“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
Here is a popular video of Admiral Lyons from 2015
Here is a CNN video from yesterday. Its well worth watching in the context of what Ace Lyons had to say in the video from the 21st in LA.
This amazing conference in Los Angeles was organized by The American Freedom Alliance,
An original translation by Green Infidel
An increasingly popular recording shows Christians praying, and the reaction of one of them to a black immigrant who played music from his mobile phone while walking by.
Local Christians held a public prayer for a church in Paris, which will soon be demolished. In its place will be built car parks and residential buildings.
At the short recording, one can see firstly a group of Christians praying for the intention of saving the church. At some point, a black man comes up to them, who was disrespectfully playing loud music. Earlier, he had also allegedly shouted insults in their direction and harassed them (this is not on the recording, but according to witness statements).
The matter of St Rita’s church is one which causes great controversy and outrage in the Parisian Christian community. Earlier in the media a recording appeared, which showed the pacification of the church, in which its defenders were praying. According to them, in the face of the increasing Islamisation of France, knocking down another church is nothing other than sawing off the branch on which one sits.
(The name on the video said “Muslim”)
1, The media reports and the facts of the Czech Republic anti Islamic-State stunt of Aug. 21.
2. This is alleged to be a photo of muslims urinating on/in a Church in Munich.
3. Interesting cover for the New York Post
Tomorrow’s cover story: New revelations show a nation for sale under Hillary https://t.co/lHvTEriC5h pic.twitter.com/8Tb7HShon4
— New York Post (@nypost) August 24, 2016
(That is a lot of well trained and well coordinated mental patients in Kabul. I hope all their victims who really are to blame have several pounds of spare Thorazine and similar antipsychotics to help those poor sick people shooting at them)
Trapped Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer Massoud Hossaini writes: ‘Help… this may be my last tweet’
HUNDREDS of students are trapped after gunfire and explosions erupted at the American University in Kabul.
Witnesses report a fierce gun battle at the campus in Afghanistan’s capital.
Multiple militants are carrying out an assault on the university, during which several students have been killed.
One student inside the building said: “Several students been killed and injured; many students and professors are stuck.
5. Raynor Wendt, Police Union chief on dealing with migrants
6. Italy: Migrants kicked off of Swiss bound train as the Swiss show they have maintained slightly more common sense than the rest of Europe.
Thank you Xanthippa, M., Yucki, Wrath of Khan, Oz-Rita, Pym Purnell, Maria J., Kathy, and many many more who sent in materials. Its gonna be a busy day. Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer speaking in LA should be up soon despite the Canadian Government’ best attempts to stop the materials from getting to the editor.
UPDATE 2.10PM: A British man stabbed during a violent attack at a Home Hill backpackers hostel remains in a critical condition at the Townsville Hospital. A 29-year-old French man accused of stabbing three people and a dog while yelling “Allahu Akbar” is in a stable condition.
A 21-year-old British woman was killed during the frenzied attack, which occurred about 11.15pm last night.
The jury may not be in on the Muslim component of this event yet but I think I know how the bookmakers see it.
Thank you Prof. VanHelsing for the Translation.
1, Rebel video showing that the last thing that matters to Black Lives Matter is black lives.
2. Thirty days in jail for a Doctor in Canada convicted of Sexual assault.
Dr. Ismail Taher will be on probation for two years after completing sentence
An Edmonton doctor was sentenced Wednesday to 30 days in jail after being convicted last month of sexually assaulting a nurse at a Medicentre in 2013.
“I am imposing a short jail term because I know it will have a profound effect on Dr. Taher and his family,” provincial court Judge Greg Lepp said in his sentencing remarks Wednesday.
“Dr. Taher has been blessed with all of life’s advantages,” Lepp continued. “He abused his position for selfish, prurient and unwholesome reasons. He had no excuse. There is no remorse shown here.”
After he completes his jail term, Taher will be on probation for two years, Lepp said. He will be allowed to serve his sentence intermittently on weekends.
Taher received a two-year suspended sentence on a second conviction for common assault against a female manager at another Edmonton Medicentre.
(Really, go over and read the whole article. This is horrifying and there is no excuse for someone who has no remorse and is a repeat offender and the offenses are “not trivial” to get such a light sentence.)
3. There is something mighty suspicious about this story. It feels a lot like the beginning of official Balkanization for muslim areas in Montreal. If this site is searched for category, war on dogs, this most certainly seems to add up to something.
An eight-year-old British boy was killed after a hand grenade was thrown into his bedroom as part of an underworld feud involving members of a Somali crime gang in Sweden.
Yuusuf Warsame, from Birmingham, was sleeping in the apartment in the working class Biskopsgarden in Gothenburg when the explosive was tossed through the window and detonated.
Investigating police believe the house was targeted as part of a feud involving members of the Somali underworld.
His father Abdiwahid Warsame today confirmed his son, who was visiting relatives in Sweden, had died in the attack, which is being treated as a murder.
5. Israel shells Syria after stray mortar crosses into its territory
6. I am deeply sorry to feel this needed posting. I have spent decades defending the US and US foreign policy.
7. Australian politician/activist Kirralie Smith on telling the truth about Islam.
Thank you Shabnam, M., Wrath of Khan, Maria J., Shabnam, Tania, Oz Rita and all who sent in materials and there is much more to come.
An original translation by Nash Montana
Completely falsely understood tolerance continuously sprouts new blossoms. All the while the commissioner for women and family at the Bodensee district has no clue just how much her efforts for the good, advance the bad. Women should stick on “defense tattoos”? And whoever won’t do that can be considered as fair game? Apparently it can’t get any dumber than this. The only problem is that it’s dangerous.
If in the past few months there was one single topic that was discussed over and over. Then it was about the fact that we are selling our values. That we are conceding tolerance and religious freedom to people who in return, do not in the slightest concede these same values back to others, such as the freedom of opinions by those leftist informers of the Amadeu Antonio Foundation, which – financed by the federal government – deciding over right and wrong, true and false “hate speech” on the internet. And of course, the reactions over the equality of men and women which, in the aftermath of the reactions to the Cologne sex attacks, was the first thing as part of the refugee crisis, that burned up in big fiery blazes in the name of the welcome culture.
Just what kinds of impudences were women made to endure in this country that only victimized them for a second time? Why is nobody going decisively against how Government only stands and watches idly by, only to then ridicule and mock the victims a second time with clever tips? Is our understanding of the equality for women, their right to bodily, physical integrity, really this weak? What does this say about a supposed modern western country, when in the face of an evident new threat towards women it is the women who are being held responsible?
And what about those that don’t wear stickers?
After Silvester [New Years Eve in Germany] women were told to hold “an arm’s length distance” from strange men. At the Bavarian Broadcast station one refugee helper just recently suggested that young women and girls will have to be educated about how they should act towards asylum seekers, so that they wouldn’t “provoke” them, and now? Stick on tattoos which say “No”?
Wait a minute, you think this is too out of touch? Veronika Wäscher-Göggerle doesn’t think so. The commissioner for women and family affairs at the Bodensee district sees in this campaign that she brought to life an assistance for young swimming guests. She assures: “I do believe that they are very insecure.” Also a cartoon which will be available at public pools will explain what is acceptable and allowed and what not. Wäscher-Göggerle sees the stick on tattoos as an incentive for young pool guests to talk about the issue. Because it shouldn’t come across as a new pool regulation.
Well why not, one might ask themselves. Why shouldn’t it be a new regulation that women aren’t to be harassed or groped? And who really is insecure here? Young people in general? Or mostly the asylum seekers that came here this year and last year? So as when the ‘arm’s length’ alone isn’t enough, then maybe the fingerprint to the stick on tattoo? Just what kinds of people come up with these ideas?
They are the same people who for months now immediately hold up the “youyouyou” index finger whenever another asylum seeker, again, was behaving poorly. People who cannot assert themselves, who are downright afraid of even put their foot down just once, all because one doesn’t want to be a Nazi. Those who still have not understood from which countries many of these asylum seekers actually came from, and that one can and will not stop these people from patriarchal, authoritarian countries, from what they’re doing with stick on tattoos, brochures, and arm’s lengths. Apart from the fact that this shouldn’t be the duty of women and young girls anyway to try and prevent these incidents by making them behave differently than they normally would.
What we see is that the latter is more and more becoming a prominent issue. That many women in the meantime by now are going to public pools with uneasy, queasy feelings. Parents don’t even send their young girls there alone anymore, because they’re afraid. Restrictions for women and girls? Impairment of their daily life? It all has long since begun. Numerous mails directed at me in the past few months speak volumes.
Has always been like this? Where were these tattoos back then?
Meanwhile at Bodensee, people rather point out that there are indeed cases of sexual harassment, but that it’s no different than it was before. And that’s why Veronika Wäscher-Göggerle emphasizes again, that her campaign has absolutely nothing to do with the issue of refugees. “That is completely independent”, she explains. “Sexual harassment in pools has always been happening. “ Yes. Then why this campaign now?
Yeah yeah, those many sexual assaults in the olden days at the pool. I can clearly remember. Just like the multitude of campaigns, brochures, and stick on tattoo initiatives. Even back then they were laying around at every public pool desk because Dennis and Alexander didn’t know how to behave themselves.
One just really wants to ear shatteringly scream from these effronteries. But instead, a cloak of silence is laying over everything and especially us women, we take it, that which we don’t want to take any longer. Because this is not just about a growing danger for our security and physical integrity. This is also plainly about that we are being ridiculed and the butts of jokes. With each stick on tattoo, each clever arm’s length-tip and each prompting to change our behavior, all in the name of not being provocative. We are indirectly made the guilty party and we shouldn’t let this happen to us one more minute if we gave one hoot about equal rights and treatment.
It should be brought to our mind that this beautiful new world was courtesy of us. It is screwed up that stick on tattoos and brochures have to lay around everywhere, that security people are constantly circling us, and that restraint and self limitation has set in before we even realized it. My youth was wonderful. Never once did I have to have second thoughts about whether something could happen to me at the pool. It’s this kind of youth that I wish for today’s girls and boys, because they are impacted by this as well.
It’s so often like this: Exactly because we don’t want to discriminate by claiming these campaigns and initiatives are meant for everybody, one discriminates – and the victims of this discrimination are the german boys and girls, who prior to this had a completely natural way of handling each other, but who now are losing this implicitness with each other because of such campaigns.
Result of such tolerance: hyper-sexualization
Here, as well, the big issue is the focussing on sexuality in Islam, which now by ways of mostly male Mulsim refugees has been brought to us to an even larger extent. Nothing shows the culture clash so clearly as the different ways in which sexuality is handled, and that which does not become an issue until these cultures clash. And now that this happens in ever greater numbers – and we can see that very obviously – we are the ones’ who are adjusting ourselves.
Because, in order to combat the hyper-sexualization of muslims in our daily lives, we come up with strategies (no matter how absurd) to figure out how to avoid these daily incidents, we over-sexualize our everyday life. Where boys and girls before were largely socializing with each other openly and unashamed, and most of them never having had any thoughts about the possibility that one could be sexually harassed, we now convulse with our campaigns and initiatives their social lives. We accuse each boy of being a potential groper, and we tell each girl that she has to always be careful of every boy and man. The consequence is exactly that which one actually sought to prevent: the general focussing on the sexual which in turn determines all of our social life.
An original translation by Ava Lon
By Horatius 18/08/2016
Weapons cache of the Islamic State in West Africa
The Islamic State has publicly responded to statements by Pope Francis that the war waged by the Islamic terrorists is not religious in nature. The article answers the pontiff that their only motivation is religious and approved by Allah in the Qur’an.
Highlights of the latest issue of Dabiq – the official propaganda magazine of the Islamic State – the terrorist group is criticizing especially the naivety of Pope Francis, who’s clinging to the belief that Muslims want peace and peaceful coexistence and that Islamic terror is motivated for economic reasons. In the article “By the Sword” ( “By the Sword”), the authors categorically state: “This is a divinely-sanctioned war between the Muslim nation and the infidel nations.” […]
“Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them”
The article laments that despite the clearly religious nature of their attacks, “many people in the ‘crusaders’ country’ (Western countries)” expressed shock and even disgust because the leadership of the Islamic State ” uses religion to justify violence … Indeed, jihad – the spread of the rule of Allah with the sword – is an obligation that we find in the Qur’an, the word of our Lord, “ says the magazine. “‘Pour the blood of unbelievers'” is a common obligation. The command is very clear: kill the unbelievers, as Allah says, “kill the disbelievers wherever you find them.” “[…]
The fact is that “even if you (the West) stopped bombing us, throwing us in jail, torturing us, to humiliating and driving you us out of our land, we would continue to hate you, because the main raison of our hatred will not disappear as long as you have not embraced Islam. Even if you had to pay the jizyah [tax for infidels] and live under the authority of Islam in humiliation, we would continue to hate you. ” […]
This video, which was sent to me in good faith, is reported to be in Tuscany Italy. For a variety of reasons, this is fully believable. However I have much better information that the original source is one which consistently misrepresents events and frankly had I known, I would not have posted it. New information says that it took place in South Africa. The nation which has the distinction of being the only country on earth with a higher rape rate than Sweden.
It is a real event, but was not an action by Maghrebis in Italy.
An original translation by Nash Montana
This will finally have consequences. A tunisian phony asylum seeker wanted to gouge out his naive german wife’s eyes and injured her severely. For this, the Bautzen circuit judge sentenced him to prison for four years. And he expressed this very clearly: After this despicable offender has sat out his prison sentence he should leave “our country” for ever.
(By Michael Bakunin)
Different media outlets reported on August 16th, 2016, about an incident taken right out of the pages of the asylum seeker picture book of horror. The blonde German Marion Z. (photo, 55 years old, nurse, widowed, probably still having dreams of her fairy tale prince charming and multiculturally well-bred) from the saxony Radeberg experiences a second spring and falls in love empty head over heels in the year 2014 “at a dance evening in Dresden” with the two years younger asylum seeker Kamel K. (small photo, devout muslim, no residence perspective), a man with the looks and the appearance of a steroid-butch whore house operator. He seems to recognize the ticket to entry into the german welfare state in Marion.
He lies about – how often have we heard the same thing before! – his ‘grand undying love’. He let’s her get him a job at the DRK (German Red Cross). Everything went quite well. Then before he could marry the emotionally crippled multiculturally enriched german woman, he was deported to Tunisia. Therefore they immediately got married in an arabic country in the spring of 2015. Apparently the people in their respective offices in that country were either too lazy or too cowardly to suspect foul play and a bogus marriage, so an appropriate test was not administered. The free pass had been issued: because according to article 6, paragraph 1 of the constitution it is allowed that a marriage with a german citizen can be lived-out in Germany; a visa has to be issued, benefits have to be paid.
Therefore already in July of 2015, the man could come back under the cornucopia of the welfare and benefits state. Right after their return, everything changed for the naive german. Are we surprised? “After the wedding he suddenly was a different man.” “I wasn’t allowed to smile at other men, he accused me of cheating on him, he called me a filthy slut.”, the surprised Marion accounts under complete incomprehension. “He became more and more jealous and he accused me I had affairs with other men.” At their common employer, the DRK, where he in the meantime had become a “translator” with refugees, his behavior also turned strange. “He accepted no more women, not even our female boss. He constantly monitored me.” After a few months of muslim oppression tactics and private islamic terror, Madam Z. threw the “charming foreigner” whom she married in a love-crazed moment, out of the apartment in November of 2015 in a bout of lucid clarity.
Those who are familiar with the muslim arabic mentality, will not be surprised that Kamel K. became gallantly angry after these bold assertions by his wife. An unworthy broad, such an incomplete, half human couldn’t treat him like any german boy! (Sure 4:34 does not even have to be cited here.) He began to ambush her. “He threatened me with his fists, he spit in my face”, the Radeberg woman reports. But why she didn’t go to the authorities and why Kamel hand’t been already put on a plane back into the desert, only the gods in Berlin know.
What we do know, on January 23, 2016 he could calmly call Marion Z. and heartily threaten her: “I will gouge your eyes out so that you can’t look at another man, and no other man will want to look at you!” This arabic declaration of love was understood by the now courageous Marion. She reported him at the police and filed for divorce. And again nobody did anything. Kamel K. threatened again, red of anger: “I will take revenge.” On the evening of April 3rd he lay in wait for Marion at the train station in Radeberg on her way to work; he tried to gouge her eyes out with a fruit knife. It was Marion’s luck that our skilled laborer from the orient was too clumsy, so that instead she ended up with a split nasal passage. An emergency operation saved her.
There was no charge for attempted murder or manslaughter (then the district court would have taken on the case). Instead it came to be a case of “severe bodily injury”, which could only be penalized – on probation – with six months. Obviously too big is the respect of a scared prosecution for the immigrant, who in the meantime had brought hundreds of thousands of muslim friends and already had experienced the blessing of the grand muslim mother A. M. (Merkel). Kamel K. now confidently and in domineering fashion claimed during the trial that he only wanted to scare the german woman. That he didn’t see any blood after the “deed”. “My wife lies.” He relished in his lamentations: “She only married me because of the money.” And he complained: “In Germany the laws are made only for women.”
