Communists in Paris working hard ‘to make it a better place’

According to the article, Macron’s reforms which are being protested, are ideal from the stand point of a classical liberal. He wants pay raises to be based on merit. Which would make us think of a likely follow-up question, “what the hell are they based on now”?

ANGER has erupted against French President Emmanuel Macron’s nationwide reforms with tear gas being unleashed on protestors in angry scenes on the streets of Paris and Nantes. Thousands took part in a rallies across the country over the leader’s enforced changes this morning.

[…] Teachers, train conductors and airline controllers walked off the job across France on Thursday, disrupting transport and public services in a test of public anger with President Emmanuel Macron’s reform drive.

 

Unions said one in four primary schools were on strike, while electricity generation dropped by over three gigawatts (GW), the equivalent of three nuclear reactors, as gas and electricity sector workers joined the strike.

Some 150 protest marches are scheduled, including two rallies starting at around 1300 GMT in Paris.

 

Opinion polls show a paradox: a majority of voters back the strike but an even bigger majority back the reforms, including cutting the number of public sector workers and introducing merit-based pay.

Coming from a background of informal classical thought, I tend to subscribe to the theory that there are no paradoxes in nature.

Therefore the two opposing majorities cited are likely because of a very poorly done survey where people were likely to answer some questions in a way which others would answer the opposite. Like tying together a question on abortion rights on a survey on economic reforms. When you add up the numbers you can pretend you have a paradox.

 

One of the tricks of the PoMo ‘university’

Readers of this site won’t be much surprised at the following clip, but its important anyway to understand the consistency, degree, and authority of Postmodernist thought within institutions that were once the very heart of Greek thought.

The temptation, and understandable one at that, is to assume that the teacher is just crazy. Anyone can see there are only two “genders”. But I suspect there is a sort of logic to the game that is being played here.

Growing up in Canada, determining sexual dimorphism on forms was typically done with the word SEX and two check boxes. M and F.

You would check the one that applied to your biological reality.

At one point it became the norm to equate the word sex as a noun, with the word sex as a verb. On forms, people (like me as a young teen for instance) would write after the question SEX: with a new checkbox that said “yes please” or some other play on the noun-verb thing.

The trick that was played was when postmodernist thinkers infused the culture with the word “gender” which rapidly replaced the word “sex” because it seemed to eliminate the titillating aspects of using the noun, “sex” as a verb.

But it was not a direct replacement.

Gender is a postmodern trick, in nearly exactly the same way Islam uses words in a fundamentally different way than we understand them (and then blame us for our failure to know what they meant). Gender means how you identify inside as your role relating to reproductive behaviour or anything related to reproductive identity as you imagine it to be at any time and for any reason, with perfect equity applied to that imaginary role to all others.

So when the student said there are only 2 genders, he of course meant, there are only two sexes.

When the professor acted as if he had committed a thought crime, she (probably) was acting on the false assumption that he was saying no one has a right to feel any other way than how they want to, yet  knowing full well that he meant biological reality.

This is much like the Islamic trick on a dozen important words and concepts. Like “defending the faith” for example, which muslims know to us means the right to protect our own religious and cultural beliefs and customs from violent attackers, but to islam means the right to impose their law and beliefs and values on all non-muslims as all resistance to Islam is in fact an affront to them so, ‘defending the faith; actually means imposing it.

We aren’t to know that though so that we will reasonably defend their right to do it, based on our understanding of the phrase.

“Justice” of course is a classic example. To us it means the application of reason and the scientific method to determine what actually took place, the truth of the events or statements and then the application of measured punishments to satisfy the community and address the objective reality of the situation to the best of our ability “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

In Islam it means application of sharia forced or otherwise and the truth of the matter is not even a factor. But that didn’t stop many in the West from supporting the Muslim Brotherhood’s “Freedom and Justice” party in Egypt headed by Mohammad Morsi, who’s sole mission was the implementation of sharia and creating the centre of the new Caliphate. Again, because of our understanding of the word.

Freedom in Islam also means the freedom to impose the sharia on all people whether they want it or not.

The left uses the same rhetorical devices although sometimes a little differently.

The word “capitalism” nearly everyone has been tricked into using when what they mean is a free market economy. Capitalism is a Marxist term where attributes that are patently false are imputed onto free markets, the most important of which is the critical distinction between what is a zero sum game and what is not. Free markets are simply not zero sum. When a transaction is informed, then both parties win.

The farmer needs money to live and make the farm go, and the person who has money finds it tastes rather bad and prefers to trade it for food.

Marxism would have us believe that free market transactions are all zero sum with an oppressor and a victim. Much as how they created race relations, sex-relations and all possible divisions of humanity in order to bring down what has been the most robust and cornucopia-like, low-suffering and environmentally friendly system the world has ever seen.

Along with its current ally, Islam, who also seeks the collapse of classical thought. And more and more it becomes clear exactly why.

Fake news has many forms

This woman who deliberately drove her car into a government building the other day, and “HAD AN ACCELERANT IN HER CAR” was identified as being female.

But the fact that she is a devout muslim was fully omitted from the story.

Car Slams Into Broward Sheriff’s Office Building, 2 Injured

Photo from source link video poster frame showing Camry

Follow CBSMIAMI.COM: Facebook | Twitter

PEMBROKE PARK (CBSMiami) — A car slammed into the Broward Sheriff’s Office substation Monday morning.

The red Toyota slammed into the building, located in Pembroke Park at 3201 W Hallandale Beach Blvd., around 11:30 a.m. and exploded, according to the Broward Sheriff’s Office.

 

The car went so far into the building that it was hard for Chopper4 to see it.

A man who was painting inside the building, Ben Mendez, rescued the female driver who was, according to BSO, mumbling at the time.

 

The Mendez said the woman was engulfed in flames when he jumped in to save her during his first day on the job.

“It was a big explosion like dynamite,” said Mendez. “I made a split decision and had to drag her out.”

She was taken to Memorial Regional Hospital as a trauma alert patient with life-threatening injuries.

 

A BSO employee twisted her ankle during the incident while she was trying to get away from the car.

There was no one in the community room, where the car hit, at the time but another day and the outcome could have been very different.

 

Mendez was supposed to be painting that room but there was a last minute change.

The cause of the crash is unknown at this time.

Deputies said they did find an accelerant inside the woman’s car.

Lo and behold:

“A half truth is the damndest of lies”

PEGIDA Founder Lutz Bachmann Banned from UK After Officials Find Speakers’ Corner Speech in Baggage

From Breitbart.UK:

PEGIDA founder Lutz Bachmann has been prevented from entering Britain to deliver a speech at Speakers’ Corner, partly on the grounds that he “knows” identitarian activist Martin Sellner.

Bachmann had planned on delivering a speech written by the Generation Identity leader, who was recently detained along with YouTube political pundit Brittany Pettibone and then ejected from the country, partly on the grounds that GI is “viewed in the UK as a right wing organization” and partly on the grounds that Pettibone intended to “interview Tommy Robinson — a far right leader whose materials and speeches incite racial hatred”, according to seemingly official documents.

 

Bachmann also shared a picture of a document which he claims is from the officials who stopped him, which asserts that PEGIDA is “involved in the promotion and incitement of racial hatred and division of communities” and notes that “[by] your own admission during interview you have known [Sellner] well for some years” as grounds for denying his Free Movement rights.

Please click through for the rest:

Fallout from Tommy’s Speech at Speaker’s Corner today

First, the actual speech, which you didn’t get to hear from the live feeds of it for reasons that escape me.

An excellent example of the fine debate style you can expect from muslims when you question their sense of right to rule over you.

Breitbart UK article on the event:

LONDON, United Kingdom — Thousands of free speech enthusiasts, alongside a handful of hard-left and Islamist opposition, gathered at Speakers’ Corner in London’s Hyde Park this afternoon to hear a speech written by Generation Identity’s Martin Sellner, delivered by former EDL leader Tommy Robinson.

Sellner was banned from entry by the UK government earlier this month, for daring to lead a right-wing organisation which sheds light on Islamic extremism and mass migration on the continent of Europe.

Robinson — formerly of the Rebel Media — delivered the speech to thousands who gathered in the snow at the historic Speaker’s Corner, the home of free speech in London for hundreds of years.

 

Marx, Lenin, Orwell, and others have famously given speeches at Speaker’s Corner, which is what drove Sellner and Robinson to pick the spot to deliver the speech (below).

Thousands listened to the speech live in person, while tens of thousands watched online.

The text of the speech follows over at BB.UK

Katie Hopkins discusses aspects of the issue of the extinction of White non-Muslims in the UK:

There is no doubt at all, more news to follow on this. It will be posted as we come to be aware of it.

 

 

 

A voice from one of the fleeing Swedes

Related article:

Translated by CrossWare with many thanks!

March 17, 2018
By Gellért Oláh

In Sweden the Muslims, and here the liberals, threatened the life of this woman

The Hungarian woman whose life was threatened, whose address was made public, and whose social media site was hacked recently moved home from Sweden because of the migrants. Countess Natalie previously gave an exclusive interview to M1 [Hungarian state television] about the attacks. She has been assigned former soldiers as bodyguards since then.

Countess Natalie has lived in Sweden for almost forty years, and moved to Hungary because of the deterioration of public safety. In an exclusive interview with M1 [television], she also described how regular attacks have become in Swedish cities, but the police ignore them.

The Hungarian-Swedish woman was threatened after the publication of the interview, her Facebook page was hacked, smear-campaign articles were released, and one of the liberal Internet portals even published her home address. After that, Natalie’s life was threatened, so she reported it to the police.

Countess Natalie is now protected by professional guards who are former soldiers, said Georg Spöttle. The security expert added: After speaking several times with a woman who returned from Sweden, they decided with a friend to provide her with personal protection. According to Georg Spöttle, because the facts listed by Natalie cannot be denied, her enemies are now trying to damage her reputation.

Georg Spöttle said: “This is a typical Leftist liberal smear campaign.” [This type of personal attack was the Communists’ favorite. They were the master of character assassination, and their intellectual descendants, the liberal-Bolsheviks, do it well, too. — Translator]

“Anyone who supports the government, anyone who is against migration, who wants a normal European life and who represents this view, they will try to smear and make life impossible for them,” he said.

It was not the first time that someone has been threatened for openly talking about the deterioration of public safety in Sweden because of migrants.

The Czech journalist Katerina Janouch wrote last year that because of the migrants, an increasing number of locals in Sweden are learning to shoot. In the Nordic state, the writer’s words were then called Russian propaganda by the Swedish Prime Minister, and criticized on Facebook. Among other things, he was quoted as saying that with her lies she pushed the cause of the xenophobic Czech President, Milos Zeman.

Germany

Also:

http://www.anonymousnews.ru/2017/01/22/bei-kritik-an-asylpolitik-ist-umgangsrecht-in-gefahr/

Right of access: Merkel’s regime wants to punish criticism of asylum policy by taking your children away. Whoever posts “xenophobic” statements on Facebook or demonstrates against “refugee homes” could soon lose the right of contact with his own child, even if no criminal offence was committed, according to the German Bar Association. A staff member of the “Deutscher Anwaltsverein” (German Lawyers’ Association) points to the extreme left and simultaneously to the left-wing racist milieu. Heiko Maas’s (immediate past Minister for Justice [sic]) fight against unpopular opinions is being fought on an increasingly wide front. As the magazine “Deutsche Anwaltsauskunft”, reports [that], a “xenophobic” posting on Facebook or participation in a Demonstration against a refugee shelter can lead to the loss of your right to contact with your own child.

H/T Oz-Rita

Operation Drunken Eagle for St. Patrick’s Day

This Reddit post suggests that people in various locations, but primarily the UK, although it would be equally needed in Canada, print and distribute the exact graphic, or at least message, that Lauren Southern was banned from the UK for doing.

There is nothing illegal about it and in fact it is encouraged by leftist groups when it is about Jesus. So there should be no legal danger in doing it whatsoever unless the government is flat out willing to admit that Islam gets special protection.

And while we all know it does, I do not think Western governments are ready to be honest about it at all just yet.

Sweden: Double-murder in Hallonbergen

An original translation by Tania Groth with much thanks!

From this Swedish News site:

STOCKHOLM — The mother of the family had her neck slashed. The carotid arteries on both sides of her neck had been severed. When the police arrived at the scene, one of the perpetrators was sitting astride the father stabbing him. Information reveals that one of those murdered was supposed to testify as witness to another murder, but now they have been murdered themselves. “They sat laughing when they came to the police station,” says a source in the police to News Today.

On Tuesday, News Today (Nyheter Idag) reported that two people were murdered in Hallonbergen in Northern Stockholm. When the police arrived at a residence, they were forced to open fire in order to stop the ongoing crime. A young man sat astride the father of the family, repeatedly stabbing him. Inside the home, the mother was found with her throat slit.

This is what a source within the Stockholm Police told “News Today”.

The carotid artery on the woman was severed on both sides of her throat.

“It was incredibly brutal. Both of them stabbed to death. The woman in the apartment had her throat slashed. When the police arrived, they shot towards one of the perpetrators. He (the perpetrator) was sitting astride the man stabbing him when the policeman shot at him — but missed,” said the source.

The couple were parents of young children. According to informants in the media who have spoken to sources within the police, the murder may have been a way to silence witnesses before an upcoming trial. According to the available information, there may be a connection to a previous murder in Stockholm where one of the parents may have been a witness.

“They sat and laughed”

Just one hour after the double murder, four people were arrested. Two are young men, 20 and 21 years old. The other two are boys, 15 and 16 years old respectively. The 15-year-old boy was released after interrogation. Prosecutor Olof Calmvik told Aftonbladet that the evidence against the 15-year-old was weak.

When the boys were brought to the police, they showed neither remorse nor understanding of what had happened, tells the source to News Today.

“They were very geared up when they came in. They sat and laughed and were really excited. It turns my stomach knowing that they will be out on the street again after a maximum of two years.”

According to sources in Aftonbladet, the perpetrators are good friends of two people who have been imprisoned for a murder — where the murdered father apparently was a witness. The four perpetrators that the police arrested have associations with the Northern Stockholm area.

“All of them have foreign-sounding names. I know that one is African. I think the rest have a background in the Middle East or North Africa,” said the source.