Poland: Miriam Shaded for Fronda.pl: Zero tolerance for extremism and Islam must be outlawed

An original Translation by Ava Lon with much thanks!

From this Polish language News site:

Are rapes carried out by immigrants in Germany and the bombings in Western Europe going to continue indefinitely? What to do to halt this vicious cycle of violence fueled by Islamist fanatics? We talk about it with Miriam Shaded, social activist and president of the Foundation Esther.

Only in the last few days in Germany, there has been more of rapes carried out by Islamic immigrants. Is this phenomenon going to further escalate with time?

If Germany will keep the same immigration policy that they did so far, this issue will obviously increasingly escalate. Today, Muslims in Europe are unpunished. Rapes are unpunished. The perpetrators get caught, judged, but then are released into the wild. Women who have been raped do not receive justice. I haven’t noticed however the governments in Western Europe, reacting to their grievance.

Q.Where is this immigrant aggression against European women coming from?

A. As I mentioned many times before, Islam condones rape of women, that have been “taken into possession,” he condones rape of infidels and those women who do not dress like a Muslim. The more Muslims arrive to Europe and the bigger consent to their behavior and to their promotion of hatred against women, the more rapes will occur.

Q. What to do to somehow stop or stem the wave of those rapes?

A. I think first of all you have to change the policy,the law simply has to be applied, and punishment for the perpetrators of this type of crime should be increased. Unfortunately, the situation is bad. In Sweden for example, every three minutes a Swedish woman is raped, and everything goes in that direction, and those statistics will continue to be this high, also in Germany and other European countries. At the moment, when it comes to risk of rape, Sweden is in the third place in the world. We can see clearly, where the policy of multi-culti and Islamization is leading.

Q.So there’s a simple correlation – the greater the passivity of the authorities and tolerance towards crime, the greater the escalation …

A. Yes. It’s exactly like that.

Q. One thing are the immigrant attacks against the local population, but there is also a terrorist threat. French Prime Minister recently predicted that future attacks in this country are inevitable. What can Europe do, while it’s being consumed by fire more and more?

A. First of all, you need to identify who the enemy is and why it comes to this type of event. I keep saying that the enemy is the teaching of Islam. There are parts in the Koran saying that any Muslim who kills an infidel, or commits a terrorist attack will receive the greatest reward in heaven and that he is more important than any other Muslim. This is the root cause of the problem and as long as Europe doesn’t realize it, until they don’t realize that every pious Muslim, who strongly believes in the teachings of Muhammad, is a threat, until Europe won’t be able to handle this problem.

Q. What concrete action can be taken against this threat?

A. We should take appropriate steps to outlaw Islam. We need to defend ourselves against attacks that are happening and the war that is already underway. It is a war against the infidels. We have to clarify who is the enemy we are fighting against. Finally, we must open our eyes and start acting adequately to the situation.

Q. Is there any hope for countries such as Germany or France, where the Islamic problem is very far gone? We can still say “No” to Islam, but can Germans and French still do the same?

A.They need to gradually start the process. First they should begin with the most radical imams operating in these countries. They need to deport everyone who have committed any crime. Gradually, they should deal with this using existing law, and after a while they switch to more radical methods.

Q. Methods that would pull out this root from which all those events are sprouting, namely the Islamic religion?

A. Yes, but first they have to deal with the most radical groups. Germany and France should also introduce rules that would cause deportation of entire families in connection with the crimes committed.

Q. Bottom line: all hope for Western Europe is contained in the words “Zero Tolerance”?

A. Yes exactly. There is hope. There is still a lot more of us than Muslims in Europe, and it seems to me that at this moment we still have a very good chance, if in fact we apply the principle of zero tolerance and if we really implement it. If the policy of multi-culti and political correctness continues, Europe will fall, and we will lose another countries, like we have already lost Sweden.

Thank you very much for the interview

[Translator’s note below]

Here’s wiki about that girl:

Miriam Shaded (born June 29, 1986, Warsaw) – is a Polish entrepreneur, human rights activist and critic of Islam. She is the founder and president of the Estera Foundation tasked with bringing the Christian refugees from Syria to Poland.

Miriam Shaded was born into a Polish-Syrian family in Warsaw as the youngest of seven siblings. Her mother is Polish. Her father, Moner Shaded, was born in Syria.[1] He is a pastor of a Presbyterian church in Warsaw.[2]

Ms. Shaded studied evangelical theology and works in IT projects.

{UPDATE]

Perfect Child made a comment under this post reproduced in part below:

“We should take appropriate steps to outlaw Islam.”

These morons are all of the same mindset, and fall into the hands of Communism.

We don’t outlaw Islam. We allow the average person to riddicule it.

So why does she think like a totalitarian Socialist?

This much is perfectly correct.

Islam cannot stand up to genuine scrutiny. The problem in our society is not enough freedom. Freedom is death to Islam. Making more totalitarian laws is clearly not the answer, even if I share the emotional component of this woman’s thesis.

There are several more comments on this post as well. But it bears mentioning that the solution is less laws and more freedom and not the reverse.

Thank you for the observation PC.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

16 Replies to “Poland: Miriam Shaded for Fronda.pl: Zero tolerance for extremism and Islam must be outlawed”

  1. “We should take appropriate steps to outlaw Islam.”

    These morons are all of the same mindset, and fall into the hands of Communism.

    We don’t outlaw Islam. We allow the average person to riddicule it.

    So why does she think like a totalitarian Socialist?

    “Ms. Shaded studied evangelical theology and works in IT projects”

    ’nuff said.

    • Because between Islam and Communism, Islam is the better of the two evils; the most moral wins; making Muhammad the pedophile, warlord and BS Prophet of the Jewish People, a saint by comparison with the sodomites in office who will destroy every family of men for the bountiful harvest of earthy slaves of North Korea.

      • “The family is regarded by North Korean authorities as a “cell,” or basic unit of society, but not an economic entity. A person participates in production in a cooperative, factory, or office and individually earns “work points.” Although on a socialist cooperative payment for work points earned by family members goes to the family unit as a whole, the family head–the father or the grandfather–no longer manages and organizes the family’s economic life.”
        http://countrystudies.us/north-korea/34.htm

  2. Everything she says is 100% correct. And for the true moderate Muslims who hate Jihad and want to join our societies – no hijabs, no headscarves, no little beanies. They’re going to have to grin and bear it and have a sense of humor about the whole thing, as their mosques are surveilled and their internet is listened in on.

    If we just continue to be too “polite” to say anything about Muslim rape and Muslim violence, they will only grow bolder and bolder, which is exactly what the more radical members of our beloved left wing would love to see. They are planning to time their own Marxist revolution to happen the day before the Islamic revolution, leaving them a whole day to deal with the Islamists, just like the leftists planned so successfully in Iran.

    Perhaps our leftists would like to watch some videos of the Iranian holy men hanging their young socialist useful idiot accomplices. Interestingly, when a 21-year-old leftist do-gooder girl is hanged by the Islamic no-trap-door-no-mercy method, her whole body is instantly rendered immobile, like a kitten being picked up by the scruff of the neck, except for the feet which pedal back and forth as she chokes to death, in a pitiful little walking dance…

    Muslims have no concept of mercy or fairness. This does not endear them to me. I personally do not believe in gross and senseless cruelty or blatant prejudice, no matter how many times the Holy Quran says it’s OK. I do not like the religion of Islam and would like to see it vanished entirely from our beautiful and civilized lands. That is what I think. That is my opinion. No mosques, no hijabs, no minarets, no “Allahu Akbar”. I want Islam gone! Now!

    • No matter what happens Islam is going to force us to change our laws. The left in all Western Nations have been working to destroy our traditional religions (Christianity and Judaism) while encouraging Islam. They have done this deliberately seeking to foment a series of civil wars in all Western Nations. These wars al almost upon us and they will be to a large extend wars of shadows, small party raids v small party raids and tit for tat atrocities before the wars are over. If the classical liberals win they will be forced to write laws that forbid religions that refuse to tolerate other religions. If the leftist or Islamists win they will write laws outlawing in hte case of socialists all religions or in the case of the Islamists outlawing all religions except Islam.

      This war of survival is a combination of a war of ideology combined with a religious war and a race war. Before it is over there will be many more then 3 sides and alliances wills shift at the most inconvenient times. As I said no matter who wins we will be forced to change our laws and our society.

