Could the first item in this post be the cause of the second?

And then this:

From the Toronto Sun

Bill C-6, which proposes changes to the Citizenship Act does a number of troubling things:

– removes the right to revoke citizenships from dual nationals convicted terrorists;

– ends the obligation for new citizens 14-18 and 55-65 to know either English or French or even pass a citizenship test;

– reduces the number of days someone must spend in Canada before they are eligible for citizenship;

– eliminates the obligation that a new citizen will have to “intend” to reside in Canada.

Canada is a generous country. We allow new citizens, under most conditions, to retain the passport of their birth. These individuals become fully eligible for all the benefits from our generous social safety net that Canadians have worked so hard over generations to provide.

These benefits include but are not limited to our universal health care system, Old Age Security, Guaranteed Income Supplement, as well as access to our education system.

H/T Shabnam A.

Youtube deleted entire channel of animator who did video mocking Islamic vehicular jihad

It is frequently said that you know who rules you because they are the people you are forbidden from criticizing. There is some truth to this indeed, even if there is an element of circular logic to it.

But the following example certainly qualifies as a data point to the theory.

First, what happens when you try and watch it on Youtube:

A friend of the animator makes an appeal for the artist who made the now deleted video:

And now the actual video while you can see it at LivLeak

Sebastian Gorka. the corporate media’s new bogey man

It seems that the CNN and other manufacturers of illusions designed to disenfranchise Donald Trump, have chosen Sebastian Gorka as their newest target, possibly to try and draw attention from Trump-Tap, which they are rapidly discovering was perhaps the largest scandal and abuse of power by a sitting president since maybe ever in the USA.

Pajamas Media seems to frame the issue here.

The most outrageous tissue of lies I have seen in my forty-five years as a journalist appeared yesterday on the website of The Forward, a once-great Jewish publication long since absorbed into the echo chamber of liberal propaganda.

The Forward trumpeted an exclusive: It claimed to have found a 2007 Hungarian television interview with Dr. Sebastian Gorka, now a national security adviser to President Trump, in which Gorka endorsed a militia then proposed by anti-Semitic political parties. Embedded in the “exclusive” story is a clip of Dr. Gorka speaking on Hungarian television full of jarring cuts and jumps, and ending strangely in mid-sentence. The Forward may style itself Jewish, but it learned its journalism from classic anti-Semitism.

In fact, as David Reaboi shows at RedState, the Forward’s clip edits out Gorka’s denunciation of the anti-Semitic parties for exploiting popular fears in order to advance their own agenda. Gorka explicitly says that it is the ultra-right parties that are behind the proposal, and that his party, the New Democratic Coalition, is not behind it.

Well. Lets have a look at that actual interview itself, which thanks to the efforts of many good and hard working people, CrossWare especially who did the actual translation and Gates of Vienna who did the edit and prepared the file for subtitling.

Catching Corporate media lying, fabricating evidence, and selectively editing to create a false impression of the truth is now so common it no longer carries the kind of horror and disgust that it rightly should. Much like Muslim migrants raping European Christian girls or beating up Jewish children also has lost its shock.

But all these cases are a sign of the moral slide that leftism and Islam have brought as their principle import to classical civilization. It does not mean that the effects of these actions are any less serious than we always knew they were.

Comparing leftist views on immigration policies, the US Vs. the Islamic world

An original article by Vlad Tepes contributor, Grace.

No doubt the same critics that denounced President Trump’s initial executive order barring people from seven Muslim majority countries are set to oppose his second executive order barring people from six Muslim majority countries. 
People across the United States and Canada took to the streets in protest denouncing President Trump’s first order as racist and Islamophobic. Lawyers were on hand to help those in need. CAIR launched a federal suit challenging the constitutionality of President Trump’s executive order. People wept and carried placards.
Yet sixteen Muslim nations have barred and continue to ban Israelis from entering their nations. Algeria, Bangladesh, Brunei, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen forbid admission into their countries from Israeli passport holders. One doesn’t even need to be Jewish to be denied- proof of visiting Israel is enough to be denied entry.
And let’s not forget that non-Muslims are forbidden to enter the city of Mecca. 

What apartheid really looks like

I have yet to see Americans and Canadians along with their Muslim neighbours taking to the streets to denounce these 16 Muslim nations for their blatant discrimination against Jews and non-Muslims. Where are the placards? The demonstrations? The denunciations? The hypocrisy is astonishing.
Grace for Vlad Tepes Blog.
Sent from my iPad

 

watch CBC do damage control instead of reporting on potential Muslim false flag op for M103

Notice how they deftly sidestep the fact that the man who called in the anti-Muslim bomb threats is a muslim. Notice how they soften the whole issue until by the end, there is no concern for alarm and the whole thing will bring us all closer together.

Classic CBC.

“This is not news, but it takes you away from reality”.

The new CBC version of Peter Truman’s tag line.

