About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

3 Replies to “General Piquemal on the process of de-islamisation”

  2. Transcript – (worth repeating)

    ”So you know who I am, Christian Piquemal, president of the Circle of the Patriotic Citizens, a group that has been a registered association since October 2015 and which unites about 60-70 municipalities – a significant number of patriotic citizens. During this journey you saw numerous subjects that were tackled, and they, of course, contributed to enlightening us a little about the challenge of de-Islamizing Europe.
    In my speech I’m planning to tackle a particular aspect that hasn’t been discussed yet, that is, the loyalty and of the duty of engagement on the part of the essential ruling authorities of our country in the process of de-Islamization.
    We’ll see that this attitude of blindness on the part of the elites always leads to the exoneration of Islam. We’ll also find out that the elites are courting Islam and against those who are militating for the introduction of the Shariah, and for those who advocate the strict application of secularism, equality doesn’t exist.
    We’ll then underline the fact that the propagators of Shariah aim at the destruction of the light of loyalty that unites the French with their country and their nation. And also try to create felons uniquely loyal to the Ummah, which as you know, is the Islamic nation.

    To talk about Muslims as a human group is to enter into the logic of Shariah which doctrinally defines every Muslim as a member of the Ummah, as we just saw. The latter – the Ummah – finds itself structurally at war with every other human group that does not submit to the Islamic order.

    The duty of engaging against this lethal process in motion is therefore a major patriotic duty.

    Those in power, whoever they are, owe the citizens the truth. This truth has to be the keystone and the best bulwark against the danger of the dissemination and penetration of Shariah.

    Emil Zola said, “A society is only strong when it puts the truth in the bright sunlight.” How right he was! How can we get there, when a former French prime minister declared on the occasion of a reunion of authorities on dialogue with Islam?

    “It’s a great challenge for the coming years: proving that Islam is totally compatible with democracy, the Republic, and the equality of men and women.” How to get there, again, when Mgr. Michel Dubost, bishop of Evry (former Army bishop), pronounces those words: “In principle, I would prefer that churches become mosques rather than restaurants. “ By those words we note, alas, that the Catholic episcopate, almost in its entirety, has chosen the submission to the Shariah. The pope himself on several occasions opted for dependence on and submission to the Shariah.

    It’s clear that globally Christianity is kowtowing before Islam. The Church therefore bears a huge responsibility. It almost gave in, backed away, courted Islam and submitted to the Shariah.

    Concerning the army, a world I know well, the assessment is similar to the one concerning the Church: submission and Omerta [mafia law of silence]. We can repeat word for word the comments of a military person in an interview: those at headquarters don’t want to see; they close their eyes. It’s easier for them to make believe all is fine while inside all is extremely wrong.

    Directives from headquarters show the different treatment of soldiers of the Muslim faith. The stats show, in fact, that there are many more cases of rebellion, desertion and insubordination noted in the case of Muslim soldiers. Alas, there is also in the field of leaders on the local and national levels. In fact, the compromises to the Shariah, we’ll see, are numerous. The concessions in France at local, regional, municipal, and community levels. It shows that everywhere the retreat of the elites is impressive.

    Those concessions are a form of treason and partiality on their part. In fact, they are very numerous. I quote:

    ===>”The principal: 1 progressive de facto abolition of the ban on the female veil in the government spaces and public services, also in school and the workplace.

    2. generalization of the wearing of the veil in the zones with a strong Muslim majority with pressure on non-Muslims to do the same.

    3. Abolition of mixing the swimming pools and athletic places, and slowly in some primary schools.

    4. Pork-free meals in school cafeterias.

    5. Interdiction of the alcohol at official parties when Muslims are present.

    Progressive disappearance of businesses that selling non-halal deli and alcohol products, we just talked about —

    A subversive adoption of the rules of Shariah in municipalities with Muslim majorities!

    Subsidies of temples [mosques] and Muslim associations. No to the systematic maintenance of churches and chapels demolished or possibly slowly converted into mosques. The changing of names of communities with names that sound too Christian. The opening of Quranic schools.

    On the national level the concessions are even greater. [unintelligible] suppression of holidays from the Christian calendar replaced by Muslim holidays. Muslim holy prayer mandatory in large multinational companies and also in small or medium companies. General abolition of the ban on the veil everywhere. Modifications of programs and school books to suppress, especially in science and in history, everything that contradicts the Shariah. Hardening of laws against Islamophobia and progressive impossibility of all criticism of Muslim dogmas. Privileged teaching of Arabic in national education. Questioning of gay marriage and gender equality. And to top it all off, modification of foreign policy of an Islamized France with a massive immigration of Muslim provenance.

    We can see it, society in all its components: politics, education, security, army, economy, religion: are all touched by this. Everyone buries his head in the sand. And when someone, by chance, dares to tell the truth, he is despised, condemned, pilloried.

    What can we say about this assessment and the previous ones?

    For a state, as we all know, only the quality of its citizens counts, and as a consequence, their loyalty to the nation and their sincere adherence to societal systems: legal, cultural. That’s normal to expect from every citizen. It’s obvious that under this perspective there’s conflict of loyalties, between loyalty to Ummah and loyalty to France or other European nations. Obviously, these latter assessments are witness to their very strong incompatibility.

    Well, in a state of law, obviously secular, application of the laws that rule the state is imperative! The law is sovereign and unique and has to apply to everyone! And it cannot compete with other laws, especially the Shariah.

    In order to get to this result however, there is a condition: France has to recover the use of free speech and turn it into a weapon!

    If terrorism is fought by discretion and patience, by intelligence and infiltration, Islamism is fought by strong words and an absolute truth!

    But we note, alas, that France for the last couple of decades has backed away a lot and is ready to give away everything.

    Today, and regardless of who the next president will be, Shariah is a threat that is the most serious one, as much for our country as for other European countries. Whatever we do or do not do in the coming months will be critical for France and Europe.

    The truth as we saw, is the best rampart against Islamism. The state cannot in any case be partial towards the propagation of the Shariah. It cannot betray the people.

    Let us never forget the accurate words of Emile Zola:

    ===>”When you imprison the truth underground, it piles up there. It accumulates such an explosive power that on the day when it explodes, it blows everything up with it.” ”Glory to the country where we talk, shame to the country where we shut up” <====

    This will be my conclusion. You know France is living through an enormous tragedy and unless patriotic citzens rise up, she may die of it. So, everywhere like Zola and Clemenceau, let’s tell the truth with strength in order to save her!

  3. He gives a good speech.

    The treason he talks about comes from the corruption the left brings when it is in power. We have seen the corruption and treason in all western nations and it will continue as long as the left is in power. If civilization does fall (as I expect) it will continue longer but the traitors will received the punishment they deserve because the counter revolutionaries will not be bound by the constrictions of the law. The period after the counter revolution has succeeded is going to be the most dangerous because we will probably be at the mercy of revolutionary courts that will work to remove the corruption and treason but can easily turn into a means for revenge on people whose only crime was voting for the wrong party.