The modus of Canadian state operations

Glenn Beck on the story that should have dominated all Canadian media for a year or more till it was resolved:

Flash forward to today, April 23rd, 2026:

Sorry for the stupid title. I don’t want to say “democracy” because Canada is becoming a perfect example of a democracy, just not a republic. But people would say we are not a republic. Glenn Beck’s description, what is needed to be a free country is probably the simplest language. But the videos speak for themselves. How Canada actually functions, both in terms of individualism, and how well the public is represented in the machinery of government. Which is to say it isn’t.

Ontario:

Ford government passes budget that lets premier and ministers keep office records secret

The Ford government has passed a spring budget that includes provisions to let the premier and his cabinet ministers keep all their office records secret.

The spring budget changes Freedom of Information laws retroactively as well, meaning Premier Doug Ford would no longer have to comply with a court order to release his cellphone records.

The government used its majority to fast-track the bill and skip public hearings.

The FOI changes were first announced back in March and followed the loss of a court battle over access to Ford’s phone records.

The premier regularly gives out his personal cellphone number to the public and uses the device to conduct government business.

A court ruled in January that Ford must release logs of government-related calls made on his cellphone to comply with a Freedom of Information Request filed by Global News and supported by the Information and Privacy Commissioner.

 

On Mark Carney, The Communist Chinese state, and former diplomat, Hungarian Canadian, Michael Kovrig’s deep concerns for Canada’s future

Before even watching this video, please go over to RAIR Foundation and read the fundamentals of this situation. A man who was a prisoner of the Communist Chinese due to arbitrary arrest, as a Canadian Diplomat! was purely retaliatory for putting the daughter of a Chinese military general and owner of Huawei under house arrest for a while.

In the person of Mr. Kovrig, we have a rare combination of understanding at the strategic level, diplomatic experience in both good and bad ways, (as a prisoner in China) and as we see in this video below, also an understanding of the philosophical threat that China presents.

“The critical thing to understand […] is that Western countries, particularly democracies have policies and plans. (the) Chinese Communist Party has narratives. And the narrative it is trying to build is of inevitable preeminence and centrality in shaping both its region and ultimately world order.”

That, is the New. World. Order that Carney is proud of joining.

Protest on Parliament Hill over bill C-9: The end of all free speech and therefore end of all democratic process

The following videos are the speeches given on Parliament Hill on March 12th by Constitutional lawyers, pastors, Members of Federal Parliament, activists and the head of the Christian Heritage Party concerning Bill C9. One of a tranche of totalitarian bills aimed at eviscerating all the most basic rights of anything like a republic in Canada. Speech which counters any state narrative will be actually criminal, instead of the extra judicial punishments the state has used so far such as doxxing and use of Jacobins like ANTIFA to punish those dare oppose each or any narrative attack.

Please watch them all. Each of these speakers covers a component of the issue. Spread them around to those you know that are unaware of the problem, or are on the fence on the issue.

Write up on each speaker at RAIR Foundation.

1. Christine Van Guyn. Canadian Constitutional Lawyer, interim Director.

2. Rod Taylor: Christian Democrat Party leader

3. Rev. Joel Dykstra: United Reformed Church

4. Colin Postma

5. Paul Lawton: Dir. Grass Roots Action for Upper canada

6. MP Jacob Mantle plus 8 other MPs (Cons,)

7. MP Andrew Lawton:

Gov’t whistleblower on Canadian Covid and Vaxx injury stats goes on trial today for ratting out the state

This is an excellent exemplar of how the state in Canada treats whistleblowers.

A PhD in statistics who is/was with the Canadian government attempted to warn Canadians that they are being deceived by the state in terms of the actual data on Covid, and the mRNA injections.

He is not being put n trial because he is wrong. He is being put on trial because he told a state secret. If it was to an enemy, say, China or Iran, then OK. But it was to Canadians about how the state was deceiving them on a matter of life and death.

First, watch this video on the situation:

Then watch this:

Now I have not done this since this video was released. But I did do exactly what you see in the video below and it gave the EXACT results you see in this video. It is les than 3 minutes and it is VERY important.

So we have two important take aways here. We have PROOF the state hid the dangers of the vaxx, and proof they lied about the dangers of Covid itself.

