Category Archives: Leftism and Islam

Jewish owned Bookstores across Canada targeted for harassment, disruption and psychological torture

Posted on by

https://x.com/truckdriverpleb/status/1872395605282344996

The typical line would be to point out that this is not Israel, this isn’t even a Jewish institution, which would be arguably an abstraction for Israel since, well since Israel is the home of the Jewish people. This is just a chain of stores owned by Jewish people. And these events are part of a colour revolution to take down the West, just like the BLM riots were, based on an impossible narrative about George Floyd.

First, a look at some videos from Indigo Bookstores:

December 26 2024: Montreal

People shopping at Indigo being harassed with a Maoist narrative attack.

This just says Ontario.

Brian Lilley the Journalist posted this yesterday from Toronto, but it looks similar to the video that Dalia posted saying it was from last year. Either way, for the point we are making here, it is the same.

Indigo Toronto:

Montreal again

If anyone has ever had a job as a teen or young adult in a mall, ask yourselves what kind of behaviour would get you kicked out, banned or arrested from the entire premises. The fact is, each one of the people in all these protests far exceeds the requirements for legal action. This is private property. Also the tactics caused enough stress to store employees that they had to shut down for a while. Which makes a great learning point when you add the recent James Lindsay video on Safe Spaces. He explains the actual tactic behind making students believe that non-leftist political changes are traumas that require special treatment. If you haven’t seen his short video on this, consider watching it. In this context, we see how real trauma is dismissed as nothing and nothing is real trauma. This is intentional. This is, don’t make me say it….Starts with a D. Although I would accept “Diabolical” as well.

These demonstrations are lines of action. They serve a purpose, and one which goes way beyond antisemitism or Israel. This is about destroying our entire system, and the further erosion of rule of law. The general public already knows if they fight back even moderately it will likely be those individuals facing a judge and it won’t be a cheap trial, even if they win. Just ask any of the Convoy people charged with Mischief. Or mark Steyn who took on a Climate fraud with his BS little hockey stick graph. Itself a line of action in the Climate line of operation.

And this is related. And of course, any chance to repost a good Coughlin video is always taken.

Outstanding speech by VOX MP in Spain, detailing the dialectical language of the enemy in the West

Posted on by

This is probably the best speech of its kind we have seen. The write up of who she is can be seen at RAIR.

The question now becomes, will this, like the hundred other speeches we have seen by the reality minded, make any difference whatsoever?

Certainly knowing the truth and having it in the open is prerequisite. But having agency and ability and tools to act is another matter.

 

Interview with Saudi origin psychiatrist practicing in Germany on the islamization of Europe

Posted on by

This is quite an important interview. A Saudi origin psychiatrist in Germany attempts to help genuine refugees from Islamic nations anywhere from the KSA to Canada, only to find the German Government itself persecuting apostates from Islam and green lighting the very jihadis decent folks are fleeing from.

What we have here is evidence of the actual intention of the mass immigration across the West as a destructive effort to deracinate Western peoples altogether.

Please click through to RAIR for the summary and write up of this interview. To see the interview, click play below.

Hillel Neuer talk in Montreal, Friday December 6th 2024: Exposing the mass narrative attack against Israel and Jews

Posted on by

On Friday, Hillel Neuer of UN Watch came to speak to a small, but interesting group of academics and students in Montreal about the facts on the ground concerning the UN, Mass line narrative attacks against Israel, and a detailed expose of some of the UN principle people along with organizations who are clearly operating by Marxist beliefs and intentions, as well as in method. They are operating dialectically instead of any kind of procedures Westerners would consider an attempt at truth or understanding.

RAIR Foundation has an excellent write up. And for those who wish to send this talk to their associates, who may not be ready for how this site sees things, I recommend sending the RAIR link to them.

In terms of how we do see things, and how they dovetail with Hillel’s talk, there are two main points he raised which nearly rocked me back out of my chair.

  1. Hillel’s pointing out intersectional lines of action, using Genocide accusations against Israel to negate the value of the Holocaust as a deterrent for antisemitism and specifically to allow it to become mainstream again
  2. That the anti Israel messaging by media and in the streets by Muslims and leftists, is every bit as much of a mass line narrative attack as is global warming and the vaxx and covid, the religion of peace. etc. etc.

First, the presentation:

Here is the bit that caught my attention especially:

Below is one of the slides from Stephen’s presentation with us a few weeks ago. It is one of the most impactful from my particular understanding.

At the simplest level, you have the method of attack, or the ‘oppressed group’ to be used as an attack vector on the bottom half of the wheel, and the thing being attacked, an attribute of Western civilization at the top half. These are called, “Intersectional lines of attack.” And after watching Hillel’s presentation, we could add accuse Israel of Genocide on the bottom of the wheel with a new line to the top which says taboo on antisemitism.

Stephen’s recent interview/briefing below:

So the punch line is that the accusations of an Israeli genocide against the Palestinians is exactly the same tactic derived from the same strategy as: Global Warming, The Vaxx, Covid lockdowns, and every other mass line narrative attack we face all the time now. All meant to be destructive, and all being very effective at it.

Anyone interested in seeing Hillel’s Herculean efforts at the United nations should search YouTube for UN Watch, or Hillel Neuer.

Dutch MP spells out the destruction of the peoples of the Netherlands in plain language

Posted on by

Great to hear, but frustrating cause we all know exactly nothing will change, they will attempt to quel anyone speaking obvious truth, and like the mayor of a small Ontario town that decided to fight the “Human Rights Commission”, will likely get debanked and worse. Maybe re watch the interveiw with Rasmus Paludan for an example of what he can expect.

RAIR has the details

The naked revolution on display in Canada

Posted on by

Posting has been non-existent today because I have put in a double shift editing together a new interview with Stephen Coughlin.

I wanted to do something about the Montreal riots which would offer more value than just reactionary rage. With any luck at all it will be published tomorrow, or in the next few days at least.

In the meantime, here is a rather amazing little clip which shows how advanced the revolution actually is. It is dropping the curtain. it is showing it’s true intent and motives. This short clip from somewhere in Canada should be enough to bring to fruition a counter-revolution of sufficient magnitude.

One might think in the US this has already happened. We shall wait and see. meanwhile:

Three items concerning freedom of speech, something which likely won’t even exist as a concept soon

Posted on by

First, let me preface this little collection of items with a simple concept.

Freedom of speech as a concept was invented for one thing and one thing only. The right to criticize or mock or say what we like about political and religious authority. Without that, we have no freedoms at all. Not even to criticize something as benign as women’s fashion. Which in Afghanistan is already non existent and is disappearing here as well. Islam is both a religious and political system. So they are fighting tooth and nail to stop any criticism of it in every way they can think of. And it has worked and continues to work at more and more levels of our civilization.

See if you can find a common denominator in these three items:

Number one: an Article from RAIR Foundation with the accompanying video below on the threat Islam poses to freedom of speech in the US

Secondly, in Canada, constitutional lawyers are fighting various new restrictions named in an Orwellian manner as ‘anti-bullying’ when in fact it is bullies creating and enforcing it for their own protection from criticism.

Lastly, a short compilation of contemporary tyrants explaining why you must not be allowed to challenge state narratives.

From the essay that accompanies the novel, 1984 on Newspeak. This could be seen as occurring today in Islam with respect to the words, justice, where it means sharia, or freedom. Which means to implement the sharia. But in terms of Western political freedom, you decide if the direction is headed towards the excerpt below:

 Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and
often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could
properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the
possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly
by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable
words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and
so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever. To give a single
example. The word FREE still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be
used in such statements as 'This dog is free from lice' or 'This field is
free from weeds'. It could not be used in its old sense of 'politically
free' or 'intellectually free' since political and intellectual freedom no
longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless.

The Metric system is a commie plot

Posted on by

In conversation, the title statement never fails to get a laugh. I use it as a political ice breaker all the time. And once they stop laughing I remind them how it went in Canada.

Anyone who needed to use the metric system, scientists and so on, already did. There was no prohibition on it whatsoever. You could use the Kelvin temperature scale if you wanted to, and its far better in terms of scientific measure of temperature for that matter. But what Pierre Trudeau did, was permanently change the culture with the stroke of a pen, disconnecting us from our past and way of seeing the measure of things, very human ways of measuring things, and make it an imprisonable offence to do so in the way in which we always had done it.

Imprisonable.

You could face 6 months in prison for measuring meat in pounds at a grocery store, or gasoline in gallons at a gas station, or milk in quarter gallons. (Quarts)

Over 90% of our trade was with the United States, who used the Imperial system for all things. Forcing us to change systems made it clumsy at the very least for dealing with our #1, #2, and #3 customer for all things, the USA. Not to mention milling boards and so on in a way that wouldn’t fit their blueprints was an especially stupid thing to do if the purpose of Metric had any practical value, which it did not. As I already said, people who needed to use metric, had been already using it for their purposes.

Joe Clark who managed to get into power briefly when Trudeau Sr. had managed to become as unpopular as his son is now for similar reasons, created the freedom to measure act, and took away any penalty for how we wished to quantify things. But most of the damage was done.

The real point of it was to use state power to eliminate a huge chunk of our past and our culture. Something they now are extending to the language and many other aspects of our culture and history, and in as destructive a way possible.

In the past couple of days I have been listening to the audiobook of 1984 and just this morning happened across this passage:

 The old man whom he had followed was standing at the bar, having
some kind of altercation with the barman, a large, stout, hook-nosed young
man with enormous forearms. A knot of others, standing round with glasses
in their hands, were watching the scene.

'I arst you civil enough, didn't I?' said the old man, straightening his
shoulders pugnaciously. 'You telling me you ain't got a pint mug in the
'ole bleeding boozer?'

'And what in hell's name IS a pint?' said the barman, leaning forward with
the tips of his fingers on the counter.

''Ark at 'im! Calls 'isself a barman and don't know what a pint is! Why,
a pint's the 'alf of a quart, and there's four quarts to the gallon.
'Ave to teach you the A, B, C next.'

'Never heard of 'em,' said the barman shortly. 'Litre and half
litre--that's all we serve. There's the glasses on the shelf in front
of you.'

'I likes a pint,' persisted the old man. 'You could 'a drawed me off a pint
easy enough. We didn't 'ave these bleeding litres when I was a young man.'

'When you were a young man we were all living in the treetops,' said the
barman, with a glance at the other customers.

There was a shout of laughter, and the uneasiness caused by Winston's entry
seemed to disappear. The old man's white-stubbled face had flushed pink. He
turned away, muttering to himself, and bumped into Winston. Winston caught
him gently by the arm.

'May I offer you a drink?' he said.

'You're a gent,' said the other, straightening his shoulders again. He
appeared not to have noticed Winston's blue overalls. 'Pint!' he added
aggressively to the barman. 'Pint of wallop.'

The barman swished two half-litres of dark-brown beer into thick glasses
which he had rinsed in a bucket under the counter. Beer was the only drink
you could get in prole pubs. The proles were supposed not to drink gin,
though in practice they could get hold of it easily enough. The game of
darts was in full swing again, and the knot of men at the bar had begun
talking about lottery tickets. Winston's presence was forgotten for a
moment. There was a deal table under the window where he and the old man
could talk without fear of being overheard. It was horribly dangerous, but
at any rate there was no telescreen in the room, a point he had made sure
of as soon as he came in.

''E could 'a drawed me off a pint,' grumbled the old man as he settled down
behind a glass. 'A 'alf litre ain't enough. It don't satisfy. And a 'ole
litre's too much. It starts my bladder running. Let alone the price.'

Curiously, Orwell appears to make one of the same points that I usually do arguing this point. A pint, he explains in the voice of the old man, is the right amount of beer. A litre is too much, and a half litre doesn’t satisfy.

A mile is about as far as you want to walk to a grocery store. A foot is around the length of a foot. A yard is around the length of your arm. Nearly every adult has a finger bone that is nearly exactly an inch. A pound is intuitive. And I have yet to hear any songsmith craft, “500 kilometres” and create any pathos with it,

These are human measures. They are in harmony with our experience.

Of course young people raised with the metric system in Canada and the UK won’t get the point of this post at all. They are used to it. It is how it is. The fact that it is state mandated culture, and that it caused the erasure of a thousand years of Western development means nothing to them.

It is somewhat like my objection to people who dismiss my concerns about Islam taking over in the West. Some people respond that it hardly matters. They will, in order to continue to enjoy the perks of society, just pretend to be Muslim. But inside they know what they think and feel.

But the children, the children will be the real thing. They will identify as Muslim because the cost of not doing so will be very high. And if some children are willing to have their genitals and breasts cut off for a sense of belonging, it won’t be hard to get over 99% of them to say the shahada. And their children will turn in their faking-it grandparents as hypocrites. Munafiq. The penalty for that is likely death as it easily could be viewed as a kind of apostasy. And just like communism, where any kid can turn in any adult for harbouring counter-revolutionary thoughts.

17 years ago or so, friends of mine with children in public school showed me an assignment the kids had. They were to report to the teacher any inefficient washing machines or light bulbs their parents had and report on it to the teacher. They were to rat out their parents for carbon heresies. And that was over 15 years ago. Now, the parents can lose the children altogether if they defy state narratives to the children at home. Saying for instance that a man is a man and a woman is a woman is a criminal offence if a teacher or councillor is trying to convince your child of the metaphysical position that he or she was born in the wrong body. You could lose your children and go to jail under Trudeau’s ironically named, Anti-Conversion therapy bill, C-4.

Leftists and Muslims in Canada finally state the goal: The total destruction of Canada, the US, and Israel

Posted on by

It is truly appreciated when the left takes their mask off.

Up until now they have used initiate language to express their true goals during the protests all year. Phrases like “From Turtle Island to the sea”, where Turtle Island is a kind of leftist code for North America during anti-Israel marches, as a way of indicating that they are against Western Civ altogether, and not just Israel.

Here we have from Vancouver some excellent examples of the full frontal hatred of us all that the left has, and why they have allied themselves with Islam. I mention it because so many still think the Queers for Palestine indicates stupidity on the part of gay people about Islam, when really its a sign of hatred against the West which is greater than the concern of Islamic treatment of homosexuals, a group which the left has used to their purpose but never gave a damn about. Read Che Guevara on that point. He was pretty clear on his views of homosexuals. He arranged for them to be in slave labour camps. What the CBC might call, Cuban subsidized housing and government meal plans.

 

 

UK debate about criminalizing “Islamophobia” is really about taking total control of what is legal to say

Posted on by

First, a debate segment where the new communist Labour government of the UK is asked to define Islamophobia, the claim being the government intends to criminalize it.

Robert Spencer has a couple of paragraphs on it here. He makes the important distinction between attacking Muslim people who haven’t done anything and criticizing or exposing the ideology which motivates so many acts against Western peoples and institutions.

Our issue though is a lot more concerning. We see this, like nearly all leftist policies, as a thin disguise over another agenda. That of criminalizing truth itself. The right of the state to determine what is legal to say and what is not. The massive narrowing of what is permitted to say, and what is not. Or put more accurately perhaps, if a free society is defined by all that which is not expressly forbidden is permitted, and a totalitarian communist or Islamic state is defined as all that which is not expressly permitted is forbidden, then this legislation, which they in our opinion, quite deliberately will not define for reasons which will become clear later in this post, is the topping point between a free society and an authoritarian one. Although in the case of the UK that claim could be made over events taking place every week since the new Labour communist government took over.

Please watch this important video from the OCSE meeting several years ago where the various influential diplomats and journalists explain how truth can be hate speech. The OCSE is a meaningful group. They help set policies across the West.

OSCE from 2013: Communist think tank Runnymede discusses Islamophobia:

Most of this video in fact does deal with islamophobia, even if they don’t use that word much. But it is all equivocating about criminalizing criticism of Islam based on hate-speech narratives.

Leftist language appears in nearly all cases to be a kind of sheep costume on a predatory wolf. Which goes a long way to explaining the logo of the staggeringly influential British communist think tank, the Fabian Society.

