Category Archives: Selective enforcement

Quiet Evening Meeting about Refugee Center in Luttelgeest

Posted on by

An original translation by SIMONXML with much thanks.

[This is for the silencing of public dissent file and government cover up files -Ed]

From this Dutch language news site:

Thursday, 21:37 Jan. 28 2016

Photo: The area around Luttelgeest where the emergency ordinance applied

In the area around Luttelgeest in Flevoland, The Netherlands, an emergency ordinance was effected last night for an information meeting about the possible arrival of a second refugee center. The regulation applied to an area within a radius of five kilometers around the village and lasted until midnight. As far as is known, the evening passed quietly.

Because of the emergency ordinance, journalists from the local news agency (Omroep Flevoland) were removed from the area. They wanted to report on the meeting held at the Orchideeënhoeve but were turned away by police. Only people who have been invited to the meeting were allowed into the area.

Police advice

Mayor Van der Werff pointed out that information sessions in other municipalities had gotten out of hand, “especially because the residents who had been invited were approached by the press and were therefore unable to attend the information evening undisturbed and anonymously.” Van der Werff said that based on a police recommendation he had to assume there would be “serious disorders”.

The municipality of Noordoostpolder, which includes Luttelgeest under, has plans for a temporary reception center that would have capacity of 450 refugees. There has been a refugee center in Luttelgeest since 1987 with a capacity for 1400 people. Luttelgeest itself has 2100 inhabitants.

Letter

Reporter Ingrid Kupers from Omroep Flevoland said yesterday that local residents had been informed by letter about the meeting. In it, there were asked not to say anything in public about the meeting. When she went to the meeting location with a cameraman, the police instructed her to leave.

The editor of Omroep Flevoland intends to press charges.

The Vrij Nederland MP, Louis Bontes, spoke of “severe restrictions” on the freedom of the press and demanded to know what the Dutch government was going to do to prevent this happening again.

On Wednesday, the Dutch Society of Chief Editors appealed against the decision of a number of municipalities to keep the press away from information sessions about asylum centers. The immediate reason was the recent events in Heesch in Brabant, where only one local journalist was allowed in.

The Bias of Facebook and social Media

Posted on by

A few days ago, I posted a sort of ‘after-burner’ at the end of one of my posts about a test of anti-Israel bias and even antisemitism on FB and mentioned the video had been removed from YT.

There was some confusion. Many people posted the video we all, including me, assumed it was.

This is the story to which I was referring. Please download it again in case YT decides to also remove this evidence.

The Netherlands. Enrichment and reaction

Posted on by

This email just came in:

The situation in the Netherlands is becoming severe since New Year Eve. Demonstrations against asylum seekers centres are becoming more violent and the so called “refugees” show gradually their real face …and the hazard they had brought with them

Demonstration against ‘refugee’ center and police action to end it

Adult student attacks teacher in Dutch school

The video below is described as, ‘Muslims bully the Dutch over Christmas holidays’ but it appears to be a sort of compilation propaganda video with various events stitched together from last summer across Europe while the Dutch PM drones on about helping the migrants. At one point it does cut to The Netherlands though about a peculiar ind of alleged attack on an upstairs apt. of a low rise where it is claimed that the downstairs muslim migrants are piping some kind of noxious gas into the upstairs flat, presumably with the intention of evicting the upstairs indigenous Dutch. As the attack substantially increased at Christmas, it doesn’t seem impossible. Perhaps someone is familiar with IS or Muslim Brotherhood literature on how this kind of attack might be done. The smell was mothballs. 

 

Thank you Nicolai Sennels and Ron.

Post Script:

There is an ongoing situation in one part of the Netherlands where the locals are hanging multiple pig heads at a certain location and claiming it is part of an old and honoured Dutch tradition to do so. Of course the police are more interested in level 1 sharia compliancy so there is ongoing conflict over that.

Daily Mail succumbs to sanitizing the Islam out of terror stories?

Posted on by

Yesterday we posted one of many Daily Mail stories, this one about a man who was stopped on a train because he had an umbrella that had a handle that looked like a Samurai sword.

The article is here and the main photo from the article is below:

An astute reader of this website, KrayThaTruth, had read the story when it was first published and made a comment about the photo, which he screen grabbed. His comment   was not published. But he noticed that when he went back to the story later, they had zoomed in on the photo to crop out the top.

To see the photo as it was before it was changed, click the read more tab please.

Continue Reading →

US based on freedom of speech. Unless you criticize the dogma that drives jihad. Then you will be prosecuted.

