Category Archives: Evidence of Western countries becoming communist

Ezra Levant goes to the Ostrich farm

Posted on by

So I still have no clue what this is about. The ONLY thing I think is the case, is that the state is behaving as usual, in a tyrannical fashion, where any science or medical facts have nothing to do with it, and narrative enforcement and arbitrary state authority have everything to do with it. This is par for Canada for some time now.

Ezra Levant does a ‘just the facts ma’am’ style report for which we are grateful.

UPDATE:

Ok I think I know where to land on this after watching the video above and giving it some thought.

First, we posted a video demonstrating the position of the state apparently. It had an ex UK police officer. You can know which one it is by the accent and bluntly authoritative tone he used.

Everything he said was frankly, bullshit.

There is zero mention of Covid, spike proteins or any of the other nonsense he spouted. No one is making any claims about that.

On the side of the protestors, there is a lot of arguments. But frankly I found it all exhausting because these are all, to borrow a phrase from SC, “Blue Pill Players”, And what I mean by that is they were arguing as if the issue was the issue and the facts matter.

Here is what makes sense to me.

IF the state, in this case represented by a Canadian food bureaucracy, and any number of highly paid state thugs, had any case at all to do what they did, they would have taken this issue to court. There would be a public hearing and if the farmers were found to be in the wrong based on real legal reasons, there would be warrants issued and we would see what is taking place. Now maybe that did happen and I am unaware. But no one has mentioned anything like that at all.

What I do know then, is Canadians have zero private property rights. At any time state thugs under the thinnest of auspices can storm your property, set up weapons systems, DISABLE YOUR ABILITY TO MONITOR YOUR OWN PROPERTY and carry on destroying your livestock or take whatever they want.

The two basic rules stand then.

With the left, the point is never the point. The revolution is always the point

When you see people arguing based on science, facts and reason they are likely fully missing the point. Like the vaccines. The ONLY issue was, “You do NOT have the RIGHT to make me take this stuff, even if it will save the entire human race”. Everything else was a distraction. I’m using the word, distraction in order not to say “bullshit” twice in any one post.

So there you have it. Like everything else, the Ostrich thing, as detailed by Ezra in the video above since every possible reason was given for the state not to take this action, but they are anyway, likely means this is about changing law so that what was ultra-vires, is now just a signature by a bureaucrat to destroy anything and everything for anyone, either because they are an obstacle to the revolution, or arbitrarily.

 

Canada’s top constitutional law firm has a serious warning for Canada about currently debated authoritarian legislation

Posted on by

The following video is an interview for RAIR Foundation with the founder and senior person at The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms in Canada, John Carpay.

This law firm has a very special modus operandi.

They only take clients where the case represents a serious concern to the constitutional and individual rights of all Canadians.

They take these cases pro-bono, depending on donors to fund their efforts. This is very important. This goes to motive for the defence as well as motive for choosing the cases. The JCCF has defended many people in the Freedom Convoy, and has taken on some of the more egregious cases in the wake of the dialectically named, “Canadian Human Rights Councils” if memory serves.

In this video Carpay covers many impending bills that the Carney regime is putting through as laws that will absolutely gut the very concept of individualism, let alone individual rights. Carney also indicated he may resurrect various Trudeau era bills that will do the same.

The synopsis of this interview can be seen at RAIR. 

I hope any Canadian or British person who reads this site will watch this interview and spread it around. Frankly, Canadians really need to understand this material. And John Carpay delivers the facts with a calm, rational manner that makes this even more chilling than the kind of hysterical hyperbole we see around these issues by counter-narrative media As that has become the new normal, the constant hysteria has also become less effective.

 

Digital ID in Canada: Without fact checking this video, it is consistent with all the other legislation being passed by Parliament since Trudeau/Carney took over.

Posted on by

Please watch this whole video.

No matter how accurate the analysis of the presenter s, we do see a brilliant and diamond clear example of the classic interpretation of problem, reaction solution. The state brings in millions of hostile illegals to the UK and funds them (as they do in Canada) and then claims the nation needs a digital ID because they have to cope with the problem of illegals working. This is ludicrous at so many levels it qualifies as Kafkaesque. The illegals likely don’t have to work as they get rather nice hotels and better meals than they did at home. Digital ID will likely not stop them from doing anything the state claims they don’t want them to do. Digital ID will give the state unprecedented control over the indigenous population of GB and likely the illegals will not be required to get digital ID in much the same way they were not required to take the mRNA injections in Canada and the USA.

More on Bill C8

One prediction:

During Covid, we saw the Canadian government destroy (temporarily at first) the most fundamental component of a republic or ‘democracy’. And that was the right of exit. The right to leave the country if you wanted to, for whatever reason. They used Covid to stop you from leaving Canada at one point.

You can bet the last coin you have in your pocket that once this is implemented, you will not be able to pack up and go somewhere less fascistic/communist. Canada will become a prison.

Those of you in a position to get a secure bolt hole in some other country where the threat of totalitarianism is less imminent may be well advised to do so now.

On censorship, ‘fascism’ and media in North America

Posted on by

I could probably write steadily for an entire week on this subject, injecting videos and news items to prove the thesis.

But there are other things to do which matter as well, and taking place all over, which need attention. Helen Grus is speaking shortly for the first time and allowing it to be filmed and published. This should be very interesting.

But I would like to start by making sense of all the items I plan to post with a simple metric which is consistent across multiple subjects, and eliminates the constant bickering about “hypocrisy” which our side uses, constantly, but which in fact is simply not the case.

This is targeted use of language for an effect. With the left, the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point.

Clever, right? So what does it mean.

When the left argues for a regulation, law or change in the culture, the reasons they give are never the reasons for which they want the law. The real reason is always destruction of Western thought down to the roots.

Examples are too easy and its basically all this site is about.

But to pick a few examples anyway:

Abortion as a women’s rights issue is about the negation of the concept of the sanctity of life. It then moved on to state controlled euthanasia, which is now the leading cause of death in Canada.

Vaccine mandates was to negate the idea that your body is your own or that you get to make any medical choices in your interests. Only the collective counts, and doubly so when it makes no sense at all. Like how an unvaccinated person could POSSIBLY be a threat to someone who has actually taken multiple injections of a safe and effective vaccine.

If there is irony there, it is that it turned out to be partially true. People who had the shots get much sicker from Covid than the people who did not take it, and are more likely to get it.

The state has the right to convince your own young children in schools that they are somehow born in the wrong body, and start a course of surgical mutilation that would make Mary Shelly blush with horror. The state then criminalized parents who tried to get their children to wait till they were old enough to get a beer or a tattoo before they got sterilized and turned into a simulacrum of the other sex. (Bill C-4)

They marketed this as “trans-affirming care” and used the critical theory attack of Trans-phobe if you oppose this. Also of course, the laser-painting terms of Fascist and Nazi, which they used to laser paint Charlie Kirk and get him assassinated. But not just him. Several attempts on President Trump as well of course and many others. Tim Fortune, Theo Van Gogh, nearly everyone who worked at Charlie Hebdo etc.

And now we move on to censorship.

A solid example of what looks like hypocrisy is floating around Twitter. How Canadian emery propaganda treats the firing of Jimmy Kimmel, vs. how the same media exactly treated the firing of a Canadian conservative icon, Don Cherry.

Cherry worked for the CBC

The CBC is a state agent.

Firing him for pointing out that migrants tended not to wear poppies on Remembrance Day, which was in essence a truism that the people our government is importing to replace us, have no connection to our culture, values, or share the honouring of our war dead, who actually did fight against real fascism, and authoritarianism of many kinds. He was correct. But Cherry violated a state narrative.

A private company firing a talk show host for what is tantamount to ‘flagrante delicto’ is a very, very common thing to do in the entertainment world, and is not censorship. If any artist brings his associated partners into disrepute, or exposes them to liability by their actions, firing them is normal and common. It is only censorship when the state itself seeks to silence you, and especially for a counter-narrative position.

What the Biden White House did to Alex Berenson was absolutely censorship. There is no definition where this would not be the case. Search Berenson’s Substack for his suit against the Biden White House for more on that.

Twitter also censored the two Indian scientists that wrote a paper proving that Covid was made in a lab in the very early days. You can read our article on that and download the paper here.

This was almost certainly also by the state. At the time, the narrative was that the virus was from a wet market. Actual proof, which would lead back to various US agents was not to be permitted. Please feel free to download that paper and send to anyone who has the scientific acumen to understand it.

Judges are also using sentencing to destroy our rule of law and sense of justice. We see people in jail for much longer periods for saying something on social media which opposes a state narrative attack on our culture than, say, raping 2 girls under 9 years old.

This is from a year ago, and in the USA.

In this article about a swarming attack of a Jewish couple in Venice Italy, there is no reference to them being caught at all. But they used a broken bottle as a weapon.

Muslims in the West, calling for women to be stoned to death, for sexual misconduct. Again though, the real issue with that beyond the sheer barbarity, is the replacement of due process with allegations and mob actions in order to establish Islamic supremacy, irrespective of the facts. Which makes it exactly like communism. And again, this is not hypocrisy. This is the careful strategic shaping of all of our Western systems to take them apart and replace them with one where the people have so little rights that most simply cannot fathom what is being done to them.

The Islamic State, which media insists on calling ISIS in order to shift it from Islam to a cartoon from the 2010s called Archer, asks Muslims to attack Christian and Jewish gatherings in the UK.

And believe it or not, the whole point of this is leading up to the banning of ANTIFA as a terrorist Organization, which it clearly is. We’ll get to it.

And this also leads to a very unfortunate data point indicating that the Conservative Party of Canada is controlled opposition at best. Active participants in the revolution at worst, based on the voting record.

The Conservatives didn’t just do a unanimous vote for Bill. C-4 on the criminalization of parents who try and talk children out of being Frankensteined, they danced in the damn isles and even asked to skip the last reading of the bill and cut right to passing it as law.

Some years before Covid, a masked group of state funded, masked thugs, would go to any protest that requested that we preserve freedom of speech in the face of Trudeau’s M-103, an attempt to make Islamophobia if not illegal, punishable defacto by a proxy army such as ANTIFA and later, BLM.

I know, I was at a lot of them. I saw masked black clad thugs in Ottawa and Montreal, prior to Covid, when it was ILLEGAL TO WEAR A MASK at a political protest. I printed out the law and showed it to the police at one these events when middle aged housewives simply wanted to preserve the basic constitutional right to freedom of speech. The police of course, did absolutely nothing.

So a group formed to protect these people from ANTIFA thuggery and intimidation. They called themselves The Proud Boys. This was simply a group of regular Canadians that felt it wasn’t right that ANTIFA could thug and intimidate nice people who were requesting basic liberty.

What was the response?

Please note that this was UNANIMOUS. The Conservatives, just like with bill C-4, voted to a man jack of them to declare the one group willing to defend people from state thugs as a terrorist group. Yet ZERO mention of ANTIFA in the legislation whatsoever. Not that it would have made it right, but it would at least be a mitigating factor had they also banned ANTIFA. But Antifa IS a terrorist group and the Proud Boys are not. The closest analogue for them I can think of at the moment would be the Red Berets from the New York Subway system, who would defend passengers since New York at the time had abandoned citizens to crime. That was prior to Mayor Giuliani of course.

Also prior to Covid, a Danish film maker made two movies. One was on the death off Europe due to Islam and Islamic crime and terrorism. People made an attempt to show the film at the Ottawa Public Library but they cancelled it at the last minute. So the film maker decided to make another film about Canada

This is that film below. The film contained interviews with ANTIFA, if such it can be called, and interviews with the Proud Boys. After seeing that, it would be interesting to know how many people still think the Conservative Party has any intention or ability to stop the destruction of Canada. Building homes for illegals at state expense is not a solution for example. Not bringing in people who can’t afford to be here and have no skills is the solution.

Moving forward, Bill C-2 allows the state to open our physical mail without warrant or any kind of due process.

Here’s a fun one. In the trial of Helen Grus, mysteriously all the txt msgs between herself and her fellow officers ALL DISAPPEARED from ALL of the phones. Add to that the Tweet below and we can say with certainty that this is now policy and NOT corruption. This is a very, very important distinction. It is not corruption, nor is it hypocrisy.

Trump at least has Sadiq Khan’s number

Here is Sadiq Khan laser painting THREE MILLION British patriots as fascists, racists and Nazis. He effectively declared open season on the British indigenous people with this tirade of communist dialectical language.

If you think this is over the top hyperbole, have a look back at this site from a decade ago and let me know if we were exaggerating then.

The Muslim rape gangs, actually more accurately, the Islamic child-sex-slave gangs, more typically known as Harems in the UK and elsewhere is a massive phenomenon, and nothing has happened to slow it down. The media in the UK still call the little girls who are raped as prostitutes, and refer to their adult Muslim rapists as “her lovers”. This remains true to this day.

There is a legendary story from the Soviet Union about a mayor or something,. that needed to show a high ranking Communist Party member how many homes he had built. HIs name was Potemkin. He ended up making a series of fake villages, just fronts for homes and stores but nothing behind them like a set for Western movie and I dunno I think it was Lenin rode on through them.

Carney took it to the next level. He created a Potemkin village to fool Canadians.

I have about 100 more items for this post. But I think for the moment we will leave it at that. More to come.

 

Thank you all for checking out this site.

The Red pill Blue pill divide widens over Charlie Kirk’s assassination propaganda

Posted on by

Posting has been light or non existent for a few days. This is from a combination of things from lots of work both related and unrelated, and attending events which would normally be something we would post videos from, but in this case, there isn’t enough meat on the bone.

But there is a great deal of material backlogged in my notes. I’ll post at least some of it tonight.

1. Two Pakistani men, a father and son, have been arrested for planting a bomb under a FOX news truck. Now while I have no idea if these men where Muslims, I mean its possible that a couple of Christian men who managed somehow to escape near-slavery in Pakistan and managed to make it to freedom in the USA would want to bomb a FOX News truck, but this feels a lot more like the Islamic version of censorship. Which is actually a lot like the leftist version of censorship that took down Pam Fortune in the Netherlands and Charlie Kirk in the USA, Jair Boslonaro in Brazil, and frankly quite a long list of counter-revolutionary figures in the last quarter century.

2. Enemy Propaganda in Canada continues its Soviet level dialectical narrative attacks on all things counter-revolutionary.

How actual Canadian people, at least in Alberta, feel about Charlie Kirk

Article by John Carpay, one of the few actual human rights lawyers left in Canada:

CARPAY: Outside of the CBC’s echo chamber, everyone is ‘far-right’

When ‘far?right’ means half the country – CBC’s smear net catches conservatives, libertarians, and anyone outside its woke bubble.

When the CBC dislikes a person or an opinion, our taxpayer-funded broadcaster calls it “controversial.” In CBC-speak, “controversial” means conservative, libertarian, religious, traditionalist, classical liberal, or otherwise not in line with woke ideology. For the CBC, there is nothing “controversial” about a man who “identifies” as a woman having an absolute right to enter women’s washrooms and other female spaces. Only those who seek to protect safe spaces for women are “controversial.”

As millions mourn the murder of American conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the CBCdescribes his pro-life and pro-Israel opinions as “controversial.” According to CBC writer Verity Stevenson, Charlie Kirk promoted “some of the far-right’s more extreme ideas.” In her story, Ms. Stevenson secures quotes from academics who describe Kirk’s “far-right” rhetoric as “harmful” and as “hate speech.” As can be expected of any good CBC employee, she reliably fails to quote academics (or anyone, for that matter) who have a different opinion.

Here, the actual agencies such as the MSM who radicalized the man who murdered Charlie Kirk, was “radicalized by the dark corners of the Internet”. We have posted enough little bits from CTV here enough for anyone to know how he and others like him were radicalized. Imagine someone who actually watches this bilge and not just clips on Twitter.

Hopefully this week we can manage top catch up on some of the evidence that points at some components of reality out of the swirling, sucking, eddy of political warfare that has taken over every sector of communications in Canada and across much of the Western world.

 

Important update on the Helen Grus sentencing hearings as of last week

Posted on by

Here are two important video interviews on the Helen Grus hearings. If you don’t know who that is, or what this is about, please read the stories at RAIR Foundation or at Donald Best’s own site.

The first video is a rare description of the seriousness of the legal malfeasance on the part of the hearings officer and the process as a whole by Bath Sheba Van Den Berg, the defence attorney for Helen Grus. Again, if you read back on this case you can see that this entire hearing was a beard for what it really was, a theatrical trial intended to make sure no one in any position of authority or influence ever challenges a state narrative, especially when that narrative is deadly dangerous and central to the purpose of what we believe was the communist revolution of 2020.

Second, a thorough description of the current state of the case by retired Toronto Police detective, Donald Best.

Donald has pointed out specifics in this case which make the real nature of it unambiguous. The fact that is is now said out loud and on the record that: “police officers now need permission to investigate crimes that have ‘political and societal ramifications’ – or where the suspects are public officials” pretty much makes clear the fundamental shift in the nature of the way the state operates.

This is no joke, and no abstraction. It is not even plotting an extrapolation into the future. This is showing how trials and hearings are to have the outcomes decided. Not based on truth or what is good for the public from a reality or rights based set of principles, but from a foundation of state narratives. This is the overt shift from a republic type of state to a communist one.

”

Please see a lot more crucial details at RAIR Foundation.

 

Matt Alexander: Fired from school board for refusing to affirm and celebrate various sexual identities to three year olds

Posted on by

Canada, even in small town Ontario, is stunningly communist.

We have defined communism many times as moving from fact and truth based institutions, to narrative driven ones.

This is an amazing example. This man’s entire family has been cancelled in one way or another because they refused to abandon values and beliefs which have been central to Canadian identity since the day of it’s founding.

There is an excellent summary of this video at RAIR Foundation. But do give it a listen please. Share it around, especially to any American friends or family or colleagues you have. Maybe if it makes it to Vice President J.D. Vance, he can give another public excoriation to Canada. One that would be richly deserved, and this could be a key data point in his talk.

Once again, free countries appear to be desperately relying on America to save us. Maybe this time though, Canada can actually become part of the US.

For those who haven’t seen it yet, JD Vance had a few words to say about the state of Europe at the 61st Munich Security Conference on February 14, 2025,

Compilation of events which demonstrate the true nature of British law and direction today

Posted on by

This is an excellent compilation of events which well describe the current system of defacto laws the British currently live under.

It is critical to understand that what is being described here is not a two tier system, or any variation of what we all knew and grew up with.

Not corruption.

Not hypocrisy.

This is the system as it is. It is very nearly pure. But it is not anything like a Republic. It is a Hegelian/Marxist dialectically operated society where the state applies force to achieve the ends it wants at that moment. And the ends will always be the diminishment of the individual and your identity however you may see it.

H/T Gates of Vienna

 

The move into a communist system of values and enforcement of ‘law’ becomes more and more blatant: Links 1 for Aug. 15, 2025

Posted on by

This site has as it’s mission an attempt to try and explain and demonstrate the nature of the war against humanity at the strategic level. And especially Western civilized humanity and its core Socratic/Aristotelian thought, Christian Values and Jewish approach to law. along with Roman systems of representative government. (Granted a variation of it, but clearly the original model of a Western Republic is pre-emperor Rome)

For the past few decades, at first subtly, tiny changes were made (that kicked up a little fuss, but not enough for any real effort to oppose it) to our civilization and its fundamental principles.

The initial changes allowed for potentially massive effect, but the effects were not really implemented yet. The initial grinding off the details of basic rights set the matrix for a new system to be applied.

While early stages might be things like Pierre Trudeau’s removal, or failure to include property rights in the Canadian constitution, or earlier, PET’s Monitor, communist PM Lester Pearson’s replacement of a meaningful Canadian flag with a red leaf of some kind, a middle stage example which is easy to see would be the precursor to DEI, known then as, “Affirmative Action”. The destructive effect was to obliterate the absolute of the Merit principle and equality before the law, and replace it with what was in truth a political determination of worth. Whatever group was designated as the victim class, with or without justification or accuracy would be placed somewhere on the hierarchy with an advantage over those who had actual merit. Be it from a disciplined life of self sacrifice to achieve abilities and skills, or from raw talent. Affirmative action was the beginning of appearing to fight perceived racism with systemic racism. In the name of anti-racism.

The justification for Affirmative Action had powerful psychological effects and people for the most part went along with it, despite its obvious contradictions. If someone at the time pointed out the logical extension of such policies, or its obvious unfairness, they were beat down with a critical theory attack. Racist, right wing conspiracy nut, etc. ad nauseam.

Covid and the Vaxx mandates managed to wake up something like 20% of the population to the real threat of communism. Granted, not all of that 20% recognized what they saw as communism, but that 20% recognized that the things which had happened to our country where in stark violation of the laws and rights of a “democratic’ (Republic) style state.

Understanding that those specific changes are communist in nature takes some education.

Part of that education is revealing that what people call “hypocrisy” or “Two-tiered justice” is neither thing, but in fact the implementation of a new system of thought altogether. In fact a replacement of Socratic and Aristotelian thought with something quite opposite in many ways. A Platonic/Hegelian/Marxist one.

The destruction of the very concept of an objective reality and the notion of facts with a politically determined set of diktats which can be changed without notice, and mentioning or advocating the previous views is punishable. Mentioning facts is punishable where it contradicts the state narrative.

State narratives are all that is permitted. And they must not just be obeyed, but in the final stages, must be believed.

Orwell’s 1984 illustrates this amazingly well in this scene:

So at one point there is a turn over.

Where we move from a place with an objective reality that represents itself with symbols, to a place where symbols control that reality.

Where we have a history that explains where we are at, and build monuments, museums and write books to help us preserve the facts of who we are, and how we came to be there, to a society where symbols of a totally invented history and pseudo-identities are created and people must accept whatever they mean till they are exchanged for new ones.

UPDATE: I just came across this video which is astonishingly appropriate to this point above:

Let’s call this a dialectically determined society, because the process of the dialectic is used to destroy all that we are, down to a level we are not even conscious of, and all that it is replaced with, even by the tyrants as they replace each fiction with other fictions.

The Religion of Peace.

Global Warming from Western industry but not Chinese.

Safe and effective vaccine injections which are not safe, not effective and not even vaccines.

Mass immigration of people who are anathema to a Western Civilization

mass graves of non-existent Amer-Indian children who never went missing.

The list is very long and have degrees of truth that vary from none at all to a fair amount. But the degree of truth to them is not the point whatsoever.

Their ability to destroy who and what we are is all that counts. Much like what metal the gun is made of is secondary to the fact that it is being used to shoot at you.

This gentleman has figured it out. In fact he has figured out more than most. Im surprised this is even on YouTube. When the video in item 1 below disappears, please leave a comment so we can attempt to restore it.

1. The chaos is intentional and for the purpose of massive change:

2. Afghan Migrant in Sweden not deported after admitting that he raped a teenage girl because he wanted to.

‘I was so horny. I just wanted to have sex!’ — Afghan migrant charged with raping Swedish teen postal worker at knifepoint

The 26-year-old Afghan, a Swedish citizen since 2016, cannot be deported despite admitting to following and raping the 18-year-old at knifepoint

[…]

When questioned, Asghari openly admitted to the crime, saying he had followed the young woman because “she is a girl and she is pretty” and that “my brain was so horny, I just wanted to have sex.” He claimed he had been feeling unwell before and after the rape and had considered suicide.

Asghari is now facing trial for aggravated rape. Due to his Swedish citizenship, he cannot be deported if convicted.

There is a lot to say about this on its own, but in the context of the thesis of this post, we hope the numbers add up for everyone.

3. Canada’s new Minister of Health under Carney is a dialectical masterpiece, operating under several lines of destruction at once.

Here we see a Muslim woman who is clearly at a very unhealthy weight but who is the head of Canada’s health Ministry and therefore a symbol of Canadian health aspirations, talking about another mass line narrative attack, Global Warming. Masterful.

Remember, in a dialectically operated society, symbols come before reality. Changing everything to represent things that never were is to make what Stephen Coughlin calls, “An imposed Pseudo reality”. And the one you must believe in.

“He who controls the past, controls the future. He who controls the present, controls the past”. -Orwell, 1984. This is an incredibly important statement. It describes a staggering amount of the memory holing we see around us and have for decades upon decades. We often refer to the fact that thousands of hours of footage on Nuclear Winter cannot be found anywhere as it was replaced by the Global Warming narrative attack. But it’s an amazing example of narrative memory holing to be replaced with another Maoist mass line narrative. In a rational world it would be enough right then and there for everyone to say, “hold on a sec, this is totally bullish*t. But sadly it’s maybe 1 in 500 that did, and things didn’t go well for those that did as a rule.

4. I wonder how many people have been cancelled or otherwise had their lives made difficult or in the UK actually gone to prison for trying to explain this exact thing about Islamic sentiments and ambition:

5. Part of the mission here, is to both come to understand, and explain, why what we see around us is NOT Hypocrisy, or “Two tiered justice” but in fact the replacement of an objective reality based system with a dialectical, symbolic one. Part of that means destructive lines of action. When you have two seemingly contradictory things taking place at once, it is not hypocrisy if at another level, both things have a common goal. Usually that is destruction of you, your rights, your beliefs, liberties and sense of justice. Generally when both things seem hypocritical based on a rule of law point of view, but in fact are destructive in some way, they are in perfect accord, where the goal is destruction.

Article

The current signs over the highway in Nova Scotia reminded me of this sign which I photographed in September of 2021 on the 417 Queensway in Ottawa

6. This one makes the case rather well.

Here is a man in the UK advising his leftist and Muslim followers to slit the throats of people who told the truth about the Southport slaughter of little girls by a jihadi who was just acquitted of any wrong doing, and makes a remarkable contrast to those in jail for warning others about the dangerous nature of Islam. Again, not a contradiction as both things are destructive, jailing truth-tellers and encouraging and financing jihadis.

The social media post which Lucy Connolly made out of grief and anger upon hearing about the halal slaughtered little girls at a dance party was in no way as inciting as telling people to go out and slice throats.

But that isn’t the point. Total and utter transformation of a truth based society, a merit based society into a totalitarian state of North Korean proportions, where the only authority is the state and the state’s description of truth can and will change like Nuclear Winter to Global Warming whenever it suits the purposes of the state, and again, which are not the purposes of the people who live under it, that, is the point.

Update on the man who broke into a woman’s home and was taken back to his nice hotel by the police

Same tactic, different line of operation: This is, and is not the woods

Posted on by

The following video is by Canadian veteran, Jeff Evily, who we have interviewed before when he was arrested and banned from entering Ottawa for defending the War memorial during the freedom Convoy.

In this video, he demonstrates rather excellently, the exact tactic used during Covid, when certain isles were taped off at Costco, big pharmacies, Walmart, and other areas where you could catch Covid if you brought underwear or gardening supplies, but not if you bought alcohol or marijuana or crowded together in lines to get in to any of those places.

This time, the tactic is applied to the Global Warming mass line narrative attack by implication. Nova Scotia, which is having a slightly wetter than normal summer in fact, has decided not to let you go int the underwear isle or gardening tools section of the forest, but yes, you can go to adjacent areas where you won’t set a fire. Apparently. Because like viruses, arsonists obey signs and don’t infect/ignite places that are taped off.

Jeff from 3 years ago

UPDATE: Tamara Lich offered this:

Charges pressed against Tomio Okamura, leader of the Czech opposition

Posted on by

In the continuing COMINTERN destruction of actual people’s rule, world-wide, the Czech police have now pressed charges against a more or less libertarian political leader. In fact the leader of the actual opposition party in the Czech Republic. Please take note. we must be aware that all leaders of parties in the West who are genuinely seeking to maintain or restore the rule of law, anything that remotely resembles a republic, meaning constitutionally guaranteed rights of the individual along with basic rights like freedom of speech, and freedom of bodily autonomy, are either being assassinated, successfully or otherwise, arrested, or jailed. And where one of those things doesn’t happen, they are probably faking it and are a form of controlled opposition. There are reasons to suspect this is the case in Canada, as one example. Certainly in Ontario and likely the federal government, or as we prefer to think of it, the local branch office of the Communist-International.

In Brazil, they stabbed Bolsonaro before he won the first time with the intention of killing him. The Supreme Court in Brazil then went through some pretty evil machinations to have a convicted felon released from jail, Lula da Silva, who was either COMINTERN or COMINTERN compliant, and made him leader of Brazil despite MASSIVE protests, even though the collective Brazilian aboriginal tribesman along with a Million Brazilians protested in the streets an election they knew was fraudulent. They even had a trucker protest similar to Canada’s but a much larges scale.

Romania, France, United States, and several more countries have either tried assassinating, blackmailing or rigging elections to circumnavigate the actual people living in those polities to impose and implement a communist regime, while using every possible device, dialectical, immigration or anything else they can manage to deracinate the culture and laws of the people as they are or were. In Germany they are really and truly trying to ban the one non-communist party, the AfD from running at all. The one detractor from German counter media has changed his tune on that and now accepts that this is the case.

July 25th: Czech police press charges against leader of far-right opposition SPD party

The Czech police have pressed charges against Tomio Okamura, leader of the far-right opposition Freedom and Direct Democracy (SPD) party, following the investigation into the anti-immigration campaign carried out by the SPD last year.

SPD billboards, seen as racist by many observers, campaigned “against the EU migration pact” depicting a black man with a blood-stained shirt and holding a knife, accompanied by the message “discrepancies in healthcare won’t be solved by ‘surgeons’ from import”.

Okamura is accused of inciting hatred, a crime which carries a penalty of up to three years in prison.

“The police have ended the investigation and submitted the file to the state procurator proposing charges,” state prosecutor for Prague 1 Jan Lelek confirmed in a statement for Czech online news outlet Seznam Zprávy (SZ).

As bne IntelliNews covered earlier this year, the Czech parliament stripped Okamura of his parliamentary immunity following the January police request so he can be interrogated over the SPD’s 2024 summer and autumn billboard campaign ahead of regional and Senate elections in the country.

Okamura has seized the opportunity to portray himself as a victim of the rule of the sitting centre-right government of Petr Fiala, whom he accused of trying to silence him.

(Please note the use of the narrative attack: “Far-right opposition”. Everyone already knows this, but it still must be stated. One of the dialectical-semantic weapons used agianst Western republics or ‘democracies’ was the redefining of terms to force people to accept the communist view of these subjects and actions. And also the moving of goal posts of continuums such that what was in the centre is now “far right violent extremism”. And I do not exaggerate. The Office of the CVE under Obama and Biden in fact did define a violent extremist as anyone who swore an oath to the US constitution as part of an armed service. So they were far right extremists because of their allegiance to classical American and individualist values, and violent extremists because they were prepared and able to use force to defend those values. The current push to expose Obama as treasonous, does not scratch the surface of how treasonous he actually was in intent and actions while in office.)

Once again, there is obviously a communist revolution taking place across all nations that have enjoyed the benefits of Roman and Greek civilization, assisted by the Islamic global jihad. They are extremely close in naming it as such. But even a relatively shallow examination of the nature of communism shows this is the case. We recommend re reading or listening to Orwell’s 1984 for anyone who has not done so since grade school or within the last 5 years. We promise it will be far less abstract when read today than it was when you last tried to make it through that book. The other is Bella Dodd’s School of Darkness where she explains how she and her colleagues created the communist institutions in labour and education and even the Church which explain where we are today, and why organizations that present themselves as being the voice of the worker, in fact opposes worker’s right as they are really just a vector of communist control. For Canadians, that also explains why Justin Trudeau’s social father, Pierre, made being in a union mandatory for the civil service, and made that union’s diktats mandatory for its workers. Ask any civil servants in Canada that you know in the Fed Guv what happens to them if they don’t agree with the union. Also note how every anti-state protest in Canada, from ANTIFA protests against the Freedom Convoy to the endless protests by ‘Palestinians’ show various Canadian civil service union flags, very well documented on this site, and in every manifestation on the streets against Classical Canada and against any individual rights, such as bodily autonomy autonomy. (Except when it comes to abortion. Then they go with the most destructive position and redefine un-born babies as not actually alive and worthy of rights)

Both books are linked to their YouTube audiobook analogues above. It is important to know what communism is and how it operates if you hope to understand the things taking place around you now and nearly everywhere and certainly everywhere this post will be read, with the possible exception of India.

Below are several videos we have translated from the Czech Republic’s opposition leader or about him. Note that it is a very similar thing that happened to Donald Trump or Marine le Penn. Attempts to take them out of the political arena with bogus criminal charges, or ones that are so trivial and ubiquitous that to convict them would mean convicting a sizeable fraction of the population in either country if there was still rule of law.

This would be the reason that they are destroying him. His expose of the EU as a COMINTERN branch office and its real intentions, along with his opposition to the mRNA shots and their mandatory implementation would put him in the crosshairs.

Here he defends himself for putting up a poster against mass immigration to the Czech Republic as designed by the EU and UN, both of which seek destruction of all nation states by this method.

5 months ago, criminally charged by the Czech police:

It would appear that the charges of the 25th are additional ones, or more formal ones of the charges discussed in the videos above.

Carney creates new legislation so in keeping with Trudeau’s communist laws that one wonders if it wasn’t Carney all along

Posted on by

While we believe that Trudeau was a bona fide communist, and was not as vacuous as he appeared on TV oft times, we do think he doesn’t have the philosophical depth to create a series of laws that so expertly destroyed fundamental freedoms one or more at a time without stating the true purpose of those laws.

One of them being C-4 which makes the children the ward of the state and the parents can lose their children or even be jailed if they try and talk their own little boy into waiting till he is old enough to get a tattoo before he gets castrated and otherwise destroyed by synthetic hormones in the name of “trans-affirming-care” or “anti-Conversion therapy”. Truly cynical nomenclature worthy of a Nazi slogan.

In the brief period since mark Carney, Sr. board member of the WEF, and president of two central banks, both of which seem to be actively developing CBDCs, several new pieces of legislation have been introduced that involve naked power grabs of the kind not just never seen before, as other bills under Trudeau’s figurehead primeministership were identical at the philosophical level, but certainly in breadth of scope. Too many to keep accurate track of in fact.

John Carpay is a Canadian lawyer and head of with what is probably the most visible genuine Human Rights law firm in Canada, the JCCF, along with Bath-Sheba van den Berg of course, who defended Helen Grus and many others charged with defying or challenging state narrative attacks on the public.

In this video he explains the current attack on anything which might conceivably mean Canada is a free nation of free peoples.

John carpet though, in our opinion, may be underestimating the danger of CBDCs, and he is not saying it is not dangerous.

We still like this explanation:

New Yorkers pick the Democrat Front runner for Mayor, a Communist Jihadi named Zohran Kwame Mamdani

Posted on by

Clare Lopez offered this explanation of a 2019 Tweet by Mamdani:

Expert on Communist actions in the West, Trevor Loudon gave some background on Mamdani. Remember, the person picked as the Democrat candidate for NYC mayor is usually the person who becomes the mayor, except after Democrats have made the city unliveable and they need it repaired. But Giuliani likely won’t be around or want to do the job a second time.

Here are a couple of RAIR Articles on this man and his background that are well worth a look.

9/11 Forgotten – NYC Poised to Elect Muslim Communist as Mayor as He Crushes Andrew Cuomo in Democratic Primary

Zohran Mamdani’s Family Legacy of Radicalism: Trevor Loudon’s Warning to New York City (Video)

It appears that wealthier New Yorkers actually voted for him in much bigger numbers than the blue collar types did. I wonder if this reflects the people that swallowed the Covid and Vaxx narratives and Global Warming narratives as well.

Screenshot

Concrete proofs Canada is going full totalitarian and surveillance state under Carney

Posted on by

This is not a drill. This is not data points or indicators that the direction appears to be leftward. These are overt laws which obliterate rule of law, the presumption of innocence, and criminality becoming arbitrary and whimsical at the state’s fancy based on dialectical processes rather than what may be true.

1. The first video must be seen in its entirety. Sorry about all the damned commercials. I wonder if Google puts way too many on videos which expose the revolutionary efforts by the COMINTERN Viceroy of Canada in order to get people not to watch it all the way.

I would like to add that although he does intimate it at the end, it should be stressed that what this bill C-2 does is far worse than merely making all procedure that protects privacy disappear. It is that what constitutes criminality itself will become arbitrary and of a dialectical nature. If you oppose the state or state narratives, reasons will be found to make you a criminal, if indeed they don’t simply say that you are an enemy of the people, as they did in the Soviet Union.

Please watch all of this.

2. A superb example of dialectical law:

Labour board upholds firing over ‘white people’ comment

A federal labour board has ruled that Employment Insurance’s call-centre management acted properly when it fired a probationary agent whose on-the-job tirade questioned Black Lives Matter protests and asked coworkers, “When will there be a day to remember white people?”

Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board adjudicator Christopher Rootham said the remarks showed the worker “unsuitable to serve in a diverse public-service workplace committed to equity and respect.”

Although the discussion had no link to her duties, Rootham wrote that behaviour during working hours is part of a probationary review and that dismissal was a “good-faith response.”

The six-month employee launched into her commentary on what a colleague described as a “slow day for calls,” criticising 2020 demonstrations where then-prime minister Justin Trudeau knelt with marchers.

Witnesses recalled her saying Black Lives Matter protesters wanted to erase history by scrapping brands like Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben and insisting that “it’s not like Hitler was walking around killing people.”

Affidavits also recounted her claims that Covid-19 threats were exaggerated, that masks were unnecessary and that media coverage of suspected graves at an indian residential school in Kamloops, B.C., was overblown because the events “happened years ago.”

I guess the joke was on her. There were no graves at all.

3. This is Germany, but its clearly in concert with Canada:

I think we can guess which politicians it is criminal to insult. The current German govt actually PAYS ANTIFA to attack, insult, lie about and otherwise frame AfD supporters as they attempt to make the party itself illegal.

4. Top constitutional lawyer slams Indigenous land acknowledgements as virtue signaling

Indigenous land acknowledgments have increased in Canada since unproven claims that unmarked graves were discovered at former residential schools gained media attention.

(LifeSiteNews) – One of Canada’s top constitutional lawyers gave a blunt assessment regarding his views of so-called Indigenous “land acknowledgements” that have become commonplace in all forms of Canadian society, saying they are nothing more than “hypocritical virtue signaling.”

“Aboriginal land acknowledgements are hypocritical virtue signaling by people who would never ever give away their own home for free to an Aboriginal,” Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) president John Carpay said in a recent video message.

“They like to pretend the land was stolen, but they themselves are not going to give up their own home or land and give that back to an Aboriginal.”

Carpay noted that in his view, if the land is “stolen,” then to “give it back.”

“If you’re not willing to give it back, don’t describe it as stolen land acknowledgements do nothing to help Aboriginals on reserves who are facing poverty and unemployment and high rates of suicide, drug addiction, often very corrupt local governments,” he reasoned.

Indigenous land acknowledgments have become common in Canada and have increased since the unproven claims that unmarked graves have been discovered at former residential schools gained media attention. Indeed, so prevalent that even King Charles III gave one recently while delivering the Throne Speech on behalf of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal government.

John Carpay and his law firm, are at this point the last hope for rule of law, and actual constitutional rights in Canada. But he is wrong in a key aspect of his assertion. In fact, Land Claims are FAR MORE than mere virtue signalling. They are the dialectic narrative attack on Canadians to ensure they feel they have no grounds with which to object to the deracination of their culture, laws, beliefs, reproductive taboos or any other aspect of their identity whatsoever as it is destroyed in part by mass immigration.

The Land Claims narrative attack is to make it clear that Canadians have no claim on Canada and have no more right to be here and determine the laws and culture than say, 60 million Muslims, Africans and Chinese. And this is FAR MORE than BS virtue signalling.

At a Holocaust memorial ceremony that took place a week or so ago after the monument had been vandalized, the first speaker invited to talk to those people who had gathered there was a woman who identified as an Algonquin. It is pretty clear what she is saying to the Jewish community here.

Tomorrow I hope to write up a bit about the foreign operatives who did a needle attack on a Music festival in France.

One might hope it might give the French a little greater understanding of the events of Oct. 7th at another music festival in Israel. But that would not be the actual issue.

Music festivals, and all Western cultural events, certainly things like Christmas Festivals and any other mainstay of Western Civilization will increasingly disappear. The auspices will be public safety, as it is so much collectivist totalitarianism. After Covid and the Vaxx mandates, no one should be arguing with me about that.

But clearly we see the process of encouraging, protecting to the max, even to the extent of not allowing criticism of illegal public gatherings such as Muslims blocking roads with public spectacles of religious ritual behaviour, fully unnecessary by any religious standard but an excellent way to assert dominance. Those acts are protected. But hundreds of people being pricked by needles, or run over at Christmas markets, well those are technically illegal but the results of all this are a foregone conclusion. Western people are not allowed to defend themselves in any meaningful way and deference? forget it.

Our own governments pay invaders to invade.

The land claims bollux is entirely about delegitimizing any argument using what we call, ‘temporal relativism’ (you did this back then so you have no right to object to others doing this same awful thing now even though if it was so awful, why should it be OK now and not then?) against our utter deracination by mass immigration.