Socialist French politicians determined to spread the ‘benefits’ of Islamic mass migration across all of France
Category Archives: Islam
Poland: Miriam Shaded for Fronda.pl: Zero tolerance for extremism and Islam must be outlawed
An original Translation by Ava Lon with much thanks!
From this Polish language News site:
Are rapes carried out by immigrants in Germany and the bombings in Western Europe going to continue indefinitely? What to do to halt this vicious cycle of violence fueled by Islamist fanatics? We talk about it with Miriam Shaded, social activist and president of the Foundation Esther.
Only in the last few days in Germany, there has been more of rapes carried out by Islamic immigrants. Is this phenomenon going to further escalate with time?
If Germany will keep the same immigration policy that they did so far, this issue will obviously increasingly escalate. Today, Muslims in Europe are unpunished. Rapes are unpunished. The perpetrators get caught, judged, but then are released into the wild. Women who have been raped do not receive justice. I haven’t noticed however the governments in Western Europe, reacting to their grievance.
Q.Where is this immigrant aggression against European women coming from?
A. As I mentioned many times before, Islam condones rape of women, that have been “taken into possession,” he condones rape of infidels and those women who do not dress like a Muslim. The more Muslims arrive to Europe and the bigger consent to their behavior and to their promotion of hatred against women, the more rapes will occur.
Q. What to do to somehow stop or stem the wave of those rapes?
A. I think first of all you have to change the policy,the law simply has to be applied, and punishment for the perpetrators of this type of crime should be increased. Unfortunately, the situation is bad. In Sweden for example, every three minutes a Swedish woman is raped, and everything goes in that direction, and those statistics will continue to be this high, also in Germany and other European countries. At the moment, when it comes to risk of rape, Sweden is in the third place in the world. We can see clearly, where the policy of multi-culti and Islamization is leading.
Q.So there’s a simple correlation – the greater the passivity of the authorities and tolerance towards crime, the greater the escalation …
A. Yes. It’s exactly like that.
Q. One thing are the immigrant attacks against the local population, but there is also a terrorist threat. French Prime Minister recently predicted that future attacks in this country are inevitable. What can Europe do, while it’s being consumed by fire more and more?
A. First of all, you need to identify who the enemy is and why it comes to this type of event. I keep saying that the enemy is the teaching of Islam. There are parts in the Koran saying that any Muslim who kills an infidel, or commits a terrorist attack will receive the greatest reward in heaven and that he is more important than any other Muslim. This is the root cause of the problem and as long as Europe doesn’t realize it, until they don’t realize that every pious Muslim, who strongly believes in the teachings of Muhammad, is a threat, until Europe won’t be able to handle this problem.
Q. What concrete action can be taken against this threat?
A. We should take appropriate steps to outlaw Islam. We need to defend ourselves against attacks that are happening and the war that is already underway. It is a war against the infidels. We have to clarify who is the enemy we are fighting against. Finally, we must open our eyes and start acting adequately to the situation.
Q. Is there any hope for countries such as Germany or France, where the Islamic problem is very far gone? We can still say “No” to Islam, but can Germans and French still do the same?
A.They need to gradually start the process. First they should begin with the most radical imams operating in these countries. They need to deport everyone who have committed any crime. Gradually, they should deal with this using existing law, and after a while they switch to more radical methods.
Q. Methods that would pull out this root from which all those events are sprouting, namely the Islamic religion?
A. Yes, but first they have to deal with the most radical groups. Germany and France should also introduce rules that would cause deportation of entire families in connection with the crimes committed.
Q. Bottom line: all hope for Western Europe is contained in the words “Zero Tolerance”?
A. Yes exactly. There is hope. There is still a lot more of us than Muslims in Europe, and it seems to me that at this moment we still have a very good chance, if in fact we apply the principle of zero tolerance and if we really implement it. If the policy of multi-culti and political correctness continues, Europe will fall, and we will lose another countries, like we have already lost Sweden.
Thank you very much for the interview
[Translator’s note below]
Here’s wiki about that girl:
Miriam Shaded (born June 29, 1986, Warsaw) – is a Polish entrepreneur, human rights activist and critic of Islam. She is the founder and president of the Estera Foundation tasked with bringing the Christian refugees from Syria to Poland.
Miriam Shaded was born into a Polish-Syrian family in Warsaw as the youngest of seven siblings. Her mother is Polish. Her father, Moner Shaded, was born in Syria.[1] He is a pastor of a Presbyterian church in Warsaw.[2]
Ms. Shaded studied evangelical theology and works in IT projects.
