Interview with James Simpson on his new book, Manufactured Crisis, explaining and exposing communism in the USA

Posted on by

I had the chance to do an interview with author and expert on communism, James Simpson a little while ago. He does a really nice, moderately paced explanation of why we are here in a very practical manner.

Some of his reveals alone make it worth the trip. Obama’s connection to Coward Piven, and the fact, (and this is something I feel embarrassed that I did not work out on the telos of the event alone) the Sub Prime Mortgage catastrophe was engineered like Covid, the Vaxx, and so many other leftist attack strategies.

Please feel free to leave a comment here or at RAIR, which has a summary of the interview here.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

4 Replies to “Interview with James Simpson on his new book, Manufactured Crisis, explaining and exposing communism in the USA”

  1. Explains so much.

    Firstly, the Cloward and Piven subversion legacy remains largely in the margins when it should be front and center. It also explains Soros, who took what he learned from them, obviously, and ran. We need not bestow genius to Soros where it doesn’t apply. Financial, yes, but societal destruction as designed by C &P was likely the blueprint for him and for so many others.

    I called the lending of money to unqualified mortgage seekers predatory lending. I used this term one day while leaving my bank back in 2006. My brother passed me on the sidewalk outside. I said what are you doing here? This isn’t your bank.

    I followed him back in. He had an appointment with a loans officer. While he was in the office I said to another bank employee, “If you give my brother a loan because we share the same last name, and you think I will back it, I won’t. He isn’t qualified. That’s predatory lending!”

    Like I say, I had never heard this term until I made it up on the spot. Then I started to hear it everywhere.

    But I was wrong. The banks were predators, yes, but they were only enabled by the Federal government, or in Canada the Bank of Canada, because here they were replicating the Greenspan Put, in a way. This basically meant that if great losses or insolvency was ever to threaten major commercial banks, the government would rescue them. Because of this implied promise the banks (including the investment banks such as Goldman Sachs) made massive bets. Private-sector losses became public (taxpayer) burden. Lehman brothers was just a token sacrifice to assuage public anger and appearances of gross malfeasance.

    Private-sector losses turned public burden by large, politically-connected banks back in 2008 were but a dress rehearsal for what we face today.

    The Great Recession of ’08 has laid the groundwork for the Great Taking. No one went to jail for ’08, and government debt was not reduced. In fact, debt and corruption have gone up exponentially.

    If the possibility exists that our institutions are run by wolves in sheep’s suits, then we can suspect so is monetary policy. If monetary policy is run by wolves we can expect debt to be maximized in the service of maximum societal destruction.

    This document has been vetted seven ways to Sunday. It explains the next, and final level of destruction afoot. Here is a video version:

    duck://player/dk3AVceraTI

  3. I’m grateful for the link to your article. (Rumble allergy.)

    Richard Andrew Cloward and his wife Frances Fox Piven were sociologists at Columbia. Harvard and Columbia raced to the bottom, then kept digging on their way to China. But CHY-na itself gave them their biggest boost – set up shop on their very own campuses.