I asked Chat GPT the following Question:

What is UK PM Starmer’s relationship to the Fabian Society

Chat GPT itself is a cunning tool to try and move all thought, history and dialogue to the left. One has to treat it like a live virus vaccine. Too much of it will give you the disease you are trying to inoculate yourself against.

Here is its answer: 

“Keir Starmer’s relationship with the Fabian Society is closely aligned with his political philosophy and leadership of the Labour Party. While he is not strictly a Fabian in every aspect, his policies and approaches often resonate with Fabian principles, particularly in his focus on gradual reform and social democracy. In 2021, Starmer published a 12,000-word essay, The Road Ahead, under the Fabian Society’s banner, outlining his vision for Britain. This publication reaffirmed his alignment with key Fabian ideals, such as a commitment to fair wages, responsible public spending, and support for working families.

The Fabian Society, a long-established socialist think tank, advocates for democratic socialism and has influenced Labour leaders for over a century. Starmer’s focus on incremental change, rather than radical overhaul, reflects the Society’s approach, which favors reformist methods over revolutionary tactics. His leadership strategy mirrors Fabian values, particularly in his emphasis on evidence-based policy, worker’s rights, and environmental action?-

(Fabians, LabourList, Wikipedia)

 

Thus, while Starmer is not exclusively defined by Fabian ideology, he shares many of the Society’s core values, and his association with it helps shape his Labour Party leadership.”

Ok then. Even at face-value we get the picture. And when we decode it from ChatGPT to plain talk it gets clearer. Starmer is a communist, but distanced himself enough from the Fabians to make himself believable once elected as PM.

In other words, the debate segment at the top of this post, DELIBERATELY does not define Islamophobiia in order to make it maleable enough to apply to anyone for any reason.

Interesting.

Know who else was a member of the Fabians? A founding member in fact?

George Bernard Shaw.

Here he is explaining what a socialist state should do to those who socialists feel are not valuable to society:

Christopher Hitchens did warn us:

Explaining equity, and then showing how it results in brutal totalitarianism

Posted on by

1. New Counterspell video on the dialectics of equity. It is rare that there is a peril in not seeing a video. But don’t watch this one at your collective peril. This needs to be understood to at least some degree for us to fight back effectively.

2. Ireland: Please watch this and then consider the video in item 1.

3. Toronto: Islamic street prayers block major Toronto road and street car tracks.

And here we are.

When is a gay pride parade, not a gay pride parade?

Posted on by

Nothing is ever as it seems.

And Ottawa’s second “Pride” parade for the summer of 2024 is a classic example of that.

Before we dig in to the videos and photos, a few things need to be explained.

Firstly, it’s most likely that the majority of people in the parade and even on the sidelines watching, were by today’s standards, normal people enjoying a party and with no sinister intentions. Though we didn’t show any spectators on the streets, although often, they were the most unusual, besting some of the top efforts of the various kink groups in the actual march.

But what we are trying to demonstrate here, is how the left and Islam manage to penetrate an event and then repurpose it for their causes. Which would be the communist revolution, and Islamic supremacy.

In order to understand thit, one has to know a couple of things.

Using Islam as an example, reading the Koran does not mean that much unless you understand two things about it in advance.

The Koran is not written in chronological order, but from longest chapter to shortest. So reading start to finish does not give an order of events.

Mohammad invented what he calls, The Law of Abrogation. Which means whatever he said on any given subject, abrogates, or cancels or negates, anything he said earlier in time on the same subject.

Knowing this, you can easily tell that if you read something nice and wholesome in the Koran, you just have to look in chapters that came after it in time, rather than in the book’s page order, and you will know where Muslims actually stand on the issue. Typically it’s a much worse or more hostile attitude towards whatever the subject is.

LGBTQ is much like that. In order to understand how sexual identity has been captured to become more of a weapon against republic forms of governments than anything to do with rights for any group based on sexual proclivities, it is necessary to know what the Q in LGBTQ stands for.

Many years ago, queer was a slang expression for a homosexual. But that would make the L & the G redundant one would think.

That is no longer its meaning.. The following video by James Lindsay explains it beautifully. Queer, means anyone of any sexual preferences, including straight white married people, who believes in weaponizing sexual identity as a battering ram against Western Civilization.

In the case of the Pride Parade in Ottawa on the 25th of August, and for some reason, the second Pride Parade this summer, and despite June being in its entirely, ‘Pride month’,  it was both the Muslims and communists that managed to penetrate the event and make it into something quite different than what most participants expect it to be.

Note the fully anti-western messaging. “Queers for Palestine”, and we now know what Queer actually means, and the idea that Canada itself is built on stolen land where they pick a tribe, more or less out of a hat, as Amer-Indian tribes routinely went to war and took over each other’s tribal areas. Sometimes even in genocidal wars.

The purpose of this messaging, is to delegitimize the Western nation-state as an organizational principle as a whole, as none of these leftist groups have conceded any of their own properties to Amer-Indian bands.

If, the logic might flow, Western nations like Canada (and the US) are built on stolen lands, then we have no right to object to the total negation of our own people and culture by the mass migration that is now taking place across the Western world. The obvious purpose of the constant land claims acknowledgements we are subjected to.

The degree of penetration of the event by the communists and anti-Israel, antisemitic groups had become so obvious that some surprising regular supporters of these marches pulled out in advance.

The Federal Liberals actually withdrew from the parade. The Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario and other major supporters of the event also pulled out of this march.

The following clip is from Canada’s narrative network, CTV. Note the language of the interviewee in the Palestinian headscarf at around the 2 minute mark.

His use of the word Queer, perfectly aligns with the video above. It helps that he uses it in a string of adjectives such as “anti-capitalist zionist…” etc. etc. to understand its actual purpose. ‘Queer’, being a political position, and a sort of Shepard of non-standard sexual identities for communism.

Although this video is about the parade that took place in Montreal, the groups who pulled out of the Ottawa parade are signifiant, as they usually show full throated support of anything of this nature.

Here is a partial list of the organizations who publicly withdrew from the Ottawa Pride-parade Mark II:

City of Ottawa: The city administration and staff followed the Mayor’s decision and did not participate.

Ottawa-Carleton District School Board: The school board withdrew its participation.

University of Ottawa (uOttawa): The university held its own Pride celebration instead of participating in the Capital Pride event.

Jewish Federation of Ottawa: The organization held a separate Pride breakfast and celebration, citing concerns about safety and inclusivity.

Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario: The hospital did not participate.

The Ottawa Hospital: The hospital did not participate.

Montfort Hospital: The hospital did not participate.

Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre: The hospital did not participate.

Conseil des écoles catholiques du Centre-Est: The French Catholic school board did not participate.

Conseil des écoles publiques de l’Est de l’Ontario: The French public school board did not participate.

Ottawa Tourism: The organization did not participate.

Bank of Canada: The bank did not participate.

Loblaw: Although still listed as a sponsor, Loblaw did not participate in the event.

One of the more interesting moments of the parade was when a gentleman, seemingly of Islamic origin and wearing a Palestinian war-scarf, was carrying a Che Guevara flag in the middle of the march.

Islamic countries hang homosexuals from cranes or decapitate them. And Che used to round up homosexuals and put them in slave labour camps to make war materials.

This beautifully illustrates the nature of the march as it is now, at least in Ottawa.

As we saw throughout the summer, where a ‘Pride’ March has not been captured, it ran into groups of communists and anti-Israel activists where the march was stopped and its mood dramatically changed.

One man decided to brave presenting a counter-narrative and marched with an Israeli flag and a message of inclusivity. But where anyone was near him, they sported Palestinian flags and paraphernalia.

There was very little in terms of kerfuffle, which is the good news. A small group of counter-protestors showed up with signs and were mostly ignored. Some of the more aggressive of the leftist protestors decided to surround them so that they could not be seen or see the event. They used flags as a sort of weapon, blocking the counter-demo. When it started to get a little aggressive, Ottawa police handled it in the usual exemplary manner they always do at Ottawa protests.

Which is to say defuse, stop the worst behaviour, and the event carries on without casualties or incidents. Which. under today’s revolutionary state, is about the best you can hope for.

The people who initiated aggressive behaviour towards the counter-demo were the usual seemingly white, young college students tightly wrapped in Palestinian war-scarves.

And with all this in mind, it should now be a much more meaningful video.

We tried to select the scenes that illustrate this aspect of it in the video below. Again, most people who participate, are likely fun loving, law abiding people whose views are shaped by the culture we have today. Even if that culture is imposed by the left. So those parts of the parade are edited out, as are the more kinky aspects of it. That would be grist for another article altogether.

What we are after, is to illustrate the creation of destructive lines of effort against Western Civilization such as the pride movement, and when its components become normalized, the hijacking of that event by farther and farther leftist and anti-civilizational efforts. This, like many things now in our surroundings, are about constantly moving the culture to the left. Towards destruction of our systems, culture, values and beliefs.

As always with our videos, please click on the little gear at bottom right of the video window and select the highest quality to more easily read signs and see detail.

Similar post can be found at RAIR

“That’s Mr. Assh*le to you!”

Posted on by

A leftist activist, famous in Ottawa for provoking conflicts and initiating direct confrontations at every kind of protest that takes place, has been jailed early in the spring for a variety of charges including interfering with an arrest, and I believe, assaulting a senior member of the Jewish community as he was leaving a Muslim Jewish friendship dinner, or something very much like that. The details are vague, but that is how I heard it from a regular in the area. Here is a news item from The Ottawa Citizen on her and the arrest but it’s curiously vague. The Jerusalem Post also has a story on her.

She has been allowed out of jail after months inside, apparently today, which is an interesting coincidence as tomorrow, there is a planned massive protest against Israel in Ottawa with people bussed in from Montreal and Toronto, as the posters claim in any case. This sort of protest is her water and air.

Below, she taunts Chris Dacey, an Ottawa Journalist who has captured her antics on video a number of times, and from whom Chris Dacey has a pending peace bond application. Also, she taunts a Muslim community leader in Ottawa, Kamel El-Cheikh, and in fact, the very one who organized some of the marches against SOGI. This is likely her complaint against him. That he rallies Conservative non-Muslims as well as the Muslim community to demonstrate together against the Trans-narrative and Queer dialectic attacks on Western Civ.

Her taunting of him is especially interesting. She claims he is not a Muslim, while she herself claims to be Muslim. She made that claim when she staged a one person counter-demonstration at the Ottawa Carleton District School board on June 13th, 2023.

Perhaps a better reading of the Koran concerning homosexuality may assist her in knowing who is and is not a Muslim. At least if you define one as being adherent to Islamic doctrine. Most of us do.

Clearly her concern when it comes to the taunting and blunt insults of the Islamic community leader is that his alliance with classically liberal Canadians threatens the communist-Islamic bulwark against the West overall.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Chris Dacey (@dacey_media)

RAIR Foundation did an interview with Kamil at the large demonstration against SOGI (Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity) which he organized last fall. He is an eminently reasonable man by all appearances. And he handled Sherif rather well under the trying circumstances. He is apparently planning another one in September.

 

Three incidents of antisemitism which show that communism is implemented by the culture as much as by the state

Posted on by

The first one is a minor but meaningful incident in Australia. While it was resolved by the company and very well, it does not mean that it never happened, or that there is no meaning in it.

Here is a link to a story about how a girl working at a print shop in Australia refused to laminate something for a guy because it had Israeli or Jewish content.

Without doing too deep a dive into this, its likely this worker abused a company rule that allowed them to avoid pornographic material that would be offensive to them in order to justify refusing to laminate this gentlemen’s page. The company did exactly what it should have done, and more. But the question is, how did we get here. How did we get to a place where people can’t show a Jewish heritage or support of Israel, wear a trump hat, or show support for any counter-narrative position without people on the street or with whom they are working with, then feeling justified in whatever measure they may chose to take against you?

Communism it seems, has been implemented via the culture. A Jewish person may not feel comfortable ordering take out when the restaurant staff or delivery person has their name. What might they do rather than just refuse service? Or anyone famously conservative for that matter. We no longer have a trust based society. In fact, we clearly are moving from a de jure society to a de facto one in the sense that it doesn’t matter what the law says when calculating the consequences of expressing a view.  Or even belonging to a group to which others would impute your views onto you and then punish you for them.

The second: A mohel, or a Rabbi specifically trained in how to do circumcisions as Jewish ritual was arrested and jailed and denied bail in Ireland. Keep in mind, Muslims also do circumcision as religious ritual. Not aware of any arrests of their practitioners. And if one imagines that in Ireland they are not doing this also to women with relatively untrained people, they are living in a myopic dream state. This site is full of examples of this having been discovered, right up to where the media stopped reporting on it.

Man in court charged with circumcising child in Dublin

A 47-year-old man has appeared in court charged with circumcising a child at a house in Dublin two days ago without being a registered medical practitioner.

Jonathan Abraham, with an address in London, was remanded in custody.

The judge refused bail on the grounds of the seriousness of the charge, the potential flight risk and the nature of the offence.

Mr Abraham was brought by detectives from Blanchardstown before Dublin District Court.

He is accused of performing a surgical procedure – the circumcision of a male child – without being a medical practitioner.

The offence is contrary to section 37 of the Medical Practitioners Act 2007.

Detective Garda Megan Furey said that she arrested Mr Abraham at 10.15pm last night at Blanchardstown Garda Station and when the charge was put to him, he made no reply.

The court was told that gardaí went into a house in west Dublin on 30 July after 1pm with the consent of homeowners and Mr Abraham was there dressed in a white doctor’s style coat, wearing blue gloves, with medical implements nearby.

Det Gda Furey said that a very young child was naked on a changing pad and a circumcision had been carried out on another child.

She objected to bail. She said he had flown into Ireland at 12pm and had a return flight for 7pm.

Defence solicitor Tertius Van Eeden said that Mr Abraham was a rabbi and a member of the oldest Anglo-Jewish society that governs the practice and procedure for circumcision.

He said he was a mohel, a person trained and allowed to carry out the practice in line with the Jewish faith.

Read the rest at the link above. And whatever your views of this practice are, the issue is the selective enforcement against the Jewish community it in a way that has broader political implications. This kind of enforcement has a word, dia dia something.

Meanwhile in Canada: The hate crime arrests in numbers by a Toronto Police chief.

The concept of hate speech and hate crimes is anathema to a republic. Crime is crime. Motives is up to the trial to determine and punishment is up to the judge to determine based on those motives and the damage done. The notion of thought crimes gives ultimate power to the state and the state will use it in the interests of the state and at the expense of the people. It will be enforced dialectically. We already see that with gangs of communists, college LARPers and Muslims calling for Jewish blood on most Western city streets with a university, and no charges or even statistics recorded. But should anyone say anything that counters the revolutionary narratives, well watch the UK. Here is a link to PJ Watson with a few examples of how the same politicians spoke about violent minority riots in 2020 and the ones this weekend. If they can enforce on reality this diabolically, then what can they do with thought and speech crimes. Hell telling us all what we meant by what we say started as early as the 1960s when words started to be banned for some groups because of what they told us we meant as if we didn’t know why we used those words.

That started a trend in which the entire language became the patented property of the left. You then had to mean what they said, and you better not say it.

As the revolution is not quite complete, or because the above video serves it in some way that isn’t immediately obvious, we see that hate-crimes are still phenomenally more against the Jewish community than against any other group, on top of it being generally protected by the state. Ezra Levant did a great job of demonstrating that with the arson of a Jewish school and several school busses used to bring Jewish kids to school in Toronto. in the past month. The media and police denied the nature of those crimes and the police went so far to specifically deny arson of the Jewish school claiming it was just a homeless guy with a hobo-fire went awry. The Media managed to avoid any mention of the school busses being next to a Jewish school and having Hebrew signs all over them. They only mentioned, the two media that did mention it at all, CTV and City News, that the busses were parked next to a discount grocer.

Since we now know for a fact that this is how it was reported and recorded, at least initially till Rebel found the facts, we can then safely ask, how many attacks on Jewish people, Christians, white people by communists and Muslims are not reported? Once you know the state and the media lies to you, you actually know a great deal. But coming to accept that is difficult.