Category Archives: Ontario

Grandmother at Freedom Convoy anniversary explains why she is there: Protesting the Sexualization of primary school children

Posted on by

For the story details, please see RAIR Foundation.

Yesterday was the second anniversary of the attack on the peaceful, actually joyous would be the more accurate word, protestors against Trudeau’s full on attack against Canadian citizens and their rights. From bodily autonomy as established by among other laws, the Nuremberg Code which Canada signed on to in 1950 as law, to the right of exit and return, the fundamental freedoms of Canadians are being attacked by the Trudeau viceroy govt. for the COMINTERN and the Convoy was a miraculous effort by everyday Canadians to try and demand those rights be restored.

On February the 17th, 2022 we all know what happened. And yesterday on the Hill, around 2000 people at peak attended the anniversary. The spirit was good on the Hill. Several speakers and a lot of music acts were available.

One woman was holding a sign with the FBI published symbol for pedophile organizations next to one for the Trudeau Foundation. So we asked her why she was there.

(As usual, if you want to be able to make out the details of the people, flags and insignias in the background, please click the little gear, bottom right of the play window, and select quality and go to the highest one available.)

Saturday’s Mega-march for global communism bearded by Hamas in Ottawa

Posted on by

Please do watch this video and read the short article at RAIR Foundation for the plot twist on this one. Just in case you thought these demonstrations where about Israel and the victim narrative of Palestinians.

Toronto Jewish School evacuated due to specifically antisemitic bomb threat

Posted on by

This is breaking.

Click through for the thread and the latest

The actual threat:

Pro-Israel gathering at City Hall, Ottawa on Sunday as a counter to the massive Hamas supporters’ demonstrations in Canada and around the Western world

Posted on by

Please read the story at RAIR Foundation.

In point form, supporters of Israel gathered at City Hall in Ottawa at 3:00, which appeared to be timed to be after pro-Hamas demonstrations in the same general area. At about 3:30, the group marched up Elgin St. to Parliament Hill where speeches where given, one by a Federal MP who had been one of the loudest voices pushing for M-103, the bill that was to give special status to Islam in Canada and protect it from criticism.

The organizer of the protest declined to do an interview with RAIR although she did give one to CBC, The Citizen, and Le Droit. I hope they treated her fairly.

The initial gathering with some Hamas supporters passing by on their way to the parking garage.

[As always, please click the little gear on the bottom right and select the highest quality for the best experience watching these videos.]

The March up Laurier and Elgin to Parliament Hill:

Speeches and crowd on Parliament Hill

Letter from OCDSB [Ottawa School Board] to families with kids in the system on the anti-SOGI march September 20th

Posted on by

I will post the body of the email here short of the addressee information.

It would be great if readers of this site would read it carefully and think about what the implications, both overt and more subtle actually are for this email. To what extent is this political? How much does it have to do with educating children? Is the school impartial on the issues? Think of other aspects of this email that need parsing and add your thoughts in the comments.

———

From: OCDSB Communications [mailto:di**********@oc***.ca" data-original-string="AgtTcgDFZfpGGwBuUWHaG8DKhGjAMUy/P2qhmPsakxA=" title="This contact has been encoded by Anti-Spam by CleanTalk. Click to decode. To finish the decoding make sure that JavaScript is enabled in your browser.]

Sent: September 22, 2023 3:34 PM
To:
Subject: Parent/Caregiver Update: September 22, 2023

Dear OCDSB Families,

Earlier this week, rallies were held across the country and on Parliament Hill “against how schools teach gender ideology”. This has become very divisive and commonly pits claims for parental rights, protection of children, and indoctrination against claims of hate, transphobia, and safety. These demonstrations foster a culture of hate and fear.

What is unfortunate is that the demonstrations and counter demonstrations do not lead to conversation. They do not generate critical thinking, dialogue, or discussion. There is no learning from each other, there is little respect, acceptance or empathy. 

Schools are places of learning. We have a responsibility to provide an education to all students in a safe, caring, and welcoming environment. We stand unequivocally with the 2SLGBTQ+ community who we know are facing rising discrimination and violence. Please read our statement.

