Marine le Pen on muslim street prayers in France, Media bias against all who wish to be French

This video claims that the youth are with le Penn, but they still call Generation Ident a “far right group”.

Generation Identitaire is below being painted as Nazis because they wish to slow and reverse the actual total suicide of French culture and people due to far left wing extremist policies of international socialism brought on by massive massive amounts of every type of alien culture, especially Islam.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

17 Replies to “Marine le Pen on muslim street prayers in France, Media bias against all who wish to be French”

  1. I like le Pen. The problem is the same problem of so many politicians, they just can not bring themselves to admit that islam is islam. She can’t seem to help herself, she condemns the acts of islam but then back peddles with the old song and dance that it is only the radicals. It is islam not the moderates or the so called radicals, it is the practice & doctrine of islam.

    • I wonder how much of that is indoctrination and how much is political strategy? If she calls out the entire religion she will turn off a lot of voters that would otherwise support her.

      • For the sake of France and Europe, one has to hope that it is political strategy as you suggest. She seems to be aware how grave the threat is.

          • Not just Europe, the entire world.

            Way to go, Richard! As the Liberals are so fond of saying, “Act locally, think globally.”

            Only when Islam is understood and addressed as a global threat, will any meaningful countermeasures begin to happen.

            I continue to find it utterly hilarious with regard to how Liberal bumper stickers from the 1960s have taken on new meaning. Like:

            Question authority.

            or:

            If you aren’t outraged, you aren’t paying attention.

      • It seems to work for Geert Wilders. Then again, the Dutch probably aren’t so far down the rabbit hole in terms of basing their national identity on being the western world’s most progressive (i.e., Communist) country.

  2. She said that the majority of Muslims are “the first to be shocked by the tendencies I am denouncing” and that they are the *victims* (aren’t they always?) of the “deplorable image that is driven by this hijacking of [their] religion”. Spooky stuff that one might hear from Obama or Trudeau or any Western politician, really. I hope that she is making a play for crucial Muslim votes here, given the sheer size of their voting block now, and actually does understand that the problem is Islam itself, not a hijacking of it by a minority of extremists. I pray that this is the case, actually.

    But she has good ideas. Implementing the policies that she has suggested, including deportations, might be sufficient to keep the Muslim population under control – for a while at least – but they would have to be constantly watched, and watched carefully. Islam is a danger, in and of itself. It seems nations can mostly live with it under very strict, special conditions – Israel, Singapore (arguably Russia, but certainly when Russia was part of the USSR, Muslims didn’t try much) – but it must always be monitored with suspicion because the ideology itself is poisonous to freedom and peace. The ideal would really be no Islam whatsoever.

    • The ideal would really be no Islam whatsoever.

      The world is heading towards this. Muslims continue to antagonize all other cultures such that, sooner or later, one of the major nuclear powers will finally decide that living with Islam is more trouble than living without it.

      The only question being; how many other cultures (especially here in the West) will have to perish before this tipping point is reached?

      Read, “The Three Conjectures“, to understand why an unmodified Islam has no chance of surviving in a nuclear-armed world. It is precisely the reason why Iran is desperately racing to build a nuclear arsenal. It is their only hope (and a futile one at that) of staving off the world’s wrath for having sponsored international terrorism for so long.

  3. channel 4 – Far-right documentary: Could Génération Identitaire help Le Pen to French election victory?

  4. Interview de Marine Le Pen par Yves Thréard dans Le Talk (LE FIGARO, 10/04/17, 12h00)

  5. So, Generation Identitaire are ‘confrontational’, how awful, so unlike those mobs of bum-lifters blocking the streets or those nice well-behaved Antifas pretending to be Che!

    • The most repugnant use of tactical language by the corporate media is the word, “Controversial”.

      Anything they don’t like is controversial if a small group of jackbooted commie thugs don’t like it, but is not even if 50% of the law abiding productive public do not like it.

      BREXIT is a controversial thing because it passed. But would not have been had it failed.

      Geert Wilders is controversial because he believes in classical liberalism and the right to exist as a Dutch people. But the far left leaders who want to destroy thousands of years of heritage, culture and law are not.

  6. channel 4 – France far right documentary: why are many young people turning to Marine Le Pen’s National Front?