Posted on by

(And remember to report anything suspicious. Unless its islamic terror related. Then say nothing or get sued and humiliated)

Loretta Lynch Vows to Prosecute Those Who Use ‘Anti-Muslim’ Speech That ‘Edges Toward Violence’

The day after a horrific shooting spree by a “radicalized” Muslim man and his partner in San Bernardino, California, Attorney General Loretta Lynch pledged to a group of Muslim activists that she would take aggressive action against anyone who used “anti-Muslim rhetoric” that “edges toward violence.”

Speaking to the audience at the Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary dinner Thursday, Lynch said her “greatest fear” is the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric” in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech. She said:

The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence. My message to not just the Muslim community but to the entire American community is: we cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on.

Assuring the pro-Muslim group that “we stand with you,” Lynch said she would use her Justice Department to protect Muslims from “violence” and discrimination.

Claiming that violence against Muslims is on the rise and citing France’s clamp down on potentially radicalized mosques, Lynch suggested the Constitution does not protect “actions predicated on violent talk” and pledged to prosecute those responsible for such actions.

“When we talk about the First Amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American,” said Lynch. “They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.”

“My message not just to the Muslim community but to all Americans is ‘We cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on,'” said Lynch.

It is painfully clear that, like her predecessor Eric Holder, Lynch is far more concerned with promoting the social justice agenda than protecting the Constitutional rights of American citizens. What exactly is speech that “edges toward violence”? What exactly are “actions predicated on violent talk”? In the end, it is whatever she decides it to mean.

Loretta Lynch, at a press conference yesterday, termed the San Bernardino shootings a “wonderful opportunity” to change the nature of police work:

We’re at the point where these issues have come together really like never before in law enforcement thought and in our nation’s history and it gives us a wonderful opportunity and a wonderful moment to really make significant change.

H/T M.

Declaration of Geert Wilders before the Court sitting in Chambers, Tribunal The Hague, November 25, 2015 at 3:00 pm

Posted on by

Mr. President, members of the Chamber,

I have the right to a fair trial. That is why I am here.
Not to ask you a favor. But to ask you what I am entitled to.
A fair trial. And the right to defend myself in the best possible way.
If you do not give me that chance then this trial will be a farce.

During the first meeting the investigative judge told to me, “You should have a fair chance, the law will be interpreted broadly.” But the opposite has happened. All my 39 requests, all the requests from the defendant have been rejected.
Apparently, I am not allowed an adequate defense.

The investigative judge is uncritically following the Public Prosecutor. The Chamber agreed with the Public Prosecutor to reject the first twelve requests. Hopefully, that will not be the case for the 27 rejections that you must decide on now. Because if all reasonable requests are rejected, then I cannot defend myself, and I apparently have to be sentenced at all costs.

I am taken to court for what I have said.
But I have said nothing wrong.
Fewer Moroccans, fewer Syrians, fewer Mexicans, fewer Russians, I do not see why stating that is punishable. However, when Turkish members of the Dutch parliament call me a tumor that must be fought and when they compare me to Hitler, then there is no consternation, no massive complaints on pre-printed forms, no prime minister who speaks shame of it and no Public Prosecutor to come into action.
What kind of country are we living in?!

I speak for millions of Dutch. And I will continue to do so.
That is my duty as a representative of the people.
And that is my right. It is a travesty that I have to stand here before you today.

I have done nothing wrong.
At least, I want to be allowed to defend myself in court.
I want to hear witnesses and experts so that I can defend myself.

The investigative judge promised me a fair chance, but he did not give me such a chance.
I now turn to you: Give me the chance to defend myself.
Give me the chance to a fair trial.

 

French govt. fines group 216.00 € Each for protesting racist train fares for UMIs

Posted on by

Oz-Rita sent in a translation from a press release by the new French Resistance who call themselves, Generation Identitaire.

Official press release of Generation Identitaire

Illegal invaders (euphemistically referred to as “refugees” can now travel free on French trains. The young French patriots, Generation Identitaire, protested against this, peacefully, via banner (see photo below) on the roof of the Cannes railway station. Each one of them received a penalty of 216 Euros, i.e. 2,160 euros. No “tolerance” for French patriots.

SNCF (National Railways of France) are accomplices in the immigrant invasion.

A couple of complimentary examples of media manipulation for leftist effect

Posted on by

This first one is from the new station, Czech Independent News and busts Polish TV doing what Canada’s CBC does daily, especially when it comes to any pro-life marches at Parliament hill. If they report on them at all, they reduce the numbers in attendance often by nine tenths or more.

Below, a TIME reporter claims the number in attendance at a ‘Slut Walk’ is higher than actual by something like 5000%

This goes some way to explaining the gap between male and female representation in STEM subjects: a feminist TIME journalist has claimed that “15,000” people attended a Slut Walk for which, by most estimations, barely 300 showed up.

In an op-ed for the magazine’s website that has since been altered to read “thousands,” which is still inaccurate, journalist Erica Williams Simon heavily implied she was present at the event, writing, “The solidarity was palpable and the energy electric.”

