British nurse may see pink slip for wearing crucifix

From the Telegraph U.K.

” They’ve made no provisions for someone like me who has a strong faith. They’re prepared to make allowances for other faiths, but not for Christianity”, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospitals nurse, Shirley Chaplin.

Upon further reading we find this quote from hospital administrators: ” A Muslim woman wearing a headscarf would be seen as a requirement of faith and does not cause a health and safety risk for her patients. This nurse’s faith does not require the wearing of a necklace or a crucifix, so our position is that this is not an issue of faith but an issue of health and safety in the workplace”.

This story is truly astonishing. It is indicative of the greatest of shakedowns; beat the horse into submission until it behaves. A Christian nurse wearing a symbol of her faith produces negative consequences and the potential loss of employment; a Muslim nurse wearing a symbol of her faith indicates a triumphant diversity project achievement likely to win her the accolades of her administrative peers. Make no mistake: the universal right of freedom of religion is first and foremost duly employed if your universe revolves around the orbit of Islam.

Nurse faces the sack for refusing to take off her cross

A nurse is facing the sack for wearing a cross while she cares for patients.

By Jonathan Wynne-Jones, Religious Affairs Correspondent
Published: 9:00AM BST 19 Sep 2009

Shirley Chaplin, a committed Christian, has been told by her employers that she must hide or remove the cross or remain out of the hospital wards.

Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital told her that she cannot wear the one-inch tall silver cross openly around her neck, because it breaches their uniform policy and poses a risk to patients.

While the Trust has banned the crucifix in its wards, it makes concessions for other faiths, including allowing Muslim nurses to wear headscarves on duty.

She has been warned by her employers that she will be suspended if she does not comply with their request. There are fears that this would lead to her dismissal.

Mrs Chaplin, 54, says she has been shocked and distressed by the threat, which means she must choose between her faith and her job.

She has spent all of her career at the hospital and has never been challenged before for wearing the necklace, which she considers to be a symbol of her deeply-held Christian faith.

The move is likely to reignite the row that erupted over a British Airways employee who was told she could not openly wear a cross necklace, and will fuel fears that Christians are being discriminated against in the workplace. Continue Reading →

Germany threatened by al-Qaeda

From TROP

Al-Qaeda Tells Germany To Change Government

By France24
International

al-Qaeda warns German voters to elect opposition or face ‘bad awakening’

Al-Qaeda warned Germans on Friday to change their government in the September 27 election, saying they will face a “bad awakening” if they do not, according to two intelligence monitoring services.

Germany was also told to withdraw its 4,200 troops from Afghanistan or face being attacked at home, the US-based groups said.

In video footage a man identified as Abu Talha the German, and speaking in German, says that if Chancellor Angela Merkel is re-elected, “bitter times await the Germans,” according to IntelCenter and the SITE Intelligence Group.

He asks: “Mrs Merkel, what is the logical outcome reaped by the British and Spanish conservatives by their support for the Iraq war?” in an apparent reference to attacks in Madrid and London in 2004 and 2005.

He appears to suggest that if German voters do not heed his warnings, Al-Qaeda will act within a fortnight. Continue Reading →

Bruce Bawer in Ottawa, a review

The Freethinking Film Society, a Canadian organization committed to providing the nation’s capital with interesting conservative/libertarian films, played host last evening to the much anticipated appearance of journalist Bruce Bawer, author of Surrender-Appeasing Islam, Sacrificing Freedom at the National Library, Archives of Canada to an enthusiastic audience.

