Category Archives: Freedom of conscience

UK now so Orwellian even meta data about truth too dangerous for the British to mention

Posted on by

Meta data is information about information.

For example:

A guy commits a crime, and the police suspect it was him, but don’t have a warrant to tap his phone. So they check the available meta data on his phone such as who called, when did they call, and for how long. They can’t hear the conversation, but they can know that say, his mother called at the time of the crime and he didn’t answer, when he normally always answers and they talk for over 20 minutes. But this time he didn’t pick up at all or his phone was off.

With this and similar kinds of meta data, they can get a warrant to do whatever more intrusive searches they want.

When it comes to Muslims committing acts of terrorism or major crimes, we here in Dar al Harb have learned to use meta data to know the motives and nature of these events.

Back in the early days of the jihad on us all, we would hear that a man named Mohammad or a variation of same, would say, randomly stab a bunch of people in the neck while yelling the Arabic Phrase, “Allah hu ackbar”. We were not told this was an act of Islamic jihad, but eventually even the slowest picked up on it.

Then, they stopped telling is the name of the perp. If it was a Muslim name, we knew. That little bit of meta data as enough for us to have forbidden information. It was a Muslim killing random infidels as his religion commands him to do. So they stopped telling us the name, usually for several days or a week till any proper outrage had passed and there was no fear of anyone doing anything effective to stop the mass importation of Jihadis into Western nations.

They also stopped telling us that people yelled allah hu ackbar while committing these acts. Witnesses would be suppressed. Then they would start to not just lie by omission, but lie of fabrication. A dozen years or so ago, the media, facing ever more ludicrous rules from communist organizations like the National Union of Journalists, would create special rules for reporting on what they called “minorities”. Which seldom means minorities, but always means anyone but a white male had to be ‘protected’ such that people might not form a negative opinion about a hostile group before that group was too powerful to control us all. So they started claiming that the jihadi was mentally ill. They would report that the attacker, who usually followed koranic instructions for killing infidels to the letter was mentally ill before they even claimed to know his name. So somehow, they got his medical records unsealed within an hour and without even knowing who it was.

At that point they didn’t care that we knew they were lying to us. There was bugger all we could do about it.

Nonetheless, those of us who cared to know the truth carried on, interpreting meta data into reality as we could. When we heard a nameless person entered a church and cut the head off of a priest for instance, and wrote something in a foreign language, we knew it was a Muslim waging jihad against the infidel in the land of the infidels.

The next big squeeze on what we could know and say came when a Muslim waging jihad on the infidel stabbed something like 11 little girls at a Taylor Swift dance party killing three of them in Southport England. The lies of omissions started. He was a good boy from somewhere in Wales.People who correctly said it was an act of Islamic jihad found themselves sentenced to a year and a half in prison. The public got the message. We cannot interpret the meta data of Islamic jihad as such, or we will be destroyed.

Please watch the whole video below, produced by a regular fellow in the UK trying to describe what is obviously an act of jihad where a nurse was stabbed so badly she is described as having life changing injuries.

This the scariest video out of the UK in many ways. The fact that the public is now so Orwelled, for lack of a better term, that they know they may not speak aloud the truth if it contradicts state narratives, and narratives who’s intent is to destroy every aspect of them, is horrifying.

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” -George Orwell. 1984

 

Three items concerning freedom of speech, something which likely won’t even exist as a concept soon

Posted on by

First, let me preface this little collection of items with a simple concept.

Freedom of speech as a concept was invented for one thing and one thing only. The right to criticize or mock or say what we like about political and religious authority. Without that, we have no freedoms at all. Not even to criticize something as benign as women’s fashion. Which in Afghanistan is already non existent and is disappearing here as well. Islam is both a religious and political system. So they are fighting tooth and nail to stop any criticism of it in every way they can think of. And it has worked and continues to work at more and more levels of our civilization.

See if you can find a common denominator in these three items:

Number one: an Article from RAIR Foundation with the accompanying video below on the threat Islam poses to freedom of speech in the US

Secondly, in Canada, constitutional lawyers are fighting various new restrictions named in an Orwellian manner as ‘anti-bullying’ when in fact it is bullies creating and enforcing it for their own protection from criticism.

Lastly, a short compilation of contemporary tyrants explaining why you must not be allowed to challenge state narratives.

From the essay that accompanies the novel, 1984 on Newspeak. This could be seen as occurring today in Islam with respect to the words, justice, where it means sharia, or freedom. Which means to implement the sharia. But in terms of Western political freedom, you decide if the direction is headed towards the excerpt below:

 Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and
often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could
properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the
possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly
by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable
words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and
so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever. To give a single
example. The word FREE still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be
used in such statements as 'This dog is free from lice' or 'This field is
free from weeds'. It could not be used in its old sense of 'politically
free' or 'intellectually free' since political and intellectual freedom no
longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless.