The humane failure of Marion Z. and the failure of the german authorities (federal foreign office, foreigners’ registration office, police, prosecution) was not continued by judge Dr. Dirk Hertle at the circuit court. He immediately took this crime as what it was: The bestial offense of a “lost” arab. He imposed the possible maximum penalty of four years. And he added in clear words: “You terrorized this woman. Your jealous arabic macho attitude has driven you to your crime. That has nothing to do with honor, you cowardly walked away, left your bleeding wife on the ground. I hope that you will leave our country after your sentence – forever.” Our country needs such judges desperately now more than ever. Such words should be heard in every courtroom to finally stop the stupidity of the german authorities who are being kept on strings by the furious freeloading cliques of the established media and politicians. But we all know what now has to happen to judge Hertle. This kind of courage has to be punished by the establishment.
One can assume: Kamel K. will either be punished to a year and a half on probation in his appeal, or he will be released again after a year for reasons of prison overcrowding, “good behavior”, or “traumatic experience during flight and persecution”. The politically controlled constitutional state knows many ways and tricks so that nobody who really deserves it, receives a fair punishment – especially not culturally sensitive muslims.
And then K. will probably, with the help of another blue eyed German woman, enrich the country until the end of its days. The scars in Marion Z.’s face will stay forever. May they be a warning for the sacrificial lamb and for all who are or want to become refugee sweethearts.
Original translation by Nash Montana
WALDENBURG. Asylum seekers in saxony Waldenburg refused to do community work, because they were the guests of chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU). That is what the mayor of the city, Bernd Pohlers (Freie Wähler) told the Gazette.
According to him, the city had created seven different work opportunities in order to give asylum seekers something to do, to counteract against boredom and to increase their acceptance within the population. The jobs included 20 hours per week at a hourly wage of 1,05 Euro. They were approved by the district in Zwickau.
After April all male inhabitants of the local refugee home could have taken part in the community services in the city limits. During the first week everything seemed to go well. The asylum seekers were picked up, brought to their respective places for work, and then they were brought back home again. But shortly thereafter the asylum seekers completely changed their attitude.
Asylum seekers wanted minimum wage
“Later on said persons were arguing that they were guests of Frau Merkel and that guests therefore shouldn’t have to work”, so described mayor Pohlers the scene in the June issue of the city gazette. “Furthermore there was the opinion that there is a minimum wage (8,50 euro) in Germany, and that this should then therefore be paid by the city of Waldenburg!”
Pohlers: “Seeing it as my duty to report this situation”
He’s well aware that his words could play into the hands of people criticizing the asylum crisis, the mayor wrote. But he also had called for multiple fundraising campaigns which had met with huge success among the population. “And therefore I see it as my duty to inform people about the current situation, even as this is difficult for me and I have been advised not to, from many different sides.”
The city of Waldenburg did confirm to Junge Freiheit that asylum seekers are indeed to this day not working. Among the population the mayor’s article had gotten positive resonance. Many citizens had shown gratitude that Pohlers had found the courage to tell the truth about the asylum seeker’s refusal to work, one co-worker of the mayor says.
The city had acquired work clothes in the amount of 700 euro for the asylum seekers. They’re going to be sitting on these clothes now according to a report by “Freie Presse”.
More precisely, the parents of the two Sunni Muslims who paid good money to attend a private school, and signed an agreement with the school, or perhaps a memorandum of understanding might better put, that this is a secular school, and in order to accommodate the diverse array of backgrounds of students, all religious practice would be outside school ground and hours.
An Alberta judge has upheld a human rights decision that found a private school discriminated against two Muslim students by not allowing them to pray.
The Alberta Human Rights Commission tribunal found in 2015 that Webber Academy in Calgary unlawfully discriminated against the students and fined the school $26,000.
The boys, who were in Grades 9 and 10, testified that praying is mandatory in their Sunni religion.
The school, in appealing the tribunal’s decision to the Court of Queen’s Bench, argued that the boys’ parents were told Webber Academy was non-denominational and there was no space in the school for praying.
Here is Ezra on the original decision:
Before we move on to my own analysis of this decision and its consequences, here are a couple of videos on this and similar issues which vanished along with previous Youtube channels but I restored for this article.
From Canada, 2013
2012
What do all these have in common? Besides the fairly obvious that its all submitting to Islam. Including the Halloween one?
It has to do with the way socialism offers power to the individual.
In a classically liberal society, the premise is more or less that the individual has rights. That those rights allow you to live as you like but not limit the rights of others. That you are free to believe what you want but not act on beliefs in a way that limit the rights of others.
That the government’s primary job is to protect your rights.
This makes the individual powerful in the sense that they can achieve what they want to the extent that they are capable.
Overall it works spectacularly well and nations that implement this thinking thrive to the extent that it is implemented. Creativity and ingenuity soar.
Frankly if anyone is able to write a history of the world a century or two from now, they may say that Western liberal democracies where the Eden that the bible spoke of in some meaningful ways.
Trust is the invisible matrix that allows us all to revel in each other’s accomplishments and use the fruits of our labour to barter for the fruits of each other’s.
The trust flows from the solid notion that each of us are free to pursue our own interests and that others who try and limit our ability to do so, are committing a crime as a general rule. They would be violating our rights. Even the government is limited by law as to how much they can interfere with our ability to pursue self interest.
Now if we look at Islamic and Marxist systems we see a very interesting skewing of the power equation for the individual.
The individual has the power to destroy a neighbor so long as it furthers the absolute grip on the public by the religious or socialist authority.
If a person has an issue with you that has nothing to do with politics or religion, exposing you to Islamic or socialist authorities as being ideologically incorrect can mean the end of your career, now common in the UK and Western nations if you take issue with government policies on destructive mass immigration, or feel that Islam as a doctrine is not healthy for other peoples. In which case you can face the same, or often death, or torture as prescribed by sharia.
This kind of power is given to each and every individual, and feeds on the meanest and most characterless aspects of our nature.
If two neighbors have been tolerant of each other for a decade and then one does not wish to return a borrowed lawnmower, a blasphemy charge can be leveled against the lender and then its his to keep!
Once an area is sufficiently Islamic no trial is even needed, or official procedure of any kind. We see that daily in Pakistan and elsewhere. In socialism bureaucracy is mandatory so that might be a slight difference between the two systems.
In socialism however, children are fed the newest superstitious nonsense of the narrative and then sent home to inspect their parents homes and bring back a report so that the authorities can start admonishing you about using toasters that create too much carbon dioxide and cause catastrophic global warming. But nothing goes the other way.
Any attempt to use the same system to preserve law and equal rights will face insurmountable obstacles. If you try and use your kids to spy on the teachers and school boards and force them to stay within the legal limits we are used to, you may enjoy the occasional success. But the new model of “co-parenting” that teachers believe they are involved in, means that the power that using kids as snitches is a one way street. For the benefit of the state in implementing cultural Marxism,
The individual does not have the power to apply the exact same reasoning, laws, or processes to any end except the deconstructionist end. Destroying halloween and Christmas to replace them with an African drum ritual for example. but no drum rituals will be removed for Halloween or Christmas.
The school which lost the appeal will not be able to sue the parents for signing a document in bad faith, and that was clearly intended to create the exact circumstances required to advance Islam’s authority and make a pile of cash while at it.
The power of the individual is only when they are advancing Islam, socialism, or otherwise deconstructing classical civilization.
When a high school aged child in the US is ordered to remove a patriotic T shirt at school because it offends Mexican students, its a near perfect example of this principle in operation, where a tiny fraction of the population holds power over the majority to the extent that it actually crushes their constitutional rights as guaranteed by law.
A couple of examples. This one used the totem of a Mexican holiday to justify the crushing of the rights of the American students at an American school.
More recently, the dry language of impenetrable bureaucracy was used here to explain why firemen had to remove American flags from the back of their trucks. That way there really couldn.t be a protest where the issue could be put on a sign. Its hard to get people to rally behind “We demand the right to use the right sized grommets on a properly installed fabric on a moving vehicle”.
Islamic notions of propriety will always trump non-islamic ones. Notice how rules change at public pools even though they violate actual equity laws for Muslims.
Public functions in Canada which serve food make sure its all halal now. A Christian, who is not allowed to eat foods consecrated to another god has no voice to complain, or if they do, there are certainly no ears to hear them. They may find themselves on a list for the racist and intolerant.
Socialism and Islam both use the same method of empowering individuals for the purpose of tightening an iron and totalitarian grip on the public. And its very seductive. The Soviet union, which was as bad a system as you can imagine, survived nearly a century. North Korea is into its 3rd generation of despots showing that most people enjoy having the power of life and death over everyone they know with a single snitch more than they like using plates and cutlery to contain their food over a dumpster.
To resist this method of replacing liberalism with totalitarianism requires character and self sacrifice on behalf of the majority of the population.
One wonders what the odds of that working might be.
Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.
And then this example showed up a few minutes later. I am confident that people will supply a large number of great examples of exactly this process at work in the comments. Thank you all in advance.