Muslim cleric issues reward for anyone who kills Christian woman for insulting Islam

From The Telegraph U.K.

Pakistani cleric puts bounty on Christian woman’s head

A hardline, pro-Taliban Pakistani Muslim cleric on Friday offered a reward for anyone who kills a Christian woman sentenced to death by a court on charges of insulting Islam.

Christian woman sentenced to death in Pakistan 'for blasphemy'
Asia Bibi has been sentenced to death ‘for blasphemy’ 
4:03PM GMT 03 Dec 2010

The sentence against Asia Bibi has renewed debate about Pakistan’s blasphemy law which critics say is used to persecute religious minorities, fan religious extremism and settle personal scores. Non-Muslim minorities account for roughly 4 per cent of Pakistan’s 170 million population.

Maulana Yousef Qureshi, the imam of a major mosque in the northwestern city of Peshawar, offered a £3,700 reward and warned the government against any move to abolish or change the blasphemy law.

“We will strongly resist any attempt to repeal laws which provide protection to the sanctity of Holy Prophet Mohammad,” Qureshi told a rally of hardline Islamists.”Any one who kills Asia will be given 500,000 rupees in reward from Masjid Mohabat Khan,” he said referring to his mosque.

While Qureshi is not believed to have a wide following, comments by clerics can provoke a violent response and complicate government efforts to combat religious extremism and militancy.

Qureshi, a cleric who has been leading congregation at the 17th century Mohabat Khan mosque for decades, later told Reuters he was determined to see her killed.

“We expect her to be hanged and if she is not hanged then we will ask mujahideen and Taliban to kill her.”

Ms Bibi, a 45-year-old mother of four, is the first woman to be sentenced to death under the blasphemy law.

Blasphemy convictions are common in mainly Muslim Pakistan. Although the death sentence has never been carried out as most convictions are thrown out on appeal, angry mobs and fanatics have killed many people accused of blasphemy in the past.

In 2006, Qureshi and his followers announced rewards amounting to over $1 million for anyone who killed Danish cartoonists who drew caricatures of the Prophet Mohammad that had enraged Muslims worldwide.

After her conviction, Ms Bibi appealed to President Asif Ali Zardari to pardon her, saying she had been wrongly accused by neighbours due to a personal dispute.

Last week, a government minister said an initial inquiry into the case showed she had not committed blasphemy. The Lahore High Court last month prevented Mr Zardari from granting a pardon and ruled that the High Court should be allowed to decide her appeal.

“No president, no parliament and no government has any right to interfere in the commandants of Islam. Islamic punishment will be implemented at all costs,” said Qureshi.

David Yerushalmi: Fighting Sharia through law

Here is an interview with David Yerushlami from the web site,

New English Review.

I would like to mention that I had the opportunity to hear Mr. Yerushlami speak at a symposium in Washington a couple of years ago and he was extraordinary. In a symposium filled with excellent speakers, some of whom I interviewed on Camera such as Lord Malcolm Pearson and many many others, David stood out even among them. There was a clear and unafraid lucidity about him. He was able to make the most complex issue comprehensible to all of us at least for those minutes he was speaking. Mr. Yerushlami is the man who managed to defeat the Dade County bus service when they refused the adds which allowed apostates of Islam a place to call if they wanted advice and defeated the New York City Bus Co. when they also refused adds for a similar reason. When David Y. Speaks, it is wise to listen carefully.

Eeyore for Vlad.

Fighting Shariah Through the Law: An Interview with David Yerushalmi, Esq.

by Jerry Gordon (December 2010)

Shariah, Islamic law, has become increasingly visible in the debates concerning possible Islamization in the West. It is at the core of opposition to and debate about expansion of mosques in this country. Shariah is a total system that governs every aspect of the life of a Muslim including fulfillment of jihad against non-believers, whether through da’wa, persuasion, or ultimately violence. Shariah is a political, legal, social and military system that threatens basic constitutional liberties and freedoms that we take for granted in America. The lure of multi-billion dollar transactions has created Shariah-compliant international corporate finance markets with active participation by major commercial and investment banks and financial rating organizations. Shariah advisers to these eager financial institutions are proponents of violent jihad and Islamic antisemitism. One egregious example is Pakistani Federal Sharia Court Judge and Hanafi Scholar, Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani, who advised Dow Jones on creation of its Islamic Market Index. Egyptian-born Islamic scholar, Yusuf Qaradawi used the term ‘financial jihad” to describe  Sharia-compliant finance (SCF).  As Andrew McCarthy noted in a National Review article, “American Taxpayer, Financial Jihadist”, what Qaradawi meant.

Because sharia bars interest (although it permits “profits” that Islamic authorities, in their infinite wisdom, deem reasonable), SCF requires that investments be constantly monitored and that any interest payments be purged. This is done by skimming off a percentage that is then channeled — at the direction of the advisory board — to an Islamic “charity”. Of course, as no one knows better than the Treasury Department, many such charities are merely fronts for the financing of terrorist organizations. This is not an accident. When Sheikh Qaradawi speaks of “financial jihad” as an Islamic obligation, he’s not kidding: In Islamist ideology, funding those who “fight in Allah’s cause” — e.g., Hamas — is one of the eight categories of permissible zakat, the Muslim obligation of almsgiving.
Shariah has entered our legal system through the backdoor of arbitration and mediation panels and even our court system.
One of the prominent opponents of Shariah in our legal system is David Yerushalmi, Esq., a New York and D.C.-based lawyer, litigator and developer of uniform laws aimed at curtailing and outlawing its spread. Yerushalmi designed and sponsored the Mapping Sharia Project whose findings revealed the extent of extremist Sharia compliance in a study of American mosques, soon to be published in a peer review professional journal. He has initiated ground breaking legal actions involving Sharia issues, advancing important federal cases, and has won cases in matters of free speech under the First Amendment. Among these are:
·        Murray v Paulson brought in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of Michigan against the Treasury for using TARP monies in the bail out of insurance giant AIG which markets and sells takaful Shariah compliant insurance products. The case has advanced given the denial by the court of the federal government’s motion to dismiss. The court is now considering plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment asking the court to rule that the U.S. government willfully promoted Shariah in its drive to support AIG’s Shariah business.
·        A federal case brought by five former Muslim clients of the Council of American Islamic relations in the DC Federal District for fraud and racketeering in misrepresenting legal representation. The RICO charges were dismissed by the Court. However, the fraud charges have been upheld in a recent decision. Continue Reading →

Ok what about Thor? Or Peter Pan? What is f*cking wrong with the British?

Here is the most infuriating thing I have seen today and the most solid evidence of the sharia being imposed on the general British public. Really guys it’s time for a real armed revolt over there. At what point do you say the rule of law, as British people have created, fought killed and died for it, no longer is working in your interest or indeed is recognizable as British law at all? Clearly you could say anything you want publicly about Jesus, Thor, Aphrodite, Hercules? Could you say something negative about Peter Pan or Papa Smurf? I guarantee you that you can. It is Islamic symbols and only Islamic symbols that get you in trouble with the law.

I guess the only redeeming thing, is he is not being stoned to death at the tower of London.

Yet.

From:

This is Leicestershire:

Anti-Allah outburst earns EDL supporter £200 fine after protest in Leicester

The trial was held at Leicester Magistrates' Court

The trial was held at Leicester Magistrates’ Court

By terry hall

A man has been fined for making offensive comments about Allah during the English Defence League protest in Leicester.

Lee Whitby was found guilty of using racially aggravated abusive words during the protest in the city centre on Saturday, October 9.

During a trial at Leicester Magistrates’ Court yesterday, the 27-year-old pleaded not guilty to chanting “threatening, abusive or insulting” words that were likely to cause “harassment, alarm or distress.”

Although he admitted making comments, Whitby said he did not believe they would have been heard by anyone other than police officers or fellow EDL supporters.

However, magistrate Rick Moore ruled that officers were likely to have been alarmed by the defendant’s words.

Whitby, of Holley Place, Stoke-on-Trent, said he was an EDL supporter and had travelled by train to Leicester on the day of the protest with about 30 people from Stoke and Crewe.

He also admitted being part of previous EDL protests in Newcastle, Dudley, Stoke, Bolton and Bradford.

The defendant told the court he was leaving the protest site in Humberstone Gate East and was being ushered towards the train station when he uttered the offensive chant.

Whitby, who chose to represent himself, said: “I went to an EDL demo and was in an area which was isolated away from everyone else.

“The only people that would have heard were the EDL.

“I was not aiming it at anyone. No-one around would find it offensive. Otherwise, I wouldn’t have said it.

“I was just voicing my opinion at an EDL meeting with just EDL people around.”

Alexandra Blossom, prosecuting, said the comments made were bound to cause harassment, alarm or distress because of Leicester’s multicultural society and the fact the words were said in the city centre.

She said: “A number of people present that day were likely to be offended. Continue Reading →

Man jailed for 25 years for touching a koran with unwashed hands.

And these people have nuclear weapons. Pakistan has to be the most disgusting place on earth after North Korea.

From Pakistani Christian Post:

Lahore: November 25, 2010. A court in Pakistan has freed a Christian man who was wrongly jailed for 25 years for blasphemy after he allegedly defiled the Koran, the Muslim holy book, by touching it with unwashed hands.

Munir Masih, had consistently denied the allegations against him, arguing that they were false and made maliciously by a Muslim neighbour whose child had been involved in a quarrel with his 10-year-old son.

He has been freed on bail but his wife, Ruqqiya Bibbi,who was also given a 25-year sentence for the offence, is still in jail awaiting the outcome of her application for bail.

They are both appealing against sentence and conviction after Muhammad Nawaz, the man who accused them, admitted they were innocent and indicated that was willing to submit an affidavit to confirm this. Continue Reading →

March in England Dec 15th against legal double standards.

I am so glad, the EDL is doing this. It is an abomination and an outrage that two standards and legal systems apply to the people of England and the fact is, when you add those systems together, you get Sharia for all.

This march, perhaps of all the marches the EDL have organized, is at least in my opinion the most important and moral one. In any given jurisdiction, there only ever can be one standard and set of laws. Anything else is slavery. If you can at all make it to join this march on Dec. 15th please do so. This is a crucial issue.

Stoning 101; the anatomy of barbarism.

From The National Post

November 20, 2010 – 10:11 am

Graphic: Anatomy of a stoning

In Saturday’s National Post we look at the brutal practice of stoning. This method of execution is still practiced in certain countries, notably Iran, where it is used to punish adulterers and other criminals. The graphic below looks at how a stoning occurs (click on graphic for a full-size version):

Part one

Adam McDowell, Asmahan Giarrit, Jonathon Rivait, Richard Johnson/National Post

Part two

Adam McDowell, Asmahan Giarrib, Jonathon Rivait, Richard Johnson/National Post

BBC: Panorama expose on Muslim schools in the UK

These are not government funded schools, so the Brits will have a rough time with this one. Dozens of Muslim schools in the UK teaching blatant hatred of Jewish people as well as how to amputate limbs of thieves sharia style.

British pupils taught Sharia way to cut off a thief’s hand

From The Daily Mail. Check out the third paragraph down. Apparently this will all be out in a documentary within 24 hours or so. Article is unaltered except I bolded a sentence or two.

Eeyore

By James Slack

Last updated at 12:01 AM on 22nd November 2010
Children are being taught about Sharia law - which is derived from the Koran - in weekend schools Children are being taught about Sharia law – which is derived from the Koran – in weekend schools

Children in Britain are being taught brutal Sharia law punishments, including how to hack off a criminal’s hand or foot.

So-called ‘weekend schools’ – which offer the hardline Saudi National Curriculum to Muslim children in the UK – also teach that the penalty for gay sex is execution and that ‘Zionists’ are plotting to take over the world for the Jews.

One set text book challenges youngsters to list the ‘reprehensible’ qualities of the Jews.

Another for six year-olds asks them to answer what happens to someone who dies who is not a believer in Islam. The answer being looked for is ‘hellfire’.

A BBC Panorama investigation, to be screened tonight, identified a network of more than 40 weekend schools teaching around 5,000 children, from age six to 18.

The schools are run under the umbrella of ‘Saudi Students Clubs and Schools in the UK and Ireland’. Continue Reading →

Calgary: Muslim beats sister with belt for flirting. Avoids criminal record. Imam applies taqiyya.

From The Calgary Herald

Calgary teen belted his sister for flirting

By Daryl Slade, Calgary Herald November 19, 2010

A Calgary teen will avoid a criminal record after beating his younger sister with a belt for flirting with boys at school.

Court heard a relative had told him it was his duty to punish her under Islamic culture, but a local imam says that’s not part of the religion’s teachings.

In a judgment released on Thursday, youth court Judge Lillian McLellan granted a conditional discharge to the offender, who pleaded guilty to assault with a weapon and says he wants to become a police officer.

Defence lawyer Jim Conway said there was definitely a cultural aspect to the case.

He said the sister, then 16, was doing something improper and a relative told the brother he had a duty to discipline her as the oldest male in the family.

Conway said the girl reported the assault to her school counsellor and her brother, then 17, was charged.

Syed Soharwardy, lead imam at Almadinah Calgary Islamic Centre, told the Herald it was wrong for the boy to assault his sister, but blamed parents and the community for not properly educating young people.

“The boy should not have done it. There is no such thing in Islam that a brother, sister, father or mother should hit someone with a belt, bat or stick,” Soharwardy said on Thursday.

“A girl flirting with someone is not seen as good in Islam. Both of them made a mistake, but I blame the boy more when he went ahead and hit his sister. He should have gone to his parents, community leaders or counsellors. I blame the whole community for not teaching them the right things.”

Court heard that the teen, who cannot be named under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, became angry over rumours about his sister and entered her bedroom on Sept. 27, 2008. He grabbed her by the shoulders and threw her to the ground. He then followed her to the kitchen, removed his belt and struck her seven to eight times on the right arm and leg.

If he complies with all conditions, the charge will be withdrawn and the teen will avoid a criminal conviction.

ds****@***********ld.com

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald
From Grace:
It’s important to note that the imam quoted in this article is none other than Syed Sohawardy of the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada, the same imam who aggressively argued that sharia law be implemented in Canada. He was also one of the chief complainants against Ezra Levant, who found great offense in his decision to reprint the Danish cartoons in the now defunct Western Standard. You can see his barely legible, scribbled application of complaint here.
Here is Sohawardy’s article defending sharia as he tries to counter oft ‘misunderstandings’ of it’s inherent beauty. The attempt here is an obvious one; to deny the truth of sharia’s twisted, illiberal principles and to convey it as a system of gender equality, tolerance of other religions, sincerity, honesty, piety and purity- a blessing for any society. The imam does though acknowledge some ‘ills’ within Muslim nations by stating yet again another remarkable defense of sharia:
“The current chaos in Muslim countries is not because of sharia. It is because of an absence of sharia’.
I am baffled as to why responses are sought from Muslim leaders whose group efforts seek to implement sharia within Canadian society, who constantly defend it, lie for it and apologize for it. Why anyone would ring up these people for comment is beyond me. I am even more disturbed that this young woman-hater will not receive a criminal record for his crime and the relatives who guided him were not subsequently charged with criminal complicity in their role of aiding and abetting him. Those who practice the art of taqiyya, another golden sharia principle, will no doubt pass this off too, as just one more  ‘misquote’ or ‘misunderstanding’. Here is one of many found in the Qur’an relating to the pre-approved, pious sanctioning of women/wife abuse:

The Qur’an:
Qur’an (4:34)“Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.”

Oh, and one other thing- the young lad who dutifully, honestly, sincerely and piously obeyed Islam’s sharia by assaulting his sister with his belt wants to become……. a police officer.

Quran quote courtesy of The Religion of Peace, Got Quran?

