Category Archives: Ottawa

Yesterday in Ottawa, the streets filled with grateful Persians, expat Iranians much to the consternation of the handful of leftists protesting trump at the US embassy.

Posted on by

The story can be read at RAIR Foundation. The bones can be seen here though.

There are two groups of expat Iranians on the streets yesterday. The first was a small group I have seen at pretty much the same spot between Parliament and the bridge over the Canal on Rideau st. since the Covid era.

I got an interview with the organizer of that group yesterday on his views of the events of the day. As he and his group had been there for years, I really wanted to focus on how Canadian media had treated his views on Iran. He was very diplomatic in his answer. But it isn’t hard to tell what he really thinks about it.

(As with all the videos in this post, hit the gear and dial it up to the top quality for the best viewing experience)

There was however a MUCH larger group that assembled at the last minute. The first group in the video above is at the hill at least every Saturday if not more often. But hits group was assembled independently and at the very last minute, since they only made the calls when they heard about the attack.

The second group also differs in that they support the instalment of Reza Pahlavi as leader of Iran. He is the son of the late Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was overthrown in 1979 during the Islamic Revolution that brought Ruhollah Khomeini to power. The first group feels he is probably just as bad as the Mullahs but in some other way. They want a more pure democracy.

But the majority seem to want Reza installed.

below is an interview with an organizer of yesterday’s protest:

Below are moments from the march from parliament Hill to the US Embassy in Ottawa. It was a great moment when hundreds of Persians, none of them exactly white by the leftist’s standards, marched past a rag tag few professional leftists while the Persians chanted slogans of devotion and appreciation to Donald Trump and Bibi Netanyahu.

Hearing them chant against the Islamic Republic was also refreshing. It is amazing what non-legacy Canadians and actual refugees can get away with on the streets compared to say, Canadians demanding their basic rights to bodily autonomy.

A couple of stills if anyone wants to share, help demonstrate the mood.

Curious propaganda mural near the CBC building on Sparks St. Mall in Ottawa

Posted on by

Narrative propaganda in Canada is increasing in frequency quite dramatically. From ‘Pride’ flags promoting the Trans and LGBTQ dialectic in every community centre and hung on the front wall of any Church that doesn’t want to find its building in flames. Or at least I suspect that’s how it works. Someone needs to do a study on the six hundred Churches that have been burned down in Canada and see how many of them refused to go along what we think of as the literal negation of Deuteronomy, by hanging a gay-trans etc. pride flag on their buildings. A Demonic or diabolical version of the Lamb’s Blood from Exodus. Classic communist thinking if this is indeed the case.

And at this point, the colour spectrum ROYGBIV has been pretty much hijacked as a symbol for celebrating homosexuality. Perhaps because it originally was a symbol of God’s Covenant with Man after the Flood. And Communism seems to have a curious obsession with negating the symbols of Judaism and Christianity for some reason. Maybe it’s all those poems Karl Marx write to Satan.  Itself a curious thing to do really. Indifference to alternative sexuality so long as it’s among consensual adults seems like the truly liberal thing to do. But of course, Leftist use of sexual identity is after all, like multiculturalism, a dialectic attack on purposeful sexuality. Sex that leads to relationships that cause and raise the next generation of people. Any outlet for the sexual impulse that avoids reproduction appears to be what the left doesn’t just celebrate, but will criminalize you for not celebrating. Thinking again of the Canadian veteran woman who was debanked just for asking her branch manager if instead of having 5 Gay Pride flags in front of that branch, maybe they could have 4 and one Canadian flag. That was enough to have all her services cancelled.

All this was inspired by a curious mural which is on Sparks St. a block from the CBC HQ and a block from Parliament Hill. It features all the iconic animals of Canada. Except they have been represented as having rainbow fur and feathers. Which reminds us of a classic Alex Jones video.

There was a viral clip of Alex Jones yelling about “They’re turning the freeaking frogs gay”. Of course this was in response to an RFK Jr. talk on how atrazine in fact does exactly that, or morph them into females etc.

But it kinda looks like whoever authorized this mural on Sparks St. is if not turning all Canadian wildlife gay, at least misrepresenting them that way.

Gay animals means extinct in one generation. So generally, no. That doesn’t happen. Animals that are gay end in one generation. Like Humans.

And just in case you think we are kidding about the use of homosexuality and other forms of sex as a dialectic weapon intended to negate all aspects of culture and for that matter, reality itself. check out the hit new play on pan-sexual Anne Frank.

Quoting the article [Bold is mine]:

A show has turned the tragedy of Anne Frank into an ‘inclusive’ commentary on wokeness. And New York City audiences can’t get enough.

I recently saw the most brilliant new musical in New York City. It’s not on Broadway. It’s not even in a traditional theatre.

It’s at a bar and performance space called AsylumNYC. And it lives up to the name of its venue.

Slam Frank, whose developmental run opened on September 17 and closes on October 26, is a reimagining of the story of Anne Frank that asks: What if her diary were inclusive? What if we addressed the lack of queer representation in that attic? What if we finally told the story of the Holocaust in a way that honours all people, not just the white people it has always centred on?

And now the left has found a way to dissolve the Holocaust and the story of near genocide of the World’s Jewish population using the alt.sex narrative attacks, I really hope it’s starting to come into focus. This isn’t a function of tolerance of the differently sexual. This is using any form of sexuality that can be imagined as a weapon against normalcy.

Curious road closures and emergency event at Parliament Hill

Posted on by

Chris Dacey headed down to the Hill after the Tamra Lich talk today which she gave after her guilty verdict was rendered in the courts from the longest running Mischief trial in the history of the Common wealth. That talk and Q&A should be available to all soon. But right after the talk, Chris Dacey caught this action at Parliament Hill. The newest rumour is that the bomb squad is there. But this has no actual meaning even if true most likely. Kinda like how when they get a 911 call they sometimes send fire, police and ambulance even though only one or none is needed.

CTV ‘News’

Lockdown continues at Parliament Hill East Block after man barricades himself, police say

No description of suspect or name given. So… yeah.

If anything else comes up we’ll update this post.

 

 

Grandmother at Freedom Convoy anniversary explains why she is there: Protesting the Sexualization of primary school children

Posted on by

For the story details, please see RAIR Foundation.

Yesterday was the second anniversary of the attack on the peaceful, actually joyous would be the more accurate word, protestors against Trudeau’s full on attack against Canadian citizens and their rights. From bodily autonomy as established by among other laws, the Nuremberg Code which Canada signed on to in 1950 as law, to the right of exit and return, the fundamental freedoms of Canadians are being attacked by the Trudeau viceroy govt. for the COMINTERN and the Convoy was a miraculous effort by everyday Canadians to try and demand those rights be restored.

On February the 17th, 2022 we all know what happened. And yesterday on the Hill, around 2000 people at peak attended the anniversary. The spirit was good on the Hill. Several speakers and a lot of music acts were available.

One woman was holding a sign with the FBI published symbol for pedophile organizations next to one for the Trudeau Foundation. So we asked her why she was there.

(As usual, if you want to be able to make out the details of the people, flags and insignias in the background, please click the little gear, bottom right of the play window, and select quality and go to the highest one available.)

Saturday’s Mega-march for global communism bearded by Hamas in Ottawa

Posted on by

Please do watch this video and read the short article at RAIR Foundation for the plot twist on this one. Just in case you thought these demonstrations where about Israel and the victim narrative of Palestinians.

Pro-Israel gathering at City Hall, Ottawa on Sunday as a counter to the massive Hamas supporters’ demonstrations in Canada and around the Western world

Posted on by

Please read the story at RAIR Foundation.

In point form, supporters of Israel gathered at City Hall in Ottawa at 3:00, which appeared to be timed to be after pro-Hamas demonstrations in the same general area. At about 3:30, the group marched up Elgin St. to Parliament Hill where speeches where given, one by a Federal MP who had been one of the loudest voices pushing for M-103, the bill that was to give special status to Islam in Canada and protect it from criticism.

The organizer of the protest declined to do an interview with RAIR although she did give one to CBC, The Citizen, and Le Droit. I hope they treated her fairly.

The initial gathering with some Hamas supporters passing by on their way to the parking garage.

[As always, please click the little gear on the bottom right and select the highest quality for the best experience watching these videos.]

The March up Laurier and Elgin to Parliament Hill:

Speeches and crowd on Parliament Hill

Letter from OCDSB [Ottawa School Board] to families with kids in the system on the anti-SOGI march September 20th

Posted on by

I will post the body of the email here short of the addressee information.

It would be great if readers of this site would read it carefully and think about what the implications, both overt and more subtle actually are for this email. To what extent is this political? How much does it have to do with educating children? Is the school impartial on the issues? Think of other aspects of this email that need parsing and add your thoughts in the comments.

———

From: OCDSB Communications [mailto:di**********@***sb.ca” data-original-string=”QEMQ/8UqLUL0U/ZsleqKdw==03cSJTGeykpiIujlRfNGL7IDjQCfaAJEp4siLYEkchEZ54fOWN2MoX2YusV30OhrqNI47B95O/DmPAU4KmUwnDrqg==” title=”This contact has been encoded by Anti-Spam by CleanTalk. Click to decode. To finish the decoding make sure that JavaScript is enabled in your browser.]

Sent: September 22, 2023 3:34 PM
To:
Subject: Parent/Caregiver Update: September 22, 2023

Dear OCDSB Families,

Earlier this week, rallies were held across the country and on Parliament Hill “against how schools teach gender ideology”. This has become very divisive and commonly pits claims for parental rights, protection of children, and indoctrination against claims of hate, transphobia, and safety. These demonstrations foster a culture of hate and fear.

What is unfortunate is that the demonstrations and counter demonstrations do not lead to conversation. They do not generate critical thinking, dialogue, or discussion. There is no learning from each other, there is little respect, acceptance or empathy. 

Schools are places of learning. We have a responsibility to provide an education to all students in a safe, caring, and welcoming environment. We stand unequivocally with the 2SLGBTQ+ community who we know are facing rising discrimination and violence. Please read our statement.

The rest is on unrelated matters. Do comment. Another aspect could be, does this email conform to Marcuse’s “Liberating Tolerance” dialectic?

Here is a link to quite an excellent Tweet. While his analogy is far from perfect for a few reasons, it is still an excellent example of the problems with the normal reasoning as applied by the letter above. Also read the thread below. Its quite clear.

Rolling Thunder Ottawa V2.0

Posted on by

Once again, Vets 4 Freedom took a shot at riding around the war memorial, originally to reconsecrate it after how it was disgraced by the Ottawa government during the Freedom Convoy. Please read the story details at RAIR

A short time later, a micro convoy on Wellington St.

 

The fundamentally communist reasoning of Ottawa’s energy plans

Posted on by

The clip below is from the City of Ottawa meeting of April 18th, 2023 where the city took questions on the radical plans to transform the energy grid, and life in Ottawa overall.

The first question asked to Angela Keller-Herzog was about the seeming reluctance of the city to consider what Hydro Ottawa had to say in response to the plan to make Ottawa run on solar and wind.

Herzog’s answer was straight out of one of the early anecdotes from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s. famous book on the workings of the Soviet Union, The Gulag Archipelago.

The example he gives, illustrating the reversal of reality dictating policy, a central axiom of communism, was when the Soviet told the rail engineers that they had to double the amount each train carried on each trip. It was explained to the political officers that the tracks could only handle so much weight and to double the load would lead to catastrophes. The Soviets rounded up those engineers who refused to double the load and shot them. Then doubled the weight of the trains. Catastrophe followed resulting in hundreds of deaths and massive damage. The people who orchestrated that were given the Order of Lenin. (It may have been another honour, it has been a few years since I read book 1)

Listen to Keller-Herzog’s answer about the city not listening to Ottawa Hydro and see if there is a comparison there. The master plan must be supported. The reality of how much you can make by wind and solar is not to be discussed.

The next speaker is using reason to defeat the plan overall, but at the top layer of deception of the plan itself. This means that his objection, while scientifically accurate and verifiable and therefore, ‘true’ still operates on the base assumption that man made CO2 is causing climate change, or more precisely, Global Warming. I would go out on a limb and suggest that he knows the CO2-Global warming connection is utter nonsense, but realizes that our civilization is too far gone into the abyss of scientism to attack the base lie. It has been accepted as axiomatic, both by repetition and by extensive use of Discourse Theory. Still, worth watching as he attacks the plan on the basis of ‘even if true then…’.

The next presenter explains why we have to eat crap we don’t want. The excuse is the Carbon Footprint of food. Which again, is a branch of the base lie, that CO2 causes the world to heat up in a way that is somehow a bad thing. There is no science or reason to the presentation. Just a plan on how to make life less pleasant in order to reduce carbon in agriculture. Something one might suspect is related to this National Post article on Trudeau’s advisor, Mark Carney. Especially the part where he says his plan is to make our lives worse, not better. The presentation on making more plant based options, really means taking away your choice of what you want to eat. Note that prisons are on her list of where food will change.

How Ottawa plans to change your life slide 1

Next is Nigel Ellis. His volume was very low on the video. I had to raise it to the level of the other speakers to be heard. He also played into the CO2 = Global Warming myth, but at least used science to show why the plans to reduce it are nonsense even if we accept the hypothesis as it is.

Karen Bourdeau asks some proper questions, like “When do you plan to ask the residents of Ottawa about your plan to “prohibit automotive oriented land use”. It should not be a rhetorical question because it is a policy that will destroy many generations of labour and development, and end much freedom and liberty. But we all know it is rhetorical. The Politburo doesn’t ask the public what it wants. It appoints experts to speak for the people, that give the answers the politburo wants. She also asks questions that appear to be related to a covert plan to implement 15 minute city type restrictions in Ottawa.

Next is an Ottawa U prof. His volume was very good. Loud even. So I bet you can guess what his politics are. He launches into full scale and undisguised Habermas Discourse Theory attacks against people who merely asked rational questions about the plan to radically transform Ottawa due to alleged CO2 effects on global climate. He expresses outward dismay that they were even allowed to speak and called them “essentially climate deniers”. This is a Frankfurt School dialectic where you destroy the people who disagree with your consensus view you are trying to impose on the majority. Call them names that effectively makes them thought criminals. For a refresher on the formal method of how this works, click through to this video on Marcuse and Habermas and making truth, hate speech.

It is also famously Saul Alinsky Rules for Radical rule XIII if memory serves.

This Prof. also wants a shift from voluntary to mandatory measures. Somehow, indigenous leadership and rights factor in to changing the climate.

Next is Danielle, who tries to steer the ship back towards safe shores by mentioning that even far left wing extremist, Michael Moore made a film exposing the green scam of wind and solar. She is followed by another climate scare advocate who demands more action to lower CO2.

After the delegations is questions to staff. Here’s one that doesn’t get asked. Why is Canada, which seems to be the most vocal nation in terms of pushing the Global Warming scare, actively working on their Century Initiative plan to increase Canada’s population to 100,000,000 people via immigration from hot countries, where their per-capita carbon footprint goes up by FOUR TIMES!

This ‘debate’ was not about competing visions for a better Ottawa or world. This was a confrontation of individual rights Vs. collective authoritarianism. Authoritarianism using any excuse it can make up to justify its actions. If Covid measures didn’t convince anyone that this is the plan, then don’t be surprised with what these people do to us in the name of ‘climate change’.

For a really comprehensive and science based, fact based analysis on the Climate Scare of Global Warming, please watch this video below and maybe take some notes in case you run into a believer.

Veteran Ontario doctor loses licence for failure to comply with ‘corporate medicine’

Posted on by

This is an excellent example of how formerly benign and perhaps even beneficial institutions such as the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons, have become weaponized and are now instruments of political control. Gone is the quaint notion of “go and get a second opinion”, now replaced with Stasi like operatives acting as patients to spy on doctors to make sure they are enforcing the political lines on disease treatment. No personal expertise or judgement allowed.

Until Covid, or let us say in 1 BC, medicine was practiced by doctors using their best judgement to determine what disease a patient suffered from, then find the best way to treat it with the least danger associated with the treatment. Patients were often encouraged to seek a second opinion.

Now medicine across the Western world has become what is often referred to as, “Corporate Medicine” where a higher authority, like the government, determines all courses of action for all aspects of medical health. The Soviet Union also did medicine this way. Talk to anyone from behind the Iron Curtain to find out how this worked out. Like in Canada today, everyone had to learn a sort of ‘secret language’ to communicate with each other. To hide the truth within the official lie.

Please watch this video carefully. Some of the most horrifying aspects of what happened to this veteran Ottawa doctor are understated. But the reality is what it is, and must be understood for what it is.