“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
The remain in Canada arguments should be excellent exercises in creative sophistry and appeal to emotion. Could be instructive in an emergency for anyone.
Start time should be 8:00 ET but anyone joining later should be able to scroll back to the start.
UPDATE: At 8:36 PM ET the pro-Canada side used the “racism” dialectic. That is a great example of both sophistry and appeal to emotion.
This site has given what a lot of readers may think is disproportionate attention to what an outsider might think of as a minor internal police investigation of one of its officers.
In fact it is the clear and detailed example of the communist revolution playing out in real-time.
I found out about this new documentary watching Det. (Ret.) Donald Best on the Jason Levine show on X.com. Det. best reminded me that because of the case of Det. Grus, there is a new law/rule in Canada. Police are no longer allowed to launch a criminal investigation without permission from higher ups. Higher ups certainly means those officers who live in the balance between political interests, and actual criminal investigations which the police had been created to do.
Again, from the outside, it may sound like a good thing that police can’t launch a criminal investigation without permission. But seeing as how it was overtly stated during the trial/hearing of Helen Grus that her investigation into a cluster of baby deaths had political implications and therefore should not have been done, we can know for a fact that this new law/rule about policing in Canada is nothing other than Orwellian.
Better stated, it is nothing short of authoritarian communism as was so brilliantly illustrated in Orwell’s book, 1984, and Animal Farm.
Below is the Levigne Show from today. It also has a lot of excellent material on the state of Canada and Alberta and Quebec separatism. Both of which should now be supported providing they are moves to a Republic like state and not merely part of the dissolution of Canada to create a global Marxist polity.
Canadians and even Americans if you blow this last chance Donald J Trump has given you. Germany’s present is your future. For Canadians, it’s as soon as a few months.
1. Steve Hurley gives the practical on Alberta separation and then likely the rest of Canada fragmenting in the wake of a successful Alberta independance referendum. Turkey doesn’t mention how many Canadians would move to Alberta from Ontario if they manage to pull this off, which would be a large number of productive people as well as the parasites.
Quebec separation sentiments are typically very left wing though. The FLQ was a Marxist movement. Quebec may find if Alberta and Saskatchewan leaves, that for a while, they may have milk and eggs. But no refrigeration. Especially if Newfoundland cuts the power. That is the subject of another essay though. The main point is that Canada is a fragmentation grenade at this point and Alberta is likely to pull the pin, and most of us who are paying attention or have any love of individual rights are happy about it.
2. The following video was taken hours after the Oct. 7th attack on Israel. It appears to be in Toronto but was in a Canadian city.
This was not in response to an Israeli counter-strike, as one had not happened yet.
This was in celebration of the initial attack and the beginning of what the actual purpose of the attack was.
The tents had already been bought and the signs printed, well before Israel responded to the Hamas attack.
The Hamas attack did not weaken the Israeli military in any meaningful way, It may have killed or kidnapped a few reservists, but clearly the purpose of the attack was to provoke a strong Israeli ,military response, and then weaponize the response with a major global propaganda effort to make Israel into an unacceptable aggressor, delegitimize the state altogether and bring it down with international pressure, or at least obliterate public support and foment a new wave of antisemitism with common purpose with islam.
3. Communism will use one identity to destroy another. Feminism was a line of operation against the family, and the trans movement, a large and effective dialectic, was used to destroy feminism, even while calling itself 4th wave feminism.
Promoting homosexuality in a DEI, previously known as, “Affirmative Action” above and beyond equality was a line of action against heteronormativity and other components of Western Civilization. Not to say that gay people should be persecuted etc. But the use of homosexuality as a weapon was not about ending persecution. There are no rights gay people do not have that the majority of the population also do not have. Marriage was debatable as a right, since they already had the right to marry an opposite sex person, but they won that fight and everyone was fine with it.
The Trans-movement and various offshoots of the original gay pride movement is now in full effect, out to destroy the gay pride movement. It has become the normal. And the communist movement is about a constant attack on whatever the social order is, even when they created it in the first place.
One can debate the final purpose of this mission, if indeed there is one. But whatever it thinks it is doing, it will not end until the rest of us end it, or it achieves a total crushing destruction of all identity, wealth, means of creating wealth, individual rights and anything it an identify as being a component of Western Civilization. There will at some point be an anti-plumbing movement. And if that sounds ludicrous, explain to me how it is any more insane than the global warming effort to end Western productivity.
Sunday in Ottawa:
For those who are still confused, this explainer video on what “Queer” means is really good.
And to drive the point home, and yes, we’ve posted this before but its importance cannot be overstated. This video reveals that the Trans-movement, like so many others, which may have a mustard seed’s worth of truth in it or not, is in fact a dialectic to destroy Western identity, sexual and others.
Chris Dacey has more footage of Ottawa
Edmonton: A ‘Trans-person’ claims “Palestine is the moral compass of the world.”
This is about as true as it is true that this man is a woman in any way.
Back to Ottawa
Chris can be followed here
Thank you all for checking out this site.
I would like to leave this post with the following reminder about the United Nation’s Moral authority:
United Nations Security Council Resolution 138
United NationsSecurity Council Resolution 138 was adopted on June 23, 1960, after a complaint that the transfer of Adolf Eichmann to Israel from Argentina constituted a violation of the latter’s sovereignty. The Council declared that such acts, if repeated, could endanger international peace and security and requested that Israel make the appropriate reparation in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the rules of international law.
Argentina itself, repeatedly challenged to interpret its demand for “appropriate reparation,” declined to take up the challenge. Dr. Mario Amadeo, Argentina’s delegation chairman, was asked sharply for a “yes or no” answer by Soviet delegation chairman Arkady A. Sobolev in regard to the demand he voiced in the Council the previous day for Eichmann’s return and punishment of those guilty of abducting the Nazi from Argentina. Dr. Amadeo refused flatly to give such an answer, declaring that each delegation is entitled to make its own interpretation of what “appropriate reparation” might mean.[1]
During the debate, Israel told the Security Council that Eichmann had been captured by private individuals acting on their own behalf, that Eichmann had volunteered to come to Israel, and that the Israeli government only heard about it later without learning that he had come from Argentina.[2]
Israel held the view that the matter was beyond the Council’s competence and should instead be settled via direct bilateral negotiations.[3] Israel and Argentina did conduct further negotiations, and on August 3 issued a joint declaration admitting that Argentine sovereignty had been violated, but that the dispute had been resolved.[4]
Resolution 138 was approved by eight votes to none; the People’s Republic of Poland and the Soviet Union abstained. Argentina was present but did not participate in voting, making this resolution one of the last recorded instances of a state abstaining from voting under the nemo iudex in causa sua principle of Article 27(3) of the UN Charter.[5][6][7]
To be clear, I am speaking in official terms. Not street level reality. People who support Trump and individualism and liberty in Canada are mostly cowed into silence in social settings. Especially with strangers. It is of course, considered very impolite to bring up politics in new company. Curiously though, I find those on the left tend to bring it up within seconds of a fresh meeting because they don’t consider it politics. Just statements of obvious truth from their CBC inculcated perspective.
I really wasn’t feeling ‘Canada Day’ (Dominion Day in proper) yesterday so didn’t attend much of the official stuff. But walking around there were plenty of people who chatted, initially about Canadian banalities like the weather, but it didn’t take long to hit on “America” and how much they hated Donald Trump. Of course it’s rude of me to argue innit? But strangely not that rude to mention their personal hatred of Trump out of the blue to a stranger, gifted to them via the CBC and other COMINTERN propaganda outlets like CTV etc.as well as Mark Carney and his clear use of the Orwellian 3 Minutes of Hate to create unity in the one way Canada is allowed to. Profound hatred of the one liberty minded leader left in the West.
As a worthy mention, we have seen across the West, UK, US and Canada, political leaders excoriate or insist that “diversity is our strength” (Again, a purely Orwellian dialectic no less so than is “war is peace”, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength) and then go out into ethnic communities such as Sikh or Islamic ones and speak on the critical importance of unity and oneness of purpose. I mean the exact same politicians, not even just members of the same party.
So it is easy to see from one step removed, that the term, “Diversity is our strength” is in fact a dialectical narrative attack intended to get a people to accept being fractured beyond repair such that no form of resistance can be fomented against the coming tyranny. The groups meant to assist in that process, the one Stephen Coughlin refers to as deracination, are told to remain unified, and therefore strong. In fact, “Diversity is our strength” is the dialectical bomber used to destroy the truthful and once common phrase, “United we Stand, Divided We Fall”. The intention of course is to have us fall and it has worked very well in Canada.
This brings us to a comment by JU this morning in Reader’s Links that contained two videos. The dialectical narrative about Canada Day from the enemy-propaganda source, CBC, which shows a diverse Canada united only in whatever the state narrative of the day is, Vs. one by Canadians who are planning to take the one province not yet fully obliterated by mass immigration and communist indoctrination and who intends to become its own nation state.
CBC:
The narrative attacks and Orwellian double think in this video is so astonishingly frequent we could make a game out of it. 1 point for each lie or misrepresentation or narrative enforcement. I had to stop and smirk at 44 seconds when Big Brother Mark Carney slowly enunciates that he “has never been prouder to be Canadian”. I guess his use of “prouder” instead of the English, “More Proud” comes from when he explained previously in other videos that he is in fact an American, [I cannot find the video where I believe I remember him declaring himself to be American, so I may be mistaken on that. He holds 3 passports. United Kingdom, Ireland, and Canada but has not lived in Canada for ten years prior to his becoming the COMINTERN Viceroy there.] or when he explained that he was European. I imagine that at one point he must have exclaimed that he was British since he was governor of the Bank of England, (and they have NEVER had a governor of that institution who was not British) at one point, but I am pretty sure the British also would have said “more proud”. Note that literally the only unifying factor in this video is hatred of Trump, or things Trump has said. It is most magnificently CBC COMINTERN agitprop. The Diversity dialectic of course is raised as well.
The word “pride” is kicked around a lot in the CBC video although not totally sure about what. there is of course, a “Pride Flag” at the PMO, or was for all of June. Not sure if it is still there though as of July 2.
And now we get to what the few Canadians think who have not injected the Kool-Aid at three month intervals.
It’s hard to know if we are past the point of no return for Canada. Alberta appears to have a chance, but typically the enemies of Freedom and the nation state are a few steps ahead. So if there is to be a political solution to our problems at all in Canada, the one shot left at it will be if Alberta succeeds and then manages to create a stable Republic with enshrined individual rights similar to the US 1st and 2nd amendment. If they do, then maybe like minded people across Canada can follow suit.
It would be great if Ontario also succeeded from Canada and maybe left 100 yards around Parliament hill as all that is left of the Federal Government. We could make a museum of failed communist states across the road at the PMO if we did.
Those of you who held out hope that Alberta would be a place where liberty minded Canadians could move to in order to escape the destruction and deracination Carney is manufacturing for us, may find this interview distressing.
The thing about this sort of thing is that very few if anyone actually know what is going to happen. The most informed person possible could speak authoritatively on the thoughts and intentions of the people involved, and even methods and strategies. But in terms of outcomes, well, President Trump said he would stop the Russia Ukraine war his first day in office, and I believe he believed he would.
People have been sending me materials from all sides of the issue. But we haven’t posted much of anything on it yet, other than what we can glean of public sentiment in Alberta. The narrative attacks on this will be strong. Both subtle intellectual explanations as to why it can’t or won’t happen and blunt critical-theory attacks on all who wish to be self governing in Alberta. Listen to this from 8 to 18 minutes for an example of subtle and sophisticated explanations of why Alberta won’t can’t be self governing.
This site does its’ level best not to rage-bait or ‘shout the news’, but instead try to understand and extract any actual meaning that might be out there in the noise.
This seems like a decent place to start on Alberta. Daniel Smith speaks to a group of influential Alberta patriots and begins the topic of “The Elephant in the Room” at the 14 minute mark. She begins with very real and very meaningful electoral reform that would have changed the outcome of the Canadian election, which is why it will never happen in Canada.
Under Carney and his Trudeau era cabinet, this is probably the only hope for any part of Canada, or existing and legacy Canadians to have any chance at all for an individualist, more or less libertarian existence. Many are greeting her speech with skepticism, as they should. We cannot trust politicians anymore to represent our interests. This much is clear. But if we take her speech at face value, she is entering negotiations with Carney for an Alberta future which he will never agree to. And if he does, it is to lay a trap.
So she clearly states, and recently passed a bill making a referendum on separation, a practical possibility for the near future.
We shall see what we shall see.
The details are over at RAIR Foundation.
Below are the videos of his talk to whoever wanted to come out that night and hear him speak on this very important court case to end the abuse of prorogation by Trudeau in the federal court, and two brief sections of the Q&A.
There may be more salvageable from the QA segments. I had a few major screw ups that night with the camera. (Hint to others: Always use native lenses on important video shoots) One woman spoke at some length about the Maoist nature of Trudeau’s government and she spoke from experience of Mao’s China. It was amazing to hear. I hope somehow to see if it’s buried in my files. But please do listen to the head of the JCCF, John Carpay on this court case, and the two QA segments I do have are also interesting and important.
They are also working on a serious brief concerning CBDCs which I am quite anxious to see, and they had a pamphlet there for the public on the dangers of Digital ID. The JCCF is truly an individual rights law firm and a true Canadian treasure.
As usual, please consider clicking the little gear bottom right of the play window, and selecting the highest quality available for your best viewing enjoyment.
The talk
The two brief QA segments.
On an earlier post today, I alluded to a fire alarm trick at the federal court during the JCCF’s day to present evidence. This is what it was all about.
On the MSM
A question was asked about Mark Carney’s statement that he would use emergency powers to achieve govt policy. John had this to say:
This first one, the best bit is the first minute. The skit about Trump the fascist and the reveal. What follows though, while it has a lot of colour commentary also has some actual information and worth taking through to the end.
This second one has a lot of the expected colour commentary of important events and statements, but also has some substance throughout.
There is been a great deal of rumours and mutterings about her and her failures to correct major issues for which she was elected. Personally, I had hoped it was controlled op to try and separate her from her base. This is a common tactic. But at least the following explanation makes the case as to why people have a legitimate reason to be highly suspicious of her actual agenda
And when you add in this statement by Smith, it gets difficult to mumble one’s way past it
Some sad news about new laws in Alberta which really bring the government of Danielle Smith into question. Rewind to where Donald comes on in the first few minutes.
A few days ago, we published a video and article about the COMINTERN TRANTIFA protest of Danielle Smith as she announced the new laws that would protect children from being victims of the dialectic of sexual dimorphism.
Unfortunately at the time, we were not able to get in to see what she actually had to say. But we did get lots of video of those who feel no one should have a right to an opinion on a sphere of existence that the Communists have decided to take absolute control over. That video is immediately below:
(for maximum detail, please click the little gear at the bottom right of the play window right after you hit the play button, and adjust quality to the highest it offers you)
Up until now, we were not able to show you what Danielle actually said in her new office in the Capitol. Mostly because we didn’t think to look for it here. Thanks to R for sending it to us. It is very interesting and shows Danielle Smith as a skilled and reasonable politician. Not to mention her proper value set, and willingness to take risks to return from dialectical insanity to a healthy reality.
The other night due to very cold temperatures expected in Alberta, the following warning was sent out. Keep in mind, most power there is generated by oil and gas.
Essential needs only, don’t charge your E cars. OK then.
It is the axiomatic belief of this site that government creates problems and destroys solutions in order to move society from Socrates to Plato (as seen in the video at the bottom of the previous post) or put more simply, from an individualist state to one of total state power where the individual simply doesn’t exist, even conceptually.
During the first scammed energy crisis in our lifetime experience during the 1970s ( I would say Bullshit one, but that would be an actual solution as you will see in a moment) people were made to line up around the block because the world was running out of gas. Some of us will remember that. At the time, there was an article in the Ottawa Journal (before unions destroyed it as it was a conservative leaning paper) about a British pig farmer that converted pig excrement to fuel. He ran his whole farm on the output of his pigs. The money quote: “The smellier the sh*t, the better the fuel”.
So we knew back then that a certain amount of the West’s energy needs could be met by fermenting animal waste into methane presumably. Or by one process or another a massive amount of energy, and energy which would be carbon neutral if you buy into any of that GW nonsense.
More recently, during the Covid years, an Alberta fellow found a way of making cheap, CO2 free fuel out of ammonia. No idea how he does it but we posted an article on this site about it. David Menzies of the Rebel spoke with him. And the only things you get out of the article is, cheap fuel is easy to make which does not create atmospheric CO2, and NO ONE in government wanted to hear from him. NO ONE returned any of his calls. He had a solution to the whole fake problem as described by the neo-tyrannical governments of the West, the WEF and in general, the COMINTERN. But the last thing they wanted was a solution. In fact, the fellow who developed this method should probably consider himself lucky to be alive. But since the state has such control over media and all systems now, for the moment they don’t need to rely on such crude methods. For the moment.
Around 10 or 15 years ago, General Electric advertised a nuclear battery they were making about the size of a steamer trunk, which could be buried under an intersection and power a neighbourhood for about 100 years. This also solves the energy issue if one were to pretend that CO2 was a problem, rather than being the key to life which it actually is.
This solution was also ignored or demonized as was nuclear power in general. George Bush built a massive system of railways and a special vault inside Yucca Mountain to contain spent nuclear fuel. Obama shut it down. The science for building it was real. The science for shutting it down was not. Which could mean that Obama, like Trudeau and the rest of the COMINTERN know clearly that CO2 is not a problem. If it was the existential crisis they claim, they would be putting nuclear into every phone, closet, car and energy hungry thing in existence.
And now we have this:
Chinese company Betavolt has announced an atomic energy battery for consumers with a touted 50-year lifespan. The Betavolt BV100 will be the first product to launch using the firm’s new atomic battery technology, constructed using a nickel-63 isotope and diamond semiconductor material. Betavolt says its nuclear battery will target aerospace, AI devices, medical, MEMS systems, intelligent sensors, small drones, and robots – and may eventually mean manufacturers can sell smartphones that never need charging.
Buying an electronics product that can go without charging for 50 years would be amazing. But the BV100, which is in the pilot stage ahead of mass production, doesn’t offer a lot of power. This 15 x 15 x 5mm battery delivers 100 microwatts at 3 volts. The company says multiple BV100 batteries can be used together in series or parallel depending on device requirements, and Betavolt has plans to launch a 1-watt version of its atomic battery in 2025.
Many people assume that the tech for this was likely stolen. Lets say that’s true. It would mean a Western country had developed it, but chose not to make or market it. Why would that be I wonder?
And now for the most trivial aspect of all this, but still cannot go without saying:
Alberta doesn’t use a lot of solar or wind. But remember what happened in Texas a few years ago when the windmills froze and 700 people died of cold. Just imagine what would happen in Alberta if they allowed themselves to be bullied into the fantasy energy plans. A great deal of reality-centred people would be dead by now.
From our point of view, this would not be a problem for the COMINTERN centred government of Canada.
About three years ago, we posted a video many times advising people to ignore covid regs and not pay the fines based on it’s reasoning. In fact, we checked with UK, Canadian AND US lawyers who all agreed with every point of this video, and that the laws being enacted were in fact, Ultra vires. Yes. You heard it here first.
A lawyer on the Alberta ruling and reasoning. (The most important part of it in our opinion is the bit where the lawyer says: “The charter of rights is the supreme law of Canada… supposed to be, getting highly skeptical of that” because of course rule of law has been supplanted by dialectics in many or even most cases.)
The video we posted 3 years ago as often as we could get away with it:
The following post was written by an Alberta resident and political pundit, familiar with the candidates and issues of that province and this race. Thank you sir for sending this in!
On May 18, 2023, the Alberta debate between Premier Danielle Smith and Opposition Leader Rachel Notley took place.
The debate was moderated by CTV News and Global News. The moderation was done reasonably fairly, and even the panel that had been assembled to pose the questions was presented quite well as attended by Post Media, City News and CBC Alberta.
The participant’s apparel was interesting in that Premier Smith wore her party’s colours – blue, while Leader Notley wore Smith’s colours … blue! Hmmm! During the debate, Notley addressed her remarks directly at Smith, seemingly scolding Smith, all the while Smith directly connected to her audience through the cameral lens, presenting genuine smiles as she talked about Alberta and the prospects for a bright future.
It was clear from the outset that Rachel Notley was on the defence. On several occasions, questions were asking for specific answers. Smith gave those, while Notley stumbled around saying, “That was a good question” and paraphrased, “We need to look at ways to improve on the problem posed.” In other words, no real answer.
At times, the exchange got into mudslinging, with accusations of law breaking coming from Notley, and levelled at Smith. It should be noted that there is no evidence of breaking the law, or any charges even being contemplated. What is clear is that CBC and others propagated misleading information, something they seem to have a penchant for doing.
There was the normal promulgation and denial of numbers, as comparisons were made regarding job losses and revenue losses during Notley’s reign, and the job returns upon the UCP regaining leadership. What is clear, is that financial conditions deteriorated considerably across many industries including the oil and gas industry as well as support sectors while Notley was in power.
Both candidates made their fair share of projections into the future including both individuals making strong statements about NOT having medical patients being charged for doctor’s visits. This has been a major campaign issue to-date. Varied methods of revenue allocation have been discussion topics, and speculative thoughts have somehow been converted into promises going forward. Reality seems to be on another planet, especially whenever Notley presents her personal and party views.
But Smith, perhaps came up with the best line of the night when she said about Notley, “She doesn’t want to run on her record. And the reason she doesn’t want to run on her record is, it was an absolute disaster!” Record debts had been realized, and the major downturn in economy ultimately cost Notley her position as Premier.
It is questionable whether the hardliners on either side might be convinced otherwise, but a significant part of the fence-sitters might be swayed one way or another.
In the end, it will be a debate worth the record, to evaluate whether promises come true.