Category Archives: People

Trump and the executive order to restore beauty

Posted on by

For some years now, we have been caught up in the mental gymnastics of trying to understand the relationship between Marxism and postmodernism.

At one level though, it’s extremely simple. Postmodern art is dialectical art.

In other words, it is art that is launched on the public as a weapon to destroy art itself. To deracinate our sense of aesthetic beauty. To show contempt where respect and appreciation was the norm. It is anti-art, art. Like all dialectic attacks on Western Civilization. Take an attribute of classical thought and its expressions, and destroy it with an intersectional line of attack.

Below is Stephen Coughlin’s graph, which I think was taken from a feminist-Marxist think tank showing how they destroy western paradigms with dialectical lines of attack:

Screenshot

(For a complete explanation of that graph, please see this brief by Maj. Stephen Coughlin)

But if I were to make one, I would have spokes that showed how mass line narratives such as:

“Diversity is our strength” was the intersectional line of attack against the well understood and axiomatic, “United we stand, divided we fall”.

“The Religion of Peace” is the intersectional attack on “kill the unbeliever wherever you find him”. etc. etc.ad nauseam.

In the book Explaining Postmodernism (Available as a free audiobook on YouTube) by Steven Hicks, or Human Accomplishment by Charles Murray, Post modernism is explained very well. And in both books it is clear that the purpose of postmodern art is to destroy art.

So it was with a sense of tremendous joy that I became aware of one of President Trump’s lesser known executive orders, and from back in August:

MAKING FEDERAL ARCHITECTURE BEAUTIFUL AGAIN

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Purpose.  The Founders, in line with great societies before them, attached great importance to Federal civic architecture.  They wanted America’s public buildings to inspire the American people and encourage civic virtue.  President George Washington and Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson consciously modeled the most important buildings in Washington, D.C., on the classical architecture of ancient Athens and Rome.  They sought to use classical architecture to visually connect our contemporary Republic with the antecedents of democracy in classical antiquity, reminding citizens not only of their rights but also their responsibilities in maintaining and perpetuating its institutions.

Washington and Jefferson personally oversaw the competitions to design the Capitol Building and the White House.  Under the direction and following the vision of these two Founders, Pierre Charles L’Enfant designed the Nation’s capital as a classical city.  For approximately a century and a half following America’s founding, America’s Federal architecture continued to be characterized by beautiful and beloved buildings of largely, though not exclusively, classical design.  In the 1960s, the Federal Government largely replaced traditional designs for new construction with modernist and brutalist ones.  The Federal architecture that ensued, overseen by the General Services Administration (GSA), was often unpopular with Americans.  The new buildings ranged from the undistinguished to designs even GSA now admits many in the public found unappealing.  

Please read the rest at Whitehouse,gov.

Reading the order shows that the Trump administration has a very clear grasp of exactly what it is doing, and what it is fighting. This is inspiring stuff. A few more paragraphs:

(b)  “Brutalist architecture” means the style of architecture that grew out of the early 20th-century modernist movement that is characterized by a massive and block-like appearance with a rigid geometric style and large-scale use of exposed poured concrete.

(c)  “Classical architecture” means the architectural tradition derived from the forms, principles, and vocabulary of the architecture of Greek and Roman antiquity, and as later developed and expanded upon by such Renaissance architects as Alberti, Brunelleschi, Michelangelo, and Palladio; such Enlightenment masters as Robert Adam, John Soane, and Christopher Wren; such 19th-century architects as Benjamin Henry Latrobe, Robert Mills, and Thomas U. Walter; and such 20th-century practitioners as Julian Abele, Daniel Burnham, Rafael Carmoega, Charles F. McKim, John Russell Pope, Julia Morgan, and the firm of Delano and Aldrich.  Classical architecture encompasses such styles as Neoclassical, Georgian, Federal, Greek Revival, Beaux-Arts, and Art Deco.

(d)  “Deconstructivist architecture” means the style of architecture generally known as “deconstructivism” that emerged during the late 1980s and that features fragmentation, disorder, discontinuity, distortion, skewed geometry, and the appearance of instability.

Understanding that this is not trivial, nor is it a restriction on freedom of expression is critical to the survival of the republic. At a certain point, the symbols we represent an idea with, is what shapes the opinion in the minds of the people exposed to the idea. This is a large part of the leftist plan. To destroy symbols in order to destroy the ideas themselves. But also to replace the symbols with ones which give the same emotional palette to communist ideas. Just look at early Soviet art to get the picture. Nazi art as well. The dignity and beauty it stole from civilization, as well as destroyed by misrepresentation, it granted to itself.

 

 

 

What does ‘controlled opposition’ mean anyway?

Posted on by

This post is for Canadians, and anyone interested in Canada, or anyone in a system of government where leaders are picked using a similar system to Canada, either by intention or in reality.

First, let’s watch this video by Runkle of the Bailey on the Conservative Party legislation on self defence in the home against intruders.

The punch line is the CPC is pretending to enforce laws to allow defence of the self and the home while keeping it exactly the same.

Then we add this. Remember, one of the communist plays is to remove all power from parents over Children, unless you want to kill them before birth, and give all that power to the state.

That power would extend to the point where a state agent, say a socialist teacher, could persuade your child that they are born in the wrong body, but their body can be adjusted to be more like how they imagine themselves to be, and embark them on a course of radical surgeries and drugs that will mutilate and sterilize them for life no matter what else they ever do. The Conservatives accelerated a bill that would have the parents made criminal if they attempted to even suggest to their own young children that they delayed such a set of procedures till they were old enough to buy a beer, vote or get a pack of cigarettes.

Here is video of Parliament where the Conservatives ask to skip all the damn hullabaloo around bill C-4 and just pass it already without all that ceremonial reading of it, and pesky voting and so on.

My Google searches used to turn up an excellent US Library of Congress summary of the Canadian bill C-4 which was dialectically named, ‘Anti-conversion therapy’ legislation when in fact it was as conversion therapy as you can possibly get. Tricking people into becoming a simulacrum of the other sex and criminalizing parents who tried to stop it. It seems Google won’t give mt that result anymore. But Brave’s built in search engine will. 

Overall, the actions of the Conservative Party increasingly appear to be those of, not people who wish the restoration of something like a Republic.

Probably most obviously would be how the Liberal of Canada is bringing in Millions of people very alien to Canadian values and culture, and the Conservative Party seems to want to build them houses, rather than deport them, and restore immigration to something that works in Canadian interests, rather than for the ‘migrants’ at the expense of Canadian interests. Not to mention they seem to want to build these illegal immigrants homes at public expense.

So maybe we all need to think about what controlled opposition means to each of us, and decide if the Conservative Party fits.

If it does, some of us had better form a new party, or infiltrate and take over the Conservative one, and make it Conservative again.

MCPCA? MaCoPaCoAg? Make the Conservative Party Conservative again? Probably not possible. The few people in the party that tried got sidelined.

Remember the Conservative MP, Derrick Sloan, who held the largest attended and watched press conference in Canadian history during Covid? Kicked out of the party and not re elected.

This video was after he had already been removed from the party:

There are a few solid conservatives within the Conservative Party though. After the recent federal election, we published some speeches they made that were stellar in their unabashedly anti-communist content and clear awareness of the situation Canada is in now.

Those are all new members. Leslyn Lewis was always a solid Canadian Conservative and always had the courage to say out loud what needs to be done. She also was the only Conservative MP that I am aware of, to support the Freedom Convoy. She also very rightly suggested Canada leave the United Nations.

So maybe there is a feint hope for a political solution from the CPC. But not from the top.

 

Glyphosates, ‘chem-trails’? and why are dogs dying so young now?

Posted on by

After attending the Rally in the Valley on August 24th where I think three of the speakers focused on the aerial spraying of a herbicide and desiccant on plants and consequent health and environmental catastrophes, it seemed like a good idea to contact maybe the World’s best expert who is willing to speak frankly about them, MIT Ph.D Dr. Stephanie Seneff.

RAIR has the synopsis of the interview here

This interview was recorded on September 18th, and published in the last few hours.

The women who spoke on Glyphosates at the Rally in the Valley in August are below. If you are not familiar with Glyphosates and their large scale use on our foods and lands, I would ask that you invest a little time to watch these videos. I know there is more than enough horror to go around and far far more than we are even likely capable of handling in any rational way. (Wait till you see the clip of the Mayor of Dearborn!) But this is one of those issues that we need to keep some awareness of because to a limited degree we can actually make choices which have some positive effects on our own personal health. In other words, in the micro, we can mitigate this a little, while the other issues we deal with are on a scale that often feels pretty hopeless.

I am hoping for some comments from some doctors and biologists who I know read this site on the matter. Even if they can’t point at glyphosates, maybe they can point at the increased incidence of the various diseases that are being attributed to it.

We have posted these three women’s speeches before, but now, with the new Stephanie Seneff interview, it makes for a nice package which you may want to forward to anyone who doesn’t know about the use of this substance, or has any influence on its use that can stop it.

Charity Parisian:

Donna Burns

Dr. Mary O’Connor’s speech from Rally in the Valley, Pembroke On. Aug. 24, 2025

Posted on by

The following is the talk by Dr. Mary O’Connor who was one of the best examples of how the various colleges and professional organizations overseeing medical staff have become communist narrative enforcement mechanisms during and since Covid.

With Dr. O’Connor, it wasn’t mere inconvenience, but actual thuggery. They hired men to go to her offices, force their way in, and try and steal patient files. Presumably to know who had received a vaxx exception on medical grounds. This would likely be in order to find ways of screwing them over as well.

For a more complete explanation of Dr. Marys’s story please see this article at RAIR Foundation. 

Below is a comprehensive interview we did with Dr. O’Connor when all this started. In fact this is the first public description of what the state aparatus, federal and provincial did to Dr. O’Connor for the act of practicing honest medicine in Ottawa.

The date of the interview was on or before August of 2023. It should be noted that this interview received over 2 million views and that, on Rumble. In case anyone thinks no one cares about this or similar cases. Even on YouTube that would be large. But on Rumble that would count as viral.

Important update on the Helen Grus sentencing hearings as of last week

Posted on by

Here are two important video interviews on the Helen Grus hearings. If you don’t know who that is, or what this is about, please read the stories at RAIR Foundation or at Donald Best’s own site.

The first video is a rare description of the seriousness of the legal malfeasance on the part of the hearings officer and the process as a whole by Bath Sheba Van Den Berg, the defence attorney for Helen Grus. Again, if you read back on this case you can see that this entire hearing was a beard for what it really was, a theatrical trial intended to make sure no one in any position of authority or influence ever challenges a state narrative, especially when that narrative is deadly dangerous and central to the purpose of what we believe was the communist revolution of 2020.

Second, a thorough description of the current state of the case by retired Toronto Police detective, Donald Best.

Donald has pointed out specifics in this case which make the real nature of it unambiguous. The fact that is is now said out loud and on the record that: “police officers now need permission to investigate crimes that have ‘political and societal ramifications’ – or where the suspects are public officials” pretty much makes clear the fundamental shift in the nature of the way the state operates.

This is no joke, and no abstraction. It is not even plotting an extrapolation into the future. This is showing how trials and hearings are to have the outcomes decided. Not based on truth or what is good for the public from a reality or rights based set of principles, but from a foundation of state narratives. This is the overt shift from a republic type of state to a communist one.

”

Please see a lot more crucial details at RAIR Foundation.

 

Tweet from State Representative, Nick Freitas: member of the Virginia House of Delegates on the assassination of Charlie Kirk

Posted on by

Full text below:

Nick Freitas
@NickJFreitas
I am told that as a state representative this is the moment where I’m supposed to express my heartfelt condolences and then stand in solidarity with those on the other side of the aisle as we condemn political violence and stand unified as one people.

But we aren’t “one people” are we?

The truth is we haven’t been for some time now, and there is really no point in pretending anymore, if there ever was.

We are two very different peoples. We may occupy the same piece of geography, but that is where the similarities seem to abruptly end.

I convinced myself for a long time that whenever the left called me a racist, a bigot, a sexist, a fascist, a “threat to democracy” for even the most innocent of disagreements, that it was simply hyperbolic rhetoric done for effect.

And now the “effect” is a widow and two orphaned children, because the left couldn’t bear the thought of a peaceful man debating them and winning.

I don’t think they realize it yet, but murdering Charlie is going to be remembered as the day where we finally woke up to what this fight really is.

It’s not a civil dispute among fellow countrymen. It’s a war between diametrically opposed worldviews which cannot peacefully coexist with one another. One side will win, and one side will lose.

Charlie tried to win that fight through argumentation, through discussion, through peaceful resolution of differences.

And the other side murdered him.

Not because he was “extreme” or “inciting violence” or any other hyperbolic slur they hurled at him. They murdered him because he was effective. Because he was unafraid. Because he inspired others and made them feel like they had a voice, that they were not alone. And he did it at the very institutions which have fomented so much hatred toward conservatives.

I don’t want to “stand in solidarity” with the other side of the aisle. I want to defeat you. I want to defeat the godless ideology that kills babies in the womb, sterilizes confused children, turns our cities into cesspools of degeneracy and lawlessness…and that murdered Charlie Kirk.

Social media is aflame right now with leftist celebration of Charlie’s death.

I wonder if any among them understand what has just happened. If there is a Yamamoto somewhere in their midst warning, that all they have done is awoken a sleeping giant.

I doubt it. I think they gave up such introspection and self-awareness long ago.

I don’t know exactly what will happen next. I just know that it won’t be the same as what has happened in the past.

There will be thoughts and prayers…Charlie would have wanted prayers. Not for himself but for those left behind and for the country that he loved.

But then there will be a reckoning.

My Christian faith requires me to love my enemies and pray for those who curse me. It does not require me to stand idly by in the midst of savagery and barbarism…quite the opposite.

So every time I feel tired, every time I feel discouraged or overwhelmed, I am going to watch the video of a good man being murdered in Utah…I will force myself to watch it…and then I will return to the work of destroying the evil ideology responsible for that and so much more.

Rest with God Charlie, your fight is over.

Ours is just beginning.

Alexander Dugin and the assassination of Charlie Kirk

Posted on by

There are already lots of hypothesis floating around the net about who murdered Charlie Kirk. Lots of them of course are the eternal patsy, ‘The Jews’.

Given the professionalism, so to speak, of this assassination, most of them include the idea that the killer was hired, then did his job, escaped and a patsy will be found for the murder much like what happened so many believe, with the JFK assassination.

In conversations with the Baron of Gates of Vienna, the most likely suspect for a patsy could be a tranny, or a dreadlocked black male since the story about the murder of a stunning Ukrainian refugee on a train recently was peaking at the time, and by a black male with dreadlocks.

When The Baron woke up and checked his mail the first thing he saw was an article about the killing by the architect of someone who wants to create civil war in America, Alexander Dugin himself.

An excerpt:

Alexander Dugin presents Charlie Kirk’s assassination as a turning point, with MAGA uniting in rage, liberals celebrating, Ukraine rejoicing, and America sliding towards civil war.

After confirmation of Charlie Kirk’s death (no one survives such a thing), America exploded. What is surprising is that it happened on both sides. Trump and the MAGA movement feel genuine pain and wild fury. Musk called the Democratic Party terrorists. Everyone in MAGA forgot their contradictions and instantly united.

On the other side, liberals cannot restrain their joy and elation. Idiot Dowds was apparently fired from MSNBC, yet when a proposal was made in Congress to honor Kirk’s memory with a prayer, the Democrats howled loudly: “NOOOO!” Liberal networks cannot hold back their delight. Their elder comrades urge them not to be too open in confessing their feelings. This could end badly. Yet they are not listening. They are triumphant. After all, a conservative, a traditionalist, and a Christian was killed. We remember how such people are labeled by their opponents. That label makes their murder seem justified.

This looks very much like the beginning of a civil war.

The Democratic Party is America’s Ukraine. Or the reverse.

So who is Alexander Dugin? Here is a RAIR Article on him from around a year ago, and below, an interview with expert on communism and especially on the actual individual agents and agencies promoting communism in the West, Trevor Loudon:

Looking at a few historical assassins and considering the likelihood of the murderer of Charlie Kirk as being amongst them ideologically

Posted on by

1. Sirhan Sirhan

Sirhan Bishara Sirhan (/s??r?h??n/;[2]Arabic: ????? ????? ????? Sir??n Biš?ra Sir??n; born March 19, 1944) is a Palestinian-Jordanian man who assassinated Senator Robert F. Kennedy, younger brother of American president John F. Kennedy and a candidate for the Democratic nomination in the 1968 United States presidential election, on June 5, 1968. Kennedy died the next day at the Good Samaritan Hospital of Los Angeles. On April 17, 1969, Sirhan was convicted of first-degree murder, among other charges, and subsequently sentenced to death by gas chamber. In 1972, this was commuted to a life sentence in the aftermath of Furman v. Georgia. The circumstances surrounding the attack, which took place five years after President Kennedy’s assassination, have led to numerous conspiracy theories.

In 1989, Sirhan told British journalist David Frost: “My only connection with Robert Kennedy was his sole support of Israel and his deliberate attempt to send those 50 fighter jets to Israel to obviously do harm to the Palestinians.”[3] Some scholars believe that the assassination was the first major incident of political violence in the United States stemming from the Israeli–Palestinian conflict (Sirhan carried out the attack on the first anniversary of the 1967 Arab–Israeli War), though it occurred at a time when the American public was overwhelmingly focused on the Vietnam War.[4]

[…] Motives

Sirhan’s diary

A motive cited for Sirhan’s actions is the Middle East conflict.[40] After his arrest, Sirhan said, “I can explain it. I did it for my country”.[40] Sirhan believed that he was deliberately betrayed by Kennedy’s support for Israel in the June 1967 Six-Day War,[41] which had begun exactly one year before the date of the assassination. During a search of Sirhan’s apartment after his arrest, a spiral-bound notebook was found containing a diary entry that demonstrated that his anger had gradually fixated on Kennedy, who had promised to send 50 fighter jets to Israel if elected president.[citation needed] Sirhan’s journal entry of May 18, 1968, read: “My determination to eliminate R.F.K. is becoming the more and more [sic] of an unshakable obsession … Kennedy must die before June 5th”.[40] They found other notebooks and diary entries expressing his growing rage at Kennedy; his journals also contained many aphorisms that were thought to be his version of “free writing“. He wrote in support of communism: “Long live Communism … I firmly support the communist cause and its people … American capitalism will fall and give way to the worker’s dictatorship”.[42]

2. Carlos the Jackal

In this Spanish name, the first or paternal surname is Ramírez and the second or maternal family name is Sánchez.

Ilich Ramírez Sánchez (Spanish: [i?lit?ra?mi?es?sant?es]; born 12 October 1949), also known as Carlos the Jackal (Spanish: Carlos el Chacal) or simply Carlos, is a Venezuelan convict who conducted a series of assassinations and terrorist bombings from 1973 to 1985. A committed Marxist–Leninist, he was one of the most notorious political terrorists of his era,[1][2][3] protected and supported by the Stasi and the KGB.[4] After several bungled bombings, Carlos led the 1975 raid on the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) headquarters in Vienna, during which three people were killed. He and five others demanded a plane and flew with a number of hostages to Libya.

[…] In 2001, after converting to Islam,[48] Carlos married his lawyer, Isabelle Coutant-Peyre, in a Muslim ceremony, although he was still married to his second wife.[49]

3. Lee Harvey Oswald

Lee Harvey Oswald (October 18, 1939 – November 24, 1963) was a U.S. Marine veteran who assassinated John F. Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States, on November 22, 1963.

Oswald was placed in juvenile detention at age 12 for truancy, during which he was assessed by a psychiatrist as “emotionally disturbed” due to a lack of normal family life. He attended 12 schools in his youth, quitting repeatedly, and at age 17 he joined the Marines, where he was court-martialed twice and jailed. In 1959, he was discharged from active duty into the Marine Corps Reserve, then flew to Europe and defected to the Soviet Union. He lived in Minsk, married a Russian woman named Marina, and had a daughter. In June 1962, he returned to the United States with his wife, and eventually settled in Dallas, Texas, where their second daughter was born.

Oswald shot and killed Kennedy on November 22, 1963, from a sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository as Kennedy traveled by motorcade through Dealey Plaza in Dallas. About 45 minutes after assassinating Kennedy, Oswald murdered Dallas police officer J. D. Tippit on a local street. He then slipped into a movie theater, where he was arrested for Tippit’s murder. Oswald was charged with the assassination of Kennedy, but he denied responsibility for the killing, claiming that he was a “patsy” (a fall guy). Two days later, Oswald himself was murdered by local nightclub owner Jack Ruby on live television in the basement of Dallas Police Headquarters.

[…] Though Oswald had trouble spelling in his youth[11] and may have had a “reading-spelling disability“,[23] he read voraciously. By age 15, he considered himself a socialist. According to his diary, “I was looking for a key to my environment, and then I discovered socialist literature. I had to dig for my books in the back dusty shelves of libraries.” At 16, he wrote to the Socialist Party of America for information on their Young People’s Socialist League, saying he had been studying socialist principles for “well over fifteen months”.[24]

[…] Almost immediately after arriving, Oswald informed his Intourist guide of his desire to become a Soviet citizen. When asked why by the various Soviet officials he encountered — all of whom, by Oswald’s account, found his wish incomprehensible — he said that he was a communist, and gave what he described in his diary as “vauge [sic] answers about ‘Great Soviet Union'”.[53] On October 21, the day his visa was due to expire, he was told that his citizenship application had been refused, and that he had to leave the Soviet Union that evening. Distraught, Oswald inflicted a minor but bloody wound to his left wrist in his hotel room bathtub soon before his Intourist guide was due to arrive to escort him from the country, according to his diary because he wished to kill himself in a way that would shock her.[53] Delaying Oswald’s departure because of his self-inflicted injury, the Soviets kept him in a Moscow hospital under psychiatric observation for a week, until October 28, 1959.[55]

Anyone want to take a bet that the assassin of Charlie Kirk would fit right in on this list? Instead of being a Palestinian communist, or a Muslim-communist, perhaps he was a tranny communist. But I have a pretty good idea which adjective will fit.

Charlie Kirk shot and killed by sniper with single shot high powered rifle

Posted on by

This is EXTREMELY fresh. More when we know more.

May God keep and protect Charlie Kirk. One of the most effective defenders of genuine human rights left in the Western world.