Interview with Canadian veteran, Jeff Evely on how Canada repaid him for his service

Posted on by

This is basically a 2 part interview. The first part deals with his time at the Freedom Convoy, and subsequent arrests and government over-reactions. The second part starting at around 25 minutes in, discusses how the state convinced his child to undergo procedures to change the outward appearance of her body to resemble the other sex more or less.

The writeup is at RAIR.

Tamara Lich and Chris barber do audience Q&A in Ottawa, Aug. 18

Posted on by

We had the honour of sitting in and filming two genuine Canadian heroes this week. Heroes in that they have taken an unreasonable amount of state suffering on behalf of Canadian liberties and basic human rights, and genuine in both sense. Genuine heroes, and genuine people.

Some of the questions and answers are quite startling. For instance, the Crown, as we call it in Canada but it means the state, have managed to parley a mischief charge which should be equivalent to a minor act of vandalism such as spray-painting a wall, into a major offence which is equivalent to a charge of murder. The state is asking for a 10 year prison term for being involved with the Freedom Convoy in 2021. And yes, the trial is still going on. Even this week.

The good news is they feel that the judge, unlike the Helen Grus hearings, is an honest actor and is doing her best to hear all the evidence and appears to be treating it all in an even handed way. This was very nice to hear in answer to a question from RAIR Foundation.

Please do give this a listen and spread it around. This is not a small issue. What happens to them is beyond the horror to them of course, should they be imprisoned, also indicative of the state of Canada, and the right to object to government policies. Even ones which are illegal and a direct contradiction to our charter rights, natural law of course, and Bill of rights along with other laws such as the Nuremberg Code, signed on to by Canada in 1950.

[As usual for all Rumble videos, please click the little gear once the video starts playing and select the highest quality it offers you for best viewing enjoyment]

2013: BBC clip on death for blasphemy laws implemented in Bangladesh

Posted on by

This was in 2013. Death for criticism of Islam or its founder, the pirate Mohammad, is central dogma in Islamic scripture and sharia law. As Muslims become more numerous around the world, the decrease in freedom of speech is becoming obvious already. And while some countries have blasphemy of Islam laws disguised within “hate-speech” laws, most nations avoid speaking truthfully about Islam where muslims are numerous because Muslims will simply kill you themselves. This was the case quite often, certainly in France and the UK, but quite possibly in Denmark over two cartoonists and other less famous examples.

But one only needs to remember the Danish Cartoon Crisis which really began the suppression of freedom of speech in the West, if Salmon Rushdie wasn’t enough of an alarm clock.

The end game is what you see below. And it will happen here. As noted, for many it already has. Just ask anyone who worked at Charlie Hebdo. Or Samual Patty. 

Full hearings on weaponization of gov’t against freedom of speech with RFK Jr.

Posted on by

Tulsi Gabbard has a thing or two to say about the subject

Retired Police Officer Vincent Gircys Testimony | Toronto Day 3 | National Citizens Inquiry

Posted on by

This veteran police officer details the events leading up to the Freedom Convoy and what happened to him, including a fine of ten thousand dollars for attending a Church Service. Watch this to understand the real nature of the Canadian state as an authoritarian polity. This is also and important video.

Dr. Mary O’Connor speech in Ottawa, September 17th, 2022

Posted on by

This is the speech Dr. O’Connor gave on World Wide Walkout day, September 17th, 2022 across from Parliament Hill, Ottawa. You can read more on Mary’s story here and if you don’t already know, how vicious and thuggish even institutions like the various Canadian Colleges of Surgeons and Physicians have become since Covid, this will give some indication.

The EU’s planned mass surveillance state, coming to a smart city near you

Posted on by

Please go to RAIR for the story details. And do not for a moment think this isn’t planned for as much of the world as they can force it on. What did you think, “Smart Cities” and “Strong Cities” meant after all?

The one constant in all the crisis of the past few decades, is the move to tyranny

Posted on by

From Nuclear Winter to the current conflict in Ukraine, the one constant has been, in it’s original meaning, “political correctness.”

First, let’s visit what that term actually means:

(Youtube has now age restricted this video, and made it not playable outside of their site. This should tell us all a great deal, and also recognize it as a data-point that Whittle is correct)

The one truly consistent thing in all these events has been that you may not contradict the official narrative on the stated position on each one of these ‘crisis’. As we all know who may grace these pages:

With the left, the point is never the point, and the revolution is always the point.

With Global Warming, we all saw and continue to see, that any attempt to counter the scientisim of global warming with actual data and real science, will be met with cancelation. Perhaps we didn’t pay quite as much attention to it at the time as it was a thin strata of society that was being destroyed for offering reality on climate. And after all, didn’t we all to a degree think it might lead to policies that would be good for the environment? Of course, it wouldn’t as policies created on fictions can never make anything better. But a lot of people thought it would.

Meanwhile a lot of real scientists got destroyed for putting forth actual climate reality. Which made it quite satisfying when the hockey stick graph guy, Micheal Mann went to court against Mark Steyn and lost. If I recall correctly, he wouldn’t even present the data he used to make the graph so the Judge had to call it for Steyn.

Here is the Democrat propaganda magazine, The Atlantic attempting to tell the opposite story.

But most scientists who didn’t push the phoney climate scam would just never get a grant or be denied any kind of work in the field.

Let’s look at one of the top NASA scientists before he discovered this and after:

Flash forward to the start of Covid. There was an entire series of narratives that you could not dare contradict. Everything from the origins as being from bat soup in Wuhan, to the danger of it which must be as fearsome as possible in order to drive more narratives like lockdowns and masks and then of course, the many lies surrounding the experimental mRNA injections. In all cases and at all times you had to support or at least not contradict the official narratives as represented at any given time, by the government-media, and social-media conglomerate, all in lock step about how we must think about each aspect of each thing at every and any given time.

“The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.” -Orwell, 1984

Even now there are letters and communications circulating by the Ontario government telling medical staff to contact any patient who has not taken the goo and coerce them into it. Doctors who said anything true about the vaccines which might cause “vaccine hesitancy” risked losing their licences to practice medicine. In one case, a doctor in BC was committed to a mental facility and treated rather badly inside. This was because he told the truth about miscarriages of women who had taken the shot.

An Ottawa doctor had his practice raided by police and all his patient files taken after he closed his practice because he didn’t think the mRNA shots where a good idea. He said so in a letter he sent to his patients after he closed his practice.

(Anyone thinking Ontario is loosening up on Covid measures should read that letter and rethink that position)

And now, skipping over a dozen major government lies and Orwellian techniques to force compliance to a narrative and crush actual reality for its citizenry, we have the Russia-Ukraine conflict. One war in I dunno how many in the last 20 years. And certainly not the first one they lied about to gin up public support. Remember the focus grouping they did to get the story about babies being thrown out of incubators to get people behind the first war against Iraq? And that was because Kuwait was diagonally drilling under the Iraqi border to steal oil and the US government gave Iraq permission to attack Kuwait.

You might not find this online, but like Winston Smith in 1984, I remember seeing an interview with the woman-Ambassador to Iraq, who said on TV that she spoke with the White House and they had OK’d the attack on Kuwait by Saddam.

So how deep is the narrative on Russia-Ukraine?

Check out Facebook’s new policy on death threats…

Reuters:

Facebook temporarily allows posts on Ukraine war calling for violence against invading Russians or Putin’s death

March 10 (Reuters) – Meta Platforms (FB.O) will allow Facebook and Instagram users in some countries to call for violence against Russians and Russian soldiers in the context of the Ukraine invasion, according to internal emails seen by Reuters on Thursday, in a temporary change to its hate speech policy.

The social media company is also temporarily allowing some posts that call for death to Russian President Vladimir Putin or Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko in countries including Russia, Ukraine and Poland, according to internal emails to its content moderators.

“As a result of the Russian invasion of Ukraine we have temporarily made allowances for forms of political expression that would normally violate our rules like violent speech such as ‘death to the Russian invaders.’ We still won’t allow credible calls for violence against Russian civilians,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement.

The calls for the leaders’ deaths will be allowed unless they contain other targets or have two indicators of credibility, such as the location or method, one email said, in a recent change to the company’s rules on violence and incitement.

(If someone called for Zuckerberg or Trudeau or Biden’s death, I think we all know what would happen to them. And pretty damn fast.)

So hate speech is every bit as fungible as we all knew it was going to be. In no way was it going to be a consistent policy to make for a better world in some way. It was always meant to be a tool of absolute government control of what we are allowed to say and think at any given moment, and that policy would be highly selective and subject to change without notice.

Meanwhile, hatred and violence is being encouraged against uninvolved Russian anythings.

Members of Russian Community Centre rocked by vandalism, many have close ties to Ukraine

Members of the Russian Community Centre in Kitsilano are reeling after a case of vandalism as many of them have friends and relatives who have been displaced by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, says the centre’s board chair.

