Britain continues to ARREST people for RACISM for burning a BOOK because of objections to the contents

This is truly totalitarian. And worse as there are no clear laws on it. People are just supposed to know you can’t do this. If someone burned Mein Kampf one can be certain there would be no arrests. No trials, no jail.

From the Daily Mail:

Police have arrested two people on suspicion of racial hatred after a video appeared online showing a man burning a copy of the Koran.

The video, which MailOnline has chosen not to publish, shows a tattooed man standing in a kitchen complaining about being unable to start a fire.

Speaking into the camera, he says: ‘I’ve been trying to get my poxy fire started for half-hour wondering what s**t I can get it going with.’

Holding a paperback copy of the Koran up to the camera, he adds: ‘And then I found this.’

Two videos were posted on Facebook and YouTube on Tuesday and are still available today on various pages.

The second shows the man standing outside tearing pages from the holy book and throwing them on a bonfire.

He says to the camera: ‘And it worked, all I’ve got left is the poxy, sh***y cover and look, that’s on the fire as well.’

The Daily mail has decided not to publish the videos. They do publish videos of Muslims stabbing, shooting and blowing up people. But people burning the instruction book that tells believers to do these things, that is too much for the Daily Mail. Here they are:

South Park did a brave and creative attempt some years ago to solve problems like this. They put forth two ideas in a 1 episode series called, “Cartoon Wars” several years ago.

The two solutions were that people could all decide to draw Mohammad, the great taboo of that time, and then the thugs, bullies and muslim supremacists would know their tactics didn’t work and it would just go away. Or, everyone could bury their heads in the sand and hope the problem just kinda goes away on its own.

The people of South Park, just like the people of Canada and Great Britain, have decided on the bury the heads option.

This problem could be solved permanently and bloodlessly if a large fraction of the people of the UK filmed themselves burning Korans. Perhaps they could also burn a copy of some other book they find repugnant. Maybe a copy of one of Obama’s ‘autobiographies’. Or Rules for radicals. But the fact is, if enough people do it, they will have to make a law which is clear, and let people know they have lost their liberal democracy, or they will have to abandon the notion that the state can do forced mind control without bothering to tell people exactly what it is they are not allowed to say, think or do.

I was hoping to embed the South Park clip here, as it used to be on YT but there is nary a trace of it. Even the suggestion that people resits this totalitarian evolution is getting hard to find. But for those of you who know how to bit torrent, the 2 episode series of Cartoon wars, in fact all  4 or 5 banned episodes of South Park can be obtained. All of them I believe, deal with the child raping, mass murdering, slave raping Mohammad. Although they don’t mention that in South Park. They just deal with the concept of not being able to depict him, even if, and here quoting one of the characters in the show, Muslims are forbidden to draw him perhaps, but we, are not.

H/T M.

 

Sandra Solomon assaulted by ANTIFA in Winnipeg, arrests made

Details here:

A good friend of this site suggested using the title: “White men attack Muslim woman”, or, if that was too off the mark, “White men beat Arab women” and that would satisfy the full-on identity politics aspects of it.

Brilliant idea, and funny. But one is reluctant to go down that road even for the laugh. ANTIFA is nearly 100% white males with a smattering of women for the thugs to hide behind when they attack people they don’t like with bike locks etc. But the problem as we all know is not that they are white males. Its that they are various flavours of post-modernists ranging from classic Soviet commies to essentially Nazi brown shirts, and all the types of post-modernists that agree that violent revolution is what is needed to take down classical liberalism. The one true enemy they are certain of.

Sandra is an ex-Muslim and an Arab. But they attacked her because she stands against the narrative. She wants to blunt the best weapon the leftists have against us. Islam. And they won’t stand for that.

Even so, it was too funny an idea to leave alone entirely so I had to at least include it in the post. And we all do know by now, if the CBC was writing it up, they would most certainly do a spin like that if they thought they could get away with it.

Notes from NorseRadish — A Tale of Two Koreas

The other day, regular Vladtepes Blog contributor, Richard, commented about Trump’s unprecedented policy regarding North Korea with the following reply:

“President Trump knows this, this is shown in his statements that maybe South Korea and Japan should build nuclear weapons.”

Feeling inspired, I have converted my original response into the following essay:

Finally, someone at a high level is willing to tell the ugly truth, instead of the usual beautiful lies. At the very least, this is a goad being prodded into China’s ribs about North Korea. If Japan and South Korea both go nuclear, they will no longer have to rely upon America’s protective umbrella or worry about how Democrats like Clinton and 0bama fold it up whenever they get their hands on the tiller.

A nuclear-armed South Korea would send Beijing the unmistakable message that they can unilaterally impose harsh retribution should Communist China continue to prop up the NORKs (i.e., North Koreans). This also is extremely healthy for the USA because we would not have to be dragged into a nuclear conflict on the Korean peninsula if Psycho Fat Boy Kim causes things to go all pear-shaped (as the following chart details).

