Category Archives: Evidence of Western countries becoming communist

A few items on Canada’s communist bill, C-22

Posted on by

1. We have seen more pushback on Bill C-22 than we have on what are arguably at least, more intrusive bills like C-4. C-4 was where the state has the right to talk your child into getting surgery and chemical regimens that would sterilize them and create medical experiments out of them, while potentially jailing parents for up to 5 years merely for attempting to talk them out of it. These procedures which are somewhat between Joseph mengele and Dr. Frankenstein. drastically raises the suicide rate and lowers the happiness rate of these children. That for us here at VTB was the most authoritarian and communist bill. Communist in that the children then belonged to the state. It should be added that Dr. Frankenstein at least had the decency to experiment on corpses. Not Children.

But the pushback against C-22 is really showing up on my various info-sources. Which is a great thing. Of course on people who don’t know about it or are not against it, they won’t see this material at all. So will logically pass over these objections as crazy conspiracy theories as they head down to the pharmacy for their 11th mRNA Covid gene therapy shot.

In the video below, he details some aspects of that bill that have been softened. These things were almost certainly trial balloons. Or perhaps more accurately, let’s call them context decoys. The way that works is, I want to pass a bill that lets me steal half your stuff and turn half your children into slaves. So my initial bill states that I can take all your stuff anytime I want and under any conditions, and your children can be herded into cattle cars for my purpose, and then after some light pushback from a few politicians, I get exactly what I wanted in the first place and maybe even a little more. Thinking about that as you listen to the video below may offer a little more clarity.

Bill C-22 Surveils Ordinary Canadians While Leaving Cartel Networks Untouched

 

OTTAWA — When The Bureau published its analysis of Bill C-2 last fall, the diagnosis was unsparing.

Ottawa had confused expansion of state power over ordinary Canadians with the enforcement tools Canada actually needs to confront the Chinese Triads, Mexican cartels, and hostile-state networks that have turned Canadian cities into operational platforms for the hemisphere’s most dangerous criminal organizations. The government has now repackaged that same flawed instinct under a new number. Bill C-22, the so-called Lawful Access Act, deserves the same verdict.

The critics arriving at that conclusion now span an extraordinary coalition. Signal, the secure messaging service used by millions of Canadians — including journalists and dissidents seeking to avoid scrutiny from hostile state spies — has warned it would rather withdraw from Canada than compromise the privacy promises it has made to its users.

Tobi Lütke, founder and chief executive of Shopify, Canada’s most important technology company, has called Bill C-22 “a huge mistake” that “may well end up dealing a death blow to Canadian tech viability,” and has publicly urged Ottawa’s Public Safety Minister to study expert opinion on the bill’s fatal flaws.

[…] That last point is not a partisan complaint. It is a warning from Canada’s most important security partner that Ottawa is about to create vulnerabilities that hostile states — the very states The Bureau has spent three years documenting as active threats on Canadian soil — will be positioned to exploit.

The above from Sam Cooper’s The Bureau. Please read the rest at the link above.

Dean of Law, Bruce Pardy discusses bull C-63 with Jordan Peterson. I think a great deal of what is said in this video can be applied to C-22 as the issues are the same. This is however, one hour and fifty minutes. So maybe it is for those who are deeply concerned with this issue. If so, again you can listen while doing other things. I will likely focus on the entire video as I do household chores because I am certain it is worth the time. This is a two year old video as well. But the actual issue, state overreach to create a totalitarian surveillance state, is as current as ever.

John Carpay on bill C-22. John Carpay is the head of the JCCF, a Canadian constitutional law firm and one of about 3 I know of that actually works towards preserving individual rights in Canada, as opposed to destroying them.

 

There were other bills that were of a similar nature, some of which included retroactive prosecution. In other words, if you had done something when it was not a crime after they passed this bill, the state could prosecute you after they passed the bill.

The videos on that are below and shot in Ottawa of John Carpay explaining the exact details. The bills died when they did not get passed by the Senate. But there have been indications that Carney intends to resurrect them, or likely draft new ones with the same intentions.

For those that like clear video, please click the little gear bottom right after you start playing the videos and select the highest option.

THIS POST may get updated with more materials on C-22 as they occur.

Communism as the Canadian modus is no longer an academic issue: All secure comms may pull out of Canada if C-22 passes

Posted on by

Bill C-22’s Groundhog Day: Why the Government’s Dismissal of Signal, Apple and the U.S. Congress Concerns Runs Back the Disastrous Online News Act Playbook

Secure messaging service Signal yesterday became the latest company to warn that Bill C-22, the lawful access bill, could force it to leave the Canadian market rather than comply with provisions it says would compromise its end-to-end encryption and create new cybersecurity risks. Signal vice-president Udbhav Tiwari told the Globe and Mail that the company “would rather pull out of the country than be compelled to compromise on the privacy promises we have made to our users.” The comments are part of a steady stream of similar warnings from Apple, Meta, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, the Cybersecurity Advisors Network, and the chairs of the U.S. House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs Committees. Despite growing concern, the government’s response has been to launch a misleading social media campaign and repeatedly insist that the experts and companies are mistaken.

The pattern will be familiar for anyone who lived through the Online News Act. Supporters of then-Bill C-18 dismissed warnings from Meta and Google that the bill’s mandated payments for news links were unworkable and that they would comply by blocking the links in Canada. Witnesses confidently told Senate committees that the companies were bluffing and that, “when legislated to do so, they will come to the table.” But by the end of summer 2023, Meta had stripped news links from Facebook and Instagram, an approach that continues to this day.

The government’s defence of Bill C-22 follows much the same script. Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree has accused the U.S. tech giants of “misinterpreting” his bill and his department insists the legislation is “encryption-neutral.” When Apple released a statement warning that the bill “could allow the Canadian government to force companies to break encryption by inserting backdoors into their products, something Apple will never do,” officials replied that it “categorically rejected” the claims. When the U.S. House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs chairs wrote that providers of end-to-end encryption “will inevitably face directives to create backdoors and architectural changes that bypass or weaken encryption,” the minister’s spokesperson said the letter reflected “a misunderstanding of how Bill C-22 would function in practice.” When Signal said it would leave, it responded that the concerns regarding installing capabilities to enable surveillance are false. In other words, the government thinks everyone is wrong and the risk of market exits are overblown.

Read the rest at the link above please.

 

Mostly on how the communist state will use AI, data points for replacement migration and the accelerating revolution in Carney’s Canada: Links post 1 for May 3rd, 2026

Posted on by

This morning, while perusing the pretend-random YouTube feed that comes up on my sandboxed YT app, I decided to watch one titled, “Why AI agents are either the best or worst thing we’ve ever built“.

It was pretty much what you may expect if you have watched a bunch of videos on AI but slightly better than average in presentation. It wasn’t political, or philosophical at all. That is until about 7 minutes in. Then the philosophical issue of agency came up. The argument ran that instead of the more or less 1950 sci-fi imaginings of a human brain/agency and robot bodies, which we have had pretty much for decades now, we are switching to robot brains/agency and human bodies.

She brought on a guest. A philosopher,  Niklas Lönnblad. I can’t tell between her accent and his name being strongly Scandinavian. Then it got interesting from our PoV.

Without using the term, ‘game-theory’ he started out by defining an aspect of it. The issue of limited time and resources hence each agency, be it a person or a state would necessarily prioritize for what goals needed to be addressed while ignoring the rest due to lack of actual agency/agents.

Time and agency will be removed from the equations of life, which means a fundamental shift. All animals factor in the time and effort required to achieve a goal. Imagine what would happen if that wasn’t a factor, and a Marxist state deployed that kind of game-change.

The example they used was, if suddenly the state, which they refer to as the government, were suddenly able, through the use of AI agents, to ticket EVERY car that went 1 KM over a speed limit, you would, as he put it, have a dictatorship within a democracy.

We clearly, clearly are approaching that exact example now without even having AI. Just speed cameras and regular old computers sending tickets to people who go over the limit based on licence plate connection to the car owner.

But the concept is worth extrapolating on, because it will be the case. The state can essentially criminalize everything and arrest or otherwise hurt any given person based on what the actual priorities of the state are, rather than a criminal justice hierarchy of crime.

In other words, they can know any minor infraction you did, and then arrest you because you denied Global Warming, or insisted on biological reality of human sexual dimorphism.

And again, this already happened in the Soviet Union as painstakingly detailed in the Gulag Archipelago decades before there were computers. Or even cell phones. But AI actually extends agency to the state to infinity. This will change a lot of equations. And might explain why Mark Carney was so adamant about building massive AI server farms as (at one point) his main campaign platform, while also BSing everyone that they all insisted on large amounts of “green electrical supply”. A lie anyone who bothered to think about it for a moment could see through instantly. No company ever cared where its power came from.

In the following excerpt from the video, the examples given of course are banal. But I would ask anyone interested enough to read this, or watch the video to extrapolate. See where this has already happened, or how it will be applied. As Mark Twain said, “History does not repeat itself. but it does Rhyme”.

“I’m not sure how to feel about this. So, we have autonomous AI agents already out there hiring humans to do their bidding, which sounds like the plot of a very bad science fiction film. But I called up my friend, the philosopher Niklas Lönnblad.

Nice, I’m so excited I get to talk to you about this. Likewise. Have you been playing around with OpenCLR? Of course I have, absolutely.

He had a different way to think about this:

Well, I think autonomy is widely overvalued, because autonomy means that it does what it wants. And we’re nowhere near designing bots that have a will of their own or agency of their own.

We call them agents, but they’re really delegates. Nature develops agency first. Intelligence is a resulting effect or emergent effect of the looping of agencies.

And then that’s how you get intelligence. Whereas we’ve done it sort of really backwards with the artificial intelligence project, where we build intelligence first. And then we’re now sort of going back to figuring out, can we do agency? What we want is to be able to delegate and extend our agency in different ways.

I think that will present a whole different class of problems for us. The troubling thing then isn’t yet that AI has too much agency, it’s that we do. Almost all societies are premised on the fact that agency is scarce.

Attention is scarce. We’re limited by time. Take a super simple example, like there is a concert and the tickets are being released.

You have people queuing up to get to this concert. And this queue works why? It works because there’s a limited amount of attention, time and agency that people can spend. Now, imagine a world in which you

can tell your agents that if there’s any concerts by this particular band and I want a ticket, so queue up for me virtually.

Suddenly there’s like this abundance of agency and the queue breaks. Think about a society where everybody can will 10 times more, 100 times more, 1000 times more. What does that mean if we increase the amount of will in society? A lot of our other concepts like justice depend on this too.

Because now flip the coin and imagine that the government has abundant agency, infinite agency. And suddenly every single violation of the law can be enforced. So imagine, for example, every time you speed and you’re three or four or five kilometres or miles per hour over the limit, you’re automatically issued a ticket.

There’s something about this full enforcement of the law through abundant government agency that actually comes very close to a dictatorship, although we’re still in a democracy. Abundant agency in the hands of governments is potentially terrifying. But what about in the hands of an individual? Because one thing that you can say about humans is that we have no shortage of ideas.

What we have is a shortage of time and energy and frankly, the will to deal with the admin. Cass (the name of the AI agent they built, short for Casandra and is the name the AI agent picked for itself) has none of those problems. And so we thought what is the most ambitious thing that we could ask her to do? Not fix a pothole, not buy paperclips.”

It continues with an interesting idea about using it to create destructive propaganda. Their example is about trying to crash a stock. People might figure it out eventually, but by then the damage is done. This also is a perfect reflection of Western nation’s reality since 2020 or before. Covid, the vaxx, global warming, all of it was Maoist mass line narrative attacks, intended to create an effect. The state becomes less interested in preserving the narrative itself once the goal, which is the damage that is done to the target, has been achieved. At 12:50 more or less, she describes tasking an AI agent to create a mass line narrative attack in order to tank a stock. Again, extrapolate forwards, and interpolate backwards to see how this was already done to damage individualism. What is the multiplier on this effect AI will have, going forwards?

She also touches on another of Stephen Coughlin’s themes. Ultimately, the damage is done to trust in the systems altogether. This is what Stephen calls, “The liquification of reality”. A total destruction of our own ability to make decisions on any of the information coming our way.

(As a complete aside, for anyone looking for a temporary solution to the immediate problem of same, it is easy. Stop watching TV and stop listening to news on radio. Especially in Canada. For people who say, “Where will I get my news” the answer is easy, You are not getting news now. For information, search X. When you see anything interesting, query Grok, X’s AI agent as to the date and trtuth of the Tweet in question. So far I have found it to be on the whole, very good for that.)

Interestingly Canada is still preserving the Trans-narrative attack in spades, along with several others. Many thinkers are claiming that Canada is dropping the Global Warming narrative attack because no one believes it anymore.

Untrue on both counts. The elbows up crowd still chant it like life depends on it, and the state doesn’t give a rats kidney if people believe it or not. They are happy to have their useful idiots out on the street pushing these narratives, but they don’t care who believes them. They just care that people are afraid to oppose them. Because, as we often say, “with the left, the point is never the point. The revolution is always the point.” -David Horowitz Obama’s Rules for Revolution/Diana West.

Arguing against the narratives is ignoring the intent of them. And inadvertently working for the enemy, unless one includes the telos of the narrative. The effect the narrative will have on individualism and classical thought.

On to the list of indicators of the state of Western nations:

1. A decent example of Canada moving from a nation of rule of law to a dialectically driven, narrative based state

Click through to read the entire commentary.

2. Multiculturalism in Spain is going as expected

Also comments under that one.

