“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
This video claims that the youth are with le Penn, but they still call Generation Ident a “far right group”.
Generation Identitaire is below being painted as Nazis because they wish to slow and reverse the actual total suicide of French culture and people due to far left wing extremist policies of international socialism brought on by massive massive amounts of every type of alien culture, especially Islam.
See previous: http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/09/no-justice-for-Sébastien-jallamion/
An original translation by Ava Lon
April 3, 2017
by Christine Tasin
This verdict is a scandal, a slap to Sébastien, to all the victims, to all the patriots.
And here is the video he just left on his Facebook account, moving, revolting, disturbing.
Impressive because how could one not put oneself in his place, how could one not feel his despair and his revolt? He denounces the attacks and the Islamic state? He is dismissed from the police …
Revolting, because, dismissed from the police, he must depend on his former hierarchy to be able to find a job in the security field. Social death.
Revolting, because, beaten almost to death by two Muslims Arabs, then saved in extremis by a passing motorist, he kept scars and trauma from an attack that feels like retribution… and the aggressors will be free as a bird, ready to start again, insolvent — so they won’t pay any indemnity to Sébastien…
Worrisome, for his hesitant words, the emotion that you can almost feel on your skin, show that Sébastien is not well, although he asserts that he has not lost his courage.
Sébastien is at the end of his rope, because of Islam, because of the orchestrated Islamization, and he pays a high price for daring to stand up to the green plague.
Don’t give up, Sébastien; we are millions with you.
Thank you Ava Lon for the translation on this video:
Thank you Ava Lon for the heavy lifting.
Granted, most of that Post Modernist BS came from earlier French intellectuals. But France is paying a dear price for it.
Police fight back:
We must always remember that Rome was not built in a day. But it was almost certainly burned in one.
H/T M.
First, the article. Then more videos than anyone has time for.
Thank you Ava Lon for translating this set of basics on the riots:
Aulnay-sous-bois: the version of the policeman contradicts that of Théo
By Valeursactuelles.com / Tuesday February 7, 2017 at 14:35
One of the policemen under investigation after a violent arrest in Aulnay-sous-Bois told a different version of the story from [the version of] Theo, who claims to have been raped with a truncheon, reports BFM TV.
What happened during the arrest of Theo, the young man of 22 years, who claims to have been raped by police officers on Thursday night in Aulnay-sous-Bois? The investigation is under way to determine the exact circumstances of the evening. But according to BFM TV, the version reported by one of the police officers under investigation differs from that of the young man.
Insults and punch in the face
He was interviewed by the IGPN [General Inspectorate of the National Police] and told the story of the case. While patrolling with three other policemen in the “City of 3,000”, known to be a high place of the drug trafficking, he questions a group of ten individuals. The tone rises, the “young” defy the forces of order. Theo, according to the account of the police officer, catches one officer by the collar and insults him. Then he punches him in the face.
While he is taken to the side to be questioned, he struggles “very violently”. The baton intervenes at this point in the story: one of the policemen uses it to “hit Theo in the legs”, “to prevent him from kicking”. The scene was allegedly violent and beatings were allegedly been given in a kind of melee, one can read on the site of the chain of information live. The police officers say that there has never been any intention to commit rape.
Theo, 60 days of work disruption
Yet this is what Theo has said since his arrest. According to him, the policeman would have deliberately used his telescopic baton to “push him into the buttocks”. At the police station, the security forces called the ambulance, after finding that the arrested young man couldn’t sit down. In hospital, he was prescribed 60 days of work disruption.
[Translator’s comments]: This is what happened more or less (from what I read in different media): Theo was arrested and while fighting the cops off he sustained a tear to his anus. He claimed rape by police baton. Police denies that. President of the French Republic visits Theo in the hospital. Riots start all over France. Medical investigation confirms the version of the police officers.
Piles of stuff at this Twitter feed:
More will be added here, and almost certainly in the comments shortly.
Thank you Ava Lon for this translation.
Thank you Sandra Solomon for finding and translating this clip for us.
The host of this Egyptian media TV, Mohamed Al-Ghiety, interviewed the father of the muslim who attacked the Louvre, and brought forth some worthwhile ideas on him.
That the jihadi was a regular guy, bribed by Al-Qaeda and or the Islamic State, but either way for certain the Muslim Brotherhood, with a fat job for a fake company, and a mysterious wife, a hijabi, who appeared out of the blue around the same time.
This would explain not just the attack, but why it was so feeble. One might imagine that this person actually didn’t;t want to succeed. That getting put in a French hospital for a while was the best possible outcome. Then again, there was his social media posts.
For more on the host of this show, clearly a decent guy and a good analyst, but look at what he has to endure at the video on this link. A shoe down between an imam in a black ball gown and a Santa hat, and another guy.
This is really rather good. This author/philosopher explains his position with a lot of what we would expect but with some refreshing perspectives. For example, the idea that the left is allied with muslims because they are orphans. The working-class doesn’t want them. The Soviets are gone and they are pretty much friendless. I think its the least interesting aspect of the alliance but it is fun to think on.
According to Le Parisien,
(Thank you Ava Lon for the translation)
Attack at the Louvre: what is known about the Egyptian Abdallah E.-H., the main suspect
The Egyptian man, aged 28 or 29, reportedly landed at Roissy Charles-de-Gaulle airport on 26 January. He was coming from Dubai, where he would have obtained a visa for France.
The identity of the Louvre assailant, who attacked the soldiers of Operation Sentinel with a machete this Friday morning, is gradually becoming clear. He was hospitalized in serious condition at the Georges Pompidou hospital in the 15th Arrondissement of Paris, after being hit on the flank and buttocks by several gunshots. It is now known that the man is an Egyptian who was born in 1988.
If he did not have any ID, a cell phone and paint bombs were found in the backpacks he was wearing. These elements allegedly enabled the investigators to establish his identity: Abdallah E.-H. The man who rented a hotel room in Rue de Ponthieu, not far from the Champs-Elysées, in the very chic 8th Arrondissement of the capital. Police then quickly searched the premises.
A return ticket to Dubai
The search allegedly confirmed that the assailant arrived by air on January 26 at the Roissy Charles-de-Gaulle airport from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. He allegedly entered France with an Egyptian visa. The man had a return ticket to the UAE for Sunday February 5th. He was unknown to the French intelligence services; his identity was transmitted to Egypt for verification. In addition, DNA and fingerprint analyses are underway.
No explosives found on him
On Friday morning at around 9:45 the man burst into the gallery of the Carrousel du Louvre carrying two backpacks. After he approached the soldiers on patrol, he took out two machetes to attack them. According to prefect of Paris Michel Cadot, the man rushed at the soldiers, “uttered threats” and shouted “Allahu Akhbar”.
In the report, the aggressor, aged about thirty, was seriously wounded in the flank and buttocks. He was conscious when taken away by the ambulance. No explosives were found in his backpacks.
The man fought and risked being killed to try and gain entrance to the Louvre with a satchel full of PAINT BOMBS.
The Daily Mail has this report here as well.
Think about the damage to the treasures of Western civilization he could have done had he succeeded. And more importantly, lets consider the actual agenda of an agent that would be willing to risk his life to destroy the great works of art of our Wester heritage.
This was an attack on our culture on a scale we have not seen yet, had it been successful. The great works of art at the Louvre might have become mere legends. As it is, the focus on teaching things like art and music is diminishing rapidly with increased Islamic populations, as typically they will not allow their children to learn it.
So this would be in keeping not only with the Islamic prohibition on representational art, but on the Islamic notion of ‘jehillia’, or erasing the “time of ignorance” (the period of all history before the time of Mohammad). The Saudis do it when archeologists discover an artifact from before the time of Islam. They will not allow it to be uncovered or seen, and often destroy it if it relates to another religion. In Gaza, Muslims are working every day to dig up any Jewish artifact and destroy it on conveyor belts with smashing machines.
This probably was not the first attempt at the Louvre. And it doesn’t take a prophet to know this was coming. I believe it was the opening scene of the creators of South Park’s movie, Team America.
We need to learn, or at this stage, be willing to accept the facts of what Islam is, and what it wishes to do to us, our culture and our history, if he expect to ever develop policies that will serve the interests of a free and liberal democratic society.
Pretending Islam is just another form of Judaism or Christianity, a kind of curried Christianity as one British observer claimed, is virtue signalling at the highest imaginable cost.
*Check out this comment for more on this*