Category Archives: Islam

Austrian TV presenter calls Geert Wilders a “Nazi“

Posted on by

 

Was it just a slip of the tongue, or was it an intentional defamation of Geert Wilders?

On May 22nd, presenter of Austrian’s TV channel “Plus 4”, Norbert Oberhauser (picture), called Geert Wilders and other EU-sceptic politicians “National Socialists” or briefly “Nazis” on his show “Guten Abend Österreich” (Good evening Austria).

It is just unacceptable to defame the famous Dutch politician and leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV), Geert Wilders, as a National Socialist, since he is known as a great friend of Israel. If you disagree with Mr Norbert Oberhauser, you can contact Plus 4 TV:

PULS 4 TV GmbH & Co KG

Chief executive: Markus Breitenecker

(responsible for content)

Maria Jacobi Gasse 1

A-1030 Wien

phone: + 43/1/999 88 – 0

fax: + 43/1/999 88 – 8888

ma*****************@***s4.com

Source: PI-News

http://www.pi-news.net/2014/05/oesterreichischer-tv-moderator-bezeichnet-geert-wilders-als-nationalsozialisten/

[Article and translation by Carpe Diem. I would like to add, that Geert Wilders falls politically into the category of classical liberal and would have been called a pinko commie’ by much of the US mainstream of the 1950s for his defense of gay rights and Jewish people. To call him a Nazi is the height of deception. Eeyore]

Germany- “Southerner“* beats Women with Iron Bar

Posted on by

Original translation by Carpe Diem

From PI News:

German City of Sonneberg (State of Thuringia/Thueringen)

As they were laughing, a man walking the Koeppelsdorfer Street felt provoked by two young women to such an extend that – without hesitation – he started to batter them with an iron bar. Now, police are looking for witnesses who have seen the grievous bodily harm. The attack happened on Saturday at 10.15 in the evening. Both women, 23 and 24-year-old, were standing in front of their home and were approached by a stranger. The man felt provoked, since the two women were laughing. Without hesitation, he took an iron bar, which he carried with him, and started to beat the women. The 24-year-old woman was injured in her face. He was described as follows: The man was about 1.85 m tall (6 Feet 1 Inch), had a sturdy, muscular build and dark short-shaven hair. He had a foreign accent and was described by the women as a southerner.

*Southerner or Southern European (Südländer in German) has become politically correct chiper language for a Turkish or Arab Muslim in Germany – like “Asian” for a Muslim in Britain

Sources:

PI-News

http://www.pi-news.net/2014/05/suedlaender-schlaegt-mit-eisenstange-auf-frauen-ein/

 

In Südthüringen.de (In Southern Thuringia/ local German website)

http://www.insuedthueringen.de/lokal/sonneberg_neuhaus/sonneberg/Mann-schlaegt-in-Sonneberg-mit-Eisenstange-auf-zwei-Frauen-ein;art83453,3347603

Pregnant Pakistani woman stoned to death by her family members

Posted on by

To quote Dan F who sent me the link,

“Let’s not be judgmental. Who are we to judge? One man’s family get-together is another man’s atrocity.”

Pregnant Pakistani woman stoned to death by her family

A pregnant Pakistani woman is stoned to death by her family in front of a high court for marrying the man she loved. Warning, this video contains disturbing images

 

The postmortem of a Pakistani woman killed for marrying the man she loved has established that she was five months pregnant, her stepson told Reuters on Wednesday.

Farzana Iqbal, 25, was stoned to death by her family outside one of Pakistan’s top courts in the city of Lahore on Tuesday in a so-called “honour” killing.

“Her baby died in her womb,” said Muhammad Aurangzeb, a son of her previous husband.

Honour killings are common in Pakistan [a Muslim state df], where women are often denied their basic rights. But the brutality of this case caused outrage around the world.

Many Pakistani families think it dishonourable for a woman to fall in love and choose her own husband.

Police said her father, two brothers and a former fiance were among the attackers. She suffered severe head injuries when they surrounded her and threw bricks at her, and was pronounced dead in hospital.

 

Anonymous article on the European Union, and the meaning of the recent elections

Posted on by

Written by Anon, submitted by Nicolai Sennels

With the Euro-Parliament elections in sight, the Dutch state television launched it’s propaganda machine. This is of course something you would see on many European national television channels these days, with the elections currently going on. The general idea – no matter in which language spoken or written – is to bring forth the idea that we the citizens of Europe could no longer live without the European union. Everything in our life that we take for granted –  besides the daily sunrise and the air that we breath – is because the E.U. made it possible.
Just like regular national elections, each party presented their idea’s on the matter.
Some parties seemed to want to abolish their own national government all together and ship all the power to Brussels, whilst others planned a course towards a possible exit from the E.U.
One of the traditional adage’s seemed to be that the E.U. provided to my country more jobs, more security and enhanced our economy altogether due to the usage of the Euro coin. Being in the European Union was the reason we paid less for our products at the moment.
Not all the reports on the European Union nowadays are that positive though.
Most of the anti-eu supporters have seen, or really should see, the report the german television channel RTL (1)  did some time ago on E.U. parliament members checking in on the attendance register (to get more money) and then leaving again.
The Dutch television – although generally pro-E.U. is on that matter not more different, and also here during a recent recording of a VPRO-report on NED 2 called “The Battle for Europe”, it had the viewer doubting if the E.U. was really working in our interest at all.
The presenter duo Teun van de Keuken and Roland Duong focused their painful arrows on their guests. One of the questions was: Why does a MEP in Brussels for a Dutch party sometimes stray away from the party program set out by their party back home in the Netherlands?

Continue Reading →

TSEC’s report on the Muslim Brotherhood in Canada

Posted on by

Posted at Blazing Catfur:

This report is making national news today and deservedly so.

The report was written by Tom Quiggin, a member of the Terrorism and Security Experts of Canada Network (TSEC). Concurrent research at the TSEC network includes a methodology project for intelligence analysts involved in the analysis of extremism. A Horizon Scanning project on the convergence of extremist ideologies is being readied for distribution in late 2014.

This project was funded internally by the TSEC network. There is no government, corporate, media or foreign money involved.

KEY JUDGEMENTS

  • Canada has a significant presence of Muslim Brotherhood adherent individuals and organizations. Their values and actions are frequently the antithesis of the Canadian Constitution, values and law. Despite statements to the contrary, the Muslim Brotherhood considers itself above local laws and national constitutions.
  • The Muslim Brotherhood’s use of settlement and the “process of civilization jihad” has proven effective. The long term aim is to globally impose a virulent form of political Islam to the exclusion of other faiths or systems.
  • Internationally, the Muslim Brotherhood is realigning under pressure as old alliances crumble and opportunities arise. An aggressive posture is re-emerging which has used extensive political violence in the past.
  • The policy and process of denial is deeply rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood.
  • Muslim Brotherhood adherent groups should not be given governmental accreditation, access to public grants nor should they have charity status.
  • Canada’s stance against Muslim Brotherhood adherent organizations in recent years has been more aggressive than the USA, especially in financial areas.

NB – The report is in 11 sections.

Click to continue at BCF

 

If there is another killing in Belgium, the Government and the media are criminal conspirators.

Posted on by

I wrote this few paragraphs as a kind of afterthought on my last post last night. But the more I think about it, the more relevant I think it is. For those of you that agree with the sentiment of it, please feel free to send it out to people by email, repost it, send the link out, copy it and paste it as a comment where relevant etc.

—————————

I have harped on about the following issue a couple of times already but it seems too important a point to let go just yet.

The entire point of a government, security services and media is to protect and inform the public. The fact is that two men went into a museum and arbitrarily shot people to death. The fact that the museum was a Jewish one is largely irrelevant as the people they shot could have been anyone. The media not only did not give a description of the attackers, even once it was known that both of them were still at large and very likely on their way to another target, but covered for whatever government agency denied the information.

Read this excerpt from one of the eye witnesses:

An antique-shop owner, who saw the killer and made eye contact with him as he walked away through the centre of the touristic district, said he was impassive and cold after the murders.

“I caught his eye. There was no expression whatsoever on his face.”

Furthermore, no one, and I mean no one, would spend good money on a security system that just gave fuzzy stills of someone’s hat. They have photos and videos of the perp I am certain, which are better than what we saw. I don’t think they even make cameras that bad anymore. And it was repeatedly stated that there were eye witnesses but no one thought to ask them for a description of the perp and none of the news agencies, not BBC or CNN even mentioned that there was no description of the mass murders currently at large in Belgian streets. An omission that is too large and across too many organizations to be accidental. This has to be policy.

So I ask the public. What is the point of having a government who deliberately misinforms you in order to protect the image of exceptionally bad policy they are too afraid to back down from, or a security service more concerned about the reputation of the ideology that motivated the attack than they are of preventing another one, and a mass media who work three shifts to avoid informing the public on matters that are quite literally life and death.

The time to learn basics about information, logic, reason and responsibility of these agencies is surely here. We as the public need to inform each other, and assist each other in understanding what criteria is for actual information. Because at the moment we do not have a news media. We have general anesthesia.

Eeyore for Vlad.