Category Archives: Political Correctness

British media in a panic. Desperate to maintain the narrative against all reality and evidence, they wage war on working class indigenous British

Posted on by

Today has been a surreal news-day indeed. The Star compares Tommy Robinson with Hitler and calls the EDL, as does the CBC, racist without bothering to provide a lick of evidence for it, and of course, utterly avoiding any mention of the massive anti-white events of the past week by black people within the UK. Even the ones who made white people strip down in public and rob them of their possessions and dignity.

I guess all they have left is to lie louder and more often and at a higher level. I mean if you repeat it often enough it must be true right? Below, the PM actually making a claim about a group of British patriots who should rightly sue the government for such a remark. I cannot imagine what a group of Muslims who might for example, openly advocate for an overthrow of the British government, regime and system might do if he said that about them.

Of course, we don’t have to imagine. We know what they would do, and so does Cameron, and that is why he would never say it right?

Tommy Robinson, if you are out there and reading, invest in the best lawyer you can find.  Perhaps the EDL can now enjoy the kind of government funding that anti-British Muslim groups have been enjoying under the beard of ‘inter-faith’ groups.

For an excellent analysis on some of the absurd and truly totalitarian (in the sense that the government will forego law, justice and reason to maintain and preserve an ideological narrative at all costs) please click through to this gates of Vienna article.

The racist CBC continues its brazen, baseless attack on any group it doesn’t like with the usual PC ammo

Posted on by

I confess I haven’t managed to get all the way through this article. The CBC calls the EDL a “racist Organization” without even feeling the slightest need for actual evidence and that, in an article dealing with Islamic terror in the UK. Stunning. I wonder, if every time I referred to the racist CBC as the racist CBC, you know, because of thier demonstrable bias against the one Jewish state on earth, Israel, while utterly failing to discuss the incredible and genuine apartheid of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and another dozen islamic states I wonder if the racist CBC would, you know, sue me or try and silence me in some way. I think its time I found out. I think its time a few of us reffered to the racist CBC as the racist CBC. I mean as they have no compunction whatsoever to refer to the EDL as anything other than the racist EDL without even bothering to give evidence of it.

By the way, I will be posting a little less in the next few weeks. I will be making a short documentary on the grotesque bias of the CBC with a few dozen of their own clips which should allow even the most scrupulous of wordsmiths to have no hesitation to add the adjective, ‘racist’ before the term CBC. I look forward to broadcasting it.

 

Are you sure they were black?

Posted on by

For the past few decades there has been a slow but consistent shift of how we are expected to view culpability. Most likely because of the memes invented and implanted by the Frankfurt School, but if that is too conspiratorial for us, then just a slow natural shift perhaps due to the raw affluence of our capitalist successes and consequent wealth, leading to extravagances of thought, the idea that we are so much better than everyone else, we must actually be more responsible than everyone else.

The shift of course is one of moving away from anti-racism to genuine racism and calling it anti racism. This happens in lots of ways but the most repugnant is:

The deliberate suppression of any information about racism towards white people, including the sanitization of history in order to make it appear as if only white Europeans are capable of agency and that all other people are acting ‘naturally’ in some manner.

This would be the racism of lower expectations. That non-white people somehow cannot help being what they are, so we must celebrate their cultures at the expense of our own, while simultaneously making our own cultures repugnant to us as well as, in many cases, actually illegal. (Smoking in bars very illegal, hookah in kebab joints, a proud symbol of multiculturalism) We look at our own culture as being a function of choice so we can make our own religions illegal, our habits and vices, (unless they are seen to annoy conservatives) while violating all our own conceptions of natural human rights to accommodate the most primitive cultures we can find and then pay them to live among us, while they break our laws and customs with malice and contempt for all we have created.