But we also know that the thin veneer of transparency the state pretends to, is nonsense. When a whistleblower comes forward with evidence that the state is harming the public, he is charged with something, anything that will hurt him, without ever having to deal with the truth of what  he revealed.

The state of course knows they would lose on the basis of the facts so they attack on some peripheral issue.

I have witnessed this exact method being used by the Ontario College of Surgeons and Physicians, as well as the police hearings against Helen Grus, who didn’t even make it to the Whistleblower stage. Ironically we can thank CBC for that, as they blackmailed the police to prosecute her for her investigation into deaths of nursing babies of vaccinated mothers.

In all cases, there was no discussion of the facts which mattered allowed. In fact at one point, the hearing officer at the Helen Grus case jumped out of his chair, stood in front of Helen Grus and between her and her lawyer, and demanded that she not answer a question from her lawyer about how many babies had died during the period in question.

Please think about this post. What we are demonstrating here is really central to the nature of the state in Canada. How it really operates. What its real purpose is. The methodology it used to achieve goals which it does not state, but it clearly achieves. And after a little thought, hopefully you will see how you should deal with any information that comes to you through legacy media such as CBC, CTV and Global ‘news’. These are agents of state propaganda, Not sources of face-value information.

 

The full 1984ing of Great Britain is moving from the abstract and obvious to the blunt force and obvious: Anyone watching?

1. First, please understand the contents of this Tweet. Don’t skim this one. Think it through.

?? The Ministry of Justice has ordered the deletion of the UK’s largest court reporting archive.

Courtsdesk, a platform launched to improve media access to magistrates’ court data has been ordered to delete its archive of records by David Lammy’s Ministry of Justice.

According to Courtsdesk, the platform has since been used by more than 1,500 journalists from 39 media organisations and the data provided has highlighted serious failures in the courts system.

It said journalists were given no advance notice of 1.6 million criminal hearings, the number of court cases listed was accurate on just 4.2 per cent of sitting days and half a million weekend cases were heard with no notification to the press.

In November, HM Courts and Tribunal Service issued the company a cessation notice, citing what it called “unauthorised sharing” of court data, on the basis of a test feature, claiming this was a “data protection issue.”

Enda Leahy, the Courtsdesk chief executive said: “We built the only system that could tell journalists what was actually happening in the criminal courts.

We wrote 16 times asking for dialogue. Last week we got our answer: delete everything. If the government were interested in open justice, they would engage in a dialogue.”

Follow:
@europa

So what does this mean? Well, it’s self explanatory. But is it equal across the board? Of course not. Dialectical societies use information like a shape charge. It destroys whatever the target du jour is.

2. This goes a long way to explaining it.

3. More on this exact thing. a demand for the data on Muslim sex slavery gangs and harems of white British girls.

4. Winston Smith’s job description at the Ministry of Truth, or MINITRU as they preferred to be called, according to Chat GPT

Winston worked in the Records Department at MINITRU, where his task was to:

  • Rewrite past newspaper articles

  • Alter historical records

  • Correct “errors” in previous Party statements

  • Ensure the past always matched the Party’s current claims

If the Party said something yesterday that later proved wrong, Winston’s job was to change the past so it looked like the Party had always been right.


How he did it

  • He received instructions through pneumatic tubes

  • He edited text using a speak-write machine

  • The original records were destroyed in a “memory hole” (incinerator system)

  • The revised version became the official truth


The deeper purpose

His job wasn’t just clerical — it was ideological:

  • To make objective truth disappear

  • To ensure reality depended on Party control

  • To enforce the principle: “Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.”


I bolded and made red one of the points in the description. In Ontario, there are directives to get rid of any book prior to when cultural-Marxism entered the mainstream, This is taking place across the West, showing that the book, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury should also be understood for its messaging and as a prescription to help keep ideas and truth as literature alive such that one day when the dialectic state defeats itself, reality as a governing principle for the state and for ourselves as individuals can be restored.

“There is a German proverb: ‘Mut verloren — alles verloren’ (When courage is lost, all is lost). There is also a Latin saying: the loss of reason is the true harbinger of destruction. What happens to a society when both these losses — the loss of courage and the loss of reason — intersect? This is the picture which I have found the West presents today.”

From Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s 1978 Harvard commencement address, titled:

“A World Split Apart.”

