1. The portal to the evidence of the Allison Inquiry over damage to people from the mRNA shots is still blocked on the Government network. One of the people who testified was in fact a WHO scientist and writer whose specialty was vaccines. Her testimony was similar to many others, but from her particular perch, it counts for a lot.

2. Here are what we see as three similar tactics which reveal the strategy Carney and the communists in control of much of the West have used in the past few years. There are more of course, but these three are interesting because they adhere to common purpose and tactics. Also are derived from the same strategy.

A: No Kings

B: No pipeline

C: No 51st state.

It is a foundational principle of analysis for this site that “with the left, the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point”. Thus when the left launches a narrative attack, the reason for it is never the reason, but the ultimate (and obvious when you think of it)  intended result, (which has little to nothing to do with the protest or objection) always does. So in those three examples, we can illustrate this.

The No Kings protests were and are the most risible. At one point, a lot of leftists were lined up at the US Embassy in Ottawa with No Kings posters, slogans, chants etc. even effigies of Trump while at the same time, King Charles was in Parliament laying it out to Canada how things were gonna be from now on. The No Kings was a propaganda effort to try and paint Donald Trump, at the time and to this day, one of the very few counter-revolutionary politicians in the world, as a King, tantamount to a dictator, and therefore must be opposed. It likely worked better on the Americans as they fought a revolutionary war against a King. The Canadian left doesn’t care about the logic of it. They just wanted to focus hatred on Donald Trump, 1984 style. But the ultimate goal is to create a communist dictatorship. Paint Donald Trump as a King in order to make him appear as an unelected dictator,.(In Canada, that will tie into item C nicely.) So “No Kings” means get rid of an elected president who is restoring individual liberties, and replace the system with a communist dictator.

Here is one of the No Kings demos from June 2025 at the US Embassy.

The pipeline protests, including no shortage of terrorism in Canada, was really part of the mission to destroy Canada-US relations and trade. Mark Carney who is in fact, King of the Net Zero bollux, approved a pipeline, but one that doesn’t go North South to the US, but west to far west, presumably so that Canadian oil can be exported to China. Carney has also fast tracked it. Spelling it out, this means Canada at the state level was never anti oil, or anti-pipeline. Which also means not anti-CO2. They were anti-USA and especially anti-Trump. Again, the point is never the point. The replacement of a republic like state, with solid principles of liberty and individualism with an elitist run communist state where all decisions are made by faceless nameless bureaucrats thousands of miles away and where no mechanism exists for the people affected by those decisions, IS THE POINT.

No 51st state should be obvious at this point. Canada faked patriotism when Trump trolled Canada on the 51st state thing. They suddenly became flag waving patriots ranting about national sovereignty. Mind you, these were all mass line narrative attacks, seeded by small groups of professional protestors, fed to the public via CBC which landed in the brains of people who think legacy media contains information as opposed to narratives and propaganda. For a few years after the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, when you saw a Canadian flag on a vehicle or a home window, you know it was an actual patriot, who valued individualism and liberty. Essentially people who remembered Canada as a republic more or less, (definitions to follow) as opposed to a malleable ‘Democracy’ where the absolute fundamentals can be changed by nudging the culture with a mass line. Shortly after the 51st state troll, the left took back the Canadian flag, and when you see it in a home now, its a token of fealty to Mark Carney, anti-Americanism, and policies that are actually deracinating Canada faster than most would believe. The flag is a token of loyalty to the destruction of Canada. But then a history of the flag of Canada suggests the Maple Leaf version itself was intended to do that, as it replaced a flag, The Red Ensign, which contained meaningful symbols of Canadian heritage.

Carney and his dialectical engineers have decided to drop the no 51st state chanting for a yes to the 27th member state of the Communist European Union. The EU has a layer above the European Parliament which is the European Commission. They are pretty much totally unaccountable. Below is a video that an Irish MEP made, showing how the EU Library was pretty much locked away from not just the public, but even MEPs. They could only go in so long as they had no recording equipment whatsoever. No camera, no cell phone, and they could not leave with any of the materials concerning the operations of the European Commission. If the odd MEP went rogue and tried to expose the EU for what it is, they would have no proof of the claims they would make about the dictatorial and communist nature of the European Commission.

I really hope you all watched the video above. This is from 10 years ago. This is what the EU is. And it at least suggests that the European Parliament is a Potemkin legislature. A puppet theatre to release steam from any members of the public who notice the destruction of their nation states due to EU and UN policies. This way, the odd MEP can stand up and make a stink and the proles can pretend that something is being done about it. In fairness, it is, but in the opposite way from what they wanted.

Search for videos and articles by and about Vladimir Bukovsky. Especially if you can find articles on him via Diana West.

Link to article

One line of the article is here:

• “accuses a group of carrying out secret conspiracies to gain global control or that they are plotting to destroy western civilization”

But it’s a fact. The Muslim Brotherhood is indeed doing exactly that. The Project, and the Memorandum both explicitly state what the plan is for religious Muslims to do as it is specified within Islam’s own canon. My guess based on how things have been in Canada for the last 20 years or so, is people who make factual and verifiable claims about certain groups will face persecution, while people who launch massive conspiracies about Jews, which takes place in every mosque every day, will not. Why can we say this? Because it has already been tested when Muslims have broken existing and far more rational ‘hate crimes laws’ if such a thing is possible.

In any case, anyone who thinks this is great and antisemitism will be illegal and finally Jew will be protected from hate yada yada wuzza wuzza, lemme tells ya, that ain’t how it’s gonna go.

It will massively increase hatred of Jews who will be seen, and partially correctly, as being the architects of destroying freedom of speech. They will suddenly appear to be that exact thing which people have accused Jews of being forever. A tiny group that controls everything. And there will only be enforcement against whatever target suits the real interests of the state. Chances are extremely high that groups like the dialectically named, “Canadian Anti-Hate Network” will fund a few Nazis like Second Sons or Diagalon, and the state will pick off a few of them to make examples of them. We can say that with high confidence because their parent organization the SPLC was funding every hate group they could find.

But no charges against any mosques that actually demand genocide of the Jews at pretty much every prayer session and twice on Fridays.

This is one example out of hundreds available on MEMRI.Org, RAIR Foundation, Gates of Vienna and here for that matter. This one is from Toronto.

And below is a story about one brave Montrealer who tried to bring one of the most virulent imams to the Human Rights Commission.

But wait! There’s More!

Full text:

Ezra Levant: Thanks to floor crossers, Carney can now ram through his spy bill

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill.

The answer? It is a direct assault on parliamentary democracy and your freedoms.

Last year, Mark Carney won the election with just 43 percent of the vote. That delivered him 169 seats out of 343 in the House of Commons, three short of the 172 needed for a majority. Canadians deliberately gave him a minority government. Sometimes voters do that on purpose, wanting to keep a politician on a shorter leash and force him to work with Parliament rather than dominate it.

But Carney was not content with the verdict of the electorate. While the political establishment spent years warning that Donald Trump might refuse to accept election results, Carney set about changing his own. By persuading a string of opposition MPs to cross the floor, he secured the majority Canadians had declined to give him at the ballot box.

The obvious question is why? Justin Trudeau governed for nearly a decade without a formal majority, relying on NDP support to pass budgets and survive confidence votes. There was little reason to believe Carney could not have done the same.

Ezra’s answer is that Carney wanted something more than legislative support. He wanted the ability to shut down parliamentary scrutiny itself.

That is now on full display.

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill. The legislation would compel technology companies to retain user data for up to a year and make that information available to government authorities. Civil liberties advocates have raised serious concerns about privacy, government overreach and the expansion of state surveillance powers.

The concerns are hardly theoretical. Canadians have already witnessed a government willing to freeze bank accounts and invoke extraordinary powers during the trucker protests. Mark Carney himself, while living in Europe at the time, wrote in The Globe and Mail that Ottawa should take a harder line against convoy participants and their supporters. It is therefore not surprising that critics view Bill C-22 as part of a broader push toward greater state control.

What makes the situation particularly troubling is not only the substance of the legislation but the manner in which it is being advanced.

The government has introduced a motion declaring that, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-22 will be pushed through Parliament on an accelerated timetable. In plain English, the normal rules are being set aside.

Committee members will have just 30 minutes to complete clause-by-clause consideration of the bill. Any remaining amendments will be deemed moved and voted upon without further debate. The legislation will then move rapidly through report stage and third reading with strictly limited speaking time for opposition parties and virtually no opportunity for extended scrutiny.

For a bill that constitutes one of the most significant expansions of government surveillance powers in Canadian history, Parliament is being afforded remarkably little time to examine the details.

Professor Michael Geist, one of Canada’s leading experts on technology law and digital policy, has publicly criticized the government’s approach. Geist argues that hearings are being cut short, amendments are being rushed through without proper discussion, and the public is being denied the transparency normally expected during the legislative process. His warning is not about partisan politics but about the erosion of parliamentary accountability.

This is why Carney needed those extra seats.

The issue is not merely that opposition MPs crossed the floor. It is what those additional seats are now being used to accomplish. This is a double violation of democratic principles: first, altering the balance of Parliament after voters had already spoken; and second, using that altered balance to restrict Parliament’s ability to debate, amend and scrutinize legislation.

The implications extend beyond a single bill. Across Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Australia, governments are increasingly embracing online surveillance measures, age-verification requirements and expanded regulatory control over digital spaces. These initiatives are almost always presented as necessary protections for children or public safety, yet they also require citizens to surrender more privacy and give governments more information about their online activities.

It is a stark contrast to the vision of technological progress championed by figures such as Elon Musk, who promote innovation, space exploration, artificial intelligence and the expansion of human potential. One approach sees technology as a tool of freedom and advancement. The other increasingly treats it as something to be monitored, regulated and controlled.

This is what an unchecked majority can look like under Mark Carney: Parliament reduced to a rubber stamp, debate curtailed, privacy placed at risk and major legislation rushed through with minimal scrutiny.

Canadians deserve better.

The democratic process only matters if it is respected when it becomes inconvenient. If Parliament is no longer permitted to properly examine legislation, question witnesses or challenge the government of the day, then the institution itself is diminished. That should concern every Canadian regardless of political affiliation.

1. We have seen more pushback on Bill C-22 than we have on what are arguably at least, more intrusive bills like C-4. C-4 was where the state has the right to talk your child into getting surgery and chemical regimens that would sterilize them and create medical experiments out of them, while potentially jailing parents for up to 5 years merely for attempting to talk them out of it. These procedures which are somewhat between Joseph mengele and Dr. Frankenstein. drastically raises the suicide rate and lowers the happiness rate of these children. That for us here at VTB was the most authoritarian and communist bill. Communist in that the children then belonged to the state. It should be added that Dr. Frankenstein at least had the decency to experiment on corpses. Not Children.

But the pushback against C-22 is really showing up on my various info-sources. Which is a great thing. Of course on people who don’t know about it or are not against it, they won’t see this material at all. So will logically pass over these objections as crazy conspiracy theories as they head down to the pharmacy for their 11th mRNA Covid gene therapy shot.

In the video below, he details some aspects of that bill that have been softened. These things were almost certainly trial balloons. Or perhaps more accurately, let’s call them context decoys. The way that works is, I want to pass a bill that lets me steal half your stuff and turn half your children into slaves. So my initial bill states that I can take all your stuff anytime I want and under any conditions, and your children can be herded into cattle cars for my purpose, and then after some light pushback from a few politicians, I get exactly what I wanted in the first place and maybe even a little more. Thinking about that as you listen to the video below may offer a little more clarity.

Bill C-22 Surveils Ordinary Canadians While Leaving Cartel Networks Untouched

OTTAWA — When The Bureau published its analysis of Bill C-2 last fall, the diagnosis was unsparing.

Ottawa had confused expansion of state power over ordinary Canadians with the enforcement tools Canada actually needs to confront the Chinese Triads, Mexican cartels, and hostile-state networks that have turned Canadian cities into operational platforms for the hemisphere’s most dangerous criminal organizations. The government has now repackaged that same flawed instinct under a new number. Bill C-22, the so-called Lawful Access Act, deserves the same verdict.

The critics arriving at that conclusion now span an extraordinary coalition. Signal, the secure messaging service used by millions of Canadians — including journalists and dissidents seeking to avoid scrutiny from hostile state spies — has warned it would rather withdraw from Canada than compromise the privacy promises it has made to its users.

Tobi Lütke, founder and chief executive of Shopify, Canada’s most important technology company, has called Bill C-22 “a huge mistake” that “may well end up dealing a death blow to Canadian tech viability,” and has publicly urged Ottawa’s Public Safety Minister to study expert opinion on the bill’s fatal flaws.

[…] That last point is not a partisan complaint. It is a warning from Canada’s most important security partner that Ottawa is about to create vulnerabilities that hostile states — the very states The Bureau has spent three years documenting as active threats on Canadian soil — will be positioned to exploit.

The above from Sam Cooper’s The Bureau. Please read the rest at the link above.

Dean of Law, Bruce Pardy discusses bull C-63 with Jordan Peterson. I think a great deal of what is said in this video can be applied to C-22 as the issues are the same. This is however, one hour and fifty minutes. So maybe it is for those who are deeply concerned with this issue. If so, again you can listen while doing other things. I will likely focus on the entire video as I do household chores because I am certain it is worth the time. This is a two year old video as well. But the actual issue, state overreach to create a totalitarian surveillance state, is as current as ever.

John Carpay on bill C-22. John Carpay is the head of the JCCF, a Canadian constitutional law firm and one of about 3 I know of that actually works towards preserving individual rights in Canada, as opposed to destroying them.

There were other bills that were of a similar nature, some of which included retroactive prosecution. In other words, if you had done something when it was not a crime after they passed this bill, the state could prosecute you after they passed the bill.

The videos on that are below and shot in Ottawa of John Carpay explaining the exact details. The bills died when they did not get passed by the Senate. But there have been indications that Carney intends to resurrect them, or likely draft new ones with the same intentions.

For those that like clear video, please click the little gear bottom right after you start playing the videos and select the highest option.

THIS POST may get updated with more materials on C-22 as they occur.