Category Archives: Stupid commie tricks

Facebook decides what facts and opinions will be allowed on a person’s own page

Posted on by

Facebook has decided what one of our hard working translators may post to her own Facebook post and what opinions or facts may not be presented.

Here are three screen captures from her own Facebook page:

145679174591411

Below, the actual comment that Facebook censored with the explanation from Facebook:

Screen Shot 2016-02-29 at 7.35.59 AM

Pretty soon, there may be an alternative to Facebook which looks and works pretty much the same way. When its ready, I hope a new diaspora forms. One for freedom of speech. Especially when it can be shown to contain truthfulness.

The video referred to in the post is this one, which was posted also yesterday.

No Admittance for Germans? Savings Bank Opened Only for Refugees

Posted on by

An original translation by Nash Montana

From this German Website

 

When it’s about money: Savings Bank! And now Bielefeld has one just for refugees.

As fast as possible they should be “provided” with savings accounts, so that they quickly can take part in commercial life in Germany.

Of course this would be a relief for the administration, but is this really only about participation, integration, relief?

Nationwide there are a multitude of buildings, especially concerning ATM’s, which are not easily accessible for handicapped people. Wheelchair bound people often fail to even enter the small cubicles which are usually not much larger than a telephone box, and they have to rely on the few “real” locations or in inner cities they have to use general ATM’s which will charge them extra. Which of course, exactly for this group of people, presents an increased risk.

Even so, an entire location just for handicapped people or only for women does not exist.

Is it reconcilable with equality that now refugees are being provided with their very own savings bank? Why not just an islamic Shariah bank like in Frankfurt am Main? Yes, it does exist. Here: ?

So what are German and conventional migrants, which do not possess “refugee status” thinking of such preferential treatment?

Will grocery stores get on the bandwagon and implement registers only for refugees?

Will there soon be parking only for refugees, since it’s already in discussion if the drivers license test should be available in arabic, of course only in the name of more expedient integration.

The new clientele will most likely only take part in commercial life in one direction, by which their credits and loans will be provided out of nothing . And that in order to get something, one has to put in something, is probably not being mentioned, nor expected from them.

Because for that, there are all the other savings bank locations with their second class clientele, whom the judicial officer will be quickly hounding in case they should neglect to make their regular payment.

 

Open-Air Museum Hessenpark – Free admission for “refugees”, everyone else pays, even dogs.

Posted on by

An Original Translation by Nash Montana With much thanks. 

From this German language Website:

A lively debate is taking place right now about the pricing politics of the open air museum, Hessenpark. Hartz IV recipients (unemployment benefits), people with handicaps, yes even dogs have to pay admission, among everybody else, except of course “asylumseekers” and “refugees” and their companions who get completely free admission. And that is exactly what drives citizens up the wall, they feel that this type of preferential treatment is nothing but discrimination and they feel as though they were second class citizens. And now the Open air museum complains on their Facebook homepage about the incredible amount of hate mail and ugly comments made in regards to their pricing politics.

But this has nothing to do with hate. People are rightfully complaining about an injustice, The guests receive free Wifi, clothing, housing incl, washing machine and dryer, heating, food, cleaing, bus and train tickets, recreational activities and much more, add to that welfare benefits and extra pocket money of 143,00 Euro. And from this pocket money a “guest” could easily spend 2,50 Euro for an admission to the Museum.

Of course all train-station-clappers and refugee fetishists immediately conglomerate and babble out their usual moralistic drivel in commentaries: Super campaign for “refugees”, great for the integration and a chance for a peaceful togetherness, shortly put, all the usual general empty phrases of ‘Gutmenschen’.

We will see how the Hessenpark will act in the near future when paying clientele will cease to visit, because they won’t be able to come up with the admission fee. Either everybody pays or everybody gets free admission.

Quiet Evening Meeting about Refugee Center in Luttelgeest

Posted on by

An original translation by SIMONXML with much thanks.

[This is for the silencing of public dissent file and government cover up files -Ed]

From this Dutch language news site:

Thursday, 21:37 Jan. 28 2016

Photo: The area around Luttelgeest where the emergency ordinance applied

In the area around Luttelgeest in Flevoland, The Netherlands, an emergency ordinance was effected last night for an information meeting about the possible arrival of a second refugee center. The regulation applied to an area within a radius of five kilometers around the village and lasted until midnight. As far as is known, the evening passed quietly.

Because of the emergency ordinance, journalists from the local news agency (Omroep Flevoland) were removed from the area. They wanted to report on the meeting held at the Orchideeënhoeve but were turned away by police. Only people who have been invited to the meeting were allowed into the area.

Police advice

Mayor Van der Werff pointed out that information sessions in other municipalities had gotten out of hand, “especially because the residents who had been invited were approached by the press and were therefore unable to attend the information evening undisturbed and anonymously.” Van der Werff said that based on a police recommendation he had to assume there would be “serious disorders”.

The municipality of Noordoostpolder, which includes Luttelgeest under, has plans for a temporary reception center that would have capacity of 450 refugees. There has been a refugee center in Luttelgeest since 1987 with a capacity for 1400 people. Luttelgeest itself has 2100 inhabitants.

Letter

Reporter Ingrid Kupers from Omroep Flevoland said yesterday that local residents had been informed by letter about the meeting. In it, there were asked not to say anything in public about the meeting. When she went to the meeting location with a cameraman, the police instructed her to leave.

The editor of Omroep Flevoland intends to press charges.

The Vrij Nederland MP, Louis Bontes, spoke of “severe restrictions” on the freedom of the press and demanded to know what the Dutch government was going to do to prevent this happening again.

On Wednesday, the Dutch Society of Chief Editors appealed against the decision of a number of municipalities to keep the press away from information sessions about asylum centers. The immediate reason was the recent events in Heesch in Brabant, where only one local journalist was allowed in.

The Bias of Facebook and social Media

Posted on by

A few days ago, I posted a sort of ‘after-burner’ at the end of one of my posts about a test of anti-Israel bias and even antisemitism on FB and mentioned the video had been removed from YT.

There was some confusion. Many people posted the video we all, including me, assumed it was.

This is the story to which I was referring. Please download it again in case YT decides to also remove this evidence.

In order for women and girls to feel safe from sexual harassment, the Regensburg City council is discussing about specially designed “Lady Zones” in its city busses. They are also imagining “Women only Taxis”.

Posted on by

An original translation by Nash Montana with much thanks

From this well known German news site:

In order for women and girls to feel safe from sexual harassment, the Regensburg City council is discussing specially designed “Lady Zones” in its city busses. They are also imagining “Women only Taxis”.

Christian Janele of the Christian-Socialist (CSB) had turned in an application in November of 2015 – before the mass sexual assaults in Cologne took place. The city planning commission will discuss this issue on Tuesday.

Janele says that many citizens had expressed their concerns with him: “How will my daughter, how will my wife arrive home safely in the evenings?” These fears among the citizenry have to be taken seriously. Markings on the bus floors could establish safe zones, in which only women and children are allowed to be in. Additionally there should be offered women only taxis in which women drivers will bring female passengers to their destinations – and the city will subsidize the taxi fares. Heidelberg has had a similar project ongoing for years, says Janele.

It doesn’t have to be pink

On the social network Facebook, the Christian-Socialists have published a photo montage with a pink “Lady Zone” in a public bus. But the post adds that the safety zone doesn’t have to be pink. Any other color would be possible as well.

Janele rejects the fact that his “Lady Zones” could bear any reminiscence on the US-segregation against black people where they were made to sit in the back of the bus. For him it is solely about “that women feel unsafe on busses”. And the same goes for senior citizens, he adds.

Transportation Authority not particularly fond of the idea

Special markings on the floors of busses are easy to apply with minimal effort – and only need to be effective at night. “During the day this topic is irrelevant.”

But the Regensburg Transportation Authority (RVV) doesn’t think much about these ideas. “There really is no necessity in that regard. We don’t have problems in that matter”, says the manager, Kai Müller-Eberstein.

An overall strategy is needed against sexualized violence

The Federal Association of Women’s Advisory and Women’s Emergency Services says: “Of course women only spaces such as Taxis and parking places could be a sensible measure for women to feel more safe in public spaces.”

But spokeswoman Katja Grieger also points out that such demands could also derail the debate in the wrong direction: “Studies show us unanimously that most assaults take place in the most near social settings and that the actual crime scene often turns out to be the place where the victim lives. There is a societal overall strategy needed against sexualized violence, no matter where it happens.”

Assaults are a topic elsewhere as well

Sexual harassment and assaults in public transportation vehicles is a topic again and again. For instance the Paris local traffic enterprise RATP is starting a campaign against verbal harassment in busses, metro trains and streetcars. In a survey 71% of the women asked, reported to have been victims of sexual harassment in public transportation at least once.

And in Vienna the city council has published behavioral tips for women: “When you are waiting at a stop, it can be sensible to stand with your back against a wall or to be near other people.” Another suggestion: Women should sit next to the driver or in a car with multiple other passengers when riding a bus, a tram or a subway at night.

[Translators comment: 

I think it’s a great idea, because nuances in colors will definitely deter criminals. In fact, there should be more: There should be blue seats on which one is not allowed to steal, green seats on which one is not allowed to beat others up and so on. Teach those rapefugees the law in the most uncomfortable way possible. Everything else is nonsense.]

[Editor comment:

I believe tactically speaking, what this government is actually going to do, is create a target rich environment for those looking to attack women as they clearly do not care about laws with alleged consequences, or at least do for the indigenous Europeans, so putting all the women in a chartreuse or salmon zone on a bus is a little like putting you money in an open bank drawer with no guards or doors]

H/T Tundra Tabloids

Nigel Farage’s car wheels ‘were sabotaged in an assassination attempt’: Ukip leader lost control of Volvo when wheel fell off on motorway… and police confirm foul play

Posted on by

(At the time of posting this stunning story, the BBC has not written anything on it at all)

From the Daily Mail:

Nigel Farage fears he has been the victim of an assassination attempt after his car was sabotaged, causing a terrifying motorway crash.

The Ukip leader careered off a French road after a wheel on his Volvo came loose while he was driving from Brussels back to his home in Kent.

When the police arrived at the scene, they told him that the nuts on all of the wheels had been deliberately unscrewed, The Mail on Sunday has established.

 ‘Target’: Nigel Farage claims he was the victim of an assassination attempt, after he careered off a French road when a wheel on his Volvo came loose while he was driving back to his home in Kent (pictured)

Mr Farage, who has received death threats during his tumultuous time as leader, last night spoke about the ‘frightening’ incident, which took place near Dunkirk.

‘It was the middle of bloody nowhere, and I was caught in a very bad position,’ he said. ‘There was a huge section of roadworks with cars going back and forth on the same side of the carriageway. I suddenly realised I was losing steering but there was no hard shoulder to pull on to. I slowed down, put the hazards on and then one of the wheels came off. I jumped over the wall as quickly as I bloody well could to get away from lorries and everything.’

Click to continue at the DM

Same story at The Sun

 

Daily Mail succumbs to sanitizing the Islam out of terror stories?

Posted on by

Yesterday we posted one of many Daily Mail stories, this one about a man who was stopped on a train because he had an umbrella that had a handle that looked like a Samurai sword.

The article is here and the main photo from the article is below:

An astute reader of this website, KrayThaTruth, had read the story when it was first published and made a comment about the photo, which he screen grabbed. His comment   was not published. But he noticed that when he went back to the story later, they had zoomed in on the photo to crop out the top.

To see the photo as it was before it was changed, click the read more tab please.

Continue Reading →

US based on freedom of speech. Unless you criticize the dogma that drives jihad. Then you will be prosecuted.

Posted on by

(And remember to report anything suspicious. Unless its islamic terror related. Then say nothing or get sued and humiliated)

Loretta Lynch Vows to Prosecute Those Who Use ‘Anti-Muslim’ Speech That ‘Edges Toward Violence’

The day after a horrific shooting spree by a “radicalized” Muslim man and his partner in San Bernardino, California, Attorney General Loretta Lynch pledged to a group of Muslim activists that she would take aggressive action against anyone who used “anti-Muslim rhetoric” that “edges toward violence.”

Speaking to the audience at the Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary dinner Thursday, Lynch said her “greatest fear” is the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric” in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech. She said:

The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence. My message to not just the Muslim community but to the entire American community is: we cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on.

Assuring the pro-Muslim group that “we stand with you,” Lynch said she would use her Justice Department to protect Muslims from “violence” and discrimination.

Claiming that violence against Muslims is on the rise and citing France’s clamp down on potentially radicalized mosques, Lynch suggested the Constitution does not protect “actions predicated on violent talk” and pledged to prosecute those responsible for such actions.

“When we talk about the First Amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American,” said Lynch. “They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.”

“My message not just to the Muslim community but to all Americans is ‘We cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on,'” said Lynch.

It is painfully clear that, like her predecessor Eric Holder, Lynch is far more concerned with promoting the social justice agenda than protecting the Constitutional rights of American citizens. What exactly is speech that “edges toward violence”? What exactly are “actions predicated on violent talk”? In the end, it is whatever she decides it to mean.

Loretta Lynch, at a press conference yesterday, termed the San Bernardino shootings a “wonderful opportunity” to change the nature of police work:

We’re at the point where these issues have come together really like never before in law enforcement thought and in our nation’s history and it gives us a wonderful opportunity and a wonderful moment to really make significant change.

H/T M.

French govt. fines group 216.00 € Each for protesting racist train fares for UMIs

Posted on by

Oz-Rita sent in a translation from a press release by the new French Resistance who call themselves, Generation Identitaire.

Official press release of Generation Identitaire

Illegal invaders (euphemistically referred to as “refugees” can now travel free on French trains. The young French patriots, Generation Identitaire, protested against this, peacefully, via banner (see photo below) on the roof of the Cannes railway station. Each one of them received a penalty of 216 Euros, i.e. 2,160 euros. No “tolerance” for French patriots.

SNCF (National Railways of France) are accomplices in the immigrant invasion.