“What happened with the paint situation really impacted a lot of our members. It was like a slap in the face” at an already emotional time, said Ariadna McKenna.

“We all have many (people) in Ukraine and Russia that we have been in touch with, trying to find out if they are OK, if they are able to get out.”

The centre was started by a wave of immigrants to Vancouver who escaped tyranny by fleeing Russia in the 1950s. Over the years, it has aimed to help uphold traditions related to food and culture, said McKenna.

It wasn’t that long ago that we made damn sure that people did not lash out at anyone they could identify as being symbolically connected to a group. We sure as hell would never have permitted any action against a Saudi target when the Kashogi affair was all over the papers.

Hatred seems to be the weapon of choice for the newly minted communist countries of the West. They are all about hatred. They coax and encourage it when it moves the culture towards obedience like the mRNA shot compliance, and accuse people who simply do not want to be controlled, of being haters, Nazis, any kind of imputation of the forbidden emotion. Even as Trudeau and his deputy is caught in bed with actual Nazis in Ukraine.

I suppose it’s time I got to the point.

ALL of this, from Global warming, to Russia-Ukraine and everything in between, each and every crisis, most of which was either fabricated, or exaggerated to the point of fabrication, has been to force the abandonment of individuality, the destruction of representative democracy, of autonomy of regions, and even the very concept of the individual as a thing. The obliteration and the total application of white-out to even the memory of the individual as a thing of rights and of value.

With each phoney crisis, the cost of defying the official narrative grows higher. Hell if you supported a legal protest by donating to it or even feeding the protestors, you could have yourself found guilty of a crime RETROACTIVELY and without due process. You will also be punished without due process. Something like 270 people, according to a Trucker protest organizer I spoke with, still have their bank accounts frozen. You could have your business permanently closed. The state, municipal or federal, can seize your property.

So much for ending the State of Emergency.

This is about controlling what you can say, think and do at all times, and in the most pure Orwellian form, subject to change at any time, and find yourself punished for failure without any recourse to law, or reality.

With the left the point is never the point. The revolution is always the point.

Each one of these crisis has created a set of policies which limits our freedom and rights. All these policies are designed to move the culture to the left. The crisis that created the environment which made the public accept these new loss of rights was the point. Not whatever it is they are pointing at on TV.

For a proper understanding of this, please consider reading some of the papers at:

https://unconstrainedanalytics.org and especially this one: https://unconstrainedanalytics.org/report-re-remembering-the-mis-remembered-left-the-lefts-strategy-and-tactics-to-transform-america/

God help us all.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.

ERATA: The law suit that has been settled appears to be between Hockey stick graph guy, Mann, and paleo-climatologist, Dr. Tim Ball. The Steyn case is still ongoing after all these years, which is horrifying in terms of what it means for justice in Canada.

 

What exactly does the term, “Weasel Words” mean? Lets ask the FBI

Posted on by

I hear the term, “Weasel Words” thrown around these days like I heard the term, “paradigm” in the 90s, or how every sentence started with the word “so” around 2015.

Then someone sent me this video which makes it perfectly clear exactly what the term means. I would like to thank the FBI for the excellent example of it, and Ed Snowdon for the clarity on the issue.

HT ML.

Another excellent example of the term, Weasel Words”.

https://twitter.com/Vladtepesblog/status/1369814416716398592?s=20

Notice how this phrase from Statistics Canada says: “Indirect impacts” when what they really refer to are the consequences of government policy implemented with the excuse of Covid. A brilliant example of Weasel Words.

France: Muslim decapitates a teacher for showing a drawing of the founder of Islam, Mohammad, in class

Posted on by

 ‘Parent shouting Allahu Akbar’ beheads Paris teacher ‘for showing pupils cartoons of the Prophet in class’: Terrorist is then shot dead by cops following chase

A parent shouting Allahu Akbar and thought to be wearing an explosive vest has been shot dead by French police near Paris after allegedly beheading a school teacher with a knife.

The victim was said to have been a school teacher who had enraged parents by displaying cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed to pupils.

A source told Le Parisien: ‘The victim had recently given a lesson to his students on freedom of expression and had shown the caricatures of Muhammad’.

This led to an enraged parent confronting the teacher with a kitchen knife, and then cutting his head off, said the source.

The first bloodbath took place in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, a suburb some 25 miles from the centre of the French capital on Friday.

French anti-terror prosecutors confirmed they were investigating an assault in which a man was decapitated on the outskirts of Paris.

This post will be updated with materials as we get them prepared. Meanwhile check the Reader’s Links comments for today to see a LOT more on this now.