Category Archives: West fights back

General elections: Brazil moves to the center-right

Posted on by

A few days ago, I asked a friend of ours, José Atento, who is a speaker of Portuguese, and a watcher of the political situation in Brazil and Portugal, to write up something to help us all understand what happened in the election, and who is this “Tropical Trump” who was stabbed, but won anyway. The letter below is his answer:

(Bold is mine)

Hi Vlad. Here is a summary of the situation in Brazil after today’s election. The situation is very complex and dynamic and the summary does not cover all details. Only a broad vision is provided.

Brazilian right-wing presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro gestures after being stabbed in the stomach during a campaign rally in Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais State, in southern Brazil, on September 6, 2018.
Frontrunner Bolsonaro was attacked with a knife while campaigning — but escaped with just minor injuries, his son said. / AFP PHOTO / Raysa LEITE / RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE – MANDATORY CREDIT “AFP PHOTO /RAYSA LEITE” – NO MARKETING NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS – DISTRIBUTED AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS

The general elections in Brazil took place today (Sunday) and it is fair to say that it has been a tremendous victory for center-to-right parties, which will be majority in the two houses of Congress, and elected most state governors. The socialist Worker’s Party (PT), which have won all elections since 2002 has been relegated to a secondary plane, along with the other leftwing parties associated with it. The coveted and powerful position of president of the republic (remember, Brazil is a presidential system) has not been decided and it will require a second set of vote in three weeks.

Overall, the majority of the population is saying no to socialism.

Concerning the presidential election, Jair Bolsonaro, from the conservative Christian Social Party (PSC), has obtained 47% of the valid votes, whereas Fernando Haddad, from the Worker’s Party (PT), got 28%. Fernando Haddad tried to take advantage of the popularity that former president Luiz “Lula” da Silva still has. However, Lula is not as popular now. He is in jail, accused of bribery, condemned for 9 years behind bars. Lula faces many other judicial processes, and is accused of embezzlement.

Besides, Lula and his team controlled the largest corruption scheme in Brazil’s history, with several other PT officials and parliamentarians either in jail or facing justice. Other important elements of the private sector are also in jail, some of them owners of the largest engineering companies in Brazil. They would go overseas to friendly countries, such as Cuba and Venezuela, and build harbours, subway systems bridges, and a portion of the money would be donated back to PT to finance electoral campaigns. Add to that the disastrous government of PT’s Dilma Roussef. It left the country in recession, with high unemployment and rampant crime.

The attempts to impose gender ideology in the primary and secondary school systems angered the parents in this overwhelmingly Christian country.

Jair Bolsonaro, on the other hand, has been fighting the left, which has controlled Brazil and dragged the country to the gutter. His motto “Brazil above everything, God above all” and his vigorous opposition to socialism and communism has ignited a population tired of the socialist failures of the Worker’s Party government. He wants to open the economy, fight crime and respect the family. He is a nationalist who defends Brazil for the Brazilians. He remains the favourite to win the second round of presidential election.

One should keep in mind that Bolsonaro was stabbed by a left-wing sympathizer early during the campaign and had to undergo two surgeries. He is still convalescing and the only contact with his supporters started last week via short video clips, which cannot be longer than 15 minutes due to medical recommendation.

Today’s election was plagued with the accusation that 16,000 ballot boxes have been tampered with, favoring Haddad. We have to remember that Brazil uses a paperless electronic ballot box, which does not allow recount. Surprise, surprise, it is the same system used in Venezuela. This is cause of worry for the second round and PSC has even notified the Organization of the American States

One important thing for us is that Bolsonaro, if elected, will have majority in the Congress. His future minister of foreign affairs was one of the most tough critics of the Law of Immigration (a subject discussed on VladTepes ), which basically opened Brazil borders in a way that only Justin Trudeau would dream of and fits very well under the UN’s Global Compact for Immigration.

We hope that under Bolsonaro Brazil will modify this law and refuse to be part of the UN’s attempt to destroy our sovereignty. I believe that Eastern European countries have already expressed their intention to leave the agreement.

Brazil has a big problem with drug trafficking exacerbated by the operation of Hezbollah, in the triple border with Paraguay and Argentina and in Venezuela. Bolsonaro promises to be tough on crime.

Bolsonaro is also pro-Israel and very critical to the hate campaign that the Palestinian Authority and Hamas perform to indoctrinate their own people. He promises to move Brazil’s embassy to Jerusalem.

It is not surprising to see Bolsonaro under attack by the globalist media. A series of articles published by the likes of BBC, Foreign Policy, El País have blasted him to the point of calling him a deplorable (sexist, racist, xenophobe, homophobe, misogynist, etc.). Most of the media in Brazil is also against Bolsonaro but the more they beat him, the more he grows. Bolsonaro is the anti-establishment candidate, and, if elected, will be a proud member of the “deplorables international”, ranking shoulder-to-shoulder with the Easter European leaders and with the current US administration.

 

José Atento

Blog Lei Islâmica em Ação

 

 

 

 

In the image, Bolsonaro puts his hands on the injury, moments after being stabbed by a left-wing radical

Interesting two minutes at the Toronto Linda Sarsour event

Posted on by

Link to facebook page for the event: https://www.facebook.com/iCarryTheLight/

On Quebec’s proposed new anti-religious symbol ban

Posted on by

CBC has this video on the issue:

This video is not as hideously pro-islamic or socialist as one may have gotten used to this past decade, although it’s clearly biased against Quebec. But I would like to stick my neck out and predict how I think this will go, when improperly done. And it will be improperly done.

If one is to ban a uniform, you may find out of the gate you get the results that John Robson detailed so well in his video for the Rebel a few years ago.

While his assessment has a lot of merit, summarizing as once you are trying to ban clothes you have already lost, I would like to take a different approach, as well as look at data from other places that have tried this, also improperly.

First, there is the insistence of false moral and ideological equivalence. As Postmodernists have managed to con us all into doing on an hourly basis, we make our comparisons on the wrong level of abstraction. its a clever trick and works very well.

The false level of abstraction of course, is the idea that the problem is religious symbols, and not islam.

As a consequence, the Quebec government like so many others, think they can target islam by banning all religious symbols.

Here is how that is going to go:

Many Sikhs, Hindus, Jews, Christians and possibly other religious folk who live harmoniously in Quebec and very often contribute mightily by operating honest businesses and generally building civilization in a cooperative fashion, may leave for Ontario, New Brunswick, or the United States. But the religious muslims, who’s ambition is total and complete control of the world along with their socialist allies, themselves bent on total destruction of the West and its thought processes, will stay.

The muslims will put into full force a system where each and every time any attempt is made to limit their imposition of islamic customs or sharia law on Quebec, such as writing a ticket for wearing a face cloth, or fining an employee at work, they will take full advantage of the media-leftist government complex in Canada, and will also send out a txt message in a tree fashion, to large numbers of male muslims who hang around mosques waiting for such a signal, who will then riot and damage and sometimes even kill to make damn sure no police or other official will ever dare interfere with their process of Islamification again. ANTIFA of course will hold their own similar riot or join in with the muslims.

At the end of the day the cost of enforcement becomes very high but to save face, like the government of France does, they will continue to enforce a secular culture on a pretend basis, occasionally targeting easy groups like Jews or Christians, while leaving the original but unnamed target alone, Islam.

Belgium did similar things over a decade ago when they tried to ban “religious dress at government offices” to stop all the hijabs and face cloths and then the muslims protested so vigorously the they got an exception to the law, and the law ended up achieving the islamic goal of muslim superiority better than they could have managed themselves.

The fact is:

Islamic religious dress is in fact a uniform. It is an outward sign of commitment to an ideology. An ideology which is by design, non-miscible with Western law and life.

Banning all religious symbols is as stupid and counter-productive as banning all uniforms to try and stop one enemy from attacking you. You will end up hurting those wearing uniforms of allies, while assisting those wearing uniforms of the enemy.

The only way we can stop this problem before it gets to the point where any effective solution would be bloody beyond our ability to cope at this time, is to recognize that islam and leftism are the problems.

That ANTIFA are terrorists, and they must not be allowed to cover their faces when committing vandalism, (which are by definition terrorism, as they do not benefit the aggressor directly but are destructive or violent for a political cause, and therefore are not really criminal, but military and terrorist)

And to apply existing laws, (of which we already have far far too many), to Islamic texts and preachers and arrest them for sedition, hate crimes, and every other thing that islam violates on a minute by minute basis. After all, if our laws were not selectively enforced against liberals, no muslim would ever be allowed in the country to speak at all. Just ask Marc Lebuis of Point de Bascule, (featured in Killing Canada on this subject) where he explains what happens when you take a muslim imam to the HRC for wanting to kill all the Jews and force non-muslims into dhimmitude.

In summary, Quebec’s proposed law will hurt Quebec, every group that is a true contributor to Quebec’s well being and prosperity, and I guarantee will advance the cause of islamic manifest destiny.

The problem is islam, and their partners in revolution, the various factions of communists/leftists who seek the destruction of the West.

And the longer we play games of abstraction to try and pull this thing out of the fire, the more fuel we give the actual enemies to burn us down with.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.