3. This, like similar programs, are great for getting a few people that don’t already know what is happening with Islam especially in Gaza to wake up to the facts. People who are committed to the Islamic and ‘Palestinian’ cause of course, would just agree with the training and propaganda. it would make no difference to them. but at the end of the day, none of that matters. What does matter is: A: Do we have faith in our own right to exist, our culture, our beliefs, our history and B: are we ready to fight for it with the requisite amount of force and sacrifice to win.

Generally speaking I would say no. Most do not believe in either, and those that do believe in A are not ready to believe in B.

4. Ezra follows up with the whole Rocket Launch pad con that the Fed Guv and the socialist Nova Scotia provincial government set up. Of course most news that bothers to report on this at all, say, CBC, CTV and Global, IF they bother to write on this, will frame it as incompetence, or at worst corruption. But what they won’t ever say, is where the money goes. I would argue it goes to hotels and caterers who house, feed and otherwise pander to all the needs of the endless supply of Africans and Muslims being brought in to Canada and housed at Holiday Inns (at least one I know of in Ottawa’s East End) to replace liberty minded Canadians and deracinate Canadian-ness.

 

5. The political state of Canada. Watch all of these for a decent snapshot of how Carney and the WEF/Bilderberg revolution is coming along.

I wonder if the USA will have an issue with Canada deciding that Taiwan is rightfully Chinese now.

Passed Fact Check:

 

Thank you all for checking out this site.

A little something to add to the pile of the Global Warming narrative damage data.

Lastly, PLEASE if you are in or near Ottawa on Tuesday, don’t forget about this event!

There will be a Town-Hall with all the speakers in a panel and I think taking questions from the public Tuesday evening as well. The location is very central to downtown and there is parking not far away.

 

Glenn Beck on the state of Canadian ‘Democracy’

Posted on by

Every word he says is accurate as far as we can recall. If anyone finds an error please post it in the comments.

RFK Jr. offered a few words on Canada’s MAiD program as well.

Although the following thing seems relatively trivial, it goes to the deracination of Canadian history and culture.

Some of you might have seen photos in the banner of a number of guards in front of the Governor General’s estates in Ottawa taken a couple of years ago at a Changing of the Guard ceremony. It used to take place every and all summer with some frequency. It did not happen last year at it appears that it will not this year, as the little guard huts placed in front of the GG gates are no longer there.

The banner photos show the traditional Bear Skin tall hats (now synthetic) the guards wear and the bright red tunics and black pants they wore as well as some with a Scottish military Kilt on other guards.

We will check if this still takes place downtown, but even that ceremony, the main one, was scaled back dramatically last time we checked.

The modus of Canadian state operations

Posted on by

Glenn Beck on the story that should have dominated all Canadian media for a year or more till it was resolved:

Flash forward to today, April 23rd, 2026:

Sorry for the stupid title. I don’t want to say “democracy” because Canada is becoming a perfect example of a democracy, just not a republic. But people would say we are not a republic. Glenn Beck’s description, what is needed to be a free country is probably the simplest language. But the videos speak for themselves. How Canada actually functions, both in terms of individualism, and how well the public is represented in the machinery of government. Which is to say it isn’t.

Ontario:

Ford government passes budget that lets premier and ministers keep office records secret

The Ford government has passed a spring budget that includes provisions to let the premier and his cabinet ministers keep all their office records secret.

The spring budget changes Freedom of Information laws retroactively as well, meaning Premier Doug Ford would no longer have to comply with a court order to release his cellphone records.

The government used its majority to fast-track the bill and skip public hearings.

The FOI changes were first announced back in March and followed the loss of a court battle over access to Ford’s phone records.

The premier regularly gives out his personal cellphone number to the public and uses the device to conduct government business.

A court ruled in January that Ford must release logs of government-related calls made on his cellphone to comply with a Freedom of Information Request filed by Global News and supported by the Information and Privacy Commissioner.

 

On Mark Carney, The Communist Chinese state, and former diplomat, Hungarian Canadian, Michael Kovrig’s deep concerns for Canada’s future

Posted on by

Before even watching this video, please go over to RAIR Foundation and read the fundamentals of this situation. A man who was a prisoner of the Communist Chinese due to arbitrary arrest, as a Canadian Diplomat! was purely retaliatory for putting the daughter of a Chinese military general and owner of Huawei under house arrest for a while.

In the person of Mr. Kovrig, we have a rare combination of understanding at the strategic level, diplomatic experience in both good and bad ways, (as a prisoner in China) and as we see in this video below, also an understanding of the philosophical threat that China presents.

“The critical thing to understand […] is that Western countries, particularly democracies have policies and plans. (the) Chinese Communist Party has narratives. And the narrative it is trying to build is of inevitable preeminence and centrality in shaping both its region and ultimately world order.”

That, is the New. World. Order that Carney is proud of joining.

Protest on Parliament Hill over bill C-9: The end of all free speech and therefore end of all democratic process

Posted on by

The following videos are the speeches given on Parliament Hill on March 12th by Constitutional lawyers, pastors, Members of Federal Parliament, activists and the head of the Christian Heritage Party concerning Bill C9. One of a tranche of totalitarian bills aimed at eviscerating all the most basic rights of anything like a republic in Canada. Speech which counters any state narrative will be actually criminal, instead of the extra judicial punishments the state has used so far such as doxxing and use of Jacobins like ANTIFA to punish those dare oppose each or any narrative attack.

Please watch them all. Each of these speakers covers a component of the issue. Spread them around to those you know that are unaware of the problem, or are on the fence on the issue.

Write up on each speaker at RAIR Foundation.

1. Christine Van Guyn. Canadian Constitutional Lawyer, interim Director.

2. Rod Taylor: Christian Democrat Party leader

3. Rev. Joel Dykstra: United Reformed Church

4. Colin Postma

5. Paul Lawton: Dir. Grass Roots Action for Upper canada

6. MP Jacob Mantle plus 8 other MPs (Cons,)

7. MP Andrew Lawton:

Gov’t whistleblower on Canadian Covid and Vaxx injury stats goes on trial today for ratting out the state

Posted on by

This is an excellent exemplar of how the state in Canada treats whistleblowers.

A PhD in statistics who is/was with the Canadian government attempted to warn Canadians that they are being deceived by the state in terms of the actual data on Covid, and the mRNA injections.

He is not being put n trial because he is wrong. He is being put on trial because he told a state secret. If it was to an enemy, say, China or Iran, then OK. But it was to Canadians about how the state was deceiving them on a matter of life and death.

First, watch this video on the situation:

Then watch this:

Now I have not done this since this video was released. But I did do exactly what you see in the video below and it gave the EXACT results you see in this video. It is les than 3 minutes and it is VERY important.

So we have two important take aways here. We have PROOF the state hid the dangers of the vaxx, and proof they lied about the dangers of Covid itself.

But we also know that the thin veneer of transparency the state pretends to, is nonsense. When a whistleblower comes forward with evidence that the state is harming the public, he is charged with something, anything that will hurt him, without ever having to deal with the truth of what  he revealed.

The state of course knows they would lose on the basis of the facts so they attack on some peripheral issue.

I have witnessed this exact method being used by the Ontario College of Surgeons and Physicians, as well as the police hearings against Helen Grus, who didn’t even make it to the Whistleblower stage. Ironically we can thank CBC for that, as they blackmailed the police to prosecute her for her investigation into deaths of nursing babies of vaccinated mothers.

In all cases, there was no discussion of the facts which mattered allowed. In fact at one point, the hearing officer at the Helen Grus case jumped out of his chair, stood in front of Helen Grus and between her and her lawyer, and demanded that she not answer a question from her lawyer about how many babies had died during the period in question.

Please think about this post. What we are demonstrating here is really central to the nature of the state in Canada. How it really operates. What its real purpose is. The methodology it used to achieve goals which it does not state, but it clearly achieves. And after a little thought, hopefully you will see how you should deal with any information that comes to you through legacy media such as CBC, CTV and Global ‘news’. These are agents of state propaganda, Not sources of face-value information.

 

The full 1984ing of Great Britain is moving from the abstract and obvious to the blunt force and obvious: Anyone watching?

Posted on by

1. First, please understand the contents of this Tweet. Don’t skim this one. Think it through.

?? The Ministry of Justice has ordered the deletion of the UK’s largest court reporting archive.

Courtsdesk, a platform launched to improve media access to magistrates’ court data has been ordered to delete its archive of records by David Lammy’s Ministry of Justice.

According to Courtsdesk, the platform has since been used by more than 1,500 journalists from 39 media organisations and the data provided has highlighted serious failures in the courts system.

It said journalists were given no advance notice of 1.6 million criminal hearings, the number of court cases listed was accurate on just 4.2 per cent of sitting days and half a million weekend cases were heard with no notification to the press.

In November, HM Courts and Tribunal Service issued the company a cessation notice, citing what it called “unauthorised sharing” of court data, on the basis of a test feature, claiming this was a “data protection issue.”

Enda Leahy, the Courtsdesk chief executive said: “We built the only system that could tell journalists what was actually happening in the criminal courts.

We wrote 16 times asking for dialogue. Last week we got our answer: delete everything. If the government were interested in open justice, they would engage in a dialogue.”

Follow:
@europa

So what does this mean? Well, it’s self explanatory. But is it equal across the board? Of course not. Dialectical societies use information like a shape charge. It destroys whatever the target du jour is.

2. This goes a long way to explaining it.

3. More on this exact thing. a demand for the data on Muslim sex slavery gangs and harems of white British girls.

4. Winston Smith’s job description at the Ministry of Truth, or MINITRU as they preferred to be called, according to Chat GPT

Winston worked in the Records Department at MINITRU, where his task was to:

  • Rewrite past newspaper articles

  • Alter historical records

  • Correct “errors” in previous Party statements

  • Ensure the past always matched the Party’s current claims

If the Party said something yesterday that later proved wrong, Winston’s job was to change the past so it looked like the Party had always been right.

How he did it

  • He received instructions through pneumatic tubes

  • He edited text using a speak-write machine

  • The original records were destroyed in a “memory hole” (incinerator system)

  • The revised version became the official truth

The deeper purpose

His job wasn’t just clerical — it was ideological:

  • To make objective truth disappear

  • To ensure reality depended on Party control

  • To enforce the principle: “Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.”

I bolded and made red one of the points in the description. In Ontario, there are directives to get rid of any book prior to when cultural-Marxism entered the mainstream, This is taking place across the West, showing that the book, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury should also be understood for its messaging and as a prescription to help keep ideas and truth as literature alive such that one day when the dialectic state defeats itself, reality as a governing principle for the state and for ourselves as individuals can be restored.

“There is a German proverb: ‘Mut verloren — alles verloren’ (When courage is lost, all is lost). There is also a Latin saying: the loss of reason is the true harbinger of destruction. What happens to a society when both these losses — the loss of courage and the loss of reason — intersect? This is the picture which I have found the West presents today.”

From Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s 1978 Harvard commencement address, titled:

“A World Split Apart.”

 

The UK, in its rush to go full Soviet, is passing laws that will criminalize casual speech in a bar, and penalize bartenders and waitresses if they fail to report you for it

Posted on by

Those who have not yet read The Gulag Archipelago. and or 1984, may want to start right away.

One of the fascinating aspects of the Gulag Archipelago, is the occasional use of the word, Dialectics. At one point, in book 1, section 1, Page 100-101 it is explained that a dialectic is kind of an equivalent of a Fatwa. It is a decree of something ludicrously untrue and destructive to your person and liberties but must be obeyed. At this point, Islam, 1984 in its portrayal of communism and The Gulag Archipelago in its matter of fact description of communism as it actually operated in real time in front of the author and his witnesses, intersect perfectly.

It turns out that in that terrible year Andrei Yanuaryevich (one longs to blurt out, “Jaguaryevich”) Vyshinsky, availing himself of the most flexible dialectics (of a sort nowadays not permitted either Soviet citizens or electronic calculators, since to them yes is yes and no is no), pointed out in a report which

became famous in certain circles that it is never possible for The Interrogation mortal men to establish absolute truth, but relative truth only. He then proceeded to a further step, which jurists of the last two thousand years had not been willing to take: that the truth established by interrogation and trial could not be absolute, but only,

so to speak, relative. Therefore, when we sign a sentence ordering someone to be shot we can never be absolutely certain, but only approximately, in view of certain hypotheses, and in a certain sense, that we are punishing a guilty person.8 Thence arose the most practical conclusion: that it was useless to seek absolute evidence–for evidence is always relative-or unchallengeable

witnesses-for they can say different things at different times. The proofs of guilt were relative, approximate, and the interrogator could find them, even when there was no evidence and no witness, without leaving his office, “basing his conclusions not only on his own intellect but also on his Party sensitivity, his moral forces” (in other words, the superiority of someone who has slept well, has been well fed, and has not been beaten up)

For me at least, this compares perfectly with the part of 1984 where it is explained in Goldstein’s Book:

In philosophy, or religion, or ethics, or politics, two and two might make five, but when one was designing a gun or an aeroplane they had to make four.

 

And now in the UK, some of the most astonishing narrative enforcement measures ever in that ancient kingdom.

Having said that, as a Canadian, I have been extremely careful what I say near a waiter or waitress, because at this point the left has been so inculcated with hate, certainty and entitlement already, that while they may not as yet be able to call the police on you, what they can do to your food or drinks may be worse. So situational awareness all around please ladies and gentlemen.

Mark Carney in China promises new era of STRATEGIC partnership with Communist Chinese, and a NEW – WORLD – ORDER

Posted on by

All you people with Trump Derangement Syndrome, or as we think of it, those who participate in the state run “two minutes of hate” which is pretty much continuous in Canadian state media, the consequences of this are on you.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, it is also on us. Except maybe Alberta. Or if President Trump somehow does manage to create a 51st state with Canada, and thereby restore something of an individualist republic.

