Trump Derangement Syndrome, is really a variant of NDS Omicron at least, if not Pi or Rho

Those of us not actually infected with Trump Derangement syndrome and are old enough to clearly remember Bush, may remember that the media treated Bush the same way as they treat Trump, even if not quite as harshly. That is actually where the term was coined. “Bush Derangement Syndrome” was the first iteration of it, at least in memory. But for those even older, we may remember when the media showed constant hydrophobic rage at Nixon. If you wanted to have any degree of ‘cool’ at all, you had to really hate or mock Nixon. Then the 2IC of the FBI took him down by using a couple of ignorant and arguably scruple-less dupes at a major US Newspaper as couriers and beards. Career advancement by carrying documents from “Deepthroat”, a disgruntled FBI executive, to the editors at, all too predictably, The Washington Post with instructions to print without altering anything. Tough gig right? But great way to get a Pulitzer.

Suddenly what Lara Logan said about the prize falls into sharper relief.

One summer, there wasn’t much bad news to pin on GW Bush. So a mildly neurotic woman decided to camp out at the end of Bush’s driveway I think somewhere in Texas for the summer to protest the death of her son in the Iraq war. If memory serves, her name was Cindy Sheehan. And the media lapped this up and published regularly on Sheehan’s camping trip. Her family basically divorced her over it, again if memory serves. She was ventriloquizing her dead son as a weapon against Bush.

Her antics earned her a line in the brief internet hit song, Bush was Right:

One day during the presidency of GW Bush, I was having lunch with some old friends and some people I had never met before. One of them, a doctor at a Canadian forces base spoke out during the meal: “Well everyone hates Bush!”. I answered that actually I didn’t hate Bush. I didn’t say I liked him, just said I didn’t hate him. The response was a visceral and angry, “OH C’MON! YES YOU DO!” An instructive moment. Even back then you hate to hate who you had to hate or be excluded from polite company.

Going backwards to a previous Republican president who actually was the most popular ever up to that point, an entire Frankfurt School Critical Theory industry was spawned. A ‘journalist’ famous for constant and massive doses of mind altering drugs, ones that make you hallucinate things that aren’t there and not see things that are, became the vanguard of critical theory attacks on Nixon. His writing was very entertaining though, and Rolling Stone ended up having to print everything he wrote without editing. That did well for Rolling Stone. And one must add, his books are a really enjoyable read. From Hell’s Angels to Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, his material are page turners. But not something upon which one may want to make serious decisions for oneself. Hunter S. Thompson wrote in a way that defied and even showed contempt for all the rules of journalism. But he did it very entertainingly, and even endearingly. When he wrote Hells Angels and told a story in it about how at a party people got extremely high and started firing guns out the window to show how extreme this motorcycle gang was, only to find as you read onwards that in fact it was Thompson himself who did that. Cute. Funny. But not journalism. Great writing, but the story was about him and his behaviour.

In the clip below, Nixon describes what he calls the “Media Elitist Complex”. That is brilliantly succinct. This site has called it the Government media complex since we started it. But Nixon’s name for the threat shows a great deal of insight. It also shows he was a man of the people. Like Trump. So no wonder they had to destroy him.

Fact Checking Reuters’ fact checking

Thanks to our own X

Reuters fact check from may 2023:

No evidence migration caused exaggerated 2013 Swedish rape statistics

Exaggerated rape statistics for Sweden in 2013 that have been used to suggest that migrants have driven an increase in assaults are false. Although Swedish crime data show an increase in such offences between 1990 and 2011, there is no evidence migration was a cause, an expert said.

One Facebook user (here) uploaded a screenshot of a Jan. 2013 webpage (archived: here) with the headline: “1 in 4 Swedish women will be raped as sexual assaults increase 500%”.

The image includes a graph showing an increase in the incidence of rape between 1990 and 2011, as well as the text: “Sweden has imported huge numbers of Muslim immigrants with catastrophic effect.”

Similar posts can be seen on Facebook (here), (here) and Twitter (here), where one user claims: “Mass migration from the Third World has resulted in this.”

