Please go to RAIR for the story details. And do not for a moment think this isn’t planned for as much of the world as they can force it on. What did you think, “Smart Cities” and “Strong Cities” meant after all?
From Nuclear Winter to the current conflict in Ukraine, the one constant has been, in it’s original meaning, “political correctness.”
First, let’s visit what that term actually means:
(Youtube has now age restricted this video, and made it not playable outside of their site. This should tell us all a great deal, and also recognize it as a data-point that Whittle is correct)
The one truly consistent thing in all these events has been that you may not contradict the official narrative on the stated position on each one of these ‘crisis’. As we all know who may grace these pages:
With the left, the point is never the point, and the revolution is always the point.
With Global Warming, we all saw and continue to see, that any attempt to counter the scientisim of global warming with actual data and real science, will be met with cancelation. Perhaps we didn’t pay quite as much attention to it at the time as it was a thin strata of society that was being destroyed for offering reality on climate. And after all, didn’t we all to a degree think it might lead to policies that would be good for the environment? Of course, it wouldn’t as policies created on fictions can never make anything better. But a lot of people thought it would.
Meanwhile a lot of real scientists got destroyed for putting forth actual climate reality. Which made it quite satisfying when the hockey stick graph guy, Micheal Mann went to court against Mark Steyn and lost. If I recall correctly, he wouldn’t even present the data he used to make the graph so the Judge had to call it for Steyn.
Here is the Democrat propaganda magazine, The Atlantic attempting to tell the opposite story.
But most scientists who didn’t push the phoney climate scam would just never get a grant or be denied any kind of work in the field.
Let’s look at one of the top NASA scientists before he discovered this and after:
NASA’s climate scientist Dr James Hansen @DrJamesEHansen
Evolved from scientist to pseudoscientist in 5 years.
Who got to him and what did they offer him to turn his back on the scientific method?
— ????????™ ????? Climate of Dawn (@DawnTJ90) March 9, 2022
Flash forward to the start of Covid. There was an entire series of narratives that you could not dare contradict. Everything from the origins as being from bat soup in Wuhan, to the danger of it which must be as fearsome as possible in order to drive more narratives like lockdowns and masks and then of course, the many lies surrounding the experimental mRNA injections. In all cases and at all times you had to support or at least not contradict the official narratives as represented at any given time, by the government-media, and social-media conglomerate, all in lock step about how we must think about each aspect of each thing at every and any given time.
“The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.” -Orwell, 1984
Even now there are letters and communications circulating by the Ontario government telling medical staff to contact any patient who has not taken the goo and coerce them into it. Doctors who said anything true about the vaccines which might cause “vaccine hesitancy” risked losing their licences to practice medicine. In one case, a doctor in BC was committed to a mental facility and treated rather badly inside. This was because he told the truth about miscarriages of women who had taken the shot.
An Ottawa doctor had his practice raided by police and all his patient files taken after he closed his practice because he didn’t think the mRNA shots where a good idea. He said so in a letter he sent to his patients after he closed his practice.
(Anyone thinking Ontario is loosening up on Covid measures should read that letter and rethink that position)
And now, skipping over a dozen major government lies and Orwellian techniques to force compliance to a narrative and crush actual reality for its citizenry, we have the Russia-Ukraine conflict. One war in I dunno how many in the last 20 years. And certainly not the first one they lied about to gin up public support. Remember the focus grouping they did to get the story about babies being thrown out of incubators to get people behind the first war against Iraq? And that was because Kuwait was diagonally drilling under the Iraqi border to steal oil and the US government gave Iraq permission to attack Kuwait.
You might not find this online, but like Winston Smith in 1984, I remember seeing an interview with the woman-Ambassador to Iraq, who said on TV that she spoke with the White House and they had OK’d the attack on Kuwait by Saddam.
So how deep is the narrative on Russia-Ukraine?
Check out Facebook’s new policy on death threats…
March 10 (Reuters) – Meta Platforms (FB.O) will allow Facebook and Instagram users in some countries to call for violence against Russians and Russian soldiers in the context of the Ukraine invasion, according to internal emails seen by Reuters on Thursday, in a temporary change to its hate speech policy.
