Category Archives: Media bias

President Trump tweeted this short video from his SOTU

Posted on by

I would like to take this opportunity to tell you all that Youtube, or a group of leftist activists, have been busily going through every one of the video on my channel and mass reporting them.

As a consequence my channel now has had multiple videos restricted in various ways, and highly, highly benign videos I might add.  Normally I hear from Youtube a few times a year. But I have had well over a dozen emails from them in the past 30 hours or so.

Clearly this is activism at work. The videos being censored or restricted etc. contain no violence or harsh language but just ideas the left does not approve of.

My suspicion is coordinated mass reporting and Youtube is siding with them, as their is literally hundreds of thousands of videos that would be way over the line for Youtube if these ones are, or are even close to it.

So for those that value the work of this team of translators and editors, I would recommend you download any and all videos you feel are important and upload them to your own channels, Facebook acct., LiveLeak or Bitchute channel or wherever you feel it would be seen. I doubt they are finished with us yet.

 

BBC busted for invention. Again.

Posted on by

Brian Krebs is widely respected in his field. One of the very top. It is a worthy thread overall and one begins to see how the BBC is losing any respect and credibility amongst increasingly reasonable and established ranks of people.

 

Killing Canada back online!

Posted on by

If anyone has not seen this yet and wants to get an indication of who is working to remove freedoms and democracy from Canada, how and why, you can get at least an intro here.

Some of the people mentioned in this video have since formed an organization together which is essentially a SPLC type thing, calling itself an “Anti-Hate” group and consists of at least two of the people discussed in this video and a couple of others who are not.

More on that later.

German media, government cover up migrant murder of two German boys by shoving in front of train

Posted on by

Nürnberg: A Turk and a Greek push three 16 year old Germans onto the rails – two are dead!

By MICHAEL STÜRZENBERGER – Like a wildfire this went through the social networks on the internet last weekend: At the Nürnberg S-train station Frankenstadion, three young boys from Franken were pushed onto the rails in the night of Friday to Saturday. Two of them were ran over by the oncoming train and killed. Each citizen with enough common sense immediately asked themselves, what specific cultural identity the offenders could have. The Relotious-infested ) mainstream media spoke deceitfully of “Germans”, in order to cloak a migration background. Furthermore drivel about “accident” and “tragedy” was put out there, the three 16 year old’s “fell” onto the rails.

But BILD on Monday morning uncovered the bone hard truth: The murderers, or at least the manslaughterers, who pushed the three German goys onto the rails, were a Turk and a Greek who were merely born in Germany. The highly interesting article from which the picture here on my article comes from, is viewable on BILD with a monthly subscription of 3,99 Euro.

We want to know where these criminals come from who keep making our country less and less safe. Because most often, they are muslims, and that is not really a surprise when you know the ideological regularities of their “religion”. A Turk and a Greek don’t become automatically “German” just because they were born here. It’s exactly the same reason why a cow that is born in a horse barn doesn’t automatically become a horse. While we don’t want to compare people with animals, the principle is the same. A migrant only then becomes a real German when he internalizes our identity, our culture, and the values of our country.

The two victims, Luca and Frederic, were two real Germans. They came from Heroldsberg, which is eleven kilometers northeast of Nürnberg, and they were very popular in their home town. Last Friday night the two high school students were visiting the Nürnberg dance club “Nightlife” and around midnight they wanted to ride home on the train. At the train station, after meeting a third friend, they got into an argument with the Turk and the Greek. According to the police, the fight started due to a ridiculously inane reason, which led to a highly aggressive reaction by the two offenders.

Bio-Germans do not react like this normally. It is much more the explosive mentality of Orientals, distortionary called “southern” a lot, which is amplified through their islamic hate against all non-believers already, that leads to such extreme acts of violence. The Turk is with almost absolute certainty a muslim. And since the Greek is his friend, he was either strongly influenced by his friends’ attitudes, or he was a muslim himself as well. After all he could be a westiraqian Turk, or he could be Albanian with Greek citizenship. 500 years of Ottoman-islamic colonial reign has up until today left devastating tracks even in Greece.

On December 20th, 2007, it also was a Turk (Serkan A.) and a Greek (Spyridon L.), who almost beat to death Bruno N., retired Director of the Hermann-Frieb School in Schwabing, at the Munich train station Arabellapark, simply because he indicated there was a non-smoking policy on the train. While beating him they called him “filthy German”. After their trial they smirked and showed everyone the middle finger. [Translator note: They were given a 12 and 8 year sentence:]

According to BILD, surveillance video of the crime scene in Nürnberg proves that it was pure intent to push the three onto the rails, since the train had already been approaching the station at roughly 80 km/h. Since that train usually does not stop at that station, it ran over Luca and Frederic at full speed. The boys didn’t stand a chance, and they were both killed instantly. Their friend could barely make it back out.

In the media, the two offenders have been unanimously described as “Germans”, for instance at Focus .

“As a spokesman for the police explained, it is two 17 year old Germans who are responsible that three youths fell onto the rails shortly after midnight on Saturday morning.”

As well as the Nürnberg News, who had respectfully called the first offender that was arrested a “Young man”:

“The police has arrested one suspect. The suspect is a 17 year old German, the police spokesman said Saturday. The young man is currently being interrogated.”

Once it was clear that there were two suspects, they further tried  to hone the impression of them being indigenous:

“Meanwhile two 17 year old suspects have been arrested who both also come from the county of Fürth,”

Though the notorious downplaying is based on the words of the police spokesman, but as a journalist one should have the duty to investigate whether there was a migrant background. But that very obviously is not part of the interest in the Relotius-press. BILD in this case is the exception to the rule. Here is the picture of the BILD front page:

All other media played these brutal murders down in a most scandalous manner. The Süddeutsche newspaper is of course leading at the top and it openly hallucinates that a fight between the youths had just taken a “tragic end”. Three 16 year olds were “falling” on the rails and were “caught by the train and ran over and killed”. The two 17 year olds supposedly should be “responsible” for that “their three rivals fell from the platform onto the rails”. One could literally feel how the chief-censor Prantl wielded his mighty pen as he tweaked the timeline of events.

One could speak of intentional deception of the public if the Alp-Pravda didn’t mention that the district attorney had issued a warrant for arrest for manslaughter, and “malice” was assumed. Furthermore they cite investigators who at first left it open whether the suspects had pushed, beaten and kicked the three boys.

Even the Bavarian Rundfunk is of the opinion that the three Germans “fell” on the tracks:

“On the night of Friday, the two youths got into an argument with two other 17 year old youths at the Nürnberg S-train station Frankenstadion. All in all three 16 year old youths fell onto the train tracks during the argument.”

On late Saturday morning, BR Online described the double murder in its video report  as an “accident”, by which “three men” after the fight “fell onto the train tracks”:

The Franken television channel even titled the mruderous events in its TV report as a “S-Train Disaster”. After a row the two victims “fell onto the train tracks” and were “killed by the nearing train”.

The CSU-major of Heroldsberg, Johannes Schalwig, spoke in all earnest of an “accident”. But this was at least manslaughter, if not murder. The entire town with its 8500 citizens is in a state of shock since Friday night. Especially the Sport club TUSPO Heroldsberg, where the two victims have played soccer ever since they were little boys. Furthermore one of the two was a member of the catholic church community St. Margaretha, he was working with other young kids, and the other one played contrabass in a music group.

Originally on Saturday, a benefit event was planned for the acquisition of artificial turf for the soccer field, but of course it was cancelled, and an ecumenical worship service was instead held for the two dead 16 year olds. About 500 citizens came. Merkur (https://www.merkur.de/bayern/tragoedie-in-nuernberg-bayern-jugendliche-von-s-bahn-getoetet-augenzeugen-traumatisiert-11509482.html) reported:

“It is hard to put into words. We are in shock, says the chairwoman of the Gymnastic- and sport association Heroldsberg, Stefanie Piegert. The 16 year olds had played soccer there ever since they were little, lastly in the A-youth. They were great players, they were nice, friendly people. The players of both adult teams were dedicated to help the younger players deal with their grief, Piegert said.

On Saturday evening the association cancelled a benefit event for the financing of artificial soccer field. Instead about 500 citizens visited the ecumenical worship service. Especially the older brother of one of the victims had found deeply moving words, says the chief Major Johannes Schalwig (CSU) in a report of the Nürnberg news (Monday). In front of the townhall grieving people laid down lights, flowers and photos of the deceased. The 16 year olds were very loved, says chairwoman Piegert. They went to the school in Eckenthal and Nürnberg. One of the two played the contrabass in a band.”

[translator note: The MERKUR link which tells the story of the service, headline says “TWO YOUTHS KILLED BY S-BAHN: EYE WITNESSES TRAUMATIZED – POLICE BEGINS LOOKING FOR CLUES”. I have no words.]

The Bavarian minister of the interior Joachim Herrmann demanded via BR (https://www.br.de/nachrichten/bayern/heroldsberg-nach-s-bahn-drama-in-nuernberg-unter-schock,RGRznvb):

“It is terrible. It has to be made very clearly that we must counteract these acts of violence.”

[translator note: the BR article titles the article “S-Bahn Drama. AFTER they’ve already known that it was NOT “drama”, but outright murder. I have no words.]

Most of all, our politicians has to counteract and has to educate about the dangers of islam. And it has to put a stop to the mass invasion of these mohammedans, even if in this case the offenders were born here. But all once conservative old parties are now collectively blaring up and down with the Greens and the Reds this crackbrained welcome culture tolerance lyre.

And meanwhile, Nürnberg too becomes more and more “colorful”. The families of Luca and Frederic are by no stretch of the imagination happy about this. And neither are the citizens of nearby Heroldsberg. Only completely left-retarded full fledged idiots can still be happy about the full-blown mohammedization of our country.

http://www.pi-news.net/2019/01/nuernberg-tuerke-und-grieche-stossen-drei-16-jaehrige-auf-gleis-zwei-tot/

 

Two students respond to weaponized leftist media fictions, plus updates

Posted on by

Chaperone of high-school kids:

I would like to answer the question the FOX reporter asked the Catholic School chaperone which she was unable to answer.

Article on above graphic here:

Source for image above:

More evidence for any reasonable hypothesis you may have formed from the images and information above:

Catholic Leaders Refuse to Retract Slander of School Boys at March for Life

A number of Catholic leaders and institutions who slandered a group of Catholic school boys after the annual March for Life remain silent after the boys were shown to be innocent.

A short video released on social media made it appear that a group of students from Covington Catholic High School could have accosted Native American activist Nathan Phillips, whereas more extensive footage from different angles made it clear that it was Mr. Phillips who approached the boys and began playing his drum directly in the face of one of them.

 

Videos show that the students were not propagating racist abuse, they were being victimized by it. One of the activists who confronted the group told them: “You white people go back to Europe where you came from! This is not your land!”

A lot of people have contributed to this post. I have lost track of all but Xanthippa, and Richard at this point but thank you all for your diligence and keeping track of this increasingly bizarre, yet revealing story.

I begin to think the less sense a viral story makes, the greater the importance at a level of abstraction that is perhaps, not being addressed.

Lets go back to first principles in terms of what makes a law work. Something that it’s becoming increasingly clear, the Islamic-leftist alliance did at the strategic level at least, some time ago.

In a democracy,  a bunch of us decide what is not acceptable and then pass laws to make those unacceptable things clear, and then hire people on the public purse to make sure that those who engage in those practices are caught and force is applied to them. Those who are hired to use force on behalf of the state have limits, transparency and are themselves in theory, accountable to law.

In a democracy, certainly in the US, but generally in the West, that which is not expressly forbidden is allowed. The opposite of leftism and islamic cultures/law (after all, what is law other than the formal codification of a culture, right?) where all that is allowed is expressed and all else is forbidden generally.

Freedom of speech for example is a given. People may say what they want without fear of persecution by the state, is more than a cornerstone of democracy, its the entire foundation, basement windows, plaster and paint on the inside walls and a nice stucco finish for Western democracy because controlling the flow of information is controlling what decisions people make. Every tyrant’s dream. (You indexing this Google?)

The left of course has circumnavigated that right by passing selectively enforced “hate-speech” laws, where those law enforcement officers who’s job it was to protect your rights, now really are goons for the state to make sure you practice right-speech and right-think.

But that isn’t the major force for change in the West today, although it is one of them.

First principles teach us that whatever we do or want or believe can be overcome with sufficient force applied in just the right way.

So our system gets overwhelmed with muslims demanding we not speak truthfully about Islam in a way that makes it look bad to people who do not hold the values that slavery, rape, forced marriage, genocide, terrorism, and Islamic-supremacy uber-alles are good things.

They apply force to any publication or individual that can be identified, as an example to others who might speak out of turn, thereby in effect (which is all that matters to muslims and leftists at this stage) creating new laws. We are afraid to say what we know is true, because the consequences are real and negative. This applies to questioning global-warming with actual climate science, open borders, Islam, with actual islamic history and Scripture and so on and so on. I think the example of Charlie Hebdo is a good one as its the most spectacular. But there are literally tens of thousands of examples of people who have been negatively affected for saying true things about Islam or leftist sacred cows ranging from death, to attempted murder, Lars Hedigaard and Kurt Westergaard just for two, to being fired, ostracized or losing family connections ad friends.

Examples of this are quite frequent in the last seven days and in fact, I have wanted to write about this for a while now. But what happened to these kids is too good an example to let it sit any longer. That, and the Church’s seemingly bizarre reaction to it, if you do not understand how this pope intends to destroy the Church as it has been for a very, very long time now.