  3. At the U.N., Only Israel Is an ‘Occupying Power’

    The United Nations began its annual session this week, and Israel will be prominent on the agenda. Many fear the Security Council may consider a resolution setting definite territorial parameters, and a deadline, for the creation of a Palestinian state.

    President Obama has hinted that in the final months of his term, he may reverse the traditional U.S. policy of vetoing such resolutions. The General Assembly, meanwhile, is likely to act as the chorus in this drama, reciting its yearly litany of resolutions criticizing Israel.

    If Mr. Obama is seeking to leave his mark on the Israeli-Arab conflict—and outside the negotiated peace process that began in Oslo—there is no worse place to do it than the U.N. New research we have conducted shows that the U.N.’s focus on Israel not only undermines the organization’s legitimacy regarding the Jewish state. It also has apparently made the U.N. blind to the world’s many situations of occupation and settlements.

    Our research shows that the U.N. uses an entirely different rhetoric and set of legal concepts when dealing with Israel compared with situations of occupation or settlements world-wide. For example, Israel is referred to as the “Occupying Power” 530 times in General Assembly resolutions. Yet in seven major instances of past or present prolonged military occupation—Indonesia in East Timor, Turkey in northern Cyprus, Russia in areas of Georgia, Morocco in Western Sahara, Vietnam in Cambodia, Armenia in areas of Azerbaijan, and Russia in Ukraine’s Crimea—the number is zero. The U.N. has not called any of these countries an “Occupying Power.” Not even once.

    It gets worse. Since 1967, General Assembly resolutions have referred to Israeli-held territories as “occupied” 2,342 times, while the territories mentioned above are referred to as “occupied” a mere 16 times combined. The term appears in 90% of resolutions dealing with Israel, and only in 14% of the much smaller number of resolutions dealing with the all the other situations, a difference that vastly surpasses the threshold of statistical significance. Similarly, Security Council resolutions refer to the disputed territories in the Israeli-Arab conflict as “occupied” 31 times, but only a total of five times in reference to all seven other conflicts combined.

    General Assembly resolutions employ the term “grave” to describe Israel’s actions 513 times, as opposed to 14 total for all the other conflicts, which involve the full gamut of human-rights abuses, including allegations of ethnic cleansing and torture. Verbs such as “condemn” and “deplore” are sprinkled into Israel-related resolutions tens more times than they are in resolutions about other conflicts, setting a unique tone of disdain.

    Israel has been reminded by resolutions against it of the country’s obligations under the Geneva Conventions about 500 times since 1967—as opposed to two times for the other situations.
    In particular, the resolutions refer to Article 49(6), which states that the “Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” This is the provision that the entire legal case against Israel settlements is based upon. Yet no U.N. body has ever invoked Article 49(6) in relation to any of the occupations mentioned above.

    This even though, as Mr. Kontorovich shows in a new research article, “Unsettled: A Global Study of Settlements in Occupied Territories,” all these situations have seen settlement activity, typically on a scale that eclipses Israel’s. However, the U.N. has only used the legally loaded word “settlements” to describe Israeli civilian communities (256 times by the GA and 17 by the Security Council). Neither body has ever used that word in relation to any other country with settlers in occupied territory.

    Our findings don’t merely quantify the U.N.’s double standard. The evidence shows that the organization’s claim to represent the interest of international justice is hollow, because the U.N. has no interest in battling injustice unless Israel is the country accused.

    At a time of serious global crises—from a disintegrating Middle East to a land war and belligerent occupation in Europe—the leaders of the free world cannot afford to tempt the U.N. into indulging its obsessions. Especially when the apparent consequence of such scapegoating is that the organization ignores other situations and people in desperate need of attention.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/at-the-u-n-only-israel-is-an-occupying-power-1473808544

  4. So here is the relation that links Europe’s future to that of the Jews in the Middle East. The nations that work the hardest to re-institute Jews’ dhimmi status are the nations that welcome their own submission. That is, if an Italian feels that Jews can’t live freely in their holy cities of Hebron or Jerusalem, how can he begin to argue that the sons of Italy should have a Catholic-supportng Pope in the Vatican?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.