The social media company is also temporarily allowing some posts that call for death to Russian President Vladimir Putin or Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko in countries including Russia, Ukraine and Poland, according to internal emails to its content moderators.
“As a result of the Russian invasion of Ukraine we have temporarily made allowances for forms of political expression that would normally violate our rules like violent speech such as ‘death to the Russian invaders.’ We still won’t allow credible calls for violence against Russian civilians,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement.
The calls for the leaders’ deaths will be allowed unless they contain other targets or have two indicators of credibility, such as the location or method, one email said, in a recent change to the company’s rules on violence and incitement.
(If someone called for Zuckerberg or Trudeau or Biden’s death, I think we all know what would happen to them. And pretty damn fast.)
So hate speech is every bit as fungible as we all knew it was going to be. In no way was it going to be a consistent policy to make for a better world in some way. It was always meant to be a tool of absolute government control of what we are allowed to say and think at any given moment, and that policy would be highly selective and subject to change without notice.
Meanwhile, hatred and violence is being encouraged against uninvolved Russian anythings.
Members of the Russian Community Centre in Kitsilano are reeling after a case of vandalism as many of them have friends and relatives who have been displaced by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, says the centre’s board chair.
“What happened with the paint situation really impacted a lot of our members. It was like a slap in the face” at an already emotional time, said Ariadna McKenna.
“We all have many (people) in Ukraine and Russia that we have been in touch with, trying to find out if they are OK, if they are able to get out.”
The centre was started by a wave of immigrants to Vancouver who escaped tyranny by fleeing Russia in the 1950s. Over the years, it has aimed to help uphold traditions related to food and culture, said McKenna.
It wasn’t that long ago that we made damn sure that people did not lash out at anyone they could identify as being symbolically connected to a group. We sure as hell would never have permitted any action against a Saudi target when the Kashogi affair was all over the papers.
Hatred seems to be the weapon of choice for the newly minted communist countries of the West. They are all about hatred. They coax and encourage it when it moves the culture towards obedience like the mRNA shot compliance, and accuse people who simply do not want to be controlled, of being haters, Nazis, any kind of imputation of the forbidden emotion. Even as Trudeau and his deputy is caught in bed with actual Nazis in Ukraine.
I suppose it’s time I got to the point.
ALL of this, from Global warming, to Russia-Ukraine and everything in between, each and every crisis, most of which was either fabricated, or exaggerated to the point of fabrication, has been to force the abandonment of individuality, the destruction of representative democracy, of autonomy of regions, and even the very concept of the individual as a thing. The obliteration and the total application of white-out to even the memory of the individual as a thing of rights and of value.
With each phoney crisis, the cost of defying the official narrative grows higher. Hell if you supported a legal protest by donating to it or even feeding the protestors, you could have yourself found guilty of a crime RETROACTIVELY and without due process. You will also be punished without due process. Something like 270 people, according to a Trucker protest organizer I spoke with, still have their bank accounts frozen. You could have your business permanently closed. The state, municipal or federal, can seize your property.
So much for ending the State of Emergency.
This is about controlling what you can say, think and do at all times, and in the most pure Orwellian form, subject to change at any time, and find yourself punished for failure without any recourse to law, or reality.
With the left the point is never the point. The revolution is always the point.
Each one of these crisis has created a set of policies which limits our freedom and rights. All these policies are designed to move the culture to the left. The crisis that created the environment which made the public accept these new loss of rights was the point. Not whatever it is they are pointing at on TV.
For a proper understanding of this, please consider reading some of the papers at:
https://unconstrainedanalytics.org and especially this one: https://unconstrainedanalytics.org/report-re-remembering-the-mis-remembered-left-the-lefts-strategy-and-tactics-to-transform-america/
God help us all.
Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.
ERATA: The law suit that has been settled appears to be between Hockey stick graph guy, Mann, and paleo-climatologist, Dr. Tim Ball. The Steyn case is still ongoing after all these years, which is horrifying in terms of what it means for justice in Canada.
I hear the term, “Weasel Words” thrown around these days like I heard the term, “paradigm” in the 90s, or how every sentence started with the word “so” around 2015.
