Category Archives: Sharia Law

The BBC, moral relativism and dangerous, even treasonous deceptions.

Posted on by

Yesterday I posted a story as part of the links & News of the day, an item about universities in the UK and gender segregation at lectures.

I had another listen to it today and noticed what was said at just after the 50 second mark. (link should bring you right there.)

Did you hear that? The BBC reporter actually said:

“…the muslim right to segregate trumps women’s right to sit where they want”.

Get that?

The BBC reporter made the statement that there is such a thing as a ‘muslim right’, which of course there is not, and this fictitious right actually trumps the real right of women to choose where they want to sit.

For clarity’s sake there is no such thing as a collective right. If Jews for example want the right not to eat pork or work on Saturday, then they have the individual right to not order pork or cook it or eat it which may mean they have to change jobs etc. and they have the individual right not to work on Saturday, which again, may mean they may have to change jobs as some companies may be open Saturdays and it would be grossly unfair to non-Jewish employees to force them to work more saturdays to accommodate a Jew who chooses not to. However that Jewish person has the individual right to choose a job or career that doesn’t require working on the Jewish sabbath. He does not have the right to force others to not eat pork or work on Saturdays. These is because there is no collective ‘Jewish right’. Only how people make choices within the parameters of their own rights.

What this BBC reporter has said is tantamount to treason if such a thing was still a crime in the UK, as they are inventing laws which actually undermine the most fundamental in free societies. That of individual rights which cannot and must not be “trumped’ by imaginary collective rights to bully those who do not adhere to those religious principles.

Muslims have, and always have had in free societies, the right not to sit together. If some bearded clam and his burka clad slave want to attend a lecture together and sit apart they are already perfectly entitled to do so. But to force this on the rest of the population and claim it is a right? Well that would be like forcing non-Muslims to not have pork as a menu option in a publicly funded school because it offends muslims just to be near it. And that, we all know, could never happen. Right?

I wonder how Rosa Parks would do in today’s United Kingdom. I suspect I know.

Eeyore for Vlad Tepes

Pakistan mob kills one over Koran pages

Posted on by

 MSN.NZ

A mob killed a man and wounded three others over the alleged desecration of a Koran in the southwestern Pakistani city of Quetta.

The violence started when some vendors allegedly found torn-out pages of Koran in a pomegranate crate they received in a shipment from neighbouring Iran, witnesses and officials say.

H/T M

But who is the imam in the SUN story about stoning believers to death and how good it is for them?

Posted on by

Thank you Grace for doing this leg work:

Shaykh Faisal Abdur-Razak:

Served on the Government of Canada Interfaith Committee:

The Province of Ontario Multifaith Council:

The City of Brampton Multifaith Committee.

There is much more on Sacred Knowledge, a UK tard site,  website about this guy. And below, the SUN video again (Is also in the post below) of his belief that stoning muslim believers to death is a good thing for them.

The repentant Danish imam and the cartoons that annoyed the world.

Posted on by

Yes, the religious muslims now want to kill him. But not for the right reasons. They want to kill him for apparently turning away from jihad and islam’s more violent precepts and directives while what they should want him punished for, is the massive fraud and deception he pulled even on them to entice muslims to riot against Danish and Western targets. Things including but not limited to, using a photograph from a French magazine showing a person in a hog calling contest with his hands behind his ears which this imam claimed was mocking the Islamic call to prayer, and even drawing a few really awful toons of his own and claimed they were part of the Danish newspaper’s collection. But of course this kind of deception to encourage violence seems to be welcomed in Islam so it is failing to continue that which motivates the actions in the second video below.

Meanwhile, here is his very recent speech to the International Free Press Society delivered in Denmark just a few days ago. I look forward to people’s impressions of him in the comments.

Here is an excellent and thorough history of the cartoon issue. (Thanks C.B. Sashenka)

The video below has to have been ‘shot’ post Aug 22 2013 as that is when the photo was taken of the Danish imam holding the Mo-toon cup with Kurt Westergaard

Forum on Islam sparks heated debate at Orland Park Library

Posted on by

Americans appear to be getting hip to the BS Islam peddles as we see here in this group of typical Americans. H/T M

Chicago Trib:

What a southwest suburban library had promoted as an educational forum this week on Muslim life in America quickly turned into a contentious debate about Islam.

The tone for the Thursday evening event was set while the three panelists at the Orland Park Library were still introducing themselves. In the first of many interruptions, a half-dozen audience members stood up and demanded that everyone recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

Library Director Mary Weimar denied their request. She explained that it wasn’t standard practice to recite the pledge at library events and requested that the attendees show more respect for the panelists.

Click to continue:

They steal from the church rectory and pollute

Posted on by

An original translation by Gaia

From Mantova Gazette:

Libiola. The money in the Grest disappears. After the theft, in a gesture of contempt, they do their business next to the altar. Four boys are recognized. The priest says: “I don’t care so much about the money, but that gesture …”

SERRAVALLE. First they gained entry to the rectory of Libiola and stole the money collected by the children of Grest, and then, still not happy, they entered the nearby church which, since last year’s earthquake, is a simple tensile structure made of plastic and defecated and urinated next to the altar. This was a contemptuous act of vandalism and sacrilege. The culprits were identified, because a woman saw them coming out of the tent. They were four boys of Moroccan origin, one resident in Serravalle, the others from Ostiglia and surroundings.

The incident happened on Thursday afternoon, but the parish priest, Father Eugenio Ferrari, has only yesterday made an official complaint to the police. That day the parish house of Libiola, inhabited by two nuns, was empty and locked because the sisters, along with the parish priest, had gone on a trip with the children of the Grest on a day trip to a mountain resort. Undisturbed, then, the criminals broke the lock of a back door and entered. They climbed upstairs and also forced the lock on the bedroom of the Sister Superior. In a bag in a drawer there were about eighty euro, the takings of the third week of Grest, plus a portion of the proceeds of a summer risotto organized by the group of children and parents. Having carried out the theft, the group was still not satisfied to leave. They wanted to leave their mark. A mark of vandalism, that because the place where it was made, also takes on the meaning of a provocation, a disgraceful affront.

Without difficulty, the criminals cut the plastic edge of the tent used as a church and, once inside, they left droppings near the altar. In the tent there is absolutely nothing to steal, then having terminated their organic needs, the thieves-vandals are gone. Apparently, a local woman saw them run away and recognized one, the one who lives in Libiola. The police identified the other three accomplices after receiving the complaint of the pastor. Up to now, four people have been identified, four boys of Moroccan origin living in and around Libiola Ostiglia, but no action against them has yet been taken because the investigations are still not concluded. Meanwhile, vents, bitter, Don Eugenio: “If they had come to steal the money because they are hungry, I would not have made the complaint; would have forgiven them. But what they have done in the church is a gesture on which you cannot ignore, it is beyond description. “I’m sorry, because, as it seems, the fact has been made of four Moroccan boys – goes on Don Eugenio – They have shown contempt towards our religion. But if I had done the same thing in their mosque, would not my neck have been cut? “.

Islam, inche allah, and the view of cause and effect and resultant system of responsibility under sharia

Posted on by

Recently we have seen a case where a Norwegian woman is raped in a Muslim country, is sentenced to a lengthy jail term for being raped as is the custom in Muslim lands, and her Muslim employer, the husband of rich and famous American pop star, Janet Jackson, fired her for merely reporting the rape as it showed cultural insensitivity or some variant thereof.

It is important to understand that sharia law is a system of crimes and punishments derived from a simple premise.

‘What can allow Mohamed, the founding, ‘first pirate of Islam’, the most latitude possible with his desires, wants, lusts and whims with the least personal responsibility for the consequences of acting on all those desires? And ideally of course, placing the responsibility for his actions on those upon whom he acts.

and by extension of course, all his male followers. So it should be easy to extrapolate from this principle and derive new specific laws as well as determine the likely outcome of nearly any court case based on a sort of, ‘medieval Muslim flavoured identity politics’. Kind of like the George Zimmerman case where leftists want him guilty even though he was not and want O.J. Simpson innocent despite knowing he was guilty. Muslim identity politics works similarly where the status, gender and religion the accused and victim determine the verdict and sentence.

The Observer sent me an interesting little story this morning which illustrates this point well specifically because it isn’t about rape or killing of Christians for some minor slight against Islam or a muslim real or imagined, but where someone who appears to be a wealthy powerful person beats on a working man for some reason in the street, and the person who gathered the evidence of this act will be the one who gets jail time.

(Post Script: I also resisted calling this post, ‘Dubai or not Dubai’ as the answer is so obviously not Dubai.)