Barry Neufeld interview and presentation: When a Canadian tells truths about the Gender narrative

The write up can be seen at RAIR Foundation 

Barry is an interesting man. We first encountered him when he went to the Supreme Court in 2022 on what was a very complicated Defamation suit, but is entirely tied to the new way of things in the People’s Democratic Provinces of Canada.

Specifically on the genderqueer narrative attack.

Below are some videos never before published, at least here, about that Supreme Court hearing. For those who want to take the deep dive on this man, these are worth the effort.

For those that do not know, the word Queer, which used to be a mildly pejorative common term for homosexuals, was dialectically redefined to mean anyone who supports and promotes any group who’s victim or ‘oppressed’ status could be weaponized as an instrument of destruction against Western Civilization. In other words, you could be a straight male with children and be “queer” if you support the trans-narrative, or any kind of kink or minority that is being specifically utilized to destroy in any way, the Socratic-Aristotelian foundations of the West.

The following links are from October 15th, 2022

Barry Neufeld speaks after his appearance at the Supreme Court of Canada

Barry’s Lawyer presents what took place inside the court

Jack Fonseca speaks in support of Barry Neufeld, again on the lawn of the Supreme Court.

Returning to the present day, Barry finds himself in a similar position and for a similar reason. Mr. Neufeld was fined three questers of a million dollars by one of the dialectic-enforcement branch of the state, the Human Rights Tribunal, for saying something true about human sexuality.

Below is an interview we did with him, as well as his presentation on the evening of May 5th, 2026 at Jeff Evely’s de-transition event in Ottawa:

The presentation:

Ottawa Teacher, Amy McKay interview: As soon as she questioned the narrative on Gender Queer Theory she had to defend her licence in court

Important prelude:

I am trying to catch up on the people and events from May 5th and it has gotten a little complicated to figure out what has already been published here and what has not.

As it turns out, I have already published this interview with Amy McKay not that long ago. But the article we just wrote is quite different and offers perspective that is more generally applicable. So I will post it again. But if you have already watched the interview, feel free to skip this particular post.

The story can be read at RAIR Foundation

This interview took place during the more public presser of Jeff Evely’s May 5th event as a first effort to try and stop the state from mutilating and sterilizing children under the “Gender Affirming Care’ narrative attack label. It is the classic story of cancelation of anyone who cannot keep up with the revolutionary dialectics.

The example this site loves to use commonly is J. K. Rowling. A famously leftist author who, the moment she deviated from the leftist attack on the West by objecting to the introduction of men into women’s sports, she was not even allowed in to the cast party for the Harry Potter movies that she had written. Her books are beloved. So she is a good example. Of course they do this to high profile people as a message. But they do it to everyone in the most minor positions of authority. Like a high school teacher or a country doctor that dares notice a truth which is contrary to narrative established by consensus.

This is one high school teacher that came to support Jeff’s efforts on the hill that day. And, as it turns out, has found herself in court now to defend her teaching licence due to her failure to hate the right people and values.

Those of you who have not read or listened to the audiobook of 1984 in the last few years really would do well to do so again now. This is precisely the play in Canada and across much of the West, and even the US under Obama and Biden. The technology has changed, and the tactics vary. But the strategy is the same. Like with Islam, the left insists you hate who they tell you to hate, and believe what they tell you is truth. Jacinda Ardern even stated it plainly. But by that time, most are so demoralized already that they ignored it, or contextualized it to make it into something that wouldn’t shake their comfort level.

Amy McKay is facing total cancellation, at least professionally now, because she failed to hate BillBoard Chris, and failed to believe 2+2=5 in terms of gender queer narrative, which they mislabel a ‘theory’. A theory is a hypothesis that has data to support it, Gender queer theory is a Marxist destructive narrative attack on humanity that has an extraordinary amount of data opposing it, but was arrived at by consensus.

The model we use to describe events as they are taking place now across most of the West has predictive value. This goes a long way to affirming its credibility. That doesn’t make it perfect. But it does make it worth understanding.

Habermas, a second generation Frankfurt School thinker came up with the idea of Consensus theory. A leftist think tank comes up with a destructive narrative attack, like Gender Queer theory or anthropogenic Global Warming, and imposes it claiming it was a consensus, in this case meaning a creation by said think tank, and then imposed on the rest of us by using critical theory, “racist-transphobe-bigot” etc against anyone who tries to tell the truth on these issues. Amy’s story is definitely a classic example. But anyone who happens across this post can surely think of many, many more. Both in public life as well as people they likely know in their own orbits.

Older posts and videos from the same May 5th event:

Interview with two detransitioners on their personal stories about the consequences of the drugs and surgeries connected to the Trans-gender dialectic.

Chris Fleury, constitutional Lawyer fights to get men out of women’s prisons

 

 

Constitutional Lawyer, Chris Fleury fights to get men out of women’s prisons

This was part of Jeff Evely’s Outstanding De-trans event on May 5th.

One of the speakers was Constitutional Lawyer, Chris Fleury who is in litigation against the State in Canada to stop men from being admitted to Women’s prisons.

This story is convoluted. But needs to be understood as it is a perfectly fitted puzzle piece of the new dialectically operated Canada, as opposed to one that operated on the basis of actual empirical reality.

In other words, if a man claims he identifies as a women, somehow that qualifies him to be put into a woman’s correctional facility. Interestingly, as far as we know, no women who identifies as a man has chosen to be put into a men’s prison. Which tells you a lot already.

In any case, that is the dialectic. The destruction of our reality down to the roots. It is the twisting of concepts, backed up by social pressures such as critical theory and being cancelled for defending reality, that makes it a dialectical system as opposed to a reality based one. You know. Where men are men and women are women.

RAIR has the write up here. 

We interviewed Chris shortly before his actual presentation at the Vanier Biker’s Church which you can see below.

His presentation was very important and different information from the interview:

After all the invited speakers had their opportunity to present on their aspect of the issue, there was a panel discussion with all the speakers and a Q&A.

RAIR Foundation managed to get a question in which spoke more to Chris’s expertise than the rest.

Please read the story at RAIR Foundation. 

Interview with 2 women who, after being put through the trans-sexual meat grinder de-transitioned and dedicated themselves to sounding alarms

The following interview was recorded on Monday evening, May 4th, and was a prelude to a conference at Parliament Hill begging Parliament to recall bill C-4 and protect children from the crazy dangerous ideology of Critical Gender Theory.

The event was a conference that Jeff Evely, a true Canadian hero put together with a lot of well known activists such as the two women interviewed in the videos below, as well as people like anti-trans activist, Scott Nugent from Matt Walsh’s film, What is a Woman?

This interview was difficult to do. At one point I had to take a break to recover from the impact of the first session, and then resume after a while and dig deeper into their personal experience.

The accompanying article is at RAIR Foundation and fleshes this out quite a bit. It is recommended.

For this site I want to take a different approach.

We discuss dialectics a lot in terms of communist theory. The Reader’s Links post every night has a decent definition. But another way of looking at it is that dialectics is merely finding ways of destroying things, but in a particular way. Like creating (or capturing as the case may be) an agency called, The Human Rights Commission where its sole purpose and effect is to destroy human rights by pitting collective rights, (which can be arbitrarily and whimsically defined), to destroy individual, or as we like to call them, real rights.

Many people when you mention the Hegelian dialectic respond with, “Oh! Thesis-counter thesis, synthesis!” Yeah I guess. But that doesn’t carry a lot of meaning really. If you flesh it out, where you take a thing, use it destroy itself and another thing such as its opposite and destroy both, well now baby you’re talkin dialectics!

And I can’t think of a better example than the trans movement. They take a person of one of the two sexes, and then create a synthesis by smashing it against its opposite sex using drugs and surgeries and ending up with something totally new. Broken, sterile as a rule, but new. Men cannot become women and same with the reverse. But both concepts are destroyed in the process, and that is the real aim. To obliterate the concept of “heteronormativity” in the human consciousness.

None of this is said to the people they experiment on though. They are just reassured that this will solve whatever problem they imagined they had, or really had. From normal teenaged girl stuff to serious trauma, they are often told that the solution lies in becoming sterilized and then sexually mutilated till whatever they have left as genitals don’t actually work at all.

It is also crucial to understand that in Canada, it is not a crime for an agent of the state, anything from a kindergarten teacher to a fireman or a cop or whatever, to convince a child to go to one of the spay & neuter abattoirs, dialectically named, “Trans-affirming Care” clinics and get mangled, but it is a jail-able offence to talk a child out of it. It is in the language of bill C4.

The bill is called the “Anti-Conversion therapy bill” and according to the bill, if you take a child who identifies as ‘trans’ and convince him to identify as ‘cis’ then you have done “conversion therapy” and must be jailed.

This serves another dialectical purpose. To establish that children belong to the state to do whatever they wish with them, and parents only have the responsibility to feed and house and clothe them. But not to teach them anything that might contradict a state narrative. Whatever it happens to be that day.

This is a major assault on reality at many levels. There is no such thing as transexual, (barring the extremely rare genetic conditions that generally get corrected at birth and even that is not trans-sexual, just a sort of generic error.) And taking a gay or lesbian person and altering them into a sort of simulacrum or imitation of the opposite sex would be absolutely the most extreme form of conversion therapy I can think of.

From Lesbian to straight man, from gay man to hetero women.

In any case, if this interview moves you, please share the videos with anyone and everyone you know who may have children or adolescents that are even toying with the idea of ruining the rest of their lives by indulging a corrupted and ideologically captured medical industry to mutilate those children.

 

There is one more video that we post fairly often here on this subject. It traces the history of this movement back to, what else, communist and dialectical roots. It is highly, highly recommended.

There will be a series of videos on the event on the 5th as the weeks progress. It takes time and effort to edit and prepare these videos. But more should follow hopefully as soon as tomorrow.

One last thought. MANY people we speak to on this and other issues which are in our opinion vectors of the communist revolution that has transformed Canada, will say this is about corruption. It is about doctors on the take. They make huge cash doing this, as the state pays (but only to trans, not to get repaired after) but this is not about corruption in the typical sense. Corruption is a tool by those who design these dialectic attacks to achieve the ideological ends. Transsexualism was in fact originally considered “4th wave feminism” and the idea most certainly was that there are no men or women. There are no differences between them and the notion of differences was cultural and must be destroyed. Presenting large numbers of of people to the public as obviously an amalgam of male traits and female traits will influence how people think of sexual dimorphism in our species. They want it, that beautiful thing, destroyed. Because that is what communism is about. And corruption of industries is a method of capturing them. It is the means. Not the ends.

Please do leave a comment. It would be appreciated by myself and all who participated in the events of Tuesday at Parliament Hill and Biker’s Church.

Interview with Jeff Evely on his walking in the woods ticket, and his upcoming event on May 5th

Please read the story over at RAIR as it has additional details about the ticket that will catch anyone up who isn’t already familiar with the story up to now.

But this has all the details for the May 5th event.

Attn: those close to Ottawa, please book off May 5th for THIS EVENT

Two videos on the movement to spay, neuter and mutilate children and adults under the rubric of ‘Transexualism’ – a thing which cannot exist.

Given the newest spate of murders done by people who are living under the delusion that they can be made whole by monsterizing themselves, it seems like a good time to post the two videos which best explain the entire phenomenon overall.

First, a quick note about human thought.

When we are unhappy, or suffering, we feel generally that we need to cast blame somewhere. Rarely on ourselves, usually on other people\, and probably mostly incorrectly.

Now if a person had decided to undergo surgery and chemical therapies that is in nearly all cases, guaranteed to make them profoundly unhappy, and I cannot emphasize profound, enough, it may create an additional logic trap.

If a family was supportive of the ‘transition’, then its possible the person who may feel they have made a tremendous mistake, could blame the family for encouraging this, or not stopping them from doing this set of procedures.

On the other hand, if the family was not supportive, the same person under the same circumstances, may blame the family’s lack of support for why they feel so damned awful.

Maybe this goes at least part way as to why some people undergoing these procedures have issues with their family.

Then there is the chicken and egg approach, which we think is incorrect. Most might ask if the mentally unwell person choses to be trans, or if the trans person becomes mentally unwell. It is more likely that one amplifies the other until it becomes seriously problematic. If I had to make a literal phrase for it, a synergy of evil. Had the slightly unwell person not been talked into the trans-nonsense, then their mental issues likely would not have blossomed into something that results in murdering others, family or strangers, or kids at a Christian school. It may have actually been within the normal set of neurosis that defines our species for that matter.

Another factor is that the Trans movement is actually fourth wave feminism. Feminism itself is a dialectic attack on the family, and perhaps women in particular. But when it moved to 4th wave, the idea that there are no men and women and that people’s sex, or ‘gender’ is purely fungible, then the attack on women becomes clearer as men dominate women’s sports, and women are being sterilized and otherwise taken out of any potential for a family.

Then there is the results of the surgery and drugs. Watch the second video for some details on that. At the end of the day, one cannot tamper with the body and hormone levels like this and not expect bad results. A human is not a computer where you can swap out a hard drive for another one and have it work about the same. But then again, even in a computer, if you swap out a PC hard drive for an Apple one, you get a chunk of metal that does pretty much nothing.

And there is no reformatting for humans as of yet.

Dr. Ann Gillies:

One last short video that goes to how the Trans-movement is a communist effort which laser paints certain targets. The following clip is from a ‘Trans-rights’ protest on Bank Street in Ottawa a couple of years ago.

About that man who shot his family at a hockey game in Rhode Island…

Channel 10 in Rode Island reported that it was a man dressed as a woman. He shot his wife and kids.

More:

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-young-girl-dead-4-injured-in-shooting-at-rhode-island-ice-skating-rink

SS Tattoo is interesting.

 

A good look at the man who murdered his family and others while wearing a dress

This is the best video so far on the background of the young man who murdered all those people in British Columbia while wearing a woman’s dress.

And while most of the details will be known to most of you, one line really caught my attention. From the perspective of this website, it is the tell. The most revealing and important aspect of this entire story, and for that matter, a solid data point that the Trans BS is actually an active measure of sorts and a Line of Operation for sure, right below Feminism as a Line of Effort. After all, the Trans thing was first launched as 4th wave feminism.

The line is in the video at these times:

134
00:06:17,440 –> 00:06:20,800
And CTV News used an AI filter to make the

135
00:06:20,800 –> 00:06:23,840
shooter look more female.

Think about that.

This young man slaughtered many people, including his own family.

And CTV is so committed to the Trans lie, that they applied a filter to create more of an illusion that the man is actually a woman.

For anyone lost for words I have one to offer.

Dialectics.

It would be great if the few people that read this site would write a comment under this post with why they do or don’t believe that media is at least in part, responsible for this and similar atrocities, and to what extent they feel it is, or is not.

Curious propaganda mural near the CBC building on Sparks St. Mall in Ottawa

Narrative propaganda in Canada is increasing in frequency quite dramatically. From ‘Pride’ flags promoting the Trans and LGBTQ dialectic in every community centre and hung on the front wall of any Church that doesn’t want to find its building in flames. Or at least I suspect that’s how it works. Someone needs to do a study on the six hundred Churches that have been burned down in Canada and see how many of them refused to go along what we think of as the literal negation of Deuteronomy, by hanging a gay-trans etc. pride flag on their buildings. A Demonic or diabolical version of the Lamb’s Blood from Exodus. Classic communist thinking if this is indeed the case.

And at this point, the colour spectrum ROYGBIV has been pretty much hijacked as a symbol for celebrating homosexuality. Perhaps because it originally was a symbol of God’s Covenant with Man after the Flood. And Communism seems to have a curious obsession with negating the symbols of Judaism and Christianity for some reason. Maybe it’s all those poems Karl Marx write to Satan.  Itself a curious thing to do really. Indifference to alternative sexuality so long as it’s among consensual adults seems like the truly liberal thing to do. But of course, Leftist use of sexual identity is after all, like multiculturalism, a dialectic attack on purposeful sexuality. Sex that leads to relationships that cause and raise the next generation of people. Any outlet for the sexual impulse that avoids reproduction appears to be what the left doesn’t just celebrate, but will criminalize you for not celebrating. Thinking again of the Canadian veteran woman who was debanked just for asking her branch manager if instead of having 5 Gay Pride flags in front of that branch, maybe they could have 4 and one Canadian flag. That was enough to have all her services cancelled.

All this was inspired by a curious mural which is on Sparks St. a block from the CBC HQ and a block from Parliament Hill. It features all the iconic animals of Canada. Except they have been represented as having rainbow fur and feathers. Which reminds us of a classic Alex Jones video.

There was a viral clip of Alex Jones yelling about “They’re turning the freeaking frogs gay”. Of course this was in response to an RFK Jr. talk on how atrazine in fact does exactly that, or morph them into females etc.

But it kinda looks like whoever authorized this mural on Sparks St. is if not turning all Canadian wildlife gay, at least misrepresenting them that way.

Gay animals means extinct in one generation. So generally, no. That doesn’t happen. Animals that are gay end in one generation. Like Humans.

And just in case you think we are kidding about the use of homosexuality and other forms of sex as a dialectic weapon intended to negate all aspects of culture and for that matter, reality itself. check out the hit new play on pan-sexual Anne Frank.

Quoting the article [Bold is mine]:

A show has turned the tragedy of Anne Frank into an ‘inclusive’ commentary on wokeness. And New York City audiences can’t get enough.

I recently saw the most brilliant new musical in New York City. It’s not on Broadway. It’s not even in a traditional theatre.

It’s at a bar and performance space called AsylumNYC. And it lives up to the name of its venue.

Slam Frank, whose developmental run opened on September 17 and closes on October 26, is a reimagining of the story of Anne Frank that asks: What if her diary were inclusive? What if we addressed the lack of queer representation in that attic? What if we finally told the story of the Holocaust in a way that honours all people, not just the white people it has always centred on?

And now the left has found a way to dissolve the Holocaust and the story of near genocide of the World’s Jewish population using the alt.sex narrative attacks, I really hope it’s starting to come into focus. This isn’t a function of tolerance of the differently sexual. This is using any form of sexuality that can be imagined as a weapon against normalcy.

Mia Hughes presentation on The Trans phenomenon: An excellent primer on one of the most destructive attacks against civilization (plus commentary)

On Friday evening, Oct. 17th, Mia Hughes, a woman who came from the progressive left, (more as a current default than as a choice one might guess), gave a talk on the staggering harm the trans-narrative was doing to children.

This is a well presented and detailed description of the components of the issue.

While we tend to see it more from the Marxist Line of Operation angle than as a social phenomenon than she does, there is nothing incorrect or wrong with the presentation at all. In fact it may be the exact way to go to send to associates who are uncertain about the issue but aren’t ready to be thrown into the deep end of the pool on dialectics.

Below, her presentation and the Q&A, which as often is the case, is as informative as the presentation itself.

The Q&A:

We are of course, grateful to anyone willing to step out into the light and present a counter-narrative view on any of the various COMINTERN mass line narrative attacks. As Mia points out, it was the (Alinsky 13, critical theory) attacks on J.K. Rowling that actually inspired Mia to begin to really look into this. It should have been so for all of us for that matter.

As much or more damage was done to Nurse Amy Hamm in British Columbia for just liking a billboard with J.K. Rowling on it.

A couple of notes of interest:

What is interesting to me, was how, as is predicted by a solid understanding of Marxism, that each new wave of the revolution would negate the previous wave.

This can be seen in this instance by the common use of the pejorative, “TERF”, which Mia used a few times during her presentation, while quoting Trans-Activists. This is a term used by supporters of the Trans-LoO (Line of Operation) against feminists who oppose the Trans-narrative. And even those feminist themselves are a line of action against the traditional family.

TERF, as RAIR had the chance to ask Mia, is defined as “Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist”.

So the critical theory attack word, “TERF” is used to delegitimize an actual radical feminist who will not accept that a man who says he is a women, with or without medical procedures, is a woman. A 1984 MINITRU statement if ever there was one.

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

? George Orwell, 1984

The 4th wave of feminism which includes gender theory, negates all previous waves of feminism which have become normalized to some degree now.

(One could argue that this means that 4th wave feminism, which includes Gender theory, has in practice, given far more power back to men willing to say they were women, than they ever had in the West previously. Men can now be put into women’s prisons! Even if they were convicted for raping women. But communist ‘reasoning’ creates a buyer’s market for irony when one doesn’t;’t understand its purpose. Which is destruction.)

Data point: Headline from the Daily Mail:

Justin Trudeau’s government awards MEDAL to ‘champion of diversity’ trans activist who got Canada’s oldest rape shelter defunded for refusing to house transgender women

A transgender activist who had city funding stripped from Canada‘s oldest rape shelter has been awarded a medal as a ‘champion of diversity’.

Morgane Oger, a transgender woman, was given a Meritorious Service Medal by Canadian Governor-General Mary Simon on December 7.

Official photos show her receiving the award alongside dozens of other Canadians honored for their ‘exceptional deeds’.

Oger said she was ‘feeling so grateful’ to get a medal for ‘furthering the legal protections of transgender Canadians’.

Now this is where Hanlon’s Razor meets the road.

There is no way that Trudeau could do this without the conscious intent to assist the revolution through dialectic destruction of norms. This cannot be viewed as incompetence. A hundred times so when you examine all his other policies. Stupidity cannot always result in one set of results which are highly abstract. Only intent can.

If I had to define Hegelian Dialectics in a sentence, this would be one of the ways I would do it.

‘A series of slippery or deceptive explanations and other rhetorical devices used to cover for a result which is entirely different than the one being broadcast, and always, always results in destruction of a state of normalcy in Western Civilization.’

So each mass-line Narrative attack, ‘safe and effective’, ‘the Religion of Peace’, CO2 causes catastrophic global warming’, ‘mass children’s graves under residential schools’ and more than I can ever remember at a single sitting, are always both untrue, and lead to a consequence which advances communism.

To illustrate that point, the mass graves mass-line-narrative-attack has brought us to this point in Canada now:

So we have one of the Marxist results from the Mass Graves dialectic. The negation of private property. We will ignore for the moment the curious wording of the diktat where it says: “Without any prior notice to the landowners” because given the rest of the letter, that could be anyone. But assuming they meant the people who bought the property and have a title and deed to it, we have a pluperfect set of events here. A ludicrous and demonstrably untrue claim used to negate the concept of private property as it has always been used and understood in states resembling a republic, to its completion in a specific set of cases. Much like Global Warming is being used to destroy industry and a dozen other liberties such as Richmond BC negates property rights based on ‘carbon score’ and enforced by the coming digital ID.

And on point, the fact that a man is not a woman just by saying so, or for any other reason.

As Amy illustrated with her trick question in her presentation: “if there are 250,000 kids in the School system today, how many of them are trans?” Answer: None. there is no such thing.

Mia’s presentation offers two paths to an explanation of the huge amount of attention and large number of individuals who undergo this awful and monstrous set of procedures. The social contagion aspect, which is certainly true, especially when coupled with corruption of those who actually make a lot of money from making the drugs and doing the procedures, and the philosophical motivations, Which is where we tend to place the emphasis here at Vlad.

The video below we have posted many times before, because it is worth posting as often as needed. It explains what we suspect is the actual accelerant which made the issue mainstream:

One more additional thought:

Mia does speak on the social contagion aspect of the spread of Trans-ideology. This is undeniably true. But we posit that the social contagion is deliberately spread by the media for the purpose of a dialectic attack, exactly as they did Covid, Covid19 origin disinformation, a dozen things concerning Trump, the mass graves narrative and countless others on an infinite repeat loop, occasionally with a change of order of importance.

But what is also true, is teachers and school curricula complete with flags, symbols and classroom materials, that offer a student prestige and status merely for claiming one of the all-you-can-believe-buffet of identities that trans offers, so long as it isn’t one of an actual human biological reality. And giving a child instant higher status just for saying something is quite an incentive. It’s amazing that all of them haven’t taken the chance.

Another month, another tranny does a mass murder of the most innocent victims they can think of: But why?

This is all over the place. For the typical approach to this event, go anywhere else.

Our interest is in the narratives that appear to have created the trans-movement as a form of kinetic attack vector against what some Trans-activists Call, “The Three Cs.”

To put it bluntly, like so many narratives which are attacking every definable attribute of Western civilization, the point is never the point. The revolution is always the point.

With abortion, “My body my choice” was the very last thing it was about. Killing babies, diminishing the value of human life and redefining murder so that it can be redefined as needs be, that was the point among other destructive consequences. And watch. Life as a sacred thing was negated, but life as a legal right will not apply to more and more groups. Kulaks, Jewish people, whatever the state feels is in the way of the God-like state will find itself without a right to life. As Islam does to all non-Muslims.

You can if you like, insert your own list of intersectional narrative attacks here, or better, re-watch this Stephen Coughlin interview. There is an actual graph of intersectional attacks against Western attributes in this briefing. In fact, I think he actually predicts the Trans-movement as being foot soldiers against Christianity and for the communist revolution. If he doesn’t here, he does in others.

Like other narrative attacks, there may be a grain of truth at its core. Are there some people who are biologically not fully one sex or the other? Did “Sex-change” surgeries exist before the modern trans movement? Yes. Does everyone who gets this surgery do it because they want to be a jihadi for communism? No. But the modern trans movement was created as an intersectional line of attack on sexual dimorphism and hetero-normalcy.

Yes, I post this video a lot. But when you have the answer and most don’t seem to get it, well just keep posting it I guess. Frankly, I think man’s search for novelty is going to destroy us. To a degree, that thirst for novelty may be in part what drives news to be rage bait alongside allowable counter-narratives, instead of any meaningful look at what really drives the events.

Between the video above and the one below, you should see what drives this frequent set of attacks by people who have allowed the state to sterilize and mutilate them, sexually and in other ways.

One of the key bits of evidence of the fact that the Trans-movement is in fact a narrative attack is the way that all push the Trans-line of operation are amplified while all who oppose it, and especially, especially those who did the surgery and drugs and regret it and try to warn others are silenced, threatened, intimidated and attenuated in every possible way, as appears to be the case even with this most recent shooter of Catholic children.

Minneapolis school shooter Robin Westman confessed he was ‘tired of being trans’: ‘I wish I never brain-washed myself’

At this point, we hear in almost every discipline that has any societal influence, that all who work in it must “fudge the data” to conform to a narrative. This is in medicine, art, (you can’t find a movie or TV show that doesn’t check most or all boxes for societal revolution at this point)

For those that are unaware of the current mass murder of people by a person who buys into the trans-movement to one degree or another, here is a list below.

This RAIR article also lists a lot of the previous trans shooters, that we have been able to find out about. Interestingly, he managed to deck out his weapons in exactly the same way, but with different messaging, than the NZ man who did the mass murder at a couple of Christ Church Mosques several years ago. Many wouldn’t know about that of course, because all actual materials concerning that attack was memory holed within hours. Here are some images from his manifesto embedded into this interview with retired CIA Chief of Station, Brad Johnson about that attack though:

In fact, he even had Russian writing on one of his magazines. This would suggest taking stylistic influence from the NZ mosque shooter, although clearly not ideological.

According to Google Image translate, this is what it says:

So there are several streams of thought in this person’s head that motivated this attack. The celebrity status accorded to mass murderers, the various procedures that ‘trans’ people undergo which most certainly creates hatred and hostility from chemical imbalances, and for many, the actual surgeries and so on they undergo is in fact an act of commitment and fealty to the communist revolution.

It is no surprise that as they mature a little and realize how horribly they ruined any chance for a happy normal life they act out.

Matt Alexander: Fired from school board for refusing to affirm and celebrate various sexual identities to three year olds

Canada, even in small town Ontario, is stunningly communist.

We have defined communism many times as moving from fact and truth based institutions, to narrative driven ones.

This is an amazing example. This man’s entire family has been cancelled in one way or another because they refused to abandon values and beliefs which have been central to Canadian identity since the day of it’s founding.

There is an excellent summary of this video at RAIR Foundation. But do give it a listen please. Share it around, especially to any American friends or family or colleagues you have. Maybe if it makes it to Vice President J.D. Vance, he can give another public excoriation to Canada. One that would be richly deserved, and this could be a key data point in his talk.

Once again, free countries appear to be desperately relying on America to save us. Maybe this time though, Canada can actually become part of the US.

For those who haven’t seen it yet, JD Vance had a few words to say about the state of Europe at the 61st Munich Security Conference on February 14, 2025,

Canada, a fragmentation grenade with the pin partially pulled, and the trans-movement+Islam now fully negating the gay pride movement: Links 1 for August 26, 2025

1. Steve Hurley gives the practical on Alberta separation and then likely the rest of Canada fragmenting in the wake of a successful Alberta independance referendum. Turkey doesn’t mention how many Canadians would move to Alberta from Ontario if they manage to pull this off, which would be a large number of productive people as well as the parasites.

Quebec separation sentiments are typically very left wing though. The FLQ was a Marxist movement. Quebec may find if Alberta and Saskatchewan leaves, that for a while, they may have milk and eggs. But no refrigeration. Especially if Newfoundland cuts the power. That is the subject of another essay though. The main point is that Canada is a fragmentation grenade at this point and Alberta is likely to pull the pin, and most of us who are paying attention or have any love of individual rights are happy about it.

2. The following video was taken hours after the Oct. 7th attack on Israel. It appears to be in Toronto but was in a Canadian city.

This was not in response to an Israeli counter-strike, as one had not happened yet.

This was in celebration of the initial attack and the beginning of what the actual purpose of the attack was.

The tents had already been bought and the signs printed, well before Israel responded to the Hamas attack.

The Hamas attack did not weaken the Israeli military in any meaningful way, It may have killed or kidnapped a few reservists, but clearly the purpose of the attack was to provoke a strong Israeli ,military response, and then weaponize the response with a major global propaganda effort to make Israel into an unacceptable aggressor, delegitimize the state altogether and bring it down with international pressure, or at least obliterate public support and foment a new wave of antisemitism with common purpose with islam.

3. Communism will use one identity to destroy another. Feminism was a line of operation against the family, and the trans movement, a large and effective dialectic, was used to destroy feminism, even while calling itself 4th wave feminism.

Promoting homosexuality in a DEI, previously known as, “Affirmative Action” above and beyond equality was a line of action against heteronormativity and other components of Western Civilization. Not to say that gay people should be persecuted etc. But the use of homosexuality as a weapon was not about ending persecution. There are no rights gay people do not have that the majority of the population also do not have. Marriage was debatable as a right, since they already had the right to marry an opposite sex person, but they won that fight and everyone was fine with it.

The Trans-movement and various offshoots of the original gay pride movement is now in full effect, out to destroy the gay pride movement. It has become the normal. And the communist movement is about a constant attack on whatever the social order is, even when they created it in the first place.

One can debate the final purpose of this mission, if indeed there is one. But whatever it thinks it is doing, it will not end until the rest of us end it, or it achieves a total crushing destruction of all identity, wealth, means of creating wealth, individual rights and anything it an identify as being a component of Western Civilization. There will at some point be an anti-plumbing movement. And if that sounds ludicrous, explain to me how it is any more insane than the global warming effort to end Western productivity.

Sunday in Ottawa:

For those who are still confused, this explainer video on what “Queer” means is really good.

And to drive the point home, and yes, we’ve posted this before but its importance cannot be overstated. This video reveals that the Trans-movement, like so many others, which may have a mustard seed’s worth of truth in it or not, is in fact a dialectic to destroy Western identity, sexual and others.

Chris Dacey has more footage of Ottawa

Edmonton: A ‘Trans-person’ claims “Palestine is the moral compass of the world.”

This is about as true as it is true that this man is a woman in any way.

Back to Ottawa

Chris can be followed here

https://x.com/chrisdacey

Thank you all for checking out this site.

I would like to leave this post with the following reminder about the United Nation’s Moral authority:

United Nations Security Council Resolution 138

United NationsSecurity Council Resolution 138 was adopted on June 23, 1960, after a complaint that the transfer of Adolf Eichmann to Israel from Argentina constituted a violation of the latter’s sovereignty. The Council declared that such acts, if repeated, could endanger international peace and security and requested that Israel make the appropriate reparation in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the rules of international law.

Argentina itself, repeatedly challenged to interpret its demand for “appropriate reparation,” declined to take up the challenge. Dr. Mario Amadeo, Argentina’s delegation chairman, was asked sharply for a “yes or no” answer by Soviet delegation chairman Arkady A. Sobolev in regard to the demand he voiced in the Council the previous day for Eichmann’s return and punishment of those guilty of abducting the Nazi from Argentina. Dr. Amadeo refused flatly to give such an answer, declaring that each delegation is entitled to make its own interpretation of what “appropriate reparation” might mean.[1]

During the debate, Israel told the Security Council that Eichmann had been captured by private individuals acting on their own behalf, that Eichmann had volunteered to come to Israel, and that the Israeli government only heard about it later without learning that he had come from Argentina.[2]

Israel held the view that the matter was beyond the Council’s competence and should instead be settled via direct bilateral negotiations.[3] Israel and Argentina did conduct further negotiations, and on August 3 issued a joint declaration admitting that Argentine sovereignty had been violated, but that the dispute had been resolved.[4]

Resolution 138 was approved by eight votes to none; the People’s Republic of Poland and the Soviet Union abstained. Argentina was present but did not participate in voting, making this resolution one of the last recorded instances of a state abstaining from voting under the nemo iudex in causa sua principle of Article 27(3) of the UN Charter.[5][6][7]

 

 

Billboard Chris is hosting a demonstration at noon Friday the 25th (tomorrow) in Ottawa against Carney’s refusal to stop allowing puberty blockers to children

Tomorrow, Friday, April 25, Billboard Chris, who has made it his life’s mission to stop the surgical and chemical mutilation of children under the dialectical rubric of “trans-rights”, is hosting a march tomorrow at 12:30

Those who would like to attend are asked to bring a sign or grab one there, and not to engage with counter protestors at all, but enjoy a peaceful and meaningful march to protect children from a real danger, as opposed to destroy them while claiming to protect them.