The evening opened with a thoughtful introduction of panel members by Fred Litwin of the Free Thinking Film Society, and his blog Gay and Right, and with another to Mr. Bawer from Marc Lebuis creator of Canada’s most influential French language, anti-Islamist blog Point de Bascule. Also in attendance was James Cohen, the Canadian vice-president of the International Free Press Society, a vitally important global group which defends the universal right of free expression and combats those who would threaten it. The speaking panel consisted of four members, all of which brought remarkable qualifications, specific areas of expertise and varying political partisanship– award winning journalist and author Terry Glavin; David B. Harris, former chief of strategic planning for CSIS and currently a Senior Fellow for terrorism/national security at the Canadian Coalition for Democracies; renowned author Bruce Bawer and Marc Lepuis. It was easily recognizable from the start that despite the differences in their political views, the most potent of  similarities between each of these men was a shared and cogent understanding of the very real and direct threat radical Islam presents to universal human values, and to the principle of individual freedoms.

I choose the words universal and human deliberately and carefully, as these terms reflected the basic undertone of the lecture. Each member thoughtfully reinforced the need to concentrate on the human face of this struggle, to reevaluate the usefulness of the popular concepts of left and right political partisanship we have so securely wrapped ourselves in and, to instead, abandon their usage and unite against those engaged in the furious pursuit to coerce and shift the world toward ‘Dar-al-Islam’. It is also important to understand that countless Muslims the world over do not subscribe to the prescription of submission handed them by the fascist elements that live among them. Many suffer greatly with some, bravely seeking  freedom from persecution and enslavement by this hateful and intolerant ideology. It is within this recognition the panel made clear, that we share the most common of ground, where all of us can stand united in direct and strong opposition to extremism.

Mr. Bawer illustrated effectively that we are living in the midst of a jihad most of us do not recognize. We have come to believe that the world suffers only from violent jihad; terrorist plots to murder fueled by an intense hatred of  western values by seventh century crackpots in suicide gear, self-imploding at the behest of foaming and slathering Imams in far away lands. While it is true that terror attacks happen with great frequency, a simultaneous but less spectacular attack is in motion. Far more dangerous than a street lined with bloodied body parts is the quiet jihad, the stealth jihad of the ‘polite’, bridge-building kind which is being played out in quiet neighborhoods, institutions and courtrooms across the western world. This type is patient, cunning and deceitful, culturally informed, well financed and legally savvy. Foolishly so, we are complicit in it’s advancement by both complacency and capitulation through our romantic attachment to such things as cultural-relativism, diversity projects, and multicultural policies. We have become dangerously vulnerable and as Mr. Bawer pointed out, they know it.

Islamists simply do not care which political office holds the power of the day as western legal codes are in and of themselves contrary to Islam. Left, right and the principle of democracy are man-made ‘illegal’ notions, a beyond-the-pale bastardization of the laws of Allah. These gross deeds can only be corrected by employing the scripture of the Quran as brought to the world by the prophet Muhammed in the form of sharia, the only law suitable for all of mankind.

Mr. Harris pointed to the increasing infiltration of the Islamist element seen increasingly in a vast array of institutions. Today in Canada as in western Europe, the political fascism of Islam has found a comfortable and protected footing among a variety of departments, banking institutions, political offices and inter-faith groups. His earnest call that we should insist upon the permanent crushing of section 13(1) of the HRC code received wide applause. Terry Glavin highlighted the moral bankruptcy of the feminist movement while in their staunch pursuit to defend the western woman, many routinely abandon the very same human needs asked of by an Afghan mother struggling against her male aggressors. Mr. Lepuis wondered why Imams in some Montreal mosques continue to stridently condemn Canada to a packed house of primarily second and third generation Muslims and why some honour killings are being committed at the hands of men who have been raised and educated in western nations. Each had cited circumstances clearly reflected in Bruce Bawer’s writing and each had reinforced truths found in Surrender.

Asked to review the speaking engagement given by Mr. Bawer and the accompanying guest panel, I entered the room like most other audience members. I left amazed and moved by three things:  the unflinching bravery of Mr. Bawer and his devotion to reach out to those of us who seek to understand the growing threat of radical Islam and the operation of stealth jihad; the unity, comradeship and professionalism in common purpose held by the panel members to work in tandem against radical Islam and, the realization that we are not defending western values as much as we are defending human and universal ones.

Thank you to Fred Litwin at The Free Thinking Film Society for bringing Mr. Bawer to Ottawa for such an important event. Thank you to Mr. Harris, Mr. Glavin and Mr. Lepuis for their thoughtful analysis, expertise and professionalism and to James Cohen of the International Free Press Society for his attendance. Most of all, thank you to Mr. Bruce Bawer for his courage in writing such a book of importance and necessity, one which helps us to understand the threat of jihad by way of  fundamentalist Islam.

Below, please find a video of Bruce Bawer’s excellent lecture in full. The video of the panel discussion is rumored to be ready and posted within a day or so and should be visible in this post as well, below Dr. Bawer’s lecture.

Link: Bruce Bawer Speech part one

Grace for VTB:

Iraq- the worst place for homosexuals on earth

From The Guardian U.K.

In an attempt to preserve the honour of Islam, gays are being sought out and brutally murdered by Islamist gangs. Their bodies are found lying in the streets bloodied, broken and ripped to pieces often with their genitals removed. Hardline groups spend hours trolling the internet hunting for gay Iraqi men to attack and murder in the latest spate of deliberate cruelty and surging violence aimed against homosexuals in Iraq.

” It is the easiest way to find those people who are destroying Islam and who want to dirty the reputation we took centuries to build up” Abu Hamizi, terror gang member.

How Islamist gangs use internet to track, torture and kill Iraqi gays

Iraqi militias infiltrate internet gay chatrooms to hunt their quarry – and hundreds are feared to be victims

Afif Sarhan and Jason Burke
The Observer, Sunday 13 September 2009
The bodies of gays on the streets of IraqThe bodies of gays on the streets of Iraq. Photograph: Bilal Hussein/AP

Sitting on the floor, wearing traditional Islamic clothes and holding an old notebook, Abu Hamizi, 22, spends at least six hours a day searching internet chatrooms linked to gay websites. He is not looking for new friends, but for victims.

“It is the easiest way to find those people who are destroying Islam and who want to dirty the reputation we took centuries to build up,” he said. When he finds them, Hamizi arranges for them to be attacked and sometimes killed.

Hamizi, a computer science graduate, is at the cutting edge of a new wave of violence against gay men in Iraq. Made up of hardline extremists, Hamizi’s group and others like it are believed to be responsible for the deaths of more than 130 gay Iraqi men since the beginning of the year alone.

The deputy leader of the group, which is based in Baghdad, explained its campaign using a stream of homophobic invective. “Animals deserve more pity than the dirty people who practise such sexual depraved acts,” he told the Observer. “We make sure they know why they are being held and give them the chance to ask God’s forgiveness before they are killed.” Continue Reading →

Australian Muslim group wants holy holidays realized

From NineMSN/9news

Muslims want Islamic holidays recognised

12:18 AEST Sat Sep 12 2009
Keysar Trad says shop owners should recognise Muslim-orientated public holidays. (AAP)
Keysar Trad says shop owners should recognise Muslim-orientated public holidays. (AAP)

Sep 12, 2009

A leading Muslim spokesman has criticised new NSW laws that enshrine the rights of staff to refuse to work on Christian-orientated public holidays.

Do you agree with the new public holiday laws? See what ninemsn readers had to say.

The state government is banning most shops from opening on Christmas Day, Boxing Day, Easter Sunday and Good Friday unless their owners can prove compelling demand from the local community.

Shops will also only be able to open for half a day on ANZAC day.

The new law prevents shop owners forcing staff to work on those days.

Sydney-based Muslim community spokesman Keysar Trad said workers of all faiths were entitled to a break and called for the two main Muslim public holidays to be recognised as well.

“It does give the impression that we are a solely Christian nation and it raises the issue of other religions too, whether you are Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim,” he told AAP on Saturday.

“I know Muslim workers face problems asking for their public holidays off work at the moment.

“There are only two Muslim public holidays, so it is not a lot to ask.” Continue Reading →

All about Islam?

