Category Archives: U.S.A.

Another young man assaulted for wearing a MAGA hat

Posted on by

This is an important story. This is about the new leftist violent tribalism that has infected nearly every walk of life. It has even hit James Woods now that his agent has decided not to represent him anymore, seemingly purely for ideological reasons. James Woods supports the president. And that is the only reason.

I hope its grounds for a suit.

To understand the present, you have to know the past: Why one man left the left, to fight the left

Posted on by

This is really good. Thank you Richard.

Part 1. The man, his motives, his history:

Part 2: Breitbart, the media’s deceptions against non-leftists, the good guys in the FBI:

Part 3: Israeli far left, (Haaretz) media attacks on law enforcement, Walter Durante and the NYT leftist agenda

Dear American people…

Posted on by

Please watch these four videos. If you still do not get it after seeing this series, then, well it saddens me to say that you will deserve what you get.

And Canadians, its worse here. Our PM is actively working with these exact forces to achieve these exact goals. Our last chance is whenever Justin Trudeau decides to call the next election. And its going to be heavily rigged with fake citizens armed with drivers licences with which they can vote.

Muslim Brotherhood in the USA Part II

Posted on by

This is the second part of the 2 part series on islamic dominance in the USA.

It is part of the overall series by Israeli TV 10 on the Muslim Brotherhood in the West and so far we have translated part 1 of the USA and part 1 of Islamic control in France.

This one is especially disturbing however.

Very many thanks to our hard working and meticulous translator from Hebrew to English for the hard and time consuming work on these.

[Additional comment by Eeyore]

There are two parts of this video that I feel deserve pointing out in terms of critical omissions. The first is the black cleric who falsely claims that the Bible is racist while the Koran is not. In fact, the koran is much clearer and more direct about Black Africans utility as slaves. Mohammad was a slave trader and also felt that the devil was a black man and there is much more in the Koran about the inherent badness of being a black person, and also the koran and some hadiths, make out that Mohammad was unusually white, which added to his divinity.

So all in all, the Koran is far more racist than the Bible and Im pretty confident that cleric knew it.

Secondly, and more importantly. near the end the Israeli is discussing the Hudud, or sharia corporal punishments and the muslim gets away with a long anticipated logical fallacy. He makes the claim that electrocution and lethal injection and so on are more cruel than beheading.

This may or may not be true, but it commits three critical lies by omission.

The first is that beheading is only one form of hudud. Stoning to death, amputations, crucifixions etc. are certainly more cruel than Western corporal punishments.

Second is that the nature of the crime for which you receive these punishments are wildly different. Essentially, in Islam, anything you are accused of doing that inhibits the growth of the authority of Islam will get you the hudud. In the West, what we consider a crime is based on reason and the sanctity of the individual and his property rights. There has to be a victim generally speaking. And you have to have done that person wrong. With Islam, the victim is Islam itself or the perception of Islam. So blasphemy is a capital offence. In reasoned Western law, the very idea is ludicrous.

And thirdly, the method of determining guilt is vastly different. In Islam a person is guilty in essence for not being a muslim. So if you are accused of say, drinking from a well to be used only by muslims and thereby spreading your “najis”, as in the case of that young Christian girl in jail in Pakistan, you could be executed without any proof other than the say so of a muslim, who may, and even likely, has an ulterior and selfish motive. Such as they want something from you and you wont give it.

In the case of Asia Bibi, my guess would be sex.

In the West, we have to prove, using science and reason, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused actually did whatever it is they are accused of. And the cornerstone of our system is, “let 10 guilty men go free before punishing one innocent”. (This is an excellent method, except when confusing a military act with a criminal one. Then its a recipe for failure)

While this is a documentary exposing the Muslim Brotherhood and the Soft Jihad in the USA and it is not a platform for arguing with its thinking, I did feel that the narrator could have addressed these two items at the end in a voice over. In any case, this is a profoundly important documentary and I hope you will all watch it and send it out to all you know.

Thank you for reading.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.

Short excerpt of Israeli doc on Muslim Brotherhood in USA part II

Posted on by

About 13,000 of you have seen the full segment on the Israeli documentary on the Muslim Brotherhood in France by now. Thanks to Bill Warner and others, it came to a lot of people’s attention. But so far not that many have seen the segment on the same organization’s control of the USA in some parts. You can see the first episode here, and below, a sneak preview of the sequel, Muslim Brotherhood in America part II.

Interesting ‘explanation’ of the Hungarian border strategy

Posted on by

I have no idea if this is for real or not but it makes for great reading either way. Its from Reddit so… could be anything from anyone right? Still, here it is:

[–]GevlonHUN[S] 740 points 

Hungary building a multiple-layer border fence stopped illegal migration to the country, practically overnight. But one has to understand how it works legally.

The main trick of the Soros-NGOs is constant litigation. No wall is unclimbable and most illegal immigrants don’t cross the wild border but enter legally and overstay or violate whatever visa they got. Then they get detained waiting for a deportation trial. During this trial the NGO lawyers try everything to win time. Why? Because this overcorwds the detention center. The longer the deportation legal process takes, the fewer deportations can happen. If the detention center overflows, the authorities have no other option than letting low-risk migrants back to the population where they disappear. This is called catch-and-release. This happens even under the Trump administration, not out of malice, but because the whole system is overloaded.

Now let me introduce how the geniuses in the Orbán government solved this problem:

  • the border fence is not on the border. It’s a couple meters behind it. So there is a strip of land outside which is legally Hungary.
  • In some zones, the border fence cuts deep into Hungarian territory, creating large areas of Hungary outside of the fence. These are called “transit zones”.
  • When a migrant is caught inside Hungary, he is instantly transferred to the transit zone, trough one of the gates pictured.
  • The above act is not deportation, but detention as the migrant is still in Hungary, just outside of the fence. No lawyer can do anything about this move as it needs no court step.
  • He can wait there until his trial is complete and he can approach one of the barracks there where he can present an asylum request and wait for its processing and the subsequent court appeal if he is rejected.
  • The point is that while he’s waiting, he is outside of the fence, so practically he is not in Hungary, but legally he is.
  • The zone has no fence on the border side, so migrants are free to leave that way – back to where they came from. This prevent overcrowding. Most migrants don’t linger around for their trials, but go back to try to cross the border somewhere else. By not being around for trial, they get their case dismissed.

So no matter how long it takes before a migrant is legally deported, he is not spending a single minute in our streets and he don’t cost much, since most of them leave the zone for a foreign country where he is no longer our problem. “Catch and release – into Mexico” you could call the same system in the USA.

Yes but was it halal?

Posted on by

Another great example to archive in case you ever discuss multiculturalism with someone who might actually think it exists. This was a straight out attempted honour killing and perfectly permissible by the rules of Reliance of the Traveler. Assuming of course that they defamed Islam in some way, minor or major. Which would include disobeying the husband or father.

Robert Spencer writes it up here.

 

Israeli investigative journalist gives interview on the Muslim Brotherhood in the West

Posted on by

In the written article associated with this video, the same journalist says that civil war in Europe is inevitable, and will be worse than all the Islamic atrocities combined so far. Perhaps we can get that translated as well. But here is the broadcast part of the interview as it is, for the time being.

For those of you who did not see his documentary on jihad groups in the west, here is the segment on the USA. The segment on France, which is much more frightening apparently, is in the works I am told. But to get an idea of why this person’s opinion matters, you can see the segment that is available here:

Chemical weapons attack, maybe, by someone possibly

Posted on by

The first casualty of war is truth. And we are pretty much always at war. So… yeah.

Here is a clip from the Syrian Army showing a chemical weapons factory they found belonging to the terrorists in Ghouta.

The Russians claim not to have found any trace of a chemical weapons attack at all, and are making rather clear threats to retaliate against a US strike on Syria to any platform that launches the strike. This would mean US naval assets. The US takes that sort of attack rather seriously with the notable exception of Barack Obama who seemed to encourage them.

From Iranian propaganda outlet, Farsnews:

The Arabic service of RT news channel quoted a Russian military diplomatic source as warning that any increased military build-up in the Mediterranean will intensify tensions, adding that Moscow is pursuing and assessing the developments.

 

He stressed that the Russian A-50 reconnaissance planes have been monitoring the guided-missile destroyer the USS Donald Cook’s voyage in the past few days, saying, “The Russian warships are able to give a rapid response if necessary.”

 

The source noted that the Russian navy also has deployed submarines in the Mediterranean equipped with torpedoes and missiles to destroy marine and ground targets.

Meantime, Russia’s Humeimim airbase in Syria’s Lattakia province is equipped with anti-ship cruise missiles of Kh-35 type.

 

The US newspaper, Wall Street Journal, reported earlier that the US already has one guided-missile destroyer, the USS Donald Cook, in the eastern Mediterranean, where it could take part in any strike on Syria, according to US defense officials. A second, the USS Porter could get there in a few days.

 

Russia has maintained that there has been no evidence of any chemical attack in Douma and sees Washington’s threats to “punish” Syria with military force as a pretext for intervention.

 

On March 13, Russia’s military chief of staff, General Valery Gerasimov, said that Moscow had intelligence about militants in Eastern Ghouta preparing a false-flag chemical attack in the area.

The senior official added that the US could use the fake attack as a pretext for striking out at government quarters in Damascus.

Mirror.UK: Russia will shoot down US missiles fired at Syria and target launch sites, warns ambassador

US missiles fired at Syria will be shot down, and launch sites targeted, a Russian ambassador warned today.

The measures threatened by Alexander Zasypkin, Russia’s ambassador to Lebanon, could trigger a major escalation in the Syrian conflict.

 

In comments broadcast on Tuesday evening, said he was referring to a statement by Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Russian armed forces chief of staff.

The Russian military said on March 13 that it would respond to any U.S. strike on Syria, targeting any missiles and launchers involved in such an attack. Russia is Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s most powerful ally.

 

The United States and its allies are considering whether to hit Syria over a suspected poison gas attack that medical relief organisations say killed dozens of people in the rebel-held town of Douma near Damascus on Saturday.

Many years ago, this site posted videos taken by the pre-Islamic state groups, Al-Qaeda or Nusra front or whatever Muslim Brotherhood front group of jihadis you want to name in the region, where they were developing chemical weapons and testing them on rabbits with grotesque success. Those videos are likely scrubbed off the internet but in an emergency can likely be found and reposted.

Shortly after the Islamic State was declared, there were other videos of Islamic terrorist groups using fairly crude home made or adapted weapons systems to launch chemical weapon containers into neighbourhoods. So the evidence of these groups using these weapons against civilians is very strong. While the likelihood of the optometrist, Assad, leader of Syria, launching a pointless WMD attack against his own population hours or days after the US president announces he is planning a troop withdrawal seems counter-intuitive.

Clearly it would result in an undesirable outcome for Syria.

Unless it doesn’t.

The only thing that fits the puzzle to me would be if the US hit Iranian assets in the area, freeing Al Assad from the yoke of that tyranny using the weapons attack as a false flag to do that.

Its possible that Assad could be a good partner in the region if he was free of the pressure from Iran which I am certain is large and undesired.

But then again, the first casualty of war, right? Just speculating really.

Looking forward to all your reasoned responses.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.

Interesting collage

Posted on by

I look forward to comments from Americans or those more familiar with TV to tell me who and what the people and organizations here are, and any deeper meanings of this.

Sadly, well joyfully in truth, I gave up “TV” many years ago except what streams on demand, so I don’t know who these people are or the meaning of this beyond that some stations clearly have a script its anchors follow.

So please do comment.

Thank you Xanthippa, EB.