Islamists want to create a parallel society in Canada

From The National Post

Islamist groups seek ‘parallel society’ in Canada: report

“At a minimum, the existence of such mini-societies undermines resilience and the fostering of a cohesive Canadian nation,” a new Candian intelligence report on Islamic “parallel societies” says.

Stewart Bell, National Post · Saturday, Nov. 13, 2010

TORONTO — A newly released intelligence report says hardline Islamist groups want to build a “parallel society” in Canada, which could undermine the country’s social cohesion and foster violence.

The de-classified Intelligence Assessment obtained by the National Post says extremists have been encouraging Muslims in the West to reject Western society and to live in “self-imposed isolation.” The report focuses on groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and Hizb-ut-Tahrir, which do not advocate terrorist violence but promote an ideology at odds with core Western values.

“Even if the use of violence is not outwardly expressed, the creation of isolated communities can spawn groups that are exclusivist and potentially open to messages in which violence is advocated,” it says. “At a minimum, the existence of such mini-societies undermines resilience and the fostering of a cohesive Canadian nation.”

The report was written by the Integrated Threat Assessment Centre, which monitors threats to Canada’s national security and is composed of representatives of CSIS, the RCMP, Foreign Affairs, National Defence and other agencies.

It was circulated internally last year after Hizb-ut-Tahrir invited Muslims to a conference in Mississauga, Ont., to discuss the establishment of an Islamic caliphate. A copy of the document was recently released under the Access to Information Act.

“While the issue of violence by Islamist groups has continued to be a counter-terrorism priority for Western governments and particularly security services for many years, Islamist social ideology appears to have gone unstudied, precisely because the use of violence is either unsupported or understated,” it says. “Nevertheless, several Islamist movements advocate a rejection of Western society and mores, and encourage self-imposed isolation of Muslims in the West.”

It says Islamists believe that Islam should govern all aspects of society and that Sharia law and state law should be “synchronized.” Extremists forced to flee Muslim-majority countries such as Egypt now preach these beliefs in the West, it says, adding, “By definition, their world views clash with secular ones. A competition for the hearts and minds of the diaspora Muslims has hence begun.”

“Some Islamists advocate isolationism and the establishment of a parallel society,” it says. “Isolationism can lead to conditions where extreme messages can incubate and eventually become the catalyst for violence. At a minimum, isolationism undermines a multicultural and democratic society.”

The report notes that Mennonites and Doukhobors have also sought to isolate themselves form the mainstream. “Why then, should Canadians be worried about Islamist extremists who reject democracy or isolate themselves from non-Muslims?” it asks.

But activist Tarek Fatah said there is a difference. “You can talk about the Mennonites but the Mennonites’ aim in life is not to destroy Western civilization, it is seclusion.”

10 Replies to “Islamists want to create a parallel society in Canada”

  1. This is exactly the silent or stealth Jihad that we have been warned of, and ignored especially by our government officials and the Liberal, Leftist MSM. There is a gigantic fifth column of like minded Muslims sitting on the fence playing along with us, however hoping that the Islamist/Islamofascist movement is successful.

  2. If this is allowed to happen in any Western nation we can then say welcome to the new Balkans, there will be raid and counter raid, atrocities and counter atrocities for Centuries. Anyone who thinks the Moslems are going to stop or that their is a peaceful solution to this mess is on some kind of drug.

  3. One step at a time.

    In wartime, it is generally best if you are the attacker. Seeing that the U.S. is now on the strategic defensive, we can expect this type of pressure to continue to increase.

  4. I don’t know how many of you know about the classic terror to guerrilla war to conventional war plan of the far left but what they are doing in the West and in Africa is late stage 1 verging on stage 2. Stage 1 is carrying out terror attacks forcing the governments under attack to turn oppressive. Stage 2 is then retreating out of the cities to the country and becoming a classic guerrilla force at the same time building a sanctuary. Stage 3 is to recruit and train enough people to take to the field in a conventional war.

    The above is a gross over simplification but it does give you some idea of what they are doing. the Sanctuary they are seeking to build is the most important thing at the moment.

    The answer is to keep pushing them until they have no sanctuary, not even in their minds. Given the current leadership in the West it will be a while before we start fighting back the way we should.

  5. The people have started to fight back. That is a big plus. No matter how much propaganda the BBC and CNN put out about Islam, no matter how many times Obama praises Islam, the fact is the man in the street is a whole different ball game. He is is not buying. The Journalists, and poloticians speak to each other and then speak to their favourite people the muslims, but,” garbage!” says the man in the street. He know too much and has enough common sense to realise when someone is lying to him. If it were otherwise then entire western countries would be converting to Islam starting with the man in the street. It has not happened despite the billions of dollars and smiles and terrorism paid for by the Saudis. The converts are the usual suspects: some low esteem women searching for a husband, angry black males in the prison system, and the occasional white male who is Nazi or Communist who recognises a fellow a totalitarian system when he sees one. The other catagorie is the drifter, usually a white male though not always, who drifts into islam and then out of Islam a few years later as he has found another religion. Even children who have been heavily indocrinated are not buying. I know a young man of 17 years of age who told me some interesting facts. He went to a school which was among the worst schools in the country. It was about 95% muslim. He was preached at on a regular basis, and even went to prayer time with the muslims once but he never bought the bullshit. He is out of there now and is getting ready for University but if kids are not buying then the adults, except for the usual suspects, are definately are not buying. I have also spoken to other even younger children and they do the same thing: they are not buying. In fact because kids do not give a toss about political correctness they have natural common sense and also the young lack of respect for things. They look upon Islam as a big joke. Quite a few know about the Mohammad peadophile thing. Facts like that are a goldmine to kids and they endlessly tease the muslim kids with them.

  6. Since the man in the street is not buying then that leaves Jihad. The muslims are getting more and more unsure of themselves. Nothing works. Jihad has failed also. So it is entirely possible that the present state of affairs may be the way things will be from now on. However, I am bound to be told off for being so naive. Well hope springs eternal and who know if Holland leads the way then a real muslim retreat(!) may become a reality in some countries at least.

  7. If we hold firm and fight we will win, there is no doubt about that, the question is what will our countries be like after the war? We are heading into a major war that will last decades, yes there will be pauses to catch our breaths that will be called peace but the various wars will all be part of the same war. The strength of the West is the disciplined soldiers, the strength of the Moslems is the warrior, in any type of long fight the soldiers will defeat the warriors. And if the soldiers happen to be warriors also so much the better. The weakness of the Moslems in working together is according to the Berets I have talked to that served over there, is something in their culture that prevents them from developing strong honest leadership. Without the honesty of the leadership as a given the discipline must be enforced by brutal means and that often but not always destroys unit integrity. The only exceptions that I am aware of was the British Army during the early colonial period, and the French Foreign Legion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *