unheard of in countries as especially Sweden.) The story you have is from 15 April 2009 apparently. (http://www1.nrk.no/nett-tv/indeks/167454)

If Norwegian TV can go this far, the truth must be far far worse, given Norway’s state of advanced dhimmitude. This short news clip details 41 brutal violent rapes of Norwegian women by “African and Turkish” men, however the tie that binds I would be willing to bet, is Islam. I bet none of the Africans where Christians for example. It is interesting that far-left Norwegian TV elected to go with a truly racist spin on this issue, rather than dare breach the taboo of Islam, the likely real motive for this behaviour as Islam preaches that non-Muslim women are wanton sluts typically, and war-booty as well, “What your right hand possesses” etc.

Islam is a specific ideology and as such, does motivate behaviour while race may or may not, but even if it does, its to an infinitely lesser extent. It stuns me that so many leftists will use true racism such as this, in order to avoid the appearance of what in fact is fake racism, criticism of Islam.

Life for many Norwegians in Norway.

Posted on by

For those of you that have Fox Lingo in firefox, or any other translation software on their browser, have a look at this. The left has reached it’s logical conclusion in Norway. Where racism is bad, but affirmative action is good, it is absolutely certain that active hatred of white people will be fine and any attempt to resist it is racism.

The left love to play word games. As if somehow, affirmative action is not racism. Well, I hope they like the results. Scratch that, I’m certain they do. This is after all, what they where after.

Tundra Tabloids does a report on this in English here.

Which reminds me of another video from Scandinavia on the same subject. One which was pulled from youtube even though thousands of ‘kill the jew’ videos remain there. (I do not blame youtube for that, chances are they don’t have enough Dutch and Arabic speakers to deal)

MANFRED GERSTENFELD GETS BROADSIDED BY THE UNETHICAL JOURNALISTIC PRACTICES OF NORWAY’S SIDSEL WOLD

Posted on by

Sidsel Wold: Journalistic ethics? 
I never let them stop me

This Norwegian woman is beneath contempt, and as the Tundra Tabloids fears, sadly represents what is considered the best of the best in Norwegian journalism. The Tundra Tabloids remembers how the two radical leftist activist doctors of, Gilberts and Fosse, received a standing ovation from the press corps during the unvealing of their (then) new book about the Gaza war in 09′. As far as the TT has been able to ascertain, only the Sec-Gen of the Norwegian Press Association, Per Edgar Kokkvold, voiced any criticism of the open display of partisanship by the Norwegian media.

So it shouldn’t come as a surprise then, that a Norwegian journalist who covers the ME beat in Israel for Norwegian state radio, NRK, Sidsel Wold, resorts to the very same contemptuous journalistic behavior that apparently has become the norm for those plying that trade in Norway. According to the Norway, Israel and the Jews blog, in a recent interview with the JCPA’s Manfred Gerstenfeld, who edited “Behind the Humanitarian Mask”:

After an interview with a Norwegian journalist he (Manfred Gerstenfeld) was misquoted throughout the Scandinavian peninsula and subsequently ridiculed and demonized. Last week, he published the Norwegian translation of an updated version of the same book, following which he was interviewed by NRK journalist Sidsel Wold. You find the transcript from the interview below. Notice the following:

1: Throughout the 3 minute interview, Gerstenfeld is allowed to speak only for 20 seconds. After this Sidsel Wold takes over. Instead of Wold asking questions and Gerstenfeld answering, Wold answers her own questions herself.

2: It is unclear when Wold is quoting Gerstenfeld for something he has said, when she is quoting him for something he has written, and when she is just expressing her own personal opinon of what Gerstenfeld really believes.

3: At the end of the interview, Wold concludes by straying onto a completely different issue, suggesting that Israel under Netanyahu’s government is witnessing McCarthyism.

Well, it doesn’t end there. The Tundra Tabloids has received permission from Dr.Gerstenfeld to publish an email he sent to Wold on April 8, 2010, that fully describes the depth, width and breadth of her deception, and manipulation of his words that were spoken in a three minute interview she conducted, in which Dr.Gerstenfeld was allowed to speak for only for 20 seconds.