Similarly armed, Japan would then have its own lever to counter NORK aggression. Being able to retaliate against Red China for how it has supported Pyongyang (and its nuclear program) for all these years would definitely throw a spanner into Beijing’s gears. There is serious speculation that Japan already has several nuclear devices in an unassembled state (so as not to violate treaty agreements) which could be deployed in a few short weeks. From: “Japan Has Nuclear ‘Bomb in the Basement,’ and China Isn’t Happy“.

“Japan already has the technical capability, and has had it since the 1980s,” said the official. He said that once Japan had more than five to 10 kilograms of plutonium, the amount needed for a single weapon, it had “already gone over the threshold,” and had a nuclear deterrent.

Japan now has 9 tons of plutonium stockpiled at several locations in Japan and another 35 tons stored in France and the U.K. The material is enough to create 5,000 nuclear bombs. The country also has 1.2 tons of enriched uranium.

Technical ability doesn’t equate to a bomb, but experts suggest getting from raw plutonium to a nuclear weapon could take as little as six months after the political decision to go forward. A senior U.S. official familiar with Japanese nuclear strategy said the six-month figure for a country with Japan’s advanced nuclear engineering infrastructure was not out of the ballpark, and no expert gave an estimate of more than two years.

After all, the Japanese have been operating nuclear reactors for decades and the extraction or enrichment processes needed to make use of reactor byproducts are well within Tokyo’s technological abilities. For more information, please see: “Japan Producing Huge, Lightly Guarded Stockpile of Plutonium“.

Also, with South Korea and Japan becoming nuclear armed, they would pose a unique threat to Communist China in that, using cruise missiles (instead of SRBMs or IRBMs), either country could deploy short-range, flat trajectory tracks that are, not just extremely difficult to intercept, but have very short arrival times. It is a fairly safe bet that neither the Chinese nor the NORKs have overcome the formidable engineering challenges posed by warhead miniaturization that is necessary to reliably integrate nuclear devices with cruise missiles. From: “China’s Nuclear Subs Are Ready to Terrorize the Sea“.

“The Chinese air force’s H-6 bombers first dropped atomic bombs back in the 1970s—and modern versions of the bombers can fire cruise missiles that are compatible with nuclear warheads.

Continue Reading →

Video of police busting party for unapproved song on Youtube playlist

This is also rumoured to be the song that was playing.

I have a request for the readers of this site please.

As much as the event depicted in the top video, showing multiple police busting a British yard party for playing an unapproved song infuriates me, and should infuriate anyone with even the dimmest recollection of what personal liberty means, what infuriates me more is the submission shown to the police by people at a private party who had done nothing wrong whatsoever.

We need a new word which is the equivalent of dhimmitude, but refers to submission to post modern/Marxist authority. We need to name it so we can shame it and stop people from showing it.

People faced with authority on their own property for playing an “unapproved song” should  say to that authority, “This is my property and Ill play what ever song I want. Now get a warrant, arrest me, or get off my property”.

We must learn to show defiance. It is justified, it is our legal right, and much more importantly, it is our inherent right and obligation to show defiance to totalitarian and irrational authority.

If anyone knows of a word, perhaps a Russian or Polish or Czech word for showing obsequious submission to communist authority we could start with that. If not, lets make one up.

 

The missing Bulgarian video on the US influence on Islamic terrorists fighting in Syria

A few months ago, our Bulgarian translator did a number of very important transitions of videos for us that got pulled down from every site we put them at. It was a very frustrating experience for all of us. But the last one was really interesting and got pulled down from LiveLeak, Youtube, Vid.me and all with vague or no explanations and usually within minutes. Even minds.com which has a whole thing about not pulling things down, pulled this one down in a matter of an hour or three. No explanation.

But its been found here.

This video is a 20 minute analysis of the American influence on the Syrian war and explains an awful lot about the way Barack Husain Obama acted, or failed to act, during his time as president concerning the Islamic State and related actors. For those of you familiar with bit torrent, the same video can be grabbed using this link.

Trump makes strong statements

The debate on this will be endless. I suspect we all know what he means, and I suspect we all know what he expects. The Saudis better pay attention. They have 4 years less a few months to make it happen. For the moment, they seem happy as hell to have a man in the White House who is not an Iranian proxy as they see it. But they seem to be having the riot act read to them.

Here is the Clarion page on this.

Item 3:

3. That means honestly confronting the crisis of Islamist extremism and the Islamist terror groups it inspires. And it means standing together against the murder of innocent Muslims, the oppression of women, the persecution of Jews and the slaughter of Christians.

Most of the speech used vague, relative terms like “terrorism” and “extremism.” The focus was almost entirely on ISIS and Iran. But then came this paragraph. President Trump identified the enemy not just as Islamist terrorist groups, but the Islamist extremism foundation necessary for those groups to manifest.

Of special note is the line about “persecution of Jews.” This was not stated with some moral equivalence about how Israel shares blame for stifling the nationalist aspirations of Palestinians. No, Trump identified anti-Semitism as a central problem outside of the context of Israel. That omission is powerful.

The identification of the enemy as Islamist extremism is refreshing, but as Dr. Daniel Pipes points out, “one statement does not a policy make.” Even Obama uttered the word “jihadist” on a few rare occasions.

The framing of the enemy as Islamism should have been the focal point of the speech, rather than waiting until the middle and the end to use the term. What should have followed was a strategy, with the sticks and carrots, to uproot the sustainers of the ideology so it dissipates into history. A question is left hanging, “Now what? What changes?”

This appears to be a video of the whole speech:

Although I have not seen it all yet, I look forward to comparing it to Obama’s Cairo speech,    of which I did an analysis some years ago.

French news busts Syria “charity” as just another jihadi group

Here is a comment that came in at the same time as the original French video, also in French, and also translated for us by Ava Lon:

SUPPORT / SUPPORT PIERRE LE CORF HERE:

“Some pictures I took yesterday [10/03/2017] that will give you another perspective on white helmets and different lies from the media and governments. Truths about the war in Syria, in Aleppo. Hospitals totally destroyed and neutral helmets, heroes in Aleppo? An Oscar? A nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize? At what price will we continue to LIE and kill, to justify this war, to support terrorist groups, to keep a country on the brink of suffocation like the others before? I quickly compile some pictures that I took yesterday that will give you another perspective.

I refuse, as a French citizen, to support a criminal policy. In order to illustrate a little better what I am talking about in my letter to the President of the Republic .. while clouds of dust of war arriving from Iraq make the air almost unbreathable, in less than 2 hours I return -in image- to two hospitals in correct condition; I have to walk on tons of medicines reserved for terrorist groups and forbidden to civilians, I cross the remains of the buildings enslaved by Al-Jaïch al-hour (Free Syrian Army), Jabhat al-Nosra Al-Cham, al-Qaeda) … buildings of the White Helmets which, as the inhabitants reminded, helped mainly terrorists, civilians … when the camera turned and sometimes only, sometimes carried arms, executed Syrian soldiers , participated in executions of the Islamic courts, robbed the victims, etc. but a crucial point: almost all the members were affiliated to the terrorist groups mentioned above.

Watch the video on the white helmets of my friend Vanessa Beeley testimonials – we were together during some of these testimonies when she accompanied me to distribute the toys at the liberation. Another interesting video compiling many images that were never shown to you. My testimony is sad, there are probably some exceptions, probably some of the White Helmets were civilians with good intentions, who were under the bombs dropped off the planes (not free, it’s a war, but in response to jihadist gunfire from civilian areas fired on the only civilian areas of the west and massacring a population that accounted for 90% of Aleppo while the media was silent) helped real people who were dying because of their proximity to armed groups, who used them as human shields (even shooting from hospitals …) is a reality, but the real majority were jihadists (proved by the documents found on the spot) they were those who brought death on those who ended up under the rubble, and finally in their trucks, and in their videos, we must not forget the situations of cause and effect, it is nevertheless ironic and rather vicious.

The reality goes beyond fiction here, in this neighborhood, (all in schools that they have transformed as you can see from the beginning) the headquarters of Al Nora, the Qatar Red Crescent, the M10 hospital and above all the headquarters of the helmets are rubbing shoulders here. The video is not well mounted etc. but a picture is worth a thousand words and it is essential for you to understand the extend of lies … how much we must ask to stop support for this war as well as sanctions against the Syrian people, as a stakeholder in terrorism. Again, although I share what can be called evidence, I still do not pretend to tell you what to think, form your own opinion.

Most recent NORK provocation

It appears that North Korea has launched a missile which traveled between 600 and 700 miles, landing in the Sea of Japan. Below, a series of videos and reports that seem to be phase 1 of the “fog of war”.

At this link there is an interview with the PM of Japan, Shinzo Abe, which I cannot find on YT. He doesn’t say much outside of the usual language of the UN, protest strongly, “will send a very angry letter” but does refer to a meeting of the UN. security council.

CNN’s muffled report:

This Oz report seems to contain clearer uncertainty, free of CNN speculations. It also has some classic North Korean 1960s looking news reports of the launch.

Pentagon confirms:

New and more information will be added to this post throughout the day. Please leave links to decent info under this post.

Thank you Richard, NorseRadish, M., and all.

 

 

Venezuela enjoys the fruits of communism

Venezuelan president Maduro dancing and partying while outside…

300 injured as armoured car runs into crowd injuring 300 people

Daily Mail post here:

The Dancing video on YT

More added as they are discovered.