{UPDATE]
Perfect Child made a comment under this post reproduced in part below:
Cultural Marxists successfully destroy right of freedom of association with “anti-discrimination” in Norway
A Norwegian hairdresser who has a clear understanding of Islam and its values, was fined 10,000 Kroner (About $2000.00 Cdn.) Monday, September 12 2016 for denying service to a woman in a muslim head cloth.
The hairdresser, Merete Hodne, who has a shop in Byrne SW Norway, refused service for the exact reasons a Jewish person may wish to refuse service to someone in a Nazi uniform. In fact that was her defense. And it is a reasonable and certainly accurate defense.
“To me, the hijab is an extreme political symbol. I don’t feel good when I see people wearing a hijab. They came in and asked what it would cost to get hair highlights and I said that I do not accept people like them and that they should go to another stylist and then they left again,” Hodne said.
If we decide Nazism is bad because of its fanatical degree of racial, and socialist -ideological purity, and consequent desire to exterminate those who represent anything different or impede Nazi manifest destiny, then Islam is every bit as bad or worse, and the uniform of the Muslim may as well have the twin lightning strikes of the SS.
At least the Nazis liked Music and art. They stole it rather than destroyed it, which means they valued it.
Slowly but surely, Frankfurt School descendants have been replacing natural and obvious individual rights with phony collective ones, using the language of human rights to do so.
We have here a jurisprudence level proof of that in Norway, although it happens everywhere now, even if new faux legal mechanisms like Canada’s “Human Rights Commissions” have to be inserted to circumnavigate real rights. Like the right to an attorney for example.
Already there have been several cases where a Muslim women applied for a job as a hairdresser, or in a hairdressing studio, only to appear at work someday after getting the job in a full head-cloth, fired for basically being antithetical to the nature of the work, not to mention being deceptive in the job application, and then suing the employer. Variations of this tactic are being waged across the Western world by muslims in fact, and in Canada as well such as the UPS suit.
That was a particularly good one as the employer was placed between what should be illegal anti-discrimination rules and actual valid safety regulations at the work place. In that case, women who wore long loose flowing garments at a UPS facility were told that it violated Ontario’s safety laws for working on ladders. They sued, and they received an out of court settlement. Which means they won. Policies will change to suit muslims, since you can not, not hire them because they insist on dressing in an unsafe manner.
The women, all devout Muslims, lost their jobs in 2005 because they refused to hike their skirts above the knee over their long pants.
They argued that Islam requires them to be fully covered for modesty and alleged discrimination on the basis of religion and gender.
UPS said the ankle-length skirts were a safety hazard as workers climb ladders up to six metres high. Only “a gap in the process” allowed the women to work at UPS for up to two years without being told their clothing posed a risk, a UPS manager previously told the tribunal.
Yes, they were wearing long pants. This was more a political matter than one of modesty. Like most of Islam is, such as the Burkini issue. A uniform rather than any religious desire to cover up at the beach.
VladTepesBlog has articles on the UPS case. Searching Google for it will give more detailed accounts.
In this UK example, a muslim woman who wears a head-cloth that covers all her hair in typical muslim fashion, was refused a job at a London hair salon and successfully sued for discrimination.
In practical terms, this would be like a basketball team refusing to hire a guy with no arms and then the team losing a law suit for discrimination against the disabled.
In this 2007 case, a Muslim showed up for a trial day, a day in which it was to be determined if she would get the job or not, and was told that the “funky punky urban” nature of the Salon meant that employees would have to have that kind of haircut and show their hair.
Needless to say, she was told her head-cloth was a deal breaker and was not given the job. She sued for over a year’s worth of the owner’s salary and never worked an hour there.
This case deserves a little thought.
The woman was being sued for “religious discrimination” although at no point did she tell the muslima what to believe. She owner explained that a woman in a baseball cap or cowboy hat also would have been denied the job for obvious reasons.
As there was no interference with religious belief this is defacto not about religious belief.
This is about dhimmitude. About a Muslim’s right to trample all over natural and liberal law. About a muslim’s right to attach any activity they want to their religious belief and claim that it is discrimination, not only to prevent them from doing any activity which can be seen as Islamic, such as slaughtering sheep in the streets of big cities like Paris, but even much much more harsh examples as we see in cities across England where police refuse to interfere with giant muslim rape and sex slave gangs for fear of being branded a racist.
