The Red pill Blue pill divide widens over Charlie Kirk’s assassination propaganda

Posting has been light or non existent for a few days. This is from a combination of things from lots of work both related and unrelated, and attending events which would normally be something we would post videos from, but in this case, there isn’t enough meat on the bone.

But there is a great deal of material backlogged in my notes. I’ll post at least some of it tonight.

1. Two Pakistani men, a father and son, have been arrested for planting a bomb under a FOX news truck. Now while I have no idea if these men where Muslims, I mean its possible that a couple of Christian men who managed somehow to escape near-slavery in Pakistan and managed to make it to freedom in the USA would want to bomb a FOX News truck, but this feels a lot more like the Islamic version of censorship. Which is actually a lot like the leftist version of censorship that took down Pam Fortune in the Netherlands and Charlie Kirk in the USA, Jair Boslonaro in Brazil, and frankly quite a long list of counter-revolutionary figures in the last quarter century.

2. Enemy Propaganda in Canada continues its Soviet level dialectical narrative attacks on all things counter-revolutionary.

How actual Canadian people, at least in Alberta, feel about Charlie Kirk

Article by John Carpay, one of the few actual human rights lawyers left in Canada:

CARPAY: Outside of the CBC’s echo chamber, everyone is ‘far-right’

When ‘far?right’ means half the country – CBC’s smear net catches conservatives, libertarians, and anyone outside its woke bubble.

When the CBC dislikes a person or an opinion, our taxpayer-funded broadcaster calls it “controversial.” In CBC-speak, “controversial” means conservative, libertarian, religious, traditionalist, classical liberal, or otherwise not in line with woke ideology. For the CBC, there is nothing “controversial” about a man who “identifies” as a woman having an absolute right to enter women’s washrooms and other female spaces. Only those who seek to protect safe spaces for women are “controversial.”

As millions mourn the murder of American conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the CBCdescribes his pro-life and pro-Israel opinions as “controversial.” According to CBC writer Verity Stevenson, Charlie Kirk promoted “some of the far-right’s more extreme ideas.” In her story, Ms. Stevenson secures quotes from academics who describe Kirk’s “far-right” rhetoric as “harmful” and as “hate speech.” As can be expected of any good CBC employee, she reliably fails to quote academics (or anyone, for that matter) who have a different opinion.

Here, the actual agencies such as the MSM who radicalized the man who murdered Charlie Kirk, was “radicalized by the dark corners of the Internet”. We have posted enough little bits from CTV here enough for anyone to know how he and others like him were radicalized. Imagine someone who actually watches this bilge and not just clips on Twitter.

Hopefully this week we can manage top catch up on some of the evidence that points at some components of reality out of the swirling, sucking, eddy of political warfare that has taken over every sector of communications in Canada and across much of the Western world.