The article originally published by Sidsel Wold is available in both English and in the original Norwegian viewable below the fold. KGS

8 April 2010
Dear Sidsel,

You informed me that you lost the text of my interview with you and that you have broadcast another text which you call an “interview” with me, a copy of which you have sent me.
I gave the text of this so-called “interview” with me to a Norwegian acquaintance of mine to transcribe and translate, (for full text, see below).

What emerges is that this so-called “interview” is, in fact, a mix of the following three elements:

a) some quotes of mine, where I speak for a very short period;

b) several statements which you attribute to me, a substantial number of which I never made and are your inventions;

c) your own remarks which, to different extents, it is unclear to the listener whether they are yours or mine.

The Ethics Code of the Society of Professional Journalists states that journalists should “Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise care to avoid inadvertent error. Deliberate distortion is never permissible.” Your text flagrantly breaks these rules.

Examples of false quotes attributed by you to me:

I did not say that all Norwegian bishops are out to get Israel with the exception of one. I could not say that as I have read about the position of four bishops in total, three of who are against Israel.

I did not specifically name any Israeli NGOs which spread hatred of Israel. This subject is the specialized domain of NGO Monitor and I did not enter into details on this subject. As far as I know NGO Monitor does not claim that all the organizations you mention are spreading hate of Israel. The insertion of the names, in what are supposedly quotes of mine read out by you in the interview, are falsifications. You inserted the names of the organizations on your own initiative

I did not say that most of the journalists and academia are out to get Israel. Indeed, many journalists who deal with Israel are anti-Israeli and in the academia there are key figures and others who are extreme anti-Israelis.

I did not say that the aim of these anti-Israelis is to hit the Jews. Their aim is to hit Israel.

I did not say that Norway is credible. What I said is that Norway has “the image of being credible”, which is something radically different.

You say in the broadcast text:

“He believes that those who criticize Israel today are anti-Semites and that Norwegian elites are the worst of them all. Yes, Norway is the spearhead of the world when it comes to disseminating of Jew-hatred, illegitimate anti-Israeli criticism, he believes.”

This is a radically false construction made by you which has nothing to do with what I believe. You have manipulated a variety of texts, which you attribute to me, and on the basis these manipulations you falsely construct my “beliefs.”

When you lost the tape you had a number of honest options:

1) not to broadcast the interview;

2) try to contact me in Norway which was not all that difficult. You could have called my secretary or my home for my contact details;

3) accurately quote texts from my book Behind the Humanitarian Mask, Israel and the Jews, The Nordic Countries, Israel and the Jews, a copy of which I gave you.

You chose a fourth option: to produce a constructed text which contained a large number of fallacies, air them during a short broadcast, and attribute them to me. I now wish be given equal air time, in which only my words will be broadcast, in answer to questions without any independent comments by you.

If I do not receive a satisfactory answer from you before 11 April 2010, I will feel free to take any steps I deem necessary.

As this correspondence concerns an item which was broadcast and was aired in the public domain, I do not consider the contents confidential.

Yours sincerely
Manfred Gerstenfeld

Editor’s note: She did not reply.
Continue Reading →

DR.MANFRED GERSTENFELD’S PREDICTION ABOUT MALMÖ AND OSLO COMES TRUE SOONER THAN EXPECTED

Posted on by
Dr.Manfred Gerstenfeld, Chairman of the Board of Fellows at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, while speaking during a press conference in Oslo (24.03.2010) for his recently released book “Anti-Semitism in Norway”, made the following prolific near-perfect prediction:
“The problems of Malmö as a European capital of hatred had been known to experts for four years at least. Now they suddenly are widely known internationally. Will Oslo be the next Malmö? In my opinion what happens here concerning anti-Israelism and anti-semitism will reach the international press in six months to two years. Whether you want to solve the problem before, the Norwegians have to decide themselves. Thank you for your attention.”

Concerning the city of Malmö, the hub of Muslim immigration and anti-Semitism in Sweden and that of Oslo, the dear doctor made only a slight mistake in his forecast, in fact it took only less than a week. Here is an article from the Swiss daily NZZ (Neue Zurcher Zeitung), which is considered one of the leading media in the German language. It equates Norway and Malmö in regards to their anti-Semitism and anti-Israelism. KGS

Aldo Keel ? In Norway television reports about anti-Semitism in schools causes stir.

