Category Archives: Links and news

It is very important to understand the mechanisms under what we are fed as “information” today.

What we are experiencing is NOT “two tier policing”. Nor is it “Hypocrisy. It is a well laid out blueprint by the UN, EU, WEF, Bilderberg people etc. etc. Who Stephen Coughlin refers to as, “The powers that be” or PTB.

Start with this RAIR article on some of the solid evidences of this. below, a few more examples that really should be a slam dunk for the case. We all see these examples every day all over social media. What we are asking for here, is for people to see it differently in order to come to an actual understanding of the cause, rather than just an endless amount of rage and frustration from seeing its result.

1. The story below represents two separate Lines of Effort. The communist one to deracinate Western identity and individualism. But also the Islamic one to replace Western Rule of law and equality with sharia and Islamic supremacy.

Here is Grok’s explanation of the post, as I was not familiar with this tradition and needed context on this event:

Tommy Robinson criticizes the arrest of a 56-year-old man in Moygashel, Northern Ireland, after a replica mosque and signs reading “Secure our borders” and “End the threat of radical Islam” were placed on a large loyalist bonfire ahead of July 12th commemorations marking the Battle of the Boyne.
Police detained the man under Article 9 of the Public Order (NI) Order 1987 for suspected display of material intended to stir up hatred, with the PSNI confirming the action amid widespread condemnation from politicians and church leaders.
The post and replies frame the incident as disproportionate policing of political protest during traditional unionist bonfire season, contrasting it with other controversial displays that have not led to similar enforcement.

2. De facto sharia:

3. Unrelated really, but someone should make a movie Kind about. this.

We all know the facts. The guy who threw the rock would never face an hour in jail or a day in court. The guy who took retribution might have his life completely destroyed based on the laws as they are written, and the law as it is now deployed, which is what this post is about.

So how bad are things really when people are ready to risk the consequences of the unfairness of the system to deal with these matters themselves?

4. How much time do you think he will actually serve, and will it deter him from his goals?

5. The swapping out of Rule of Law for Sharia appears to be moving from the Commonwealth to the USA now

On that subject, read RAIR Foundation. They are the most up to date on the Islamification of the United States.

Thank you all for checking out this site. 

A couple of sorta random data points:

1. Diana West: Marx Didn’t Distinguish Between “Communism” and “Socialism”; Why Should We?

NB: This column in its original form ran in The Epoch Times on February 3, 2020. As Americans once again clash over the unimportant and purposefully distracting “differences” between socialists and communists, it seemed like a good time to run it again.

When President Donald Trump told Fox News host Sean Hannity that he believes the Democrats’ frontrunner, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), is a communist, the president clarified, “You could say socialist,” but then again, “I think of Bernie sort of as a socialist but far beyond a socialist.”

As the pundits trip over poli-sci-class definitions, my question is, what’s the difference?

As far as freedom-lovers go, safeguarding our liberties guaranteed by the Constitution, there is none. To be sure, communists and socialists argue and split hairs. They fight and break heads. But they also work together and destroy liberty because they all travel to the same soul-crushing destination of collectivism.

What anti-communists need to know is that communists and socialists—and “democratic socialists,” Fabians, progressives, “Alinskyites” (not to mention most Democrats and an awful lot of Republicans)—believe in the same centrally planned, varyingly totalitarian vision for America that our Founding Fathers would have had to declare independence from all over again.

To that point of ideological convergence, here are a couple of argument-settling quotations from recognized experts—one, from the anti-communist camp; the other, from the communist camp.

Please read the rest of this important post at Diana’s substack. This does matter. The number of arguments I have had with Canucks over Canada, or Scandinavian countries being Socialist not communist etc. is large. Even the ones well onside tend to look at socialism as a gateway drug for communism. In fact, becoming communist like an area becoming Islamic. its a process, always moving towards more of itself.

Our personal view is that what Canadians see as “socialism” in Canada, obviously prior to the communist revolution of the election of Justin Trudeau, is actually just civilization. Stay with me here a minute please.

Civilization is about skimming surplus wealth from a culture within a jurisdiction or polity that allows the state to make everyone’s lives better. Roads, rail when needed and useful, infrastructure, police, military to protect the liberties and culture of the state etc. And as the people get more affluent because of their activity, it may generate more tax revenue that could allow for more things that in theory could make life better for everyone. THIS IS NOT Socialism.

This is civilization.

Socialism is not state paid medical care. Socialism is when the state decides who is worthy of it for political or narrative reasons. When people are discriminated against within the system for any demographic or political reasons. Most of what we see in Canada is the retaking of legitimate civilizational impulses for the purpose of destroying civilization itself. The Cloward Piven Strategy is an apex example of this.

Socialism/Communism is diabolical. It is the evil transformation of all that is good into a destructive, hate filled, cynical force of destruction. It is the obliteration of all that is right and good. It is no accident that before Marx started in on his Communist writings he was a Satanist. Wrote poetry to Satan and his disciple, Saul Alinsky, dedicated his most famous book, Rules for Radicals to Satan.

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

As it turns out, Solzhenitsyn agrees.

Templeton Prize Address (1983) – “Men Have Forgotten God”

“Within the philosophical system of Marx and Lenin and at the heart of their psychology, hatred of God is the principal driving force, more fundamental than all their political and economic pretensions. Militant atheism is not merely incidental or marginal to communist policy; it is not a side effect, but the central pivot. To achieve its diabolical ends, communism needs to control a population devoid of religious and national feeling, and this entails the destruction of faith and nationhood.

Anyway, please click through to Diana’s full article.

2. Extrapolating on what we have seen the Trudeau/Carney state do up to now, we think the black redacted square in this document which was redacted, would likely be an aporxamation of: Any speech published from any kind of authoritative position that is in defiance of or contradiction to, a state narrative. It won’t be those exact words. But it will be that concept. The definitions they use to describe speech that is verboten also is so nebulous that it can be interpreted however the state wants and to whomever the state wants. Just like it is now for hate speech etc.

This documents specifically lists a number of Maoist mass line narrative attacks as things that need to be protected. The memo also explains that the CSE will be the ones to “educate Canadians on on what disinformation is, while also increasing awareness of who creates it and why they do it.”

Ladies and gentlemen I would like to point out that the photo below is in fact of the CSE, Canadian Security Establishment agency building HQ in Ottawa:

If anyone had been told for the last several thousand years that a man could become a woman or a woman could become a man merely by declaring themselves as such, and various mutilations could be done to slightly approximate the effect but not the reality in any reproductive sense, and then had it explained to them that the word, Disinformation means the deliberate spreading of a falsehood in order to damage a target, then the flag on the CSE HQ the size of a soccer field would perfectly constitute disinformation.

Watch the video and be afraid. And send it to anyone you know in Canada, or that needs to understand the nature of Canada as it actually is and as it is becoming today.

3. Wanna know why the British government took away force multipliers from the public?

A few facts on how the British people dealt with guns, the public and the police prior to 1920:

Gun ownership was more common in Britain (especially pre-1920) than it is today. Middle-class and upper-class people could legally buy handguns and rifles relatively easily for self-defence, sport, or protection of property. There was no strict licensing system like today.
British police (bobbies) generally did not carry firearms routinely. This was a deliberate policy from the founding of the modern police force in 1829 — they were meant to be a civilian force, not militarised.
There were occasional incidents where unarmed police borrowed pistols from members of the public during emergencies. The most famous example is the Tottenham Outrage in 1909, where during a long armed chase, several police officers borrowed handguns from bystanders to return fire. Some civilians also joined the chase while armed.

Anyone think Pakistani harems of British children would have been a thing then?

4. Conservative Treehouse has this exactly right. The CBC is an extension of the Canadian government, and uses some of the same condescending devices especially used by Trudeau and Carney. Especially when they state what Canadians think, feel and what our culture is.

U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra appears for an interview on CBC News to share perspectives on U.S-Canada relations.  However, what happens within the interview is a case study on how Canadian media represent an extension of the Canadian government.

This example is exactly why the Canadian people have no reference point for information counter to the official propaganda policy from their government offices. Rebecca Zandbergen, host of CBC’s Ottawa Morning represents the voice of government in combative tone, condescending attitude and refusal to accept counter arguments.

The level of passive-aggressive condescension highlights why Canada has continued to lose position in a world where pretending has become devalued.  However, it’s clear why the Canadian people will be stunned when it all collapses around them.  They have no reference points. Ambassador Hoekstra should get hazard pay. WATCH (prompted):

The best thing I have seen on this was something along the lines of, ‘The Canadian people may or may not realize the fact that the Elbows Up movement has in fact become the Ankles Up one. Read the article over at the

5. When South Africa has street demonstrations against mass immigration, you know something huge is going on, and where the people of the world have no damn say in their own affairs or governance.

And when one of the signs reads against not have any “no go zones” we can assume the issue is Islamic immigration.

Thank you all for checking out this site, and to Gates of Vienna for several tips on things concerning the world and Canada.

1. The Rebel does a story on the switch to ALL Halal chicken at popular food franchises. They actually cover it very well.

But I have it from a few restaurant insiders, that pretty much all the meat, at least in Ottawa is Halal. And I am old enough to remember conspiracy theories that the “jews” were secretly planning to take over the food supply and make ebverything Kosher. At this point, it would be better if they had. Part of the money collected for Halal food goes to Zakat. Zakat ONLY goes to Muslim charities, and some of that is for jihad. Certainly of one kind or another.

There are also very significant differences between Kosher and Halal. Kosher guarantees purity of the certified food for one thing. Halal guarantees that it is consecrated to Allah, and that it advantages one community. Also Kosher foods never meant the lack of options for others. And now, with a 5% Muslim population in Ontario, the option for non-Halal food is vanishing in a statistically significant way.

There might be a couple of things David Menzies doesn’t get though. Making things Islamic, making them sharia compliant, is a process. And while Wendy’s might still offer bacon on the menu, it could be turkey bacon, or they haven’t quite managed to get it removed yet. They being the forces of Islam. Secondly, it is not to avoid any kind of cross-contamination. After all, like the Left, with Muslims, the point is well, often not the point. It is to make the region Sharia compliant. It is not that they want options for themselves. it is that they do not want the rest of us to have our own culture. This is a very, very important point. And this is also unique to Islam as a religion, but not as a system. Communism we see, also makes up reasons to deny the people any choice other than the one the state presents to us. To not want that choice is blasphemy a hate crime.

2. Looks like England is now replicating the Canadian bill C4 on ‘Anti-Conversion therapy’. The real take away here is the fact that anyone who doesn’t get this is a communist revolution across the Western world is stubbornly refusing to see it, or wants it and wants you not to believe it is happening.

3. One finds a dozen of these a day without looking.

Really.

The state’s response to this, so far in Europe but in Canada any moment now, is to block people from getting this information or block the means of accessing it. There are in the COMINTERN (EU, UN Canada) increasing calls to block Twitter because it contains things that are trie and a threat to the narrative and the carrying out of the deracination of Western civilization by mass importation of these guys, and other means.

4. The DSA are Communists. Communists V1.0, not any kind of Neo-communists.

The following video is now several years old. Which makes it more important in this case. Not less.

Watch it carefully and more than once.

5. Another of today’s dirty dozen

Thank you all for checking in on this site, and leaving comments and news links.

Calgary Police play Hide and go Sikh

Calgary Police in Canada have charged 16 people suspected of being part of a large, violent foreign criminal ring that extorts victims. Fifteen are out on bail. Investigators believe the legal names associated with these individuals may not match the names they are known by.

Since the investigation began last year, prosecutors have documented 19 extortion-related shootings. In the Prairie region of Alberta, the Canada Border Services Agency (similar to ICE) has opened 138 immigration investigations and issued 37 removal orders related to the extortion ring.

None of the 16 charged are Canadian citizens.

Pictured:

Ravjot Toor, 20
Germanjeet Singh, 22
Jaskaran Singh, 21
Karanbir Singh, 21
Amandeep Singh, 21
Anurag Sidhu, 21
Ishandeep Singh, 19
Amandeep Mallhi, 39
Sandeep Singh, 32
Daksh Gautam, 25
Akashdeep Singh, 19
Gagandeep Singh, 29
Pardeep Singh, 24
Taranveer Singh, 24
Gurkaran Dhaliwal, 21

1. Watch the Anglican ‘priest’ in this video make a claim about islam which cements him as a far leftist activist on the path of the destruction of the West.

Not sure why, or if it matters, but this priest also reminds me a little of Freddy Mercury from Queen.

2. This guy has the gist of the nature of the CBC. He could have said it with far fewer minutes for sure, but still, it is good to see people getting it without deflecting to some allowable counter-narrative.

For a proper understanding of the event itself, Natasha in Montreal did a lot of her own research to find out exactly what did happen. For us, the CBC’s role is the most important, as their deceptions and active measures are consequential to all Canadians. But in terms of what actually took place, Natasha has the best coverage.

3. On Canada’s Bill C-8, or Bill C-26 under Trudeau.

Full text:

Bill C-8 IS NOW LAW: Canada’s WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE NIGHTMARE Explained!!

On June 16, 2026, Bill C-8 (formerly Bill C-26) received Royal Assent and became official.

This legislation gives the government sweeping new surveillance powers, including:

– Warrantless access to your subscriber data, location, browsing history, metadata, and more

– The ability for one minister to secretly order your internet or phone service shut off with no court review

– Secret gag orders preventing companies from telling you why your service was cut

– Broad powers that could force weakening of encryption

Sold to Canadians as a “cybersecurity” bill to protect critical infrastructure, it actually delivers massive new warrantless spying powers and internet kill switches with almost no oversight.

In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what’s in Bill C-8 and what it means for your privacy.

Please share this video far and wide because most Canadians still have no idea this just became law!

4. At least once their lives, every muslim is obliged to go to Mecca and observe some ritual rock kissing.

5.  Here is a proper review of Citizen Vigilante by someone who actually gets it for what it is, and much more importantly, WHY it is. Please read. And someone send it to Viva Frei before his sanctimony about the movie gets the better of him.

Director Uwe Boll just released a movie that is ticking off all the right people.  Called Citizen Vigilante, it is an unapologetic rejection of globalism, mass migration, Islamic conquest, and “woke” leftism.  The movie bashes politicians, judges, NGOs, and law enforcement agencies that have bent over backwards to excuse inexcusable crimes committed by non-Western immigrants.  It unequivocally demands a return to law and order.  It urges viewers to seek justice.  It threatens the continuing survival of any Western government that continues to allow outsiders to prey on its nation’s citizens.  Boll’s movie is nothing less than a call for Westerners to revolt against the authorities who have refused to keep them safe. 

Thank you all for checking out this site, 

A quick word about the film, Citizen Vigilante.

A LOT of reviews of the movie are all over the place. Viva Frei did a brutal take down of it.

In our opinion, people who review it as a movie entirely miss the point. It isn’t a movie, which I read that Elon Musk made the most popular movie in the world, which is a great film. it isn’t. If we wanna play Siskel and Ebert it’s two thumbs down.

The reason it’s great is that someone told the truth in pop culture. And that is the start of a counter-revolution in an era where you cannot see a commercial where a happy couple isn’t mixed race white and something else.

Where Islam is the repository of the world’s wisdom etc. etc.

It is that it informs us that the state has created and sides with the problem, and if there is any hope in solving it, that hope lies with the people. As is so often the case historically.

1. US attacks Iranian weapons platforms after Iran violates terms of cease fire.

We could go into a lot of detail about how Islam does war, and how it does peace as a tactical maneuver of war. This is a fact. If memory serves, when the US signed a pact with the Muslims in Tripoli after the ‘Barbary Pirate Wars’ (Sea jihadis or pirates) they made 2 copies for the US to sign, One, an English version and Two, an Arabic one that did not say exactly the same thing. This kind of duplicity goes all the way back to the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah.

But I would like to offer a more geopolitical perspective. The Islamic one is critically important and we all have to hope and pray that Trump understands Islamic thought and strategy well enough to not be defeated by it, like pretty much everyone else has throughout history.

The approach I would like to take, is the Raison d’être of the US Navy.

People call America a colonial power. We don’t think so. The US a century ago made the strategic decision to have a powerful blue-water Navy for the purpose of keeping the oceans safe for trade. This allowed other nations, connected to the US or not, to become vastly more prosperous than they had been before. Remember, Chris Columbus actually tried to sail around the world just to avoid the Muslim pirates that had been making trade impossible with India and the Orient. Muslims had been taking cargo ships, the merchandise as the booty of jihad, and the sailors as slaves since the time of Mohammad.

I asked Grok for a summary of Thomas Jefferson’s interaction with the Muslim sea jihadis and this is it:

Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with the Tripolitan (Tripoli’s) ambassador to Britain, Sidi Haji Abdrahaman in London in March 1786. 

This is the famous encounter during the early Barbary pirate crisis, when North African corsairs (from Tripoli and other Barbary states) were attacking and capturing American merchant ships, enslaving crews, and demanding tribute (protection money).

Jefferson was the U.S. Minister to France; Adams was the U.S. Minister to Britain.

They were trying to negotiate peace treaties and ransom captured American sailors/ships after attacks in 1785.
The Barbary states claimed a religious and legal right to raid non-Muslim (especially Christian) shipping in the Mediterranean.