The Rebel’s coverage:

CBC segment on M103

The CBC in its typical far left wing extremist purveyor of the narrative fashion, has seen fit to disable comments for this video at Youtube.

So please feel free to leave them here.

Allow me to start with my own.

I think the former MSA leader and MB sympathizer in the Trudeau government either wrote those comments and insults herself, or members of her various support groups did in order to add inertia to the Islamophobia bill she wants passed in Canada.

 

Global News fully disenfranchises all criticism of Islam

In this story about a protest at a mosque in Toronto, Global News has a misleading headline and misleading poster frame for the video.

HEADLINE: ‘Anti-Islamic’ protesters demonstrate outside Toronto mosque calling for ban on Islam

Also notice how they managed to make sure none of the signs are clear enough to read. I highly doubt the original sign is just a green rectangle with a smudge.

They make it appear that it is a story about a protest at a Toronto mosque. And the poster frame for the video shows a group of people with signs. But the article is pure, 100% condemnation of the protest and protestors and so is the video, with no footage of it, no interviews with them, and zero representation of their point of view.

Now maybe these were ugly thugs. Maybe they had a repugnant PoV. but we will never know because Global News robbed them of the chance to be seen as they are.

In the book, The Future of War, by Friedman, one of the founders of STRATFOR, the claim is made that wars happen not because people are different, but because different people are FORCED to mix.

Jordan Peterson, perhaps the most gentle and articulate man to speak on the issues of the day, predominately leftism and its full frontal assault on classical civilization, repeatedly says that when you deny people’s right to be heard, you in fact create the conditions under which violence becomes their only option.

I put it to Trudeau and Global News and all the other water carriers for the narrative that seem to have forgotten that multiculturalism also has to include our culture, and the natural right to defend it, and that diversity includes people other than muslims.

And that if violence takes place, it was a 100% predictable consequence of their policies and therefore, they bear a large degree of the responsibility for it.

 

German State broadcaster, ZDF, made a video comparing Trump to Hitler 4 days after he took office

The only reason the CBC didn’t do one like this is there production values don’t come even remotely close to this. But they certainly broadcast this sentiment at every occasion.

PI News in Germany has written this article about the satire above:

ZDF looking at problems after Trump/Hitler comparison

On January 24th ZDF’s “Frontal 21” presented a typical lynch-media contribution regarding the newest bogeymen of all leftists: US president Donald Trump. But this wasn’t just one of the usual and daily hate-filled small-minded contributions that was after another hair in the soup, another wrong dance step, or another mismatched tie of the new man in the White House. No, this time the brainwash-training channel went one step further, and maybe they went one step too far. In their report “Messiah or Hitler”, which we are supposed to understand as satire, Donald Trump was put in direct comparison with Adolf Hitler.

by L.S. Gabriel

No one is laughing anymore, from the blackest of black-humored Brits to the most moronic fan of weak jokes, after an all-in-all dumb video contribution by the authors Werner Doyé and Andreas Wiemers. This irreverent piece just could not be surpassed. That’s exactly how the publisher of the Jewish Review (Jüdischer Rundschau), Dr. Rafael Korenzecher, sees it, and that’s why he not only wrote an open letter to the ZDF, but he also forwarded the report directly to the US authorities.

 Korenzecher wrote:

Open letter to Herr Kurt Beck, chairman of board of directors of the ZDF

Dear Herr Beck,

Allow us to forewarn you that we deem your contribution on ZDF’s “Frontal 21” from January 24th, 2017, about the newly elected US president Donald J. Trump as defamatory.

With suggestively trimmed video material and accompanying words the entire program about the President of our most important ally and the most important Western democracy was manipulated to produce a prima facie resemblance to Adolf Hitler.

This is not only against the law and extremely defamatory, but it also trivializes the historical assessment of the unprecedented crimes committed by this German war criminal and those responsible for the murder of six million Jews.

We are bringing this incident to your attention because we assume that you missed the broadcast of this deliberately false narration, and that therefore no action has been taken in the exercise of your political and ethical responsibility regarding to the content of broadcasts of this institution of the public broadcasting corporation.

With all due respect for the absolutely indispensable democratic bestowal of freedom of the press, we are of the conviction that the irresponsible propagation of historical falsehoods and defamatory content should not be part of the contributions of the public broadcasting corporation ZDF. We therefore await an appropriate and suitable initiation of a public rectification of this scandalous issue, and we expect a long-term guarantee that a repeat of such incidents in the future will be efficiently prevented.

As a matter of form, allow us to point out that we have forwarded the information about this outrageous behavior of the “Frontal 21” editors to the appropriate US authorities, and have therefore made it possible on their part to consider the potential for an initiation of criminal procedures against the responsible parties.

With greatest respect,

Dr. Rafael Korenzecher

Publisher, Jewish Review and Evrejskaja Panorama


My guess is they will take the CBC approach. Wait a few days till 99% of the impact of it is made, then take it down with a note from some kind of ombudsman which no one will see and fewer will understand as being meaningful.