Category Archives: Crypto Environmentalism

Trudeau’s classical communist misdirection: War on climate change means sacrificing food and shelter security

Posted on by

The video below has been edited slightly from the longer one put below it. But the idea is intact. Trudeau is amplifying a global climate crisis which does not appear to be even remotely happening, to justify more and more authoritarian measures which will impact our general wealth and well being.

We have been making many allusions to 1984 recently, but hey. If the shoe fits…

2:38 version without cuts at the key points

https://twitter.com/PopeSeabass/status/1858890974283395366

In 1984, a war which may or may not even be happening, is most certainly being used as a distraction for the public in order for them not to question the degree to which they are oppressed.

The following excerpts are from Goldstein, the alleged counter revolutionary leader within 1984’s book

The war is waged by each ruling
group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make
or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society
intact. The very word 'war', therefore, has become misleading. It would
probably be accurate to say that by becoming continuous war has ceased to
exist.

[...]

“The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society intact.”

When reading things like Rules for Radicals, one thing jumps out. A great deal of Frankfurt School tactics appear to be extrapolations and abstractions of baser Marxist thought. Especially Critical Theory. Lots and lots of Marxist tactics heaped upon us all today is at its essence, critical theory. Homophobia, Transphobia, climate denialism and so on are all mere abstractions on ‘racism’, itself a critical theory attack on Western Civ. After all, in pretty much every other nation and culture in the world, racism as it is defined by the left isn’t just ubiquitous, it’s actual policy. Just ask any white or black man in Japan. Or China. And anyone from the wrong tribe in Africa etc. etc. This was abstracted into an actual crime by the marxists, but for the denizens of the West only.

In this example, the argument is that the war on Global Warming is an abstraction of the perpetual war described in Brave New World. That it is a tool of control of oppression of the non-elites. That Trudeau can say in his usual clumsy direct-indirect fashion, that people should prioritize the climate, meaning the ‘fight to stop global warming’ over their own shelter and feeding their children. War you see, is peace.

Unfortunately the left appears to also be ramping up an actual kinetic war, the effects of which are verifiable for the moment.

But that information is all over the place and until we have something to add, there are many links in the comments and of course on Twitter about what Russia will or will not do, and is or is not doing. Also lots about what NATO is or is not doing, and probably most of that info is utter rotten tripe planted by more sides than we are likely even aware of and for purposes that are not always clear.

But Trudeau’s constant appeal to fighting climate change to justify every authoritarian bill and policy he puts forward is transparent enough to have some real certainty that it is what it appears to be if you look behind the curtain just a tiny tiny bit. A stammering, informal, ‘I’m just like you’ tyrant who fully intends to pull the temple down on self governance forever in every way he possibly can, and using every critical theory attack he can muster up. And most obviously, the utter scientific nonsense of “climate Change” from human produced, CO2.

Chemtrails?

Posted on by

This is an issue I have really worked at avoiding. It feels like an injected narrative to make other factual psuh-backs on state narratives look ridiculous. In other words, people who might believe the vaxx is a bio weapon created in a lab by the Chinese along with say, Fauci’s various organizations like Eco health Alliance could be made to look like kooks who believe in chemtrails. It is widely held that the term, “Conspiracy Theorist” was coined by the CIA/FBI to stop people from looking into the JFK assassinations.

The videos inset in this video are factual though. There is no doubt that governments around the world have been perusing weather control technologies for decades. And also even created some. Seeding clouds with silver iodide goes back a long way. But as to the rest of the claims in this video, well some of them are just claims for sure. Some have evidence of a sort. I dunno. Let’s call this for entertainment purposes until further notice.

There really are conspiracy theories that are a genuine threat to the world though. One of them is that Western industrial activity right down to heating your own homes creates CO2 which will cause the ice caps to melt and the oceans to rise and is an existential threat which would wipe out coastal cities by the year 2000! Now that is a dangerous, not to mention kooky conspiracy theory.

But I really have no idea about this one. RAIR article is here.

Comments on this post:

Comment:
Them trails are real.  I am a soft fruit grower in Southern Okanagan Valley of British Columbia.  We have experienced unprecedented sudden weather pattern changes, odd cloud configurations and elevated levels of Aluminum in our soils.  Aluminum inhibits a plants ability to uptake necessary minerals.  Conspiracy theory, no.  This is going on, look at the big picture which is reduce population specifically in North America.  Reduce food supply and go even further, reduce crop yield.  They are doing it!

Let’s ask a Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton about CO2 and Global Warming

Posted on by

 

Full text:

 

“CO2 is actually good for the world, so people ought to be encouraged to make more of it.” – Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University. According to Dr. Happer, carbon taxes are being pushed by “opportunists who are making a good living out of frightening everybody, and sucking money out of the common man, to push idiotic energy solutions on them that make everyone poorer and provide less reliable energy, less affordable energy”. “Let’s hope that there are enough people of common sense in the world… Let’s hope that they’ve got the good sense to throw out the rascals before they do too much damage.” Credit:

@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU
@NewAmericanMag

Let’s just settle a few things about climate

Posted on by

The first thing is, Climate and weather are not the same thing.

Second thing is a hot summer day is not unusual, and neither is a week long heat wave anywhere from May to September.

The third thing is a bit more complex. I’ll link a documentary below on it, but to summarize:

All of recorded climate history actually matches sunspot observations perfectly. Not like Al Gore or Michael Mann and their dialectical climate data, which can be compared very closely with Fisman, Fauci and Neil Ferguson’s dialectical Covid models which caused, well you all know what it caused.

The reason that climate data matches sunspot data, is that sunspots mean solar storms. Solar storms cause solar wind, which washes over the earth with high energy, but also pushes away cosmic rays. Cosmic rays seed clouds and cool the earth and make the global climate more rainy. So when the sunspot number is low, like 0 to not much above 0, the Earth experiences a lot of cosmic rays, and is cooler and wetter, When there is a high sunspot number, the earth experiences hotter and drier weather.

The graphs fit perfectly, meaning perfectly inversely, ever since Galileo took a toy made by a Dutch optics maker and pointed it at the Sun and discovered sunspots. Sunspot numbers have been recorded ever since.

Around 15 to 20 years ago, actual scientists were concenred that we may be heading into a deeper part of the current ice age. The reason was, the sunspot number was zero for a long long time. Months, years even. And things had gotten cooler even though the left was constantly demanding we deconstruct our industry cause ‘global warming’.

Have a look at the sunspot numbers now.

As of mid afternoon, June 19, (two days before the summer solstice)

So before we blame automobiles,. cow farts, nitrogen fertilizer, maybe have a look at the Sun. Cause you know, it is very, very hot. And is not perfectly consistent in terms of output all the time.

For an excellent explanation with details by the two scientists who discovered and proved this claim, please watch below.

Still though. It has to be embarrasing, even for them, to have to explain to leftists that the sun drives climate. They where of course canceled out of the sciences. Just like doctors who said: Covid isn’t that serious, masks don’t work and the vaxx is garbage. Only about 20 years earlier. Aufhaben, or cancel culture, has been in effect for counter-narrative speakers for some time now. In a way, this proves that the Climate scam is another dialectical line of effort. Like Covid, and whatever else is next and a dozen other things that came before, which always have the result of lowering our standard of living, our personal freedoms, and increasing the power of the state to a point where it is arbitrarily, and even whimsically tyrannical, and truth becomes crime. Perhaps the only thing the state will call a crime in the not too distant future.

About Alberta’s emergency energy notification to all residents

Posted on by

The other night due to very cold temperatures expected in Alberta, the following warning was sent out. Keep in mind, most power there is generated by oil and gas.

Essential needs only, don’t charge your E cars. OK then.

It is the axiomatic belief of this site that government creates problems and destroys solutions in order to move society from Socrates to Plato (as seen in the video at the bottom of the previous post) or put more simply, from an individualist state to one of total state power where the individual simply doesn’t exist, even conceptually.

During the first scammed energy crisis in our lifetime experience during the 1970s ( I would say Bullshit one, but that would be an actual solution as you will see in a moment) people were made to line up around the block because the world was running out of gas. Some of us will remember that. At the time, there was an article in the Ottawa Journal (before unions destroyed it as it was a conservative leaning paper) about a British pig farmer that converted pig excrement to fuel. He ran his whole farm on the output of his pigs. The money quote: “The smellier the sh*t, the better the fuel”.

So we knew back then that a certain amount of the West’s energy needs could be met by fermenting animal waste into methane presumably. Or by one process or another a massive amount of energy, and energy which would be carbon neutral if you buy into any of that GW nonsense.

More recently, during the Covid years, an Alberta fellow found a way of making cheap, CO2 free fuel out of ammonia. No idea how he does it but we posted an article on this site about it. David Menzies of the Rebel spoke with him. And the only things you get out of the article is, cheap fuel is easy to make which does not create atmospheric CO2, and NO ONE in government wanted to hear from him. NO ONE returned any of his calls. He had a solution to the whole fake problem as described by the neo-tyrannical governments of the West, the WEF and in general, the COMINTERN. But the last thing they wanted was a solution. In fact, the fellow who developed this method should probably consider himself lucky to be alive. But since the state has such control over media and all systems now, for the moment they don’t need to rely on such crude methods. For the moment.

Around 10 or 15 years ago, General Electric advertised a nuclear battery they were making about the size of a steamer trunk, which could be buried under an intersection and power a neighbourhood for about 100 years. This also solves the energy issue if one were to pretend that CO2 was a problem, rather than being the key to life which it actually is.

This solution was also ignored or demonized as was nuclear power in general. George Bush built a massive system of railways and a special vault inside Yucca Mountain to contain spent nuclear fuel. Obama shut it down. The science for building it was real. The science for shutting it down was not. Which could mean that Obama, like Trudeau and the rest of the COMINTERN know clearly that CO2 is not a problem. If it was the existential crisis they claim, they would be putting nuclear into every phone, closet, car and energy hungry thing in existence.

And now we have this:

Chinese-developed nuclear battery has a 50-year lifespan — Betavolt BV100 built with Nickel-63 isotope and diamond semiconductor material

Chinese company Betavolt has announced an atomic energy battery for consumers with a touted 50-year lifespan. The Betavolt BV100 will be the first product to launch using the firm’s new atomic battery technology, constructed using a nickel-63 isotope and diamond semiconductor material. Betavolt says its nuclear battery will target aerospace, AI devices, medical, MEMS systems, intelligent sensors, small drones, and robots – and may eventually mean manufacturers can sell smartphones that never need charging.

Buying an electronics product that can go without charging for 50 years would be amazing. But the BV100, which is in the pilot stage ahead of mass production, doesn’t offer a lot of power. This 15 x 15 x 5mm battery delivers 100 microwatts at 3 volts. The company says multiple BV100 batteries can be used together in series or parallel depending on device requirements, and Betavolt has plans to launch a 1-watt version of its atomic battery in 2025.

Many people assume that the tech for this was likely stolen. Lets say that’s true. It would mean a Western country had developed it, but chose not to make or market it. Why would that be I wonder?

And now for the most trivial aspect of all this, but still cannot go without saying:

Alberta doesn’t use a lot of solar or wind. But remember what happened in Texas a few years ago when the windmills froze and 700 people died of cold. Just imagine what would happen in Alberta if they allowed themselves to be bullied into the fantasy energy plans. A great deal of reality-centred people would be dead by now.

From our point of view, this would not be a problem for the COMINTERN centred government of Canada.

A couple of videos on the dialectic of Climate Change and an attempt to use reality and science to oppose it

Posted on by

Of course the problem is, as we see it, that arguing the issue is a kind of controlled opposition. So long as one fails to see that the issues are never about the issue, you assist the state in taking more power, rights and the ability to use reality for any outcome. Still, part, a small part, of the fight is getting people to understand that the reality of a thing is not what we are told it is, and the narrative upon which, policy is set, is false. More than false, but let’s start there. Stephen Coughlin calls it, “An imposed Pseudo-reality” and that indeed is what it is.

But the problem is arguing either side of an issue tends to favour the enemy’s real agenda.

Ottawa’s Tom Harris does a truly excellent job of explaining the reality of climate and CO2’s role in keeping us all alive. And I think it does help in the micro. But as the people who fabricate these narratives know it’s a lie from the outset, arguing the truth is very unlikely to help at the policy level.

Here is Australian broadcaster, Alan Jones attempting to inject truth to narratives:

Tom Harris: CO2 is the stuff of life

Posted on by

Environmental scientist, Tom Harris gave a talk at a secret location in Ottawa in November to examine the scientism of ‘Global Warming’ and climate hysteria in general. Tom also examined the connection between increasingly authoritarian policies being implemented and climate pseudo-science as the basis for these new restrictions on our liberties. Tom went one better. He looked at the historical amount of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere, and what the minimum requirement for life on Earth to exist actually is. If there is a climate crisis, it is the opposite to what we are being sold.

On recent weather events as used by Maoist mass line narrative attacks to promote the destruction of the individual via global warming active measures

Posted on by

The Global Warming Maoist mass line Narrative attack is ramping up as we all know. This time, climate is cooperating a bit with them. Which means that this is one of the rare times that actual science is required to refute the lies. Usually, the lies are obvious and people are forced to go along with them as signs of submissiveness to the narratives. So science doesn’t help and truth just gets you in trouble. In fact these are constants when you are dealing with the purveyors of the narratives. The value of truth and science is for those still willing to consider that the narratives may be lies, at least inwardly. To elaborate on that a moment, increasingly I meet people in day to day life that do know what is true about a variety of things and are afraid to discuss them openly and only refer to what is true in coded terms and not at all if strangers are within earshot. This is Canada today.

Before watching this documentary about climate, which is about an hour and truly the best thing made, please have a look at this page and note the sunspot number for today and the forecast and the general sunspot number for the summer if you can find that here.

After noting the sunspot number, please sit back and enjoy this documentary made by actual climate scientists, and not jet setting neo-Maoists about what drives climate. SURPRISE! It won’t be a surprise. But the reasoning and explanation for the source of climate changes on Earth is really excellent and the dynamic they discovered is new, and actually has real predictive value and can be tested with historical records, right back to Galileo. And it has been. And it fits perfectly with this model. Unlike global warming, which has yet to make a single correct prediction. Ever. This really is worth an hour if you want to be properly equipped to understand what drives climate. Clearly though, as we state repeatedly, you cannot convince a liar with the truth. But you can sometimes persuade their victims with it.

This site has a LOT of info about real climate science. Often the materials are pulled down and we don’t notice as we can’t check everything every day. But we keep a lot of it on this page. So please check it out and if you happen to notice a video missing, let us know in the comments and we will try and restore it.

 

The point is never the point, and global warming

Posted on by

The following short clip is a single question taken from a video of dual presentation on ‘Climate Change’ given by Action4Canada last week in Ottawa. The whole presentation, which richly deserves to be seen, will be available as soon as possible.

This is a question from one audience member to the first speaker of two discussing ‘Climate change’,and who, by her question, is pointing out a herd of elephants in the room:

This clip is a magnificent example of how we all become controlled opposition when we do not understand the larger strategy.

With the left, the point is never the point. The revolution, is always the point.

How does this apply here. Well, its clear that the same people who are working three shifts to take away your privacy and liberties under the rubric of Global Warming/Climate Change, are the same people replacing the population, or if not replacing, diluting them, of Western nations to the point that there is no coherence to them anymore. This means no shared values, history or sense of joint existence.

The questioner makes the point that each person who moves from a hot place to a cold place increases their ‘carbon footprint’ by 4.2X on average. So how can the same policy makers do this while also claiming to want to stop Climate Change?

At this point let’s look at the difference between a mistake and a policy.

A mistake is where you try to achieve an objective, and when you notice your methods are not achieving the results you want, you stop using them, and try something else. A policy is where you see you are in fact getting the results you want and you continue and or double down on it, no matter what you say you want or are trying to achieve. The immigration and climate change frauds have both been going on for far far too long for this to be incompetence. Writing it off as such, stupidity, ignorance, hypocrisy, greed, this is what makes us controlled opposition. Even unwittingly so. Because we are arguing the point, which it never is.

This is not to say that the architects of all these things do not fully take advantage of these lesser attributes of man. Corporate and individual greed is most definitely one of the ways the architects managed to entice powerful people and institutions into being a part of the overall plan.

When you argue against abortion, ‘trans-rights’ and all the other not-really-the-issue-issues  which are tearing us all apart in the absence of a greater understanding, it assists those with the meta plan to control us all through a total philosophical revolution. A revolution at the core of who we are.

It is obvious that the people pushing these issues and policies do not believe in them. Al Gore bought a beachfront villa for USD $8,875,000 in California in 2010, presumably in part, from the proceeds of his movie warning us all that the oceans were rising and would swallow up coastal cities within a few years. Flashing forward to today, The Oligarchs use private gets to get to the brothels in Davos every year for the WEF hedonism and megalomania festival. (Ever see the menu? It isn’t cricket)

This is because the issues themselves are meant to be destructive to our civilization, as are the ‘solutions’ to them. To divide, to dissolve any coherence we may have as a people. It is also to have the state be able to arbitrarily impose a pseudo-reality on us at a whim, especially destructive ones, and have us accept, believe and defend them. (The first example in this author’s lifetime would be Trudeau Senior’s arbitrary, expensive and destructive imposition of the Metric System in Canada. More on that in another post)

So a phoney problem is invented that requires a solution that the architects wanted all along but the public would never accept. In fact we have national constitutions preventing exactly these scenarios. This so called solution will control critical aspects of the public’s lives. Aspects which they would never have willingly given up were it not for the ‘problem’. But the phoney problem media blasts at us night and day is the device used to get the public to accept the only “acceptable ‘solution” to it. (Think vaccines) Thesis, counter-thesis, solution.

Also note: Real problems are never to be addressed; the drastically falling sperm rates in men. The paving of the best farmlands in Canada to build gargantuan brutalist beehives for massive  (debatably) legal and illegal immigration, with no consideration of how to feed these new people that we are aware of. Massive spike in dangerous recreational drug use, enormous health impacts of gene therapy vaccines, which cannot even be acknowledged by the enemy-propaganda networks that our media has become.

That is not to say that we should not understand these things on a case by case. Small policy victories can be made if you can argue reality against the imposed pseudo reality, or put simply, the total BS reasons to create a policy no one would want otherwise. But only if you can do it publicly enough that it embarrasses the policy makers. I have seen it with my own eyes. But it’s the publicity of showing obvious reality that makes the difference and again, at a small scale, like a school board. This is because the policy makers know damn well the policies they want are based on lies. But then sometimes larger scale powers will designate those who insist on reality to be terrorists, and eliminate that line of defence, such as, like parents who speak truth to school boards. The children must be seen as property of the state and doubly so what they believe. The responsibility for ensuring that ownership is all the parents have left.

If the policy makers actually wanted to mitigate the problems they claim are the issues, then proving they are wrong would work to change the policy, even without public scrutiny.

Think about how many fields in which we have all had to become minor experts in the past few decades. Climatology and virology for sure. For some of us, Islam and other issues every so often. Y2K, ozone holes, purple loosestrife, zebra mussels, killer bees, africanized honey pigs. This is because all these things are being used to negate us as a people, a history and a culture. Understanding these things well enough to know what we are being told is false is great and all. But how often does it work to explain to others who need to believe the government is benign? I would guess close to never.

The videos of the speakers from Friday night’s event should be available soon. And people should watch them. They are excellent expert presentations on climate reality. Understanding them will make you bullet proof in climate discussions. The result of which is people stop shooting at you. Getting them to understand that this isn’t about climate science is another thing altogether.

At some point the question always comes up in one form or another, ‘Why would they lie to us about all this’?

Answering this is very dangerous because unless really well explained, you will be dismissed as a nut no matter how on top of the truth you actually are. And frankly, even if it is really well explained. You have to have an audience willing to consider that they are misled as opposed to waiting for an opportunity to dismiss you and everything you think from their uncluttered intellectual cosmos.

For those who figured out early that the gene-therapy shots were a bad idea, discussions with others usually went loosely like this:

[Vaxx Skeptik] well, science science, data data, experts with nothing to gain and everything to lose show us that…

[Normie] Ok Well then if that is true, then why would they….

And that is when it all goes off the rails. You could convince someone that the vaxx is bad using reason, science and evidence. But if you dare tread into the motives for agencies promoting the shots, you move from what you know and can prove into dark conspiracies and ad hominem that even if true, will cost you your listener. In fact being asked why they would do this is a kind of trap, whether the asker is conscious of that or not.

Dr. Peter McCullough early on was brilliant in his approach. He would testify to the facts of heart damage from the gene-therapy injections, and when asked why this was being done to us, would refuse to touch the subject. He would just stick to cardiology. That was the right approach in terms of not being immediately dismissed. He did point out though, that the official literature contained curious omissions, leaving it to the listener to figure out why those omissions existed. He also explained the curious censorship of his factual documents on Covid19. This leads us to the reality on these narratives without saying that in fact, narratives is what they are. One doesn’t have to censor truth, facts and expert opinion unless you are trying to hide it.

So what Dr. McCullough did is give facts that leave the listener to come to rational conclusions about the next layer problems. This can work.

So asking everyone to abandon their jobs, families, hobbies and other interests to become an expert on every set of meta-lies imposed on us to get a world of stateless people with no rights is not a practical solution. Most people won’t even bother to read a single paper or watch a decent video showing the counter-narrative materials.

But trying to get people to understand how to look at all things in official media and see what they are designed to do, might work. Still, it is critical that we all must continue to fight the small fights we chose to take on. Whether it is the bogus trans-rights issues used to make monsters out of your children with surgery and drugs while the same people ban books like Dr. Seuss and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory for somehow being dangerous to children, or forcing your children to endure male fetishists to read kid’s books to them – yeah fight it if you can endure the Discourse Theory attacks you will be under as a consequence. We have to keep doing this. But sooner or later we have to come to understand that these issues are not the real fight.

The real fight is against a total Marxist revolution attempting to destroy every single aspect of our existence, using issues from the sanctity of life (abortion and MAiD) right on down through our cultures, to what type of car you drive.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.

Thank you for your time.

 

Pseudo-environmentalism and the extinction of the Right Whale

Posted on by

This is a now archetypal story. Feminism has been subverted by Hegelian/Marxist weaponized rhetorical devices to destroy women. It was possibly even created to do that. The practice of medicine, well I’ll leave that to readers to decide how that started and where it is now.

Climate science is now a tool to destroy only Western Civilization while all other cultures and industry get a pass on using as much coal and oil as they want.

And of course, environmentalism is now about to cause the extinction of an extremely rare species of whale, called the Right Whale.

This problem is now so large, that actual environmentalists do not wish to call themselves that, as the word itself now means corruption and perversion of something important to do its opposite.

Can anyone think of a word to describe this process? Starts with a D.

Please read story details at: RAIR Foundation.com

Tom Harris: The scam of the climate crisis, and Ottawa’s authoritarian non-solution to the non-crisis

Posted on by

Anyone who is paying attention should know how important this information is since the UN, WEF and Google has created a totalitarian cabal to make sure you can never see this by searching for it.

Please read the story details here at RAIR Foundation

Important Lowell Green reboot show on Ottawa’s full on authoritarian revolution disguised as Climate justice

Posted on by

For those who don’t know Lowell Green, he was the finest voice on Ottawa radio for decades. When Bell Media bought CFRA, the talk-radio station that Lowell was by far the most popular voice. They waited till they could phase him out, and once that was done, they mass fired all the conservative hosts. Even ones who had the highest ratings in Canada for that time slot. I’m thinking of Pastor John Council as one example. But Nick Vandergragt was also sacked in the same meeting. Now CFRA is another narrative voice peddling the same leftist dialectics as everyone else. Think CNN without all the hair.

Bell Media also owns CTV, and a dozen or so other media outlets in Canada.

Today, Lowell Green did a show on Facebook. I had no idea he was even still on the air, or had a public profile at all. But he does, and anyone living in the Western world needs to listen to today’s show if you want to know your present or your near future. But if you are in Canada, and especially in Ottawa, and especially if you own any property at all, you really, really have to watch this:

(I grabbed this off of Facebook and placed it on an open platform which doesn’t track you, and also isn’t Facebook. When you watch tonight’s Tucker, you will have yet another giant reason to despise Facebook. Turns out they did help rig the election, and now they are blaming it on the FBI. Which while also true, doesn’t change a damn thing about Facebook’s rigging by preventing fundraising and censoring pro-trump groups.

Dutch authorities are shattering the public trust in police and security services

Posted on by

Communist governments and their controllers, be it from the WEF or Bilderberg or whatever, have done an excellent job of turning the people against each other. These videos from The Netherlands show how a people can really, and should really, come to loath, despise and distrust the police and authorities as they now do the opposite of what the police are supposed to do, and for which they used to earn gratitude and respect. Namely protest the rights and property of the public. Now of course, they take them both away.