Soviet Crucifix Francis, Equador commie president

In fact his behaviour is 100% consistent with someone who is trying to undermine the authority, message, and dignity of the Vatican, in much the way it appeared that Obama was trying to do to the office of president. (Fortunately for America, his fans and supporters imputed so much dignity to his presidency that this one kind of damage did not succeed) Note that the Pope denied sanctuary to an actual Catholic Pakistani who was convicted on blasphemy of Islam charges while simultaneously demanding Europe destroy itself with islamic immigration.

But back to the central thesis:

For a decade or more now, I have watched as police have moved from enforcing the law, to trying to reduce the amount of violence and injuries in a given situation. An example might be where in I think it was Sweden, and this has to be 8 years ago minimum, a pro-Israel group of Jews and non-leftists had a permit for a peaceful demo with folk style music and so on, and a large group of Muslims and leftist came and presented such a threat that the police arrested (on a catch and release basis) the legal peaceful people in order to stop what looked like it could have been an awful and violent scene.

Now you have law enforcement acting as mitigators for the real law makers. Those with the willingness and capability using the most force to a purpose.

You cannot get a permit to do something involving drawings of Mohammad, or any other point where muslims have demonstrated a willingness to use force. And of course this will increase in terms of the scope of the demands as the population of muslims increases. One of the best examples in the past few days will be to see how fast Marks and Spencer changes the Aloe leaf on their toilet paper because ONE MUSLIM said it looked like the arabic symbol for ‘Allah’.

It is unlikely they won’t. Burger King changed their packaging for soft serve ice cream because their line drawing of a soft serve ice cream cone, looked like allah to one muslim. Sony changed an entire video game because one muslim felt the music in one part of it resembled something something blasphemy islamic.

Orban recognizes this and its why he simply will not let muslims into Hungary, because there is no way you can without losing sovereignty. Muslims believe in the use of any and all means possible, especially violence and ideally lethality, to be the law and only culture in a territory. Their ideology, their central dogma demands it. There is no denying this. Read the Koran and the most authoritative Hadiths, not to mention Reliance of the Traveler, a book written in English, for muslims outside of the officially Islamic world.

And so Muslims and Leftists will use force to make damn sure that no matter what is true, fair, just or honourable, people will be afraid to stand against them.

The number of people who know that the Catholic high school kids are the real victims of this event is predictable. Generally, the headline is a lie favouring a leftist or Islamic narrative. Then the correction comes out. No “Asian” cut the little girl’s head cloth, the whole thing was a hoax, right? But only a fraction of those that know about the initial event know the truth of it, and the policies that were desired will be enacted whether the event was true or not.

 

The REAL interview of Katie Hopkins in Finland by YLE

Posted on by

This is the very near future of journalism. The legacy media simply no longer can be trusted to represent events or realty, but only the culturally-Marxist narrative.

No one but NO ONE must ever do an interview without your own people filming it from somewhere that all parties can be seen.

Below, is a video of YLE, a Finnish broadcaster, interviewing Katie Hopkins about her Finnish tour concerning the newly outed Islamic child-sex-slave gangs, but filmed by her own person.

How fun will it be to compare this to the one that gets broadcast on Finnish TV. If it does at all of course.

 

BBC provides another data point for its policy of anti-British activism.

Posted on by

Read this BBC post about an arrest of a protestor. Notice how he is named, shamed and a photo of his face is on the page before ANY charges have been laid at all. Just his arrest was all that was needed. Compare that to how they handle all the Islamic or non-White, non-indigenous-British crimes, and I mean SERIOUS crimes like forcing children into sex-slavery by torture.

Protester James Goddard held over Parliament incidents

(Photo at site)

Hardline pro-Brexit campaigner James Goddard has been arrested in connection with incidents outside Parliament on Monday.

 

Police said a man in his 30s was arrested outside St James’s Park Tube station in London just before midday.

He is being held on suspicion of a public order offence.

Mr Goddard was involved in a protest in Westminster earlier this week during which Remain-supporting Conservative MP Anna Soubry was called a Nazi.

 

A Met Police spokesman said the arrested man was currently in police custody and being taken to a central London police station.

I wonder if these “incidents” would compare to driving a car into people or attacking with a kabob knife. If memory serves, we didn’t get those people’s names on arrest or even a description when there were plenty of witnesses.

This may be an example. At no point in this lengthy article about an actual attack on Westminster do they say the attackers name although they clearly know what it is, so they can repeat: “British Born”.