If a women in a cowboy hat claimed to be a cultural or native Texan, and claimed the cowboy hat was her necessary show of belonging to her native or adopted culture, no court would take her case or certainly she would never win an anti-discrimination suit.
This is about Islamic supremacy, not human rights. There is no right to display of religious belief uber alles. Just ask the Christian stewardesses who have been told they cannot wear a cross on some airlines while their muslim coworkers wear a hijab with no questions asked.
The pernicious nature of this judgment is that it has been decided for all people now in the UK that wearing a cross is not a religious requirement, while wearing muslim uniforms is one.
This is both not true, there is no requirement for muslims to dress a certain way other than as part of the hijra to islamify an area. (This would be advancing sharia domination but there is no specific requirement to cover hair) and pernicious as it means the court has taken a role for itself which so far steps over its role in a free society as to be the casus belli of French and American revolutions.
The Norwegian hair salon owner took the brave step of actually using her natural right of freedom of association, instead of any work-around to deny having a Muslim on staff or as a client. This was a very brave stance. Most of us submit to the Marxist-sharia matrix being created for us by using some mealy mouthed work around on these issues to temporarily get the effect we want by claiming some other issue.
In Canada, Muslims have no problem exercising that right and the provincial and federal governments in Canada even pay for it.
Anyone wishing to contribute to Merete Hodne, the Norwegian hairdresser’s legal appeal fund, and she is appealing, please pay pal to: co********@***il.com
or transfer funds to:
account no# is 33351044107. Vipps 41516033
The Hajj – Czech Style
Humour is the best medicine. It is also the best weapon against bullies, totalitarians, or anyone who takes themselves too seriously. Perhaps that is why humour is one of the first things curtailed when freedom of speech is threatened.
We have seen various comedians in the US lament how Political Correctness is preventing them from performing on college campuses.
We have seen Canadian comedians fined thousands of dollars for telling a politically incorrect joke.
We have seen German comedians charged and threatened with extradition to Turkey for authoring a humorous poem about Recep Erdo?an.
We know we are not far from the days when Socialist Regimes on the wrong side of the Iron Curtain would routinely jail people for telling jokes…
Well, some of us know…
Perhaps those who lived behind the Iron Curtain remember it better than most of us. Perhaps that is why they cherish their Freedom of Speech and why they use humour to ensure it does not become as eroded as it has become in much of The West.
And Czechs do love their humour. It is therefore not surprising that Dr. Martin Konvicka, a brave patriot who is fighting to preserve his cultural heritage – and his freedom of speech – and his organization IMK (Iniciativa Martina Konvicky) have turned to humour to deliver their message.
And deliver it they did!
On August 21st, Czechs mark the anniversary of the invasion of Czechoslovakia by the Soviet Union of and the rest of their Warsaw Pact ‘allies’. This invasion had ended the liberalization of Czechoslovakia, called Prague Spring (after which the Arab Spring freedom movement was named), and was opposed by the vast majority of the population. Yet, when it became clear that the invaders were going to succeed in rolling back the progress towards liberalism and that hard socialism would indeed be imposed, many people had started licking the heels of their oppressors in order to improve their social status.
Now, Europe is experiencing a very different type of an invasion: millions of young, strong, able-bodied Muslims are flooding in, falsely claiming to be fleeing war, and imposing Sharia restrictions on the Freedom of Speech through threats of violence and massacres should the local governments refuse to impose them. And there is absolute proof that these people are not poor refugees fleeing war: some of the ones who had already been granted asylum in Europe – and living off of government subsidies – are also holidaying in their countries of origin.
Dr. Konvicka and IMK took the opportunity to draw parallels between the two invasions: the invasion of Czechoslovakia by their socialist brothers on the one hand and the Muslim invasion on the other. And the anniversary of the Warsaw Pact occupation was the perfect occasion!
As you can see from the videos above, it was a fun skit, people were enjoying it, except for the few who disagreed with the message – and who were not afraid to say so…which they would presumably be if they had thought this really was ISIS. Despite all of this evidence, Czech and International media corporations have universally reported panic, injuries and havoc…
And that is why you have to go to the blogosphere to see what had actually happened.
Following this street theatre, Dr. Konvicka was kind enough to grant this interview:
As you can see, humour is an effective tool to use against totalitarians of all stripes (or stars).
After the skit, many ‘Progressive’ politicians demanded an investigation into how Dr. Konvicka had managed to get a permit to stage this skit, calling for the bureaucrat who had granted it to be fired and Mr. Konvicka to be charged with something. Anything! Spreading false news, perhaps? (Would this not apply even more to the mainstream media?)
Well, there is still some sanity in Czech and the investigation had concluded just last week and found that everything was fine, and nobody has to get fired or charged with anything. Even more sanity: a judge has just dismissed all charges against the protesters who had carried gallows during last year’s anti-migrant demonstrations.
And Dr. Konvicka is far from being done. To mark the 15th anniversary of the Islamic attack on the Twin Towers on 9/11, he held a demonstration in front of the Saudi Arabian Embassy in Prague:
The event took place on the 11th of September, 2016, in front of the Saudi Arabian Embassy in Prague, from 2 pm until it had been disbanded about 30 minutes later.
The large sign behind Dr. Konvicka, hanging on the Saudi Embassy fence, has a delightful little rhyme:
HE WHO LIVES
WITH A LITTLE GIRL
IN MY BOOK, HE IS A
PEDOPHILE
Dr. Konvicka was not the only one to speak at this demonstration. Beata Radosa, a former Muslima who explained that she used to believe that a hijab would keep her modesty and protect her from sexual harassment. When wearing the hijab did not protect her from harassment by Muslim men, she began to loose her faith and eventually left Islam. Now, she is an activist and a blogger. Her site (in Czech) is called Women Against Islam.
In her above-linked post, she points out that the Magister’s office warned them against using the port-a-potty to represent the Ka’aba…even though this was not specified in the permit application. This can only bring us to one conclusion: in the minds of the Magister’s office bureaucrats, the Ka’aba and a port-a-potty are closely related.
And, she writes, the Port-a-Ka’aba was such a danger to public safety that a whole squad of police in riot gear had to come and monitor the situation.
Martin Vitek was the third speaker and he pointed out some negative aspects of Islam and how they are connected to Saudi Arabia.
Then came the street theatre, until, that is, uniformed police officers pulled the plug on it and heavily armoured police officers arrived to let everyone know they are willing to use force on unarmed citizens if they don’t obey the order fast enough. Photos of the armoured police dispersing the citizens are at this Czech language site.
The lesson of the day? ‘Piss Christ’ is art, ‘Dung Madonna’ is art, but ‘Port-a-Ka’aba’ is hate speech. And the Czech Republic, despite being one of the most enlightened societies, is perfectly willing to use physical force to curb speech it does not like.
Czechs are, however a tenacious peoples. (Is it still allowed to say that or is that now racist?) Dr. Konvicka and IMK are planning more activities: on September 17, 2016, and on November 17, 2016.
Stay tuned, dear readers, for what is coming next!
Brian Lilley on the many faces of Trudeau
Get the Gaviscon before you watch this
Diversity can be a source of strength. Not just a source of weakness”.
Next time the Liberals should run a Golden Retriever for leader. Every bit as good looking but smarter and definitely more loyal.
Cats killed and tortured in the Fedasil center
An original translation by Ava Lon with much thanks.
From this French language Website:
By NADIA LALLEMANT Published Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:43 – updated Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:44
The culprits, two young Afghans were expelled.
The abuse of stray cats by two young Afghans, who lived in the center Fedasil in Bovigny (Gouvy) scandalized the team of the center and the communal college of Gouvy, warned of these barbaric acts.
“A tabby kitten, two months old, was found in the center, in a sad state,” said a staff member. “His jaw was broken and he had a nasal septum deviation. We phoned the county so veterinary expenses would be taken care of.”
Shocked by these heinous acts, the municipal college has agreed to pay the vet. “The former director, who now works part-time, decided to adopt it,” says the employee. “The kitten is doing better and better, even if he still has difficulty eating.”
Two other cats couldn’t be saved. They were killed by two torturers. “The incident occurred in the context of an adversarial relationship between the two young men and a lady of another nationality,” said the deputy director. “They attacked the stray cats that the lady was feeding. The relationship to animals varies from one culture to another. These reprehensible acts were committed despite raising awareness in respect of the animals provided by the team.”
The two Afghans were expelled from the center by the police in the area Famenne Ardennes. An investigation has been opened. Hearings are underway. “These facts are shocking and absolutely regrettable,” laments the Mayor of Gouvy Claude Leruse. “It is important to make them understand that we do not tolerate such acts here. That said, there are not only asylum seekers -perhaps disturbed- and from a different culture, who abuse animals. Recently, while checking for social housing after the departure of tenants, three kittens were found locked in the house. They were dying of hunger and thirst. ”
[This is the real meaning of “multiculturalism”. Radically different sets of core values. Ed]
Leftism and Islam, ideological Siamese twins
One of the subjects that must be revisited every now and then; how Islam and Leftism can be cooperative, when they (on the surface only) appear to be diametrically opposed to each other.
In previous articles on this site, attempts have been made to demonstrate why
It is actually a natural alliance. A congruous pairing that has not gone unnoticed by leaders in both communities. Notoriously, Carlos the Jackal (a Venezuelan convert to Islam) wrote to President Obama from prison that only “…a coalition of Marxists and Islamists…” could defeat the United States.lov
It is not a stretch to draw parallels between their respective belief systems and thought patterns.
Not only are these ideological bedfellows both enemies of freedom, they are also equally hard wired for conclusion-based reasoning versus reason-based conclusions.
This must not be overlooked or undervalued.
In the Soviet Union (and other communist territories) any science that did not seek to prove a predetermined conclusion of Marxist thought, was punished with jail, torture or death. The same is equally true in Islamic nations and commensurate with the degree of Islamic adherence.
Socialism has shifted in a similar direction. Canada shows a growing intolerance of anything that contradicts the culturally Marxist narrative, even criminalizing it in degrees. An excellent example of this is the installation of the Human Rights Commission; a group whose power is growing exponentially and will soon likely be in a position to deliver harsher penalties for those who exercise their “right” to free speech.
One of the finest documentaries on intelligence and heredity is actually about canines. Sooner or later someone is going to point out that the mechanism for heredity in Darwinian evolution is exactly the same for all mammals (if not for all living things) and this film will likely be banned. But, for the moment, it is allowed as it just about dogs.
Please note, that in this documentary they specifically point out that the work being done by the Russian scientist was illegal as he was applying Darwinian principles. This is forbidden in communist nations. The acceptable substitute is “Lysenkoism” which allows for ludicrous ideas that conclude that wheat will grow in Siberia because communism requires it to do so.
DOGS DECODED from Antoan Hlebarov on Vimeo.
This documentary deals in depth with the different races of dogs and how each race has distinct and measurably different attributes, from docility to intelligence, which are specific to races and heritable.
This brings me to the inspiration for this post.
James Watson is a world class, Nobel prize winning, history-making scientist who played a significant role in the discovery of the double helix. This discovery propelled not only modern medicine, but the science of genetics and sociobiology. It was quite possibly the single, most important discovery in medical and biological history.
It should be noted that he won a real Nobel Prize, not the fake ones like Arafat, Carter and Obama.
Today, he was scheduled to speak at NYU in a “…departmental lecture series honoring scientists who have made powerful contributions to science…”, however, because of factually-based comments he made in 2007 regarding the link between IQ and ethnicity, he has been uninvited.
This means, that the Left equates recognizing and identifying patterns of IQ with declarations of the quality or value of individuals within races. And therefore, it cannot be allowed to be known that one group has a higher IQ than another.
One may not say that East Asians have a higher IQ (generally speaking) than sub-Saharan Africans. Conversely (and ridiculously) it seems perfectly acceptable to acknowledge that black people are better at most, if not all sports than, say, the Inuit.
The “politically correct left” openly accepts the facts of evolution if it means they can browbeat Christians who believe in Creationism. But they reject results of real science, which contradict the Marxist doctrines about equality of humans, or any science (for that matter) that might contradict pre-set conclusions denying sexual dimorphism in Humans.
As an aside, it is worth mentioning that the process one employs is as important as the raw intelligence possessed by an individual. A person of average IQ (90-115) who has access to factual information and understands the principles of logic and reasoning, will achieve vastly better results than a person of high IQ (140-159) who exercises bad reasoning.
In fact, in the scenario of the “high IQ/bad reasoning”, this individual has the potential to be downright dangerous. Leaving a trail of blood, destruction, and reversal of progress in their wake. History shows this to be consistently true in such examples as Hitler, Stalin and (of course) Mohammed.
The natural tendency for most people who encounter ideas they don’t like is to dismiss the source as “an idiot”. Those who profess ideas that they do like are lionized as “geniuses”.
But the fact is that many dangerous people were also brilliant. Conversely, many highly accomplished people were of average IQ. In all cases, it is process that makes all the difference.
Alas, Cultural Marxists have determined for all us, that which is acceptable to believe and that which is not. Science will be falsified, and scientists will be forced to lend their authority to indoctrinating the Islamic/Marxist narrative rather than do science. Thus proliferating and cementing conclusion-based reasoning.
Much like Islam,where Al-Azhar will not allow the teaching of philosophy as learning to reason may threaten faith.
Eeyore for VladTepesBlog
With special thanks to Ilona Szilágyi for the edit and rewrite.
Swiss pro-gun lobby, Pro Tell, “Putsched out”
An original translation by Ava Lon with much thanks.
From the Swiss news site, 24 Hours:
The chairmanship of Pro Tell is gutted.
Swiss President Willy Pfund denounced a coup within the association Pro Tell, the gun lobby. He resigned with immediate effect.
Pro Tell defines itself as “the company for a liberal law on weapons.” Its voice weighs in about each policy on weapons. But there is now fire on the top, writes the Tages-Anzeiger in its edition of 12 September.
Its chairman Willy Pfund, 77, resigned Wednesday with immediate effect “for personal reasons”, said Pro Tell Friday. He’ll be temporarily replaced by the vice-president Werner Hohler, until the General Assembly in early 2017 will be able to appoint a new president.
An autocratic management style
The president’s departure does not unfold in serenity, as shown in his email dated August 29 sent to the presidency. Willy Pfund denounces a decision that day that suspends him from office with immediate effect due to a deemed autocratic management style and lack of communication.
The president described the process as a “putsch contrary to the statutes and disrespectful” to the person and work for Pro Tell. “I am upset. Trust is broken in every respect. ”
[…]
Schengen in the viewfinder
Tell Pro does not want to comment on the resignation of its chairman. “We agreed to remain silent,” said the interim president Werner Hohler. This departure will change nothing to the organization. “We will continue in the future to fight for a liberal law concerning arms.”
Pro Tell focuses on the next big battle ahead and particularly close to its heart: the tightening of legislation to come to Switzerland in the wake of what is being prepared in Brussels.
The lobby of 8500 strong, and many federations, could fight the Schengen agreement if the Commission were to require Bern that all gun owners in Switzerland submit to regular inspections. Pro Tell doesn’t want that. (Nxp)
Related:
Also from 24 Hours Switzerland:
The European Union wants to disarm Switzerland
Switzerland: Brussels will toughen its laws on firearms, including introducing psychological and medical tests for holders.
The EU wants [Switzerland] to tighten its laws on firearms. The first sketches of Directive 91/477 forced Simonetta Sommaruga [Swiss Federal Councelor, a socialist] to visit Brussels in mid-June, to plead for Swiss law be allowed to keep the service weapon at home. [Switzerland in NOT part of the EU]
If this derogation is accepted for now, it will be accompanied by many other obligations, such as psychological and medical tests, said the Basler Zeitung in its issue of August 24.
It is supposed to demonstrate that gun owners are not a danger to society and must be supervised. [do you see the contradiction? they are safe, but must be closely watched] Therefore 133,000 people will be compelled to do that: members of shooting clubs but also hunters, collectors or those who possess weapons without being part of a society.
The anti-terrorist law in the European Union already requires gun owners to pass such tests every five years.
Fear of referendum
Switzerland, a member of the Schengen area, is committed to automatically apply European law. Berne will therefore have to adapt its legislation, which could be the subject of a referendum. If not, the vote could result in the late-agreement Schengen-Dublin.
[the shengen and Dublin agreement was apparently signed by the Swiss]
It is to avoid this disaster scenario that Simonetta Sommaruga’s services were activated in June in Brussels for the service weapons to be excluded from the directive. The other obligations will also make the Swiss cringe.
[…]
The Fass 57 threatened [Swiss army riffle]
The terrorist attacks that shook Europe in recent years explain this tougher legislation, but the European Union has had to recognize that none of them had been committed by legally purchased and possessed weapons.
Switzerland could be obligated to destroy hundreds of thousands of weapons and neutralize them. The EU has in his sights rifles with magazines with over 20 rounds and guns that stores more than 10. The assault rifle 57 is particularly threatened with its original magazine of 24 cartridges.
The Directive is currently being processed by Brussels. But it is clear that if it were to pass as is, anyone past active service or is not a member of a shooting club, no longer will have the right to own a firearm. (Nxp)
(Created: 24/08/2016, 10:09)
Justin Trudeau priorities.