How the Conversation Went

They met at the ambassador’s house in London. The discussion covered two main parts:

Peace treaty terms — The ambassador demanded very high payments (e.g., tens of thousands of guineas in cash upfront, plus his own commission) for even a temporary or “perpetual” peace. Adams and Jefferson found the demands far beyond what Congress had authorized.
The key question about “why” they were attacking American ships — Since the U.S. had done nothing to provoke Tripoli, Jefferson and Adams asked about the grounds (“pretensions”) for making war on nations that had done them no injury. They noted that Americans considered all mankind as friends unless provoked.

The ambassador’s reply (as recorded in their joint letter to U.S. Secretary of Foreign Affairs John Jay, dated March 28, 1786):

“The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the law of their great Prophet: that it was written in the Koran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their Authority were sinners: that it was their right & duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, & to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners; & that every Musselman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
He added practical details:The first man to board an enemy vessel got an extra slave as incentive.
Their corsairs would approach a ship with each sailor holding a dagger in each hand and another in his mouth, which terrified crews into surrendering quickly.
He believed the Devil helped them, as they were almost always successful.

Jefferson and Adams found the demands excessive and told him they needed fresh instructions from Congress. No agreement was reached.

Aftermath and Significance

Jefferson reported the conversation (and the ambassador’s justification rooted in Islamic doctrine) to Congress. It reinforced his belief that paying tribute would only encourage more demands and attacks, rather than solving the problem long-term. This helped shape his later policy as President: building a navy and using military force (the First Barbary War, 1801–1805) instead of endless tribute.John Adams was somewhat more open to negotiating tribute at the time, but the meeting gave both men direct insight into the religious justification the Barbary states used.

Primary source: The March 28, 1786, letter from Adams and Jefferson to John Jay (available in the Adams Papers and Founders Online archives). The quote above is taken directly from it.This episode is one of the earliest direct American diplomatic encounters with the ideological/religious motivations behind Barbary piracy. Let me know if you’d like the full letter text, more context on the Barbary Wars, or related quotes!

For those interested in the Raison d’être of the Barbary Pirates, learn about the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah.

The US decided that being able to keep the oceans open for world trade was the path to peace and prosperity for all. This turned out to be absolutely true. Once the oceans became safe for commerce, all nations that even had the potential for production continually got wealthier, generally healthier to a point, and had easier lives. Now and again pirates appear on the scene, but its small scale and dealt with rapidly. That is until modern times where leftists supranationals are using Islam as a battering ram against Western Civilization.

So one can see that the US cannot, will not and MUST NOT ever allow a nation like Iran to threaten world trade and doubly so, the world’s energy supply which is also being sold at way above market value due to monopolizing the supply via OPEC.

So whatever else people may think about this war, let’s be clear. The oceans must be safe for commercial traffic. And the US has footed the bill for this in blood and treasure for 250 years and to the benefit of the entire world, that participates in international trade.

2. The European Commission have shut off air conditioning for employees in their Brussels headquarters, while leaving the AC on for themselves

(A better example of communism I cannot think of. Well except there is no direct torture, forced confession and imprisonment for imputed crimes that are not really crimes anyway)

This toaster-themed building is the Berlaymont, and as the enormous gaudy banner on the front suggests, it is the headquarters of the European Commission, the executive branch of the European Union. The Berlaymont is in Brussels, and Brussels is in Europe, where the weather has been unseasonably warm, with daytime temperatures rising well above 30C (or 90F).

Happily, the Berlaymont has air conditioning, unlike many hospitals and care homes in Europe. Unhappily, the Berlaymont air conditioning system seems not to work so well in the heat, and so the European Commission felt compelled to turn it off – but only for lowly employees of the Commission. Commissioners, including Ursula van der Leyen, continue to enjoy cool air in their own offices.

I would be willing to make a bet that the people who are high enough up the food chain to still have air conditioning in their offices, are likely never or nearly never actually in them in the summer. Or possibly ever.

3. An excellent example of how the left and Islam use political correctness to create no win scenarios for Western minded people. Especially the kindest and most dedicated for the common good amongst Western professionals.

4. If he is not fully correct about all societies, it’s very close. And certainly true for Western civ now.

5. I wonder how long till he is back on the streets with zero dollar bail. Or did that happen already?

1. Montreal yesterday. We are still, or perhaps more honestly, “I” am still in the ‘fog of war’ stage on this story. Many events which have not resolved yet into a coherent set of definable events for analysis.

There appears to be two separate or related events in Montreal yesterday. The one everyone knows about near a Middle Eastern grocer where a police officer was killed, another injured and a Rabbi was killed, apparently by a female officer nearby at point blanc range. That has sparked the usual debates. And debates worth having. One might think intuitively that women would be faster to use force multipliers as they have a natural disadvantage in speed and strength. Unless of course they are men LARPing as women in sports. In which case… back to the point, this may or may not be the reasons here.

The shooter, who may not have actually killed anyone, as its increasingly looking like cross fire in all case except the shooter himself who was killed by an officer, left a manifesto. And the CBC was given early access to it in order to fabricate a narrative. The CBC did not disappoint. And in this they never do. They claimed it was an ‘Incell”. this is a word used by leftist agencies to try and move the muzzle of the barrel off of the real target and on to what they want destroyed dialectically. Straight white males.

Incell is short for, “involuntarily celibate”. In other words, a male, always so far a white one, who is frustrated that he can’t get laid by a woman. This has so many dialectical advantages. It clears him of whatever his real reasons are for one thing, which is usually bad for the leftist reconstruction of reality as they represent it now.

However Ezra Levant did get his manifesto and offers it for all to see here along with his own analysis.

And yeah it turns out like pretty much all of them, he was a leftist antisemite.

The second story in Montreal I have not seen anything about. What I am going to say here is from a first person account from a series of phone calls I got from someone I know well who was actually stuck in traffic at this exact location. The area is Westmount Montreal. This is an upper middle class area and very widely mixed demographics but yeah, a lot of Jewish people live there.

The account I have is from yesterday afternoon, a few hours after the incident downtown had resolved itself. There were apparently 130 police officers more or less. My contact saw several of them crouched or running around with guns drawn. There were 2 helicopters overhead and certain parts of the”the Blvd” had been closed off. Now this could be a kind of heightened hysteria reaction based on a report the police may have gotten about a suspicious incident or person. That would stand to reason given what happened before that day. But it’s still a major police reaction. I have no idea if this is reflected in the News yet. I am just writing based on a first hand account from the location yesterday at around 2 or 3:00 PM.

But the take away here that matters is the CBC is nothing but an Active Measure now. Watching or listening to CBC should only be done with the lens of knowing what the state demands we believe, and what the current and coming narrative attacks on reality are. And not for anything like information whatsoever.

Below, a short clip of Yuri Bezmenov explaining what Active Measures are during a now ironic interview on CBC in 1984 when they still trafficked in information and news.

2, This RAIR article offers a worthy look at the Potemkin replacement of Kier Starmer with whatever face the Fabian/Labour Party intends to carry on the revolution. Think of it this way: Obama becomes Biden. Trudeau becomes Carney. Different face but the actual agenda actually accelerates rather than changes course.

3. The Canadian state propaganda networks warn Canadians to lock their doors and use ineffective measures to protect themselves from groups of thugs and criminals the Canadian state brought in to terrorize legacy Canadians.

No description of the gangs is offered anywhere. Of course.

4. So no matter how you look at it, Canada is funding both sides of the war between Russia and its fraternal state, Ukraine. Canada has a strategic partnership with the PRC. We seem to have more than a free trade deal, in that stuff can be ordered from China and delivered to a home in Canada rapidly and with little to no duty or taxes.

So CANADIANS are funding the Russian side of the war via our purchases of nearly everything since it’s pretty much all made in China at this point, while we actually give money directly to Ukraine to fight against our money in Russia.

It almost seems like its that 1984 equation where the purpose of war is…

The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives,
but of the products of human labour. War is a way of shattering to pieces,
or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea,
materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable,
and hence, in the long run, too intelligent.

Even when weapons of war are
not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of
expending labour power without producing anything that can be consumed.

A Floating Fortress, for example, has locked up in it the labour that
would build several hundred cargo-ships. Ultimately it is scrapped as
obsolete, never having brought any material benefit to anybody, and with
further enormous labours another Floating Fortress is built.

In principle
the war effort is always so planned as to eat up any surplus that might
exist after meeting the bare needs of the population. In practice the needs
of the population are always underestimated, with the result that there is
a chronic shortage of half the necessities of life; but this is looked on
as an advantage.

It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups
somewhere near the brink of hardship, because a general state of scarcity
increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the
distinction between one group and another. By the standards of the early
twentieth century, even a member of the Inner Party lives an austere,
laborious kind of life. Nevertheless, the few luxuries that he does enjoy
his large, well-appointed flat, the better texture of his clothes, the
better quality of his food and drink and tobacco, his two or three
servants, his private motor-car or helicopter–set him in a different world
from a member of the Outer Party, and the members of the Outer Party have
a similar advantage in comparison with the submerged masses whom we call
‘the proles’.

The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the
possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and
poverty. And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and
therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste
seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival.

I don’t know much about economics. But in frequent conversations with those who do, it seems like every government policy leads to a prediction that looks like that in the future. And the fact that we are funding both sides of the Russia/Ukraine war, never seems to get even an honourable mention in State Media like the CBC or CTV or Global. Correct me please if I am wrong. In truth, we don’t listen to them much.

5. Palestinian Journalists

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Does anyone else think if you closed your eyes you could swear this was Christopher Hitchens?

1. Regina gets the minaret treatment

2. EU country ‘punishing’ the elderly with crazy meat restriction of just 2.8 ounces per day — because they ‘screwed up’ the climate

An eco-warrior politician has sparked outrage in Denmark after she defended guidelines limiting residents of government-run nursing homes to just 2.8 ounces of beef a week — which is less than one Big Mac.

Birgitte Kehler Holst of the left-wing green Danish party The Alternative was also accused of saying old people in nursing homes should be “punished” by restricting their meat intake in comments made in a meeting of Copenhagen’s City Council on April 30.

She was speaking against plans to exclude nursing home residents from guidelines in the Danish capital that restrict meals at government-run sites to just 2.8 ounces (80 grams) of beef, lamb, or veal per week.

“Everyone, including the elderly, must contribute to achieving our climate goals,” Holst said at the city council meeting, adding, “It is precisely the generation that has screwed up the most.”

3. An excellent example of dialectical naming. The new “Human Rights Museum” in Canada is planing an exhibit on the Genocide in Gaza. It is dialectical of course because they are negating a historical fact of the Nazi genocide of the Jews, with a complete fiction of the non-event of a genocide that somehow leaves the population larger each year it happens.

This makes it exactly like the Canadian Human Rights Courts and tribunals, which actually remove real rights from the individual, and give rights to often imaginary collectives. Which means of course the state. Like when Johnathan Yaniv sued a number of ethnic and conservative spas for refusing to wax his testicles because he claimed he was a woman, when he isn’t and the HRC found against the poor women that didn’t want to have to handle his man parts.

4. This may well be the most interesting movie of modern times. Picture your classic vigilante movie, but one that tells the truth about who is doing what to who, and where THE DIALOGUE IS TAKEN FROM ACTUAL COURTS AND JUDGES showing the lenience given to foreign rapists and murderers! Naturally Germany has flat out banned it. We suggest you get it now and watch it before it becomes aa crime to have even seen it.

Friends have told me that this movie is hidden on some sights under the name of other movies in order to avoid bans. So if you want to see it in Germany you have to look for film titles like “The Dark Knight” or something like that, I can’t exactly remember, in order to find it.

5. Sometimes people ask what cultural deracinating means.

Translation: In the United Kingdom, they have just approved the law on LEGALIZED INCEST, due to pressure from the Muslim lobby. Keir Starmer has just legalized marriages between cousins and siblings. A deputy confronted Starmer: – “This carries catastrophic risks to people’s health, many of which cannot be determined until the child’s birth. Mr. Starmer, do you understand what you’re doing?”, Starmer: – “Yes. I’ve already expressed my position, thank you. How much further does this infamous government plan to go?

Thank you all for checking out this site.

1. More proof of the use of dialectics to determine the results of the actions of agents of state, use of force, and the replacement of rule of law.

Not just that this article constantly refers to “a man” who was stalking children a Munster community centre. He has already been arrested and charges are pending. But there is no name, which might be lawful if there are no formal charges yet, but there is certainly no description or anything else that might help keep other kids safe while he awaits trial somewhere. But it seems OK to assume gender when it’s a man.

Or am I overthinking this one?

Man arrested after children approached near Munster Community Centre

Four kids under age 12 were approached by an unknown man driving a sport utility vehicle near the community centre on June 17.

The Ottawa Police Service says charges are pending against a man who was arrested following an investigation into “a suspicious incident involving children” near the Munster Community Centre.