Category Archives: Selective enforcement

The joke of ‘secure Britain’: Vile banned militant extremist strolls through Heathrow immigration as 200 Somalian criminals are allowed to stay due to human rights

Posted on by
  • Free to walk the streets, asylum seeker thieves and drug dealers

By Jack Doyle

From The Daily Mail:

Last updated at 12:21 AM on 29th June 2011

 

Impunity: Banned radical extremist Raad Salah walking free in the streets of Leicester yesterdayImpunity: Banned radical extremist Raed Salah walking free in the streets of Leicester yesterday

 

Britain’s powerlessness to control who has the right to be in this country was glaringly exposed last night by two extraordinary cases.

In the first, an anti-Semitic preacher of hate whom the Home Secretary had banned from entering Britain was able to stroll in through Heathrow.

Last night, Raed Salah was giving a lecture organised by Islamist radicals to a large crowd in Leicester, and today he was due to speak at Westminster at the invitation of Left-wing Labour MPs.

In the second, a bombshell ruling by European judges blocked the deportation of some 200 Somali criminals back to their homeland.

The Strasbourg court said the men, including drug dealers and serial burglars, might be persecuted in war-torn Somalia, and that they must be allowed to stay to protect their human rights.

So, irrespective of how  heinous their crimes or the danger they present to the public, Britain has no power to expel them. Continue Reading →

Woman’s leg broken, others hurt in Spring Garden mob attack

Posted on by

Here is an interesting story. A mob attacks women and other people, and there is not one adjective about the attackers other than there appears to have been around 100 of them. Is this journalism? Have we really gotten to the point where media has decided for us all what we are not allowed to know in case we form opinions based on facts that might be politically inconvenient? Why do I think if they were mostly middle class white kids from Christian backgrounds we would have video, photos and names by now? Below, a paragraph or two of the story but click over and read the whole thing to get a sense of the scope of the lack of information.

A WOMAN’S leg was broken and several other people were injured Saturday night when a large group of teens accosted pedestrians in Spring Garden, police and witnesses said.

Philadelphia police responded to two reports of pedestrians being assaulted by a large group of young people along Broad Street about 9:30 p.m.

One of those reports came from Emily Guendelsberger, 27, city editor for local arts and entertainment content for the Onion, the satirical newspaper and website. She was walking with seven friends on Green Street near Broad when they were accosted, she said. Guendelsberger, who remained hospitalized with a broken leg yesterday, declined to comment further.

 

 

 

CAIR-CAN steps in as twelfth player on the field.

Posted on by

CAIR-CAN, Canada’s leading Muslim grievance outfit and law-fare outreach group, has decided to carry the torch on behalf of hijab wearing soccer referee Sarah Benkirane.

CAIR-CAN believes that FIFA rules should have no jurisdiction on Canadian soccer fields when it comes to the choice of cultural dress (it has been well established, even by Muslim scholars, that the Hijab is not mandatory religious garb).

But what I find the most interesting in this article is the quote “Upholding this ban sends the message to young people that what matters not are your skills but whether or not you fit a predetermined ‘look’.” Very curious indeed coming from a totalitarian ideology that demands, more than any other group, just how people are required to ‘look’.

How about this instead: By challenging this rule, CAIR-CAN sends the message to young people that it is not what resides in your heart that determines your piety, but rather what resides on your head!

Father Grace

CAIR-CAN Denounces Discrimination Against Muslim Ref and Sikh Soccer Player

Tuesday, June 21, 2011 1:32 pm

 

– For Immediate Release –

(Ottawa, Canada – June 21, 2011) – The Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-CAN), a national Muslim civil rights organization, today called the decision by the Quebec Soccer Federation (QSF) to ban a Muslim referee, Sarah Benkirane, 15, and a Sikh player, Sagerpreet Singh, from respectively refereeing and participating if they maintain their religious dress, a violation of Canada’s various human rights codes. In making this decision, the QSF cited the rules set forth by the world’s governing body FIFA, which forbids wearing anything of a religious nature on the pitch. Continue Reading →

Hijab on the pitch.

Posted on by

Here we go again. A Canadian makes a personal choice to follow a religion. She then chooses to participate in a public activity whose mandate clearly stipulates that all must abide by set regulations. She chooses to agree to those regulations. She then however, on behalf of her religion, chooses to break those established rules and yet expects that those rules should be changed to accommodate her.

So now, as if the rules she earlier agreed upon are somehow arbitrary and unnecessary, she preys upon our tolerance and goodwill in an attempt to break down the very freedoms that afford her the opportunity to choose in the first place.

I have no doubt that given the choice, should there have been a majority of Muslims within the league, it would be mandatory for all female participants to wear hijabs, regardless of their religion, with no apologies proffered. One has only to turn their attention to many swimming pools in major Canadian cities to see that, despite decades of hard fought battles to end gender discrimination, it is once again being re-instated in the name of sensitivity to Islamic demands (not to mention that basic rules of hygiene and safety are also being ignored under the pretence of cultural forbearance).

It is now time for us to clearly state and compel those values and the rules they stipulate to those who choose to reside within our society. Why? Because they are BETTER than those they wish to replace them with. There! I said it! So sue me!!

Father Grace

From The National Post.

Teen cut from team for wearing her hijab.

MONTREAL . A Quebec teenager who referees soccer games has been cut because she wears a hijab on the field.

Sarah Benkirane has been refereeing games on Montreal’s West Island and in Vaudreuil, Que., further west, for about two years, and was shocked last week to get a call from the Lac St. Louis Regional Soccer Association telling her she was fired.

“It seems so unfair,” said Ms. Benkirane, a 15-year-old Muslim who lives in Vaudreuil. “It’s always tucked into my shirt, it’s not hanging and it’s part of my religion. It doesn’t make any sense.” Continue Reading →

‘Baroness’ Warsi calls Melanie Phillips, “Mad Mel”

Posted on by

I thought this might be a good time to do some comparing. Here is the article where Warsi dares to call Melanie Phillips, ‘Mad’. If she meant angry, then she would of course be correct. Any sane British person should be good and angry at this point, their anger directly proportional to their sanity I would say. But I think she means ‘mad’ in the other sense. Bereft of reason. Let’s check that out. Here are some Phillips clips all from within the last year or so. Firefox users may have to click here to see the clip immediately below.

You need to install or upgrade Flash Player to view this content, install or upgrade by clicking here.

And another really excellent interview with Mel on Israeli TV:

And yet another where Melanie is called to task for calling the Itemar murderers, the people who butchered an entire Israeli family, man women, child and baby in their sleep, “savages”. Now if you can’t call that savage, then what exactly does the word mean, men who leave the toilet seat up?

Teachers reluctant to discuss 9/11

Posted on by

Islam once again manages to force the rest of the world to change historical, even contemporary historical fact and how it is taught to avoid ‘offending’ them in some way. Here is a thought. If Islam does not wish to be exposed as the ideology behind death, mass murder, destruction and retrograde actions to civilization, just get Muslims to stop doing all those things. Problem solved.

From The Telegraph:

Teachers are reluctant to discuss the September 11 attacks on America because they fear it will provoke racism and Islamaphobia in class, according to a survey.

By Stephen Adams

3:35PM BST 24 Jun 2011

Those in schools with high numbers of Muslim children are particularly concerned about talking about the atrocity – despite it being arguably the defining event of the 21st century so far.

Alison Kitson, faculty director at the Institute of Education at London University, which carried out the survey, said teachers should “grasp the nettle” and tackle the subject. They should credit children with more maturity, she said.

Four in five teachers (81 per cent) said that when teaching the topic, it was a challenge to break “students’ stereotypes and prejudices about other cultures”.

The academics polled almost 200 teachers across the country and also visited eight schools: four in London, and one each in Leeds, Worcestershire, Oxford and Surrey.

At two schools, teachers showed “serious resistance” to raising the subject, while in another there was “some resistance” from staff.

Teachers in schools with higher proportions of children from ethnic minority backgrounds were most against discussing 9/11. Continue Reading →

NYT and CNN to break international law and observe the results.

Posted on by

Now this is interesting. I appreciate good and courageous reporting but isn’t it illegal for a reporter to knowingly participate in a crime for the purpose of observing it? I mean if I planned to burgle a house and called the NYT to come along, would they send a reporter? Or call the police? At what point does it become, not-a-crime, even when it is one to these people? The blockade of Gaza is 100% legal and in accordance with international law and the Geneva convention. The deliberate attempt to breach it, doubly so because Gaza is not in need of any supplies unless you count much better weapons as humanitarian aid, is a crime. Media participation makes them accessories to a crime of international law.

Eeyore for Vlad.

h/t Tundra Tabloids especially for the picture:


NY Times, CNN to Travel Aboard Flotilla

Alana Goodman 06.21.2011 – 3:46 PM

Journalists from a variety of news outlets – including the New York Times and full camera crews from CNN, CBS – will be covering the anti-Israel flotilla from aboard one of the ships, according to The Nation correspondent Joseph Dana (who will also report from the flotilla).

While it’s hard to blame reporters for seeking out a colorful story, they should realize by joining the activists on the boat they are actually making themselves a part of the story. They will be with the flotilla when it attempts to violate international law by trying to break Israel’s legally-established naval blockade. And they could potentially interfere with the Israeli military’s ability to do its job if IDF soldiers are forced to board the ships.

 

Wilders verdict tomorrow.

Posted on by

Lots of speculation on this one. According to this news source, he will be freed on all charges. Why am I not as optimistic?

h/t Snaphanen

 

Video site and how you can help

Posted on by

For a variety of reasons, probably as much bureaucratic incompetence as it is political correctness, the counter jihad cannot rely on youtube alone. I have already had the product of three years work closed on me, rightly or wrongly, and my new channel there has already received at least one strike for the most banal of videos.

 

 

 

The short video of an Egyptian teacher hitting all his students, except one, with a ruler was too much for youtube apparently. More than likely, Islamic groups know how to get a video removed. They attack the video using the reasoning of the PC left. A nice irony that must amuse them a great deal. This video, exposing how Muslim schools in Egypt today treat children earned me a strike on my account, and this means that the new channel is not long for this earth either.

Perhaps the best example of youtube failing to distinguish exposing hate speech from actual hate speech, is where I, with the aid of Dutch translators, subtitled a video showing a Dutch-Muslim rap band singing about killing all the Jews and infidels and the usual Islamic ambitions. My titled version, used to expose this kind of hatred to the light of day, earned me a strike and suspension while the original Dutch version which meant what it said, remained on youtube unmolested and untitled.

There is hope though. I have videos on several platforms and there is one that looks rather promising. I would ask that those who are interested please join the site and subscribe to the channel of the same name as this site. MRCT-TV seems to be a viable alternative, at least till Islamic and or leftist lawyers find a way to close it down as well as a viable alternative to youtube, but for the moment, go and have a look.

Burka Biatch out on bail. More to come on this one…

Posted on by

There will be a lot out today on Australia and the wonderful influence of Islam there. Lets begin with an update on the Oz-convert who was stopped by police for some routine infraction and formally accused the officer of racism, as she did not know he was recording the entire issue from his car-camera.

Now she has won an appeal and is out of jail for the false accusation because the judge agreed he could not be sure it was her, as of course, she was wearing a burka. Subsequent to all this, one of her own has sworn that it was indeed her. The police are appealing. More on her, him and his son a little later today.

Below the update and the original news clip:

Then we have a story which is eerily similar to the one above. This time, a friend of hers and his son are involved:

Notice anything familiar about the man?

Turns out the screaming Harpy under the black tent really was her as her associate swears is the case:

Ontario HRC reaches predictable heights

Posted on by

A few years ago, I decided to stop telling jokes of what I have come to call, ‘logical extremes’. What I mean is, someone tells you something absurd or counter intuitive and you answer with, “Wow next thing you know, you will have to hire a dead guy at your gym or be charged with discrimination against the metabolically challenged’. The reason I decided to stop telling them was because I had this awful albeit superstitious feeling that every-time I told one, I was handing some supercilious bureaucrat another data point on how to destroy liberty and control every thought we have.

Then I saw this:

Thanks Blazing, for religiously posting Ezra’s excellent clips. I may have to get cable again soon just for these.

Robert Kennedy Jr. “The Whole World Knows Geert Wilders is a Racist”

Posted on by

Here is a staggeringly good example of the politically correct left’s destruction of important and meaningful concepts and words. Racist of course already nearly means nothing thanks to the left’s forcing people to accept the notion that a group no matter how it is defined, whether it is by voluntary belief such as religion or sexual preference like homosexuality, is tantamount to race and any criticism of behaviors that may define these groups is consequently racist. Notice how Kennedy Jr. avoids answering any question on why Mr. Wilders is a racist, he simply insists that he is and that everyone knows he is. The usual dodge of the left.

 

‘ I don’t need to back up my name calling cause everyone (except everyone who doesn’t agree but they don’t count cause they are also racists) knows that its true.’

 

History will show that Geert Wilders did more for Gay rights, minority rights, intercultural tolerance and preservation of Western values than any other politician of this time while Kennedy and his ilk happily threw those who Islam oppresses ‘under the bus’ merely to attempt to preserve the populist narrative.

Eeyore for Vlad with thanks to KitmanTV for the clip of R. K.

Video of arrest of Vlaams Belang for symbolically changing a street sign

Posted on by

Here is the classically liberal Belgium separatist party being arrested. Details a few posts down. AFP like all the media, insist on calling Vlaams Belang, “Far Right Wing’. I would love to know what the criteria for that is, or for that matter what it even means beyond an attempt to besmirch them.

On the other hand, I think I can define fascism. That would be when the state crushes any opposing view to the one held by the powerful, by using instruments of the state out of all proportion to the activity which challenges them and the views they enforce. One example might be having people handcuffed and arrested and taken away in full view of mass media who merely did a publicity stunt with a non permanent sign on the side of a building when nothing was damaged and no one was harmed in any way. I think that might qualify as ‘fascist’. Now, how are we defining ‘far right’ again?