Of course its impossible to know what is in a man’s mind and heart. But as Daniel Greenfield brilliantly wrote, its easy to see where his passion is as opposed to what his obligatory duties are.
So what did Canada’s Prime Minister do for 911?
Published on September 11 2016, there is a 3 paragraph press release concerning 911 which says nothing of substance. A speech writer’s hollow pot boiler. If there is a video of him saying it, I am unaware of it. As 911 was a “personal day” for PM Trudeau it was likely written for auto release earlier.
Ottawa, Ontario
11 September 2016
The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today issued the following statement on the 15th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the National Day of Service:
“Today, we mark the 15th anniversary of the terrorist attacks in the United States that killed nearly 3,000 innocent victims – including 24 Canadians.
“On this solemn day, we join with the families and friends of the victims to remember and honour those who fell. We also offer our heartfelt support to those still struggling with the physical and emotional injuries they sustained on 9/11.
“We recognize the extraordinary courage and bravery of the first responders on that day and the days that followed. We honour the EMTs, the firefighters, the police officers,
and all those who ran toward the sounds of danger and the plumes of smoke, risking their lives so others might live.
“While 9/11 will long be remembered as a day of destruction and terror, let us also remember it for the remarkable humanity that was shown in such a tragic time. May we never forget the countless Canadians, from coast to coast to coast, who opened their hearts and their homes to those affected by the attacks.
“On behalf of the Government of Canada, Sophie and I encourage Canadians to remember the tremendous outpouring of goodwill shown on 9/11 by participating in charitable and community activities, and other worthy causes across the country, as part of the National Day of Service.”
On September 11 itself:
Justin Trudeau took a personal day. No official business in the usual sense.
And what about September 12?
From Daniel’s article about Obama:
Love, of a person or of a country, is not judged by what we say. It is judged by what we do.
Every politician with ambition claims to love America. Most only love themselves. Some love other things. No one can know what is it in Obama’s heart, which is why the media’s shrill demands that Scott Walker affirm Obama’s love for America are silly and cynical, but we can certainly follow his passions.
We show our passions in the things that we really care about. We all have our duties and obligations. Obama’s obligations include delivering speeches praising America, occasionally placing his hand on his heart during the pledge of allegiance (when he can find it) and badly saluting soldiers with a latte cup.
But are these the things he loves and cares about?
We can follow Obama’s passions the way that an adulterer’s trail to his mistress can be followed no matter how many cards or stuffed bears he gives to his wife.
What are the things that Obama is passionate about?
In his first days in office, he signed a number of executive orders. Of his first five orders, three involved Muslim terrorists captured and held in Gitmo. His third executive order was about the “humane” treatment of terrorists. His fourth executive order sought to close Gitmo. Like the man who can’t wait to get away from his wife so he can call his mistress, Obama made his priorities clear from the start.
Trudeau’s path after about a year in office is getting easier and easier to chart by the same method.
UPDATE: On September 12, Trudeau…:
Trudeau visits mosque with terror connections
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau visited a gender-segregated mosque Monday morning whose imam is a member of a group considered a terrorist organization abroad.
Samy Metwally, the lead imam at the Ottawa Muslim Association, is a “a member of the International Union for Muslim Scholars (IUMS)”, according to the mosque’s website. In 2014 the United Arab Emirates placed the group on its list of designated terrorist organizations.
“IUMS was founded by Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s leading ideologue and a notorious figure who, among other accomplishments, was for many years banned from entering France and endorsed the murder of Israelis,” Daniel Pipes, an author and Islamic studies scholar who has taught at Harvard and University of Chicago, explained via e-mail.
H/T Ilona Szilágyi, Pete P.
France: A Aubervilliers, Asians are organizing to ensure their safety
Published on 15-08-2016 Changed at 15-08-2016 at 21:07
Relatives and family members pay tribute to Zhang Shaolin killed in an attack in Aubervilliers, north of Paris, August 14, 2016.
A week after the murder of a Chinese in Aubervilliers, north of Paris, the community suffering daily attacks, decided to react.
A dozen men gathered on August 15 in a restaurant in Aubervilliers, north of Paris, eyes glued to their mobile phones. They stand ready to intervene in case a member of the Chinese community is attacked in the vicinity.
One of them, Yvon Sun, was himself attacked four times last month. “In all areas of La Courneuve and Aubervilliers, the Chinese are daily victims of aggression and violence,” he testifies.
The Chinese community in North Paris then proceded to organize themselves. Now, they never go out alone, explains Charly Shen. “In this group, we will try to return home together, we’re going to pick up each other at subway station to avoid being attacked,” he explains.
Increasing incidents of aggression
For the Chinese community in France, there is anger still, a week after the deadly attack on a 49 years old Chinese in Aubervilliers. The man fell at the hands of three men in the street. It is far from being an isolated case. Racist attacks against the Chinese are multiplying for several months. They therefore got organized to better secure their movements.
Rui Wang, spokesman of the Association of Chinese youth of France (AJCF), says that Asians represent an easy target because they are the cliche victims. “They think that the Asian is a safe and easy target, and so they’re attacking him, he says. At first we joked on ‘the other’, we attacked in words. Gradually it comes to actions. Today, first drops of blood were shed. We would not want that tomorrow others suffer the same fate.“
A petition on the Internet to denounce the anti-Asian attacks had collected 9000 signatures on the evening of August 15.
[Translators note: the article carefully fails to mention who the aggressors are. But one may guess its not the indigenous French]
How does Clinton stack up against Trump’s “basket of deplorables” (sic)
Australian police link jihad attack directly with Islam and the Islamic State
1, Man in Australia being charged with Islamic State inspired attack
A 22-year-old man charged with a terrorist attack in south-west Sydney was inspired by the so-called Islamic State group, NSW Police allege.
He is accused of stabbing a 59-year-old man a number of times at a reserve on Olhlfsen Road at Minto on Saturday afternoon.
The victim suffered injuries to his body and hands, and remains in hospital in a serious condition.
(Oz-Rita explains that in Australia, a reserve means something like a federal or territorial park, and not a lawless place with cheap cigarettes that taste like cat poo. Also that this is the first attack clearly being identified as an Islamic State attack with no attempts at deflection. Rita also explains that this breaking attack is also connected to this Islamic State shout-out for more Individual Jihad, as called for in Islamic scriptures.
This graphic is from the Islamic State magazine to encourage Muslims to murder people in individual Jihad
Please see this Stephen Coughlin video for an explanation of individual jihad, which is the real Islamic doctrine which Western leaders attempt to dismiss as “lone Wolf attacks”.
Here is the press conference from the NSW police:
Thank you Oz-Rita for the detailed explanation. More will be added as I sift through the information provided.
UPDATE:
The Australian, which has a subscriber paywall, explains that this attack was directly linked to an Islamic State publication which encourages individual jihad.
The Australian explains that the following quoted text is from the IS online magazine but does not link to it. I suspect a link will show up in the comments shortly. If it does, one may wish to view it as a necessary function of self defense to know what the enemy is advocating and planning rather than pretend it is being posted to support the enemy’s mission. Not showing the public is more dangerous than showing it and always has been. Only a post modern and culturally Marxist vision would suggest the public should not be made aware of a direct threat to them.
“Light the ground beneath (Australians) aflame and scorch them with terror,”
‘’Kill them on the streets of Brunswick, Broadmeadows, Bankstown, and Bondi,’’ Kill them at the MCG, the SCG, the Opera House, and even in their backyards. Stab them, shoot them, poison them, and run them down with your vehicles. Kill them wherever you find them until the hollowness of their arrogance is filled with terror and they find themselves on their knees with their backs broken under the weight of regret for having waged a war against the believers, and by Allah’s will, and then through your sacrifices, this Ummah will be victorious.’’
There is a second article quoted with more graphics and incitements to wage jihad. Best if this is updated with the original links.
UPDATE 2:
This Australian link is not behind a paywall and names the attacker.
Link to Islamic State magazine
Obama and Merkel are clearly working on a post civilization agenda
People of France begin to speak their minds to authorities
Just sayin is all
Have a good look at Hillary’s broach in today’s segment with Trey Gowdy.
Council on American Islamic Relations has a cool logo
Check out the flags behind Hillary Clinton and notice the same broach.
Thanks for the insight Ava Lon
This much is perfectly correct.
Islam cannot stand up to genuine scrutiny. The problem in our society is not enough freedom. Freedom is death to Islam. Making more totalitarian laws is clearly not the answer, even if I share the emotional component of this woman’s thesis.
There are several more comments on this post as well. But it bears mentioning that the solution is less laws and more freedom and not the reverse.
Thank you for the observation PC.