From The National Post/Full Comment.

Michael Coren: Troubled times in my hometown

Posted: September 09, 2009, 9:45 AM by NP Editor

The past tends to be viewed through a defiantly rose-tinted lens. My memory of childhood and youth is one of security, happiness and a glorious ordinariness. I grew up in a town in the south of England called Walthamstow. It’s in the county of Essex but has long been an annex of East London. Working-class, earthy, bland, safe. I remember the local park where we played soccer until it was too dark to see the sweaters we’d thrown down on the grass to act as goalposts.

I write this now because the image is painful and poignant for me. Walthamstow-raised 28-year-old Abdulla Ahmed Ali would meet with his gang in this same park to plan the largest terrorist bombing in British history, one that could have led to the deaths of thousands of innocent men, women, children and babies, including Canadians flying on Air Canada jets from London to Toronto and Montreal. Ali and two others, Tanvir Hussain and Assad Sarwar, were convicted this week of conspiracy to commit mass murder. A fourth man was convicted of conspiracy to murder.

Continue Reading →

Sightseeing? Why not take in the 7/7 bombers’ mosque

Wonders never cease.

From The Telegraph U.K.

Church of England recommends 7/7 bombers’ mosque as tourist destination

A mosque used by the 7/7 suicide bombers is being promoted by the Church of England as a tourist destination.

Martin Beckford and Jonathan Wynne-Jones
Published: 8:00AM BST 08 Sep 2009

The building in Beeston, which the leader of the terrorist gang used as a recruiting ground, is the only Muslim place of worship included in the Church’s official sightseeing guide to religious “staycations”.

It has prompted fresh calls for the Church – condemned last year when the Archbishop of Canterbury called for some aspects of Sharia to be adopted in Britain – to avoid further embarrassment by steering clear of all matters Islamic.

The established religion set up a new section of its website this summer, in order to capitalise on the trend for Britons hit by the recession to take their holidays at home.

It states: “If you are taking a staycation this year, make sure you visit your local church or cathedral – which, via its guidebooks, art and architecture, will more than likely offer an inspiring overview of the history of your area.”

Its guide to the religious attractions of 12 counties suggests days out to historic chapels, abbeys and cathedrals.

But the section on Yorkshire also recommends joining the Beeston Hill Faith Trail, a weekly walking tour that takes in a mosque linked to the 7/7 terrorists, as well as a Sikh temple and an Anglican church. Continue Reading →

Clerics furious over release of women’s rights journalist

From The Independent.

Clerics and hardliners vent their fury at Pervez release

Conservatives threaten backlash over student who promoted women’s rights

By Kim Sengupta in Kabul

Tuesday, 8 September 2009

Sayed Yaqub Ibrahimi, brother of Sayed Pervez Kambaksh, thanked those who had helped secure the young journalist's release
PIERRE VERDY/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Sayed Yaqub Ibrahimi, brother of Sayed Pervez Kambaksh, thanked those who had helped secure the young journalist’s release

Conservative and religious groups in Afghanistan reacted with fury yesterday to the news that Sayed Pervez Kambaksh, who was sentenced to death for promoting women’s rights, has been freed.

After President Hamid Karzai secretly pardoned the 24-year-old student, hardliners called for an urgent ulama, a meeting of Islamic scholars, to organise protests against the decision. Continue Reading →

Britain, abandoned.

Today there are 85 sharia courts operating openly in the United Kingdom. Academic Denis MacEoin authored a recent report published by Civitas, refuting a previous claim that only 5 such courts were in existence and tells of their increase and danger(s) associated with the spreading of Islamic law in Britain.

Mr. MacEoin worries these courts could lead to different legal standards and their application to Muslim and non-Muslim citizens. He says ” It is not a matter of eating halal meat or seeking God’s blessing on one’s marriage. It is a challenge to what we believe to be the rights and freedoms of the individual, to our concept of a legal system based on what parliament enacts, and to the right of all of us to live in a society as free as possible from ethnic-religious division or communal claims to superiority to a special status that puts them in some respects above the law to which we are all bound”.

Sharia_Courts

Among the findings, the report indicates the type of rulings meted out by sharia courts, including the advisement of illegal actions and transgressions of human rights standards as applied by British courts. Sharia courts ban Muslim women from marrying non-Muslim men unless the potential groom agrees to convert and (they) advocate for the removal of a wife`s property rights upon divorce. Despite the increase of sharia courts, there are groups who believe these rulings are restrictive and do not go far enough. Islam4UK is an example of such a group who would like to see Britain become an Islamic state, wholly under the jurisdiction of Shariah law in every matter, whether civil, criminal or otherwise, along with the brutal, prejudicial  and ancient  punishments prescribed by this system. They see this as the inevitable outcome of the Islamic re-population of the U.K. and it appears as though there are precious few in Britain’s current power-base who care to even recognize this threat, let alone assist in preventing it. Continue Reading →

Hate cleric Choudary demands British novelist Sebastian Faulks be tried under sharia

From The Daily Express/U.K.

MUSLIM CLERIC: SEBASTIAN FAULKS SHOULD FACE SHARIA JUSTICE

Story Image

Anjem Choudary
Thursday September 3,2009
By Ted Jeory for SundayExpress.co.uk

MUSLIM firebrand Anjem Choudary caused new outrage last night after demanding author Sebastian Faulks be tried before an Islamic court where the penalty could be possible execution.

He said the bestselling novelist should be hauled before a Sharia court to answer charges that he had insulted the Prophet Mohammed by describing the Koran as the “rantings of a schizophrenic”.

In the interview last week, Mr Faulks added that the English translation of the Koran was a “depressing read”.

Although the bestselling author has since apologised, Islam4UK a radical group associated with Choudary and his mentor, the banned cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed, posted an article on its website entitled, “Sebastian Faulks on a Death Wish?”

The article goes on to say that “with other individuals having faced disturbing consequences over the last few years for similar rants, [Mr Faulks] cannot provide himself an excuse for not being aware of the repercussions of such careless comments, which is a great cause for concern”.

Author Sebastian Faulks

It concludes: “May Allah punish the oppressors and deal with the slanderers.” Continue Reading →

Muslim leader lies, perverts course of justice

Muslim leader who alleged BNP kidnap is arrested

A Muslim community leader who claimed he was kidnapped from his home at knifepoint and dumped in woodland after a BNP hate campaign has been arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice.

From The Telegraph U.K.

By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor
Published: 7:00AM BST 04 Sep 2009

Noor Ramjanally, 36, alleged that he was abducted by two men, bundled into a car boot, driven to Epping Forest in Essex and ordered to stop his religious work.

The BNP had been accused of whipping up racial tensions in the area after it issued an inflammatory leaflet about Mr Ramjanally’s Islamic community group – the first in Loughton.

His alleged ordeal became a cause célèbre among the Muslim community both locally and nationally after it was reported in the national press.

But Mr Ramjanally has now been arrested amid suggestions that he made the whole incident up. Continue Reading →

Virgin Mary painted as female Palestinian suicide bombers

From the Jerusalem Post/Israel.jpost.com

Sept 4, 2009 0:20 | Updated Sept 5, 2009 8:09

‘Female bomber’ exhibit sparks fury in Tel Aviv

By ABE SELIG

An art exhibit depicting various female Palestinian suicide bombers as the Virgin Mary holding baby Jesus, which opened at the Sokolov House press center in Tel Aviv on Thursday, was quickly taken down following an outcry from the families of those killed or wounded in the attacks, as well as by organizations that represent terror victims.

Paiting of suicide bomber...

Paiting of suicide bomber shown at Sokholov House.
Photo: AP

SLIDESHOW: Israel & Region |  World

The exhibit, which featured the work of artists Galina Bleich and Liliah Check, consisted of a series of paintings of the women – some with halos around their heads – rendered to look like Renaissance-era portraits of Catholic saints.

Sokolov House agreed to take the portraits down on Thursday afternoon, but another section of the exhibit – sand and dirt that had been taken from the scenes of the bombings and spread out across canvas – remained on the gallery’s walls.

The artists defended their work on Thursday, but the victims’ families expressed outrage over both the content of the exhibition and the fact that Sokolov House, the headquarters of the Israeli Journalists Association, had agreed to show it.

Dalit Levy, whose 17-year-old stepdaughter Rachel was killed in a suicide bombing as she shopped at the Supersol supermarket in Jerusalem’s Kiryat Hayovel neighborhood on March 29, 2002, along with the store’s security guard, Haim Smadar, 55, arrived outside Sokolov House on Thursday afternoon with an Israeli flag draped over her shoulders, and placed plastic sheeting on the sidewalk.

“You want art?” she asked a group of reporters who had gathered around her. “Here’s art!” she said, before spilling a can of red paint next to a photograph of her stepdaughter and two memorial candles. “This is the blood of our children!”

Almagor, The Association for Terror Victims in Israel, also issued a stern response to the exhibit, and threatened to take legal action if the portraits were not taken down.

“Nahum Sokolov [for whom Sokolov House is named] is rolling in his grave today,” said Almagor’s chairman, Meir Indor.

“We’ve contacted the attorney-general and asked him to take legal action against the exhibition’s representatives,” he added. “Any action that strengthens or praises the murderous acts of terrorism is violating the law and hurting the general public by legitimizing the murders.”

Indor said his group was worried the artists would try to show the exhibit elsewhere.

“We’ve been in contact with the artists, and made it clear that we want them to add information to the material so that people will understand that this is not promoting terrorism, but against it,” he said.

“But at this point it’s unclear if they are willing to agree to that. As it stands, if they continue to show the work the way it is now, we will obviously continue our struggle against it.”

The burqa as liberating choice? not so says Chesler

From the Chesler Chronicles/Pajamas Media.

August 31st, 2009 8:10 am

The Burqa: Ultimate Feminist Choice?

Naomi Wolf Discovers That Shrouds Are Sexy

Women in chadors are really feminist ninja warriors. Rather than allow themselves to be gawked at by male strangers, they choose to defeat the “male gaze” by hiding from it in plain view.

But don’t you worry: Beneath that chador, abaya, burqa, or veil, there is a sexy courtesan wearing “Victoria Secret, elegant fashion, and skin care lotion,” just waiting for her husband to come home for a night of wild and sensuous marital lovemaking.

Obviously, these are not my ideas. I am quoting from a piece by Naomi Wolf that appeared in the Sydney Morning Herald a few days ago. Yes, Wolf is the bubbly, feminist author who once advised Vice President Al “The Climate” Gore on what colors he should wear while campaigning and who is or was friendly with Gore’s daughter. Full disclosure: I have casually known Wolf and her parents for more than a quarter-century. Continue Reading →

Brits pay for squat toilets, footbaths for Muslims awaiting deportation.

From The Telegraph U.K.

This is a story I found buried under an increasing pile of similar ones coming out of Europe. A few days old, but worthy. We don’t agree with the toilet modifications; they didn’t go far enough. Why not simply install sand boxes……

From the dhimmitude files.

Prison spends £17,000 on footbaths and toilets for Muslims

A prison spent £17,000 on special toilets for foreigners and footbaths for Muslims.

Published: 7:00AM BST 27 Aug 2009
Figures obtained from the Ministry of Justice under the Freedom of Information Act show that the money was spent on two footbaths, a “squat” toilet and a shower area at Canterbury Prison in Kent, which only holds foreign nationals awaiting deportation and has 92 Muslim inmates.

Footbaths are often used by Muslims as they are required to wash their feet before prayer. However, the area is not exclusive to Muslims and can be used by all inmates.

