Actual climatology – just the facts ma’am with Prof. Ian Plimber

Remember the climate huxter, David Suzuki? In the 80s he used to shill for communists by claiming Western industry was going to destroy the Earth by putting out soot (Carbon) that would block out the sun and cause an ice age. He called this, ‘Nuclear Winter’. Then, once CBC buried all the video of him saying this bilge, he reappeared with the exact opposite narrative and started saying carbon from Western industry would cause ‘global warming’.

Here is he blackmailing children to send him money to save the polar bears.

The worst kind of ugly climate propaganda: David Suzuki targets kids at Christmas in the name of climate change

Here’s the popup message solicitation you get when you visit the website for the first time:


Climate change is melting the North Pole and it’s no longer safe for Santa and his Workshop. So our dear old friend is packing up the sleigh to find somewhere else to live.

You can help! Move your mouse over this website to find gifts you can buy Santa to help him set up a temporary Workshop and protect the North Pole for his return.

Of course, you’re savvy enough to know we won’t be sending actual gifts to Santa. You will receive a tax receipt for 100% of your purchase and proceeds will be used by the David Suzuki Foundation to support our critical work to protect nature and the environment from threats like climate change.

Buying these green gifts and personalized ecards on behalf of hard-to-buy-for friends or relatives on your holiday list is a great way to show you’re thinking of them — and the planet!

The current vaccine, digital currencies, Covid, and lots of other attacks on the west via language, are not the first lines of effort against classical thought. Crypto-environmentalism was most definitely one of them. A line of effort is a point of focus for a disinformation campaign intended to damage a target in specific ways.

Let’s take a purely hypothetical and absurd example as I find fiction often helps to illustrate a point.

One of the main targets of disinformation would be the enemy military. So imagine if you can, that say, the US military picked a man to be a four star general who openly stated he was really a woman, and they picked him, not because he was the best candidate with a peculiarity but specifically because he is a man who insists he is a woman, and has some of the outward trappings of a female, but clearly is not one.

Just to add to the impossibility of this farcical situation, imagine the military was paying for cosmetic surgery for any person to sort of kind of look like the other sex, making them sterile for sure, but also making them less effective as soldiers, and certainly taking them out of potential combat for some long period of time.

Then imagine that the military would put time money and effort into making flight suits specially for pregnant women, where the high G forces of fighter jets would most certainly damage or destroy a gestating baby no matter what the costume worn. G forces are G forces. And the human limit is about 9 Gs for a fit healthy person with no hangover. Imagine what just 2 or 3 X the normal pull of gravity would do to a developing embryo. The most expensive abortion of all time.

(It is possible that the military developed a flight suit, which is basically just customized overalls for pilots and not a G suit for pregnant women. This should have cost about USD $19.95 at wall mart though. A normal flight suit with some spandex around the middle would work fine.)

All of this seems absurd of course. As absurd as if the US government picked a supreme court judge who said as she wasn’t a biologist, she didn’t know the difference between men and women.

Clearly none of these things could possibly happen. But if they did, it would mean the end game of a massively successful disinformation campaign intended to damage all aspects of the machinery of state. And these hypotheticals would represent just one other line of effort. The attack on basic taxonomy. It has become effectively a criminal offence, even if punished outside of the legal space, to advocate or claim there is truth in classical thinking on the biology of sex. On chemistry of climate. On asking for proof of the safety of medicines. Of asking for availability of medicine which is safe and actually works.

It would almost be like as if a Climate activist were to go to the Louvre, disguised as an old woman, and rip of the wig and attack the painting of the Mona Lisa with a cake. What has the Mona Lisa to do with climate? Global warming activism is about one thing. A line of effort against classical thought, culture and values and especially industry. The Mona Lisa is a major symbol of classical artistic achievement. So if such an absurd thing where to happen, well that might explain it.

And then there is  defence of Western culture from one of the most pernicious disinformation attacks of all, the oxymoronic concept of “multiculturalism”. Culture is a set of values which each society codifies into law. Having more than one set of these laws operating within on jurisdiction is not sustainable. Either you have animal cruelty laws or you do not. You cannot allow muslims to slaughter goats or sheep in the garage because they feel its a religious/cultural obligation on them. Either men and women are equal before the law, or they are not. The multicultural aspect of the disinformation lines of effort could go on for volumes. But the point is made.


Rational investor speaks reason to the Mark Carneys of the world

HSBC’s Stuart Kirk tells FT investors need not worry about climate risk

Stuart Kirk dares speak against the imposed pseudo-reality, a prime component of which, is the notion of man-caused, global warming or climate-change. The science doesn’t actually support the hypothesis. But the whole world must factor it in to all descisions in officialdom. Hence imposed pseudo-reality. Therefore any authoritative refutation with actual reality generally has negative consequences to the speaker. In this case, he was suspended from his position.

Here is what the Financial Post says about Mr. Kirk:

Terence Corcoran: Climate war has a new star: Captain Kirk 

HSBC executive Stuart Kirk, now suspended, delivered an evisceration of the doomster climatism that has been driving official investment chatter for years.

Please welcome to our stage Stuart Kirk, who was suspended over the weekend from his post as global head of responsible investing at HSBC Asset Management, a wing of the giant London-based global banking group. His crime? He delivered a brilliant 15-minute presentation to a Financial Times Moral Money conference last Thursday in London. Hold your applause. It is best, before reading this column, to go straight to YouTube and watch Kirk’s minute-by-minute evisceration of the doomster climatism that has been driving official investment chatter for much of the past few years.

The title of his presentation, jammed in among others from the investment, governance and consulting world, was titled “Why Investors need not worry about climate change.” Within a minute, Kirk — a former FT journalist — highlighted his “heresy” with a slide that referred to “unsubstantiated, shrill, partisan, self-serving, apocalyptic warnings that are ALWAYS wrong.” Below that line were a list of climate investment perpetrators: Mark Carney, Henry Paulson, the United Nations, the Bank of England, the World Economic Forum (now meeting in Davos).

Please read the rest at the Financial Times.


The last thing the left wants, is a solution: CO2 and alternative fuels

Thesis, counter-thesis, solution.

Back in the 70s, during the last phoney fuel shortage when people lined up around the block to get expensive gas that often wasn’t available because “energy crisis” and whatever other reasons they made up to explain why it was so difficult to fuel your car, a South African farmer actually came up with a partial solution that would have led to a full solution had he been allowed to do so. And that even though the crisis was a total fraud.

I learned about this from a now defunct Ottawa newspaper called, “The Ottawa Journal”. which was destroyed by its Worker’s Union in 1980, most likely because the paper was more or less attached to the Conservative party, as opposed to the Ottawa Citizen, which was Liberal. But Mother Earth News has a relatively recent article on this fellow, while the original article probably never made it to the Internet.

If you read the article, it shows how not only was he able to run internal combustion engines on the Methane he produced, but a myriad of other problems cleared up as well:

At that point a man pressed a button on an electric pump and the whole mess just whooshed down through an enormously strong steel grid, through a sand trap and into the methane plant. As the last bit went down the drain, a hose was turned on and everything was washed down and left spotless. There were no smells, no odors, and no flies.

The fly eggs that were already in the manure, you see, would go into the plant and that was the end of them. It was really remarkable, actually, how the fly menace cleared up on the farm over a period of a few months. There were practically no flies left.

The whole place cleared up, in fact. The stench from the compost was gone, there was no more dust or dirt flying around, reinfestation of roundworms stopped altogether, and the pigs were certainly healthier.

The phrase, “Thesis, counter-thesis, solution” in practice, and likely also in theory, means a problem is invented, ideally one with little or no basis in reality, a counter-thesis is proposed which enforces the narrative of the thesis by buying into it, as well as creating more problems as you implement fake solutions (think electric cars) and a solution appears which doesn’t actually address the non-problem so much as it aids the goals of a communist attack on Western civilization. Think “carbon tax” and “global Warming”. Most importantly, while these solutions do nothing to solve the problem they are ostensibly for, they do move the revolution forward.

In the case of Global Warming due to (exclusively) Western man’s industrial output and farm output, the solutions offered are always to make industry close to impossible. This is opposed to actual solutions which do not result in the mere redistribution of Carbon in one form or another, like a tax. An absurd proposition to begin with. But that is always how the revolutionaries proceed.

A great example of a real solution to the phoney problem, is President Bush’s effort to make a giant safe repository for spent nuclear fuel in Yuca Mountain and build a system of railways leading to it. The idea was, nuclear reactors could operate with zero CO2 emissions and the spent fuel had a safe place to be stored that would hold them for hundreds, if not thousands of years.

The money was spent, the rail lines had been built, the mountain hollowed out and reenforced with all the safety measures needed, and there is still no fuel in that repository thanks to Obama’s abandonment of the entire project. Just like there is no industrial production of methane from pig farm manure.

Moving to today, The Rebel Media interviewed another farmer who found a way to make safe clean fuel out of ammonia with an average cost of 25c per litre. Put another way, twenty five cents per litre!

It has no pollution, no CO2 in the exhaust and is cheap like borscht. I wouldn’t go investing in it just yet though. Clearly there is zero desire for an actual solution to a fake problem that was never meant to be solved in the first place, but was meant as the means to an attack on all of us which we would actually assist because the goals sounded so very reasonable, and of course, we would be “racist, homophobes, transphobes, misogynists” and every other now familiar and orthodox dialectic attack on us that they can use which is more about effect than any kind of grains of truth.

This video is very important.

Once he gets into his attempts to get the government on board based on their own statements of what is needed, he passes the bullseye and goes off the board to a degree. Not that he isn’t correct, but misses the central point. It’s not just about corruption. Its about destroying the west, the nation state, Western civilization and Greek thought itself.



Freeman Dyson on climate change

Checking out the site’s Global Warming page, I noticed most of the best materials have been removed or forbidden. No surprise there really.

But this clip was one of the best from a science point of view, so I wanted to restore it right away. Originally from the Vancouver Sun website, for some reason they elected to take it down. So here it is again.

Go Fund Me cancels co-founder of Greenpeace without explanation or notice

Patrick Moore has a superb Twitter feed. Those of you still on Twitter, please subscribe to him.


Scientist explains that now that we allowed Covid lockdowns, we will get Climate lockdowns next

For the detailed explanation please see this RAIR Foundation report

This interview done at the Ottawa Covid Measures protest, February 14, 2021

The Climate scare officially recanted by major activists and media

Even FORBES published his recanting of this abuse of the public. And then pulled the article.

But here it is from the archive.

The following link is from David Icke’s site. Now while this is a really really poor standard to put him against, he is at least more honourable and honest than the CBC.

Climate Depot still has the original article up for the moment.  Part of it below

Prominent climate activist Shellenberger officially recants: ‘On Behalf Of Environmentalists, I Apologize For The Climate Scare’

We will post the Forbes thing if it can be found on the Wayback. but Google in its infinite Winston Smithism, has started tampering with that from some reports we have seen, recently as well.

German Parliament applies Frankfurt School tactics to discredit actual science

This is a stunning example of Alynski’s rule 13, (Don’t attack the idea, attack the person) and Habermas’ force a consensus and then accuse all who speak outside of the consensus of hate speech. In this case, the extent to which they had to stretch to discredit solid science, from an exceptionally qualified scientist, resembles what was done to Bilyana Martinovski by the Swedish Police.

Thank you Miss Piggy for what was an enormous task translating this video.

Please watch to the end. This is an important video.

Direct link

Another thing. Miss Piggy who translated this, said that the strident annoying German voice over did not translate everything that was said.

In the original video the translation voice was very loud. So annoying and so occulting of the original that I wondered if they tried to hide his statements.

In the version above I used EQ to make his voice more audible and you can actually follow his English without blowing an ear drum. Miss Piggy did get all he said. But remember that the local audience did not get his complete segments from the German translation, which you can hear at this link.


A few science items on climate and the origins of the Global Warming myth

Did You Know the Greatest Two-Year Global Cooling Event Just Took Place?

Would it surprise you to learn the greatest global two-year cooling event of the last century just occurred? From February 2016 to February 2018 (the latest month available) global average temperatures dropped 0.56°C. You have to go back to 1982-84 for the next biggest two-year drop, 0.47°C—also during the global warming era. All the data in this essay come from GISTEMP Team, 2018: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP). NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (dataset accessed 2018-04-11 at This is the standard source used in most journalistic reporting of global average temperatures.


The 2016-18 Big Chill was composed of two Little Chills, the biggest five month drop ever (February to June 2016) and the fourth biggest (February to June 2017). A similar event from February to June 2018 would bring global average temperatures below the 1980s average. February 2018 was colder than February 1998. If someone is tempted to argue that the reason for recent record cooling periods is that global temperatures are getting more volatile, it’s not true. The volatility of monthly global average temperatures since 2000 is only two-thirds what it was from 1880 to 1999.


“No Climate Emergency” – Scientists (Comments are great as well)

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked

AP: June 30, 1989

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ?eco- refugees,? ? threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.

He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.

As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday.

Coastal regions will be inundated; one-sixth of Bangladesh could be flooded, displacing a fourth of its 90 million people. A fifth of Egypt’s arable land in the Nile Delta would be flooded, cutting off its food supply, according to a joint UNEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study.

?Ecological refugees will become a major concern, and what’s worse is you may find that people can move to drier ground, but the soils and the natural resources may not support life. Africa doesn’t have to worry about land, but would you want to live in the Sahara?? he said.

UNEP estimates it would cost the United States at least $100 billion to protect its east coast alone.

Shifting climate patterns would bring back 1930s Dust Bowl conditions to Canadian and U.S. wheatlands, while the Soviet Union could reap bumper crops if it adapts its agriculture in time, according to a study by UNEP and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Excess carbon dioxide is pouring into the atmosphere because of humanity’s use of fossil fuels and burning of rain forests, the study says. The atmosphere is retaining more heat than it radiates, much like a greenhouse.

(It goes on like that for some time)