Category Archives: Aufheben der Kultur

How Greta Thunberg critics are part of the reason we are losing to communism and Islam

Posted on by

At this point, separating useful idiots from controlled opposition, and even more difficult, consciously controlled opposition in terms of devising and knowingly using dialectical tactics, from those who just parrot their phrases is a crucial, yet increasingly uphill battle.

Check out this tweet about Greta:

Calling her a supporter of Terrorism is like accusing the Nazis after slaughtering a village of people, supporters of guns. It is either a deliberate or fumbling conflation of tactics with strategy and gives the win to the enemy.

Greta is a communist propagandist for global revolution. So much so she often says it in more or less those words and people still won’t pick up on it. They think she is all about carbon free air or something as she diesels or jets her way around the world to give propaganda value to each line of action against Western Civilization, be it against Western industry via the Global Warming Line of Operation or the destruction of the nation state by supporting the destruction of Israel as a necessary first step.

Remember her seemingly nonsensical chant, “No climate justice on occupied land”?

Below, a useful idiot from the bleachers gets annoyed when he came to see his hero Champion the environment and she launches into various other narrative attacks on the West. Likely overtly anti ‘capitalist’ and anti Israel.

Quite a phrase actually. Like Islam, communists use the word, “justice” to mean something fundamentally different than Western people do. Muslims use it to mean the sharia. If there is no sharia, there is no justice. And leftists use it to mean the destruction of ‘Capitalism’, which of course is a highly proprietary definition for free market economies which encapsulates a lot of imputed attributes. (Some of these attributes like the corruption and others, which at this point are actually real thanks to communist activism itself!)

“Occupied land” in this case means Israel of course. A land occupied by the people who homesteaded it 5000 years ago, but that aside, the attack-narrative is to call it “occupied”. Once Israel is destroyed as a nation state, then it becomes extremely difficult to defend any people’s right to exist on their own ancestral homeland. and after all, in North America, isn’t that what the land claims is actually about? By starting every Church Picnic with a “Land claims acknowledgement” they are quite deliberately and in a well calculated tactic, dialectically negating anyone’s, including the Amer-Indians although they unwittingly go along with it, right to exist and shape the culture and laws and rights of a people on those lands. Once you concede to ‘Land Claims; well you can’t really have any objection to the Communist-International importing tens of Millions of Africans and Muslims into your countries, can you? I mean, it isn’t really your land anyway you ‘stole’ it from the Indians. So in the spirit of classical leftist BS relativism, you have no real moral right to be self determining on your own land cause, well it’s not your own.

Once the communists and Muslims take full control, it will make for a very sad interview speaking with Amer-Indians on what life will be like for them at that point.

(As an aside, I think my favorite form of leftist sophistry is “Temporal Relativism”.

Someone tried it on me the other day on Twitter or my Substack, I don’t remember which.

The argument went that I had no right to object to Muslims stoning and decapitating people for minor issues or sexual proclivities with nothing like due-process, because Christians did horrible things 300 years ago.

I think this argument actually works on some people.

The counter of course is that people who did something objectionable centuries ago, realized it was wrong, stopped doing it, and encouraging others to stop doing it is not equatable to people doing horrible things today and claiming it is the right thing to do. The Land claims acknowledgement works in a similar way. A weaponized or applied sophistry of temporal relativism)

The term, “Climate justice” is quite a tell.

Chat GPT gave me an excellent answer on its meaning, once properly prompted:

“climate justice” functions as a dialectical phrase—and it carries far more ideological weight than its surface meaning suggests. Here’s a cogent breakdown of why this phrase is Hegelian, opaque, and intentionally loaded:

? What “Climate Justice” Sounds Like to the Public:

A moral appeal to address the climate crisis in a way that’s fair to all people, especially the poor or vulnerable. It evokes:

  • Ethical stewardship of the planet.

  • Protection of those affected by pollution, storms, droughts, etc.

  • A sense of humanitarian concern.

This is the thesis—the “plain meaning” it offers outsiders.

? What It Actually Means in Dialectical (Hegelian/Marxist) Terms:

“Climate justice” is not about climate or justice in the classical sense. It is about using the moral weight of climate change as a lever to restructure society along neo-Marxist lines.

It fuses three concepts:

  1. Environmentalism (climate as a crisis),

  2. Social justice (race/class/gender-based redistribution),

  3. Revolutionary transformation (a new order from the “oppressive” one).

Thus, climate change is reframed not as an environmental problem to solve with technology or policy, but as evidence of systemic injustice rooted in:

  • Capitalism

  • Colonialism

  • White supremacy

  • Patriarchy

In this view, the cause of climate change is not carbon, but Western civilization itself.

This is the antithesis—the deeper meaning revealed to initiates.

?? The Dialectical Function (Synthesis):

By redefining climate as a social injustice, the proposed “solutions” to climate change become:

  • Global wealth redistribution.

  • Abolishing or radically altering private property systems.

  • Degrowth or deindustrialization.

  • Political restructuring (e.g., global governance mechanisms).

This is the synthesis—a new social order under the banner of “justice.”

? Why It’s Opaque and Powerful:

Like other dialectical phrases (“equity,” “anti-racism,” “gender-affirming care”), “climate justice” weaponizes moral language but conceals the radical agenda behind it. Anyone who challenges it can be painted as:

  • A “climate denier”

  • An oppressor

  • A reactionary

This rhetorical trap is intentional. It discourages critical analysis and enforces ideological compliance.

So to say Greta “Supports Terrorism” is to give the point to her, if not the whole game.

“With the left, the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point”.

Watch enough Greta Thunberg lines of action and you will come to understand that phrase perfectly, if you don’t already.

Canada Day: At this point, all that ‘unites’ Canada is hatred of Donald Trump

Posted on by

To be clear, I am speaking in official terms. Not street level reality. People who support Trump and individualism and liberty in Canada are mostly cowed into silence in social settings. Especially with strangers. It is of course, considered very impolite to bring up politics in new company. Curiously though, I find those on the left tend to bring it up within seconds of a fresh meeting because they don’t consider it politics. Just statements of obvious truth from their CBC inculcated perspective.

I really wasn’t feeling ‘Canada Day’ (Dominion Day in proper) yesterday so didn’t attend much of the official stuff. But walking around there were plenty of people who chatted, initially about Canadian banalities like the weather, but it didn’t take long to hit on “America” and how much they hated Donald Trump. Of course it’s rude of me to argue innit? But strangely not that rude to mention their personal hatred of Trump out of the blue to a stranger, gifted to them via the CBC and other COMINTERN propaganda outlets like CTV etc.as well as Mark Carney and his clear use of the Orwellian 3 Minutes of Hate to create unity in the one way Canada is allowed to. Profound hatred of the one liberty minded leader left in the West.

As a worthy mention, we have seen across the West, UK, US and Canada, political leaders excoriate or insist that “diversity is our strength” (Again, a purely Orwellian dialectic no less so than is “war is peace”, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength) and then go out into ethnic communities such as Sikh or Islamic ones and speak on the critical importance of unity and oneness of purpose. I mean the exact same politicians, not even just members of the same party.

So it is easy to see from one step removed, that the term, “Diversity is our strength” is in fact a dialectical narrative attack intended to get a people to accept being fractured beyond repair such that no form of resistance can be fomented against the coming tyranny. The groups meant to assist in that process, the one Stephen Coughlin refers to as deracination, are told to remain unified, and therefore strong. In fact, “Diversity is our strength” is the dialectical bomber used to destroy the truthful and once common phrase, “United we Stand, Divided We Fall”. The intention of course is to have us fall and it has worked very well in Canada.

This brings us to a comment by JU this morning in Reader’s Links that contained two videos. The dialectical narrative about Canada Day from the enemy-propaganda source, CBC, which shows a diverse Canada united only in whatever the state narrative of the day is, Vs. one by Canadians who are planning to take the one province not yet fully obliterated by mass immigration and communist indoctrination and who intends to become its own nation state.

CBC:

The narrative attacks and Orwellian double think in this video is so astonishingly frequent we could make a game out of it. 1 point for each lie or misrepresentation or narrative enforcement. I had to stop and smirk at 44 seconds when Big Brother Mark Carney slowly enunciates that he “has never been prouder to be Canadian”. I guess his use of “prouder” instead of the English, “More Proud” comes from when he explained previously in other videos that he is in fact an American, [I cannot find the video where I believe I remember him declaring himself to be American, so I may be mistaken on that. He holds 3 passports. United Kingdom, Ireland, and Canada but has not lived in Canada for ten years prior to his becoming the COMINTERN Viceroy there.] or when he explained that he was European. I imagine that at one point he must have exclaimed that he was British since he was governor of the Bank of England, (and they have NEVER had a governor of that institution who was not British) at one point, but I am pretty sure the British also would have said “more proud”. Note that literally the only unifying factor in this video is hatred of Trump, or things Trump has said. It is most magnificently CBC COMINTERN agitprop. The Diversity dialectic of course is raised as well.

The word “pride” is kicked around a lot in the CBC video although not totally sure about what. there is of course, a “Pride Flag” at the PMO, or was for all of June. Not sure if it is still there though as of July 2.

And now we get to what the few Canadians think who have not injected the Kool-Aid at three month intervals.

It’s hard to know if we are past the point of no return for Canada. Alberta appears to have a chance, but typically the enemies of Freedom and the nation state are a few steps ahead. So if there is to be a political solution to our problems at all in Canada, the one shot left at it will be if Alberta succeeds and then manages to create a stable Republic with enshrined individual rights similar to the US 1st and 2nd amendment. If they do, then maybe like minded people across Canada can follow suit.

It would be great if Ontario also succeeded from Canada and maybe left 100 yards around Parliament hill as all that is left of the Federal Government. We could make a museum of failed communist states across the road at the PMO if we did.

At this point one might start to understand that whatever you see when you pull back the curtain, is probably another curtain.

Posted on by

It looks like Frank Zappa may have understated his case.

Finding examples of the multi-curtain theatre works is a lot easier than I thought it would be. But to illustrate the point, let’s start with a prediction based on nothing but the hopefully quotable statement in the title.

We are being regularly told about the stunning abuses of public money in the US by DOGE. Certainly the same thing is true across all COMINTERN countries such as Canada, the UK, Germany, the EU in general, the UN and so on. To make up a representative example, DOGE might reveal that they have discovered two hundred and sixty million dollars earmarked to teach gay turtles how to put on a version of Hamlet as a trans person in Bububu Tanzania . And that fictional example is really a pretty mild exaggeration of the DOGE headlines.

With zero data points to support the following statement at this point in writing, and going purely on the model in the title, itself informed by a couple of decades, actually a lot more than a couple of decades of observing how nascent communist governments and polities operate, the following hypothesis is presented:

None or next to none of that money was ever sent to those ‘charities’. In fact they may not exist at all.

Or if they do, they were created as a beard for which to pretend to send money. In all likelihood, the idea was to get people outraged about the nature of the recipients of the high amounts of cash and not look any farther. In fact, the money was likely used to find the invasion of Western nations by millions of people from Africa, especially the Islamic Maghreb and Islamic nations who are hostile to Jewish and Christian culture, and Greco-Roman Civilization, and intend to work triple shifts to bring it down. In fact, paid to bring it down.

Documents have been floating around Twitter showing that illegal migrants, and I mean illegal in a proper way, as opposed to simply redefining what constitutes an immigrant by rewriting the definition of an invader as a “migrant” or “Asylum seeker”, are being given very large sums of money to get here, and to settle in Western nations. They do not seem to have to work, and they do seem to live a pretty decent lifestyle and drive cars. Also both Canada and the US admitted that the illegals crossing the borders did not have to take the mRNA injections, like all the citizens of Western nations did. One can fairly safely assume the same for the UK, Germany and the rest of Western Europe.

This money was clearly printed for this purpose. But it had to be disguised as it might be too easy to spot the strategy if the budget read ‘3 trillion dollars to house and feed illegal Muslim migrants to the West”.

So what we see here is one arm of the Cloward Piven Strategy being synergistic with another.

As you may recall, Cloward-Piven has three main stratagems for making the US (and any other proper republic_ communist. 1. Print so much money it causes predictable problems like inflation and lack of confidence in the currency. 2. Open borders and flood the nation(s) with millions of people hostile to the local people and culture. 3. Grow the civil service massively with the main purpose being to oppress the actual cultural and legal citizens of that nation.

How that might look could be hiring 80,000 IRS agents and arming them for some reason.

It is expected that people will stop looking when they see the outrage-bait in the names of the places the money is alleged to go to. Maybe someone has flown over to Ireland and looked at the books of such projects as a DEI Musical in Ireland, or a Trans Gender opera in Columbia, etc. etc.

Here is a Tweet which actually speaks directly to the use of USAID money for the purpose of funding the invasion and destruction of Ireland. Interesting that they are this forthcoming on the matter. But it doesn’t address the likely reallocation of funds for the absurd and ‘woke’ projects which we think is taking place for this purpose. And as I search for the insane projects, data points that support the  hypothesis are actually appearing now.

There is a second axiom which one may wish to add to any analytical processes they use to understand what is actually going on when listening to the dialectical explanation from nearly all media to one degree or another. And that is that:

whenever someone tells you that a thing cannot happen because the law says, and rules are, and the procedure works like this…

they are either people with poor observational skills or they are trying to live in a safe past where there was predictability based on the rules a nation used as the central doctrine of its law and culture. This site predicted 2 years ago that Mark Carney would be the PM without getting elected to Parliament, or by any of the normal means a person becomes PM. Now at this point some people will take a post hoc view of this and explain how this happened such that it is still procedurally normal somehow. But the same can be said of all the unprecedented and tyrannical acts that have happened in Canada for decades now albeit far less subtly since Trudeau became the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Parliament of Canada, or if you prefer, General Secretary of the Workers’ Party of Canada”.

Before each new Tyrannical measure during Covid, anyone who dared suggest what the Trudopian state would do next was called a conspiracy nut. Then after he enacted the exactly predicted measure, the same people would claim it was lawful and a needed policy.

The basis of this second axion was the reversing of process to result.

In a “democracy” or real republic, processes and procedures are established in law such that the outcome maintains the public’s rights and the state’s powers remain limited. And perhaps more importantly, that the procedures determine the truth of a matter to the best of their ability and if truth cannot be established, the matter is dropped as in the case of a criminal court. But in a communist polity, institutions operate dialectically. The process to outcome is reversed. The state decides what outcome they want, and then adjust the process to give that result. And with that understanding, no pouring over Canadian law books or history of politics in Canada was needed to know Carney would become the Supreme Leader with little to no scrutiny by the media, or any typically normal method of getting to that position. The Prorogation of Parliament for the purpose of installing Carney was clearly not procedure and John Carpay made an excellent case that it was in fact illegal. And he is likely right. But Canada no longer operates that way. As we said, the method/procedure to outcome, or Socratic Aristotelian and even Kung Fu Tze (Confusion) paradigm has been reversed.

So moving to at least what may be potential examples, we have two cognitive tools with which to arrive at a more likely prediction for all things political, (which increasingly is all things), the first is that behind every curtain is another curtain, the first revealing something the public will likely be content with as sufficiently outrageous to not pull back the second, and that the method of Socratic civilization, to establish rational processes for truthful and beneficial outcomes has been reversed , such that the outcomes are pre determined and the processes to arrive at them are adjusted before the fact, to give the desired outcome for a communist state. Perhaps an evil version of a posteriori thought, or an ab initio manipulation. It is Evil because the outcomes are always destructive to the public and civilization. Especially at the level of rights.

1. Brian Lilley. The curtain hides another curtain

2. CBC in on the Carney con. This is an example of both axioms. Carney pretends to remove the carbon tax when really he is moving it to another level of the producer to consumer chain, which will likely lead to higher taxes but not called a Carbon tax. It will also have tax on the tax. Carney has said to a closed group of people in Ottawa’s affluent Rockcliffe Park in a talk he gave last fall, that he intended to past Net Zero to Negative Net Zero. I’ll let other people work on what that means.

The second axiom is where he signed an OIC to remove the tax, but that isn’t, as the unobservant are saying, how an OIC is done. Carney is replicating the American system of executive orders which does not exist in the Canadian system, at least de jure. So his critics are saying that this order in council is invalid because he is using powers he doesn’t have.

We would argue that he is making powers up, and they will be enforced, so he does have them. And once it is established that he has executive powers like the US president, and no one squawks too much because we all want the carbon tax to go, his next batch will be profoundly bad for Canadians, and there will be no way to stop them, because he did one, and everyone accepts then that he can. And of course, the police and RCMP do what they are told. So yeah. he signs the cheques so to speak, so he can take these powers for himself as he sees fit. Read the images below the CBC video.

3. Here is a near perfect example of a guy who is paradigmatically locked to a system that was dismantled in all but name many years ago now. In a very real way, we could call this man controlled opposition, even if he is fully committed to our side of the ideological issues. His inability to see what is actually happening based on how he thinks things are supposed to work, makes him an agent of the enemy.

The National Post offers this article which has a brief nod to how unusual this Order in Council is, but not detailing that it is not Canadian procedure, and goes on to explain that the motive is probably to take the main sail out of Piere Poilievre’s campaign, mostly about removing the Carbon tax. But it does explain how Carney is doing with the Carbon tax what a three card monty dealer does with the queen. Maybe that’s how he got his last name.

4. The New York Times has now moved to showing us the second curtain on Covid measures.

Yet in 2020, when people started speculating that a laboratory accident might have been the spark that started the Covid-19 pandemic, they were treated like kooks and cranks. Many public health officials and prominent scientists dismissed the idea as a conspiracy theory, insisting that the virus had emerged from animals in a seafood market in Wuhan, China. And when a nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance lost a grant because it was planning to conduct risky research into bat viruses with the Wuhan Institute of Virology — research that, if conducted with lax safety standards, could have resulted in a dangerous pathogen leaking out into the world — no fewer than 77 Nobel laureates and 31 scientific societies lined up to defend the organization.

So, the Wuhan research was totally safe and the pandemic was definitely caused by natural transmission: It certainly seemed like consensus.

We have since learned, however, that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story. And as for that Wuhan laboratory’s research, the details that have since emerged show that safety precautions may have been terrifyingly lax.

The article goes to great pains to show how the lab leak theory was suppressed, although fails to mention the NYT role in that suppression. But near the bottom you get to the illusion painted on the outside of the second curtain. The real problem is Trump, RFK Jr. and his “anti-vaccine” stances that they claim, killed a child with measles. At best this article is what chess players would call a gambit. They are sacrificing a Knight to try and get at the King.

POSTSCRIPT:

Those familiar with the machinations Trudeau used to install Mark Carney to the levers of power in Canada may wish to look at this relatively recent video of JT somewhat in this light of this article.

 

Dutch Maj. General takes the position that we live in an imposed pseudo-reality created by the state and enforced by the media

Posted on by

Regulars of this site may recognize the concepts in this video and the companion RAIR article as being the message of Maj, (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin for many years now. Even so, it is amazing to see this understanding coming from someone as deep in the military establishment as this Maj. General in the Dutch army.

Counterspell: Political warfare, how to counter it, recognizing a traitor through dialectic phrases and heuristics and your enemy and mine, the United Nations

Posted on by

Here are a couple of tweets from The Counterspell Group.

There is a lot to unpack in them, but a couple of things jumped out at me first pass.

First, the Tweets:

Full text:

If we reinterpret Plato’s “Republic” through the lens of an esoteric strategy for oligarchic control:

Class Division as a Control Mechanism: In Plato’s ideal state, society is structured into three classes: the producers (workers), the auxiliaries (soldiers), and the guardians (philosopher-kings). If this is an esoteric message, it could be suggesting that by organizing society into clearly defined groups, an oligarchy could control the narrative and identity of each group. The producers, preoccupied with material needs, would be too busy or uneducated to challenge the system, while the auxiliaries, trained in obedience and bravery, would enforce the status quo. The guardians, or the oligarchs themselves, would maintain their power through intellectual and supposed moral superiority, thus legitimizing their rule.

Democracy as a Controlled Chaos: Plato’s critique of democracy in the “Republic” might be read as an instruction manual on how to manage or manipulate a democratic system. By allowing a semblance of freedom and choice, the populace feels empowered, but true power remains with those who understand and control the system’s underlying mechanics. Democracy, in this view, becomes a facade where citizens believe they have power through voting, but the real control lies in who frames the debates, controls the information, and educates or misleads the populace.

Identity and Information Control: Plato’s emphasis on education and the type of stories allowed in his state could be interpreted as a blueprint for controlling information. By deciding what narratives are culturally acceptable or beneficial, oligarchs could shape the identity of different classes. For instance, certain myths or stories might be promoted to keep the lower classes content with their status, believing in a just world where their position is natural or divinely ordained. Meanwhile, the elite would possess the ‘true’ knowledge, manipulating public perception through controlled information dissemination.

Esoteric vs. Exoteric Teachings: The idea that Plato wrote esoterically means there’s a hidden message for the initiated (the oligarchs) and an apparent message for the uninitiated (the masses).

Democracy, according to this interpretation, might be described as inherently flawed not because it gives too much freedom, but because it can be easily manipulated. The esoteric message could be that by promoting divisive identities (class, profession, even personal virtues like courage or wisdom), the oligarchy ensures the populace remains fragmented, too busy with internal squabbles to unite against the ruling class.
Manipulation Through Philosophy and Education: The philosopher-kings, who are supposed to be the wisest, could represent the oligarchs themselves. Their education in the “forms” or true reality could be Plato’s way of suggesting that those in power should always hold a monopoly on knowledge and truth. By defining what is “good” or “just,” they control the moral landscape, ensuring their actions are always justified by higher knowledge that the common person can’t grasp or challenge.
The Ship of State Analogy: Plato’s analogy of the ship, where the owner (the state) is ignorant, and the sailors (democracy) argue over control, could be seen as a cautionary tale but also a guide. It suggests that in a democracy, the real power lies in convincing the owner (the populace) to let the “knowledgeable” (oligarchs) captain the ship, thereby legitimizing their rule under the guise of expertise or wisdom.

In this reinterpretation, Plato’s “Republic” might not advocate for a just state but could be read as a guide on how to maintain power through subtle manipulations of societal structure, education, and information, under the guise of establishing an ideal state. This perspective would see Plato’s work not as a straightforward political treatise but as a layered text where democracy is a tool for control, not empowerment.

Ok so about that one sentence. Esoteric Vs. Exoteric teachings. When one thinks of Kamala Harris, we may have the quintessential example of esoteric messaging. What sounds like word-salad to most thinking people, can be interpreted by the masses as being some nicety which people can allow themselves to think they understand in their own terms. Strength through joy might be an example, but also, something like imagine a future unencumbered by what has been, is clearly esoteric messaging. Sophisticates in communist double speak know exactly what both these phrases mean.

Moving on to the video:

Please do watch this with a focus.

How do we recognize the enemy in political warfare.

By the time we got a third of the way in, a couple of things jumped out at us.

Once, when we had the opportunity to ask Jordan Peterson a question at his talk at the Ottawa Library about cultural appropriation as a trick of the left to deliberately disenfranchise Western culture in several ways, and pointed out the example of a white woman who taught Yoga for free at Ottawa U and was made, after several years of doing so to the benefit of students, the handicapped and the mentally stressed, to leave because she was “culturally appropriating Hindu Culture,” Peterson responded with that exact quote. Although that was several years ago, it has bothered me steadily since. Likely it was a throw-away answer in place of any real thought as opposed to a dialectic to negate the point. But how interesting is it that in fact, from a heuristic point of view, that is what it is meant to do.

By half way, the concept of heuristics, where we judge the purpose of a thing by its results, reminds us of a Canadian lawyer that constantly raises money from people damaged by the Canadian vaxx mandates, or even the vaxx damaged themselves, and then launches law suits that are quite literally written to fail. Then go forward to claim publicly that these losses, major ones, sone of which are dismissed with prejudice (Chat GPT describes that term thusly: the claim is permanently dismissed and cannot be brought back to court. This decision prevents the plaintiff from refiling the case on the same grounds. The dismissal serves as a final judgment against the plaintiff on that claim, effectively concluding the legal dispute over those specific issues) and then claims to his donators that these are in fact victories, and goes on to raise funds for new claims, or appeals where possible. If one examines this lawyer’s history, we may find in the past he acted on behalf of drug companies and always took left leaning positions in the cases he took. Therefore, using a heuristic approach, we might come to the conclusion that this lawyer is indeed controlled opposition.

Looking at the UN, or as we should know it, the COMINTERN as the enemy:

UN General Assembly passes resolution calling for Jerusalem Old City to be Jew-free

The Palestinian-fronted resolution passed by wide margin, demanding that the Israeli army and Jewish residents evacuate to pre-1949 line within a year.

(Sep. 18, 2024 / JNS)

Jerusalem’s Old City, in addition to Judea and Samaria, must be Judenrein within a year, according to a Palestinian-drafted resolution, which the U.N. General Assembly passed on Wednesday.

The resolution, which passed by a 124-14 margin with 43 abstentions, is meant to give force to a July advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice, which declared Israeli presence to be illegal in any area over the 1949 armistice line.

More than 40 countries sponsored the resolution, which was the first that Palestinians filed after being granted unprecedented privileges, for a non-U.N. member, earlier this year.

The resolution calls on the Israel Defense Forces to withdraw completely from Judea and Samaria, eastern Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip within 12 months, which means evacuating all Jewish communities beyond the armistice line, including Jerusalem’s Old City.

If the UN can declare that no Jewish people may live in the old city of Jerusalem, then they can declare that any people can lose the right to live anywhere at all. Penguins must vacate the Antarctic. If you can conjure a logic that demands a total and unrestricted migration for all the peoples of the world to freely move to any nation they want, meaning Western nations, and that the media must write favourably on this plan, while simultaneously claiming that Jewish people have no right to the old city of Jerusalem, then they can conjure up an entire grimoire on why you cannot remain wherever it is you are.

And of course, the UN plan to use hate-speech as a way of censoring the people of the world who oppose communist and authoritarian narratives and diktats.

As an afterthought, there are a lot of local laws being put into place in Western nations now to make them subservient to the UN resolutions and compacts etc. As well as from their sub-departments like the WHO. Canada is currently working on passing at least three laws that we know of, each of which signals a total deconstruction of a fundamental of individualism and liberty, and most Canadians haven’t got a clue. We have written on all of these extensively here.

But what the hell:

Bills C-63 and C-637

Bill C-4

Bill C-293. A bill which would make Canada subservient to the new EU-UN-WHO Pandemic diktat. For those who have not watched the Dutch TV show segment on this issue, please do so

Important addendum thanks to Zorost

 

Must watch: Victim of Cancel Culture interview Graham Linehan

Posted on by

This is an amazing interview with one of the best comedy writers out there. He is the writer of two UK comedy series, which are both among my personal favourites. The IT Crowd, and Father Ted. Father Ted is more, sort of folksy/provincial than The IT Crowd, which one should not watch without oxygen nearby as the danger of suffocation from uncontrollable laughter is quite real. Father Ted is kinda like an 80s CBC show, like The Beachcombers except funny. Still, it has a certain charm with 2 of the episodes being screamingly funny. Specifically Speed III and Are You Right there Father Ted?

This interview is about how he was cancelled for having a counter-revolutionary view. And you can see and hear his great intellect whirring as they ask questions like, “Why do you think this happened to you” and then more pointedly, “why did this happen to you?” Different questions but both being answered in a way that showed great insight, but insufficient knowledge.

Readers of this site will have the answers. And one of the consistent tells that the people valiantly trying to hold back the tide in this interview that we can hear, is the expression of a number of events as being ironic, when we know they are not. DEI for example, we know as a dialectical line of effort to destroy the merit principle. Failure to understand this leads to a false belief that it is an attempt to correct injustices in our system, when in fact it is a weapon against our system altogether with the added defence built in that all who oppose it are to be cancelled. Aufhaben der Kultur. This is the missing key here, or one of them.

His comparison to cancel culture with scientology is also very insightful and a worthwhile analogy, but incomplete. His off the shoulder quip about those who cancel others as being regime police was actually spot on. But the giggles afterwards make me think they don’t actually get that. If they had, they would have grown pale in the face instead of laughed.

Graham, like JK Rowling, was establishment left before he became one of the revolution’s victims. As the old joke goes, ‘A conservative is a leftist who’s been mugged’.

Even so, this is an amazingly insightful interview and an excellent look at the state of the revolution from one of its victims. I hope you all enjoy and comment.

Link to his book

 

“Germany is now communist” -Co-founder of Fidesz with Viktor Orban

Posted on by

Theory and proof

Co-Founder of Hungary’s Fidesz party and veteran journalist examines Germany’s replacement policy with migration:

German news item exemplifying the above from January 2020:

German news item from this last month or so:

Teen arrested at Ottawa’s NAC for speaking out against the crime of sexualizing children

Posted on by

Yesterday in Ottawa, a protest was held against a drag show for children, that is explicitly against the law when we had such a thing. The leader is a 17 year old Catholic school student that was suspended for stating that there are two sexes. Please read the story at RAIR Foundation.

Postmedia story here

Quebec cancels the culture just in time for New Year’s Eve

Posted on by

DEC 30 2021 – QUEBEC – – Health Issues – CURFEW

Starting from December 31, 2021: a curfew will be in effect between 10 p.m. and 5 a.m. and certain health measures will be tightened throughout Québec

[…]Offenders are liable to fines ranging from $1 000 to $6 000 if they are unable to adequately justify why they are outside the home.

Young people 14 years of age and over are subject to a $500 fine.

[…]To enable individuals who are travelling during the curfew because of their work to readily demonstrate that such travel is legitimate, <b>employers are asked to complete the Employer Attestation Concerning Travel During the Curfew Decreed by the Gouvernement du Québec.</b>

download the attestation :

https://cdn-contenu.quebec.ca/cdn-contenu/sante/documents/Problemes_de_sante/covid-19/Attestation_Deplacement_Couvre-feuANG_VF2022.docx?1640899798

https://www.quebec.ca/en/health/health-issues/a-z/2019-coronavirus/measures-in-force/curfew

How Canada became communist/how communist is Canada

Posted on by

Last year, a friend took the time and effort to print out an amazing essay about the history of communist activists and the effect they had on Canadian culture and politics, dating back quite a while. My friend has been very patient with me, only reminding me now and again to get in gear and read it. It is difficult to find time to read a 26 page pdf these days and truth be told, the only way I can really do it is printing it out, binding it and taking it to a cafe or something and reading it at the table. No distractions by phones or screens. Covid closures made this impossible.

Now that I am well into this document, I have to say, she has been much more patient with me than I would have been with her had I read this and printed it out for her. This is jaw dropping from beginning to end.

So today was the day. And wow! a lot of other materials posted to this site, and personal observations clicked into place like pieces of a jigsaw-puzzle, if the jigsaw was a picture was of the gates of Hell.

Here is a link to the document directly:

After reading that, please consider watching this very short interview with a powerful man of destiny for the COMINTERN, Pierre Trudeau’s son, explain how he plans to finish his father’s work. This clip is from 2006. And if you read even the first 6 pages of the PDF, you now know what that work actually is.

The connection between the video above and the document can be easily seen on page 4 of the .pdf. Pierre Trudeau’s use of the War Measures Act, and his opposition to Quebec separatism were both tactical to advance Communism in Canada overall. Like everything else with the left, the point is never the point and the revolution is always the point. Justin alludes to the same goals and means above.

At this point, it should be clear that Justin Trudeau has Canada firmly on the same path his father, and stunningly, Lester Pearson, who was also a communist before him, set for Canada.

So where does that put us now?

Franky, it puts is more willing to listen to some of the more horrifying explanations for Covid measures around the world. From unnecessarily shutting down the economies, to making people prisoners in their own homes, and ultimately to forced vaccinations. Which will lead to more forced vaccinations and boosters and eventually the normalization of the total lack of freedom and privacy we already see being legislated in France and Italy and other states. It even makes us wonder if perhaps the vaccines, or later on, as the VP of Pfizer has said on multiple occasions, the boosters, might be used as a population cull.

Reposting two of the segments from Thursday’s Reiner Fuellmich’s webcast, they seem just slightly less unbelievable than perhaps they might have before reading the “Canada Became Communist” document.

Thank you Mad W. for your patience with me on this.