The expenditure was condemned by the TaxPayers’ Alliance.

Matthew Elliott, chief executive, said: “It’s ridiculous that we are spending so much money on prisoners who should have been deported, rather than kept here as a burden on innocent taxpayers.

“Making basic provision for people’s needs is one thing, but there is no reason at all why there should be special toilets installed. If prison doesn’t have the perfect toilet facilities for you, then you shouldn’t have committed a crime, it isn’t meant to be nice.”

Canterbury Prison is the first in the country to fulfil the unique roll of holding only foreign national prisoners.

The Prison Independent Monitoring Board’s annual report published in July, showed inmates represent 66 different nationalities, speak 33 different languages and practice 17 different religions.

Amy Bushell, of the board, said: “In the prison’s overall refurbishment programme budget, the cost of the installation was relatively small.

“People who chose to use such facilities cover many nationalities, cultures and religions. We would’ve been greatly disturbed if these had been provided for just one group alone, as it would have excluded other individuals from using them.”

The board also stressed no complaints have been received of non-Muslims being denied access to the area.

Other measures have been taken to accommodate the prison’s global population, including a multi-faith area allowing all inmates to practise their religion. Muslim prisoners are permitted one hour’s use every Friday for prayers.

Islamic prayer timetables are provided, the Koran is available on request and an Imam is employed for 18 hours a week to carry out generic work and faith duties.

Supreme Court of Canada to hear government’s appeal:Khadr repatriation

From The Ottawa Citizen.

Top court will hear federal appeal of Khadr repatriation order

By Janice Tibbetts, Canwest News Service

OTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada will decide whether the Harper government must seek Omar Khadr’s repatriation from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Without giving reasons, the court announced Friday it will hear a government appeal of rulings in the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal ordering the Conservatives to ask the United States to surrender the young Canadian man.

The Supreme Court agreed to expedite the appeal and the case will be heard Nov. 13.

The court’s decision to hear the case means the bench will tackle the thorny issues of what duty, if any, a government has to protect its citizens abroad and whether elected officials should have the discretion to decide when and if they will seek the return of a Canadian detained in another country.

Federal Court Justice James O’Reilly ruled in April that the government, by its years of indifference to Khadr, violated his Charter of Rights guarantee to fundamental justice and, therefore, must seek the 22-year-old’s return “as soon as is practicable.”

In particular, Canadian officials failed Khadr and violated international human rights norms by interviewing him at the U.S. military camp and then passing on the intelligence to American officials, all the while knowing that he had been subjected to sleep deprivation to induce him to talk, O’Reilly concluded.

While the Charter of Rights does not normally protect Canadians accused of crimes abroad, O’Reilly drew heavily on a May 2008 ruling in the Supreme Court of Canada that found all bets are off when it comes to Guantanamo Bay because the process of detaining prisoners at the compound did not comply with either U. S. domestic or international law.

O’Reilly’s decision was upheld last month by the Federal Court of Appeal, with a strong dissenting opinion from Justice Marc Nadon, who sided with the government’s argument that it should have the power to decide whether to request the return of a Canadian detained abroad.

Khadr, who was born in Toronto in September 1986, is charged with murder as a war crime for allegedly throwing a grenade that killed a U.S. army medic on a battlefield in Afghanistan in July 2002.

His trial was suspended in January after U.S. President Barack Obama said the military unit at Guantanamo Bay would close within a year. Khadr is the only remaining westerner at the prison.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has maintained Khadr is charged with a serious crime, and the government should wait to find out if the U.S. intends to drop charges before making any moves.

The government also has said it has done plenty to help Khadr, including requests for consular visits, insisting on medical treatment for the young man, supplying him with educational materials, and seeking assurances he would not be subject to the death penalty.

The current appeal arises from an August 2008 legal challenge filed by Khadr against the prime minister, the minister of foreign affairs, the director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, and the commissioner of the RCMP.

© Copyright (c) Canwest News Service