Then someone sent me this video which makes it perfectly clear exactly what the term means. I would like to thank the FBI for the excellent example of it, and Ed Snowdon for the clarity on the issue.
FBI >> We are NOT trying to get encryption backdoors, we are trying to get LEGAL ACCESS TO INFORMATION….FROM THE BACK…THROUGH A DOOR … get your facts right! pic.twitter.com/eTxHNF48EK
— ?silla ?rimer (@CryptoTweetie) March 10, 2021
Another excellent example of the term, Weasel Words”.
"Indirect effects". Another great example of the term, weasel words, as they try and avoid saying consequences of government policy.
— Vlad Tepesblog (@Vladtepesblog) March 11, 2021
Notice how this phrase from Statistics Canada says: “Indirect impacts” when what they really refer to are the consequences of government policy implemented with the excuse of Covid. A brilliant example of Weasel Words.
A parent shouting Allahu Akbar and thought to be wearing an explosive vest has been shot dead by French police near Paris after allegedly beheading a school teacher with a knife.
The victim was said to have been a school teacher who had enraged parents by displaying cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed to pupils.
A source told Le Parisien: ‘The victim had recently given a lesson to his students on freedom of expression and had shown the caricatures of Muhammad’.
This led to an enraged parent confronting the teacher with a kitchen knife, and then cutting his head off, said the source.
The first bloodbath took place in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, a suburb some 25 miles from the centre of the French capital on Friday.
French anti-terror prosecutors confirmed they were investigating an assault in which a man was decapitated on the outskirts of Paris.
This post will be updated with materials as we get them prepared. Meanwhile check the Reader’s Links comments for today to see a LOT more on this now.
Below, Part I of Micheal Hansen’s Killing Free Speech:
My interview with Cyril on February 27, 2018.
This appears to be the video that prompted the new interview above:
Please see this correction to the translation that was sent in today for this video above:
at 1:33 it is the journalist that says affirmatively : “… écouter aussi évidemment… ”the nuance here would be …” but evidently you will also have to listen to what those are saying, don’t you ? “the “dont’ you ? “part is not expressed by words but by the intonationand to that trudeau answers “… oui , mais surveiller “and that would be ” yes … but to monitor (them) ”
If that isn’t clear, lets look at these clips to add mental context:
I think this is actually 2016…
Here is a popular Quebec TV host discussing this newest shove to Orwell out of Trudeau’s mouth:
On Thursday, 25 October the ECHR ruled that my conviction by an Austrian court for discussing the marriage between Prophet Mohammed and a six year old girl, Aisha, did not infringe my rights of freedom of speech.
I was not extended the courtesy of being told of this ruling. Like many others, I had to read it in the media.
The ECHR found there had been no violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights and that right to expression needed to be balanced with the rights of others to have their religious feelings protected, and served the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace in Austria.
In other words, my right to speak freely is less important than protecting the religious feelings of others.
This should ring warning bells for my fellow citizens across the continent. We should all be extremely concerned that the rights of Muslims in Europe NOT to be offended are greater than my own rights, as a native European Christian woman, to speak freely.
I am proud to be the woman who has raised this alarm.
I am also optimistic. Since giving my seminars in Austria in 2009, we have come a very long way.
Ten years ago the press labeled me a “confused doom-monger” and I was compared to Osama Bin Laden. Now, Islam is being discussed in every sphere of life and people are waking up to the reality of a culture so opposed to our own.
The cultural and political threat posed by Islam to Western societies is now widely recognized and discussed. It is fair to say European society, as well as the political realm, is undergoing an enlightenment, as it is more awake than ever to the need to defend our own Judeo-Christian culture.
I believe my seminars in 2009, and subsequent work have contributed to strong push back against an Islamic culture which is so at odds with our own. And note with interest that only one sentence out of 12 hours of seminars on Islam was a prosecutable offense. I assume the remaining content is now officially sanctioned by our Establishment masters.
It is obvious to me that public education and discourse on the subject of Islam can have a fundamental and far-reaching impact, even if our state or supra-national authorities try to stifle or silence it, in order to appease a culture so foreign to our own.
This fight continues. My voice will not and cannot be silenced.
(To support ESW please go to en.savefreespeech.org)