As a father laments, teenage Muslims would want to hang his son because he was a Jew. A Teacher talks “of” notorious bullying. Hitler was regarded as a “good sport,” the West as a Jewish protectorate. Lessons on the Holocaust would be greeted with derision. TV shows have a bad influence from the Middle East, which can be received via satellite. The station showed scenes of Palestinian children of primary school age, who agreed to kill Jews, if Allah wishes. The Israeli policy has little sympathy in Norway, as once considered as a peacemaker. Recently, even some bishops of the Established Church considered a call for a boycott of Israeli goods. In Norway, there lives 1300 Jews and 150 000 Muslims.

KitmanTV busts Norwegian news of some grand scale anti semetic deception

Posted on by

KitmanTV does an excellent job of following the bread crumbs on this one. Norwegian TV attempts to blame Israel for destroying a sacred Palestinian ‘heritage’ site when in fact it was a building associated with the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hitler’s right hand man in the East, and one of the architects of the final solution.

Below,  the whole documentary about the Grand Mufti and Adolf

The Turban and the Swastika whole film from Vlad Tepes on Vimeo.

Norwegian TV pulls clip from youtube

Posted on by

Here is an interesting little 16 minute video essay about a white Norwegian family that decided to live the multicultural experiment using their son as a Guinea pig.  A youtuber who goes by TheThirdLink decided it was important enough to subtitle in English and post to youtube.

The Norwegian TV station that did this clip made youtube take it down, but interestingly none of the other clips that this same user also had from the station.

In any case it is an important clip. Please watch and spread the link to all you know before it gets pulled from where it is now. Also, please download it for yourselves, if you know how, so that it can be mirrored in future and perhaps sent by email as a smaller clip.

Eeyore for Vlad.

Thanks again to TheThirdLink for contacting me and sending this file:

Antisemitism in Malmo Sweden

Posted on by

Here is the first of two videos recently found on Norwegian media on this issue. This one is an interview with a Jewish family who is moving to Israel. The next, one I hope to have tomorrow, will show teachers who are not even Jewish but who are afraid to show their faces or voices discussing this issue for fear of reprisal from Muslim children who spread violent hate of Jews in schools in Sweden.

Thank you very much KitmanTV for staying up way past any sane hour and working hard to translate this video for us all.

Original videos from this site:

Norway, Islam, and New Protests

Posted on by

From The Brussels Journal

By Filip van Laenen

Last week-end, almost a thousand taxi drivers in the Norwegian capital Oslo and neighboring municipality Bærum went on what could be called a religious strike. Both on Friday evening and Monday morning, Muslim taxi drivers refused to drive in protest against Wednesday’s front page of the Norwegian tabloid paper Dagbladet. That day, the tabloid ran an article about some of the “dangerous” pages the website of the Norwegian security service PST links to, and illustrated that with a screen shot of a cartoon showing the prophet Muhammad as a pig trampling the Qur’an.

Let’s not be naive: the tabloid Dagbladet knew very well that it would create a new controversy when it put the cartoon on its front page. By its very nature, this type of newspaper depends on shocking front pages. Just like its biggest competitor in the market, VG, you can’t get Dagbladet delivered to your door every morning, but have to go out and buy it at a shop. Therefore, its front page usually carries a big fat title involving celebrities, sex and violence – if possible, all three of them together – but occasionally, politics or religion will do as well. Apparently, on 3 February, Dagbladet’s best shot at getting as many copies as possible sold was to put the cartoon, which already caused a stir in the nineties of the previous century, on is front page.

Whether or not the 3 February edition of Dagbladet sold particularly well remains unclear, but it sure got plenty of attention. Attention is seldom… Read More.

Norwegian Muslims warn of impending 9-11

Posted on by

Much more information is available here but in Norwegian. I am waiting on a translation but it would appear that due to the publication of a cartoon that Muslims didn’t like, massive but so far peaceful, demonstrations are taking place in Norway with veiled threats of a “9-11” style attack as a result of the publication. Yes we all have to make sure we do not upset the Muslims even if it means submitting quietly to the most violent, repugnant,  sexist and racist irrational religious authority perhaps that the world has ever seen. Certainly the one that has done the most harm by orders of magnitude.

UPDATE:

Turks take down Dagbladet servers with DDOS attack.