Equally concerning is what Carney means when he uses the word, “stability”. For some reason my secret dialectic to English decoder ring heard that as “increased oppression to the point of no resistance”.

One may suspect that Carney used the word, “stability” as a synonym for social cohesion.

 

Short segment of The Gulag Archipelago: The nature of crime in a communist polity

Posted on by

Solzhenitsyn’s book is maybe one of the most important documents in political history.

People tend to write about the unusual, and ignore the normal, no matter how recently the bizarre became normalized.

As a result, we don’t have as many records of things from the past that reflect the day to day reality.

Just for an example, as a bird photographer among a group of bird photographers, we really don’t have many, if any, pictures of pigeons, starlings, crows or the myriad of little brown birds all over the place, but tend to focus on the rare, bizarre, magnificent or beautiful ones that take effort to find and get a decent photo of.

The Gulag Archipelago is the day to day machinations of a communist society. It is an amazingly powerful read if you are looking for the signs of growing totalitarianism in order to properly estimate your personal, or collective cost-benefit to fighting back against a state, increasingly divorcing itself from the interests of the people in general. More accurately, a power structure that increasingly oppresses the public, rather than solves problems or is an administrator of basis systems for them.

Like reading 1984 today, these books suddenly make sense as our personal experience begins to overlap with the frame of reference of the authors of the books. And no, this isn’t a good thing in terms of what is happening to us. Not having to read a map is good. But having one when you are lost is also good. And that is what these books are.

In this segment, there is a string of descriptions of arbitrary arrests and the reasons given for them. It is a very small sample of the ones in Alexander’s book, which is a very very small sample of the ones that actually took place. But I chose to truncate this file because the last one seems eerily like a string of recent arrests in the UK.

I’ll leave it up to the reader to decide what relationship, if any, these two cases have with each other. Not to mention the other 30 odd arrests every day in the UK for thought crimes. Many of which are posted here, and many more are on X.

 

 

 

Mark Carney and the New Soviet style block of Canada and the EU

Posted on by

A couple of things about Mark Carney, now that the Soviet past of Kier Starmer has been exposed by the Daily Mail. (See our post from a few days ago)

A little note here before we get going on this list of prima facia evidences that a communist takeover of Western nations has taken place. A couple of the reasons people do not believe it, or cannot take it seriously, is that A. They do not know what communism is, and when their associates, friends and even relatives who escaped from behind the Iron Curtain try and tell them why they risked life and limb, left their families and friends and careers/jobs to risk it all in a free country, they are looked on as eccentric foreigners who don’t know anything about their countries of origins. I know. I remember thinking that way about a Christian Lebanese man who ran a diner back in the 70s and had a complete meltdown at me in his restaurant when I gave him some relativist garbage about Islam and Lebanon. Guess who was right there? HINT: It wasn’t the sanctimonious Canadian kid.
B. Because people cannot comprehend that subversion and infiltration could happen at the highest levels. For them I would recommend reading Diana West’s books, The Red Thread and American Betrayal.

And if that doesn’t do it, and it won’t because no one will actually read those books unless they are already receptive to the idea that the US has in fact been heavily penetrated by the COMINTERN already, then get the book by an ex Soviet ‘influencer’ at a very high level who had an actual epiphany and became a Patriot and a Christian, The Whitaker Chambers book called Witness. This reads like a spy novel as Whitaker was actually an excellent writer of propaganda for the Soviets, so when he decided to tell the truth about his life and subversive activities, he made it a very interesting and easy read.

And if you can’t get people to try any of those, this is a free audio book on YouTube called. School of Darkness, by soviet agent, Bella Dodd about the work she did to destroy the US by having pedophiles and homosexuals join the Catholic Church as clergy and creating teacher’s unions for the sole purpose of transforming schools into Communist indoctrination centres. She also repeatedly mentions the effort the COMINTERN put, into electing a Democrat President FOUR TIMES IN A ROW. This is a worthy book. For those that know how, download it to your phones or load it on your phones and listen while doing errands or walking the dog or what have you. This is communist subversion as it actually happened 101. Unlike Yuri Bezmenov and for that matter, George Orwell who tried to tell us how it will happen and what it will be like when it does respectively.

Lastly, in the UK during the Cold War, the head, the top guy, of one of the most mission critical British intelligence agencies, Sir Roger Hollis, Director-General of MI5 (1956–1965) was a Soviet mole. He taunted the Brits by having a photo in his office of the Ural Mountains taken from the wrong side. And although that was never proven, all the accusations fit like a glove. But Kim Philby, of MI6 (SIS) Head of the Anti-Soviet section actually was 100% PROVEN to be a Soviet mole.