One must at all costs avoid the evidence of ones own senses…

in favour of the notion that all ethnic groups get along really well and the only real problem in England are not the non-British people, who often feel no connection with British culture, and indeed have no connection with British history. After all when they form vigilante groups to take the law into their own hands because of a clear and indisputable failure of the British constabulary to defend the property and safety of the people within England (I hesitate to say English people) at the best of times and are actually worse than useless during the riots…

There does seem to be an odd double standard here though. Why is it when non-white people who have no actual British cultural heritage get swords and stand around in a mob racing from place to place to fight other gangs, these people are noble men protecting their culture, their way of life and their families. Listen to the Sikh’s speak about the importance of their temples to them. I agree with them of course, they should have the right to defend them for whatever reasons at all, even if it’s just because it’s where they hide the porn. But the fact that the media makes damn sure that it appears noble when untrained armed men run around looking for a fight so long as they are:

1. Not white

2. Not culturally British in any traditional way

“…We joined these Sikh volunteers in Hansworth as they stood vigil outside their temple…”

And then, you have what the Prime Minister of England himself says about the one group of British ‘youths’ who actually want to defend rule of law, British culture and liberal democracy, the history of the UK and the preservation of it’s people and history, right from the official record of Parliament (Thanks Baron)

The Prime Minister: The hon. Gentleman speaks not only for his constituents, but, frankly, for the whole House in deprecating the English Defence League and all it stands for. On its attempt to say that it will somehow help to restore order, I have described some parts of our society as sick, and there is none sicker than the EDL.

Yep. Those noble Sikhs and Muslims and everyone else showing community spirit and stepping up to the plate to defend their temples and businesses from lawlessness. But the British who actually tried to defend not just their homes but entire communities including all within from rioters and looters? None sicker than they.

Eeyore for Vlad.

 

 

 

London riots: BBC criticised for branding thugs as ‘protesters’

Posted on by

The Telegraph: 

The BBC was criticised for its political correctness last night after continually referring to the yobs rioting across London as “protesters”.

A masked rioter is seen in front of a burning car in Hackney

Image 1 of 3
A masked rioter taunts police in front of a burning car in Hackney Photo: EPA

6:30AM BST 09 Aug 2011

Two days after a peaceful protest over the death of suspected gangster Mark Duggan in Tottenham ended, the corporation was still using the term to describe violent looters.

That was despite the fact that hundreds of youths, with no connection to events in Tottenham, had since run riot across the capital.

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, and police have all condemned the youths as “criminals” whose behaviour is “utterly appalling”. Yet senior BBC presenters and reporters on the ground yesterday continued to describe those behind the violence as “protesters”.

The move sparked a wave of anger from members of the public on Twitter.

Duncan Barkes wrote on the micro-blogging website: “Hello BBC. They are not protesters, are they? Rioters better description. I mean, what’s the cause for the protest?”

Dee Modha said: “This hackney BBC reporter needs to stop calling them protesters. Thugs, hooligans and opportunists are better words.” Continue Reading →

Is this for real?

Posted on by

It appears that gangs of black people are going around in the US and looking for white people to mug, beat, nearly kill and generally assault and for no reason other than that they, the victims, are white.

Many believe that, for some reason, this is not racist. But of course we can guess what would happen if, say, a few university students were to hang a black person in effigy on a tree on a university campus. Not actually target a black person for violence mind you, just do some mischief in a way that could be interpreted as anti-black racism, even though the person being hung, again purely symbolically, was a well known political leader, and infinitely more and worse things had been done to the previous white US leader and no FBI investigations took place as a result.

So whether we think that racism can only be done by white people towards other ethnic groups or not, it appears that this is the defacto application of the term as far as law enforcement goes. This, dear friends, is a recipe for civil war. That real racism becomes systemic, as a ‘cure’ for abstracted racism in the public mind, real or imagined.

My question is, where is the line between isolated incidents and a conspiracy or policy?

There is lots more on Blazing Cat fur.

More Muslim Mayhem in Montreal!

Posted on by

This is the second (albeit thwarted) Islamic inspired terror attack in North America that happened to catch my notice, since the Norwegian horror. Odd that in this story as in the one of the man who planned to attack Ft. Hood (for the second time by a Muslim) no mention of Islam as the motive is made. Go figure. Well if they had ever once visited a Church or had their pictures taken at one, we know what they would have called them now, don’t we?

Terror charge court appearance for Oldham couple

Posted on by

From Local BBC.

As the tipster was kind enough to point out, terrorism charges just aren’t worthy of national BBC anymore. At least when its Muslims.

 

A couple from Oldham have appeared in court charged with offences under the Terrorism Act.

Mohammed Sajid Khan, 33, and his wife Shasta Khan, 37, from Foster Street, are accused of engaging in conduct in preparation for acts of terrorism.

The alleged offences are said to have taken place between August 2010 and July of this year.

They are due to appear at the Old Bailey on 22 August and Mr Khan has been remanded in custody.

Terrorism unit investigationThe couple appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court earlier and spoke only to confirm their names, ages and address.

Mr Khan has been charged with conduct in preparation for acts of terrorism.

Mrs Khan has been charged with possessing information likely to be useful to a person committing an act of terrorism.

The charges follow an investigation carried out by the North West Counter Terrorism Unit.

“There is no evidence to suggest any communities in Greater Manchester or the surrounding areas are at immediate risk,” police said.

The Weather Channel

Posted on by

The outgoing Israeli embassador to the United Nations is reported to have quipped to a reporter, (paraphrasing and adding my own commentary…)

‘When Jews kill Muslims it’s a massacre (even after it is discovered that it never took place such as in Jenin)

‘When Christians kill Muslims it is a crusade’ (even after it is discovered that it was a defensive action against an invading and hostile Islam like, well like the crusades)

‘But when Muslims kill Muslims it is the weather channel’ (like we see every day and nearly everywhere Muslims represent enough of the population to act with impunity or with complicity of a Muslim law enforcement. Contemporary Syria or Pakistan is one example that manages to stay off of our TV sets while we focus on the deluded rantings of an extreme narcissist because he fits a relativist narrative, and that, even though he didn’t kill any Muslims, yet is being used as an example of how evil ‘our side’ is.

Have a look at some of these videos recently smuggled out of Syria. Then, have another look at Bill Whittle’s excellent video on ‘The Narrative’. A clip that does more to explain where and why the great eye of TV media shines than does Lord of the Rings for Sauroman.

Masked Gunmen Filmed Sniping Into Large Syria Protest  

Bloody Day in Syria as Opposition Protest Continue

 

And dozens more here: 

H/T Dan F NYC

Three Clips of Michael Coren on SUN TV

Posted on by

I am very much looking forward to Mr. Coren’s own show on SUN TV. The station really is picking up. It is also refreshing to have at least one TV channel in Canada who has the courage to actually report the real news without sanitizing it for the left and politically correct.

Now if we can only privatize the CBC:

Here is Michael interviewing a person on the plight of Christians world wide and especially in the Islamic world. Pakistan and Egypt spring to mind especially.

Below, an East Coast Canadian newspaper editor published a cartoon which depicted Muslims, although not Mohamed, for which complaints were received.

Fred Litwin, who also runs the blog, Gay and Right, as well as started the very important, ‘Free Thinking Film Society’ who has brought in to speak people like Bat Ye’or, Sam Solomon, Geert Wilders and other people who otherwise would never have spoken in Canada, speaks here on how the gay pride parade incorporates many variables which have nothing to do with gay pride, or gay rights.

I agree with Fred here and would add, that homosexuals having achieved all rational goals and rights in Canada as they certainly should have, now want to force gay sex on to main street and then accuse anyone who objects to flagrant breaches of indecency laws as being ‘homophobic. It is worth noting that there is a difference between tolerance and embracing. One is requested, the other is your own business.

The BBC attempts to castigate Robert Spencer for the Oslo monster’s actions

Posted on by
Spencer + BBC - BBC attempts to castigate Robert Spencer     

 

The above link shows very well how opportunistic leftist bias is in mass media, especially government controlled media such as the BBC or CBC. Robert defends himself very well where really, no defense should have been required at all.

The same BBC, and the CBC has similar if not identical policies, well carefully select out Islamic influence in the constant stream of Muslim atrocities well supported both by Islamic scripture as well as Islamic organizations who quote the Koran and other central dogma of Islam as their motive and inspiration and even more. their very instruction for these murders and acts of mass slaughter. Yet the BBC feels it necessary to accuse Spencer of being an influence in an act he could not possibly ever have known would take place.

Thanks Gates of Vienna for the file