However, the one in four risk figure is vastly overstated based on Swedish crime data for 2013, and the “500%” increase in reported assaults over a 21-year period is at least partly explained by a “drastic” widening of the definition of rape under Swedish law during this period, a crime expert said.

In addition, Swedish crime data published in 2021 show no evidence of increased sexual assaults led by immigrants or the children of immigrant parents.

Reality. A scientific paper on the subject: National Library of Medicine

Sweden has witnessed an increase in the rates of sexual crimes including rape. Knowledge of who the offenders of these crimes are is therefore of importance for prevention. We aimed to study characteristics of individuals convicted of rape, aggravated rape, attempted rape or attempted aggravated rape (abbreviated rape+), against a woman ?18?years of age, in Sweden. By using information from the Swedish Crime Register, offenders between 15 and 60?years old convicted of rape+ between 2000 and 2015 were included. Information on substance use disorders, previous criminality and psychiatric disorders were retrieved from Swedish population-based registers, and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to identify classes of rape+?offenders. A total of 3 039 offenders were included in the analysis. A majority of them were immigrants (n?=?1 800; 59.2%) of which a majority (n?=?1 451; 47.7%) were born outside of Sweden. The LCA identified two classes: Class A — low offending class (LOC), and Class B — high offending class (HOC). While offenders in the LOC had low rates of previous criminality, psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders, those included in the HOC had high rates of previous criminality, psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders. While HOC may be composed by more “traditional” criminals probably known by the police, the LOC may represent individuals not previously known by the police. These two separated classes, as well as our finding in regard to a majority of the offenders being immigrants, warrants further studies that take into account the contextual characteristics among these offenders.

Key points

  • Rape, aggravated rape, attempted rape or attempted aggravated rape (rape+) are increasing in Sweden.
  • The majority of those convicted of rape+ are immigrants.
  • LCA identifies two classes of rape+ offenders: LOC and HOC.

Number of reported cases of sexual offences in Sweden from 2012 to 2022, by type

The graph is interactive at the source. Please click through and check it out at the link above.

Sweden – The number of rapes completely exploded in 2023.
“84% committed by Muslim migrants”

Geert Wilders victory and let’s play Media Bullsh*t Bingo

PJ Watson on the electoral victory of Geert Wilders

Here is a link to a BBC assassination piece on Wilders. Perhaps we should adopt the Global Warming rhetorical scam-spotting game, Bullsh*t Bingo and adapt it to dialectical tactics by the MSM.

On your card you could have:

Insulting insinuations not used for leftist candidates. An example would be a critique of Wilders’ hair style but never attacking any leftist candidate for hair plugs or dye or any other form of quaff.

“Controversial”. One of my personal favorite dialectical/rhetorical weapons of the MSM. CBC uses it sprinkled on eggs every morning for breakfast. A politician is controversial if he is counter-revolutionary. If that politician or person is a communist revolutionary that word is not used. A general example would be a Prof. of Biology with Ph.D.s in the field, who says that a man cannot simply become a woman by saying so, is controversial. While a man claiming to be a woman on one day to take all the top spots in women’s sports and then going back to being a man afterwards is not controversial. Because of the stance that J.K. Rowling has taken on this, she is now considered a far right wing, and highly controversial figure. A Canadian nurse was investigated in fact, for involvement with a billboard saying I (heart) JK ROWLING.

(Her ordeal is still ongoing as of November 9th this year)

The article continues in more subtle ways to disparage Wilders. They discuss his arrest for a thought crime and that communist UK refused to allow him into the country, even though Wilders at that time was an MPs in the European Union and the UK was still inside the EU. This shows the real nature of the beast. The European Union is a revolutionary organization like the UN. Although their rules stipulate that one country must grant access to members of parliament from other EU states, the truth was that this only applies to agents of the revolution. This site emphasizes the single metric by which all things work today. And that is communist-revolution Vs. counter-revolution. The evidence for this is as common as gravel and salt on the roads in the winter in Canada. All processes work this way. When a court or hearing or ‘Human Rights Tribunal” adjudicates on the actual evidence, rule of law, and real human rights, meaning individual ones and not arbitrarily defined collective ones, it’s the exception.

In the case of Wilders, think of it this way. Leftist activists invent all kinds of bogus organization to create awards to give to left wing activists in order to add gravitas to their agenda. There is one dialectical-Jewish man (He uses his ethnicity as a sword and a shield to advance leftist objectives, hence ‘dialectic Jew) who heads a dialectical communist organization much like the SPLC in the US, in Canada  who even speaks at events sponsored by CAIR-Canada (now NCCM) to combat ‘islamophobia ‘who’s talks are prefaced with all kinds of awards. We see this often with the left. It is a way of getting people to listen, and giving authority to people who have accomplished nothing but are advancing the communist agenda. With Wilders, they invent charges and events which are not legal or proper procedure which they know will fail under scrutiny of any court not yet fully revolutionary. But that doesn’t matter. What does, is that they can talk about the accusation. So kind of the inverse of the awards scam. For leftists, invent fake awards to give gravitas, for counter-revolutionaries, invent charges and prohibitions to destroy their public image. Alinsky Rule 13.

Wilders was convicted of inciting discrimination, although later acquitted, and he was refused entry to the UK back in 2009.

Accused. They took him to court over asking his constituency a question of immigration policy. The actual job of government. They accused and tried him twice of a thought/speech crime because the question he asked, “Do you want more Moroccan immigration (to the Netherlands) or less”? was a counter-revolutionary one. See in a contemporary democracy you have total freedom of speech so long as its all in perfect accordance with the communist nation-destroying, individual-crushing agenda. Wilders dared ask the people of the Netherlands what they want for the future of the Netherlands and was tried twice and acquitted for it. But the BBC uses that accusation as a cudgel. Same as his rejection from the UK, which is actually a breach of rules, if not illegal, of the UK not Wilders. The BBC are dialectical engineers.

For those interested, here is Geert’s closing statement at one of the struggle sessions trials he was put through over this matter:

 

But Europe’s far right believes their views have now become more mainstream.

This one above we all know. It’s called, Moving the Goal Posts. What was once the absolute obvious reasonable goals of any nation state, to protect itself, to protect its citizens, to have equality before law for all etc. etc. is now “far right wing”. There is a double irony here. The left, in what is probably the greatest con of the 20th century, have convinced people that the Nazis are some how right wing. The National Socialist Worker’s Party under Hitler, far right wing by some act of alchemy. The party who”s leader’s speeches, notably at Nuremberg, quoted Marx chapter and Verse, who hated the Russians because he didn’t think they could pull off socialism while the Germans could, those guys were right wing. All powerful state and the crushing of individual rights is in no way right wing. That is Hegelian/Marxist communism. Libertarian, maximal individual rights with minimal state power, is the true right wing. And there is the double, and maybe even triple irony. It means that Wilders, Orban, Trump, The new Argentinian guy, possibly Poilievre in Canada and other people the media call “far right wing” are in reality somewhat right wing, but in the opposite way of the impression they are trying to create. Frankly, by libertarian standards, all these leaders are still more collectivist and big government than is desirable. So in fact they are just more right wing in the good way than the revolutionary communists now running the Western world and its media and institutions. Hence the triple irony.

With a little more effort we could flesh out all the score card points for Bullsh*t bingo of leftist dialectical journalism. Probably all of it from that one BBC article, although I’m sure there are other devices they may have neglected to use in that one article. Feel free to leave ones you may have noticed in the comments.

 

Examining media tactics to deconstruct classical thought and civilizational cornerstones: Links 1 for September 22nd, 2023

1. This is an excellent example of one of the media cons used to destroy our civilization right down to the conceptual level. I used to think of it as ‘sleight of hand with levels of abstraction’. In other words, false equivalence. In this example they claim that Hungary is being hypocritical because they are presented as anti-immigration but are dependant on immigrants for certain kinds of labour and treat them quite well.
This is conflating invasion with immigration. In pre-revolutionary times, all nations were anti-invasion and all where fine with vetted, predetermined immigration to get people with skills that enhance the nation and are not a drain or increase in crime, as well as fit in culturally. The media conflates invasion with immigration creating the illusion of hypocrisy. If you do not allow your nation to be literally negated by mass immigration, crushing your culture, economy and so on, you are anti-immigrant. The same tactics the left uses to force a narrative on most issues. Like saying you don’t want a public school to talk your young son to have his penis and testicles cut off means you are a fascist and against trans-rights. Whatever that is.

By way of analogy, one could make the same case about Hungary’s family planning policies. Euronews could say, ‘Hungary paid families to have children by offering reduced taxation and other incentives by lessened government pressures while ironically keeping rapists in jail”. Or, ‘Hungary’s department stores are having a sale to encourage shoppers while ironically putting thieves in jail.’  The false equivalence works this way. A rapist and a couple making love both are having sex. A thief and a customer are both removing goods from a shop. A little jump-shift in level of abstraction to make an equivalence while also removing the major component of volunteerism. A slave is the same as a farm hand because they both pick cotton. Be wary when watching dialectical news. They lie right to your face while fully equanimous but for those who remember the age of reason, a moment’s thought and it becomes clear. This is a good reason to cut off all live TV and only see ‘news’ as clips on YouTube where you can pause it when they insert a dialectic of one kind or another. This way you can pause and think before moving on with the clip. It would be interesting to see what percent of people who did or did not take the vaxx watch TV. One might suspect that those who did not watch TV took the vaxx far less than those who do. As even the left admitted during the first major push for mandates of one kind or another, those of us who were against masks and vaxx had more and better information than the pushers did, hence they suggested other more Critical theory means to get people to obey. So less TV means more information if this hypothesis is correct. (Cannot find that set of news items from a couple of years ago. I hope you all remember that amazing little story)

2. Jamie Sarkonak: Public must pay for gender-affirmation surgeries abroad, says Ontario review board

If there are guardrails on Ontario’s coverage for niche genital surgeries, they are very low

When a public health authority is asked to subsidize a novel, understudied medical procedure, it can say “no.” If it says “yes,” it better have good reasons, because the rest of us have to pay for it. Those being made to pay for unproven treatments have the right to question why exactly they’re being forced to pony up the cash.

Those questions are now justifiably being asked by Ontarians about publicly funded sex-change operations. The Health Services Appeal and Review Board’s (HSARB) recent ruling on what procedures must be covered by the public has opened the door to funding just about any novel surgery — even those that are so niche, no surgeon in Canada can (or will) perform them.

Advancing the case was a 33-year-old non-binary male patient, known as KS, who identified as “female dominant.” KS came to the review board after having been denied public coverage for a “penile preserving vaginoplasty” (a surgery that adds an opening to serve as female genitalia, without removing the penis), which isn’t listed on the slate of sex-reassignment procedures covered by the province.

In fact, this procedure isn’t offered by any doctor in Canada — the standard vaginoplasty here involves the “penile inversion” technique. The “penile preserving” technique must be performed abroad; KS asked to be sent to a specific clinic in Austin, Texas (the clinic told me, over the phone, that gender-affirming genital surgeries can range from US$10,000-US$70,000 (C$13,500-C$94,000), depending on what exactly is being done).

3. PJ Watson on Russel brand. No, this is in fact much more than gossip. This is examining a weapon against anyone who is seen as an effective agent of the counter-revolution. PJW understates his own case though. When he discusses a BBC journalist examining if platforms planned to remove Brand in every aspect, well, let’s just say we know more than one person personally where a “journalist” actually used the power of the publicity they could generate and a dialectical spin on the story to make sure that people who stood in the way of the revolution where destroyed as thoroughly as possible, short of anything that could get them jailed for a long time. Alinsky rule XIII. But much more refined than it was in Alinsky’s day. We also know with certainty that the left uses issues to create a revolutionary positive result, that has nothing to do with the issue itself. The expression, “With the left, the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point” is very important to understand. In this case its more than the destruction of Brand. It is about the destruction of a central pillar of Western thought. The Presumption of Innocence. One cannot have a proper communist authoritarian state until we can do away with that particular central dogma of Western jurisprudence. Communism, like Islam, requires the accusation to be all that is needed to remove an obstacle to state power and state narratives. Watson refrences the presumption of innocence at around 4:50. That is likely the real issue. Speaking of the point is never the point, if only we could figure out why Trudeau is trying to make another Kashogi issue out of a Sikh assassinated in Surry BC apparently. Is it because they send useful meds by mail for Covid, encouraging “vaccine hesitancy”? That makes more sense than anything official.

4. Dr. John Campbell: mRNA in breast milk and the lies they told you to put it there

5. M Files: Enemy propaganda on the mRNA injection push that is ramping up for this fall. Note authors, times and messages.

CANADIAN PRESS –

Amid vaccine fatigue, doctors say the updated COVID-19 shot is important this fall
[…]Health Canada recently authorized an updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, manufactured by Moderna, thattargets the XBB.1.5 Omicron subvariant circulating now. The federal government is sending the new vaccine out to the provinces and territories, which are in charge of rolling it out to the public.
“I think the timing is going to be good,” said Dr. Jeffrey Pernica, head of the division of infectious disease at McMaster University in Hamilton.
[…]HOW THE NEW VACCINES WORK
The updated vaccines specifically target the coronavirus subvariants that are circulating right now, which are “pretty different from the original recipe,” said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization at the University of Saskatchewan.
[…]So even if you got the bivalent booster, it’s still worth getting the new shot targeted to XBB.1.5, she said.
[…]Dr. Lawrence Loh, executive director of the College of Family Physicians of Canada, agrees.
[…]It is safe to get both the COVID-19 booster and the flu shot at the same time, the Public Health Agency of Canada said.
[…]”I think what we sort of leave out when we think about why people don’t get vaccinated is logistics,” said Dr. Kumanan Wilson, chief scientific officer at the Bruyère Research Institute in Ottawa and an immunization researcher. “Make access as easy as possible.”
more :
================================
same author – FEB 2023 :
COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy helps protect newborns, Canadian study suggests
Protection most effective when mothers got 2nd or 3rd mRNA dose during pregnancy, study says
[…]Canadian infectious diseases specialists, obstetrician-gynecologists and immunologists have long urged pregnant people to stay up to date on their COVID-19 vaccinations — including boosters — because they are at higher risk of serious illness if they become infected.
That in turn can harm the fetus, they say.
The study shows that getting vaccinated during pregnancy is also “of great benefit to the infant” after they’re born
more :
======================
LILLEY UNLEASHED: Dr. Tam’s mask sham!

 

Perhaps its worth revisiting our interview with Dr. James Thorp. A highly credentialed OBGYN on the issue of the mRNA and pregnant women and the newly arrived.

Also having a look at this article: https://rairfoundation.com/exposed-leaked-hospital-email-reveals-explosion-of-stillbirths-video/

Thank you all for checking out this site and its perspective.

There is a renewed conversation about Canadian official media, now weaponized past the point of merely being state propaganda. At this point, the main three TV stations, Global, CTV and especially perhaps, CBC are now dialectic weapons of destruction alongside the state as instructed by the ideology of the COMINTERN.

Below, a few videos about the CBC by ex-reporters from that institution. If you have not seen them, it is well worth the watch. As always please click the little gear at the bottom and select the highest quality stream if you want to watch with the best clarity.

Rodney Palmer testifies to the NCI in Ottawa:

The Q&A from the video above:

Rodney Palmer testifies earlier to the NCI in Toronto:

CBC’s Cathy Jones at the NCI

CBC’s Marianne Klowak:

The following is an opinion speech about CBC given at a protest of that organization sometime last winter. It is a very close approximation of how this site felt about that attack vector at that time.

CBC gets served on Parliament Hill Yesterday

People are on to the tactics of CBC overall. Perhaps not the reasons, or each and every nuanced dialectic the CBC used to push the revolution ever onwards, but a lot of people generally know that CBC is at the very least a lying sack of vulture puke. Here a woman tells her story to the CBC reporter that had the temerity to show up on the Hill and finishes with a beautiful summation of what the CBC is. Please watch to the end and enjoy every second of it. The CBC got served. As far as I know, they did not show this video.