The rest is on unrelated matters. Do comment. Another aspect could be, does this email conform to Marcuse’s “Liberating Tolerance” dialectic?

Here is a link to quite an excellent Tweet. While his analogy is far from perfect for a few reasons, it is still an excellent example of the problems with the normal reasoning as applied by the letter above. Also read the thread below. Its quite clear.

Rolling Thunder Ottawa V2.0

Posted on by

Once again, Vets 4 Freedom took a shot at riding around the war memorial, originally to reconsecrate it after how it was disgraced by the Ottawa government during the Freedom Convoy. Please read the story details at RAIR

A short time later, a micro convoy on Wellington St.

 

Interview with another brave freedom fighter who WON against the government over mandates

Posted on by

Kelly Hale still has a way to go to get even a fraction of what the neo-fascist governments of Canada did to him and his business using Covid as an excuse. But at least he got his first win in the courts.

Please read the details at RAIR Foundation. Video below:

 

The fundamentally communist reasoning of Ottawa’s energy plans

Posted on by

The clip below is from the City of Ottawa meeting of April 18th, 2023 where the city took questions on the radical plans to transform the energy grid, and life in Ottawa overall.

The first question asked to Angela Keller-Herzog was about the seeming reluctance of the city to consider what Hydro Ottawa had to say in response to the plan to make Ottawa run on solar and wind.

Herzog’s answer was straight out of one of the early anecdotes from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s. famous book on the workings of the Soviet Union, The Gulag Archipelago.

The example he gives, illustrating the reversal of reality dictating policy, a central axiom of communism, was when the Soviet told the rail engineers that they had to double the amount each train carried on each trip. It was explained to the political officers that the tracks could only handle so much weight and to double the load would lead to catastrophes. The Soviets rounded up those engineers who refused to double the load and shot them. Then doubled the weight of the trains. Catastrophe followed resulting in hundreds of deaths and massive damage. The people who orchestrated that were given the Order of Lenin. (It may have been another honour, it has been a few years since I read book 1)

Listen to Keller-Herzog’s answer about the city not listening to Ottawa Hydro and see if there is a comparison there. The master plan must be supported. The reality of how much you can make by wind and solar is not to be discussed.

The next speaker is using reason to defeat the plan overall, but at the top layer of deception of the plan itself. This means that his objection, while scientifically accurate and verifiable and therefore, ‘true’ still operates on the base assumption that man made CO2 is causing climate change, or more precisely, Global Warming. I would go out on a limb and suggest that he knows the CO2-Global warming connection is utter nonsense, but realizes that our civilization is too far gone into the abyss of scientism to attack the base lie. It has been accepted as axiomatic, both by repetition and by extensive use of Discourse Theory. Still, worth watching as he attacks the plan on the basis of ‘even if true then…’.

The next presenter explains why we have to eat crap we don’t want. The excuse is the Carbon Footprint of food. Which again, is a branch of the base lie, that CO2 causes the world to heat up in a way that is somehow a bad thing. There is no science or reason to the presentation. Just a plan on how to make life less pleasant in order to reduce carbon in agriculture. Something one might suspect is related to this National Post article on Trudeau’s advisor, Mark Carney. Especially the part where he says his plan is to make our lives worse, not better. The presentation on making more plant based options, really means taking away your choice of what you want to eat. Note that prisons are on her list of where food will change.

How Ottawa plans to change your life slide 1

Next is Nigel Ellis. His volume was very low on the video. I had to raise it to the level of the other speakers to be heard. He also played into the CO2 = Global Warming myth, but at least used science to show why the plans to reduce it are nonsense even if we accept the hypothesis as it is.

Karen Bourdeau asks some proper questions, like “When do you plan to ask the residents of Ottawa about your plan to “prohibit automotive oriented land use”. It should not be a rhetorical question because it is a policy that will destroy many generations of labour and development, and end much freedom and liberty. But we all know it is rhetorical. The Politburo doesn’t ask the public what it wants. It appoints experts to speak for the people, that give the answers the politburo wants. She also asks questions that appear to be related to a covert plan to implement 15 minute city type restrictions in Ottawa.

Next is an Ottawa U prof. His volume was very good. Loud even. So I bet you can guess what his politics are. He launches into full scale and undisguised Habermas Discourse Theory attacks against people who merely asked rational questions about the plan to radically transform Ottawa due to alleged CO2 effects on global climate. He expresses outward dismay that they were even allowed to speak and called them “essentially climate deniers”. This is a Frankfurt School dialectic where you destroy the people who disagree with your consensus view you are trying to impose on the majority. Call them names that effectively makes them thought criminals. For a refresher on the formal method of how this works, click through to this video on Marcuse and Habermas and making truth, hate speech.

It is also famously Saul Alinsky Rules for Radical rule XIII if memory serves.

This Prof. also wants a shift from voluntary to mandatory measures. Somehow, indigenous leadership and rights factor in to changing the climate.

Next is Danielle, who tries to steer the ship back towards safe shores by mentioning that even far left wing extremist, Michael Moore made a film exposing the green scam of wind and solar. She is followed by another climate scare advocate who demands more action to lower CO2.

After the delegations is questions to staff. Here’s one that doesn’t get asked. Why is Canada, which seems to be the most vocal nation in terms of pushing the Global Warming scare, actively working on their Century Initiative plan to increase Canada’s population to 100,000,000 people via immigration from hot countries, where their per-capita carbon footprint goes up by FOUR TIMES!

This ‘debate’ was not about competing visions for a better Ottawa or world. This was a confrontation of individual rights Vs. collective authoritarianism. Authoritarianism using any excuse it can make up to justify its actions. If Covid measures didn’t convince anyone that this is the plan, then don’t be surprised with what these people do to us in the name of ‘climate change’.

For a really comprehensive and science based, fact based analysis on the Climate Scare of Global Warming, please watch this video below and maybe take some notes in case you run into a believer.

Canadian municipalities declare themselves 15 minute cities, small farmers will become Kulaks

Posted on by

Only fact checked one aspect of this so far, but so far it checks out.

@nikisfunnyfarm #greenscreen ? original sound – Niki’s Funny Farm

Ottawa, a 15 minute city

Introduced in the ‘Five Big Moves’, the principles of 15-minute neighbourhoods are integral to the strategic directions contained in Ottawa’s Draft New Official Plan. The concept of 15-minute neighbourhoods supports a variety of objectives relating to intensification, economic development, energy and climate change, gender equity, and culture. Additionally, planning for 15-minute neighbourhoods represents a critical means of embedding health resiliency in planning in order to achieve healthier, more inclusive communities.

15-minute neighbourhoods are compact, well-connected places with a clustering of a diverse mix of land-uses; this includes a range of housing types, shops, services, local access to food, schools and day care facilities, employment, greenspaces, parks and pathways. They are complete communities that support active transportation and transit, reduce car dependency, and enable people to live car-light or car free.

The 15-minute neighbourhood study is the first step at understanding the components of a 15-minute neighbourhood as they evolve across Ottawa’s urban, suburban, and rural transects. This study of 15-minute neighbourhoods is composed primarily of two different mapping exercises. One looking at access to available services and amenities; and the other focusing on the safety and enjoyability of the pedestrian environment with respect to walking to these services and amenities.

(Could be worse. Imagine if we weren’t vaccinated didn’t ‘win’ the last municipal election in Ottawa)

Here is a link to the local council with references to Green Space Alliance without saying much about what it is. Also lots of climate change bollux in it.

The following is from here:

It’s all still ruddy mysterious though. Can’t figure out what the “Green Space Alliance” changes to the land use laws will be yet.

The CPSO has investigated itself and found itself not guilty

Posted on by

A few months ago, some readers of this web site might remember that we posted a live broadcast of a lawyer representing three doctors against the now fully captured, “College of Surgeons and Physicians of Ontario”.

The college made a link to the Zoom available but got so overwhelmed with requests for it that they put it on YouTube with strict instructions that no one should record or republish it yada yada wuzza wuzza.

Hopefully someone outside Ontario has it and will post it for the world to see how the three doctors had a slam-dunk case against the college, yet now today, this judgement came in from them. 

In part:

THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE PHYSICIANS

[7]     Broadly speaking, the three physicians take issue with some of the public health measures relating to COVID-19 such as vaccination and treatment.

[8]     The allegations in the three Notices of Hearing can be summarized as follows.

[9]     The College alleges that Dr. Trozzi committed professional misconduct by making misleading, incorrect or inflammatory statements about vaccinations, treatments and public health measures concerning COVID-19 through his email and online communications about the pandemic.

[10]   In Dr. Phillips’ case, the allegations of professional misconduct include making misleading, incorrect or inflammatory statements about vaccinations, treatments and public health measures for COVID-19; disclosing information from a College investigation, including posting such information online and failing to remove it when requested; and failing to cooperate with College investigations. The College alleges that he failed to maintain the standard of practice of the profession and engaged in disgraceful, dishonourable and unprofessional conduct in different aspects of his treatment of patients and public health reporting, that he engaged in unprofessional conduct and communications at his hospital workplace and also breached terms, conditions and limitations on his certificate of registration.

[11]   The College alleges that Dr. Luchkiw committed professional misconduct by failing to cooperate with College investigations relating to her infection control practices, communications about COVID-19 and issuance of vaccine exemptions.

Then skipping forward a lot:

[36]   Justice Morgan stated:  

[1] The three Respondents in this set of Applications are physicians who believe that vaccinations are a misguided and ineffective way to address the ongoing health issues caused by COVID-19. Although the specifics of each of their cases differ somewhat, they are each under investigation by the Applicant for their conduct and practices in acting on this belief.

[2] None of the Respondents [is] prepared to cooperate in the usual way with the Applicant’s investigation. They are each of the view that the investigation and the disclosure and production requirements that accompany an investigation amount to an abuse of the regulator’s power…. 

[5] In the words of the formal Appointment of Investigator documentation, the inquiries were to examine each of the Respondents’ practices “including in relation to COVID-19 and [his or her] completion of medical exemptions for COVID-19 vaccinations and diagnostic testing”. For the Respondent, Patrick Brian Phillips, the Applicant had an additional concern regarding his use of online websites and social media to disseminate what the Applicant characterized as misleading health information about COVID-19, as well as his posting on social media, copies of what were supposed to be confidential communications from the Applicant. The Appointment of Investigator in respect of Dr. Phillips mandated the investigator to investigate his medical practice “including in relation to communications and conduct relating to the COVID-19 pandemic”.

…

[23] The record demonstrates through correspondence and other statements that the Respondents have no intent to provide the requested documents or to otherwise cooperate with the investigator. Their communications to the Applicant indicate that they are not prepared to respond to the matters that the investigator is investigating.

[29] The Respondents are all in continual breach of their obligations under the Code. They have put forward no reason for their refusal to comply with their obligations in this regard, except to reiterate their objection to vaccines. As indicated, what the investigator seeks is production of records; the investigation does not seek to compel vaccinations or any other specific medical treatment. Accordingly, the Respondents’ position is unresponsive to the investigator’s request and their argument about the efficacy or inefficacy of COVID vaccines is a non-sequitur.

Not being a lawyer or a doctor, or even having read this whole judgement, it sure looks on the surface that the deal is:

Doctors, who acted on their best medical judgement and attempted to dissuade people from taking an experimental and mostly untested new technology (possibly made by DoD as a military countermeasure and not actually developed by a drug company at all) are guilty of not doing what government and its agents, like the CPSO, tell them to do.

This means the official transformation of medicine from a science into a corporate practice where all practices are diktats from the top. Remember that old saying that we should all always get a second opinion? Doctors aren’t allowed to have opinions now. They have to follow instructions from government. And these doctors did not. And so they are guilty of something or other. Their patients who did not take the vaxx, are likely fine. We know now that they are less likely to catch Covid and certainly less likely to have a serious case and less likely to die of it than those who took lots of shots and certainly, infinitely less likely to suffer side effects and adverse reactions than those who took any number of shots.

So win-win for everyone who avoided the accursed Witches’ brew.

Meanwhile, back at the college: