Trevor Loudon details the Duginist attack on the West via many of our favorite Russian and Chinese ops

Previously, we posted an interview with Trevor Loudon on Alexander Dugan, the Russian, and actually formerly dialectical engineer, now operating various lines of Operation against the West, such as MAGA Communism.

It was basically a point form interview, but an excellent introduction to the basics. If you haven’t seen it, you can watch it here.

Below is a more recent and much more detailed interview on the same subject and may I say, it is fascinating.

Mark Levin on Tucker Carlson’s propaganda efforts and promotion of Duginist narrative attacks on Western thought

The underlying philosophy of Carlson is my estimate, not Levin’s. Mark Levin gives the evidence of what Carlson and many of his guests consistently are promoting. We think the video below this one explains exactly what he is doing and why they are doing it.

Below is an interview with Trevor Loudon, probably the most informed of exactly who is who, in terms of communist subversives and activists in the West and particularly in the United States. If you listen to this interview which was done in July of 2024, meaningfully ahead of many of these propaganda efforts by Carlson, it may give a really clear view of exactly what he is doing and why. Tucker Carlson interviewed Alexander Dugin on at least one occasion (in April 2024) and gave him a prominent platform.

New Alex Berenson post on Tucker Carlson could be evidence of Alexander Dugin at work via Carlson

For those of you who have not seen the interview RAIR Foundation did with expert on Communist agents in the West, Trevor Loudon, here it is again.

The bottom line on it is that there is a Russian dialectical engineer who fabricated a plan to inject the anti-woke MAGA movement in the US and elsewhere, with a kind of Stalinist, Hitlerian racist brand of communism as a counter to the woke feminist sort of communism we all suffer under now..

This of course would be a classical dialectic maneuver. And a pretty effective one.

Today, Alex Berenson, who has appeared on Tucker’s show on FOX many times, and in fact, Tucker was the only large microphone willing to listen to counter-narrative truths on the vaccines, is discussing Tucker’s recent interview with the Nazi apologist and historical revisionist, Darryl Cooper.

Reading the article, one cannot help but be reminded of the interview above with Trevor. The attempt to use Stalin/Nazi communism against woke feminized marxism is quite clear with Tucker’s guest.

It might be related that Tucker Carlson also interviewed Alexander Dugin himself, as well as Valdmimir Putin.

Now a journalist should offer a voice to influential people from the other side of the narrative. This is the job of journalism. And in the last decade or two, we have seen our own media devolve into enemy propaganda, and even criminalize truth that runs counter to state narratives instead of providing information that may help a free people come to determine their own truths.

But there is a line between letting a state enemy explain himself, and celebrating those enemies and enemy views.

The Tweet, now redacted, below is from Tucker’s guest, Cooper:

Cooper tweet Nazis better than woke

Quoting Berenson’s article:

“…Which is why it hurt to hear Tucker playing footsie on his incredibly popular podcast this week with Darryl Cooper, a historian who is a Nazi apologist and – at best – walks to the edge of Holocaust denial.

To take a recent example, Cooper posted on X that the Nazi occupation of Paris was “infinitely preferable” to the (admittedly idiotic and offensive) opening ceremony of the Olympics in July. The Nazi occupation of Paris led to over 70,000 French Jews being sent to gas chambers. (Cooper later deleted the post.)

This week, Tucker posted a two-hour long interview with Cooper in which Cooper called Winston Churchill the “chief villain” of World War 2, arguing that Churchill forced the war by rejecting Hitler’s overtures for peace in 1940.”

The rest of the article in our opinion is a fairly average and even amateur look at US military adventurism since WWII.

For instance the claim that WWII was the good war and Vietnam was the bad one.

In our view, any war against encroaching communism is a good war. The bad part was that the US stopped right when they could have taken Vietnam back from the Chinese communists and lberated it all for the Vietnamese. And having interviewed many Vietnamese Canadians, and even recently here in Ottawa I know they feel the same way. They wish the Americans had finished the job.

Korea even more so.

I remember having dinner with a friend at a restaurant in Montreal. The restaurant, as is so common now, was polluted with TV screens all over the walls.

I remember stopping eating at one point to stare at an old episode of MASH. A show I enjoyed as a kid when it was on, but now I was seething with anger. “Hawkeye”, the cool, flippant, witty anti-establishment anti-war doctor who’s moral superiority reeked off the screens like a crowd of 1980s businessmen in an elevator drenched in Polo, was pretty much nothing but a communist apologist. A Tokyo Rose, trying to demoralize American efforts to free the North Koreans as well as stop them from taking South Korea and putting it under a regime too awful for Western minds to even imagine.

So let me help with that:

Part II:

“We have the leader, we have the army, and we have the party” speaking about the conquest of the South Koreans which they call, “reunification”. Which of ocurse means under the communist revolutionary system.

Part III:

“If you have a like, philosophical dialectic Marxist problem then  you can go to the philosopher library and ask the sort of philosopher God…”

In a way, the videos above are just a kind of ‘What if Hawkeye Pearce was on the other side mocking the North Koreans instead’.

As bone chilling as they are, videos about the truth of the NORK gulags, and how one gets into them are, for example, if you tore a page from a magazine that had a photo of Dear Leader in it, (and all magazines do), and you rolled a cigarette with that piece of paper, you would go to a gulag for life, your children would also be in for life if you had any in the camps, and your grandchildren. Disrepsecting the leader, unlike what happened to the VICE guys, leads to THREE GENERATIONS in slave labour camps. The women are of course sex slaves to the guards untiil they get pregnant. Then they are hung till dead.

So suddenly M*A*S*H doesn’t seem as funny. It seems like the kind of enemy propaganda that has brought the West to where it is now.

And Alex Berenson maybe unaware that he is exposing Carlson’s Duginist efforts, if indeed that is what is going on, but the net effect may be the same.

We know our governments are lying to us to enslave us. OK we know that. But reacting to everything as if the opposite is the truth is equally enslaving. Not to mention just plain lazy.

What we should have learned during Covid was to use our own sense of logic, reason and true science to establish if not the truth, at least what isn’t shown to be truthful. Instead, many of those we feel have awakened are simply reflexively oppositional. And our enemies use that against us as well.

 

Important: Interview with Trevor Loudon on Russian communist philosopher and “Putin’s brain”, Alexander Dugin

A lot to say about this. First of all, it will annoy and frustrate many of our regular readers. This is not the intention. A fuller understanding of the forces at work in the world is our intention.

The RAIR article on this video can be seen here and is a solid representation of the interviewee’s meaning and intentions.

This article is our own specific examination of this material, and an attempt to put it into the greater context of the materials we use to understand the complex nature of the information battle-space which commands our attention, and forms our views of events.

A few notes in terms of Trevor’s statements on the state of the war between Russia and Ukraine: it is hard to believe that anyone that we would get to read, actually KNOWS what is taking place. This site tends to rely on this particular analyst for information on the state of the war between Russia and Ukraine as he has proven to be reliable consistently in terms of locations, wounded and dead and advancement or retreat of forces for either side of the conflict. Therefore, we tend to look at the claims of casualties in the following interview with uncertainty as to their accuracy. Not to diminish Trevor’s interview in any way whatsoever, and perhaps he does have insider knowledge on the war statistics, But that is not the focus of this piece. Alexander Dugin is, and his dialectic of MAGA Communism.

Trevor’s statement of who is best to run the world is entirely correct.

Because the USA has enjoyed total global naval dominance for some time now, the entire world has gotten richer, more peaceful and more advanced.

This is because pirates and hostile nations can no longer threaten international trade on the oceans. And where people are not doing as well as other places is usually because of the dominant philosophy of that region, and usually some form of leftism.

The problem with US global hegemony is that the USA is rapidly devolving into a communist state. And in many ways, already is.

Concerning Alexander Dugin though, this is Trevor’s direct area of expertise. And we have little doubts that he is in the bullseye on this one.

Check this Twitter thread by Stephen Coughlin on a related matter.

Full text:

There’s the old adage that you cannot tell your friend that his wife’s cheating or that his baby’s ugly and keep the friendship. The same thing for people who bit too hard and too long on favored active measures. But there you have it, actually the graphic below. It follows classic Russian Active Measures efforts. Note the four levels of activity. 1. At the top of the AM food chain is a Russian government service like the GRU or FSB. They NEVER engage in direct contact with their assets. They create the entities that do.

2. Entities like RIAC, Strategic Culture, and Global Research are sponsored and staffed by a Russian government service.

These are the entities that make contact with their operatives who are recruited because they’re disgruntled, fired, bruised egos, down on their luck, etc.

3. Then you have Russian media like RTV and Sputnik interview the operatives along favorable lines to establish them as voices.

4. And finally, you have pseudo-populists blast the disinformation into target audiences to normalize the information while sensationalizing it.

Stephen indicates above what organizations are knowingly or unknowingly enacting the, let’s call it the Dugin Dialectic, intended to mobilize the anti-woke patriots against the woke communism we are now all aware of, for the purpose of creating “a more masculine, Stalinist communism” or as it is called in the US, “MAGA Communism.” yes, all will be explained in the video. But those who follow Stephen Coughlin’s work or James Lindsay or TIK History will know that dialectics in its simplest form is about smashing together opposite concepts in order to destroy both. We see that with the Trans movement in spades. A male or female that undergoes surgery becomes a monster, not the other sex. This is the real intention. MAGA Communism can be seen the same way. A dialectic created by Dugin to destroy the MAGA movement in order to create a communist state using the people we refer to as MAGA by appealing to their contempt of, let’s call it left, or ‘woke’ communism.

To explain the terms “left communism” and “right communism,” let’s look at chapters 3 to 5 of Postmodernism Explained by Stephen Hicks. This book is available free as an audio book on YouTube fortunately. 

You can skip to this segment for a brief look at left Vs. right collectivism, although his excellent look at Nazism and the state of Germany before Hitler’s rise to power is later on in the book and is truly an excellent read/listen.

One can think of pre-WWII Germany this way.

Picture a triangle that is 40 feet high and with the bottom two corners 2 mm apart. From even a short distance away, it would look like a straight line. The bottom left is Soviet or international communism. The bottom right corner is national socialism. The differences are Lilliputian to the people observing from the top of the triangle. We can call those classical liberals, or most of us reading this site. People who believe in a republic where the state power is limited and dedicated to protecting the rights of the individual. The bottom two points of the triangle are different in determining how collectivism will be sorted out and the nature of the details of how the state power will operate, (which is absolute in both cases). They called National Socialism “Right wing” because it allowed for some minimal private control of the means of production. But it was still far left by the standards of an individualist oriented person or society.

The immediate pre-Nazi years in Germany saw street battles between ANTIFA acting for the international socialists, and the Brown Shirts acting for the National Socialists. But when the Brownshirts won those battles, the ANTIFA had no problems changing uniforms and joining the Nazis as both factions wanted to destroy the individualists at the top of the triangle. Again, that is all of us reading this site, generally speaking.

Another way of looking at this triangle might be say, how Islam would view itself compared to Catholicism V Protestantism. Some of Europe’s most bitter wars was fought between these two groups yet they would seem identical in all ways that matter to Islam.

With an understanding of dialectics, Trevor’s thesis in this video makes poetic sense. Communist thought constantly creates opposing groups or uses existing groups and makes them oppose each other for the purpose of destroying the existing order (along with both groups) and moving the culture and society to the left. (Again, meaning more state control.)

To be clear, the left means more government control and power, and less individual rights, and ultimately no individualism at all. Communism will not stop until we are all dead, certainly in one way or another such as spiritually, culturally and in terms of identity, and even actually physically dead, or, we are for all intents and purposes, a kind of insect that clones itself and like aphids, is as related to all other aphids as it is to its own direct progeny, and living and believing whatever narratives the COMINTERN demands we accept that day.

The more International term for what could also be called The Dugin Dialectic, is “National Bolshevism”. What the Christchurch Mosque shooter claimed was his affiliation. And it does dovetail with the interview we did with Brad Johnson in 2019 explaining the motives the New Zealand self described National Bolshevik had when he did his attack. While Johnson focuses on his retaliatory intention against the Islamic mass murder and conquest of the Balkans, and all of his claims are clearly true, there is another layer to the Christchurch attacker’s motives. And that is his Duginist influence.

Loudon explains that the symbol of the Dugin movement is the Black Sun. The banner of National Bolshevism. This is also one of the insignias of the Nazi Ukrainian military unit, the Azov battalion, although their use of the symbol is more Nazi than Duganist one can bet, seeing as how they are fighting Russia.

Here is a section of the cover page of the Christchurch mosque shooter’s manifesto. The Black Sun is clearly at the centre of his graphic.

Screenshot

Here is the interview with Trevor Loudon on Dugin and his movement to usurp the patriot MAGA movement as an agent for communism:

 

The only other element I wanted to add to this was teh Stephen Coughlin session with Sam Dubé from a month or so ago. This is a 3 hour plus presentation by Maj. Coughlin but taken with these other materials offers a pretty large and complete tapestry of understanding of the matrix we live in now. It is we think, sufficient to see the plays as they happen and before they happen ,as opposed to stressing over apparent contradictions or inability to recognize the thing inside the wrapper because the wrapper claims to be something other than what is really inside. In other words, the names for things is generally to sell you on the thing itself, which is dialectically opposite to the name.

Think, ‘Trans-affirming care” for ‘the state plans to sterilize and neuter your child and it is a crime if you try and stop it’ as one example.

Looking forward to any thoughts and comments on this interview and thank you all for checking out this site.