Relatives assault male doctor

From Gates of Vienna:

In one of those scenes that are becoming all too common in today’s Europe, a family of culture enrichers in Sweden attacked an emergency room doctor to prevent him from touching one of their women, even if it meant risking the patient’s life.

Our Danish correspondent Hans Erling Jensen has translated an article about the incident from Dagens Medicin (Today’s Medicine). He has added a bit of editorial embellishment, and follows the translation with his own commentary:

The doctor rushed to help a woman who went into violent hemorrhage after childbirth. But when the woman’s relatives discovered that the doctor was a man, they immediately went on the attack.

This incident took place at Örebro University Hospital in Sweden two weeks ago. According to René Bangshöj, head of the women’s clinic, the assaulted doctor had been called in to help a woman who had just given birth and who then underwent heavy bleeding.

“When the doctor came in, he was met by angry screaming: ‘We do not want a male doctor at the childbirth room’,” Bangshöj said to Swedish Radio in Örebro.

The doctor, however, took his medical vow seriously, and went towards the woman. That made her husband go berserk, and he violently attacked the doctor to stop him from touching his bleeding wife.

“And at the same time the woman’s brother came into the room and attacked the doctor from behind,” Bangshöj told the reporter. “The doctor tried to protect himself against the punches and kicks, but the two foreigners nevertheless gave him a sharp kick in the groin,” he said to Swedish Radio.

Several staff members had already alerted the police, who came in large numbers and had the two violent men quickly removed. Then the woman finally could be taken to the surgery room, and she was saved in spite of it all. [The question is now whether she jumped out of the frying pan and into the fire, now that a male doctor had touched her! — HEJ]

The doctor is now working as before on the ward, but the hospital has its security department working on the matter to determine if there exist continued threats against him after doing surgery to save one of those unfortunate women who have to give birth in a culture completely without decency.

According to the head of staff, Rene Bangshöj, it is not uncommon for patients’ male relatives to make demands on the department’s staff, advising them that women must be inspected by female doctors and not men. “We see it as discrimination against male doctors, if we should always have to be prepared to consider these kinds of wishes,” the doctor concludes his statement.

Hans Erling Jensen adds: Continue Reading →

CHRISTIAN WOMAN APPEALS HER DEATH SENTENCE FOR BLASPHEMY

It’s irrelevant whether the woman blasphemed or not, such a ruling is contemptible, and should be held against the state of Pakistan and Islam in general, and sadly folks, this kind of thing goes on throughout the ME and we never hear bout them, because their “taken care of” in little backward villages where the sunlight never shines. KGS

H/T TROP

The family of a Pakistani Christian woman sentenced to death for blasphemy is appealing the verdict with the Lahore High Court. Asia Bibi, a mother of two and field hand, was sentenced to death for allegedly making slanderous remarks about the Prophet Muhammad.

Blasphemy is a capital offense under Pakistani law. Bibi is the first Christian woman in Pakistan to be sentenced to death for blasphemy. Yet her guilt is questionable.

One report claims Bibi’s neighbors objected to an infidel touching the communal water bowl and approached a cleric, claiming she had insulted the Prophet.

Another report claims some of the women workers had reportedly been pressuring Bibi to renounce her Christian faith and accept Islam. During the discussion, Bibi responded by speaking of how Jesus had died on the cross for the sins of mankind and asking the Muslim women what Muhammad had done for them.

The Muslim women took offence and began to beat Bibi and she was locked in a room by some men. A mob reportedly formed and “violently abused” her and her children.

MORE HERE:

Islamists want to create a parallel society in Canada

From The National Post

Islamist groups seek ‘parallel society’ in Canada: report

“At a minimum, the existence of such mini-societies undermines resilience and the fostering of a cohesive Canadian nation,” a new Candian intelligence report on Islamic “parallel societies” says.

Stewart Bell, National Post · Saturday, Nov. 13, 2010

TORONTO — A newly released intelligence report says hardline Islamist groups want to build a “parallel society” in Canada, which could undermine the country’s social cohesion and foster violence.

The de-classified Intelligence Assessment obtained by the National Post says extremists have been encouraging Muslims in the West to reject Western society and to live in “self-imposed isolation.” The report focuses on groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and Hizb-ut-Tahrir, which do not advocate terrorist violence but promote an ideology at odds with core Western values.

“Even if the use of violence is not outwardly expressed, the creation of isolated communities can spawn groups that are exclusivist and potentially open to messages in which violence is advocated,” it says. “At a minimum, the existence of such mini-societies undermines resilience and the fostering of a cohesive Canadian nation.”

The report was written by the Integrated Threat Assessment Centre, which monitors threats to Canada’s national security and is composed of representatives of CSIS, the RCMP, Foreign Affairs, National Defence and other agencies.

It was circulated internally last year after Hizb-ut-Tahrir invited Muslims to a conference in Mississauga, Ont., to discuss the establishment of an Islamic caliphate. A copy of the document was recently released under the Access to Information Act.

“While the issue of violence by Islamist groups has continued to be a counter-terrorism priority for Western governments and particularly security services for many years, Islamist social ideology appears to have gone unstudied, precisely because the use of violence is either unsupported or understated,” it says. “Nevertheless, several Islamist movements advocate a rejection of Western society and mores, and encourage self-imposed isolation of Muslims in the West.”

It says Islamists believe that Islam should govern all aspects of society and that Sharia law and state law should be “synchronized.” Extremists forced to flee Muslim-majority countries such as Egypt now preach these beliefs in the West, it says, adding, “By definition, their world views clash with secular ones. A competition for the hearts and minds of the diaspora Muslims has hence begun.”

“Some Islamists advocate isolationism and the establishment of a parallel society,” it says. “Isolationism can lead to conditions where extreme messages can incubate and eventually become the catalyst for violence. At a minimum, isolationism undermines a multicultural and democratic society.”

The report notes that Mennonites and Doukhobors have also sought to isolate themselves form the mainstream. “Why then, should Canadians be worried about Islamist extremists who reject democracy or isolate themselves from non-Muslims?” it asks.

But activist Tarek Fatah said there is a difference. “You can talk about the Mennonites but the Mennonites’ aim in life is not to destroy Western civilization, it is seclusion.”

sb***@**********st.com

John Robson speaks on the charges facing Elisabeth Wolff

Ottawa Canada journalist John Robson speaks on the charges facing Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff and more and more people today. John Robson is Managing Editor at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, a columnist with the Ottawa Citizen, a broadcaster with News Talk Radio 580 CFRA in Ottawa and an Invited Professor at the University of Ottawa. He holds a Ph.D in American history from the University of Texas at Austin.

Filmed at The Free Thinking Film Festival, Ottawa Canada, Nov 14 2010 with thanks to John Robson and Fred Litwin

Shining A Light On Shariah Creep

Investors.com:

Posted 11/10/2010 07:14 PM ET

Islamofascism: The Council on American-Islamic Relations may wish it never sued to overturn an Oklahoma ban on Shariah law. Now the entire nation will get to see it and other Islamists’ true anti-American colors.

CAIR is thumping its chest over persuading a Clinton-appointed federal judge to temporarily block Oklahoma from enacting a state constitutional amendment that prohibits state courts from considering Islamic law when deciding cases. Fully 70% of Oklahoma voters passed the landmark measure.

But CAIR has ignited a legal firestorm that will likely rage all the way to the Supreme Court. Thanks to CAIR’s latest bit of lawfare, Americans will get to hear a long overdue debate not just about the constitutionality of such bans on Shariah law but about the constitutionality of Shariah law itself.

This is not a debate CAIR wants to have, since it ultimately will have to defend the indefensible. It claims in a press release that Shariah law is “a dynamic legal framework” derived from Islamic scripture “and analytical reasoning.”

In fact, there’s nothing reasoned about it. It’s a medieval legal code that administers cruel and unusual punishments such as stonings, amputations and honor killings. Think the Taliban.

Shariah can be seen in action this week with Pakistan’s death sentence on a Christian woman for blasphemy. Between 1986 and 2009, at least 974 people have been charged for defiling the Quran or insulting the Muslim Prophet Muhammad.

For the rest please click over to investors.com