 

The UK, in its rush to go full Soviet, is passing laws that will criminalize casual speech in a bar, and penalize bartenders and waitresses if they fail to report you for it

Those who have not yet read The Gulag Archipelago. and or 1984, may want to start right away.

One of the fascinating aspects of the Gulag Archipelago, is the occasional use of the word, Dialectics. At one point, in book 1, section 1, Page 100-101 it is explained that a dialectic is kind of an equivalent of a Fatwa. It is a decree of something ludicrously untrue and destructive to your person and liberties but must be obeyed. At this point, Islam, 1984 in its portrayal of communism and The Gulag Archipelago in its matter of fact description of communism as it actually operated in real time in front of the author and his witnesses, intersect perfectly.

It turns out that in that terrible year Andrei Yanuaryevich (one longs to blurt out, “Jaguaryevich”) Vyshinsky, availing himself of the most flexible dialectics (of a sort nowadays not permitted either Soviet citizens or electronic calculators, since to them yes is yes and no is no), pointed out in a report which

became famous in certain circles that it is never possible for The Interrogation mortal men to establish absolute truth, but relative truth only. He then proceeded to a further step, which jurists of the last two thousand years had not been willing to take: that the truth established by interrogation and trial could not be absolute, but only,

so to speak, relative. Therefore, when we sign a sentence ordering someone to be shot we can never be absolutely certain, but only approximately, in view of certain hypotheses, and in a certain sense, that we are punishing a guilty person.8 Thence arose the most practical conclusion: that it was useless to seek absolute evidence–for evidence is always relative-or unchallengeable

witnesses-for they can say different things at different times. The proofs of guilt were relative, approximate, and the interrogator could find them, even when there was no evidence and no witness, without leaving his office, “basing his conclusions not only on his own intellect but also on his Party sensitivity, his moral forces” (in other words, the superiority of someone who has slept well, has been well fed, and has not been beaten up)

For me at least, this compares perfectly with the part of 1984 where it is explained in Goldstein’s Book:

In philosophy, or religion, or ethics, or politics, two and two might make five, but when one was designing a gun or an aeroplane they had to make four.

 

And now in the UK, some of the most astonishing narrative enforcement measures ever in that ancient kingdom.

Having said that, as a Canadian, I have been extremely careful what I say near a waiter or waitress, because at this point the left has been so inculcated with hate, certainty and entitlement already, that while they may not as yet be able to call the police on you, what they can do to your food or drinks may be worse. So situational awareness all around please ladies and gentlemen.

Mark Carney in China promises new era of STRATEGIC partnership with Communist Chinese, and a NEW – WORLD – ORDER

All you people with Trump Derangement Syndrome, or as we think of it, those who participate in the state run “two minutes of hate” which is pretty much continuous in Canadian state media, the consequences of this are on you.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, it is also on us. Except maybe Alberta. Or if President Trump somehow does manage to create a 51st state with Canada, and thereby restore something of an individualist republic.

Equally concerning is what Carney means when he uses the word, “stability”. For some reason my secret dialectic to English decoder ring heard that as “increased oppression to the point of no resistance”.

One may suspect that Carney used the word, “stability” as a synonym for social cohesion.

 

Short segment of The Gulag Archipelago: The nature of crime in a communist polity

Solzhenitsyn’s book is maybe one of the most important documents in political history.

People tend to write about the unusual, and ignore the normal, no matter how recently the bizarre became normalized.

As a result, we don’t have as many records of things from the past that reflect the day to day reality.

Just for an example, as a bird photographer among a group of bird photographers, we really don’t have many, if any, pictures of pigeons, starlings, crows or the myriad of little brown birds all over the place, but tend to focus on the rare, bizarre, magnificent or beautiful ones that take effort to find and get a decent photo of.

The Gulag Archipelago is the day to day machinations of a communist society. It is an amazingly powerful read if you are looking for the signs of growing totalitarianism in order to properly estimate your personal, or collective cost-benefit to fighting back against a state, increasingly divorcing itself from the interests of the people in general. More accurately, a power structure that increasingly oppresses the public, rather than solves problems or is an administrator of basis systems for them.

Like reading 1984 today, these books suddenly make sense as our personal experience begins to overlap with the frame of reference of the authors of the books. And no, this isn’t a good thing in terms of what is happening to us. Not having to read a map is good. But having one when you are lost is also good. And that is what these books are.

In this segment, there is a string of descriptions of arbitrary arrests and the reasons given for them. It is a very small sample of the ones in Alexander’s book, which is a very very small sample of the ones that actually took place. But I chose to truncate this file because the last one seems eerily like a string of recent arrests in the UK.

I’ll leave it up to the reader to decide what relationship, if any, these two cases have with each other. Not to mention the other 30 odd arrests every day in the UK for thought crimes. Many of which are posted here, and many more are on X.

 

 

 

Mark Carney and the New Soviet style block of Canada and the EU

A couple of things about Mark Carney, now that the Soviet past of Kier Starmer has been exposed by the Daily Mail. (See our post from a few days ago)

A little note here before we get going on this list of prima facia evidences that a communist takeover of Western nations has taken place. A couple of the reasons people do not believe it, or cannot take it seriously, is that A. They do not know what communism is, and when their associates, friends and even relatives who escaped from behind the Iron Curtain try and tell them why they risked life and limb, left their families and friends and careers/jobs to risk it all in a free country, they are looked on as eccentric foreigners who don’t know anything about their countries of origins. I know. I remember thinking that way about a Christian Lebanese man who ran a diner back in the 70s and had a complete meltdown at me in his restaurant when I gave him some relativist garbage about Islam and Lebanon. Guess who was right there? HINT: It wasn’t the sanctimonious Canadian kid.
B. Because people cannot comprehend that subversion and infiltration could happen at the highest levels. For them I would recommend reading Diana West’s books, The Red Thread and American Betrayal.

And if that doesn’t do it, and it won’t because no one will actually read those books unless they are already receptive to the idea that the US has in fact been heavily penetrated by the COMINTERN already, then get the book by an ex Soviet ‘influencer’ at a very high level who had an actual epiphany and became a Patriot and a Christian, The Whitaker Chambers book called Witness. This reads like a spy novel as Whitaker was actually an excellent writer of propaganda for the Soviets, so when he decided to tell the truth about his life and subversive activities, he made it a very interesting and easy read.

And if you can’t get people to try any of those, this is a free audio book on YouTube called. School of Darkness, by soviet agent, Bella Dodd about the work she did to destroy the US by having pedophiles and homosexuals join the Catholic Church as clergy and creating teacher’s unions for the sole purpose of transforming schools into Communist indoctrination centres. She also repeatedly mentions the effort the COMINTERN put, into electing a Democrat President FOUR TIMES IN A ROW. This is a worthy book. For those that know how, download it to your phones or load it on your phones and listen while doing errands or walking the dog or what have you. This is communist subversion as it actually happened 101. Unlike Yuri Bezmenov and for that matter, George Orwell who tried to tell us how it will happen and what it will be like when it does respectively.

Lastly, in the UK during the Cold War, the head, the top guy, of one of the most mission critical British intelligence agencies, Sir Roger Hollis, Director-General of MI5 (1956–1965) was a Soviet mole. He taunted the Brits by having a photo in his office of the Ural Mountains taken from the wrong side. And although that was never proven, all the accusations fit like a glove. But Kim Philby, of MI6 (SIS) Head of the Anti-Soviet section actually was 100% PROVEN to be a Soviet mole.

  • A fully recruited KGB agent from the 1930s

  • A member of the Cambridge Five spy ring

  • The head of MI6’s anti-Soviet division, while secretly working for the Soviets

  • Personally responsible for the deaths of Western agents after he exposed them

  • Officially confirmed by the Soviet government after his defection

  • Awarded the Order of Lenin in Moscow

  • Buried with full KGB honours

He admitted his espionage publicly in 1967.

Now back to Mark Carney:

“Liberals” have snuck in a Digital ID app out of nowhere

As a partial aside, Moose mentions the Century Initiative and connects Mark Carney to it, but missed this, when Carney was a guest speaker at least year’s meeting.

The EU is a communist entity, like the UN. And suddenly Carney’s antipathy to the US makes perfect sense. He clearly WANTED to have a reason to disengage with the US specifically in order to become part of the new COMINTERN entity, the EU and UN. The US is resisting that for the moment. Watch the video above. Although this is not so much about Carney making money. This is about destroying your most fundamental liberties, even in your own head.

From 1984:

The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression
for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc,
but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that
when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten,
a heretical thought–that is, a thought diverging from the principles of
Ingsoc–should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is
dependent on words. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and
often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could
properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the
possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly
by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable
words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and
so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever. To give a single
example. The word FREE still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be
used in such statements as ‘This dog is free from lice’ or ‘This field is
free from weeds’. It could not be used in its old sense of ‘politically
free’ or ‘intellectually free’ since political and intellectual freedom no
longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless.
Quite apart from the suppression of definitely heretical words, reduction
of vocabulary was regarded as an end in itself, and no word that could be
dispensed with was allowed to survive. Newspeak was designed not to extend
but to DIMINISH the range of thought, and this purpose was indirectly
assisted by cutting the choice of words down to a minimum.

We see this already in action. Talk to anyone who believes in a state narrative such as CO2 produced by human industry is destroying the climate, or conversely talk to anyone who buys into the various narratives that the mRNA injections were an untested experimental gene therapy or that there are no mass graves at residential schools etc. etc. ad nauseam. You will see how within their own heads they already cannot process information that is in opposition to narrative beliefs, even if you show them proof from climatologists or Pfizer itself, or the staggering lack of proof of residential graves and the total unwillingness to actually try to find any.

Now I have NOT Fact checked this following video. It intuitively tracks, and most likely enough of it is factual for its purpose, whatever it is. But it is worth watching. And if ANYONE knows for a fact that any of the claims in this video are true, or not true, or true with a qualifier PLEASE leave your observations in the comments. Some of this is easy public record though, so well worth posting. The thesis of this post of course is that Carney is a central component of the Western COMINTERN effort to take down individualist society, as he pretty much says in his own book albeit not directly. Instead he says Capitalism is the problem with the West and that Marx, Engles and Lenin are his inspiration. So this video belongs here.

From the National Post article linked above:

 

Helen Grus speaks at first public event since charges 3 years ago

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first event that Ottawa Police Detective Helen Grus has spoken at herself about the charges she faced within the police department for daring to investigate the mRNA injections as a possible cause of a dramatic uptick in infant baby deaths.

The synopsis of these videos can be read at RAIR Foundation, and a solid background can also be read at RAIR in this series of articles.

But these videos tell the story brilliantly.

Former Ottawa Policeman, Rob Stocki gives an excellent background of the situation, as well as an analysis of the state of policing.

Helen Grus herself for the first time in Public.

And retired Toronto Police Detective, Donald Best who has followed this story from the very beginning sent in a short but punchy video on the change of the entire philosophy of policing in Canada now.

A good video on what digital ID is, and how it already being used for tyranny in multiple countries

Please watch every word of this. I will likely go through it once or twice more to try and extrapolate to what this system of digital ID is meant to do. One suspects that it will make cash pointless as well. A store will have all their inventory tracked all the time. Everyone they sell to will be logged. The state will know everything everyone bought. Selling to someone for cash will be a crime, and cash could quite easily itself become a crime to use.Or if you have to show digital ID to use cash if it isn’t then what is the point of using cash? I dunno I need to watch this and think on it some more.

And good luck organizing a counter narrative protest of any kind in the future. Any protests that do take place, will likely be state sponsored. As nearly all of them are now.

The most chilling moment from our perspective was when he said that in Georgia, (I believe he said) they used it to freeze bank accounts and other services of lawyers who represented clients that are accused of acting counter to state interests. So the right of a defence, poof. Gone.

Ezra Levant goes to the Ostrich farm

So I still have no clue what this is about. The ONLY thing I think is the case, is that the state is behaving as usual, in a tyrannical fashion, where any science or medical facts have nothing to do with it, and narrative enforcement and arbitrary state authority have everything to do with it. This is par for Canada for some time now.

Ezra Levant does a ‘just the facts ma’am’ style report for which we are grateful.

UPDATE:

Ok I think I know where to land on this after watching the video above and giving it some thought.

First, we posted a video demonstrating the position of the state apparently. It had an ex UK police officer. You can know which one it is by the accent and bluntly authoritative tone he used.

Everything he said was frankly, bullshit.

There is zero mention of Covid, spike proteins or any of the other nonsense he spouted. No one is making any claims about that.

On the side of the protestors, there is a lot of arguments. But frankly I found it all exhausting because these are all, to borrow a phrase from SC, “Blue Pill Players”, And what I mean by that is they were arguing as if the issue was the issue and the facts matter.

Here is what makes sense to me.

IF the state, in this case represented by a Canadian food bureaucracy, and any number of highly paid state thugs, had any case at all to do what they did, they would have taken this issue to court. There would be a public hearing and if the farmers were found to be in the wrong based on real legal reasons, there would be warrants issued and we would see what is taking place. Now maybe that did happen and I am unaware. But no one has mentioned anything like that at all.

What I do know then, is Canadians have zero private property rights. At any time state thugs under the thinnest of auspices can storm your property, set up weapons systems, DISABLE YOUR ABILITY TO MONITOR YOUR OWN PROPERTY and carry on destroying your livestock or take whatever they want.

The two basic rules stand then.

With the left, the point is never the point. The revolution is always the point

When you see people arguing based on science, facts and reason they are likely fully missing the point. Like the vaccines. The ONLY issue was, “You do NOT have the RIGHT to make me take this stuff, even if it will save the entire human race”. Everything else was a distraction. I’m using the word, distraction in order not to say “bullshit” twice in any one post.

So there you have it. Like everything else, the Ostrich thing, as detailed by Ezra in the video above since every possible reason was given for the state not to take this action, but they are anyway, likely means this is about changing law so that what was ultra-vires, is now just a signature by a bureaucrat to destroy anything and everything for anyone, either because they are an obstacle to the revolution, or arbitrarily.

 

Canada’s top constitutional law firm has a serious warning for Canada about currently debated authoritarian legislation

The following video is an interview for RAIR Foundation with the founder and senior person at The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms in Canada, John Carpay.

This law firm has a very special modus operandi.

They only take clients where the case represents a serious concern to the constitutional and individual rights of all Canadians.

They take these cases pro-bono, depending on donors to fund their efforts. This is very important. This goes to motive for the defence as well as motive for choosing the cases. The JCCF has defended many people in the Freedom Convoy, and has taken on some of the more egregious cases in the wake of the dialectically named, “Canadian Human Rights Councils” if memory serves.

In this video Carpay covers many impending bills that the Carney regime is putting through as laws that will absolutely gut the very concept of individualism, let alone individual rights. Carney also indicated he may resurrect various Trudeau era bills that will do the same.

The synopsis of this interview can be seen at RAIR. 

I hope any Canadian or British person who reads this site will watch this interview and spread it around. Frankly, Canadians really need to understand this material. And John Carpay delivers the facts with a calm, rational manner that makes this even more chilling than the kind of hysterical hyperbole we see around these issues by counter-narrative media As that has become the new normal, the constant hysteria has also become less effective.

 

Digital ID in Canada: Without fact checking this video, it is consistent with all the other legislation being passed by Parliament since Trudeau/Carney took over.

Please watch this whole video.

No matter how accurate the analysis of the presenter s, we do see a brilliant and diamond clear example of the classic interpretation of problem, reaction solution. The state brings in millions of hostile illegals to the UK and funds them (as they do in Canada) and then claims the nation needs a digital ID because they have to cope with the problem of illegals working. This is ludicrous at so many levels it qualifies as Kafkaesque. The illegals likely don’t have to work as they get rather nice hotels and better meals than they did at home. Digital ID will likely not stop them from doing anything the state claims they don’t want them to do. Digital ID will give the state unprecedented control over the indigenous population of GB and likely the illegals will not be required to get digital ID in much the same way they were not required to take the mRNA injections in Canada and the USA.

More on Bill C8

One prediction:

During Covid, we saw the Canadian government destroy (temporarily at first) the most fundamental component of a republic or ‘democracy’. And that was the right of exit. The right to leave the country if you wanted to, for whatever reason. They used Covid to stop you from leaving Canada at one point.

You can bet the last coin you have in your pocket that once this is implemented, you will not be able to pack up and go somewhere less fascistic/communist. Canada will become a prison.

Those of you in a position to get a secure bolt hole in some other country where the threat of totalitarianism is less imminent may be well advised to do so now.

On censorship, ‘fascism’ and media in North America

I could probably write steadily for an entire week on this subject, injecting videos and news items to prove the thesis.

But there are other things to do which matter as well, and taking place all over, which need attention. Helen Grus is speaking shortly for the first time and allowing it to be filmed and published. This should be very interesting.

But I would like to start by making sense of all the items I plan to post with a simple metric which is consistent across multiple subjects, and eliminates the constant bickering about “hypocrisy” which our side uses, constantly, but which in fact is simply not the case.

This is targeted use of language for an effect. With the left, the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point.

Clever, right? So what does it mean.

When the left argues for a regulation, law or change in the culture, the reasons they give are never the reasons for which they want the law. The real reason is always destruction of Western thought down to the roots.

Examples are too easy and its basically all this site is about.

But to pick a few examples anyway:

Abortion as a women’s rights issue is about the negation of the concept of the sanctity of life. It then moved on to state controlled euthanasia, which is now the leading cause of death in Canada.

Vaccine mandates was to negate the idea that your body is your own or that you get to make any medical choices in your interests. Only the collective counts, and doubly so when it makes no sense at all. Like how an unvaccinated person could POSSIBLY be a threat to someone who has actually taken multiple injections of a safe and effective vaccine.

If there is irony there, it is that it turned out to be partially true. People who had the shots get much sicker from Covid than the people who did not take it, and are more likely to get it.

The state has the right to convince your own young children in schools that they are somehow born in the wrong body, and start a course of surgical mutilation that would make Mary Shelly blush with horror. The state then criminalized parents who tried to get their children to wait till they were old enough to get a beer or a tattoo before they got sterilized and turned into a simulacrum of the other sex. (Bill C-4)

They marketed this as “trans-affirming care” and used the critical theory attack of Trans-phobe if you oppose this. Also of course, the laser-painting terms of Fascist and Nazi, which they used to laser paint Charlie Kirk and get him assassinated. But not just him. Several attempts on President Trump as well of course and many others. Tim Fortune, Theo Van Gogh, nearly everyone who worked at Charlie Hebdo etc.

And now we move on to censorship.

A solid example of what looks like hypocrisy is floating around Twitter. How Canadian emery propaganda treats the firing of Jimmy Kimmel, vs. how the same media exactly treated the firing of a Canadian conservative icon, Don Cherry.

Cherry worked for the CBC

The CBC is a state agent.

Firing him for pointing out that migrants tended not to wear poppies on Remembrance Day, which was in essence a truism that the people our government is importing to replace us, have no connection to our culture, values, or share the honouring of our war dead, who actually did fight against real fascism, and authoritarianism of many kinds. He was correct. But Cherry violated a state narrative.

A private company firing a talk show host for what is tantamount to ‘flagrante delicto’ is a very, very common thing to do in the entertainment world, and is not censorship. If any artist brings his associated partners into disrepute, or exposes them to liability by their actions, firing them is normal and common. It is only censorship when the state itself seeks to silence you, and especially for a counter-narrative position.

What the Biden White House did to Alex Berenson was absolutely censorship. There is no definition where this would not be the case. Search Berenson’s Substack for his suit against the Biden White House for more on that.

Twitter also censored the two Indian scientists that wrote a paper proving that Covid was made in a lab in the very early days. You can read our article on that and download the paper here.

This was almost certainly also by the state. At the time, the narrative was that the virus was from a wet market. Actual proof, which would lead back to various US agents was not to be permitted. Please feel free to download that paper and send to anyone who has the scientific acumen to understand it.

Judges are also using sentencing to destroy our rule of law and sense of justice. We see people in jail for much longer periods for saying something on social media which opposes a state narrative attack on our culture than, say, raping 2 girls under 9 years old.

This is from a year ago, and in the USA.

In this article about a swarming attack of a Jewish couple in Venice Italy, there is no reference to them being caught at all. But they used a broken bottle as a weapon.

Muslims in the West, calling for women to be stoned to death, for sexual misconduct. Again though, the real issue with that beyond the sheer barbarity, is the replacement of due process with allegations and mob actions in order to establish Islamic supremacy, irrespective of the facts. Which makes it exactly like communism. And again, this is not hypocrisy. This is the careful strategic shaping of all of our Western systems to take them apart and replace them with one where the people have so little rights that most simply cannot fathom what is being done to them.

The Islamic State, which media insists on calling ISIS in order to shift it from Islam to a cartoon from the 2010s called Archer, asks Muslims to attack Christian and Jewish gatherings in the UK.

And believe it or not, the whole point of this is leading up to the banning of ANTIFA as a terrorist Organization, which it clearly is. We’ll get to it.

And this also leads to a very unfortunate data point indicating that the Conservative Party of Canada is controlled opposition at best. Active participants in the revolution at worst, based on the voting record.

The Conservatives didn’t just do a unanimous vote for Bill. C-4 on the criminalization of parents who try and talk children out of being Frankensteined, they danced in the damn isles and even asked to skip the last reading of the bill and cut right to passing it as law.

Some years before Covid, a masked group of state funded, masked thugs, would go to any protest that requested that we preserve freedom of speech in the face of Trudeau’s M-103, an attempt to make Islamophobia if not illegal, punishable defacto by a proxy army such as ANTIFA and later, BLM.

I know, I was at a lot of them. I saw masked black clad thugs in Ottawa and Montreal, prior to Covid, when it was ILLEGAL TO WEAR A MASK at a political protest. I printed out the law and showed it to the police at one these events when middle aged housewives simply wanted to preserve the basic constitutional right to freedom of speech. The police of course, did absolutely nothing.

So a group formed to protect these people from ANTIFA thuggery and intimidation. They called themselves The Proud Boys. This was simply a group of regular Canadians that felt it wasn’t right that ANTIFA could thug and intimidate nice people who were requesting basic liberty.

What was the response?

Please note that this was UNANIMOUS. The Conservatives, just like with bill C-4, voted to a man jack of them to declare the one group willing to defend people from state thugs as a terrorist group. Yet ZERO mention of ANTIFA in the legislation whatsoever. Not that it would have made it right, but it would at least be a mitigating factor had they also banned ANTIFA. But Antifa IS a terrorist group and the Proud Boys are not. The closest analogue for them I can think of at the moment would be the Red Berets from the New York Subway system, who would defend passengers since New York at the time had abandoned citizens to crime. That was prior to Mayor Giuliani of course.

Also prior to Covid, a Danish film maker made two movies. One was on the death off Europe due to Islam and Islamic crime and terrorism. People made an attempt to show the film at the Ottawa Public Library but they cancelled it at the last minute. So the film maker decided to make another film about Canada

This is that film below. The film contained interviews with ANTIFA, if such it can be called, and interviews with the Proud Boys. After seeing that, it would be interesting to know how many people still think the Conservative Party has any intention or ability to stop the destruction of Canada. Building homes for illegals at state expense is not a solution for example. Not bringing in people who can’t afford to be here and have no skills is the solution.

Moving forward, Bill C-2 allows the state to open our physical mail without warrant or any kind of due process.

Here’s a fun one. In the trial of Helen Grus, mysteriously all the txt msgs between herself and her fellow officers ALL DISAPPEARED from ALL of the phones. Add to that the Tweet below and we can say with certainty that this is now policy and NOT corruption. This is a very, very important distinction. It is not corruption, nor is it hypocrisy.

Trump at least has Sadiq Khan’s number

Here is Sadiq Khan laser painting THREE MILLION British patriots as fascists, racists and Nazis. He effectively declared open season on the British indigenous people with this tirade of communist dialectical language.

If you think this is over the top hyperbole, have a look back at this site from a decade ago and let me know if we were exaggerating then.

The Muslim rape gangs, actually more accurately, the Islamic child-sex-slave gangs, more typically known as Harems in the UK and elsewhere is a massive phenomenon, and nothing has happened to slow it down. The media in the UK still call the little girls who are raped as prostitutes, and refer to their adult Muslim rapists as “her lovers”. This remains true to this day.

There is a legendary story from the Soviet Union about a mayor or something,. that needed to show a high ranking Communist Party member how many homes he had built. HIs name was Potemkin. He ended up making a series of fake villages, just fronts for homes and stores but nothing behind them like a set for Western movie and I dunno I think it was Lenin rode on through them.

Carney took it to the next level. He created a Potemkin village to fool Canadians.

I have about 100 more items for this post. But I think for the moment we will leave it at that. More to come.

 

Thank you all for checking out this site.