How Marxism weaponized homosexuality, artists, and a fresh look at Gramsci and the Long March

This is the 4th clip of the Polish intellectual Ava Lon has done for us, as part of a series from this video. The man who made it, is well known in Poland for explaining the nature of leftism and Marxism. The First three clips can be found on our D Tube channel, as well as here.

Direct link

Third clip from the same video

Second clip from the same video

First clip from the same video

(Will add other clips as they are found. The original entire clip in Polish can be seen here below)

 

Prager U misses the key piece on leftist-Tolerance

Prager videos are excellent. And there is nothing wrong with what Dave Ruben says. But there is something missing that makes all the difference in one’s understanding.

Dave Ruben’s video is an accurate observation of the left’s version of tolerance, and is cathartic for the rest of us in a thin way, as it confirms our own observations. But unless you understand why we all see what we see it is of limited use.

I draw your attention to page 71 of Rich Higgins and Stephen Coughlin’s paper on the Strategy and Tactics of the Left. An examination of the various Marxist tacticians and strategists, and the legacy of destruction they created.

While Marcuse was a prolific writer, treatment here will be limited to establish- ing the dialectical nature of Marcuse’s “Repressive Tolerance” in furtherance of explaining its dialectical design.

 

“Repressive Tolerance” weaponized critical theory for use against America and the West. For Marcuse, the repressive tolerance of America was, and still is, in need of negation by a liberating toler- ance—Die Amerikanische Kultur muss aufgehoben werden.

 

As with Horkheimer and Lukács, Marcuse’s Marxism was purposefully Hegelian. While still in Germany, Marcuse studied under Martin Heidegger.179 In 1932 he wrote a Ph.D. level thesis, Hegel‘s Ontologie und die Grundlegung einer Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit (Hegel’s Ontology and the Theory of Historicity).180In 1941, while on staff at the Institute for Social Research at Columbia University, he famously wrote Reason and Revolution.181 The full name of the monograph is Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Modern Social Theory.182 In 1965, he wrote “Repressive Tolerance”.183

 

“Repressive Tolerance” lays out the operational design of Marxist critical theory applied to America. Marcuse did this through the arbitrary division of tolerance into two forms; liberating and repressive, for the purpose of subjecting toler- ance to a dialectical process of negation. Under Marcuse’s regime, (universal) tolerance becomes intolerance to non-conforming (particular) views.

Leftists have, as they consistently do in their war against reason, redefined important terms accepted by us all as having specific meanings, in order to weaponize them to the purpose of the destruction of Western culture, laws and civilization. Tolerance, to leftists, and especially those steeped in leftist thought like ANTIFA, means Marcuse’s Repressive Tolerance, which as stated above, is a critical theory tactical weapon to crush all who stand in the way of ascendent Marxist thought as the dominant and only form of thought.

UPDATE:

Thank you PC for sending in this video explanation of repressive tolerance.

(This video above fails to understand the Hegelian type of thinking which is the core of Marxism. His explanation is good in terms of the practical understanding of its result, but to really understand repressive tolerance you have to understand the Hegelian-Marxist strategy of dialectic negation of our culture(s) )

A paragraph from Stephen & Rich’s Re-Remembering The Misremembered Left

Political Warfare recognizes the role narratives play in overwhelming a rule of law society. This includes the formation of mass line movements and counter-state activities that utilize narratives at the cultural level, with the objective of powering down into the political space, where fidelity to the narrative will result in non-enforcement of law that, over time, will become institutionalized.

 

It is through the process of imposing narratives that the opposition first becomes influenced and then controlled; becoming a controlled opposition. Abuse of language leads to an abuse of power. Political warfare strategies are intensely dialectical, seeking the isolation of American values that are then negated through a relentless process of dialectical negation—Aufheben der Kultur.

Above is a paragraph from Stephen Coughlin’s document, The Left’s Strategies and Tactics. It is a document I post at link to at every chance.

Reading near the end, this paragraph caught my attention as something that needs to go up right away, as it explains so many accelerating events we see around us now daily. The ANTIFA Storm Troops battling old ladies in walkers trying to go and see Maxime Bernier speak in Hamilton for example.

This may be the woman who was mobbed by ANTIFA thugs of the elderly in Hamilton this weekend

https://twitter.com/DTurkoski/status/1179070953680244738

Explaining Frankfurt School’s Marcuse’s idea on the minority dominating the majority via ‘tolerance’

Thank you Ava Lon. This, like the previous one you did, must have been hell to do, as the thinking of Marxists is so twisted.

Direct link:

https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmSojBXPV414w7RQmS5Kbw4dAPoQoXyNnRn2qJuhY23DvM

Killing Canada back online!

If anyone has not seen this yet and wants to get an indication of who is working to remove freedoms and democracy from Canada, how and why, you can get at least an intro here.

Some of the people mentioned in this video have since formed an organization together which is essentially a SPLC type thing, calling itself an “Anti-Hate” group and consists of at least two of the people discussed in this video and a couple of others who are not.

More on that later.

Terrorism fuels leftist apologists in Toronto

I have tried to watch this clip maybe 5 times and failed every time because the strident dishonesty and failure of logic of the hysterical and hate filled women who interrupted an interview by David Menzies of the Rebel, made it so that I simply couldn’t get past the one minute mark. This time, I stepped away from the laptop and listened from where I couldn’t hit pause.

I can see why it has over 100,000 views. This women is a tight package of nearly all of the tactics of the contemporary left. The fuse premise stokes anger, breeds sanctimony which fuels strident self righteousness, and then justifies actual kinetic behaviour. Im pretty sure if she thought she could be effective it at, she would turn violent.

Its a tough watch because its such a good example of a failure of humanity in some ways. But watch it we will. Much like rubber necking at a civilizational car accident.

 

News from Airstrip One. Trans-prisoners

Sorry all, that I was late with the Reader’s Links post for today. Its up now. Look below.

Cologne: Antifa Announce They Will Harass Cops On New Year’s Eve

Cologne – “Cologne Against Right – Antifascist Action Committee” announce that on New Year’s Eve night, they will monitor the police, to prevent  “racial profiling” by the police.

New Year’s Eve In Cologne: RACIAL PROFILING IS ILLEGAL – CITIZEN*NESSES WATCH THE POLICE. Source: Köln Gegen Rechts/Antifaschistisches Aktionsbündnis

The group criticize that, in order to prevent the mass taharrush of New Year’s Eve 2015 from being repeated, 2016 police had stopped thousands of male, young Nafris from entering the square between Cathedral and train station:

“Thousands of visitors to downtown were singled out because of the color of their skin, their assumed nationality, and their religious beliefs. They were apprehended and presented to the public as a catch in the glistening floodlights of the Main Train Station Square.”

To fully appreciate the bigotry of Antifa there, it is crucial to understand that ethnically, a “Nafri” (police abbreviation for a specific group of young, criminal, Northern African illegal migrants) is mediterranean. Just like Southern Italians are, too, many of whom live in Germany, and are never singled out by the police. It is the behavior – aggressiveness, drunkenness, and showing up in large, male-only, groups of young men – and not the color of their skin that “singles” (groups?) Nafris out to the police.

The Antifa state that they, too, were all for security:

“Security to a long and healthy life, a secure income, a secure job, safety from pollution and destruction of the environment, security for our citizens’ rights, the security that police and intelligence services play by the rules, and, last but not least, the security to be protected from racial and gender-specific discrimination.”

Not once does their long-winded statement mention the security of women.

So, for New Year’s Eve 2017, they announce that they will be observing and recording the police.

They call upon citize*nnesses¹ to do the same, and to tweet and post on December 31 to ge*********@****up.net and Köln gegen Rechts – Antifaschistisches Aktionsbündnis (FB) under the hashtag  #copwatchcgn

Despite Köln gegen Rechts’ apparent deletion of critical comments, a few have made it through. One commenter asks:

“Why don’t you watch the women instead? Then the officers could stay home and celebrate with their families.”

¹ Bürger*Innen, politically correct, gender-inclusive Newspeak German for Bürger, “citizen”

Cologne, New Year’s Eve 2016/17: Police stop large groups of young men.

The corrosive (by design) effects of leftism on Western institutions

1. Leftist deliberate and forced irrationality eventually has to come sort of full circle, albeit an eccentric one.

2. For those that have not seen it yet, muslims in France demand 2500 more mosques or else they will continue to block traffic and hand out pamphlets demanding genocide of the Jewish peoples.

(I repost these because the view numbers at Youtube are far far lower than they deserve, or would typically get. One might even suspect that Youtube is fudging things so that it doesn’t resonate the way it really should and we all expect really would.)

3. UC Berkeley conservative student sues Antifa member over threats, harassment

The former president of the Berkeley College Republicans at the University of California, Berkeley said Wednesday he is suing a prominent member of an Antifa group for allegedly threatening and harassing him and others on campus.

Mark Meuser, one of the lawyers representing Troy Worden, announced the lawsuit seeking more than $100,000 of damages against Yvette Felarca in a press release, The Washington Examiner reported.

 

Felarca is the leader of By Any Means Necessary (BAMN), an Antifa, or anti-fascist, group.

 

(If the video embed above doesn’t work, click through to FOX to see the clip. Its about a few conservative students at Berkeley who have seen the total loss of their 1st amendment rights due to violent fascistic commies.)

4. This analysis of the Teacher’s assistant at Wilfred Laurier who faced a Soviet style of reasoning, Star Chamber over showing a Jordan Peterson video, is excellent. It is hard to find the time to listen to the entire 40 some minutes of the hidden recording of the inquisition. But Sargon organizes and analyses the event very well here.

One thing to keep in mind during this video, is the difference between Critical Theory, and critical thinking. One of the main differences between the TA and the inquisitors, is that they are insisting things be looked at in terms of Critical Theory, a Frankfurt School idea where you simply take opposing ideas and attack them in every way, without reason or data. Just criticism, even of a personal nature of the people espousing ideas.

But she is using critically, in terms of critical thinking, or the application of Socratic thought.

Thats all for the moment. As always, a grateful thank you to all who sent in materials, and a very happy thanksgiving to all our American friends. It is truly heartwarming to see how profoundly Americans overall celebrate this tradition.

 

 

Interview with Michael Stürzenberger on his 6 month jail sentence for posting historical fact