Category Archives: Exposing Leftism

Roman Baber 1st speech to Parliament offers some hope that at least a few politicians actually understand what is happening in Canada

Posted on by

Recently, we posted a video of a speech by a newly elected member of the Canadian parliament who was a doctor and a refugee from communism. It was an important speech which has the potential to open the Overton window on the true nature of many Western governments today.

He had stated that Canada went full communist under Trudeau’s various Covid measures. We would say the same except we would say that Covid was the excuse created in order to go full communist. Covid was the great revolution, dialectically named as, “The Great Reset”.

Thanks to A.P. we were made aware of another speech by another newly elected MP who also came from behind the Iron Curtain and had a lot to say about Canada and the Marxist-Leninist Liberal Party as it is under Carney/Trudeau. This is a little longer but really worth the watch. Especially the two Liberal MPs who attempted to derail him. Guess what the influences and motives of those MPs are.

Two Tweets that have a remarkable synergy: Toronto Mayor, Olivia Chow, and former most popular president of the USA ever, Richard Nixon

Posted on by

First, Richard Nixon discusses the communist effort to destroy Western civilization via popular TV:

And Olivia Chow:

King Charles’ speech to open Parliament

Posted on by

I’m afraid I hadn’t bothered to listen to this. I knew it would be tedious and discouraging, given that Carney, who brought this officious commie WEFfer to Canada and Charles himself are both main drivers of the revolution that is obliterating the most fundamental of human rights. But after filming Bath-Shéba van den Berg last night, speaking publicly on the state of the law, and the Helen Grus hearings as well as many who were charged with “mischief” or had their bank accounts frozen, sometimes for months for being adjacent to those who participated in the Freedom Convoy, I felt I had to. She mentioned in an en-passant remark that Charles had mentioned something about sweeping legislative changes to come in Canada.

Initially the plan was to clip out the best (worst) parts of this speech and post a compilation of them, but after watching, so far about 65% of it, I thought that frankly everyone should probably see it.

It is a mixture of some bizarre kind of leftist jingoism, an attempt to unify Canadians by opposing them all to Donald Trump’s America, excited noises about joining European military efforts, whatever-that-may-mean, also noises about increased military cooperation with the US somehow, a LOT about the removal of gun rights from Canadians, I guess except the ones going to fight in Europe’s wars or something? I dunno. Charles opens with a land claims acknowledgement. The King of England opens his speech with an explanation of how the land the British and French settled, really all belongs to tribes no one can pronounce.

This of course is amusing on the surface. But the likely real purpose of the land claims BS is to disenfranchise Canadians that they have any title to the Canada which they and their ancestors built, and who’s laws reflect their culture and history, such that they have no reasonable grounds to oppose the total replacement of Canadians with Africans and Muslims. And African Muslims. In other words, the land claims BS is a dialectic attack on Canadian identity.

So here it is. I would watch it with far more attention and awareness than you want to. It is every bit as tedious as you imagined it would be. But probably a lot more dangerous.

The truly funny bit though is around the middle, where he fumbles through a book of notes as he reads Trudeau/Carney talking points as if there was a bad smell on the page. I mean it’s right out of the Liberal Campaign book.

This doesn’t make Charles a Liberal party supporter anymore than the CBC is.

Like the CBC and the Liberal party, King Charles is an agent of the revolution. And like the CBC, should the Liberal Party or its Cabinet or its leadership stop serving the interests of the COMINTERN, they will be replaced.

So here it is.

Please leave comments with any observations you may have. This is simply not as trivial as we want it to be.

Anyone know what happened to King Charles the 1st? And why? I wonder if he does.

BBC report on Israeli fires exposes how desperately important it is to familiarize yourself with the book, 1984

Posted on by

This isn’t just a clever headline. This is serious. If you want to survive as a person of reason who operates via empirical evidence, you need to understand the book and concepts within it, 1984 by George Orwell. An Audio book will be in this post as well as a text version of the whole book.

In the book, Winston Smith famously says: “Freedom means the freedom to say 2+2=4”.  In the final chapters, the inner party member who tortures Smith for writing that, explains in detail that truth is what the party says it is, even if and perhaps especially if, the party were to say that O’Brian, the inner party torturer, could levitate in the air for extended periods of time. The truth, is neither objective or subjective, but what the Party says it is, and you must believe it. Not just obey it to avoid discomfort, but actually believe it.

This is very true today. Both with Covid and mRNA injection narrative attacks, but also with the current most vicious attack on reality, the Global Warming narrative.

Watch this carefully crafted BBC propaganda effort on the fires in Israel. As you do, try and recall that for many, many years now, Gazan genocidal Muslims have launched incendiary devices into Israel, mostly in the form of balloons in order to achieve this exact effect. Also, try and recall that as a fire grows, it tends to create the conditions to make it more intense, such as strong winds, and of course, heat.

You have to wait a minute or so before they get to the punch line, which is claiming this is “global Warming” or “Climate Change”. That narrative moves the responsibility for the fires squarely from the people who caused it, to any industrial nation which actually has its sh*t together. Like Israel. This is consistent with the entire victim criminal reversal we see across the West. The rapists and murderers that are released on low bail while awaiting trial, or get light sentences as compared to say, a grandmother convicted of “mischief” for a parking infraction.

We are under heavy narrative bombardment. And in some places, like most of the UK, you can do serious jail time for countering a state narrative with facts. We saw the emergence of that after the Southport attack of a Muslim Jihadi operating for the Islamic State against very young girls at a Taylor Swift dance party. Anyone who dared speak the obvious truth found themselves in prison for long terms. The actual Muslims who did violence and threatened violence in response to the protests, nothing.

But these policies started way, way before that.

We might also remember a Muslim in France murdered an elderly Jewish woman after breaking into her home, robbing her and pushing her out her window, and was found not guilty because he smoked some weed at the time.

Stephen Coughlin often quotes a colleague of his thusly: It’s time to stop seeing what you know, and start knowing what you see”.

This could be put a few different ways. But using this iteration, what we know is, the system does NOT function as we want it to, we think it does, as it always more or less did. It now operated dialectically, meaning that it creates the political outcome it wants, which always grows the power of the state or its partner, Islam, while diminishing the rights of the individual in its various forms such as the Middle Class, or anyone who has a belief that they actually have a right to exist and operate for their own interests.

Please consider watching some part of this each day until you get to the end. This includes the critically important essay on Newspeak at the end of the actual story.

 

Mark Carney’s brilliant dialectical negation of Canadian patriotism

Posted on by

After one of my very regular and long morning conversations with a good friend about the abstracts of all the things which plague the West, we landed on a couple of points of solidity in terms of the attributes of each side of the great conflict. To get to that point, examples were needed.

The poles of the conflict can be said to look like this:

On one side, the ultimate system for human organization that allows for the maximum possibility for development, creativity, fairness as its properly understood in the West, and individual liberties. And that would be the US constitution. Frankly, the first two amendments of the Bill of Rights in some ways is all one needs to understand. The right to speak freely, and the right to defend the first right by opposing with force of arms, a tyrannical state which would remove the first right.

(Not that this should be needed to be added, but freedom of speech only has one purpose. The right to criticize political and religious authority in order to keep its power in check. And that is its only purpose. All other freedoms stem from those. And when you no longer have those rights, you have none. Not even the right to stop the state from castrating and sexually and chemically mutilating your children.)

The other pole is the never ending destruction of all systems of societal organization via the Hegelian dialectic. In its abstract, it is the use of the principles of Hegel however much affected by Marx, to perpetually destroy any and all power structures. Which would perhaps explain why we see anarchists protesting with the communists in the streets of so many cities so often. In reality though, the communists end up creating a state which is God like in its power. The book 1984 explains it rather brilliantly in the chapters after Winston Smith is arrested and taken to the Ministry of Love and eventually to room 101. An easier way though, is talk to anyone you know who is an East European expat that fled during communism. Perhaps every bit as instructive as what they say, is how reticent they will be to talk about it, as their fear of speaking the truth is both a consequence of their ‘lived experience’ as well as their recognition that Canada is in many ways well on the way to being a dialectically operated, totalitarian and oppressive polity.

And this brings me to the example. And this will likely only ring bells with Canadians, and especially in Ontario.

As of the date of the Freedom Convoy in early 2022, symbols were created with a great deal of meaning for many Canadians. The Canadian flag was flown along with symbols of Donald Trump in a non ironic way, because both were being used to demand personal liberty from tyrannical covid measures. Ones which Mark Carney had not just a small part in.

Tucker is quoting an op ed from the Globe and Mail.

Since the Freedom Convoy, people with Canadian flags on their cars or trucks were signalling resistance to the communist state and patriotism to the individualist nation most believe that Canada had been up until 2020. Many vehicles were less subtle about the messaging. The photo below is of a truck that was at the Tamara Lich talk yesterday in Ottawa. But for most, a single or dual Canadian flag on a car or especially a truck, meant loyalty to the right to bodily autonomy and an end to the WEF instructed destruction of the individual.

(Tamara is one of the people now convicted for “Mischief” for her role in the demonstration against mandatory mRNA gene therapy. More on that soon as well as a video of her talk)

And until recently, when patriots in the usual sense saw a vehicle with Canadian flags drive by we knew they were about. There would often be an exchange of waves or perhaps a friendly honk-honk. A genuine subculture was born of samisdat style messaging of those oriented towards a proper individualist and freedom oriented state, and in opposition to Trudeau’s collectivist and destructive one.

Then the old switcheroo happened. The front man for the WEF, Justin Trudeau, was sent back to being a full time wealthy elitist surfer party boy and was craftily replaced with the actual WEF/COMINTERN manager, Mark Carney. It is quite likely that Carney was the man directing the govt’s policies all along with Trudeau acting as one might say, in the same role as Joe Biden fronting for Obama, or whoever directed him.

Then the dialectic negation of the Canadian flag as a symbol for freedom happened.

Which is perhaps a little ironic since the current Canadian flag created and made official by communist PM, Lester Pearson, is itself a dialectic negation of the Red Ensign, which was a meaningful Canadian flag in terms of Canadian identity and history as a nation.

Carney managed to make Donald Trump the enemy for most CBC CTV and Global viewers. He did so by using distortions of Trump’s tariff policies and other propaganda techniques. But the clever thing was taking the rubric of patriotism away from actual patriots, and getting leftists and Liberal Party supporters to hang Canadian flags as a symbol of opposition to Donald trump. Exactly the opposite as the actual patriots, by framing Trump as an enemy of Canadian sovereignty. This from a man whose organization is dedicated to the idea of the total destruction of the nation-state altogether. Trudeau even stated out loud to the NYT that he expected to be the last leader of the nation state of Canada.

Supporters of Carney, or those who at least agree with his position on Trump, began hanging flags in their windows at home, and on vehicles. And now, when one goes by, there is uncertainty. The sense of connection to those sporting the Maple Leaf is gone. The sense of community with people you hadn’t met but you knew had your back is gone.

This is dialectic negation at its most subtle and effective.

And like all dialectics, once you control the symbol, you control the idea it represents. 

And now, once again, the Canadian flag is what it was meant to be when Pearson introduced it in 1965. The business card of the Liberal Party of Canada, and of the constant move to collectivization and an all powerful state.

Carney, China, Coal power and intersectional lines of attack on all aspects of Western identity

Posted on by

1. The point has been made here before that it seems quite likely that Trudeau was the idiot boy-wonder behind policies that were actually moved into place by a COMINTERN cabal quasi-behind the scenes. I say quasi because the WEF has openly bragged about its penetration of the Canadian Cabinet.

YouTube took it down. Here it is again.

Now, the COMINTERN with some sleazy maneuvers has managed to place a sophisticated actor into the role of Canadian PM. One Mark Carney. Think of it like the same process as the US used, when they placed a senile and highly corrupt and corruptible man in the White House while running it from behind in the person of Brack Obama, but in this case, the useful idiot was out front for 9 years using Hanlon’s Razor as his defence for highly sophisticated intersectional attacks on every one of our liberties and aspects of our identities as Canadians and as citizens of a Western republic/democracy, and now the main agent has stepped into place.

2. Mark Carney appears to have a lot of financial interests in US coal mines but is failing to cover miners with Black Lung.

3. Again, I have heard with my own ears as have others I know, Carney saying he actually wants NEGATIVE net zero. This is code for oppression, as it’s simply impossible to do that. Its outside of the realm of any kind of physics or chemistry.

Peterson gets this pretty much totally correct.

4. This one I can’t help but like as this guy has just taken the National Post article we have posted about 25 times in the past couple of years, and condensed out the most stunning and important parts in a Twitter video.

Here is the article again. Please send the link to everyone you know who can vote in Canada or knows someone who can vote in Canada, so long as we are pretending voting makes a difference.

5. And at last, a NEW National Post article on Carney’s climate policy.

For those that don’t get this, the Climate thing is an intersectional attack against Western and only Western industry and the middle class. For an explanation of that, see the Stephen Coughlin video below.

Terry Newman: Mark Carney’s climate obsessions will put Trudeau to shame

Don’t trust his pledge to turn Canada into an energy superpower

For all of Carney’s supposed superior knowledge of the world and markets, the art of provincial negotiations and incentives for private investment in natural resources appears to have already escaped his grasp. There’s evidence to suggest this is because, at heart, Carney is likely to be a fully fledged ESG prime minister (ESG being short for environmental, social, and governance principles being imposed on business).

In his speech after winning the Liberal leadership, Carney said he had a plan: “A plan, a plan, a plan … that makes us an energy superpower in both clean and conventional energy … a plan that creates one Canadian economy, not 13, because in Canada, we are stronger when we are united.”

Unfortunately, everything Carney’s said and done up until this point suggests not only that he’d fail to unite Canadian provinces to create this energy super-economy, but that’s he’s not actually interested in doing so in the first place.

The Liberal party may have a new face, but Carney’s insistence on keeping an emissions cap and industrial carbon tax in place — both products of Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government — doesn’t invoke much confidence in his energy superpower plan.

We view articles like the above as colour commentary. Like listening to someone describe the action on the field at a sporting event with maybe some light background on his views of the players or the refs but little to no actual information about the nature of the game at the strategic level.

The strategic level looks like this:

Politicians and other communist revolutionary actors create fictional narratives which have as their focus, a component of Western civilization and the identity of all who live in it which must be destroyed. These are called “Intersectional lines of attack”. The Global Warming thing is so obviously an attack on Western industry it should feel embarrassing to explain it out loud. But most still buy into it, even though China is not just immune from criticism for not living up to the various low carbon policies, but is actively building 5000 coal powered power production facilities a year, and they buy the coal from people like Mark Carney. Then there is the actual science which doesn’t support the Global warming from man-made CO2 claims whatsoever. Then there are the people who claim CO2 from engine exhaust is an existential threat to the entire planet, then take separate jumbo jets from Washington to LA for an afternoon. Michelle to go shopping, and Barack for a meeting. Then take separate jets to go home. Of course, Trudeau and Carney are no different.

If it was an existential threat you would see some evidence of it in their behaviour. The way they would say, jump out of the way of an oncoming truck. That is how you know they believe the truck is real, and it could really hurt them. Because they jump out of the way. (take any veiled reference you want to the Freedom Convoy and it’s threat to Trudeau’s power during covid you want, although I didn’t pick that example for that reason)

Below is a recentish interview with Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin on the intersectional lines of attack which is used to crush so many aspects of our identity. Think “Trans-affirming care” for the state’s ‘right’ to convince a child it is somehow in the wrong body, and needs to be surgically and chemically sterilized and mutilated to feel comfortable with itself. Ok then. Once you start to see it, examples are numerous and obvious.

290M$ Suit against freedom convoy by Zexi Li approved to go ahead by Ontario Appeals court

Posted on by

First the story, then a documentary made by some rather unusually aware and intelligent people who saw all this coming right from the start, and who show exactly who these actors are, and what motivates them. As one might expect, the suit is just an intersectional attack against any attempt at effective or meaningful counter-revolutionary actions. And what nation or agency is behind the suit and the ‘hearings’ is pretty easy to figure out if anyone has paid attention to numerous CSIS pleas over the past 20 years both in MSM and to Parliament about control of our government by foreign agents.

The Ontario Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of advancing a $290 million lawsuit targeting Freedom Convoy participants

The Ontario Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal from defendants in a class action lawsuit tied to the 2022 Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa. The decision, released on March 6, 2025, upholds a lower court’s rejection of a motion to dismiss the case under Ontario’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) legislation. This allows the lawsuit to proceed to its next phase, potentially certification as a class action.

The lawsuit stems from the Freedom Convoy protest, which began on January 28, 2022, and lasted about three weeks in downtown Ottawa. Truckers and supporters gathered to oppose COVID-19 public health measures, parking trucks on public streets and causing frequent horn honking and engine idling, according to reports. The plaintiffs claim this disrupted residents, businesses, and employees in the area. Zexi Li, an Ottawa resident, filed the initial claim on February 4, 2022, which later expanded to include Happy Goat Coffee Company, 7983794 Canada Inc. (operating as Union: Local 613), and Geoffrey Devaney, representing affected residents, businesses, and employees.

Named defendants include individuals such as Chris Barber, Tamara Lich, and Patrick King, identified by the plaintiffs as key organizers, along with other participants, truckers, and donors accused of supporting the protest. The plaintiffs seek $290 million in damages for private and public nuisance, including $60 million for general damages, $70 million for business losses, $150 million for lost wages, and $10 million in punitive damages.

Please click through to read the rest at the Canadian Independent.

And now, the bogus “unbiased” “hearings” held by pretty badly hidden communist agents such as various government unions which set out to defame the freedom movement during lockdowns and vaxx mandates.

If you have not watched this documentary before, it is highly recommended that you do so, as the evidence of who these people are, their motivations and tactics and intentions are made clear as a bright summer day.

[It’s recommended that you click the little gear bottom right of the play window once it starts playing, and dial it up to full quality to be able to read some of the inserts as it goes along easily]

At this point one might start to understand that whatever you see when you pull back the curtain, is probably another curtain.

Posted on by

It looks like Frank Zappa may have understated his case.

Finding examples of the multi-curtain theatre works is a lot easier than I thought it would be. But to illustrate the point, let’s start with a prediction based on nothing but the hopefully quotable statement in the title.

We are being regularly told about the stunning abuses of public money in the US by DOGE. Certainly the same thing is true across all COMINTERN countries such as Canada, the UK, Germany, the EU in general, the UN and so on. To make up a representative example, DOGE might reveal that they have discovered two hundred and sixty million dollars earmarked to teach gay turtles how to put on a version of Hamlet as a trans person in Bububu Tanzania . And that fictional example is really a pretty mild exaggeration of the DOGE headlines.

With zero data points to support the following statement at this point in writing, and going purely on the model in the title, itself informed by a couple of decades, actually a lot more than a couple of decades of observing how nascent communist governments and polities operate, the following hypothesis is presented:

None or next to none of that money was ever sent to those ‘charities’. In fact they may not exist at all.

Or if they do, they were created as a beard for which to pretend to send money. In all likelihood, the idea was to get people outraged about the nature of the recipients of the high amounts of cash and not look any farther. In fact, the money was likely used to find the invasion of Western nations by millions of people from Africa, especially the Islamic Maghreb and Islamic nations who are hostile to Jewish and Christian culture, and Greco-Roman Civilization, and intend to work triple shifts to bring it down. In fact, paid to bring it down.

Documents have been floating around Twitter showing that illegal migrants, and I mean illegal in a proper way, as opposed to simply redefining what constitutes an immigrant by rewriting the definition of an invader as a “migrant” or “Asylum seeker”, are being given very large sums of money to get here, and to settle in Western nations. They do not seem to have to work, and they do seem to live a pretty decent lifestyle and drive cars. Also both Canada and the US admitted that the illegals crossing the borders did not have to take the mRNA injections, like all the citizens of Western nations did. One can fairly safely assume the same for the UK, Germany and the rest of Western Europe.

This money was clearly printed for this purpose. But it had to be disguised as it might be too easy to spot the strategy if the budget read ‘3 trillion dollars to house and feed illegal Muslim migrants to the West”.

So what we see here is one arm of the Cloward Piven Strategy being synergistic with another.

As you may recall, Cloward-Piven has three main stratagems for making the US (and any other proper republic_ communist. 1. Print so much money it causes predictable problems like inflation and lack of confidence in the currency. 2. Open borders and flood the nation(s) with millions of people hostile to the local people and culture. 3. Grow the civil service massively with the main purpose being to oppress the actual cultural and legal citizens of that nation.

How that might look could be hiring 80,000 IRS agents and arming them for some reason.

It is expected that people will stop looking when they see the outrage-bait in the names of the places the money is alleged to go to. Maybe someone has flown over to Ireland and looked at the books of such projects as a DEI Musical in Ireland, or a Trans Gender opera in Columbia, etc. etc.

Here is a Tweet which actually speaks directly to the use of USAID money for the purpose of funding the invasion and destruction of Ireland. Interesting that they are this forthcoming on the matter. But it doesn’t address the likely reallocation of funds for the absurd and ‘woke’ projects which we think is taking place for this purpose. And as I search for the insane projects, data points that support the  hypothesis are actually appearing now.

There is a second axiom which one may wish to add to any analytical processes they use to understand what is actually going on when listening to the dialectical explanation from nearly all media to one degree or another. And that is that:

whenever someone tells you that a thing cannot happen because the law says, and rules are, and the procedure works like this…

they are either people with poor observational skills or they are trying to live in a safe past where there was predictability based on the rules a nation used as the central doctrine of its law and culture. This site predicted 2 years ago that Mark Carney would be the PM without getting elected to Parliament, or by any of the normal means a person becomes PM. Now at this point some people will take a post hoc view of this and explain how this happened such that it is still procedurally normal somehow. But the same can be said of all the unprecedented and tyrannical acts that have happened in Canada for decades now albeit far less subtly since Trudeau became the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Parliament of Canada, or if you prefer, General Secretary of the Workers’ Party of Canada”.

Before each new Tyrannical measure during Covid, anyone who dared suggest what the Trudopian state would do next was called a conspiracy nut. Then after he enacted the exactly predicted measure, the same people would claim it was lawful and a needed policy.

The basis of this second axion was the reversing of process to result.

In a “democracy” or real republic, processes and procedures are established in law such that the outcome maintains the public’s rights and the state’s powers remain limited. And perhaps more importantly, that the procedures determine the truth of a matter to the best of their ability and if truth cannot be established, the matter is dropped as in the case of a criminal court. But in a communist polity, institutions operate dialectically. The process to outcome is reversed. The state decides what outcome they want, and then adjust the process to give that result. And with that understanding, no pouring over Canadian law books or history of politics in Canada was needed to know Carney would become the Supreme Leader with little to no scrutiny by the media, or any typically normal method of getting to that position. The Prorogation of Parliament for the purpose of installing Carney was clearly not procedure and John Carpay made an excellent case that it was in fact illegal. And he is likely right. But Canada no longer operates that way. As we said, the method/procedure to outcome, or Socratic Aristotelian and even Kung Fu Tze (Confusion) paradigm has been reversed.

So moving to at least what may be potential examples, we have two cognitive tools with which to arrive at a more likely prediction for all things political, (which increasingly is all things), the first is that behind every curtain is another curtain, the first revealing something the public will likely be content with as sufficiently outrageous to not pull back the second, and that the method of Socratic civilization, to establish rational processes for truthful and beneficial outcomes has been reversed , such that the outcomes are pre determined and the processes to arrive at them are adjusted before the fact, to give the desired outcome for a communist state. Perhaps an evil version of a posteriori thought, or an ab initio manipulation. It is Evil because the outcomes are always destructive to the public and civilization. Especially at the level of rights.

1. Brian Lilley. The curtain hides another curtain

2. CBC in on the Carney con. This is an example of both axioms. Carney pretends to remove the carbon tax when really he is moving it to another level of the producer to consumer chain, which will likely lead to higher taxes but not called a Carbon tax. It will also have tax on the tax. Carney has said to a closed group of people in Ottawa’s affluent Rockcliffe Park in a talk he gave last fall, that he intended to past Net Zero to Negative Net Zero. I’ll let other people work on what that means.

The second axiom is where he signed an OIC to remove the tax, but that isn’t, as the unobservant are saying, how an OIC is done. Carney is replicating the American system of executive orders which does not exist in the Canadian system, at least de jure. So his critics are saying that this order in council is invalid because he is using powers he doesn’t have.

We would argue that he is making powers up, and they will be enforced, so he does have them. And once it is established that he has executive powers like the US president, and no one squawks too much because we all want the carbon tax to go, his next batch will be profoundly bad for Canadians, and there will be no way to stop them, because he did one, and everyone accepts then that he can. And of course, the police and RCMP do what they are told. So yeah. he signs the cheques so to speak, so he can take these powers for himself as he sees fit. Read the images below the CBC video.

3. Here is a near perfect example of a guy who is paradigmatically locked to a system that was dismantled in all but name many years ago now. In a very real way, we could call this man controlled opposition, even if he is fully committed to our side of the ideological issues. His inability to see what is actually happening based on how he thinks things are supposed to work, makes him an agent of the enemy.

The National Post offers this article which has a brief nod to how unusual this Order in Council is, but not detailing that it is not Canadian procedure, and goes on to explain that the motive is probably to take the main sail out of Piere Poilievre’s campaign, mostly about removing the Carbon tax. But it does explain how Carney is doing with the Carbon tax what a three card monty dealer does with the queen. Maybe that’s how he got his last name.

4. The New York Times has now moved to showing us the second curtain on Covid measures.

Yet in 2020, when people started speculating that a laboratory accident might have been the spark that started the Covid-19 pandemic, they were treated like kooks and cranks. Many public health officials and prominent scientists dismissed the idea as a conspiracy theory, insisting that the virus had emerged from animals in a seafood market in Wuhan, China. And when a nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance lost a grant because it was planning to conduct risky research into bat viruses with the Wuhan Institute of Virology — research that, if conducted with lax safety standards, could have resulted in a dangerous pathogen leaking out into the world — no fewer than 77 Nobel laureates and 31 scientific societies lined up to defend the organization.

So, the Wuhan research was totally safe and the pandemic was definitely caused by natural transmission: It certainly seemed like consensus.

We have since learned, however, that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story. And as for that Wuhan laboratory’s research, the details that have since emerged show that safety precautions may have been terrifyingly lax.

The article goes to great pains to show how the lab leak theory was suppressed, although fails to mention the NYT role in that suppression. But near the bottom you get to the illusion painted on the outside of the second curtain. The real problem is Trump, RFK Jr. and his “anti-vaccine” stances that they claim, killed a child with measles. At best this article is what chess players would call a gambit. They are sacrificing a Knight to try and get at the King.

POSTSCRIPT:

Those familiar with the machinations Trudeau used to install Mark Carney to the levers of power in Canada may wish to look at this relatively recent video of JT somewhat in this light of this article.

 

Segment of Today’s Charlie Kirk broadcast on the massive social security fraud

Posted on by

Gotta say, Charlie Kirk is one of my favourites of the new media people. Like Trump, he defies physics in how much energy he has and what a single person can accomplish.

In today’s broadcast, which should be available here in its entirety, he took on the social security scam. Here is a few minutes from the start of the show.

Some of his questions in this segment it seems to me, could be answered in another one of his broadcasts from several months ago. It is very short, and very important.

For anyone who might think this is a “conspiracy theory” or that these people aren’t real or had no real influence, the interviews below do a deep and referenced dive into Cloward Piven.

Jim Simpson:

Trevor Loudon:

More on the Cloward Piven strategy and a list of winners of the Cloward Piven award.

James Simpson again

Searching RAIR Foundation for Trevor Loudon will yield one or two more excellent exposes of these two communists.

JD Vance: Every word of this is gold

Posted on by

In case anyone feels the need to justify patriotism to the idea of Canada 51st, this is it. When he is talking about Europe, he may as well be talking about Canada.

H/T Oz-Rita

Dutch Maj. General takes the position that we live in an imposed pseudo-reality created by the state and enforced by the media

Posted on by

Regulars of this site may recognize the concepts in this video and the companion RAIR article as being the message of Maj, (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin for many years now. Even so, it is amazing to see this understanding coming from someone as deep in the military establishment as this Maj. General in the Dutch army.

A few more data points on Mark Carney, and an excellent explanation of what he is, and who he serves

Posted on by

The shortest possible chess game is 4 moves long and is called, “The Fools Mate”.

Using the older nomenclature of chess, it reads like this:

  • White: Pawn to King’s Bishop 4 (f2–f3)
  • Black: King’s Pawn to King’s 4 (e7–e5)
  • White: Pawn to King’s Knight 4 (g2–g4)
  • Black: Queen to King’s Rook 5 (Qd8–h4 Checkmate)

Carney has made his first move as Black by declaring himself in the running for the PMO, a surprise to no one, in that he is poised for mate in his next move to take out the king and replace him. It helps of course that both sides of the game are being played by the same organization and agendas, and so they wanted to make the game as short as possible. White normally would never make that opening move unless he wants to lose fast and get out to the pubs.

So it’s becoming more important that people know who he is and what he intends. And fortunately, that information is easy to obtain. JohnnyU posted a video under the Diana West interview which is profoundly important and relevant to that interview, but belongs here at least as much because, well as they say, an Oz. of prevention is equal to a pound of cure. Mind you, one has to believe that prevention or cure is even possible at this stage.

But in case elections still reflect votes. here goes a few data points on The new emperor, Mark Carney. If you watch these videos, please make sure to watch the video at the bottom.

Related: Joe Rogan on Canada now after years of Le Petit Dauphin Trudeau. Carney will actually push more of the same policies.

Sadly. his last sentence is meaningless. Carney will take over. And I think readers of this site know where he will take the remnants of Canada.

Carney wants to increase the Carbon Tax

Meet the new boss – same as the old boss

WATCH: Carney henchmen remove Western Standard reporter from Liberal leadership event in Edmonton

And here is a half hour of 20 20 vision with Rosa Koire:

 

 

Interview with James Simpson on his new book, Manufactured Crisis, explaining and exposing communism in the USA

Posted on by

I had the chance to do an interview with author and expert on communism, James Simpson a little while ago. He does a really nice, moderately paced explanation of why we are here in a very practical manner.

Some of his reveals alone make it worth the trip. Obama’s connection to Coward Piven, and the fact, (and this is something I feel embarrassed that I did not work out on the telos of the event alone) the Sub Prime Mortgage catastrophe was engineered like Covid, the Vaxx, and so many other leftist attack strategies.

Please feel free to leave a comment here or at RAIR, which has a summary of the interview here.