  • A fully recruited KGB agent from the 1930s

  • A member of the Cambridge Five spy ring

  • The head of MI6’s anti-Soviet division, while secretly working for the Soviets

  • Personally responsible for the deaths of Western agents after he exposed them

  • Officially confirmed by the Soviet government after his defection

  • Awarded the Order of Lenin in Moscow

  • Buried with full KGB honours

He admitted his espionage publicly in 1967.

Now back to Mark Carney:

“Liberals” have snuck in a Digital ID app out of nowhere

As a partial aside, Moose mentions the Century Initiative and connects Mark Carney to it, but missed this, when Carney was a guest speaker at least year’s meeting.

The EU is a communist entity, like the UN. And suddenly Carney’s antipathy to the US makes perfect sense. He clearly WANTED to have a reason to disengage with the US specifically in order to become part of the new COMINTERN entity, the EU and UN. The US is resisting that for the moment. Watch the video above. Although this is not so much about Carney making money. This is about destroying your most fundamental liberties, even in your own head.

From 1984:

The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression
for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc,
but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that
when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten,
a heretical thought–that is, a thought diverging from the principles of
Ingsoc–should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is
dependent on words. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and
often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could
properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the
possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly
by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable
words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and
so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever. To give a single
example. The word FREE still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be
used in such statements as ‘This dog is free from lice’ or ‘This field is
free from weeds’. It could not be used in its old sense of ‘politically
free’ or ‘intellectually free’ since political and intellectual freedom no
longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless.
Quite apart from the suppression of definitely heretical words, reduction
of vocabulary was regarded as an end in itself, and no word that could be
dispensed with was allowed to survive. Newspeak was designed not to extend
but to DIMINISH the range of thought, and this purpose was indirectly
assisted by cutting the choice of words down to a minimum.

We see this already in action. Talk to anyone who believes in a state narrative such as CO2 produced by human industry is destroying the climate, or conversely talk to anyone who buys into the various narratives that the mRNA injections were an untested experimental gene therapy or that there are no mass graves at residential schools etc. etc. ad nauseam. You will see how within their own heads they already cannot process information that is in opposition to narrative beliefs, even if you show them proof from climatologists or Pfizer itself, or the staggering lack of proof of residential graves and the total unwillingness to actually try to find any.

Now I have NOT Fact checked this following video. It intuitively tracks, and most likely enough of it is factual for its purpose, whatever it is. But it is worth watching. And if ANYONE knows for a fact that any of the claims in this video are true, or not true, or true with a qualifier PLEASE leave your observations in the comments. Some of this is easy public record though, so well worth posting. The thesis of this post of course is that Carney is a central component of the Western COMINTERN effort to take down individualist society, as he pretty much says in his own book albeit not directly. Instead he says Capitalism is the problem with the West and that Marx, Engles and Lenin are his inspiration. So this video belongs here.

From the National Post article linked above:

 

Helen Grus speaks at first public event since charges 3 years ago

Posted on by

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first event that Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus has spoken at herself about the charges she faced within the police department for daring to investigate the mRNA injections as a possible cause of a dramatic uptick in infant baby deaths.

The synopsis of these videos can be read at RAIR Foundation, and a solid background can also be read at RAIR in this series of articles.

But these videos tell the story brilliantly.

Former Ottawa Policeman, Rob Stocki gives an excellent background of the situation, as well as an analysis of the state of policing.

Helen Grus herself for the first time in Public.

And retired Toronto Police Detective, Donald Best who has followed this story from the very beginning sent in a short but punchy video on the change of the entire philosophy of policing in Canada now.

A good video on what digital ID is, and how it already being used for tyranny in multiple countries

Posted on by

Please watch every word of this. I will likely go through it once or twice more to try and extrapolate to what this system of digital ID is meant to do. One suspects that it will make cash pointless as well. A store will have all their inventory tracked all the time. Everyone they sell to will be logged. The state will know everything everyone bought. Selling to someone for cash will be a crime, and cash could quite easily itself become a crime to use.Or if you have to show digital ID to use cash if it isn’t then what is the point of using cash? I dunno I need to watch this and think on it some more.

And good luck organizing a counter narrative protest of any kind in the future. Any protests that do take place, will likely be state sponsored. As nearly all of them are now.

The most chilling moment from our perspective was when he said that in Georgia, (I believe he said) they used it to freeze bank accounts and other services of lawyers who represented clients that are accused of acting counter to state interests. So the right of a defence, poof. Gone.