Yesterday was to be the last day of these hearings over accusations of misconduct for an officer that dared do her job as it is described, and as it always was. Much like the CPSO hearings waged against doctors that put patient health over state diktats on mRNA injections and various other measures over the last few years, this officer has been made to stand down for actually investigating a cluster of 9 infant deaths and checking a possible mRNA vaxx link to the nursing mothers.
For the post on this from Monday with the basics on how we got to this point, please click here. If you are already familiar with this case, continue on.
Below is a new interview with retired Toronto PD detective, Donald Best, filmed Friday at the Lunch break after a morning of procedurally bizarre testimony and obsessive objections by both the prosecution, and even the officer playing the role of judge.
Additional information about one aspect of this hearing is as follows:
Prosecutor: Vanessa Stewart
Witness: Detective Constable Renee Stewart
Renee Stewart is married to Vanessa’s brother- making them sisters-in-law.
Believe it or not, this is far from the only conflicts of interest in this case.
Dr. Mary O’Connor was present at the hearings and I had the opportunity to ask her what she thought of it, given that she had undergone a similar quasi-legal set of hearings with very real consequences.
RAIR Foundation has the write up here.
Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson asked me to say a few words on her show last night about this trial and what I thought it meant. Anyone interested may wish to start at 54 minutes in to the video.
Bottom lining it: Doctors are now punished for practicing medicine in the best interests of the health of the patient, when it goes against state diktats and ideology. Police are now in the exact same position, that when they do an investigation which is 100% within their job description, and more importantly, is actually what the public expects police to do, they are also punished for the exact same reasons.
Excellent post Vlad especially the interview with Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson. This is different but it has the echoes of the Lucy Letby trial. In other words, protecting their own narrative.
Lucy Letby trial: Nurse ‘gaslighted colleagues to hide baby murders’
by Daniel O’Donoghue – June 19, 2023
Excerpt:
Conspiracy theory’
In her evidence, Ms Letby, originally of Hereford, told the jury a number of senior doctors – referred to as “the gang of four” by the prosecution – had apportioned “blame” on to her “to cover up failings at the hospital”.
Ms Letby named Dr Ravi Jayaram, Dr Stephen Brearey, Dr John Gibbs and another doctor who cannot be named for legal reasons, as those who had conspired to accuse her.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-65952393
Babies could’ve been saved’: Doctor who helped catch Lucy Letby blames hospital. The doctor who helped catch child-killer Lucy Letby has told ITV News that babies’ lives could have been saved if hospital bosses had contacted police sooner.
Dr Ravi Jayaram, who is a consultant pediatrician at the Countess of Chester Hospital, said he repeatedly raised concerns about his former colleague months before police were alerted.
ITV News – August 18, 2023
Agreed. Thanks Vlad for such an accurate description of Detective Helen Grus’s trial.
The retired Police Officer presiding as Judge was not interested in receiving Detective Grus’s extensive research, although finally, but not happily, he accepted her multiple journals. He made a comment that I hear frequently: “we’re not doctors”, which I believe is to say they therefore can’t interpret medical evidence. But often the evidence is just so blatant that I believe they could at least be suspicious. For example in my practice, early on, I saw/heard of patients who had serious adverse effects within hours of receiving the injection, including significant heart symptoms, stroke, and one death within 24 hours.