…because it’s in the Hadiths!
Category Archives: exposing Islam
A few clips from the May 13th Sharia Free America Caucus
I will begin with Amy Mek’s testimony. It was stellar. So refreshing to see the issue plainly stated in Congress without weasel words. No, “Islamism”. No “Islamic extremism”. After all, as Sam Harris once said, “The problem with Islamic fundamentalism is the fundamentals of Islam”.
A truism as well as great rhetoric.
If you cannot name the enemy you cannot fight it. Another truism. Amy named it.
This fellow is 16. He busted a MSA effort at penetrating his rural high school. A plot to which the leftist administration was all to happy to assist with.
Rep. Glenn Grothman, Wisconsin’s 6th Congressional District discusses the Islamic element of America’s population and its reaction to the October 7th attacks in Israel.
And near the end, Congressman Chip Roy, a man who stood up against the various Covid measures and the vaxx like no one else in the Federal house had done, discusses the issue of Islam and sharia in the US both with Amy and a dhimmi useful idiot by the Muslim Brotherhood
The entire hearing can be seen here, where this is a lot of testimony not covered in these clips, some onside and a lot of classic leftist rhetorical devices by Democrats, who less than deftly deflect with a joiner-sentence and then blame everything on Donald Trump.
Typically this tactic is called “Whataboutism”. Previously known as the “Red Herring Fallacy”. I guess it could be a subset of Ignoratio Elenchi, the irrelevant conclusion fallacy but this new variant is so stupid that it is the people who fall for it that should be ashamed.
MUST WATCH: Sharia Free America Caucus from Wednesday May 13, 2026
Chip Roy: Islam is not compatible with American Constitutional Values
We have been watching Chip Roy closely ever since the early days of Covid, when he was one of the only representative we could find who spoke very bluntly about the attack on our freedoms that the Covid and mRNA Lines of Action represented. He is a truly refreshing voice in the US legislature. Canada would not even dare fantasize about having someone this truth connected in a position of any authority.
In the recent launch of the Sharia Free Caucus on February 3rd, of which Chip Roy is a co-founder, he gave the following presentation, a synopsis of which can be read at RAIR Foundation.
RAIR Foundation Texas Director testifies in Congress on the nature of Islam and its effects in the Lone Star State
If anyone ever wondered what it meant when someone says “opening the Overton Window”, I think this may be an excellent example. Until now, one could not talk about Islam or sharia law in the way it was described, both in the Congressional hearings on Feb. 10th, or the launch of the Sharia-Free-America Caucus on February 3rd.
Anyone who has ever been concerned, and especially who have given up hope for a solution on the destruction of liberty and individualism that Islam was created to cause, should watch all the videos of those two events.
Article at RAIR Foundation.
Krista Schild: Texas director of RAIR Foundation
Robert Spencer testifies as to the real nature of Islam and sharia law in America
This is a truly momentous event. Please watch and share this video and read the article at RAIR Foundation
At last! ONE elected representative has the raw courage to speak the unmitigated truth about Islam as a threat doctrine – THIS IS EPIC
More explanation to come. But this is a segment of today’s first ever Sharia-Free America Caucus Press Conference.
Muslims are building a Caliphate within the USA institution by institution
RIAR Foundation has just published a major exposé on how an Islamic medical establishment in Florida is being constructed in a way which is, shall we say less than constitutionally compliant.
I strongly recommend clicking through to RAIR to read it and see the video set that accompanies it. But to bait the hook, here is a small clip of one of the videos along with what we think is the key to understanding the importance of this entire issue.
I asked Chat GPT for a solid and defensible definition for the Islamic concept of “Waqf” and here it is:
Declaring an organization or a territory a “Waqf” is a major declaration under Islam.
What it actually is:
Waqf (Arabic: ???) is an irrevocable Islamic religious endowment in which property or assets are permanently removed from ordinary civil ownership and placed under Islamic legal control in perpetuity, for purposes defined as religious, charitable, or serving Islam.
Once something is declared waqf:
It can never be sold, inherited, mortgaged, or repurposed
It is considered owned by Allah
Human administrators (mutawallis) merely manage, they do not own
Secular authorities are religiously illegitimate overseers
Core legal characteristics
1. Perpetuity
Waqf is eternal by design.
There is no expiration, sunset clause, or reversion.This means:
Land (Or institutions) declared waqf can never return to neutral or civil status
Even centuries later, the claim remains valid in Islamic jurisprudence
2. Supremacy over secular law
In classical Islamic law:
Waqf obligations override man-made law
A Muslim may not legitimately obey a secular order that violates a waqf
This creates parallel sovereignty.
3. Irreversibility
Even if:
The donor is dead
The institution collapses
The population changes
The land is conquered
The waqf remains binding in Islamic legal thought.
This is why disputes over land, mosques, and “holy sites” are non-negotiable from a sharia perspective.
4. Political, not merely charitable
While often sold in the West as “Islamic charity,” waqf historically funded:
Mosques
Madrassas
Courts
Militias
Jihad logistics
Administrative governance
It is a state-building instrument, not just philanthropy.
Please think about this and its importance. This is essentially a unilateral declaration of separation of territory in every possible way with the United States from within the United States, without any sort of negotiation or referendum. This is the declaration that allows Muslims to feel justified in permanently fighting to retake Israel and Spain.
The state of the UK: An interview with Anne Marie Waters
We followed Anne from way back. She was one of the most courageous and determined women in the UK in terms of pushing back against the destruction of Great Britain and the West in general via Islamic migration.
While many readers may be familiar with a lot of these points, some are indeed new. The fact that Great Britain now teaches a dialectical version of history in which the aboriginal Brits including the monarchs are Africans is new, but certainly consistent with the communist, ie dialectical state of which Kier Starmer is now the COMINTERN viceroy. It won’t be long till Chat GPT confirms this history, and the next generation, who will not be taught critical thinking skills or evidence based analysis, will accept it as the way it is.
As it happens, these kinds of things are showing up on my Twitter feed. But frankly evidence of the claim of the deracination of Great Britain (and the West) is hardly necessary. If it is done this way or that way, it is what is being done. And that is what matters. Essentially it would be like arguing what calibre bullets the enemy is using when they fire on you and yours, when your friends and allies still can’t accept that you are being fired upon.
Even so, this is showing up in the feed:
More: Watch the video please..
It’s is worth doing a word search on an online copy of 1984 for the term, “memory hole”. I think the really interesting bit is where he accuses his fellow Britains, or denizens of Airstrip One, of falling for a narrative that flatly contradicts the one shoved at them by the Ministry of Truth just the day before on Chocolate rations.
“…But actually, he thought as he re-adjusted the Ministry of Plenty’s
figures, it was not even forgery. It was merely the substitution of one
piece of nonsense for another. Most of the material that you were dealing
with had no connexion with anything in the real world, not even the kind of
connexion that is contained in a direct lie. Statistics were just as much
a fantasy in their original version as in their rectified version. A great
deal of the time you were expected to make them up out of your head. For
example, the Ministry of Plenty’s forecast had estimated the output of
boots for the quarter at 145 million pairs. The actual output was given as
sixty-two millions. Winston, however, in rewriting the forecast, marked
the figure down to fifty-seven millions, so as to allow for the usual claim
that the quota had been overfulfilled. In any case, sixty-two millions was
no nearer the truth than fifty-seven millions, or than 145 millions. Very
likely no boots had been produced at all. Likelier still, nobody knew
how many had been produced, much less cared. All one knew was that every
quarter astronomical numbers of boots were produced on paper, while perhaps
half the population of Oceania went barefoot. And so it was with every
class of recorded fact, great or small. Everything faded away into a
shadow-world in which, finally, even the date of the year had become
uncertain.
[…]
For the moment he had shut his ears to
the remoter noises and was listening to the stuff that streamed out of the
telescreen. It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank
Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grammes a week. And
only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was
to be REDUCED to twenty grammes a week. Was it possible that they could
swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it. Parsons
swallowed it easily, with the stupidity of an animal.
We need a few million more of this guy. It is one of the few things the public can actually do that might either fix things, or force the communist revolution to move from Covert to Overt, perhaps before it is entirely ready to do so.
2014: Bill Mahar debates Charlie Rose on the nature of Islam: Reality Vs. state narratives
Bill Mahar used to also have Burka Beauty contests. Something no one would dare do now. Terrorism works. Especially when leftist governments work with the terrorists to achieve very similar goals, meaning the total suppression of individualism and freedom of speech and bodily autonomy, except wjhere it is destructive.
Whatever your views on abortion are, the fact that its a sacrament to the leftist state while refusing to take an experimental and often deadly gene therapy shot was at least crime-adjacent, suggests that the overarching principle was and remains, ‘whatever is more destructive to Western People is how it’s going to be.’
King Charles has planted his flag, and it is with the enemy
What follows, is a classical British, gentle, slow and methodical exposé of King Charles and his now revealed alliance with the Muslims and communist and their persuit of the destruction of the British peoples. Many would say that he has made this reveal many many times. And they would be correct. This seems a little more formal and clear however.
The actual speech. Nice of him to play God Save the King to himself. At this point, only God can.
The dialectical phrases, as readers of this site would know them to be, begins at around 5 minutes. About when the soporific tone of the first 5 minutes has made you click away, or lulled you into a receptive state. One would almost think his speech and its delivery were written and rehearsed with a hypnotist. All the examples described in the video above are indeed in the speech. The lies by omission, the construction of a DEI narrative etc. Some are outright lies, “…That there should be peace on Earth, in fact echos through all faiths” is a brutal lie. More than a lie. A narrative attack on Christians and British, and by extension, all Western cultures and peoples. Islam is a military doctrine. Anyone who doesn’t know that by now is beyond hope, or part of the deception Islam uses as part of a line of operation for conquest.
If there are any readers of this site from anywhere within the United Kingdom, please consider honouring this request.
Find and watch the film, Cromwell. If you have never seen it, please do as soon as you can. If you have not seen it for a long time, please consider watching it now in the current context. The King in that film was Charles the Ist.
Actually here it is, free on YouTube for the moment.
Oct. 6th Ottawa: Mother of one of the first victims of Oct. 7 Jihad attack against Israel speaks at Parliament Hill
This is an astonishing and painful account of what people hopefully will come to understand as a very classical islamic attack, in this case against the Jews and people of Israel, by the mother of one of its most heroic victims.
Below, this appears to be a scene from a documentary that we had published maybe 17 years ago, and cannot even remember the name of it now. But it was the best thing we had ever seen on the nature of Islam, and what motivates it. You can see from this scene (if anyone remembers the name of it, please leave it in the comments) how it relates to the October 7th attack of last year, and also the entire existence of the Islamic State.
There is a great deal to say about yesterday’s events on the hill. But one thing decidedly is noticeable as we have attended so many events on both ‘sides’ of the issue.
The side that is anti-Israel and anti-semitic etc. is also anti-Canada and anti-civilization. Even their use of the Palestinian flag strikes us as dialectical (for the purpose of destruction) in nature, as the state of Palestine does not exist, but it is a powerful propaganda weapon against the genuine state, and nation as apart from state, of Israel. Their chats are also anti-‘colonialist’. There is never a Canadian flag among the protests.
Compare that to the photo accompanying this post from yesterday.
Driving home from the event, we passed the Canadian HQ of Amnesty International.
We use the word, ‘dialectic’ or ‘dialectical’ way too much on this site. But also not nearly enough.
Have a look at the photo of the Amnesty Int. building in fashionable Sandy Hill and see if you can spot the dialectic attack.
If it had at least also said: “Return the hostages” …
Growing up Christian in an Islamic State, and the rationale behind the Pro-Life movement
Watching a talk given by Campaign Life’s astonishingly good speaker to Action for Canada, Ruth Robert in Ottawa May 17th, there was a couple of surprises.
You can read the content break down here at RAIR
Firstly, it is that she is such a profoundly reasonable and knowledgeable person on the subject of abortion. Although deeply religious, her approach to the issue shows wisdom beyond her years. Or at least beyond what her years appear to be.
The second surprise was that she grew up Christian in an Islamic State governed by Sharia law, and she built some of that experience into her talk on the issue of abortion in Canada. She was so knolegable, we just had to ask a couple of questions about it, one in the Q&A of her presentation, which we present here also as a separate video, and an interview with her about that aspect of her life.
Whatever your views on abortion, and they are likely as varied as the readership itself, this is a worthwhile presentation on the issue. And as a person living in a Western land under invasion by Islamic migration, her warning to you needs to be remembered and spread.
First, the whole presentation. As usual, for those interested in the best viewing experience, please click the little gear that appears after you click the play button, and select the highest quality.
Below is the question during the Q&A on her statements on living in an Islamic State as a non-Muslim
And lastly, a separate interview on the topic after her presentation:
Ruth was one of the speakers at the press conference on the March for Life by Campaign Life Coalition in early May. And yes, it was raining a lot at the presser.
Here are a couple of the videos from the march itself:
A few scenes from the actual gathering on the hill before the march through downtown by several thousand people. Possibly as many as eight or nine thousand.
I should say that overall the counter-demo was well behaved and very small. Maybe 100 people and mostly polite, at least by demonstration standards and some of the signage was clever and worthy of consideration. This is often not the case. ANTIFA sometimes shows up to counter these demonstrations and seeks attention by projecting critical theory attacks and tantrum like behaviour as much as possible. These people were probably too busy demanding the extermination of Israel to come to this event this year. So the counter-demo people who did show by and large were actually relatively decent. One woman decided to go topless for some reason, and a very tall person had silver face-paint and a fantasy costume of some kind, but the rest were OK. Personally I didn’t see a lot of insults or invective directed at the marchers. NDP Leader Jagmeet Sing was standing with them but at the back and it was hard to get video of him.
The march itself was amazing to watch as it always is. A large group of people indeed although over represented by Catholics and Catholic organizations, including a kind Catholic version of the Boy Scouts. A timely group now that the Boy Scouts themselves are anything but. Never having been to a meeting all we can know is they changed their name to avoid the word “Boy” and it would be an easy bet to make that they teach about ‘toxic masculinity”.
For those who were there, they will know that the general atmosphere of the March for Life is unlike any of the Soros funded or anti-West critical theory attacks on our civilization we have gotten used to in the past decade. These are, agree with them or not, kind, loving people who want the best for all people. Their intentions are clear. And they do have a point.
A couple of items on the treatment of people in Israel by the attacking Muslims from Gaza on October 7th
First, Alex Berenson: On the sexual atrocities Hamas committed on Oct. 7
On Thursday, The New York Times recounted in awful detail the sexual atrocities the men of Gaza committed during Hamas’s October 7 raid into Israel.
I know Jeffrey Gettleman, who had the piece’s lead byline. He is a serious reporter who served with distinction for many years in Africa. He doesn’t exaggerate.
Which is good, because the Times’s descriptions of these crimes nearly beggar belief. They go beyond rape, or gang rape, or even the execution of prisoners. As described by witnesses who survived, and confirmed by video and forensic evidence, Hamas’s attackers turned murder and torture into can-you-top-this sport:
The first victim she said she saw was a young woman with copper-color hair, blood running down her back, pants pushed down to her knees. One man pulled her by the hair and made her bend over. Another penetrated her, Sapir said, and every time she flinched, he plunged a knife into her back.
Please read the rest at Alex’ Substack linked above
Then there is the testimony of the hostage who has decided to speak. One might think that there is still a lot she is holding back for the sake of the remaining hostages. One can imagine from this interview how we might feel exactly the same as she did. The bombing would not be happening had it not been for the attack. And one can see how a hostage might be delighted to know her people were fighting back. Even bombs mean hope in that circumstance. Like the inmates of the Death Camps in Germany must have felt when they heard allied gunfire.
https://twitter.com/YaariCohen/status/1740830245698044087
Still looking for the full interview. This may be it:
https://twitter.com/AdamAlbilya/status/1740822874506625060
And let’s not forget the attack on Nigerian Christians posted earlier.
Thank you all for your kind attention to these issues.
MUST WATCH: Muslim sect in Italy promises global war and a massacre of millions leading to an Islamic world
For the details on this, please see RAIR Foundation
Video is about eight minutes.