Category Archives: U.S.A.

Canada, federally and provincially, is in the process of passing multiple draconian, Marxist and totalitarian bits of legislation, each of which will end democracy and rule of law. In fact, will end Greek thought as a legal means of making personal determinations.

Below, a small excerpt from Ontario bill 89, which is being interpreted, in our view correctly, to mean that if your child wants to wear a dress and you say no, the child can and may be taken by the state and raised by the state till its somewhere between 16 and 18 years old.

“Significant changes are made to terminology.  The terms society ward and Crown ward are no longer used.  Instead, the new Act refers to children who are in interim society care or extended society care.  The new Act also does not refer to children being abandoned or to runaways.

The age of protection is increased to include 16 and 17 year olds:  societies may now apprehend and bring into care children aged 16 and 17.  Under the current Act, children may only be apprehended and brought into care until they turn 16 (although children subject to a protection order before they turn 16 may continue to receive protection services until they are 18).  As part of this change, the definition of a child being in need of protection in the new Act now specifies that a 16 or 17 year old is in need of protection in circumstances or conditions that may be prescribed by regulation.  A new authority to enter into agreements with 16 and 17 year olds in need of protection is included in this Part.

The matters to be considered in determining the best interests of a child are changed.  The current Act incudes the child’s views and wishes, if they can be reasonably ascertained; the new Act also includes the child’s views and wishes, and specifies that they are to be given due weight in accordance with the child’s age and maturity.  The current Act includes the child’s cultural background; the new Act includes the child’s cultural and linguistic heritage.  The religious faith in which the child is being raised is deleted as a matter to be considered.  Added is the child’s race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.  The provision in the current Act that the best interests of an Indian or native child (referred to in the new Act as a First Nations, Inuk or Métis child) be determined by taking into consideration the importance of preserving the child’s cultural identity is expanded to also require taking into consideration the importance of the child’s connection to community.

The authority for societies to enter into voluntary agreements with persons unable to temporarily care for their children and with young persons is moved from Part II (Voluntary Access to Services) of the current Act to Part V of the new Act.  Temporary care agreements may be entered into with respect to children of any age and are no longer restricted to children younger than 16.  The authority to enter into special needs agreements is not included in the new Act.”

It is likely that if Canada has become Marxist enough to pass this bill (notice all the exemptions for non-White non Western peoples) then its Marxist enough to criminalize opposition to it in any meaningful way. Certainly if not criminalize, to marginalize, publicly humiliate and disenfranchise. As Hillary Clinton said she would do as a way of sneaking UN resolution 16/18 in light of the US 1st amendment.

Canada’s federal M103 certainly destined to become an actual law criminalizing criticism of Islam, and what else could it possibly ever be by the admission of the people who want it, and other tactics in the cauldron like E-411 are powerful indicators that the days of democracy and Greek thought, The Enlightenment, are certainly over. At least in Canada and probably in much of Western Europe. Only in the US is there any pushback in favour of people’s actual rule of themselves via constitutional law. Something Canada has only in name.

To the point:

Some years ago I had a conversation with two security experts. One was American, a lawyer and had considerable experience with the various security apparatus of the USA. The other, a top level computer security person with powerful credentials and more importantly, a practical record of accomplishment in the security field which adds more weight in some ways than many academics in the field for this article.

The discussion was. on the pros and cons of using an encrypted messaging/calling application like Signal on your phone. Signal has been in the news recently because Obama appointees and hires in the usual departments of the deconstruction of America brick by brick like ‘climate change’ and so on, have been installing it to hide their activities  from President Trump, who is less enthusiastic about their mission to destroy industrial society in the USA.

The opinions on using encrypted or hidden comms went like this:

US Security expert:

can likely monitor any communications you have no matter how. One shouldn’t bother to use Signal or other programs like that if you genuinely want your communications to be private.

However you SHOULD use encryption, Signal or otherwise. The reason being that the NSA and similar agencies use the flimsy and thin excuse that they merely gather all signals out there in the aether because they are out there to grab and look at them cause they are just floating by. If you encrypt your communications you are at least demanding your legal 4th amendment rights*  to privacy.

So while the NSA is still reading your private communications and violating your right to privacy wholesale and often for trivial purposes (*2) using encryption means they have to actually go to a judge to get a warrant to violate your rights before they can actually use that information to act against you, as you asserted your rights by attempting to make your communications private.

Canadian security expert:

Signal is an open source PGP based encryption program which would take the entire computing power of ALL NSA COMPUTERS to crack even one text message several years to do. So use it. Your comms will be safe.

ME:

Any google device is spying on you. Google has become Orwell Meets Kafka meets Hillary Clinton.  If you use a google device, you have no privacy in almost any way. Google submits to data requests from the NSA without warrants. So you have no protection under US constitutional laws. And the chances are that google devices can read your texts before they are encrypted, and the other side’s messages after they are decrypted.

Social media? Forget about it. You may as well call the police and read your posts yourself. Which will at least annoy them as they prefer to get it illegally cause its easier to sort that way.

We have already seen in 2016 how authorities, police in fact, went to people’s homes and warned or arrested people in Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany just for posting on their own social media accounts things which opposed government policy on mass immigration and the destruction of their civilizations and cultures.

This is days away in Canada.

Just having an opinion contrary to government policy is now known by authorities that have no business knowing it, and acted upon in ways ranging from actual arrest to firing to public humiliation.

Apple make a big splash last year about protecting the data on their devices from US authorities. The story was amazingly fishy. I do not believe a word of it.

By the way Canadians, Canada has a nearly identical well funded agency to the NSA, and we don’t even have a 4th amendment or anything nearly as useful as that. Just in case you thought you could sigh with relief.

If you want privacy, write a letter, hand deliver it, and then burn it after you show it to them.

But definitely use Signal or a similar app. At least then you force them to at least pretend to obey the law. The American expert makes the point. At least take your right to privacy. Make them prove that they had a probable cause to Big Brother you.

For technically minded people, you may find this a worthy Sunday afternoon project:

Thank you for everything ML.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog

*(in the USA Canadians may or may not have anything like that as our constitution is nearly incomprehensible)

*2 NSA employees were caught spying on lovers to check for sexual fidelity