  • Reuters reports that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck during an event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. He appears to have fallen from his chair after being hit. A suspect is in custody, and law enforcement agencies including the FBI and ATF are investigating.Reuters

  • Associated Press (AP) confirms that Kirk is in critical condition and that the incident occurred under a tent during a campus event. A suspect is in custody.AP News

  • ABC News reports that former President Trump reacted by urging people to pray for Kirk following the shooting.ABC News

  • Summary

    • Who: Charlie Kirk — conservative activist and co-founder of Turning Point USA

    • What happened: Shot in the neck during a public speaking event at Utah Valley University

    • Where: Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah

    • When: September 10, 2025

    • Status: Kirk is in critical condition; suspect in custody; federal agencies are investigating

    Here’s what the verified reporting says:

    • The shooting suspect is described as an older man, likely in his late 50s to 60s, wearing a worker’s uniform. No more specific details have been publicly released about his age or political beliefs.
      The GuardianWikipedia

UPDATE: News is coming n that Charlie Kirk has passed away. The suspicion is assassination, and not some nut that did this quasi randomly.

This is what Maj. (Ret.) Coughlin is talking about

Single shot from high powered rifle from a distance.

Charlie has passed away. This is now confirmed.

Did Hamas do this?

Alex Berenson:

UPDATE/URGENT: CHARLIE KIRK HAS BEEN ASSASSINATED

Charles James Kirk was 31, married, with two children. He was born on Oct. 13, 1993 and shot to death while speaking at an event at Utah Valley University. His assassin remains at large, and a person detained after the shooting has been released.

Cause and effect?

He’s HARD to spot, but if you look on the top highest roof there is a man running in this video.

https://twitter.com/j0sh3ooo/status/1965894523177128154

Canada spraying toxins over our forests and near our cities with an eerie echo of Vaxx narrative enforcement against detractors

Posted on by

There was last Sunday, a gathering of the freedom minded in Pembroke Ontario as happens now annually in August called, “Rally in the Valley.

Amongst the speakers was Josh Alexander’s dad, Matt Alexander who gave an amazing talk about how communist the school board is. Communist both in his words and mine. He was fired from a long term teaching job for refusing to celebrate and affirm sexual identities to THREE YEAR OLDS.

Also Dr. David Speicher, virologist and microbiologist who’s discoveries about the mRNA shots are now peer reveiwed and should have a real impact on court cases if there is even a vestigial hint of real justice or law left in Canada.

Many other speakers were there as well and all will be published as time permits.

But among them were three activist women who spoke on the matter of spraying Glysophate on Canadian forests, and are actively attempting to stop it.

RAIR Foundation has an excellent summary of the talks here with related videos. Including two with Stephanie Seneff, probably the world’s leading expert in glyphosate that isn’t actually selling or making the stuff.

This link is to a NYT Article from August of 2024. It is behind a paywall but maybe we can get away with a couple of short exerpts that will make the point that the exact tactics and thought process behind banning counter-narrative science and speech that took place during Covid has been taking place over glyphosate, and still is.

[…] Doctors at the Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital Center in Moncton, the largest city in the province of New Brunswick, Canada, zeroed in on an exceedingly rare condition — Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, caused by prions, misfolding proteins in the brain — as the most likely culprit. 

[…] Laurie’s Creutzfeldt-Jakob test had come back negative.

[…] Laurie Beatty was just one of many local residents who had gone to Marrero’s office exhibiting similar, inexplicable symptoms of neurological decline — more than 20 in the previous four years.

[…] According to P.H.A.C. scientists, both the number of undiagnosable patients and, more important, their ages were “unprecedented at the national and provincial levels.” They called it the “New Brunswick neurological syndrome of unknown etiology.” 

[…] The Canadian Institutes of Health Research offered the province $5 million to help fund a two-year clinical investigation.

But then something changed. A month later, on the afternoon of May 6, 2021, an email from the provincial health department began to circulate saying that all currently scheduled meetings would be “paused” until provincial researchers “had the time to delve more deeply into existing data.” Meetings that had been planned months in advance were wiped from the calendar. Field experts and neurologists were left waiting on Zoom links that never came. “There was a stop, suddenly, abruptly, with no apparent explanation,” says Marrero, who called the decision “unusual by any standards.”

Things grew even murkier 10 days later, when Marrero says he got a call on his cellphone from Dr. Hanan Smadi, the province’s acting lead epidemiologist, telling him to stop reporting potential new cases to the provincial authorities. Marrero was appalled. The number of patients in the cluster — at the time 48, eight dead — was continuing to rise. According to Marrero, when he asked where the request was coming from, Smadi told him, “It comes from higher up.”

Do not report new cases. Pretty much exactly like the instructions on vaxx damage. Not just to the mRNA, but in general, doctors are extremely discouraged from reporting any ill effects of any vaccines for a very long time now. At least in Canada.

Below, the speakers from the Pembroke rally, August 24th 2025

Below, an interview with Stephanie Seneff and Dr. Mercola on the dangers of glyphosate to the health of the environment and human beings.

More of the talks from the Pembroke Rally in the valley to come soon.

 

Game Changing peer review on Covid vaxx contamination may mean new court cases with better outcomes: Dr. David Speicher virologist/microbiologist at Pembroke, Rally in the Valley

Posted on by

You may need to sit down and relax a bit for this one. Dr. Speicher has a serious speech impediment. But the importance of his work, and the importance of what he has to say makes it very worth the time and patience required.

RAIR Foundation has an excellent synopsis of this talk by Dr. Speicher in Pembroke, just this past Sunday.

In essense, David announced that a pre-print that had been widely cited in various courts showing actual DNA contamination (maybe or maybe it was deliberately put there. Hard to believe something that high tech that does that exact damage was an accident) in the ‘vaccines’, had now been peer reviewed and scheduled for publication this week.

This slam dunks all previous objections to this scientific evidence on the basis that it had not been “peer reviewed”. A frankly ludicrous criteria anyway from the point of view of actual logic. What we used to call, argumentum ad verecundiam, or deference to authority but with no real basis in logic or evidence. Mind you I get that Peer review isn’t exactly like that. But since various medical journals admitted to publishing BS reports on Hydroxychloroquine (the lancet etc.) and since several US university professors managed to get several utterly ludicrous made up papers published in peer reviewed journals just because they sprinkled them with Marxist terminology, peer review should not be the criteria. But since it is, this is big news. Please watch and share.

A couple of related items. How they fit in here, is an unfinished jigsaw puzzle.

Breaking: Independent Doctors Praise HHS for Rescinding COVID Shots Emergency Use Authorization

IMA doctors celebrate HHS and FDA’s decision to revoke emergency use authorization for COVID-19 mRNA shots, calling it the first step in reckoning with the damage caused by forced mandates.

“This experimental shot was forced upon workers, parents, and schoolchildren with the threat of destroying their lives if they didn’t comply. But in reality, it’s the shot itself that has destroyed lives. This is the beginning of the reckoning for the tremendous damage inflicted on Americans by forced mRNA mandates.” – Dr. Joseph Varon

As a national coalition of physicians, healthcare providers, and medical researchers, IMA doctors today applauded the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the FDA for revoking the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the COVID-19 mRNA shots, thereby nullifying all COVID shot mandates around the nation.

“Understand, the mRNA mandates have been a healthcare disaster, the full implications of which we’re just now beginning to experience,” said Dr. Joseph Varon, IMA President and Chief Medical Officer. “This experimental shot was forced upon workers, parents, and schoolchildren with the threat of destroying their lives if they didn’t comply. But in reality, it’s the shot itself that has destroyed lives. Today’s actions by the FDA are a much-needed return to sanity and the beginning of a reckoning for those who pushed these disastrous, anti-freedom mandates.”

July 18 2025:

‘NO JAB, NO JOB’: Globe & Mail enforces vaccine mandate while touting equity

And now, paediatricians are suing the CDC over childhood vaccines. Related, but not directly concerning the mRNA shots