Category Archives: Selective enforcement

The Government Media complex at full throttle

Posted on by

Europe News does it again. Check out this video on how Islam and Muslims are the true victims of Islamic terror against the non-Muslim. Somehow.

To get a sense of Europe News’ style sheet lets visit the video they did of the Pope’s visit to the Central African Republic or CAR.

Nope there is no agenda to spin or deceive or create a false narrative at Europe News at all. Nope. No way no how.

Add to this the BBC deliberate changing of the Munich killer’s name to void a clear Islamic connection.

At this stage we could launch into a proper rebuttal of all the things said in the top video and refute them and do so well and with solid references from Islamic scripture and sharia law. For instance the legal use of the word “Terror” as it is used in the Cairo declaration which makes it the official definition of terrorism for Muslims, which specifically excludes jihad. Which means that condemning terror by any muslim who uses the term in that way does not mean what it is intended to make us think that it means.

That kind of thing. And suddenly what is said with apparent sincerity sounds a lot different.

Instead perhaps at this late stage its best to quote Mar Steyn:

“We all know Islam is the religion of peace. Now its time for Muslims to do their part and stop killing everyone all over the place.”

H/T M.

An example of what is likely genuinely anti black racism in America

Posted on by

This is a video sent from Twitter last night:

The tweet was removed as I watched. But it was saved before it went down.

It is a significant example of genuine anti-black racism most likely however.

This women will almost certainly never be arrested, charged or convicted of any sort of hate crime for this public display of genocidal hatred of White people.

And the reason would be the racism of lowered expectations of black people. That and of course, the selective enforcement we see used against classical liberals and to the advantage of the far left and Muslims.

But still, one can’t help but feel that the fuel for this selective enforcement is the racism of lowered expectations. You cannot have equality before the law if you do not feel another group is capable of agency to the same degree.

One doesn’t charge a beagle for peeing on the lawn as one might any non-Clinton.

So for the sake of peaceful coexistence of black and white people, this woman should be charged and tried for a hate speech crime, if indeed those kinds of charges exist in that jurisdiction for anyone at all.

H/T Oz-Rita

(Best comment at LiveLeak: “Is that Loretta Lynch?”)

State-supported leftist mob harasses dentist because he is a member of the AfD

Posted on by

An original translation by Nash Montana

From this German News site:

For years, Dentist Dr. Marius Radtke?(64) has been treating patients in his praxis at the Pistoriusstraße in Weißensee.

Marius Radtke works as a volunteer in the function of spokesman for the Lichtenberg district association of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party. This has turned him into the target of left-wing groups who are determined to make his life difficult.

They dropped “warnings” into the mailboxes in the neighborhood, which were meant to inform patients that their dentist was a member of the “racist, un-social and hypocritical AfD party”.

Then they sent warnings to the other dental practices in the area and asked the “dear praxis teams” not to refer any more patients to Dr.?Radtke. In this manner they have tried to ruin the dentist economically since April 13. On their portal, ”antifascist Initiative”, the leftists celebrate themselves about this action, using the motto: “Pulling out Germany’s teeth!”

Demonstration in front of dentist praxis

Then, on Thursday, May 12, it happened: 60 black-clad people demonstrated in front of the dentist’s practice. The police secured the door behind which Dr.? Radtke worked with his dentist’s drill in hand, while they hurled insults at him from the street.

The march to the dentist’s office, which used the title “Weissensee ist bunt”, (Weissensee is colorful), was supported by three groups. One of the groups is the “Willkommensnetzwerk Pankow Hilft” (Welcome Network Pankow Helps). This network receives direct financial aid by the federal government, specifically the Ministry for Family.

“Pankow Hilft” is the recipient of plenty of praise and favorable mentions in public for their voluntary work with migrants and asylum seekers.

Now, the helpers have turned up at Pistoriusstrasse, however not to help, but to insult a dentist because he is a member of the AfD.

All this happened a week ago. [Ed: at the time of writing. It may be a few weeks ago now] The public wasn’t mentionably upset about it. And that may be the worst yet. Because if this becomes the norm, that people because of their political preferences can be harassed by an angry mob with the goal that said person then won’t be able to keep on practicing his livelihood, then Democracy has come to an end. Then we will enter very quickly into a new age of street fights.

Berlin city officials cloaked in silence

In April, the minister president of Thüringen, Bodo Ramelow (Left) had in clear language vehemently condemned the demonstration of left extremists in front of the residence of AfD leading figure Björn Höcke. Ramelow spoke of “nazi-tactics”.

It’s with this same kind of bluntness that the campaign against the Berlin dentist should have also been condemned. But the city leader cloaked himself in silence. As did other politicians, of whom not a word was heard from as well.

If one wishes to dispute Dr. Radtke, they should invite him to a discussion. But that is apparently not at all what these left marchers want. They want to finish a person, because they don’t like him.

The above post was translated by Nash a week or so ago and it got lost in the cracks. But there is an update now.

Please watch the video below:

How does a Cardinal become a Cuckoo?

Posted on by

This is a stunning display of Dhimmitude and moral equivalence. Frankly its like the X-files episode we wrote about a few months ago, except its the actual church that is doing it.

 

Remaking Rutland with Refugees

Posted on by

[Here is an article about a plan, kept secret from the people of the town, to relocate a lot of muslim migrants to the area. It was kept secret because the mayor already knew that the public would not want the fundamental transformation, to borrow a phrase, of the area that this plan means.]

By Sonia Bailley 

The character of the city of Rutland, Vermont is facing major change.  Nestled in the beautiful Green Mountains of Vermont, it is an unsuspecting city targeted for refugee resettlement.  After being kept in the dark since their mayor’s unilateral decision to accept 100 Syrian and Iraqi refugees in October, Rutland citizens should investigate the threatening impact that refugee resettlement has on their own public security, economic stability and community health before it’s too late.

Photo courtesy Green Mountain Power

The city of Rutland was chosen as the site to place refugees by the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI), one of the nine major federally-funded refugee resettlement contractors or voluntary agencies (volags), and its local affiliated field office or subcontractor, the Vermont Refugee Resettlement Program (VRRP). According to Ann Corcoran of Refugee Resettlement Watch, once a site is chosen for resettlement, the agency submits an annual resettlement plan to the State Department in order to receive federal funding of nearly $2,000 per refugee sponsored in addition to federal grants of up to $2,200 per refugee sponsored.  Refugee resettlement has become a billion dollar industry, according to investigative journalist James Simpson, a former economist and budget examiner for the White House Office of Management and Budget.

Please click over to American Thinker for the rest of the article. 

But check out this video on the same subject and on the same place on public TV.

In rational times, this should have led to a burning down of city hall.

Details here.

 

Judge Mocks Populace

Posted on by

An original translation by Nash Montana with much thanks

From German site: Direkt.Net

Dusseldorf. Just how arrogant individual german criminal judges have become, was revealed on Wednesday at the District Court. That is where an illegal asylum seeker, accused of groping, was given a judgment of probation, so that the judgment won’t serve to please the expectations of an angry mob.”

In the early morning hours of January 6th, as she was waiting for a train, a 15 year old girl was sexually molested by two men. “The suspect grabbed her and forced her to sit on his lap even though she tried to resist. He groped her private parts and he kissed her on the mouth against her will”, the internal police report writes. One of the participants was a young Syrian, the other one was from Iraq. A third Iraqi stood by and ridiculed the victim: “Person number 3 stood by and laughed,”, it says in the police report. A moroccan observed the situation and informed the police, which then freed the girl from her two tormentors.

The attack was supposed to be concealed

This attack, too, was supposed to be concealed from the public. It’s thanks to Die Welt, that the people of the state capital even heard about it, when the incident was reported four days after it happened. The police explained that the attack on the young girl was not reported by them for “reasons of protection for the victim”.

One of the suspects, the now 22 year old Iraqi Mohammed A., had to face juvenile court on Wednesday despite having reached legal age. Mohammed A. had confessed and admitted to have kissed the 15 year old against her will and having massively groped her. But since the Düsseldorf district court had passed increasingly mild and seemingly sympathetic judgments for offenders lately, which caused a bit of indignation in the population, a harsh judgment of the asylum seeker who entered Germany illegally, was not expected.

A “judgment that “won’t serve to please the expectations of an angry mob”

But what then came, was a new low point even for this court: The judge sentenced Mohammed A. to 20 months for sexual assault. But because this nation of law, after the New Year’s eve incidents “should not slide into a downward spiral, in which we let ourselves be harnessed in front of the wagons of certain political groups” and we should not “pass judgments that please the expectations of an angry mob”, the judge suspended the 20 months and passed probation instead. Under the requirement that the Iraqi even without a fixed residence will complete 150 hours of community service, the court was ready for the man’s immediate release.

It is only thanks to the prosecuting attorney that Mohammed A. was not immediately let go from custody. He doubted that the Iraqi would live a crime free life in the future in Germany and he spoke of the fact that Mohammed A. had lived and tried for Asylum in many different countries under many different names. In Sweden he was even granted legal residence, and yet “he still had nothing better to do than to commit a heinous act here”, once he crossed illegally into Germany.

The court granted a deadline to the prosecuting attorney to file for protest against the immediate release of the offender. But even so, this won’t change anything about the fact that the citizenry has already been ridiculed and mocked by being called “angry mob” by an impotent criminal justice system.

Another study in contrasts: Muslim arson against Jews, unknown arson against Muslims

Posted on by

Wed. May 11 2016. A Jewish deli, already burned down in an act of Arson by “Asians” was burned down again just as it was about to reopen after repairs and renovations.

Express UK:

Ta’am Grill and Bakery in Manchester was due to open just days after the attack – which one of the owners says could have been conducted by “a group of Asian boys”.

Amos Vaisman posted a video on social media showing two men breaking into his shop and dousing it in petrol.

The men then set fire to the building from the bathroom, with the flames spreading rapidly through the various rooms.

[…]

On a post attached to the video he wrote: “We have clear footage of the criminals involved and additional footage of them sending a group of Asian boys to go and buy petrol from the local garage.

(Video of the fire starting at site)

Now lets compare that to related items at the end of the same article:

FirefoxScreenSnapz142

So when a Muslim structure burns, its “Islamophobic” even though the facts are, a significant amount of the time this happens, it was Muslims who did it, either out of anger, from a competing sect, or to blame the indigenous people of the area in order to get government money to build a larger better newer facility.

When a specific Jewish business is burned not once but twice, its a gang of “Asians”.

Have the people of the Western world bred themselves into a state of suicidal docility?

A few minutes thought will lead us to where this will go, both obvious and less so.

Lets say you are an actuarial. A Jewish person asks for insurance, which is mandatory now of course, to open a deli or any other business that can be identified as Jewish. You check your charts and find that the risk of arson due to ‘crime’ is an order of magnitude higher than for a non-Jewish business. Now the cost of operating is more than one can earn.

Other people who share the same structure also may suddenly not want to allow a Jewish owned or identifiable business to open. They will perceive the risk as coming from the victim, as is the human norm in times of civilizational collapse, as it is recognized that the government cannot and will not act against those who are committing these acts, or as we treat it as a crime and punishment issue and not as a military one, which is what it is, then it doesn’t matter if they do catch the perps because it will make no difference in terms of the risk since there will always be more muslims ready to wage jihad. Again, because it wasn’t a crime per se, in the first place.

The net result will be a net win for the Muslims. They will achieve the first part of the goal, “First comes Saturday, then comes Sunday”. A reference to first, dealing with the Jews and then the Christians.

It is this author’s belief that this cannot change unless we change our view of what is taking place here. Until we understand that war is being waged on us all by Muslims, and that their tactic is to do so in a manner we do not understand, so that we cannot use the proper tools to fight back, we will lose.

There are less than 4 leaders and even potential leaders who appear to understand this, even by inference, in the world today.

The rest of us had better learn to think for ourselves.

One additional thought.

As the “Islamophobic” attack in the link took place in Corsica, it is much more likely that it was a targeted attack against this building because of its purpose. But the history behind it is not what the article indicated whatsoever. It was an illegal mosque operating by very radical jihadis who had really angered the locals many times and many ways. When it became clear that the authorities would not uphold the laws in Corsica, the people did what people should do. They enforced the laws themselves. The crime was the mosque. The response was enforcement. Just not by those who should have done it.

However what I wrote about arson against Islamic buildings in this article holds true for the UK and nearly everywhere else in the West.

Mosques that are attacked in the Islamic world are pretty much all due to Islamic rivalry, Sunni-Shiia conflicts and personal vendettas with the occasional revenge attack by Christians and Buddhists or Hindus where numbers allow and Muslims are heavily on the offensive to take that territory for Islam.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog

 

 

German treatment of Turkey and Poland. A study in contrasts

Posted on by

There has been quite a lot of attention and activity over Merkel’s supplication to Erdogan over some highly typical media criticism, and well deserved at that, of Turkish policies concerning both internal matters and matters that affect the safety, rights and freedoms of Europeans.

Most of the attention is over a fairly annoying and left leaning TV comic named Böhmermann, who wrote a poem mocking Erdogan’s sexuality, and suggesting he would prefer to share a straw bed with a sheep than a mattress with one of his lady friends.

His poem, which was scrubbed from the internet as much as possible, but managed to find its way on to The Rebel’s servers, was even read out loud the other day by a member of the German Parliament.

The Merkel-party MP did not read it as a show of solidarity with European freedom of speech, especially freedom to mock political authority, the sole purpose of that right along with mocking religious authority, but to show why Erdogan is right to be offended and why this comic should be jailed.

Now lets look at this same TV show that Böhmermann works for, doing a treatment of neighboring Poland:

An excerpt from some media on fashionable views of the Polish leadership.

A parade float in the city of Düsseldorf showing the leader of Poland’s ruling party as a dictator has caused shock in Warsaw. The depiction shows “contempt for Poland,” said the country’s foreign minister.

Rosenmontag in Düsseldorf

Germany’s famous Carnival Monday parades may be over on Tuesday, but the controversy many of them were courting was not. While several float makers remained under local police investigation for inciting racial hatred, one parade float from the city of Düsseldorf was causing an international outcry.

The creation in question depicts the leader of Poland’s ruling right-wing Law and Justice Party (PiS), Jaroslaw Kaczynski, as a dictator in military uniform with out booted foot on the head of a woman symbolizing his prostrate nation.

Some rather harsh depictions and illustrations of Poland. A nation that, well I think its safe to say, has some negative history with Germany in the not too distant past.

If one has even a quick look over these cases, there is at least the possibility that what we are seeing can be defined in one word.

Dhimmitude.

Thanks for the help Egri Nok.

 

 

 

What happens if you criticize the European Union with solid authoritative analysis?

Posted on by

Please read these two articles by Diana West on Vladimir Bukovski

#1 Silencing Bukovsky

#2  FLASH: British Court Imposes Gag Order on Bukovsky Libel Proceeding

What kinds of things does he say?

H/T Xanthippa, Diana West, Andrew Bostom.

Milo Yiannopoulos, Steven Crowder and Christina Hoff Sommers at UMass

Posted on by

Please forgive the hubris in this remark. But when people do not understand a set of behaviors, as Christine Hoff Sommers does not, or dismissed clear consistent  sets of policies as “Madness” (it is cancer though, as Milo stated) there is a missing piece of the motive for them. In my recent BlogTalk radio appearance I tried to explain the rash of cognitive dissonance amongst those who get it, but just don’t quite get it enough.

Tree root facts V4

 

German citizens place ad against Merkel in Swiss newspaper because German newspapers refused to print it

Posted on by

An original translation by Egri Nök with much thanks.

From the Berlin Journal

Berlin Journal
Bürger schalten Anzeige gegen Merkel in der Schweiz
Michael Müller –
26. April 2016

Citizens place advertisement against Merkel in Switzerland

Page 2 of the Neue Züricher Zeitung of Monday shows a ½ page advertisement with the title “Merkel still cheating on. How long will this continue?” The authors criticise Merkel sharply. The German chancellor is portrayed as a smiling hat player

[translator’s note: This type of play is illegal in Germany].

The advertisement in the Swiss daily cost more than 16,000 Swiss Franks

[16,000 USD/20,000 CAD].

But it is not aimed at a Swiss, but at a German audience. The NZZ is widely read in Germany too. The text of the ad obviously aims at German citizens:

Merkel cheats on!
For how long?
This is how the sham looks:

With the EU-Turkey-Treaty, Chancellor Merkel tries to convince us that she has got the mass immigration into Germany under control. But the facts show: the Turkey-Treaty is a sleight of hand.

1. For every illegal Syrian refugee, who is sent back from EU into Turkey, a recognized Syrian refugee can enter the EU and therefore Germany, as most EU-countries do not accept unlimited quantities of refugees. In other words: the illegal migration is rechristened into a legal migration – the mass immigration into Germany remains constantly high.

2. For this rechristening, EU citizens have to pay 20 million Euros per month!

3. As a “Thank you” for taking them back, Turkey pulled the EU over a barrel and achieved Visa freedom for Turkish citizens at the latest end of this year.

More than 74 million Turks can come to Germany without any Visa at all. The consequences? Bavarian Minister of Finance Söder warns of a Kurdish mass immigration, and the renowned Criminologist Christian Pfeiffer calls this Treaty a “monumental stupidity”, because the freedom of travel could start “a wave of illegal mass immigration”.

4. For this “monumental stupidity” the EU tax payers have to wire 6 billion Euro to Turkey until end 2018, to a country that tramples human rights, freedom of opinion, and freedom of the press under their feet.

Therefore we ask YOU to sign our appeal against the “Merkelian Welcome Culture” at www.rechtundfreiheit.de
[end of ad]

It is the Association for the Preservation of Law and Civil Liberty behind the advertisement. Why did this German group place their advertisement in a Swiss newspaper?

The media businessman Josef Konrad answers an enquiry by Blick:

“Except for the Hannoversche Zeitung, all large newspapers in Germany refused to print this ad.” The NZZ-ad has fully been funded by donations of the supporters. But they do not plan further ads in Swiss media.

About 3,500 people have already signed the ‘No’ to the “Merkelian Welcome Culture”. Now they hope to find more signatures through the NZZ advertisement “Merkel cheats on!”.

The name of those behind the association still remain a mystery. Media businessman Josef Konrad says, his cooperation with the association was only temporary, and he has no connections to the association.

“The founders and members of the association currently do not wish to appear in public or to be named”, says Josef Konrad, who is a member of the AfD Bavaria. It is a “loose association of concerned citizens from Germany”.

Marine Le Pen turns around a CBC ambush

Posted on by

Thank you Oz-Rita for the hard work on this important translation.

The definition of bullying might be a state broadcaster that uses over a billion dollars in revenue they take from the public by force and then use it to push their own ideas on that same public, even though the mandate is to inform and connect the public.

In this ambush of French presidential candidate Marine le Pen, the interviewer managed to turn it around well enough that the station sort of hid it on their website rather than advertise it. Its worth the watch. Its nearly a template as to how people who are not cultural Marxists, AKA “Far right wing extremists” have to handle pretty much any legacy media contact they may have.