And a bonus example from Australia

The public lynching of a critical voice by Liberty DK

Posted on by

Sweden’s public “media” today

The Stasi-like ugly face of Swedish politically correct media showed itself today in full bloom with the public lynching of a well-known and respected journalist, Julia Caesar (pseudonym).

A Swedish journalist, Julia Caesar, an elderly pensioner of frail health, has in recent years written about a hundred articles critical of the state of Sweden and its slide into chaos. She is, in this writer’s view, one of the most honest, insightful and clear-headed journalists today. Her essays about Swedish politics, political correctness and Sweden’s’ insane out-of-control immigration policy have earned her a loyal readership. She has been, and remains, a very important voice of dissent in the politically correct deranged country of Sweden and her articles are read by the hundreds of thousands. She writes under a pseudonym because, as she explains in the article to follow, her life, and her family’s life would be in danger were she to publish under her real name.

In the following article, published this past Saturday in the Danish website Snaphanen, Julia Caesar wrote the an account of the unscrupulous depths Swedish media will go to in order to silence dissent. It is truly frightening.

“There are people who have taken upon themselves the right to utterly shatter my safe haven and make my life a living hell. I am hunted by people, emissaries of a large media group who want to silence me. They want to stop me writing by harassing and molesting me, scaring me and by making my life as unbearable as possible.”

In relation to this story, the on-line publication Avpixlat writes the following under the headline “Swedish media now a parody of itself”:

Source: http://avpixlat.info/2015/09/02/svensk-media-nu-en-parodi-pa-sig-sjalv/

“In Sweden, we have other kinds of punishment than death sentences for the “wrong” views. Precisely as said by the economist Tino Sanandaji on American television, this instead takes place in the form of social stigmatization and branding – thus expressing critical views about Europe and the world’s most extreme and destructive immigration policy – backed by a small and utterly reality-resistant bubble in Stockholm’s inner city, and that has never taken its journalistic mission seriously – becomes an absolute necessity.”

Update: This article was, just today the 2nd of September, countered by an article written by Annika Hamrud, one of the journalists who had stalked Julia. Hamrud’s contempt for Julia shines through in her article where she publishes both the name and the photo of the woman behind the pseudonym, thereby willfully and deliberately putting Julia’s life in danger. http://www.expressen.se/kultur/hon-ar-julia-caesar/

[Editor: The rest of this 3 part piece will be below the fold. Thank you Liberty DK. and Gates of Vienna for the tireless effort to write, translate and edit all this important information. Remember, Europe is tomorrow’s newspaper for Canada and the late afternoon edition it seems, for the United States.

Continue Reading →

Influential muslim intimates veiled threats to Quebec if they do not pass Bill 59

Posted on by

As readers of this site will know, there has been a debate all week in the Quebec legislature about potential passage of a bill called, Bill 59.

There is so much wrong with it one doesn’t know where to begin. But begin we must for its the first flush of the principles of the enlightenment and Western Civilization and it will spread from Quebec across the Western world as people, most notably leftist and muslim groups, see this as a model of how to implement phase 1 of sharia blasphemy laws.

The clip below is a couple of short segments of a very influential muslim, Imam Salam Elmenyawi. in Montreal, who I am reliably informed is head of an organization what represents 70 islamic institutions including being the chaplain of McGill and Concordia University.

While an astute observer would be able to find quite a few flaws in this man’s ‘reasoning’ the one that concerns this website the most is the fact of selective enforcement. We can say with certainty that bill 59 will never be used to stop a muslim preacher from explaining to his congregation how all non-muslims are inferior and unworthy of the most basic of human dignities let alone rights, and that Jews are somehow apes and pigs etc. These notions, which compose a significant majority of the koran and hadiths, will be considered protected speech under their religious rights, while any attempt to point this out will be prosecuted under Bill 59.

How can I know this? The website Point De Bascule already attempted to take a hate preacher to task under already existing hate crimes laws and the case was refused. And that was in 2008. This new tool will only sharpen the distinction and make the fines for criticism of islam that much easier to prosecute and the fines that much more painful.

In these two clips of his testimony, the totality of which can be seen here, we can see everything from careful wording to guarantee that ridicule of non-islamic world views will be perfectly OK, while islam will be uniquely protected, to what sure sounds like a threat at the end of the second clip.

Thank you Sassy for translating these and sending them our way.

The Changing Rules of Politically Correct Poker

Posted on by

Not so much that the rules change perhaps, as what constitutes a winning hand. Basically the strong call the wild cards.

First, the video:

Now this article from Nicolai Sennels:

And then this article from Blazing Cat Fur. Don’t skip the comments.

The full video is here.

Thank you Nicolai and Liberty Dk.