CBC interviewed Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson yesterday as well. If anyone happens to find the interview, please post the link to the comments and perhaps, just perhaps we can find another camera that filmed that interview to compare it with. I believe one of her own people filmed it but others did as well.

From a comment below:

 

Catherine Austin Fitts: The attack on Maui, CBDC and the connection between these and other important events [BRICS] as mechanisms of control of the world population

This is really good. Thank you Gates of Vienna for the tip on this one. Tucker’s interview with some guy in the previous post was a bit of a pointless exercise. I added to the post that it likely isn’t worth the time of anyone likely to subscribe to this site.

This however, really is.

Tucker Carlson #22: Who the hell was Obama exactly?

(Having watched this, I can tell all who are pressed for time that you probably will not feel this was worth it.)

Veteran CBC, Globe & Mail journalist, Rodney Palmer gives second testimony to NCI over media’s role in deception, coercion and manipulation of Canadian public

Rodney Palmer is the only person who spoke twice to the National Citizen’s Inquiry, the second time being in Ottawa on May 18th, and the first time testifying was posted on this site from day 1 of the Toronto hearings.

For the bio on Rodney Palmer, please click through to RAIR Foundation, as well as written highlights of his testimony of day 2 of the Ottawa hearings where he spoke again, the videos of which are below.

All I can say is, please watch these videos and those who feel as strongly as we do about what Mr. Palmer has to say, please help it go viral. Keep in mind, some of the more egregious crimes of the CBC are not mentioned. Like how the CBC repeatedly reported that hospitals were overwhelmed with Covid patients and there was triage being done in the parking lots and it was chaos, when in fact, the hospitals at that exact day it was reported, were nearly deserted and the lights were off in much of the buildings. Nurses where doing more choreography than triage. CBC reported on critical crowding of an ICU in Alberta and showed a clothing mannequin in a hospital gurney and tried to pass it off as an ICU patient. CBC was a very close equivalent of Nazi propaganda against the unvaxxed. Nonetheless, this Rodney Palmer testimony is incredibly important to understand what is taking place in Canada now. And for those of you not in Canada, don’t dare think that this is not exactly the same process across the anglosphere.

The file was very large so we had to parse it. Top video is Rodney Palmer’s testimony, the second is the Q&A with the panel.

Rodney got a standing ovation after his presentation from the entire room.

Q&A with the panel and lawyer:

NBC redacts its own report on underwear hammer attack

How corrupted is MSM in the US? Well, now and again they manage to sneak in an actual news report which is problematic for the controllers and they remove it lickety-split.

Tucker spoke about this last night. Will post that show soon.

Global News, MSM and disinformation.

Let’s begin by operationalizing three important and constantly abused terms. Abused mostly by politicians and media with full understanding of the nature of the abuse.

Propaganda: Fairly obvious government messaging that any reasonably thoughtful or aware person can spot.

Disinformation: Deliberate untruths or rhetorical devices intended to harm the target. The target can be an entire population.

Misinformation: The repetition of disinformation by a naive target that believes it and passes it on as truth.

For a sterling example of disinformation, watch Justin Trudeau use that word. He actually uses the word “Disinformation” as disinformation. And I’m sure he thinks that’s clever.

Disinformation has a lot of tactics as well. They can be subtle and hard to spot if you don’t already know they are tactics. One example might be where there appears to be a government leak and the information appears to hurt the government that leaked it but it contains a key bit of disinformation intended to create the behaviour they want. One example might be the leak from early in the Covid years where a Canadian government memo was said to have leaked and talked about building effectively gulags. I don’t remember all the details but I should. This site published it as a maybe-it’s-true item. And it came from a great source within the government but I think as misinformation, not deliberate misdirection.

This site covered a more blatant form of disinformation a few years ago. It is when it fabricated a motive for a leftist Trump hater at a performance of Fidler on the Roof, claiming that the man was a “trump supporter”. Global news was in possession of the facts when they wrote the article claiming he was a Trump supporter, and they did not update the article to correct it to the truth for weeks which is as long as I bothered to check up on it.

The same day the man stood up and drunkenly did a Nazi salute at the play, right before intermission, video was circulating about how he explained to the police in the lobby of the theatre right there at intermission, that he hated Trump so much that the evil doers in the play reminded him of Trump and Trump is like Hitler, so he gave the Nazi salute. Global knew the truth. They could not have not known it as anyone who read the source news would have seen it.

Yesterday was another kind of disinformation. An article about a young boy athlete who suffered a stroke and appears to be in a wheelchair now. 

Before I post the excerpt in question, ask yourself what you would want to know most about the story. What would the single burning question be, not just since Covid, not just since the Vaxx rollout, but at any point, what would you want to know about the story? How his family felt about him? How his team mates felt? A tribute by the Toronto Blue Jays? Or what on God’s green earth would cause a 12 year old who is a healthy athlete to suffer a crippling stroke?

Now add in an experimental gene-therapy that all kids have to take in order to play any form of organized sports and ask the same question. A gene-therapy that is known without argument at this point, to cause blood clots. Especially in athletic young men. So much so that Denmark has now banned the injections for people under 18 years old.

The article gives a lot of nicey fluff about how people feel, although none of it is anger, and then goes on to say this:

Notice how they slipped that in.

For the team, a team that all would have had to take the same injections in order to play, “the cause is the least of their concerns”.

Whoever did that interview was more lawyer than journalist. And I bet I know who has that lawyer on retainer.

But given Global’s track record of outright lies to suit a political narrative we probably can’t know what they really said. And given how the media treats any statement about the injections that may cause people to question taking it, its also easy to see this piece for what it is.

Outright Soviet level propaganda, and disinformation.

And the harm it does and to who?

I’m sure we can all figure that out.

Meanwhile, in Clayton Valley USA, another 12 year old athlete dies due to a “severe medical emergency”.

Two days after he was brought to the hospital, he passed away.

“With deep sadness and heavy hearts, we inform you of the passing of our jr. varsity football athlete. As many of you are aware our jr. varsity athlete unexpectedly experienced a medical emergency unrelated to the sport of football Friday during our evening football practice,” Clayton Valley Athletic Association announced on Sunday.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog

 

COMINTERN agency, Euronews deceptively edits NATO chief to placate audience

This is an update to the post from earlier where the European head of NATO appeared to have made some pro-freedom noises. One of our most perceptive readers has sent in the following comment about this video, which changes its context by 180 degrees.

We have caught Euronews lying to its audience before, and in an equally brutal manner. From memory, one of the best examples is when they showed muslim girls seeming to wave lovingly at the Pope as he drove by them in the Central African Republic (CAR) and cut the audio out so you couldn’t hear that they were actually mocking and deriding him.

They actually used some of the same video and did a voiceover to convey the opposite of what happened. Much like CBC, Global, CNN and CTV do.

Below, the email about the European NATO Chief with much thanks to Kalloi:

The context of the speech under the video you posted actually means the exact opposite of what the title of the video suggests:
‘Freedom is more important than free trade’.
NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg urges countries to look beyond their economic interests in response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as world leaders gather in Davos for the World Economic Forum 2022.
Translation: we are gonna crush the economies of the West (and the rest) by not trading with Russia, using the “freedom” of Ukraine as an excuse; and when you are all on your knees we will enslave you, muhahaha. 
So the Comintern (Euronews) deceptively cut a part of the speech out of contex in order to deceive the viewers, and gave a title to the video that means the absolute opposite of what is being planned in Davos and what Stoltenberg really means, to confuse and mislead folks so that the globalists can rob and enslave them more easily in the framework of the “4th Industrial Revolution”. 
Nothing short of criminal — a war crime in fact, considering the magnitude of the economic warfare being waged on the citizens of the NATO countries and the curtailing of human rights. “Freedom”, my @ss! — How utterly ironical — it is almost as if they are mocking us by uttering that word! They are literally laughing at us while they are deceiving and mistreating us. This little event on Euronews goes to show that it is all a carefully crafted and conscious entrapment of the population; these people (the global parasitic overclass mistakenly called as ‘elites’) are 100% psychopaths. 

If anyone can find the full unedited speech, please post it to the comments here and we shall add it to this post.

UPDATE: Here is the whole speech: