On Quebec’s proposed new anti-religious symbol ban

CBC has this video on the issue:

This video is not as hideously pro-islamic or socialist as one may have gotten used to this past decade, although it’s clearly biased against Quebec. But I would like to stick my neck out and predict how I think this will go, when improperly done. And it will be improperly done.

If one is to ban a uniform, you may find out of the gate you get the results that John Robson detailed so well in his video for the Rebel a few years ago.

While his assessment has a lot of merit, summarizing as once you are trying to ban clothes you have already lost, I would like to take a different approach, as well as look at data from other places that have tried this, also improperly.

First, there is the insistence of false moral and ideological equivalence. As Postmodernists have managed to con us all into doing on an hourly basis, we make our comparisons on the wrong level of abstraction. its a clever trick and works very well.

The false level of abstraction of course, is the idea that the problem is religious symbols, and not islam.

As a consequence, the Quebec government like so many others, think they can target islam by banning all religious symbols.

Here is how that is going to go:

Many Sikhs, Hindus, Jews, Christians and possibly other religious folk who live harmoniously in Quebec and very often contribute mightily by operating honest businesses and generally building civilization in a cooperative fashion, may leave for Ontario, New Brunswick, or the United States. But the religious muslims, who’s ambition is total and complete control of the world along with their socialist allies, themselves bent on total destruction of the West and its thought processes, will stay.

The muslims will put into full force a system where each and every time any attempt is made to limit their imposition of islamic customs or sharia law on Quebec, such as writing a ticket for wearing a face cloth, or fining an employee at work, they will take full advantage of the media-leftist government complex in Canada, and will also send out a txt message in a tree fashion, to large numbers of male muslims who hang around mosques waiting for such a signal, who will then riot and damage and sometimes even kill to make damn sure no police or other official will ever dare interfere with their process of Islamification again. ANTIFA of course will hold their own similar riot or join in with the muslims.

At the end of the day the cost of enforcement becomes very high but to save face, like the government of France does, they will continue to enforce a secular culture on a pretend basis, occasionally targeting easy groups like Jews or Christians, while leaving the original but unnamed target alone, Islam.

Belgium did similar things over a decade ago when they tried to ban “religious dress at government offices” to stop all the hijabs and face cloths and then the muslims protested so vigorously the they got an exception to the law, and the law ended up achieving the islamic goal of muslim superiority better than they could have managed themselves.

The fact is:

Islamic religious dress is in fact a uniform. It is an outward sign of commitment to an ideology. An ideology which is by design, non-miscible with Western law and life.

Banning all religious symbols is as stupid and counter-productive as banning all uniforms to try and stop one enemy from attacking you. You will end up hurting those wearing uniforms of allies, while assisting those wearing uniforms of the enemy.

The only way we can stop this problem before it gets to the point where any effective solution would be bloody beyond our ability to cope at this time, is to recognize that islam and leftism are the problems.

That ANTIFA are terrorists, and they must not be allowed to cover their faces when committing vandalism, (which are by definition terrorism, as they do not benefit the aggressor directly but are destructive or violent for a political cause, and therefore are not really criminal, but military and terrorist)

And to apply existing laws, (of which we already have far far too many), to Islamic texts and preachers and arrest them for sedition, hate crimes, and every other thing that islam violates on a minute by minute basis. After all, if our laws were not selectively enforced against liberals, no muslim would ever be allowed in the country to speak at all. Just ask Marc Lebuis of Point de Bascule, (featured in Killing Canada on this subject) where he explains what happens when you take a muslim imam to the HRC for wanting to kill all the Jews and force non-muslims into dhimmitude.

In summary, Quebec’s proposed law will hurt Quebec, every group that is a true contributor to Quebec’s well being and prosperity, and I guarantee will advance the cause of islamic manifest destiny.

The problem is islam, and their partners in revolution, the various factions of communists/leftists who seek the destruction of the West.

And the longer we play games of abstraction to try and pull this thing out of the fire, the more fuel we give the actual enemies to burn us down with.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.


About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

8 Replies to “On Quebec’s proposed new anti-religious symbol ban”

  1. The Red scarf

    “China: The Roots of Madness (1967) | Full Documentary HQ”
    ClassicMoviesHQ – Published on November 24, 2014

    China: The Roots of Madness is a 1967 Cold War era, made-for-TV documentary film produced by David L. Wolper, written by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Theodore H. White with production cost funded by a donation from John and Paige Curran.The film has been released under Creative Commons license. It won an Emmy Award in the documentary category.

    The film attempts to analyze the Anti-Western sentiment in China from the official American’s perspective, covering 170 years of China’s political history, from Boxer Rebellion of the Qing Dynasty to Red Guards of Cultural Revolution. The film focuses on the power struggle between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China, amid heavy political intervention from Moscow, with Sun Yat-sen, Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Zedong playing the pivotal role at the center stage.

    Theodore H. White – 24:44… 26:33… Professor Earl Swisher… 26:55 Identification of Communist … Communist Rednecks

    • “60th Anniversary: Celebrating The John Birch Society’s Epic Journey” by William F. Jasper – October 5, 2018


      As all of this was happening, Hiss’s communist comrades in the State Department were completing the betrayal of China to Stalin and his communist minion, Mao Tse-tung. U.S. Ambassador to China General Patrick Hurley, who had witnessed the betrayal — and had fought valiantly to stop it — was one of many who raised their voices to warn America of the treason and treachery in the highest levels of our government. The fall of China in 1949, he charged, was the result of a “conspiracy to overthrow the Nationalist Government of China, and to set up in its place a Communist regime — and all this movement was part of, and cannot be separated from, the Communist cell or apparatus that existed at the time in the Government in Washington.”

  2. We just don’t learn from history do we?

    Too late for “Off with your pants!” and to run around like Winnie the Pooh!

    The barbarians are in every aspect of North American society. If this current legislation comes to pass as presented in Quebec, the barbarians will meet you with violence….you just don’t learn.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *