“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
Clearly politically correct governments and bureaucracies all over the western world have one standing order.
‘Create whatever laws and rules you want to, mobilize forces and fund any programs, do absolutely whatever you can and is visible to the general public so long as at all costs, you do not address any real problems or issues in any rational or meaningful way’
Amnesty International is filled with clueless morons.
I posted yesterday on the OIC’s campaign. Now AI is working hand in hand with the most totalitarian international organization in the world today. This is only to be expected, since AI couldn’t care less about human rights in the first place, they’re all about spreading an utopian statist ideology, which leads them to make stupid statements and launch moronic campaigns. No shocker there.
Gee, I wonder if AI knows that the OIC’s Ihsanoglu is a denier of Islamic/Muslim anti-Semitism? I doubt it, nor would they care.
a.i: European governments must do more to challenge the negative stereotypes and prejudices against Muslims fuelling discrimination especially in education and employment, a new report by Amnesty International reveals today.
“Muslim women are being denied jobs and girls prevented from attending regular classes just because they wear traditional forms of dress, such as the headscarf. Men can be dismissed for wearing beards associated with Islam,” said Marco Perolini, Amnesty International’s expert on discrimination.
“Rather than countering these prejudices, political parties and public officials are all too often pandering to them in their quest for votes.”
The report Choice and prejudice: discrimination against Muslims in Europe, exposes the impact of discrimination on the ground of religion or belief on Muslims in several aspects of their lives, including employment and education.
Spencer captures the BIG LIE that Amnesty International is gullibly going along with:
“Islamophobia” is a concept that was invented by the Muslim Brotherhood in order to intimidate non-Muslims away from criticizing or resisting the jihad and Islamic supremacism. The OIC has millions and will use them to bury us in hot steaming piles of nonsense about how Islam teaches peace and tolerance and “believe us, not your lying eyes.” They will use them also to continue to demonize and marginalize everyone who dares speak out in defense of human rights against Sharia. But there is one thing they will not do and could not do even if they wanted to: they will not stop jihad terror attacks committed in the name of Islam. They will not stop people from waving Qur’ans and shouting Allahu akbar before cold-bloodedly murdering innocent people, including children. And that is why their campaign, for all the money behind it, is doomed to fail. Their Big Lie is designed to obscure the Islamic motivations behind jihad terror, and to disarm resistance to jihad and Islamic supremacism, by blaring the Big Lie everywhere. But every day the truth will come out, somewhere, in the form of mangled bodies, terrified children, and horrified bystanders suddenly awakening to reality as they make their way on a ground slippery with blood.
Listen to this stunning BBC interview of E.D.L. 2IC, Kevin Carroll. Try and read though the news reports about Muslims arrested, tried or convicted for rape, terrorism and other forms of violent anti-social behavior while you listen to how the BBC treat the only classically liberal organization left in the UK at this time. (British Freedom Party not withstanding of course) To the BBC, somehow a march by the EDL against Islamic terror, rape and murder is “catastrophic’ but the constant string or pedophile rape gangs by Muslims who hold ‘unbeliever’ girls in utter contempt in every way is somehow not.
OIC’s Sec-Gen Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu would agree.
This was first published on Ynet, and is republished here with the author’s permission and with a bit longer text.
By Manfred Gerstenfeld
Politically correct European elites and many Muslims have jointly created the perception that all Muslims are victims of the West. Consistent flawed reasoning and false arguments have made this possible.
On the basis of the fake ‘victimhood’ platforms created over the years, whitewashers of the murderer Mohamed Merah are constructing new false images. It is difficult to deny that the three French soldiers, a Jewish teacher and three children whom he killed are victims. Once having paid tribute to them, whitewashers began to turn the brutal murderer into a victim as well.
Among the most intelligent Merah apologists is Tariq Ramadan, a Geneva-born Professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies at Oxford. He first whitewashed Muslim anti-Semite Merah’s worldview. He eloquently wrote that “Merah was a misguided youngster in whose thought there were no values of Islam or racist and anti-Semitic ideas.” The next step was to turn Merah into a victim. In Ramadan’s words, Merah was “a poor guy, guilty and to be condemned undoubtedly, even if he himself was a victim of a social order which had already condemned him and millions of others to a marginality and a non-recognition of his statute of citizen with equal rights and chances.”1 Ramadan thus transformed Merah into a non-racist, non- anti-Semitic victim of society, whose ideas had nothing to do with any Muslim current.
There is a very, very powerful essay over at Darren Greenfield’s blog comparing how and why Jewish children were hunted down and killed in France in the past, and how and why they are being so now.
There was a time when Jewish children were hunted down and killed in France. Their killers believed themselves to be members of a superior group that was destined to rule the world and enslave or exterminate members of inferior groups. The cowardice and appeasement of the French authorities allowed them to operate freely, to kill Jews and launch attacks on other countries.
What was then is now again. The occupying army doesn’t wear uniforms, it wears keffiyahs. It doesn’t speak German, it speaks Arabic. It doesn’t believe that it is superior for reasons of race as much as for reasons of religion. It does not view all others as Untermenschen, but as infidels. It looks forward not to a thousand year Reich, but to a thousand year Caliphate.
Mohammed Merah did not chase down a French-Jewish seven year old girl, put a gun to her head and pull the trigger because he came from an economically depressed area or any of the other media spin. He was only doing what Muslims had been doing to non-Muslims for over a thousand years. He didn’t do what he did because he was “radicalized”, he did it because he became a fully committed Muslim.
It won’t end with taking down one man and it won’t end with Jewish children. When your ideology believes that it is in a zero-sum struggle with the rest of the world and that membership means that you are a superior breed of human being because you worship the Fuhrer or Allah, then it won’t stop. It won’t ever stop. Not until the figurehead is toppled, the creed is humiliated and the supermen are shown to be cowards, neurotics, pedophiles, insecure men dressing up their weaknesses in power fantasies.
Between all the non-stop coverage, the expressions of grief, the political pandering, no one is stating the obvious. France has been occupied all over again. Once again the occupation has been carried out with the consent of the authorities who have decided that cowardice is the only way. Vichy France has become Vichy Europe, Vichy America, Vichy Australia, where the blatant appeasement is disguised as honor, treason is portrayed as responsible leadership and collaboration in the mass murder of your own people is never acknowledged as such…
…That simple undeniable fact is denied by government, in every university and in every center of culture. And every one of those deniers has blood on his hands.
Please click through to read the rest of this extremely important seminal piece.
Please have a look at this article on Jihad Watch for more on this:
A planned British Freedom Party event was cancelled last week after the venue’s manager was threatened by an organisation called Unite Against Fascism ( UAF ).
The UAF is a deeply unpleasant organisation, which quite astonishingly has been publicly endorsed by our Prime Minister and various MPs – including Conservative MP Sir Peter Bottomley.
The Daily Telegraph exposed some horrific facts about the UAF last week, so I wrote to Sir Peter Bottomley via email, to ask why both he and Cameron publicly endorsed such an extremist, anti-British and hateful organisation. His response was chilling.
******
Dear Sir Peter…
Once upon a time, the left was the most hysterical about women’s rights, both real ones and as often, synthetic rights which were impossible to address but are part and parcel of critical theory. Now, the left is throwing real rights, women’s and minorities and frankly everyones, under the bus as fast as possible to avoid telling the truth about Islam.
First picture, yesterdays headline of the Toronto star stating a factual aspect of the deal the Afghan ‘president’ made.
The above picture from Google cache grabbed by Tundra Tablods.
Below, todays headline for the exact same article:
How very shameful. The Toronto Star enjoyed a brief moment of the former glory of supporting real human rights. Of exposing tyranny and speaking truth to power and more typically, truth to ultra-conservative religious tyranny. Now, like the rest of the media (SUN NEWS NETWORK excepted) The Star has weakened its headline to avoid offending the greatest threat to women, minority, and for that matter all human rights and beneficiaries of the Enlightenment, Islam.
I love these guys.
Enjoy
WARNING: Language and some nudity
Just felt I had to do this.
In the intellectuals’ war against Israel, there is no truth in labelling. To paraphrase Orwell, War is Peace, Ignorance is Enrichment, and Genocide is Liberal Democracy
“One State Solution” is the latest fashion among Israel’s enemies. If implemented, Israel would be merged into a single country with the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, and both Jews and Palestinians living elsewhere would have a “right of return.”
Conveniently unmentioned in the Harvard conference brochure is that an influx of millions of Palestinians would create a majority vote for dismantling Israel and replacing it with a Palestinian-Arab state.
Palestinians may call this “One State,” but for Israeli Jews, the more accurate caption for this “solution” would seem to be “Final.”
That Harvard’s conferees have no intention of presenting a fair and honest debate on the implications of “One State” is made clear by the speakers list, which consists mostly of militant Palestinian advocates, plus a few left-wing Jewish extremists who question the validity of Israel’s existence. Such as:
7:30AM GMT 21 Feb 2012
Sir Paul Nurse said many young people were unable to distinguish between “nonsense” and science because they are not taught to differentiate between reliable and unreliable information.
In an interview with Radio Times, Sir Paul said better scienceeducation was crucial to Britain’s economic future and improving society.
The Nobel Prize-winning geneticist and cell biologist said: “Astrology might be amusing and entertaining, but it has nothing to do with rational thought.
“Astronomy is a science where you get ideas and hypotheses, you test them, you try to shoot them down and, at the end of that rational process, you have reliable knowledge.
“Learning to make that distinction between reliable and unreliable knowledge is really important in education.”
Many Canadian police agencies “actively suppress” racial data when delivering their annual crime reports to Ottawa — a trend that is both disturbing and growing, according to a study released Wednesday.
The study, published in the Canadian Journal of Law and Society, said the continued “whitewashing” of criminal data makes it virtually impossible for researchers to gauge whether police are dealing with racial and ethnic minority groups in an equitable manner.
“Community relationships are so important for policing. If you want to develop better relationships, show you’re working on issues these communities are concerned about,” said lead author Paul Millar, an assistant professor of criminology at Nipissing University in North Bay, Ont., in an interview. “Be accountable.”
Police agencies gave several reasons Wednesday for why they don’t collect or report racial characteristics of the people they come in contact with.
RCMP spokesman Sgt. Greg Cox said asking a victim or accused person to identify their race “may give rise to human rights and privacy concerns.”
